Impact of International Information Technology Transfer on National Productivity. Online Supplement

Similar documents
Vectorautoregressive Model and Cointegration Analysis. Time Series Analysis Dr. Sevtap Kestel 1

Licenciatura de ADE y Licenciatura conjunta Derecho y ADE. Hoja de ejercicios 2 PARTE A

Lecture 5. Time series: ECM. Bernardina Algieri Department Economics, Statistics and Finance

Testing for a Single Factor Model in the Multivariate State Space Framework

A Specification Test for Linear Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models

Ready for euro? Empirical study of the actual monetary policy independence in Poland VECM modelling

Two-stage Benchmarking of Time-Series Models for. Small Area Estimation. Danny Pfeffermann, Richard Tiller

Financial Econometrics Kalman Filter: some applications to Finance University of Evry - Master 2

Explaining Total Factor Productivity. Ulrich Kohli University of Geneva December 2015

How to Deal with Structural Breaks in Practical Cointegration Analysis

Macroeconomic Theory Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Fall 2005 ANSWER EACH PART IN A SEPARATE BLUE BOOK. PART ONE: ANSWER IN BOOK 1 WEIGHT 1/3

Unit Root Time Series. Univariate random walk

Time Series Test of Nonlinear Convergence and Transitional Dynamics. Terence Tai-Leung Chong

Do Steel Consumption and Production Cause Economic Growth?: A Case Study of Six Southeast Asian Countries

Remittances and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh

( ) ( ) ( ) ( u) ( u) = are shown in Figure =, it is reasonable to speculate that. = cos u ) and the inside function ( ( t) du

Mean Reversion of Balance of Payments GEvidence from Sequential Trend Break Unit Root Tests. Abstract

( ) (, ) F K L = F, Y K N N N N. 8. Economic growth 8.1. Production function: Capital as production factor

Chickens vs. Eggs: Replicating Thurman and Fisher (1988) by Arianto A. Patunru Department of Economics, University of Indonesia 2004

Wednesday, November 7 Handout: Heteroskedasticity

The general Solow model

Solutions to Odd Number Exercises in Chapter 6

What Ties Return Volatilities to Price Valuations and Fundamentals? On-Line Appendix

COMPETITIVE GROWTH MODEL

Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) Chart Based on Six Delta Initiatives

Introduction D P. r = constant discount rate, g = Gordon Model (1962): constant dividend growth rate.

Lecture 6 - Testing Restrictions on the Disturbance Process (References Sections 2.7 and 2.10, Hayashi)

Excel-Based Solution Method For The Optimal Policy Of The Hadley And Whittin s Exact Model With Arma Demand

Problem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2017 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

D.I. Survival models and copulas

Robert Kollmann. 6 September 2017

Solutions: Wednesday, November 14

Solutionbank Edexcel AS and A Level Modular Mathematics

Dynamic Econometric Models: Y t = + 0 X t + 1 X t X t k X t-k + e t. A. Autoregressive Model:

Lecture 3: Solow Model II Handout

An introduction to evolution PDEs November 16, 2018 CHAPTER 5 - MARKOV SEMIGROUP

Department of Economics East Carolina University Greenville, NC Phone: Fax:

Kriging Models Predicting Atrazine Concentrations in Surface Water Draining Agricultural Watersheds

International Parity Relations between Poland and Germany: A Cointegrated VAR Approach

Cointegration and Implications for Forecasting

ACE 562 Fall Lecture 4: Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation. by Professor Scott H. Irwin

Chapter 2 The Derivative Applied Calculus 107. We ll need a rule for finding the derivative of a product so we don t have to multiply everything out.

Affine term structure models

Georey E. Hinton. University oftoronto. Technical Report CRG-TR February 22, Abstract

Econ Autocorrelation. Sanjaya DeSilva

Types of Exponential Smoothing Methods. Simple Exponential Smoothing. Simple Exponential Smoothing

1. Consider a pure-exchange economy with stochastic endowments. The state of the economy

Chapter 16. Regression with Time Series Data

Probabilistic Robotics

Augmented Reality II - Kalman Filters - Gudrun Klinker May 25, 2004

The Simple Linear Regression Model: Reporting the Results and Choosing the Functional Form

Økonomisk Kandidateksamen 2005(II) Econometrics 2. Solution

Distribution of Estimates

A unit root test based on smooth transitions and nonlinear adjustment

Robust critical values for unit root tests for series with conditional heteroscedasticity errors: An application of the simple NoVaS transformation

Time series Decomposition method

GINI MEAN DIFFERENCE AND EWMA CHARTS. Muhammad Riaz, Department of Statistics, Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad,

THE MONEY DEMAND IN ROMANIA. PhD. Cornelia Tomescu Dumitrescu University Constantin Brancusi from Tg-Jiu, Romania, Faculty of Economics

Homework Solution Set # 3. Thursday, September 22, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Lalo, Second Volume Complement G X

Appendix to Creating Work Breaks From Available Idleness

R t. C t P t. + u t. C t = αp t + βr t + v t. + β + w t

Institutional Assessment Report Texas Southern University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences "P1-Aggregate Analyses of 6 cohorts ( )

Outline. lse-logo. Outline. Outline. 1 Wald Test. 2 The Likelihood Ratio Test. 3 Lagrange Multiplier Tests

Green accounting: Green NNP and genuine savings

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND

A multivariate labour market model in the Czech Republic 1. Jana Hanclová Faculty of Economics, VŠB-Technical University Ostrava

Some Basic Information about M-S-D Systems

Testing for nonlinear causation between capital inflows and domestic prices

Introduction to Mobile Robotics

Testing for linear cointegration against nonlinear cointegration: Theory and application to Purchasing power parity

Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation: a Correction * Tom Coupé

Methodology. -ratios are biased and that the appropriate critical values have to be increased by an amount. that depends on the sample size.

A New Unit Root Test against Asymmetric ESTAR Nonlinearity with Smooth Breaks

(10) (a) Derive and plot the spectrum of y. Discuss how the seasonality in the process is evident in spectrum.

Decomposing Value Added Growth Over Sectors into Explanatory Factors

Lecture 10 Estimating Nonlinear Regression Models

1. (16 points) Answer the following derivative-related questions. dx tan sec x. dx tan u = du d. dx du tan u. du tan u d v.

The General Linear Test in the Ridge Regression

GMM - Generalized Method of Moments

Information and estimation in Fokker-Planck channels

Professorial Chair Lecture. Don Santiago Syjuco Distinguished Professorial Chair in Economics

International Journal of Computer Science Trends and Technology (IJCST) Volume 3 Issue 6, Nov-Dec 2015

Final Exam. Tuesday, December hours

Robust estimation based on the first- and third-moment restrictions of the power transformation model

A Re-Examination of the Exchange Rate Disconnect Puzzle: Evidence from Firm Level Data 1

Linear Combinations of Volatility Forecasts for the WIG20 and Polish Exchange Rates

Exponential Smoothing

Granger Causality Among Pre-Crisis East Asian Exchange Rates. (Running Title: Granger Causality Among Pre-Crisis East Asian Exchange Rates)

Exponential Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) Chart Under The Assumption of Moderateness And Its 3 Control Limits

Problem Set #3: AK models

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Cointegration in Theory and Practice. A Tribute to Clive Granger. ASSA Meetings January 5, 2010

Distribution of Least Squares

Laplace transfom: t-translation rule , Haynes Miller and Jeremy Orloff

Suggested Solutions to Assignment 4 (REQUIRED) Submisson Deadline and Location: March 27 in Class

On the extent of the market: a Monte Carlo study and an application to the United States egg market. Aklesso Egbendewe-Mondzozo

(a) Set up the least squares estimation procedure for this problem, which will consist in minimizing the sum of squared residuals. 2 t.

Nonstationary Time Series Data and Cointegration

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Spike-count autocorrelations in time.

The Real Exchange Rate, Real Interest Rates, and the Risk Premium. Charles Engel University of Wisconsin

Transcription:

Impac of Inernaional Informaion Technology Transfer on Naional Prouciviy Online Supplemen Jungsoo Park Deparmen of Economics Sogang Universiy Seoul, Korea Email: jspark@sogang.ac.kr, Tel: 82-2-705-8697, Fax: 82-2-704-8599 Seung Kyoon Shin College of Business Aminisraion Universiy of Rhoe Islan 7 ippi Roa, Kingson, RI 02881-0802 Email: shin@uri.eu; Phone: (401) 874-5543 Fax: (401) 874-4312 G. awrence Saners Deparmen of Managemen Science & Sysems School of Managemen Sae Universiy of New York a Buffalo Buffalo, NY 14260-4000 Email: mgsan@buffalo.eu; Phone: (716) 645-2373; Fax: (716) 645-6117 1

Par 1: Measuremen errors. Due o he qualiy changes which are no compleely reflece in he marke price of inpus an oupu, measuremen errors may exis in calculaing TFP. Suppose ha here are qualiy improvemens in inpus an oupu where Y*, K*, * are efine as he oupu, capial an labor in qualiy-ajuse efficiency unis, respecively. The correc specificaion of he proucion funcion woul hen be as follows: * N Y = A λ K * β * 1 β As Y, K, are observe variables, we have he following relaionships beween observe an unobserve qualiy-ajuse variables. Y * = c ( ) Y, Y K * = c ( ) K, K * = c ( ), where c Y (), c K (), an c () are unmeasure qualiy ajusmen over ime for each variable. To simplify he iscussion, we assume ha he qualiy increases over ime are geomerically consan. j c j c ( ) = e, for j * * * β *(1 β ) = Y, K,. We efine he qualiy-ajuse TFP (TFP*) as TFP Y /( K ). Then TFP* an measure TFP in his suy woul have he following relaions. logtfp = c c c + logtfp * Y K = * Since logtfp = log A + log( λ ), he correc moel specificaion woul be N logtfp = ( c c c ) + log A + N Y K log( λ) The correc specificaion shows ha log of TFP shoul have a ime ren. This implies ha our moel specificaion using (3.3) shoul resul in a non-saionary error erm because he erm ( c c c is omie. In oher wors, i shoul fail o show a coinegraing relaionship. However, Y K ) 2

since mos of our esimae moels show coinegraing relaionships, we can conjecure ha c0 c K c is very minimal an hus he mismeasuremen is minor. Par 2: Peroni s (1999) panel coinegraion es. The iscussion in his appenix raws heavily on he panel coinegraion es presene in Peroni (1999). Reaers shoul consul he original aricle for furher eails. The firs sep involves esimaing he appropriae levels, say equaion (5.1), for each counry i o obain an esimae resiual series e i. The secon process involves ifferencing he levels equaion once in orer o obain he resiuals, v i. This proceure obains an esimae of he long-run variances of v i, 2 vi (), using a kernel esimaor (choosing sample covariance weighs appropriaely). The hir sep involves running he following Augmene Dickey Fuller regressions for each counry i: p i Δ e = ρe + γ Δ e + u. (A1) i i i, 1 ik i, k i k = 1 The nex sep is o compue he variance of he resiual series an enoe i by s *2 ui (). Given ha s * 1 N *2 N su() i N i = 1, compue he following es saisic as N T 1/2 N T * * 2 2 2 2 N, T N v( i) i, 1 v( i) i, 1 Δ i, 1 i= 1 = 1 i= 1 = 1, (A2) Z s e e e where N is he number of counries an T is he lengh of each counry series. Base on * Z NT,, we obain he panel coinegraion es saisics, Ψ NT,, by applying he mean ajusmen, μ, an variance ajusmen, ω, repore in Peroni (1999, Table 2). The panel coinegraion es saisic * Z NT, μ N Ψ NT, = (A3) ω has a sanar normal isribuion. 3

Par 3: Esimaions wih alernaive epreciaion raes for IT socks (10 an 15 percen) 1) Esimaion resuls wih 10 percen epreciaion raes for IT socks. Table 1A. Panel Toal Facor Prouciviy Esimaion (Depenen Variable: log(tfp)) Moel (i) Moel (ii) Moel (iii) Moel (iv) log(s ): Domesic IT capial sock 0.160*** 0.081*** 0.101*** 0.080*** (0.021) (0.018) (0.021) (0.019) log(s sum ): Simple sum of impore IT 0.024 (0.031) log(s i ): Impor-weighe sum of foreign counry s IT 0.065*** concenraion (0.011) log(s i-ith ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from IT-inensive counries 0.082*** (0.013) log(s i IT ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from less ITinensive 0.004 counries (0.004) log(s i TechH ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from hi-ech expor counries 0.052*** (0.013) 0.012 log(s i Tech ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from less hi-ech expor counries (0.007) Observaions 351 341 337 341 Number of Counries 39 38 38 38 Ajuse R 2 0.522 0.563 0.560 0.565 Coinegraion es Panel ADF saisics 4.182 4.258 5.785 4.527 Decision CI e CI CI CI a log(x) is log of X. Sanar errors are in he parenheses. b All esimaions inclue unrepore counry-specific consans. c *, **, an *** enoe significance a he 10, 5, an 1 percen levels, respecively. Panel ADF saisic is from Peroni (1999), which has asympoic normal isribuion. e CI represens panel coinegraion. 4

Table 2A. Panel TFP Esimaion Base on IT-Inensive Foreign IT sock (S i ITH ) (Depenen Variable: log(tfp)) Moel (i) Moel (ii) Moel (iii) Moel (iv) Moel (v) Moel (vi) Moel (vii) e log(s ) 0.090*** 0.076*** 0.089*** 0.064*** 0.060*** 0.061*** 0.067*** (0.016) (0.016) (0.015) (0.015) (0.015) (0.015) (0.020) log(s i ITH ) 0.075*** 0.066*** 0.059*** 0.055*** 0.050*** 0.049*** 0.048** (0.012) (0.012) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.019) imp 0.234*** 0.211*** 0.192*** 0.193*** 0.200** (0.073) (0.069) (0.069) (0.069) (0.092) ifi 0.542*** (0.098) pa 0.631*** 0.402** 0.427*** 0.398*** (0.116) (0.160) (0.160) (0.151) pc 0.141** 0.126* 0.132* (0.068) (0.068) (0.072) el 0.041** 0.037* (0.019) (0.020) Observaions 341 331 338 329 329 329 293 Number of counries 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 Ajuse R 2 0.574 0.578 0.611 0.600 0.606 0.613 0.501 Coinegraion es Panel ADF 3.953 2.168 4.036 3.609 3.291 2.430 saisics Decision CI CI CI CI CI CI N/A a log(x) is log of X. Sanar errors are in he parenheses. b All esimaions inclue unrepore counry-specific consans. c Sanar errors are in he parenheses. *, **, an *** enoe significance a he 10, 5, an 1 percen levels, respecively. Panel ADF saisic is from Peroni (1999) which has asympoic normal isribuion. CI represens panel coinegraion while N enoes no coinegraion. e Moel (vii) is he resul from insrumenal variables meho (IV) regression. 5

2) Esimaion resuls wih 15 percen epreciaion raes for IT socks Table 3B. Panel Toal Facor Prouciviy Esimaion: Depenen Variable: log(tfp) Moel (i) Moel (ii) Moel (iii) Moel (iv) log(s ): Domesic IT capial sock 0.154*** 0.077*** 0.095*** 0.076*** (0.020) (0.018) (0.021) (0.018) log(s sum ): Simple sum of impore IT 0.030 (0.030) log(s i ): Impor-weighe sum of foreign counry s IT 0.065*** concenraion (0.011) log(s i-ith ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from IT-inensive counries 0.083*** (0.013) log(s i IT ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from less ITinensive 0.003 counries (0.004) log(s i TechH ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from hi-ech expor counries 0.053*** (0.013) 0.011 log(s i Tech ): Impor-weighe sum of IT from less hi-ech expor counries (0.007) Observaions 351 341 337 341 Number of Counries 39 38 38 38 Ajuse R 2 0.518 0.561 0.558 0.563 Coinegraion es Panel ADF saisics 4.858 4.318 5.553 4.898 Decision CI e CI CI CI a log(x) is log of X. Sanar errors are in he parenheses. b All esimaions inclue unrepore counry-specific consans. c *, **, an *** enoe significance a he 10, 5, an 1 percen levels, respecively. Panel ADF saisic is from Peroni (1999), which has asympoic normal isribuion. e CI represens panel coinegraion. 6

Table 4B. Panel TFP Esimaion Base on IT-Inensive Foreign IT sock (S i ITH ): Depenen Variable: log(tfp) Moel (i) Moel (ii) Moel (iii) Moel (iv) Moel (v) Moel (vi) Moel (vii) e log(s ) 0.087*** 0.070*** 0.087*** 0.061*** 0.058*** 0.059*** 0.066*** (0.016) (0.016) (0.015) (0.015) (0.015) (0.015) (0.020) log(s i ITH ) 0.077*** 0.067*** 0.061*** 0.056*** 0.050*** 0.049*** 0.048** (0.011) (0.012) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.019) imp 0.237*** 0.213*** 0.194*** 0.195*** 0.201** (0.073) (0.069) (0.069) (0.069) (0.093) ifi 0.542*** (0.098) pa 0.629*** 0.397** 0.422*** 0.391*** (0.117) (0.160) (0.160) (0.152) pc 0.144** 0.128* 0.135* (0.068) (0.068) (0.072) el 0.040** 0.037* (0.019) (0.020) Observaions 341 331 338 329 329 329 293 Number of counries 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 Ajuse R 2 0.573 0.577 0.610 0.599 0.605 0.612 0.505 Coinegraion es Panel ADF 4.183 2.180 3.982 4.480 5.162 4.427 saisics Decision CI CI CI CI CI CI N/A a log(x) is log of X. Sanar errors are in he parenheses. b All esimaions inclue unrepore counry-specific consans. c Sanar errors are in he parenheses. *, **, an *** enoe significance a he 10, 5, an 1 percen levels, respecively. Panel ADF saisic is from Peroni (1999) which has asympoic normal isribuion. CI represens panel coinegraion while N enoes no coinegraion. e Moel (vii) is he resul from insrumenal variables meho (IV) regression. 7

Par 4: Esimaion resuls wih more comprehensive efiniion of foreign IT sock: S i (Imporweighe sum of foreign counry s IT concenraion) Table 5C. Panel TFP Esimaion Base on Comprehensive Foreign IT sock (S i ) (Depenen Variable: log(tfp)) Moel (i) Moel (ii) Moel (iii) Moel (iv) Moel (v) Moel (vi) Moel (vii) e log(s ) 0.074*** 0.062*** 0.081*** 0.060*** 0.059*** 0.059*** 0.072*** (0.018) (0.018) (0.018) (0.017) (0.017) (0.017) (0.025) log(s i ) 0.066*** 0.055*** 0.049*** 0.042*** 0.035*** 0.035*** 0.027 (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.017) imp 0.247*** 0.230*** 0.209*** 0.210*** 0.224** (0.074) (0.070) (0.070) (0.070) (0.093) ifi 0.556*** (0.101) pa 0.617*** 0.362** 0.390** 0.365** (0.121) (0.163) (0.162) (0.161) pc 0.162** 0.144** 0.159** (0.070) (0.070) (0.073) el 0.043** 0.039* (0.019) (0.021) Observaions 341 331 338 329 329 329 293 Number of counries 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 Ajuse R 2 0.559 0.563 0.597 0.583 0.590 0.598 0.494 Coinegraion es Panel ADF 4.942 3.505 4.788 2.234 6.177 4.685 saisics Decision CI CI CI CI CI CI N/A a log(x) is log of X. Sanar errors are in he parenheses. b All esimaions inclue unrepore counry-specific consans. c Sanar errors are in he parenheses. *, **, an *** enoe significance a he 10, 5, an 1 percen levels, respecively. Panel ADF saisic is from Peroni (1999) which has asympoic normal isribuion. CI represens panel coinegraion while N enoes no coinegraion. e Moel (vii) is he resul from insrumenal variables meho (IV) regression. 8

Par 5: Esimaion resuls wih foreign IT sock efiniion which is solely compose of hi-ech expor counry IT socks: S i TechH (Impor-weighe sum of IT from hi-ech expor counries) Table 6D. Panel TFP Esimaion Base on Hi-ech-Expor Counry Originaing Foreign IT sock (S i ITechH ): Depenen Variable: log(tfp) Moel (i) Moel (ii) Moel (iii) Moel (iv) Moel (v) Moel (vi) Moel (vii) e log(s ) 0.084*** 0.071*** 0.085*** 0.066*** 0.065*** 0.064*** 0.078*** (0.017) (0.017) (0.016) (0.016) (0.016) (0.016) (0.024) log(s i TechH ) 0.064*** 0.054*** 0.050*** 0.041*** 0.034*** 0.034*** 0.026 (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.019) imp 0.239*** 0.223*** 0.203*** 0.203*** 0.220** (0.074) (0.071) (0.071) (0.070) (0.096) ifi 0.572*** (0.099) pa 0.629*** 0.373** 0.401** 0.368** (0.120) (0.163) (0.162) (0.160) pc 0.161** 0.143** 0.162** (0.070) (0.070) (0.075) el 0.044** 0.039* (0.019) (0.021) Observaions 341 331 338 329 329 329 293 Number of counries 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 Ajuse R 2 0.558 0.562 0.600 0.583 0.590 0.598 0.508 Coinegraion es Panel ADF 4.656 3.254 5.130 3.462 6.444 4.557 saisics Decision CI CI CI CI CI CI N/A a log(x) is log of X. Sanar errors are in he parenheses. b All esimaions inclue unrepore counry-specific consans. c Sanar errors are in he parenheses. *, **, an *** enoe significance a he 10, 5, an 1 percen levels, respecively. Panel ADF saisic is from Peroni (1999) which has asympoic normal isribuion. CI represens panel coinegraion while N enoes no coinegraion. e Moel (vii) is he resul from insrumenal variables meho (IV) regression. 9