Implementation of Real-Time Monitoring and Warning of Near-Earth Space Dangerous Events by Roscosmos. I. Oleynikov, V. Ivanov, and M.

Similar documents
9 th US/Russian Space Surveillance Workshop

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIA ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE ON REAL SITUATION AT HIGH NEAR-EARTH ORBITS

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

on space debris objects obtained by the

The use of ASPOS OKP System in the interests of ensuring the safety of space operations and increasing awareness about the situation in high orbits

Asia-Pacific ground-base Optical Satellite Observation System APOSOS

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

Contribution of ISON and KIAM space debris. space

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

Orbital Debris Challenges for Space Operations J.-C. Liou, PhD NASA Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

A Space Debris Alert System for Aviation. US Patent pending Inventor: T. Sgobba - ESA Independent Safety Office

Achievements of Space Debris Observation

USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates

Overview of JAXA Activities on Sustainable Space Development and Space Situational Awareness

The NEO problem: activities in Russia

GEO protected region: ISON capabilities to provide informational support for tasks of spacecraft flight safety and space debris removal

ON THE NATIONAL PROGRAM TO COUNTERACT SPACE THREATS

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

Orbital Debris Mitigation

SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN INDIA

Space Debris Re-entries and Aviation Safety

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Modeling Updates

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

Space Debris Assessment for USA-193

CIVIL PROTECTION AND SAFE SKY

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

How to Improve Small Satellite Missions in Two Easy Steps:

STUDY THE SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE EARLY STAGES OF THE NANO-SATELLITE DESIGN

A/AC.105/C.2/2015/CRP.18

SOLVING THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) MOTION CONTROL LONG-TERM PLANNING PROBLEM

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

Swiss Contributions to a Better Understanding of the Space Debris Environment

METHODS OF BALLISTIC SUPPORT AND SUPERVISION OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS OF FOTON SC

Sirius talks Space economy: urgent need for new global regulation? Space Policy

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

Commercial SSA Catalog Performance

Accuracy Assessment of SGP4 Orbit Information Conversion into Osculating Elements

SPACE DEBRIS CHASER CONSTELLATION

Fifty Years of Operational Environmental Satellites: The U.S. Experience

On strategy for the development of the Russian Federation activities in the Antarctic for the period until 2020 and longer-term perspective

Orbital Debris Observation via Laser Illuminated Optical Measurement Techniques

The Characteristics and Consequences of the Break-up of the Fengyun-1C Spacecraft

Yahsat s Approach to GEO Collision Avoidance A Case Stduy with STTW-4

IADC Re-Entry Prediction Campaigns

Information furnished in conformity with the Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space

International Cooperation in Operational Environmental Satellites: The U.S. Experience

SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES

Collision Risk Assessment for Spacecraft with CASS

Space Debris Mitigation Activities at ESA in 2013

DARPA Perspective on Space Situational Awareness

Conjunction Risk Assessment and Avoidance Maneuver Planning Tools

Space Debris Reentry Hazards

International Space Station (ISS) Nears A Six-Figure Orbit Count

Implementation of the Outer Space Treaties in view of Small Satellites

PREDICTING THE ATMOSPHERIC RE-ENTRY OF SPACE DEBRIS THROUGH THE QB50 ENTRYSAT MISSION

PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUTOFF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Panel on the Challenge of Orbital Debris

TESTIMONY BEFORE. HOUSE CO1MfITTEE ON SCIENCE AND ASTRONAUTICS SUBCOWITTEE ON SPACE SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS. Dr. John W.

RUSSIAN EARTH OBSERVATION MISSIONS: satellites, ground segment and data access evolution

P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute Astro Space Center Russian Academy of Sciences S.A. Lavochkin Association, Roscosmos RADIOASTRON

Capabilities of observation facilities of Altay opticlaser center in the problem of space debris surveillance

SLR-based orbit determination and orbit prediction of space debris objects

CAPACITY BUILDING FOR NON-NUCLEAR ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES. (Submitted by RSMC-Beijing) Summary and purpose of document

Thank you for your purchase!

PERFORMANCES OF ATMOSPHERIC DENSITY MODELS DURING SATELLITE REENTRY PREDICTION CAMPAIGNS AT SUNSPOT MINIMUM

Space Debris. New Mexico. Supercomputing Challenge. Final Report. Team 78. Mesa Middle School. Team Members. Justice Armijo.

Modeling of the Orbital Debris Environment Risks in the Past, Present, and Future

SMARTnet: First Experience of Setting Up a Telescope System to Survey the Geostationary Ring ,

Weather Information for Surface Transportation (WIST): Update on Weather Impacts and WIST Progress

DEBRIS IMPACT ON LOW EARTH ORBIT SPACE MISSION

ISS Intergovernmental Agreement

Spacecraft design indicator for space debris

Space weather studies in the Russian Academy of Sciences S.A. Bogachev, V.D. Kuznetsov, L.M Zelenyi. Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation

Update on NASA NEO Program

FSA report to the CCSDS Management Council Noordwijk, Netherlands, October Federal Space Agency Vladimir Grishin

A Summary of the Galaxy 15 Incident and its Impact on Space Sustainability

SAFETY GUIDED DESIGN OF CREW RETURN VEHICLE IN CONCEPT DESIGN PHASE USING STAMP/STPA

Design of a Radar Based Space Situational Awareness System

Tailoring the Observation Scenarios and Data Processing Techniques for Supporting Conjunction Event Assessments

Unit 5: NWS Hazardous Weather Products. Hazardous Weather and Flooding Preparedness

8.11 Satellites. Figure 1 Artifi cial satellites provide valuable monitoring and communication services for humankind.

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

Eutelsat practice & views on long term sustainability. COPUOS/SCST - LTS Workshop Vienna, 14 February 2013

The Precursor Services of ESA s Space Situational Awareness NEO programme (SSA-NEO)

SPACE DEBRIS REMOVAL

Space Debris Activities in India

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

Development of Laser Measurement to Space Debris at Shanghai SLR Station

SATELLITE RE-ENTRY PREDICTION PRODUCTS FOR CIVIL PROTECTION APPLICATIONS. C. Pardini & L. Anselmo

MONITORING VARIATIONS TO THE NEAR-EARTH SPACE ENVIRONMENT DURING HIGH SOLAR ACTIVITY USING ORBITING ROCKET BODIES

Space Systems Space Debris Mitigation

ESA s activities related to the meteoroid environment

Consideration of Solar Activity in Models of the Current and Future Particulate Environment of the Earth

NOAA Surface Weather Program

BUILDING LOW-COST NANO-SATELLITES: THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROPER ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS CAMPAIGN. Jose Sergio Almeida INPE (Brazil)

Challenges of Space Debris and Site Selection Criteria to Install Optical Telescope to Observe Space Debris in Sri Lanka

Transcription:

Implementation of Real-Time Monitoring and Warning of Near-Earth Space Dangerous Events by Roscosmos I. Oleynikov, V. Ivanov, and M. Astrakhantsev A lot of uncontrolled man-made objects, which regularly threaten the safety of the spacecraft s (SC) flight, were generated in the near earth space (NES) area in recent years. In order to solve this problem Russia developed a system for real-time monitoring and warning of near-earth space dangerous events (ASPOS). The main goal of this system is to send space operators warnings about the possible dangerous collisions with uncontrolled space objects. The main design work on the given system include (pic.1): 1) Development of technologies for acquisition, processing, and transfer to the user of the information obtained from the different sources. 2) Continuous improvement of the national databases and space debris model. 3) ASPOS integration with foreign NES monitoring systems. 4) Development of observation systems operating in the various spectral bands and deployed at different sites, namely integration of the following assets in the system: а) ground and space-based optoelectronic equipment б) ground radar equipment Real-time monitoring and warning of NES dangerous events for mission control by TSNIIMASH FSUE Development of technologies for information acquisition, processing and transfer to users Continuous improvement of national space objects data bases and space debris model Information interoperability with foreign NES monitoring systems Development and updating of observation systems operating in various spectral bands and deployed at different sites pict.1 Each work is a separate complicated task, which needs a realization of careful science researches during its implementation. The space debris generation and distribution model is to be continuously updated, and the space debris fragments catalog is modified taking into account the formation of new information sources, new system subscribers, and growth of the NES space debris population. So the main work on the system design is to combine different observation systems, the acquisition, processing and transfer systems, and the computing facilities into one structure, which should guarantee the safety of any spacecraft, and has the possibility of the integration with foreign analogues.

Functional scheme of ASPOS is shown on pict.2 RAS and Roscosmos facilities Space monitoring facilities ASPOS segments SC control sectors ASPOS backbone Roscosmos pict.2 The picture shows the cooperation between the main system s elements and the information consumers. Also, the picture presents some technologies in the structural connections and element s decomposition which were applied during the process of system design. 1) Emphasis is on the central core, which is responsible for the coordination of all actions between system s main elements and where the main computations are conducted. Also, the central core sends space operators warnings about the dangerous proximity with an uncontrolled space object, and sends Roscosmos the report about system s work. 2) Information from the observation facilities is received by the central core through separate segments, where a reduction and filtration of this information is implemented. This structure allows to avoid big changes in the central core s internal organization with the new information sources connection, and also allows to decrease the account of computations in the central core, which makes its more operative. The ASPOS system s structure enables to solve the following problems: 1) Regular tracking of man-made space debris object motion, which presents a certain danger for manned and unmanned spacecraft, with processing and analysis of information received from various sources; 2) Detection and prediction of NES dangerous event dynamics (proximity and deorbit events, etc.); 3) Monitoring of spent SLV, booster and SC removal to disposal zones; 4) Providing Roscosmos with the information insupport of Russia s participation in international reentry space object test campaigns. The regular space objects monitoring is fulfilled by the space monitoring facilities of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Russian Space Agency. The uninterrupted information exchange between the ASPOS backbone and other observation facilities enables responds to any NES dangerous event (proximity and deorbit events), and to instantly notify the spacecraft operators. The ASPOS Data Base contains information on 16,000 space objects with complete practicable data enabling the system s backbone to solve such problems as safety control support of the ISS and Roscosmos constellation missions in the test mode (Resurs-DK, Coronal-Foton, Sterkh, GLONASS, Eelectro-L and Luch satellites).

In 2011 around 3,000 space debris object proximity events with Russian spacecraft were monitored due to the ASPOS system operation results. The International Space Station fulfilled 4 avoidance maneuvers within the framework of the joint NASA - Russia ISS mission safety control program. The problems of ballistic and information support of deorbiting space objects, with identification of their impact time and areas, are solved at the high level. For 2011-2012 over 100 derobits were tracked, including three space object deorbits during international test campaigns. It is intended to complement the system with the Roscosmos facilities (6 telescopes) by mid 2013. According to the native and foreign experience in our days, there are some approved technologies of receiving information: -low-orbit area, in the most cases, is controlled by radar stations; -high-altitude area is controlled by optoelectronic stations; The utilization of the space-based and naval facilities can make the observation facilities more effective. The mobility of the sea based facilities will increase the accuracy of the object s orbit determination. The equator parallel motion of the sea-based facility helps to reduce the amount of the invisible space areas. The motion transversely to equator allows to observe objects with inclinations which are invisible for fixed stations. Space based facilities increase the amount and the accuracy of the measurements thanks to the lack of influence of the atmosphere and weather conditions. The utilization of the different based observation facilities becomes the popular tendency in the process of its modernization. Now the USA and Canada use extensively the utilization of different based observation facilities in the process of space area monitoring. From the end of 2011 to the beginning of the 2012 years ASPOS was engaged in some international deorbit and reentry campaigns, where it demonstrated the ability of the international cooperation for solving the serious problems related with the space area pollution. Phobos-Grunt reentry operations tracking (pict.3) IADC DB USSTRACOM SpaceTrack RF SMS Observatories NOAA IZMIRAN Ballistic Centers: RF MoD RAS IAM Operative group, Roscosmos by ASPOS support Lavochkin NPO FSUE Russian Foreign Ministry Russian Ministry for Emergency Management International community pict.3

Due to the engine failure, the Phobos-Grunt spacecraft remained in LEO and couldn t be further used as designated. Taking into consideration its limited orbital active service life, the Roscosmos management decided to organize real-time tracking of the Phobos-Grunt flight and deorbit with the prediction of impact time and area of its unburnt fragments. The main calculations were made by the TSNIIMASH Mission Control Center (MCC) using the Automated System for NES Dangerous Event Warning. The scheme of interaction between the participants is shown above. The MCC used the following information as input data : - Trajectory data from the RF Space Monitoring System (RFSMS) and space observatories and SC TLE format orbital data from Internet accessible sources; - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) information; - Impact time and area prediction data from the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute ot Applied Mathematics (RAS IAM) and Russian Federation Ministry of Defence (RF MoD).; Using this input information the TSNIIMASH MCC regularly specified the SC orbital parameters predicting the SC impact time and area. The SC primary contractor the Lavochkin NPO - calculated SC fragmentation at its reentry, and its unburnt fragments scatter on the basis of the TSNIIMASH impact prediction data. Regularly updated data on SC motion and its descent were operatively transmitted to Roscosmos and the Ministry for Emergency Management, then the Roscosmos transmitted the information to the Foreign Ministry which informed the world countries on the territory of which the SC unburnt fragments could fall. At the time of the Roscosmos Operative Group activity, the IADC organized the International Test Campaign for tracking Phobos-Grunt deorbit and predicting its impact, with the participation of 11 nations-iadc members which started its work on January 2, 2012. As a result the previous information was enhanced by trajectory tracking data from many countries (including the USA, Germany, France and others) and entered into the IADC Database. After this RF SMS began to send the information to the IADC Database. As one can see, thanks to the operative interaction of many organizations, including international ones, it became possible to solve a very complex challenge of tracking SC reentry, which presented a serious threat to inhabitants of the areas of its probable impact. One should note that the TSNIIMASH MCC made a significant contribution (ASPOS) to the Russian Express-AM4 SC splashdown operations after failure to put the spacecraft in the designated orbit and use it as designed. First of all the TSNIIMASH MCC calculated the risk of Express-AM4 collision with operating spacecraft, and as a result it was found that the given spacecraft presents a serious threat for many (486) operating spacecraft. The arising problem had to be solved as soon as possible. The two options were reviewed: - SC removal to a disposal orbit; - SC splashdown; The TSNIIMASH MCC analyzed a possible disposal orbit in terms of safety. As a result of the calculations made, it was found that the spacecraft on the selected orbit would threaten 37 active spacecraft. Though the number of spacecraft subject to threat presented by the Express- AM4 would have reduced greatly (almost by 13 times), the collision risk with the active spacecraft still existed. Accordingly, the most efficient decision was to execute a splashdown operation. Thanks to coordinated operations of all campaign participants, and despite the large number of restrictions concerning the Express-AM4 space vehicle, we managed to submerge the spacecraft in a pre-assigned Pacific Ocean area. The operations were fulfilled with participation of the Toulouse and Shabolovka Mission Control Centers, in close cooperation with the TSNIIMASH MCC (ASPOS), which analyzed conceivable actions, namely identification of probable splashdown areas, calculations of deceleration impulse modules and firing times. This

successful campaign proved the practicability of international cooperation in SC deorbit operations. Another confirmation of the successful cooperation in dangerous space object deorbit tracking operations is Russia s (TSNIIMASH MCC s) participation in the international test campaigns organized by IADC. These are the Russian Phobos-Grunt deorbit tracking and the German RORSAT and American UARS tracking campaigns. These operations were conducted under a thoroughly elaborated consistent plan, according to which each campaign member used its space monitoring assets for SC orbit determination, and then entered the obtained vectors in Internet so that the other members could use this information. The ASPOS backbone predicted space object impact area as soon as the space object orbit data came. The tables contain the prediction data obtained by the latest space object orbit determinations and the results of assessing the impact time, as compared with the data obtained by the other test campaign members. In that way during the last couple years ASPOS participates not only in the ensuring of the Roscosmos spacecraft safety, but also in the international campaigns, like the ensuring of the ISS safe flight and the tracking of the object s reentries. The Russian Space Monitoring System (SMS) is the second in the world in terms of number of observation facilities. On the whole it can augment the USA SMS on non-controlled orbits, when tracking extremely dangerous space objects. It may be exemplified by the Phobos- Grunt tracking when on the 1097 th orbit (final one) of its service life only the Russian space monitoring facilities obtained measurement data. Moreover, while conducting joint campaigns, the leading space-faring nations established operative partnership, thus demonstrating how to solve complex tasks. Currently such a partnership is exercised only within the framework of ISS mission support operations. It implies joint orbit determination for the accuracy enhancement of dynamic operations conduct and interaction, when the ISS is in a threatening proximity with a risk object, thus substantially improving the mission safety. It is likely that in the future all the world leading space-faring nations will exchange data with the purpose of establishing an international space environment information exchange system. The ASPOS OKP system, deployed at the TSNIIMASH MCC, is available for cooperation with the international partners for combining operations of the national space activity safety control systems, with the purpose of space debris risk mitigation, and can provide information support of Russia s participation in international Impacting space object test campaigns.

Literature: 1) Report, 30th IADS meeting, Monreal, 2012