Lecture 6: Modeling of MIMO Channels Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1. Overview. CommTh/EES/KTH

Similar documents
Lecture 6: Modeling of MIMO Channels Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1

Lecture 5: Antenna Diversity and MIMO Capacity Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1. Overview. CommTh/EES/KTH

Lecture 8: MIMO Architectures (II) Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1. Overview. Ragnar Thobaben CommTh/EES/KTH

Lecture 9: Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1. Overview. Ragnar Thobaben CommTh/EES/KTH

Lecture 9: Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1

Lecture 7 MIMO Communica2ons

Multiple Antennas. Mats Bengtsson, Björn Ottersten. Channel characterization and modeling 1 September 8, Signal KTH Research Focus

12.4 Known Channel (Water-Filling Solution)

Maximum Achievable Diversity for MIMO-OFDM Systems with Arbitrary. Spatial Correlation

Transmit Directions and Optimality of Beamforming in MIMO-MAC with Partial CSI at the Transmitters 1

Multiple Antennas in Wireless Communications

Single-User MIMO systems: Introduction, capacity results, and MIMO beamforming

Information Theory for Wireless Communications, Part II:

ELEC E7210: Communication Theory. Lecture 10: MIMO systems

Solution to Homework 1

EE401: Advanced Communication Theory

ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Week 3. Flat Fading Channels Envelope Distribution Autocorrelation of a Random Process

Capacity of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems in wireless communications

A Signal-Space Analysis of Spatial Self-Interference Isolation for Full-Duplex Wireless

Space-Time Coding for Multi-Antenna Systems

The Optimality of Beamforming: A Unified View

Estimation of Performance Loss Due to Delay in Channel Feedback in MIMO Systems

Lecture 2. Fading Channel

Implementation of a Space-Time-Channel-Filter

Emmanouel T. Michailidis Athanasios G. Kanatas

Multi-User Gain Maximum Eigenmode Beamforming, and IDMA. Peng Wang and Li Ping City University of Hong Kong

Advanced Topics in Digital Communications Spezielle Methoden der digitalen Datenübertragung

926 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH Monica Nicoli, Member, IEEE, and Umberto Spagnolini, Senior Member, IEEE (1)

ELG7177: MIMO Comunications. Lecture 8

Optimum Transmission Scheme for a MISO Wireless System with Partial Channel Knowledge and Infinite K factor

COMPLEX CONSTRAINED CRB AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEMI-BLIND MIMO AND OFDM CHANNEL ESTIMATION. Aditya K. Jagannatham and Bhaskar D.

Limited Feedback-based Unitary Precoder Design in Rician MIMO Channel via Trellis Exploration Algorithm

On the MIMO Channel Capacity Predicted by Kronecker and Müller Models

Capacity Region of the Two-Way Multi-Antenna Relay Channel with Analog Tx-Rx Beamforming

Exploiting Partial Channel Knowledge at the Transmitter in MISO and MIMO Wireless

Full Rank Spatial Channel Estimation at Millimeter Wave Systems

Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Systems

Multi-Input Multi-Output Systems (MIMO) Channel Model for MIMO MIMO Decoding MIMO Gains Multi-User MIMO Systems

L interférence dans les réseaux non filaires

Beam Discovery Using Linear Block Codes for Millimeter Wave Communication Networks

Limited Feedback in Wireless Communication Systems

Parallel Additive Gaussian Channels

Trust Degree Based Beamforming for Multi-Antenna Cooperative Communication Systems

Optimal Transmit Strategies in MIMO Ricean Channels with MMSE Receiver

CHANNEL FEEDBACK QUANTIZATION METHODS FOR MISO AND MIMO SYSTEMS

Comparisons of Performance of Various Transmission Schemes of MIMO System Operating under Rician Channel Conditions

Multi-Input Multi-Output Systems (MIMO) Channel Model for MIMO MIMO Decoding MIMO Gains Multi-User MIMO Systems

CS6956: Wireless and Mobile Networks Lecture Notes: 2/4/2015

POWER ALLOCATION AND OPTIMAL TX/RX STRUCTURES FOR MIMO SYSTEMS

On the Optimality of Multiuser Zero-Forcing Precoding in MIMO Broadcast Channels

Performance Analysis for Strong Interference Remove of Fast Moving Target in Linear Array Antenna

On the Throughput of Proportional Fair Scheduling with Opportunistic Beamforming for Continuous Fading States

ELEC546 MIMO Channel Capacity

Massive MIMO: Signal Structure, Efficient Processing, and Open Problems II

Evaluation of Suburban measurements by eigenvalue statistics

Double-Directional Estimation for MIMO Channels

Reduced Complexity Space-Time Optimum Processing

Morning Session Capacity-based Power Control. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Maryland

Downlink Precoding for Massive MIMO Systems Exploiting Virtual Channel Model Sparsity

On Limits of Multi-Antenna. Wireless Communications in. Spatially Selective Channels

VECTOR QUANTIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR MULTIPLE-ANTENNA CHANNEL INFORMATION FEEDBACK

Massive MIMO Channel Modeling

ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Week 4. Envelope Correlation Space-time Correlation

Lecture 7: Wireless Channels and Diversity Advanced Digital Communications (EQ2410) 1

SPARSE MULTIPATH MIMO CHANNELS: PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS BASED ON MEASUREMENT DATA

Efficient Signaling Schemes for Wideband Space-time Wireless Channels Using Channel State Information

Tight Lower Bounds on the Ergodic Capacity of Rayleigh Fading MIMO Channels

MIMO Capacity of an OFDM-based system under Ricean fading

Secure Degrees of Freedom of the MIMO Multiple Access Wiretap Channel

Upper Bounds on MIMO Channel Capacity with Channel Frobenius Norm Constraints

Power and Complex Envelope Correlation for Modeling Measured Indoor MIMO Channels: A Beamforming Evaluation

Transmit Diversity for Arrays in Correlated Rayleigh Fading

On the Required Accuracy of Transmitter Channel State Information in Multiple Antenna Broadcast Channels

Root-MUSIC Time Delay Estimation Based on Propagator Method Bin Ba, Yun Long Wang, Na E Zheng & Han Ying Hu

Parametric Characterization and Estimation of Dispersive Multi-Path Components with SAGE in Radio Propagation Channel

The Dirty MIMO Multiple-Access Channel

2318 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 54, NO. 6, JUNE Mai Vu, Student Member, IEEE, and Arogyaswami Paulraj, Fellow, IEEE

A Sparseness-Preserving Virtual MIMO Channel Model

Low Resolution Adaptive Compressed Sensing for mmwave MIMO receivers

Rate-Optimum Beamforming Transmission in MIMO Rician Fading Channels

Anatoly Khina. Joint work with: Uri Erez, Ayal Hitron, Idan Livni TAU Yuval Kochman HUJI Gregory W. Wornell MIT

USING multiple antennas has been shown to increase the

SPARSE signal representations have gained popularity in recent

Advanced 3 G and 4 G Wireless Communication Prof. Aditya K Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Lecture 4 Capacity of Wireless Channels

Hybrid Analog-Digital Beamforming for Massive MIMO Systems

Lecture 2. Capacity of the Gaussian channel

Under sum power constraint, the capacity of MIMO channels

INVERSE EIGENVALUE STATISTICS FOR RAYLEIGH AND RICIAN MIMO CHANNELS

A DIFFUSION MODEL FOR UWB INDOOR PROPAGATION. Majid A. Nemati and Robert A. Scholtz. University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA

Massive MIMO As Enabler for Communications with Drone Swarms

A Precoding Method for Multiple Antenna System on the Riemannian Manifold

Homework 5 Solutions. Problem 1

Random Matrices and Wireless Communications

Random Access Protocols for Massive MIMO

Time Reversal Transmission in MIMO Radar

ECE 8201: Low-dimensional Signal Models for High-dimensional Data Analysis

Channel. Feedback. Channel

CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF DOUBLY DISPERSIVE MIMO CHANNELS. Gerald Matz

Wireless Communications

Transcription:

: Theoretical Foundations of Wireless Communications 1 Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:00-12:00, Conference Room SIP 1 Textbook: D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication 1 / 1 Overview Lecture 5: Spatial Diversity, MIMO Capacity SIMO, MISO, MIMO Degrees of freedom MIMO capacity : MIMO Channel Modeling 2 / 1

Overview Motivation: How does the multiplexing capability of MIMO channels depend on the physical environment? When can we gain (much from MIMO? How do we have to design the system? 3 / 1 Physical Modeling Line-of-Sight : SIMO Free space without scattering and reflections. Antenna separation r λ c, with carrier wavelength λ c and the normalized antenna separation r ; n r receive antennas. Distance between transmitter and i-th receive antenna: d i Continuous-time impulse between transmitter and i-th receive antenna: h i (τ = a δ(τ d i /c Base-band model (assuming d i /c 1/W, signal BW W : ( h i = a exp j 2πfcd ( i = a exp j 2πd i c λ c SIMO model: y = h x + w, with w CN (0, N 0I h: signal direction, spatial signature. 4 / 1

Physical Modeling Line-of-Sight : SIMO Paths are approx. parallel, i.e., d i d + (i 1 r λ c cos(φ Directional cosine Ω = cos(φ Spatial signature can be expressed as ( h = a exp j 2πd λ c Phased-array antenna. SIMO capacity (with MRC C = log (1 + P h 2 N 0 1 exp( j2π r Ω exp( j2π2 r Ω. exp( j2π(n r 1 r Ω ( = log 1 + Pa2 n r N 0 Only power gain, no degree-of-freedom gain. 5 / 1 Physical Modeling Line-of-Sight : MISO Similar to the SIMO case: t, λ c, d i, φ, Ω,... MISO channel model: y = h x + w, with w CN (0, N 0. Channel vector ( h = a exp j 2πd λ c 1 exp( j2π tω exp( j2π2 tω. exp( j2π(n t 1 tω Unit spatial signature in the directional cosine Ω: e(ω = 1/ n [1, exp( j2π Ω,..., exp( j2π(n 1 Ω] T e t(ω t and e r(ω r with n t, t and n r, r, respectively. 6 / 1

Physical Modeling Line-of-Sight : MIMO Linear transmit and receive array with n t, t and n r, r. Gain between transmit antenna k and receive antenna i h ik = a exp ( j2πd ik /λ c Distance between transmit antenna k and receive antenna i d ik = d + (i 1 r λ c cos(φ r (k 1 tλ c cos(φ t MIMO channel matrix (with Ω t = cos(φ t and Ω r = cos(φ r H = a ( n tn r exp j 2πd e r(ω r e t(ω t λ c H is a rank-1 matrix with singular value λ 1 = a n tn r Compare with SVD decomposition in Lecture 5: H = k λ i u i vi i=1 7 / 1 Physical Modeling Line-of-Sight : MIMO MIMO capacity ( C = log 1 + Pa2 n r n t N 0 Only power gain, no degree-of-freedom gain. n t = 1: power gain equals n r receive beamforming. n r = 1: power gain equals n t transmit beamforming. General n t, n r : power gain equals n r n t Transmit and receive beamforming. Conclusion: In LOS environment, MIMO provides only a power gain but no degree-of-freedom gain. 8 / 1

Physical Modeling Geographically Separated Antennas at the Transmitter Example/special case (D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communications. 2 distributed transmit antennas, attenuations a 1, a 2, angles of incidence φ r 1, φr 2, negligible delay spread. Spatial signature (n r receive antennas ( h k = a k nr exp j 2πd 1k e r(ω rk λ c Channel matrix H = [h 1, h 2] H has independent columns as long as (Ω r i = cos(φ r i Ω r = Ω r 2 Ω r 1 0 mod 1 r Two non-zero singular values λ 2 1, λ 2 2; i.e., two degrees of freedom. But H can still be ill-conditioned! 9 / 1 Physical Modeling Geographically Separated Antennas at the Transmitter Conditioning of H is determined by how the spatial signatures are aligned (with L r = n r r : cos(θ = f r (Ω r2 Ω r1 = e r(ω r1 e r(ω r2 = sin(πl r Ω r }{{} n r sin(πl r Ω r /n r =f r (Ω r2 Ω r1 Example (a 1 = a 2 = a λ 2 1 = a 2 n r (1 + cos(θ λ 2 2 = a 2 n r (1 cos(θ λ 1 λ 2 = 1 + cos(θ 1 cos(θ f r (Ω r is periodic with n r /L r. Maximum at Ω r = 0; f r (0 = 1. f r (Ω r = 0 at Ω r = k/l r with k = 1,..., n r 1. Resolvability 1/L r, if Ω r 1/L r, then the signals from the two antennas cannot be resolved. 10 / 1

Physical Modeling Geographically Separated Antennas at the Transmitter Beamforming pattern Assumption: signal arrives with angle φ 0; receive beamforming vector e r(cos(φ 0. A signal form any other direction φ will be attenuated by a factor (D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communications. e r(cos(φ 0 e r(cos(φ = f r (cos(φ cos(φ 0 Beamforming pattern ( φ, f r (cos(φ cos(φ 0 Main lobes around φ 0 and any angle φ for which cos(φ = cos(φ 0. In a similar way, separated receive antennas can be treated. 11 / 1 Physical Modeling LOS Plus One Reflected Path Direct path: φ t1, Ω r1, d (1, and a 1. Reflected path: φ t2, Ω r2, d (2, and a 2. Channel model follows from signal superposition with H = a b 1e r(ω r1e t(ω t1 + a b 2e r(ω r2e t(ω t2, a b i H has rank 2 as long as = a i ntn r exp ( j (i 2πd. λ c Ω t1 Ω t2 mod 1 t and Ω r1 Ω r2 mod 1 r. H is well conditioned if the angular separations Ω t, Ω r at the transmit/receive array are of the same order or larger than 1/L t,r. 12 / 1

Physical Modeling LOS Plus One Reflected Path Direct path: φ t1, Ω r1, d (1, and a 1. Reflected path: φ t2, Ω r2, d (2, and a 2. H can be rewritten as H = H H, with H = [a b 1e r(ω r1, a b 2e r(ω r2] and H = [ et (Ω t1 e t (Ω t2 Two imaginary receivers at points A and B (virtual relays. Since the points A and B are geographically widely separated, H and H have rank 2 and hence H has rank 2 as well. Furthermore, if H and H are well-conditioned, H will be well-conditioned as well. Multipath fading can be viewed as an advantage which can be exploited! ] 13 / 1 Physical Modeling LOS Plus One Reflected Path Significant angular separation is required at both the transmitter and the receiver to obtain a well-conditioned matrix H. If the reflectors are close to the receiver (downlink, we have a small angular separation not very well-conditioned matrix H. Similar, if the reflectors are close to the transmitter (uplink. Size of an antenna array at a base station will have to be many wavelengths to be able to exploit the spatial multiplexing effect. 14 / 1

Physical Modeling Summary 15 / 1 Fading General Concept Antenna lengths L t, L r limit the resolvability 2 of the transmit and receive antenna in the angular domain. Sample the angular domain at fixed angular spacings of 1/L t at the transmitter and 1/L r at the receiver. Represent the channel (the multiple paths in terms of these input and output coordinates. The (k, l-th channel gain follows as the aggregation of all paths whose transmit and receive directional cosines lie in a (1/L t 1/L r bin around the point (l/l t, k/l r. 2 Note, if Ω r,t 1/L r,t, the paths cannot be separated. 16 / 1

Fading Angular Domain Representation (ADR Orthonormal basis for the received signal space (n r basis vectors { S r = e r(0, e 1 r(,..., e r( nr 1 } L r L r Orthogonality follows directly from the properties of f r (Ω. Orthonormal basis for the transmitted signal space (n t basis vectors { S t = e t(0, e 1 t(,..., e t( nt 1 } L t L t Orthogonality follows directly from the properties of f t(ω. Orthonormal bases provide a very simple (but approximate decomposition of the total received/transmitted signal up to a resolution 1/L r, 1/L t. 17 / 1 Fading Angular Domain Representation Examples: Receive beamform patterns of the angular basis vectors in S r (a Critically spaced ( r = 1/2, each basis vector has a single pair of main lobes. (b Sparsely spaced ( r > 1/2, some of the basis vectors have more than one pair of main lobes. (c Densely spaced ( r < 1/2, some of the basis vectors have no pair of main lobes. 18 / 1

Fading ADR of MIMO (Assumption: critically spaced antennas Observation: The vectors in S t and S r form unitary matrices U t and U r with dimensions (n t n t and (n r n r, respectively. ( IDFT matrices! With 3 x a = U t x and y a = U r y we get y a = U r HU tx a + U r w = H a x a + w a, with w a CN (0, N 0I nr. Furthermore, with H = i ab i e r(ω ri e t(ω ti, we get h a kl = e r(k/l r H e t(l/l t = i ai b [e r(k/l r e r(ω ri ] [e t(ω ti e t(l/l t] }{{}}{{} (1 (2 The terms (1 and (2 are significant for the i th path if Ω ri k < 1 and L r L Ω ti k < 1. r L t L t ( Projections on the basis vectors in S r, S t. 3 The superscript a denotes angular domain quantities. 19 / 1 Fading Statistical Modeling in the Angular Domain Let T l and R k be the sets of physical paths which have most energy in directions of e t(l/l t and e r(k/l r. hkl a corresponds to the aggregated gains ai b of paths which lie in R k T l. Independence and time variation Gains of the physical paths ai b [m] are independent. The path gains hkl a [m] are independent across m. The angles {φ ri [m]} m and {φ ti [m]} m evolve slower than a b i [m]. The physical paths do not move from one angular bin to another. The path gains h kl [m] are independent across k and l. If there are many paths in an angular bin Central Limit Theorem h a kl[m] can be modeled as complex circular symmetric Gaussian. If there are no paths in an angular bin h a kl[m] 0. Since U t and U r are unitary matrices, the matrix H has the same i.i.d. Gaussian distribution as H a. 20 / 1

Fading Statistical Modeling in the Angular Domain Example for H a (a Small angular spread at the transmitter. (b Small angular spread at the receiver. (c Small angular spread at both transmitter and receiver. (d Full angular spread at both transmitter and receiver. 21 / 1 Fading Degrees of Freedom and Diversity Degrees of freedom Based on the derived statistical model, we get the following result: with probability 1, the rank of the random matrix H a is given by rank(h a = min{ number of non-zero rows, number of non-zero columns }. The number of non-zero rows and columns depends on two factors: Amount of scattering and reflection; the more scattering and reflection, the larger the number of non-zero entries in H a. Lengths L r and L t; for small L r, L t many physical paths are mapped into the same angular bin; with higher resolution, more paths can be represented. Diversity: The diversity is given by the number of non-zero entries in H a. Example: Same number of degrees of freedom but different diversity. 22 / 1

Fading Antenna Spacing So far: critically spaced antennas with r = 1/2. One-to-one correspondence between the angular windows and the resolvable bins. Setup 1: vary the number of antennas for a fixed array length L r,t. Sparsely spaced case ( r > 0.5 Beamforming patterns of some basis vectors have multiple main lobes. Different paths with different directions are mapped onto the same basis vector. Resolution of the antenna array, number of degrees of freedom, and diversity are reduced. Densely spaced case ( r < 0.5 There are basis vectors with no main lobes which do not contribute to the resolvability. Adds zero rows and columns to H a and creates correlation in H. Setup 2: vary the antenna separation for a fixed number of antennas. Rich scattering: number of non-zero rows in H a is already n r ; i.e., no improvement possible. Clustered scattering: scattered signal can be received in more bins; i.e., increasing number of degrees of freedom. 23 / 1