Random Matrix Theory

Similar documents
Random Matrix Theory for the Wilson-Dirac operator

The Effect of the Low Energy Constants on the Spectral Properties of the Wilson Dirac Operator

Spectrum of the Dirac Operator and Random Matrix Theory

Continuous Insights in the Wilson Dirac Operator

Probing the mixed regime of ChiPT with mixed actions

Banks-Casher-type relations for complex Dirac spectra

Statistical QCD with non-positive measure

PION DECAY CONSTANT AT FINITE TEMPERATURE IN THE NONLINEAR SIGMA MODEL

Effects of low-lying eigenmodes in the epsilon regime of QCD

QCD and Instantons: 12 Years Later. Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State

Lectures on Chiral Perturbation Theory

QCD phase transition. One of the fundamental challenges in modern physics. Non-perturbative phenomena. No theoretical control at µ > 0 so far...

Effective Field Theories for lattice QCD

Gell-Mann - Oakes - Renner relation in a magnetic field at finite temperature.

Anomalies and discrete chiral symmetries

Chiral symmetry breaking, instantons, and monopoles

Pions in the quark matter phase diagram

Two Loop Partially Quenched and Finite Volume Chiral Perturbation Theory Results

QCD at Finite Density and the Sign Problem

Phase of the Fermion Determinant and the Phase Diagram of QCD

The Phases of QCD. Thomas Schaefer. North Carolina State University

Chiral Random Matrix Model as a simple model for QCD

Baroion CHIRAL DYNAMICS

1/N Expansions in String and Gauge Field Theories. Adi Armoni Swansea University

The 1/N expansion method in quantum field theory

arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 19 Jan 2018

Introduction to chiral perturbation theory II Higher orders, loops, applications

arxiv:hep-lat/ v1 23 Dec 1997

Lattice QCD. QCD 2002, I. I. T. Kanpur, November 19, 2002 R. V. Gavai Top 1

The Phases of QCD. Thomas Schaefer. North Carolina State University

Two-colour Lattice QCD with dynamical fermions at non-zero density versus Matrix Models

Introduction to Instantons. T. Daniel Brennan. Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Field Theory. Effects of Instanton- Matter Interactions.

Axial symmetry in the chiral symmetric phase

Is the up-quark massless? Hartmut Wittig DESY

Hierarchy problem. 1 Motivation. extremely-fine tuning needed to account for M H =125GeV. Higgs boson M=125GeV. Top quark m=173gev

Overview of low energy NN interaction and few nucleon systems

The chiral anomaly and the eta-prime in vacuum and at low temperatures

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 23 Jul 2003

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Calculation of decay constant using gradient flow, towards the Kaon bag parameter. University of Tsukuba, A. Suzuki and Y.

QCD in the light quark (up & down) sector (QCD-light) has two mass scales M(GeV)

National Nuclear Physics Summer School Lectures on Effective Field Theory. Brian Tiburzi. RIKEN BNL Research Center

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II

Lefschetz-thimble path integral and its physical application

Holographic study of magnetically induced QCD effects:

Dual quark condensate and dressed Polyakov loops

Topological susceptibility in (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD with overlap fermion

QCD-like theories at finite density

Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems

condensates and topology fixing action

The unitary pion mass at O(p 4 ) in SU(2) ChPT

Lecture II: Owe Philipsen. The ideal gas on the lattice. QCD in the static and chiral limit. The strong coupling expansion at finite temperature

PHOTONS and PARTIAL QUENCHING η 3π AT TWO LOOPS: STATUS and PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Heisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians

't Hooft anomalies, 2-charge Schwinger model, and domain walls in hot super Yang-Mills theory

The Fermion Bag Approach

Anomalies, gauge field topology, and the lattice

Walking technicolor on the lattice

Bethe Salpeter studies of mesons beyond rainbow-ladder

How far can you go? Surprises & pitfalls in three-flavour chiral extrapolations

Lattice Gauge Theory: A Non-Perturbative Approach to QCD

Axions. Kerstin Helfrich. Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics, / 31

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 27 Mar 1998

Finite Temperature Field Theory

QCD in the δ-regime. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Related content. Recent citations

LOW-ENERGY QCD and STRANGENESS in the NUCLEON

arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 15 Nov 2013

Chiral Symmetry Breaking from Monopoles and Duality

The interplay of flavour- and Polyakov-loop- degrees of freedom

National Nuclear Physics Summer School Lectures on Effective Field Theory. Brian Tiburzi. RIKEN BNL Research Center

Lecture II. QCD and its basic symmetries. Renormalisation and the running coupling constant

Fun with 2-Group Symmetry. Po-Shen Hsin California Institute of Technology October 13, Benini, Córdova, PH

Electromagnetic and spin polarisabilities from lattice QCD

Rotor Spectra, Berry Phases, and Monopole Fields: From Antiferromagnets to QCD

η π 0 γγ decay in the three-flavor Nambu Jona-Lasinio model

Lecture 12 Holomorphy: Gauge Theory

Critical Level Statistics and QCD Phase Transition

Goldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD

Complex Saddle Points in Finite Density QCD

1 Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering

2. Formulation of fermion theory, doubling phenomenon. Euclideanize, introduces 4d cubic lattice. On links introduce (for QCD) SU(3) matrices U n1,n

Duality, Statistical Mechanics and Random Matrices. Bielefeld Lectures

The symmetries of QCD (and consequences)

The Hadronic Decay Ratios of η 5π at NLO in χpt

The Big Picture. Thomas Schaefer. North Carolina State University

Quark Mass from Tachyon

Wess-Zumino-Witten term in QCD-like theories

Canonical partition functions in lattice QCD

Dynamical Locking of the Chiral and the Deconfinement Phase Transition

Condensates in QCD from Dual Models

CHIRAL SYMMETRY AT HIGH ENERGIES: HARD PION CHIRAL PERTURBATION THEORY

A study of chiral symmetry in quenched QCD using the. Overlap-Dirac operator

Nucleons from 5D Skyrmions

LEADING LOGARITHMS FOR THE NUCLEON MASS

T.W. Chiu, Chung-Yuan Christian Univ, May 13, 2008 p.1/34. The Topology in QCD. Ting-Wai Chiu Physics Department, National Taiwan University

arxiv: v1 [hep-lat] 30 Oct 2018

Michael CREUTZ Physics Department 510A, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Finite-temperature Field Theory

Mass Components of Mesons from Lattice QCD

Dual and dressed quantities in QCD

Transcription:

Random Matrix Theory Gernot Akemann Faculty of Physics, Bielefeld University STRONGnet summer school, ZiF Bielefeld, 14-25 June 2011

Content What is RMT about? Nuclear Physics, Number Theory, Quantum Chaos,... quantum counterparts of classically chaotic systems display random matrix statistics [BGS 84] 2/18

Content What is RMT about? Nuclear Physics, Number Theory, Quantum Chaos,... quantum counterparts of classically chaotic systems display random matrix statistics [BGS 84] What does RMT have to do with QCD? describes spectrum of QCD Dirac-operator in precise limit (N c = 3): ε-regime of χpt(un-physical finite-v limit) RMT to LO 2/18

Content What is RMT about? Nuclear Physics, Number Theory, Quantum Chaos,... quantum counterparts of classically chaotic systems display random matrix statistics [BGS 84] What does RMT have to do with QCD? describes spectrum of QCD Dirac-operator in precise limit (N c = 3): ε-regime of χpt(un-physical finite-v limit) RMT to LO What can we compute in RMT? - analytic form of spectral density, distribution of smallest eigenvalue - as functions of: Σ = qq, F (if we include µ iso ), χsb pattern, gauge field topology = ν zero modes of D (index Theorem) 2/18

Content What is RMT about? Nuclear Physics, Number Theory, Quantum Chaos,... quantum counterparts of classically chaotic systems display random matrix statistics [BGS 84] What does RMT have to do with QCD? describes spectrum of QCD Dirac-operator in precise limit (N c = 3): ε-regime of χpt(un-physical finite-v limit) RMT to LO What can we compute in RMT? - analytic form of spectral density, distribution of smallest eigenvalue - as functions of: Σ = qq, F (if we include µ iso ), χsb pattern, gauge field topology = ν zero modes of D (index Theorem) What cannot be computed? - actual value of Σ or F : fit density[σ, F] to Lattice data - χsb or not: β(n f ) 2/18

Example: Lattice vs spectrum of Dirac eigenvalue density 0.5 density ρ D (λ) Trδ(D λ) QCD 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 lim 1 V Σ ρ(x) = x 2 [J 0(x 2 ) + J 1 (x 2 )] 1st eigenvalue p 1 (x) = x 2 e x2 /4 at ν = 0, with λv Σ = x 2 4 6 8 spacing 1/V 1/L free case 3/18

Example: Lattice vs spectrum of Dirac eigenvalue density 0.5 density ρ D (λ) Trδ(D λ) QCD 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 lim 1 V Σ ρ(x) = x 2 [J 0(x 2 ) + J 1 (x 2 )] 1st eigenvalue p 1 (x) = x 2 e x2 /4 at ν = 0, with λv Σ = x 0.6 2 4 6 8 spacing 1/V 1/L free case 0.5 0.4 chue chse choe 0.4 0.3 P min (ζ) 0.2 ρ S (ζ) 0.2 0.1 0 0 2 4 6 ζ 0 0 5 10 15 ζ 3/18

Lattice vs. smallest Dirac eigenvalues 1st Dirac-eigenvalue vs. Lattice with chiral fermions [Edwards et at. 98]: 4/18

Lattice vs. smallest Dirac eigenvalues 1st Dirac-eigenvalue vs. Lattice with chiral fermions [Edwards et at. 98]: ν = 0 (top): SU(2) SU(3) SU(2) adj. & ν = 1 (bottom): different χsb patters 4/18

Lecture 1 the approximation of QCD εχpt equivalence εχpt to RMT and limitations first results from RMT: - flavor-topology duality and - smallest eigenvalue distribution 5/18

Setup QCD full theory (Euclidean) +ε µνρσ F µν F ρσ topological term Z QCD [da][dψ] exp[ Tr Ψ(/D + M)Ψ + FF + iθf F] with N f quarks Ψ of masses M, gauge fields A and field strength F 6/18

Setup QCD full theory (Euclidean) +ε µνρσ F µν F ρσ topological term Z QCD [da][dψ] exp[ Tr Ψ(/D + M)Ψ + FF + iθf F] with N f quarks Ψ of masses M, gauge fields A and field strength F integrate out quarks Z QCD Nf ν [da]ν f=1 det[d + m f] exp[ Tr F 2 + iθν] 6/18

Setup QCD full theory (Euclidean) +ε µνρσ F µν F ρσ topological term Z QCD [da][dψ] exp[ Tr Ψ(/D + M)Ψ + FF + iθf F] with N f quarks Ψ of masses M, gauge fields A and field strength F integrate out quarks Z QCD Nf ν [da]ν f=1 det[d + m f] exp[ Tr F 2 + iθν] properties of the Dirac operator: - diagonalise: Dψ k = iλ k ψ k in finite V, Euclidean D = D - index theorem: ν # zero modes winding # of A - sum over topology Z QCD ν Z ν exp[iθν] - {D, γ 5 } = 0: eigenvalues in pairs ±iλ k 6/18

Setup QCD full theory (Euclidean) +ε µνρσ F µν F ρσ topological term Z QCD [da][dψ] exp[ Tr Ψ(/D + M)Ψ + FF + iθf F] with N f quarks Ψ of masses M, gauge fields A and field strength F integrate out quarks Z QCD Nf ν [da]ν f=1 det[d + m f] exp[ Tr F 2 + iθν] properties of the Dirac operator: - diagonalise: Dψ k = iλ k ψ k in finite V, Euclidean D = D - index theorem: ν # zero modes winding # of A - sum over topology Z QCD ν Z ν exp[iθν] - {D, γ 5 } = 0: eigenvalues in pairs ±iλ k formally Z QCD = ν 0 [dλ] N f f=1 mν f eiνθ/n f k (λ2 k + m2 f ) exp[ Tr F 2 [λ]] 6/18

Start: chiral perturbation theory χpt for QCD Integration of all non-goldstone modes: in a box V = L 4 : valid for momenta 1/L Λ non-goldstone scale Z χpt SU(N f ) [du(x)] exp[ dxtr L(U, U)] expansion in higher orders L = L 2 + L 4 + L 6 +... ) L 2 = 1 4 F 2 α U(x) α U (x) + 1 2 (e ΣM i Θ N f U(x) + e i Θ N f U (x) LECs: Pion decay constant F & chiral condensate Σ M = diag(m u, m d,...) quark masses 7/18

Start: chiral perturbation theory χpt for QCD Integration of all non-goldstone modes: in a box V = L 4 : valid for momenta 1/L Λ non-goldstone scale Z χpt SU(N f ) [du(x)] exp[ dxtr L(U, U)] expansion in higher orders L = L 2 + L 4 + L 6 +... ) L 2 = 1 4 F 2 α U(x) α U (x) + 1 2 (e ΣM i Θ N f U(x) + e i Θ N f U (x) LECs: Pion decay constant F & chiral condensate Σ M = diag(m u, m d,...) quark masses standard expansion U(x) = exp[iπ k (x)σ k /F], Pion mass: m 2 πf 2 = Σ N f f=1 m f GOR relation 7/18

Start: chiral perturbation theory χpt for QCD Integration of all non-goldstone modes: in a box V = L 4 : valid for momenta 1/L Λ non-goldstone scale Z χpt SU(N f ) [du(x)] exp[ dxtr L(U, U)] expansion in higher orders L = L 2 + L 4 + L 6 +... ) L 2 = 1 4 F 2 α U(x) α U (x) + 1 2 (e ΣM i Θ N f U(x) + e i Θ N f U (x) LECs: Pion decay constant F & chiral condensate Σ M = diag(m u, m d,...) quark masses standard expansion U(x) = exp[iπ k (x)σ k /F], Pion mass: m 2 πf 2 = Σ N f f=1 m f GOR relation Fourier trafo: fix topology dθe iνθ SU(N f ) du = U(N f ) du det[u]ν 7/18

The ε-regime ε counting [Gasser, Leutwyler 87] m π 1 L 2 1 L = ε = V 4 (m 2 πv ) 1 = O(1) unphysical regime!! fig: [Bietenholz et al. physics/0309072] 8/18

The ε-regime ε counting [Gasser, Leutwyler 87] m π 1 L 2 1 L = ε = V 4 (m 2 πv ) 1 = O(1) unphysical regime!! fig: [Bietenholz et al. physics/0309072] BUT: we can do analytic, non-perturbative calculations 8/18

The ε-regime ε counting [Gasser, Leutwyler 87] m π 1 L 2 1 L = ε = V 4 (m 2 πv ) 1 = O(1) unphysical regime!! fig: [Bietenholz et al. physics/0309072] BUT: we can do analytic, non-perturbative calculations standard p regime counting: m π 1/L 8/18

Partition function of εχpt- zero mode dominance fluctuations from integrating quadratic term π k (p 2 + m 2 π)π k : ( ) O small for p 0 NOT for p = 0 1 V (p 2 +m 2 π) 9/18

Partition function of εχpt- zero mode dominance fluctuations from integrating quadratic term π k (p 2 + m 2 π)π k : ( ) O small for p 0 NOT for p = 0 1 V (p 2 +m 2 π) zero-momentum mode dominate: non-perturbative treatment parametrise U(x) = U 0 e iπ(x)/f ε-regime: L 2 exact & factorisation: Z ν,εχpt = U(N f ) du 0 det[u 0 ] ν e 1 2 ΣV Tr( M(U 0 +U 0 ) ) [dπ]e dx 1 2 ( π)2 9/18

Partition function of εχpt- zero mode dominance fluctuations from integrating quadratic term π k (p 2 + m 2 π)π k : ( ) O small for p 0 NOT for p = 0 1 V (p 2 +m 2 π) zero-momentum mode dominate: non-perturbative treatment parametrise U(x) = U 0 e iπ(x)/f ε-regime: L 2 exact & factorisation: Z ν,εχpt = U(N f ) du 0 det[u 0 ] ν e 1 2 ΣV Tr( M(U 0 +U 0 ) ) [dπ]e dx 1 2 ( π)2 Z ν,εχpt det 1,...,N f [ ] ˆm j 1 k I ν+j 1 ( ˆm k ) / Nf ( ˆm 2 f ) [Brower,Tan Rossi 81, etc], with ˆm = mv Σ, = Vandermonde 9/18

Partition function of εχpt- zero mode dominance fluctuations from integrating quadratic term π k (p 2 + m 2 π)π k : ( ) O small for p 0 NOT for p = 0 1 V (p 2 +m 2 π) zero-momentum mode dominate: non-perturbative treatment parametrise U(x) = U 0 e iπ(x)/f ε-regime: L 2 exact & factorisation: Z ν,εχpt = U(N f ) du 0 det[u 0 ] ν e 1 2 ΣV Tr( M(U 0 +U 0 ) ) [dπ]e dx 1 2 ( π)2 Z ν,εχpt det 1,...,N f [ ] ˆm j 1 k I ν+j 1 ( ˆm k ) / Nf ( ˆm 2 f ) [Brower,Tan Rossi 81, etc], with ˆm = mv Σ, = Vandermonde group integral part equivalent to RMT to LO: O(ε 0 ) 9/18

Limitations of RMT and corrections from εχpt ρ(λ) 3 ~V λ λ min m c Λ QCD chrmt - log λ fig: [Verbaarschot] breakdown at Thouless Energy λ c F 2 / V [Osborn, Verbaarschot 01] 10/18

Limitations of RMT and corrections from εχpt ρ(λ) 3 ~V λ λ min m c Λ QCD chrmt - log λ fig: [Verbaarschot] breakdown at Thouless Energy λ c F 2 / V [Osborn, Verbaarschot 01] corrections to RMT regime can be computed: 1-loop εχpt ( ) in Z corrections Σ eff = Σ 1 N2 f 1 (0) N f F, F eff =... in 1 V [Gasser, Leutwyler 87; G.A., Basile, Lellouch 08] spectral D-correlations from RMT with eff. LEC 10/18

Limitations of RMT and corrections from εχpt ρ(λ) 3 ~V λ λ min m c Λ QCD chrmt - log λ fig: [Verbaarschot] breakdown at Thouless Energy λ c F 2 / V [Osborn, Verbaarschot 01] corrections to RMT regime can be computed: 1-loop εχpt ( ) in Z corrections Σ eff = Σ 1 N2 f 1 (0) N f F, F eff =... in 1 V [Gasser, Leutwyler 87; G.A., Basile, Lellouch 08] spectral D-correlations from RMT with eff. LEC for Green s function π(x)π(0) : need εχpt[hansen 90, Damgaard et al. 01] 10/18

What can we learn from εχpt? LO: non-zero modes = Gaussian free fields overall constant 11/18

What can we learn from εχpt? LO: non-zero modes = Gaussian free fields overall constant study quark mass dependence of partition function: - Taylor expand in m q formal expression for Z QCD in terms of λ k Z ν ({m q }) = 0 [dλ] N f f=1 mν f k (λ2 k + m2 f ) exp[ Tr F 2 [λ]] - compare to group integral [ ] Z ν,εχpt det 1,...,N f ˆm j 1 k I ν+j 1 ( ˆm k ) / Nf ( ˆm 2 f ) 11/18

What can we learn from εχpt? LO: non-zero modes = Gaussian free fields overall constant study quark mass dependence of partition function: - Taylor expand in m q formal expression for Z QCD in terms of λ k Z ν ({m q }) = 0 [dλ] N f f=1 mν f k (λ2 k + m2 f ) exp[ Tr F 2 [λ]] - compare to group integral [ ] Z ν,εχpt det 1,...,N f ˆm j 1 k I ν+j 1 ( ˆm k ) / Nf ( ˆm 2 f ) Leutwyler-Smilga sum rules: ) m (1 ν + m 2 k 1 λ +... 2 k QCD 1 k V Σλ = 1 2 k QCD 4(ν+1) = I ν (m) 11/18

What can we learn from εχpt? LO: non-zero modes = Gaussian free fields overall constant study quark mass dependence of partition function: - Taylor expand in m q formal expression for Z QCD in terms of λ k Z ν ({m q }) = 0 [dλ] N f f=1 mν f k (λ2 k + m2 f ) exp[ Tr F 2 [λ]] - compare to group integral [ ] Z ν,εχpt det 1,...,N f ˆm j 1 k I ν+j 1 ( ˆm k ) / Nf ( ˆm 2 f ) Leutwyler-Smilga sum rules: ) m (1 ν + m 2 k 1 λ +... 2 k QCD 1 k V Σλ = 1 2 k QCD 4(ν+1) = I ν (m) computation of spectral 1-point and 2-point density possible by adding extra source quarks (fermionic and bosonic) next lecture 11/18

The Matrix Model of QCD in RMT computation of ALL spectral densities and individual eigenvalue distributions possible and much simpler 12/18

The Matrix Model of QCD in RMT computation of ALL spectral densities and individual eigenvalue distributions possible and much simpler Z ν, RMT m f iw dw Π N f f=1 det e NΣ2 TrWW iw [Shuryak, Verbaarschot 93] m f block matrix has same global symmetry as QCD-Dirac operator D: W ij C: N (N + ν) Gaussian random variables (chgue) 2N + ν = V eigenvalues: N ±λ k, ν zero eigenvalues 12/18

The Matrix Model of QCD in RMT computation of ALL spectral densities and individual eigenvalue distributions possible and much simpler Z ν, RMT m f iw dw Π N f f=1 det e NΣ2 TrWW iw [Shuryak, Verbaarschot 93] m f block matrix has same global symmetry as QCD-Dirac operator D: W ij C: N (N + ν) Gaussian random variables (chgue) 2N + ν = V eigenvalues: N ±λ k, ν zero eigenvalues universal large N V (volume) limit: lim N Z ν,rmt = Z ν,εχpt 12/18

The Matrix Model of QCD in RMT computation of ALL spectral densities and individual eigenvalue distributions possible and much simpler Z ν, RMT m f iw dw Π N f f=1 det e NΣ2 TrWW iw [Shuryak, Verbaarschot 93] m f block matrix has same global symmetry as QCD-Dirac operator D: W ij C: N (N + ν) Gaussian random variables (chgue) 2N + ν = V eigenvalues: N ±λ k, ν zero eigenvalues universal large N V (volume) limit: lim N Z ν,rmt = Z ν,εχpt equivalence of other objects than Z? - all Dirac eigenvalue correlations [Damgaard et al 01, Basile, G.A. 07] 12/18

The Matrix Model of QCD in RMT computation of ALL spectral densities and individual eigenvalue distributions possible and much simpler Z ν, RMT m f iw dw Π N f f=1 det e NΣ2 TrWW iw [Shuryak, Verbaarschot 93] m f block matrix has same global symmetry as QCD-Dirac operator D: W ij C: N (N + ν) Gaussian random variables (chgue) 2N + ν = V eigenvalues: N ±λ k, ν zero eigenvalues universal large N V (volume) limit: lim N Z ν,rmt = Z ν,εχpt equivalence of other objects than Z? - all Dirac eigenvalue correlations [Damgaard et al 01, Basile, G.A. 07] different εχpt-χsb, classes: W ij R, H: RMT still solvable 12/18

Large-N limit and equivalence to εχpt Σ = 1 for simplicity: Z ν,rmt = dw N f f det[ww + m 2 WW f ]e NTr 13/18

Large-N limit and equivalence to εχpt Σ = 1 for simplicity: Z ν,rmt = dw N f f det[ww + m 2 WW f ]e NTr step 1. Grassmann det[...] = dψ exp[ψ... ψ] do Gauß dw 13/18

Large-N limit and equivalence to εχpt Σ = 1 for simplicity: Z ν,rmt = dw N f f det[ww + m 2 WW f ]e NTr step 1. Grassmann det[...] = dψ exp[ψ... ψ] do Gauß dw step 2. ψ 4 Hubbard-Stratonovich: extra dq Nf N f do dψ: Z ν,rmt dqdet[q ] ν det [ Q Q ] N e NTr(Q Q M(Q+Q )) 13/18

Large-N limit and equivalence to εχpt Σ = 1 for simplicity: Z ν,rmt = dw N f f det[ww + m 2 WW f ]e NTr step 1. Grassmann det[...] = dψ exp[ψ... ψ] do Gauß dw step 2. ψ 4 Hubbard-Stratonovich: extra dq Nf N f do dψ: Z ν,rmt dqdet[q ] ν det [ Q Q ] N e NTr(Q Q M(Q+Q )) step 3. Saddle Point N : parametrise Q = UR, at SP: R 1, + scale masses Nm f Z ν,rmt du U(Nf ) det[u ] ν e NTrM(U+U ) 0-dimensional σ-model 13/18

RMT eigenvalue representation Z ν,rmt dw Π N f f=1 det m f iw iw m f e NTrW jw j diagonalise WW positive definite matrix : eigenvalues λ k 0 (or singular values of W : y k with y 2 k = λ k Dirac eigenvalues Z ν,rmt 0 N k dλ kλ ν k e NΣ2 λ k Nf f (λ k + m 2 f ) N(λ) 2 integrand P jpdf joint probability distribution 14/18

RMT eigenvalue representation Z ν,rmt dw Π N f f=1 det m f iw iw m f e NTrW jw j diagonalise WW positive definite matrix : eigenvalues λ k 0 (or singular values of W : y k with y 2 k = λ k Dirac eigenvalues Z ν,rmt 0 N k dλ kλ ν k e NΣ2 λ k Nf f (λ k + m 2 f ) N(λ) 2 integrand P jpdf joint probability distribution Vandermonde determinant N (λ) = k>l (λ k λ l ) = exp[2 k>l log[λ k λ l ]] eigenvalues strongly coupled: log-gas, repulsion of eigenvalues 14/18

Results from RMT exhibits flavour-topology duality [Verbarschot]: lim m 0 Z (N f) ν /m ν Z (N f 1) ν+1 - this can also be shown on the level of the εχptpartition function [ADDV 01] 15/18

Results from RMT exhibits flavour-topology duality [Verbarschot]: lim m 0 Z (N f) ν /m ν Z (N f 1) ν+1 - this can also be shown on the level of the εχptpartition function [ADDV 01] e.g. two massless flavours at ν = 0 = quenched n f = 2 at ν = 2 valid only to LO in the epsilon regime!! note that in general we take the chiral limit as lim m 0, V mv Σ finite 15/18

Results from RMT exhibits flavour-topology duality [Verbarschot]: lim m 0 Z (N f) ν /m ν Z (N f 1) ν+1 - this can also be shown on the level of the εχptpartition function [ADDV 01] e.g. two massless flavours at ν = 0 = quenched n f = 2 at ν = 2 valid only to LO in the epsilon regime!! note that in general we take the chiral limit as lim m 0, V mv Σ finite define spectral density of Dirac eigenvalues y = λ: insert δ ρ(y) = Trδ(D y) = N δ(y 1 y) dy 2... dy N P jpdf ({y}) - can be computed exactly for finite-n 15/18

Exercise 1st eigenvalue distribution of the smallest eigenvalue p 1 (y): from gap probability = probability that all eigenvalues are > λ: E(λ) = 1 Z λ N N f dλ k λ ν λ k k e NΣ2 (λ k + m 2 f ) N(λ) 2 k=1 f λ E(λ) is the probability that 1 eigenvalue is at λ and all others are λ 16/18

Exercise 1st eigenvalue distribution of the smallest eigenvalue p 1 (y): from gap probability = probability that all eigenvalues are > λ: E(λ) = 1 Z λ N N f dλ k λ ν λ k k e NΣ2 (λ k + m 2 f ) N(λ) 2 k=1 f λ E(λ) is the probability that 1 eigenvalue is at λ and all others are λ Exercise: check for ν = 0 that the following holds for Dirac eigenvalues 1) for N f = 0 derive p 1 (x) = x/2e x2 /4 with x = 2NΣy 2) derive p 1 (x) for arbitrary N f > 0 16/18

Some literature H. Leutwyler, A. Smilga Phys Rev D46 (1992) 5607-5632 E. Shuryak, J. Verbaarschot, Random matrix theory and spectral sum rules for the Dirac operator in QCD hep-th/9212088 = Nucl.Phys.A560:306-320,1993 Jacobus Verbaarschot The spectrum of the QCD Dirac operator and chiral random matrix theory: the threefold way, hep-th/9401059 = Phys.Rev.Lett. 72 (1994) 2531-2533 G.A., P. H. Damgaard, U. Magnea, S. Nishigaki Universality of random matrices in the microscopic limit and the Dirac operator spectrum hep-th/9609174 = Nucl.Phys.B487:721-738,1997 17/18

Lecture 2 spectral statistics from εχptand from RMT inclusion of chemical potential - why χptis sensitive to baryonic µ further extensions: Wilson χpt 18/18