Future radio galaxy surveys

Similar documents
Mario Santos (on behalf of the Cosmology SWG) Stockholm, August 24, 2015

Future Radio Interferometers

Continuum Surveys with LOFAR, SKA and its Pathfinders. Chiara Ferra!

RADIO-OPTICAL-cmb SYNERGIES. Alkistis Pourtsidou ICG Portsmouth

Cosmological Galaxy Surveys: Future Directions at cm/m Wavelengths

An Introduction to ASKAP Bringing Radio Interferometers Into the Multi-pixel Era

SKA Precursors and Pathfinders. Steve Torchinsky

CSIRO astronomy and space science (CASS) Ray Norris, CSIRO Astronomy & Space Science

Apertif. Paolo Serra. Tom Oosterloo (PI) Marc Verheijen (PI) Laurens Bakker George Heald Wim van Cappellen Marianna Ivashina

HI in Galaxies at Redshifts 0.1 to 1.0: Current and Future Observations Using Optical Redshifts for HI Coadding. Philip Lah

Large Field of View Radio Astronomy; relevant for many KSP s

An Introduction to Radio Astronomy

An Introduction to Radio Astronomy

Parkes 21 cm Intensity Mapping Experiments

The international SKA project

SKA Continuum Deep Field Surveys

The Square Kilometre Array and the radio/gamma-ray connection toward the SKA era

SKA radio cosmology: Correlation with other data

MOS: A critical tool for current & future radio surveys Daniel J.B. Smith, University of Hertfordshire, UK.

Design Reference Mission for SKA1 P. Dewdney System Delta CoDR

The Square Kilometer Array. Presented by Simon Worster

Can we do this science with SKA1-mid?

The Future of Radio Astronomy. Karen O Neil

HI Galaxy Science with SKA1. Erwin de Blok (ASTRON, NL) on behalf of The HI Science Working Group

The Square Kilometre Array. Richard Schilizzi SKA Program Development Office

Apertif - the focal-plane array system for the WSRT

The Cosmic Evolution of Neutral Atomic Hydrogen Gas Philip Lah

Synergies between 21cm intensity mapping, optical, and CMB surveys. Alkistis Pourtsidou, ICG Portsmouth

The Cosmic Evolution of Neutral Atomic Hydrogen Gas. Philip Lah. Macquarie University Colloquium 27th March 2015

PoS(PRA2009)015. Exploring the HI Universe with ASKAP. Martin Meyer. The DINGO team

The Square Kilometre Array & High speed data recording

The Square Kilometre Array Radio Telescope Project : An Overview

DINGO early science with ASKAP-12

SKA1 Capabilities for HI Surveys. Robert Braun SKA Science Director 18 th March 2014

The Canadian Hydrogen Intensity. Mapping Experiment. Matt Dobbs

HI Signatures of galaxy evolution Thijs van der Hulst

Overview of the Square Kilometre Array. Richard Schilizzi COST Workshop, Rome, 30 March 2010

Radio Telescopes of the Future

The SKA Molonglo Prototype (SKAMP) progress & first results. Anne Green University of Sydney

What We Can Learn and How We Should Do It

10x Effective area JVLA, ALMA 10x Resolution w. 50% to few km + 50% to 300km Frequency range: 1 50, GHz

From LOFAR to SKA, challenges in distributed computing. Soobash Daiboo Paris Observatory -LESIA

Long wavelengths and the Square Kilometre Array (in the context of radio continuum surveys) Vernesa Smolčić (University of Zagreb, Croatia)

Square Kilometre Array Science Data Challenge 1

International Project Update

Commensal observing: HI science with MIGHTEE

Inferring source polarisation properties from SKA observations. Joern Geisbuesch

Wide Field Astronomy with ASKAP. Wide Field Astronomy with ASKAP. ASKAP Specifications ASKAP & SKA

Transient Cosmic Phenomena and their Influence on the Design of the SKA Radio Telescope

ASKAP-EMU: Overcoming the challenges of wide deep continuum surveys

Square Kilometre Array. Steve Torchinsky

HI Surveys and the xntd Antenna Configuration

Square Kilometre Array: status. Philip Diamond SKA Director-General 16 th September 2013

Square Kilometre Array Nigel Rix

ASKAP Array Configurations: Options and Recommendations. Ilana Feain, Simon Johnston & Neeraj Gupta Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO

M. Huynh R. Smits L. Harvey-Smith A. Bouchard R. Beck D. Obreschkow I. Stairs A. Popping L. Staveley-Smith J. Lazio R. Norris

Dark Energy. Cluster counts, weak lensing & Supernovae Ia all in one survey. Survey (DES)

Introduction to Interferometry

Cecilia Fariña - ING Support Astronomer

APERTIF. imaging surveys. Marc Verheijen

New calibration sources for very long baseline interferometry in the 1.4-GHz band

Radio Astronomy module

Source Detection in the Image Domain

Determining the Specification of an Aperture Array for Cosmological Surveys

SKA s impact on Galaxy Assembly. Rogier Windhorst (Arizona State University)

Science Operations with the Square Kilometre Array

ASKAP. and phased array feeds in astronomy. David McConnell CASS: ASKAP Commissioning and Early Science 16 November 2017

J. Astrophys. Astr. (0000) 00,

The Australian SKA Pathfinder. Wednesday, 5 May 2010

SCIENTIFIC CASES FOR RECEIVERS UNDER DEVELOPMENT (OR UNDER EVALUATION)

The LeMMINGs e-merlin survey of nearby galaxies

SKA1 LEVEL 0 SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS

The Square Kilometre Array Epoch of Reionisation and Cosmic Dawn Experiment

High-performance computing and the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) Chris Broekema (ASTRON) Compute platform lead SKA Science Data Processor

BINGO simulations and updates on the performance of. the instrument

Welcome and SKA Overview Michiel van Haarlem. Interim Director General SKA Organisation 15 February 2012

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 11 Oct 2018

Continuum Observing. Continuum Emission and Single Dishes

VLBI Working Group: SKA-VLBI key science areas. Zsolt Paragi et al. Joint Institute for VLBI ERIC (JIVE)

Prospects for Extragalactic HI Line Studies with Large Single Dishes

SKA - The next steps...

Submillimetre astronomy

Science at Very High Angular Resolution with SKA. Sergei Gulyaev Auckland, 14 February 2018

The micro- and nano-jy sky

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Square Kilometer Array

Reverse Ray-Tracing in Urchin

Overview: Astronomical Spectroscopy

Wallaby and SKA HI surveys. Lister Staveley-Smith

Galaxy Ecosystems Adam Leroy (OSU), Eric Murphy (NRAO/IPAC) on behalf of ngvla Working Group 2

The star-formation history of mass-selected galaxies in the VIDEO survey

Roberto Ricci, INAF-IRA. Spectral properties of a sample of 20-GHz selected radio sources

E-MERLIN and EVN/e-VLBI Capabilities, Issues & Requirements

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 16 Oct 2018

and the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

Radio Interferometry and Aperture Synthesis

21 cm Cosmology. Miguel F. Morales Boulder, October 5 th, 2010

Crurent and Future Massive Redshift Surveys

EUCLID Spectroscopy. Andrea Cimatti. & the EUCLID-NIS Team. University of Bologna Department of Astronomy

Thoughts on LWA/FASR Synergy

Transcription:

Future radio galaxy surveys Phil Bull JPL/Caltech

Quick overview Radio telescopes are now becoming sensitive enough to perform surveys of 107 109 galaxies out to high z 2 main types of survey from the same datacube: Continuum (no z) Neutral hydrogen 21cm (spectro z) SKA1: ~108 galaxies, z<5 (~few x 106 spectra, z<0.3) SKA2: >109 galaxies, z<5 (~109 spectra at z<1.5) World beating constraints on BAO/RSD from SKA2 (competitive for weak lensing) Interesting niche applications for SKA1

Quick overview Radio telescopes are now becoming sensitive enough to perform surveys of 107 109 galaxies out to high z 2 main types of survey from the same datacube: Continuum (no z) Neutral hydrogen 21cm (spectro z) SKA1: ~108 galaxies, z<5 (~few x 106 spectra, z<0.3) SKA2: >109 galaxies, z<5 (~109 spectra at z<1.5) World beating constraints on BAO/RSD from SKA2 (competitive for weak lensing) Interesting niche applications for SKA1

Quick overview Radio telescopes are now becoming sensitive enough to perform surveys of 107 109 galaxies out to high z 2 main types of survey from the same datacube: Continuum (no z) Neutral hydrogen 21cm (spectro z) SKA1: ~108 galaxies, z<5 (~few x 106 spectra, z<0.3) SKA2: >109 galaxies, z<5 (~109 spectra at z<1.5) Best possible constraints on BAO/RSD from SKA2 (+competitive for weak lensing) Less clear cut for SKA1, but interesting options (especially for synergistic science)

Novelties of radio telescopes Cost and robustness Relatively simple and inexpensive except for correlators Can simply add/move receivers to improve sensitivity Weather, day/night cycle not very important (at ~1 GHz) Interferometry Receiving elements: tradeoff between FOV and sensitivity Baseline distribution + weighting determines PSF Incomplete sampling of the Fourier plane; missing/aliased modes Spectral resolution Intrinsically high spectral resolution Choose spectral resolution on the fly, depending on target

Novelties of radio telescopes Cost and robustness Relatively simple and inexpensive except for correlators Can simply add/move receivers to improve sensitivity Weather, day/night cycle not very important (at ~1 GHz) Interferometry Receiving elements: tradeoff between FOV and sensitivity Baseline distribution + weighting determines PSF Incomplete sampling of the Fourier plane; missing/aliased modes Spectral resolution Intrinsically high spectral resolution Choose spectral resolution on the fly, depending on target

Novelties of radio telescopes Cost and robustness Relatively simple and inexpensive except for correlators Can simply add/move receivers to improve sensitivity Weather, day/night cycle not very important (at ~1 GHz) Interferometry Receiving elements: tradeoff between FOV and sensitivity Baseline distribution + weighting determines PSF Incomplete sampling of the Fourier plane; missing/aliased modes Spectral resolution Intrinsically high spectral resolution Choose spectral resolution on the fly, depending on target Neutral hydrogen 21cm line (<1420 MHz) is primary target

High Resolved galaxies HI Intensity Mapping survey HI Galaxy Redshift survey 3D Continuum survey 2D Low Redshift resolution Unresolved galaxies Low High Angular resolution

Survey telescopes Point source sensitivity Better! Tingay et al. (2013) Instantaneous FOV [deg2]

Survey telescopes Better! Point source sensitivity SKA2 Tingay et al. (2013) SKA1 Pathfinders Instantaneous FOV [deg2]

Timeline ASKAP, MeerKAT: already built. Planned surveys: MIGHTEE: MeerKAT deep continuum survey LADUMA: MeerKAT deep HI survey EMU: ASKAP continuum, 75% of sky, 10 µjy/beam, z<1 WALLABY: ASKAP HI, 75% of sky, 0.5m galaxies, z<0.26 SKA1: 2017: Tender construction 2018 2021: Construction 2020: Early science begins ~2025: Large surveys should be available SKA2: 2017 2020: Detailed design 2019 2021: Seek funding 2022 2027: Construction ~2030: Surveys available (schedule from B. Fanaroff)

Timeline ASKAP, MeerKAT: already built. Planned surveys: MIGHTEE: MeerKAT deep continuum survey LADUMA: MeerKAT deep HI survey EMU: ASKAP continuum, 75% of sky, 10 µjy/beam, z<1 WALLABY: ASKAP HI, 75% of sky, 0.5m galaxies, z<0.26 SKA1: 2017: Tender construction 2018 2021: Construction 2020: Early science begins ~2025: Large surveys should be available SKA2: 2017 2020: Detailed design 2019 2021: Seek funding 2022 2027: Construction ~2030: Surveys available (schedule from B. Fanaroff)

Timeline ASKAP, MeerKAT: already built. Planned surveys: MIGHTEE: MeerKAT deep continuum survey LADUMA: MeerKAT deep HI survey EMU: ASKAP continuum, 75% of sky, 10 µjy/beam, z<1 WALLABY: ASKAP HI, 75% of sky, 0.5m galaxies, z<0.26 SKA1: 2017: Tender construction 2018 2021: Construction 2020: Early science begins ~2025: Large surveys should be available SKA2: 2017 2020: Detailed design 2019 2021: Seek funding 2022 2027: Construction ~2030: Surveys available (schedule from B. Fanaroff)

SKA1 MID Conventional dish array with single pixel feeds in S. Africa ~200 x 15m dishes with balanced core + spiral arm layout 5 bands, covering 350 MHz 14 GHz Band 1: 350 1050 MHz Band 2: 950 1760 MHz Includes MeerKAT Low Tinst ~ 24 K (SKA1 LOW at <350 MHz) SKA

SKA1 MID Conventional dish array with single pixel feeds in S. Africa ~200 x 15m dishes with balanced core + spiral arm layout 5 bands, covering 350 MHz 14 GHz Band 1: 350 1050 MHz Band 2: 950 1760 MHz Includes MeerKAT Low Tinst ~ 24 K (SKA1 LOW at <350 MHz) SKA2 10 20 times more sensitive Not yet defined! SKA

Survey specifications SKA1 hardware specs more or less fixed, but survey specs likely to change (through KSP process) Simultaneous HI and continuum observations Tiered strategy likely: @ 1 2 GHz All sky: 30,000 deg2 (2.0 PSF, 2 µjy/beam) Wide: 5,000 deg2 (0.5 PSF, 0.3 µjy/beam) Deep: 30 deg2 (0.5 PSF, 0.04 µjy/beam) Total ~10k hour surveys (2 3 yrs); max. 5k likely in 1 tier Which band gets the big surveys? Likely Band 2 (0.95 1.7 GHz), good for continuum Restricts HI survey to z < 0.49 (OK given MID sensitivity) Prandoni, Seymour & SKA Continuum SWG

Survey specifications SKA1 hardware specs more or less fixed, but survey specs likely to change (through KSP process) Simultaneous HI and continuum observations Tiered strategy likely: @ 1 2 GHz All sky: 30,000 deg2 (2.0 PSF, 2 µjy/beam) Wide: 5,000 deg2 (0.5 PSF, 0.3 µjy/beam) Deep: 30 deg2 (0.5 PSF, 0.04 µjy/beam) Total ~10k hour surveys (2 3 yrs); max. 5k likely in 1 tier Which band gets the big surveys? Likely Band 2 (0.95 1.7 GHz), good for continuum Restricts HI survey to z < 0.49 (OK given MID sensitivity) Prandoni, Seymour & SKA Continuum SWG

Continuum number density Detect ~108 / 109 galaxies with SKA1/2 SKA1: Assume <0.5 µjy (at 1 GHz) over 5,000 deg2 SKA2: Assume <0.1 µjy over 30,000 deg2 Based on Wilman et al. (2008) sims (code by D. Alonso)

HI number density Yahya et al. 2015 SKA2 ~30k deg2 SKA1-MID ~5,000 deg2

BAO+RSD with HI SKA1: HI luminosity function too steep; restricted to low z Interesting cosmology with resolved 21cm line? e.g. peculiar velocities. PB (2016), based on S cubed sims

BAO+RSD with HI SKA1: HI luminosity function too steep; restricted to low z Interesting cosmology with resolved 21cm line? e.g. peculiar velocities. PB (2016), based on S cubed sims SKA2: Sample variance limited BAO over 0 < z < 1.5, ¾ sky Maximising survey area is important for linear modes Highly oversampled at low z; great for RSDs/multi tracer

Continuum weak lensing Radio weak lensing has interesting features highly complementary to optical (e.g. DES, LSST, Euclid) Weighted PSF with <1 FWHM No redshift info, but good overlap with CMB lensing kernel

Continuum weak lensing Radio weak lensing has interesting features highly complementary to optical (e.g. DES, LSST, Euclid) Weighted PSF with <1 FWHM No redshift info, but good overlap with CMB lensing kernel Raw performance: competitive with DES (but in ~2024) Synergies are more exciting: identify blends, IA Harrison et al. (2016)

What are HI galaxies? Most galaxies have neutral hydrogen content Close to unbiased (b=1) for low flux thresholds Significant uncertainty in HI evolution with z and halo mass Padmanabhan & Refregier (2016) Yahya, PB, Santos et al. (2015)

What are continuum galaxies? Mostly star forming galaxies (synchrotron emission) Significant population of active galaxies (RQQs) at low z Small fraction of AGN with jets, detectable out to high z >1 µjy Based on Wilman et al. (2008) sims (code by D. Alonso)

Technology: Aperture Arrays SKA2 may move to an aperture array setup: Dense AA stations made of Vivaldi dual pol. antennae Very large FOV, electronically steered Large effective area, passive cooling (high Tsys) SKA and EMBRACE

Technology: Phased Array Feeds Multi pixel detectors installed at focus Multiple beams on sky increase FOV of single dish Steerable dishes control sidelobes, RFI, groundspill Currently being demonstrated on ASKAP ATNF/ASKAP A. Hotan/CSIRO

Challenges Lots of fun things to figure out/improve over the next 5 years: Signal modelling n(z) and b(z) still quite uncertain Beam deconvolution (radio beams are more complex, but you have more control over them) Continuum redshift estimation Better source detection algorithms RFI detection/rejection Computing! Could do much more with faster computers... On the fly calibration (data rate too large to store raw) (Cultural: radio astronomers only just getting used to surveys. Slight phobia of cosmology.)

Challenges Lots of fun things to figure out/improve over the next 5 years: Signal modelling n(z) and b(z) still quite uncertain Beam deconvolution (radio beams are more complex, but you have more control over them) Continuum redshift estimation Better source detection algorithms RFI detection/rejection Computing! Could do much more with faster computers... On the fly calibration (data rate too large to store raw) (Cultural: radio astronomers only just getting used to surveys. Slight phobia of cosmology.)

Challenges Lots of fun things to figure out/improve over the next 5 years: Signal modelling n(z) and b(z) still quite uncertain Beam deconvolution (radio beams are more complex, but you have more control over them) Continuum redshift estimation Better source detection algorithms RFI detection/rejection Computing! Could do much more with faster computers... On the fly calibration (data rate too large to store raw) Cultural: historical radio methods not suitable for big survey programmes (e.g. CLEAN deconvolution)

Summary The first truly large radio galaxy surveys are imminent ~100m galaxies at z < 5 possible with SKA1 continuum (but only ~5m spectra, at z < 0.3) ~1 billion spectra possible with SKA2 HI survey SKA1 + pathfinders are currently the only game in town for big, cosmological radio galaxy surveys SKA2 design begins next year get ideas out there ASAP!