Construction Exits Rock pads

Similar documents
Construction Exits Vibration grids

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

Coarse Sediment Traps

U-Shaped Sediment Traps

Type 1 System Sheet Flow Sandy Soils Type 2 System Concentrated Flow Clayey Soils Type 3 System [1] Supplementary Trap Dispersive Soils

Chutes Part 5: Rock linings

Sediment Weirs (Instream)

Stormwater Inlet Sediment Traps

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

Instream Sediment Control Systems

Rock Sizing for Batter Chutes

Rock Sizing for Multi-Pipe & Culvert Outlets

Rock Sizing for Small Dam Spillways

Soil Erosion and Sediment Control. Basic Principles and Practices

Stormwater Outlet Sediment Traps

Rock Sizing for Drainage Channels

Specifications Whitcomb Elementary School Demolition January 15, 2016

Rock Sizing for Waterway & Gully Chutes

Orica Australia Pty Ltd Ammonium Nitrate Facility Upgrade

Erosion and Sediment Control Field Guide for Builders. Version 3, January 2013

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

Erosion and Sediment Control Measures 2.7 Silt Fences

B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Track design and management

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

Suitable Applications Sediment traps should be considered for use:

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

CONSTRUCTION EXIT SEDIMENT BARRIER

Central Queensland Coal Project Appendix 4b Geotechnical Assessment. Environmental Impact Statement

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Independent Environmental Audit Erosion and Sediment Control


Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University

**Temporary Erosion Control**

The results of KCB s site inspection observations and our recommendations for further work are presented herein.

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

Instream Erosion Control General

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Woodford County Erosion Prevention Plan and Permit. Application #

Rock Sizing for Bank Stabilisation

APPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION

1.0 INSPECTION ANNUAL INSPECTION, JUNE 29, 2011 CARMACKS COPPER PROJECT, CARMACKS, YUKON. Dear Mr. West-Sells,

MIDDLESEX COUNTY Department of Planning and Community Development P.O. Box 427, Saluda, VA Phone: Fax:

Storm Sewer Design [2]

ADDENDA #1 CONTRACT # C May 3, 2013 Page 1 of 1

NOTES ON SUBBASE AGGREGATE SPECIFICATION TNZ M/3. These notes must not be included in the Contract Documents.

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION

Use of Rock in Stormwater Engineering. Version 3, July 2017

August 10, 2007 File:

Sediment Control Practices. John Mathews Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Soil and Water Resources

CHAPTER FIVE 5.0 STABILITY OF CUT SLOPES IN THE STUDY AREA. them limited by a thick canopy of vegetation and steep slope angles.

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

CITY OF BEAVER DAM SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICY

City of Saginaw Right of Way Division Snow and Ice Removal Policy January 18, 2016

Traffic Control Weather Policy

1 PROJECT BACKGROUND. August 14, Alberta Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

QUICK REFERENCE FOR PRECAUTIONARY TREATMENT DECISION MAKING

APPENDIX G APPENDIX G SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DESIGN RATIONALE

Chapter 7 Mudflow Analysis

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

The Mechanics Of Sediment Basin Operation

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS

This report was prepared by Klohn Crippen Consultants Ltd. for Alberta Transportation Central Region under Contract No. CE053/2000.

Rock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope

Erosion and Sediment Control A Field Guide for Construction Site Managers. Version 6, July 2017

APPENDIX A: EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL FORMS

Erosion and Sediment Control Plan

FINAL REPORT NO.54. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - Coastal Reclamation. Tauranga City Council. Private Bag Tauranga 16 August

Agenda. INDOT Office of Environmental Services. Describe Results of FHWA QAR. Landscape and Waterway Permitting Unit. Interviews Site Inspections

WELCOME Lake Wabukayne OPEN HOUSE

Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological Performance and Suspended Solids

OXFORD HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN

January 17, 2008 File:

Stormwater Work Projects 2013

Mass Wasting. Revisit: Erosion, Transportation, and Deposition

Mass Wasting. Requirements for Mass Wasting. Slope Stability. Geol 104: mass wasting

AGENDA ITEM 6 APPENDIX /0151/DET GROUND WATER & SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

SNOW CONTROL OPERATIONS

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant)

Landslide Mitigation (BYUI)

Chapter 7 Mudflow Analysis

5. Which surface soil type has the slowest permeability rate and is most likely to produce flooding? A) pebbles B) sand C) silt D) clay A) B) C) D)

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES. Page

Need of Proper Development in Hilly Urban Areas to Avoid

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Waitarere Beach Road Curves Project Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment of Effects

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

Crows Landing Naval Base Easement

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized?

December 11, 2006 File:

Location Restriction Demonstration

Transcription:

Construction Exits Rock pads SEDIMENT CONTROL TECHNIQUE Type 1 System Sheet Flow Sandy Soils Type 2 System Concentrated Flow [1] Clayey Soils Type 3 System Supplementary Trap Dispersive Soils [1] Minor concentrated flows passing down the access track towards the rock pad must be diverted off the rock pad towards a suitable sediment trap (Photo 3). Symbol or Photo 1 Stabilised rock pad construction exit Photo 2 Stabilised rock pad construction exit Key Principles 1. Rock pad dimensions and rock specifications are different for small building sites compared to construction sites. 2. Rock pads on small building sites primarily act as all-weather parking surfaces that aim to minimise the initial attachment of dirt and mud to tyres. 3. Rock pads on construction sites primarily act as sediment traps that aim to strip from vehicle tyres any dirt and mud that has attached to tyres. 4. Sediment trapping ability is directly related to the volume of open voids between the rocks, which is related to the uniformity of the rock size, and the length and depth of the rock pad. The width of the rock pad is generally of less importance. Design Information Table 1 provides the recommended dimensions of rock pads. Table 1 Rock pad dimensions Parameter Construction Sites Building Sites Minimum width 3m (single lane) or 2.5m per lane 2m Minimum length (where practical) 15m 10m Minimum thickness of rock 200mm 150mm Rock size (avoid 75 100mm) 50 75mm, or 100 150mm 40 75mm Catchments & Creeks Pty Ltd Version 2 - April 2010 Page 1

Figure 1 shows the typical layout of a rock pad suitable for construction sites. Guidelines on the design of entry/exit rock pads for small building sites are provided in the separate fact sheet for building sites (refer to Miscellaneous fact sheets). Figure 1 Rock pad construction exit for civil construction sites (a) Specification of rock To the maximum degree practical, the rock size must be near uniform to maximise the available void spacing. Rock size of 50 to 75mm is best used only for small soil disturbances and low truck usage. For larger sites a rock size of 100 to 150mm is preferred. Specifying a nominal rock size of 75 to 100mm is likely to result in the presence of some smaller rocks of a size that can catch between dual tyres, even though rounded rock of 100mm diameter is unlikely to cause a problem. Figure 2: Good rock selection Figure 3: Poor rock selection Photo 3 Example of suitable rocks for construction site rock pads Photo 4 Warning sign for truck drivers regarding rocks hooked up in dual tyres Catchments & Creeks Pty Ltd Version 2 - April 2010 Page 2

(b) Drainage control In circumstances where surface runoff from the work site is directed towards the rock pad (i.e. where the rock pad is down-slope of the soil disturbance), a drainage berm (bund) must be constructed across the rock pad to direct this runoff to a suitable sediment trap (Figure 5). The type of sediment trap being appropriate for the catchment area and erosion hazard. The location of this flow control berm (up-slope end, middle, or down-slope end) depends on site topography and the location of the associated sediment trap. The mountable flow control berm should have side slopes not exceeding 5:1 (H:V) batters. Figure 4: Rock Pad without flow diversion Figure 5: Rock Pad with flow diversion Photo 5 Flow control berm Photo 6 Pipe to pass up-slope runoff under a rock pad Photo 7 Drain down-slope of rock pad directing sediment-laden runoff to a nearby sediment trap. Photo 8 Rock pad with adjacent, gravelled site entry footpath Catchments & Creeks Pty Ltd Version 2 - April 2010 Page 3

(c) Alternative designs An alternative rock pad design is presented in Figure 6. This concept utilises the moderate speed properties of a traditional rock pad with the low maintenance properties of a vibration grid. The intent here is to extend the design life of a rock pad by establishing a large sediment storage volume beneath the rocks. Further alternatives are discussed in the separate fact sheet for Vibration Grids. On-site trials of this and other designs are required to develop the optimum high-efficiency, low-maintenance design. Figure 6 Alternative low-maintenance rock pad design (concept still under development) (d) Pedestrian safety The rock pad must be made safe for expected pedestrian traffic, especially if the rock pad crosses an open footpath (Figure 1). This is usually done by covering large rocks (100 150mm) with 25 50mm aggregate/gravel. Such measures are only required in circumstances where potential risks to pedestrian are considered to exit. (e) Maintenance All stabilised construction exits require regular maintenance, including sediment removal, and rock replacement. Photo 9 Heavy sedimentation of rock pad adjacent a vibration grid Photo 10 Heavy sedimentation should not be allowed to occur at construction exits prior to their maintenance Catchments & Creeks Pty Ltd Version 2 - April 2010 Page 4

Description Construction exit is a general term referring to rock pads, vibration grids and wash bays. Rock pads consist of a short length of roadway covered with crushed rock. Rock pads have been referred to under a variety of names including stabilised construction exits, entry/exit pads, gravel pads and rumble pads. The term rumble pad is a misnomer because few rock pads are able to significantly rumble or vibrate heavy trucks. Purpose Rock pads on building sites primarily act as all-weather parking surfaces that aim to minimise the attachment of dirt and mud to tyres. Rock pads on construction sites primarily act as sediment traps that aim to strip from vehicle tyres any dirt and mud that has attached to tyres. Stabilised construction exits are one of the few sediment control measures that are required during both wet and dry weather. Limitations Rock pads are supplementary sediment traps typically of low sediment trapping efficiency. Sediment trapping efficiency is generally related to the soil type and weather conditions. Rock pads can be ineffective if the soils are highly cohesive (sticky) clays. Advantages A sediment control technique that generally does not interfere with construction activities. Various alternative designs exist that can be adapted to the site conditions. On building site the rock pad can act as an all weather parking area. Disadvantages Requires regular maintenance, including placement or addition of more rock. It is common for these systems to experience less than ideal maintenance. Rock pads can interfere with road construction if located at the permanent site entry point. Location Located at site entry points, or where vehicles pass from unsealed roads onto sealed roads. It is important to locate the construction exit such that vehicles cannot bypass the rock pad when exiting the site. Avoid placing site rock pads on steep grades. The construction site entry/exit point may not necessarily be located at the permanent site entry/exit point. Common Problems Inadequate maintenance. Rocks too small, or not uniform in grading, resulting in rapid sediment blockage. Gravel used instead of uniformly-sized, crushed rock. Sediment not regularly removed from the rock pad. Drainage not adequately controlled at the entry/exit point, allowing sediment-laden stormwater runoff to wash onto public roads. Special Requirements If the entry/exit point is down-slope of the soil disturbance or parts of the access road, then the rock pad must contain a flow control berm to deflect sediment-laden runoff to an adjacent sediment trap. The rock pad must not become a source of sediment runoff onto the adjacent road. It is noted that entry only points can still allow sediment to be washed off site. Thus adequate sediment and drainage controls will be required. A square-edged shovel and large stiffbristled broom must be available on-site for maintenance. The rock must be placed on filter cloth (minimum bidim A24 or equivalent) if placed on clayey or unstable soils. Site Inspection Check for excessive sedimentation on the rock pad. Check for sediment tacked onto the road. Check if an additional layer of rock is required. Ensure surface runoff is directed to a suitable sediment trap. Catchments & Creeks Pty Ltd Version 2 - April 2010 Page 5

Materials Rock: well graded, hard, angular, erosion resistant rock, nominal diameter of 50mm to 75mm (small disturbances) or 100 to 150mm (large disturbances). All reasonable measures must be taken to obtain rock of near uniform size. Footpath stabilising aggregate: 25 to 50mm gravel or aggregate. Geotextile fabric: heavy-duty, needlepunched, non-woven filter cloth ( bidim A24 or equivalent). Installation 1. Refer to approved plans for location and dimensional details. If there are questions or problems with the location, dimensions, or method of installation, contact the engineer or responsible onsite officer for assistance. 2. Clear the location of the rock pad, removing stumps, roots and other vegetation to provide a firm foundation so that the rock is not pressed into soft ground. Clear sufficient width to allow passage of large vehicles, but clear only that necessary for the exit. Do not clear adjacent areas until the required erosion and sediment control devices are in place. 3. If the exposed soil is soft, plastic or clayey, place a sub-base of crushed rock or a layer of heavy-duty filter cloth to provide a firm foundation. 4. Place the rock pad forming a minimum 200mm thick layer of clean, open-void rock. 5. If the associated construction site is upslope of the rock pad, thus causing stormwater runoff to flow towards the rock pad, then form a minimum 300mm high flow control berm across the rock pad to divert such runoff to a suitable sediment trap. 6. The length of the rock pad should be at least 15m where practicable, and as wide as the full width of the entry or exit and at least 3m. The rock pad should commence at the edge of the off-site sealed road or pavement. 7. Flare the end of the rock pad where it meets the pavement so that the wheels of turning vehicles do not travel over unprotected soil. 8. If the footpath is open to pedestrian movement, then cover the coarse rock with fine aggregate or gravel, or otherwise take whatever measures are needed to make the area safe. Maintenance 1. Inspect all site entry and exit points prior to forecast rain, daily during extended periods of rainfall, after runoff-producing rainfall, or otherwise at fortnightly intervals. 2. If sand, soil, sediment or mud is tracked or washed onto the adjacent sealed roadway, then such material must be physically removed, first using a square-edged shovel, and then a stiffbristled broom, and then by a mechanical vacuum unit, if available. 3. If necessary for safety reasons, the roadway shall only be washed clean after all reasonable efforts have been taken to shovel and sweep the material from the roadway. 4. When the voids between the rock becomes filled with material and the effectiveness of the rock pad is reduced to a point where sediment is being tracked off the site, a new 100mm layer of rock must be added and/or the rock pad must be extended. 5. Ensure any associated drainage control measures (e.g. flow control berm) are maintained in accordance with their desired operational conditions. 6. Dispose of sediment and debris in a manner that will not create an erosion or pollution hazard. Removal 1. The rock pad should be removed only after it is no longer needed as a sediment trap. 2. Remove materials and collected sediment and dispose of in a suitable manner that will not cause an erosion or pollution hazard. 3. Re-grade and stabilise the disturbed ground as necessary to minimise the erosion hazard. Catchments & Creeks Pty Ltd Version 2 - April 2010 Page 6