Historical Drought Analysis for: Southwest Oklahoma, Climate Division 7

Similar documents
Historical Drought Analysis for: Central Oklahoma, Climate Division 5

Historical Drought Analysis for: Oklahoma Panhandle, Climate Division 8

Historical Drought Analysis for: East Central Oklahoma, Climate Division 6

Historical Drought Analysis for: Northeast Oklahoma, Climate Division 3

Chapter 12 Monitoring Drought Using the Standardized Precipitation Index

UPPLEMENT A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY DROUGHT IN THE UNITED STATES TO THE 1930S AND 1950S DROUGHT EPISODES

Drought Criteria. Richard J. Heggen Department of Civil Engineering University of New Mexico, USA Abstract

NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION MEETING. December 3, 2008 Birmingham Alabama. Roger McNeil Service Hydrologist NWS Birmingham Alabama

Indices and Indicators for Drought Early Warning

The 1986 Southeast Drought in Historical Perspective

High Resolution Indicators for Local Drought Monitoring

Drought Monitoring in Mainland Portugal

Drought and Climate Extremes Indices for the North American Drought Monitor and North America Climate Extremes Monitoring System. Richard R. Heim Jr.

History of California Drought

Fire Weather Monitoring and Predictability in the Southeast

Drought Analysis of Rajshahi of Bangladesh Using CORDEX data by Palmer Method

SOUTHERN CLIMATE MONITOR

Drought Indices in Decision-making Process of Drought Management

THE USE OF STANDARDIZED INDICATORS (SPI AND SPEI) IN PREDICTING DROUGHTS OVER THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA TERRITORY

Drought History. for Southeast Oklahoma. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

Drought History. for the Low Rolling Plains of Texas. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

Drought History. for the Oklahoma Panhandle. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Recent Long Island Drought

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System May 23, 2017

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(4): Sujitha E and Shanmugasundaram K

Drought History. for the Edwards Plateau of Texas. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

Introduc)on to Drought Indices

Illinois Drought Update, December 1, 2005 DROUGHT RESPONSE TASK FORCE Illinois State Water Survey, Department of Natural Resources

Drought History. for the Northern Mountains of New Mexico. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

Comparative assessment of different drought indices across the Mediterranean

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System July 18, 2017

DROUGHT IN MAINLAND PORTUGAL

Funding provided by NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Project MONITORING DROUGHT. Basic Climatology Colorado Climate Center

Precipitation. Standardized Precipitation Index. NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System January 3, 2017

DROUGHT A WATER SCARCITY CASE STUDY BY STATISTICAL APPROACH

COMPARISON OF DROUGHT INDICES AND SC DROUGHT ALERT PHASES

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 18, 2017

The Impact of Weather Extreme Events on US Agriculture

Spatio-temporal pattern of drought in Northeast of Iran

Southern Climate Monitor. In This Issue: April 2018 Volume 8, Issue 4. Page 2-3: Simple Planning Tool for Oklahoma Climate Hazards

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 21, 2017

The MRCC and Monitoring Drought in the Midwest

ASSESSING THE PREDICTABILITY OF WEEKLY DROUGHT IMPROVEMENT USING NEBRASKA S AUTOMATED WEATHER DATA NETWORK. By Matthew J. Salerno A MASTER S THESIS

Monthly probabilistic drought forecasting using the ECMWF Ensemble system

Analysis of Meteorological drought condition for Bijapur region in the lower Bhima basin, India

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System February 12, 2019

The New Normal or Was It?

Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Drought over a Tropical Wet Station of India in the Recent Decades Using the SPI Method

Multiple-Year Droughts In Nebraska

Water Availability in Alaska: Using and Understanding NOAA s Drought Monitor and Drought Outlook

Analytical Report. Drought in the Horn of Africa February Executive summary. Geographical context. Likelihood of drought impact (LDI)

Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System December 30, 2018

The Climate of Grady County

DROUGHT ASSESSMENT USING SATELLITE DERIVED METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND NDVI IN POTOHAR REGION

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 14, 2017

Package scpdsi. November 18, 2018

January 25, Summary

Upper Missouri River Basin December 2017 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast December 5, 2017

KEY WORDS: Palmer Meteorological Drought Index, SWAP, Kriging spatial analysis and Digital Map.

Assessment of meteorological drought using SPI in West Azarbaijan Province, Iran

The North American Drought Monitor - The Canadian Perspective -

SWIM and Horizon 2020 Support Mechanism

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System May 1, 2018

The United States Drought Monitor How is it Made?

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System January 16, 2018

LESSON 9: HOT, HOTTER, HOTTEST Extreme Weather s Impact on Our Resources

Thursday, February 20th Issued: 2:30pm CST

Precipitation. Standardized Precipitation Index. NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System September 5, 2017

Precipitation. Standardized Precipitation Index. NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System December 6, 2016

Urban Water Security Research Alliance

GIS Tools, Data, & Methods in the Weekly US Drought Monitor

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System August 8, 2017

NADM, NACEM, and Opportunities for Future Collaboration

Drought News August 2014

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 13, 2018

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System October 17, 2017

Drought Assessment under Climate Change by Using NDVI and SPI for Marathwada

The U.S. Drought Monitor: A Composite Indicator Approach

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System March 26, 2019

NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System February 7, 2017

WEATHER AND CLIMATE COMPLETING THE WEATHER OBSERVATION PROJECT CAMERON DOUGLAS CRAIG

SOUTHERN CLIMATE MONITOR

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System September 4, 2018

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System February 19, 2019

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System February 6, 2018

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System December 18, 2018

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

Thursday, March 19, 2015 Issued: 1:00pm CDT

CARIWIN Regional Seminar January 14-15, 2010, Georgetown, Guyana

Meteorological Drought Analysis in the Modder River Basin, South Africa

Climate Dataset: Aitik Closure Project. November 28 th & 29 th, 2018

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY October 2016

2011 National Seasonal Assessment Workshop for the Eastern, Southern, & Southwest Geographic Areas

Regional Drought Decision Support System (RDDSS) Project Update and Product Concepts

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY November 2017

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY January 2018

Global Climates. Name Date

Transcription:

Historical Drought Analysis for: Southwest Oklahoma, Climate Division 7 Irenea Lodangco, Rachel Riley & Gina Fujan University of Oklahoma Prepared by the Southern Climate Impacts Planning Program November 2015

Introduction The National Drought Policy Commission Report in 2000 defined drought as a persistent and abnormal moisture deficiency having adverse impacts on vegetation, animals, or people. This study aims at providing drought information to tribal, local, or regional officials by examining the patterns and characteristics of droughts that have occurred in Oklahoma climate division 7 (CD7), also known as the Southwest division. CD7 covers most of Caddo-Wichita-Delaware, and the vast majorities of Kiowa- Comanche-Apache-Fort Sill Apache and Kiowa-Comanche-Apache-Ft Sill Apache/Caddo-Wichita-Delaware tribal jurisdictions and the Caddo, Comanche, Cotton, Greer, Harmon, Jackson, Kiowa, and Tillman counties. Oklahoma is comprised of nine climate divisions (CDs). CD boundaries are based on temperature and precipitation averages of reporting stations in the state 1. The following historical drought characteristics for CD7 are described in this document: Average and maximum duration of past drought events, in months Average and maximum intensity of past drought events Average month of drought onset and termination Characteristics of the 10 longest drought events Climatology of drought events Wet periods (i.e. drought breaks) Drought Indices The data used in this analysis were the drought indices extracted from the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Center for Weather and Climate (formerly the National Climatic Data Center, NCDC). The drought data are publicly available and the description of the variables is available on the NCEI-CWC website 2. A by-product database was produced containing the following indices and variables for all Oklahoma climate divisions. The purpose of this by-product database was to compare indices and determine the most useful information for this document. Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI) Modified Palmer Drought Severity Index (PMDI) Palmer Z-Index (ZNDX) Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) in 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 24-month time period Temperature Data Precipitation Data To quantify drought events, several drought indices have been previously developed by various agencies and organizations based on specific criteria. Planners and managers look 1 Guttmann and Quayle (1995) 2 http://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo/cdodivisionalselect.jsp, ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cirs/climdiv/divisional-readme.txt 2

at the indices to help them decide when to start implementing measures to mitigate drought impacts. The strengths and weaknesses of PDSI, and the explanation for the development of the modified PDSI are presented on the website of the National Drought Mitigation Center 3. PDSI uses observations or estimates of precipitation, temperature and soil water content. The NCEI s explanation for modifying the PDSI is as follows: The Modified Palmer Drought Severity Index (PMDI) was instituted by the National Weather Service Analysis Center, who modified the PDSI for operational meteorological purposes. The PMDI and PDSI have the same value during an established drought or wet spell but they have different values during transition periods. The PMDI incorporates a weighted average of the wet and dry index terms, using probability as the weighting factor. An index that can be employed to illustrate short- and long-term droughts is the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). SPI is based only on precipitation but has the advantage of showing multiple time scales, from 1-month to 24-month time period. The 24-month SPI time scale shows the longer duration droughts whereas the 1-3 month time scale shows the shorter duration droughts. The aforementioned indices were plotted for the years 1895-2014. All of the drought events were captured by each index. After considering the pros and cons of both indices, the PMDI was chosen for this analysis over PDSI. The PMDI is represented by a single value that can serve as a tool in real time monitoring and assessment of drought conditions. The U.S. Drought Monitor also provides way to understand historical and current droughts but the dataset only goes back to the year 2000. Analyzing a drought index provides a way to compare drought length and magnitude over time. For PMDI, a value of 0 indicates normal conditions, positive values indicate wet conditions, and negative values indicate dry conditions. The negative PMDI is divided into five categories, some of which indicate drought. For this study, the Palmer Classification 4 was adopted to categorize the drought intensity or severity. Table 1 lists the drought intensity categories used in this study. PMDI Value Drought Category Color Designation 0 to -0.49 Normal -0.5 to -0.99 Incipient Drought -1.0 to -1.99 Mild Drought -2.0 to -2.99 Moderate Drought -3.0 to -3.99 Severe Drought -4.0 or less Extreme Drought Table 1. Drought index values and respective categories and colors. Drought Analysis The drought characteristics derived from the analysis reflect the various aspects of individual drought events. The drought metrics that were used in this study included 3 http://drought.unl.edu/planning/monitoring/comparisonofindicesintro/pdsi.aspx 4 http://drought.unl.edu/planning/monitoring/comparisonofindicesintro/pdsi.aspx 3

frequency of drought events in each climate division, onset and termination date, duration, peak intensity, date of peak intensity, duration of breaks, total precipitation, and percent of normal precipitation. Please note that most recent 1981-2010 monthly precipitation normals were used for the relevant calculations, which means that the precipitation statistics for each drought event were compared to the corresponding average precipitation statistics for the 30 year period between 1981 and 2010. The impacts of drought are manifested in severity and duration. Droughts have occurred in all Oklahoma climate divisions but each drought event possesses unique characteristics. Droughts differ in intensity, duration, and other attributes. Characteristics of Drought in CD7 Table 2 shows the average, maximum, and minimum of drought variables in CD7, implying the characteristics of historical drought conditions in this division. Climate Division 7 Drought Characteristics Averages Drought Onset (day-month) 12-Jul Drought End (day-month) 20-Jul Drought Event (months) 6.36 Incipient Dry Spell (months) 1.14 Mild Drought (months) 2.16 Moderate Drought (months) 1.37 Severe Drought (months) 1.23 Extreme Drought (months) 0.46 Peak Intensity (0 to -4 scale) -2.17 Peak Intensity Occurrence (day-months) 28-Jul Break Between Drought Events (months) 9.81 Average Percent of Normal Precip. 56.24 Maximum Drought Event (months) 52 Incipient Dry Spell (months) 7 Mild Drought (months) 14 Moderate Drought (months) 16 Severe Drought (months) 13 Extreme Drought (months) 10 Peak Intensity (0 to -4 scale) -6.99 Date of Maximum Peak Intensity (mm/yyyy) 08/2011 Break Between Drought Events (months) 44 Maximum Percent of Normal Precip. 90.26 Minimum Break Between Drought Events (months) 2 Minimum Percent of Normal Precip. 0.72 Table 2. List of the averages, maximums, and minimums of drought variables for the period 1895-2014. Major Drought Events in CD7 Droughts that lasted for more than 12 months were classified as major drought events in this study. Prolonged droughts have more consequences and adverse impacts on society. Table 3 lists the ten longest drought events in CD7. The duration (in months) under a specific drought intensity category is shown. The peak intensity (the lowest PMDI value) during each drought s occurrence, year/month when the peak intensity has occurred, total precipitation, departure from normal precipitation, and percent of normal precipitation are also included in the table. 4

Start Date (Year/Month) End Date (Year/Month) Incipient Mild Climate Division 7 Moderate Severe Extreme Peak Intensity Peak Date (Year/Month) Total Precip. (in.) Departure from Normal (in.) 2010/08 2014/12 53 7 12 16 11 6-6.99 2011/08 92.75-40.39 69.66 1951/10 1953/10 25 5 4 5 10 1-4.35 1952/10 45.96-17.75 72.14 1916/12 1918/11 24 1 4 4 8 7-5.73 1918/08 40.14-20.42 66.28 1936/02 1938/01 24 4 14 4 1 1-4.84 1936/08 42.34-18.22 69.91 1910/03 1911/11 21 1 2 3 5 10-6.01 1911/06 33.83-22.81 59.73 1939/02 1940/10 21 2 1 5 13 0-3.87 1939/11 36.95-19.37 65.61 1963/02 1964/10 21 1 5 9 6 0-3.91 1963/10 39.94-16.38 70.92 1933/10 1935/05 20 1 8 3 8 0-3.64 1934/07 39.14-9.13 81.09 1903/10 1905/03 18 1 5 6 6 0-3.93 1904/05 30.35-11.08 73.26 1966/11 1968/04 18 2 4 1 8 3-4.46 1967/08 28.88-12.03 70.59 Table 3. Ten longest drought events in climate division 7. Departure from normal and percent of normal calculations were based on the 1981-2010 monthly precipitation normals (i.e. averages). % of Normal Precip. 5

Climatology of Drought Events in CD7 The chronology and evolution of drought events for the entire period of record is plotted and shown on a decadal interval in figures 1a-1d. Major droughts were classified as lasting for more than 12 months and listed on top of each graph in red. The magnitude of drought progressing on a monthly time scale is represented by negative index values that also indicate the onset and termination of the event. The major drought events are indicated by more negative index values and red colors. As seen in the graphs of drought indices, the recent 2010/08-2014/012 drought was the most prolonged and lasted for 53 months. It was also the most severe drought with record low of -6.99 PMDI over the historical period 1895-2014. It ran uninterrupted as no break or wet period is seen in the graph. The drought of 1951/10-1953/10 had the second longest duration and lasted for 25 months with its lowest PMDI being -4.35. The droughts in 1930s, though shorter durations and not as intense as in other CDs, were associated with Dust Bowl of the Great Plains. Some droughts were also severe but their duration was relatively short. These were the droughts in 1910/03-1911/11 (-6.01 PMDI), 1916/12-1918/11 (-5.73 PMDI), 1955/12-1957/03 (-5.14 PMDI), and 1970/05-1971/09 (-5.46 PMDI). The long-duration wet periods in CD7 were observed in late 1900s, late 1910s/early 1920s, and late 1980s though 1990s. CD7 had a total of 95 drought events during the period of record. Fig. 1a. Drought events chronology and evolution from 1900-1929 for Climate Division 7. 6

Fig. 1b. Same as Fig. 1a, but for 1930-1959 drought events. Fig. 1c. Same as Fig. 1a, but for 1960-1989 drought events. 7

Fig. 1d. Same as Fig. 1a, but for 1990-2014 drought events. Wet Period A wet period indicates the time (in months) between drought events. There were years when only 1 break or wet period was observed whereas other years had 2 or more breaks. These breaks are shown in figures 2a and 2b. The number of bars per year indicates the number of breaks that a particular year had. The longest wet period for CD7 was 44 months, the shortest wet period was 2 months and the average wet period was 10 months. A very short wet period between some drought events indicates a short or very little recovery before the next drought occurred. 8

Fig. 2a. Breaks or wet periods per year. Fig. 2b. Same as Fig. 2a, but for 1955-2014. Additional Data Raw data are available from SCIPP as a Microsoft Excel file. If you would like to access this data, contact SCIPP at scipp@southernclimate.org or 405-325-7809. 9