Notes on the HIE-ISOLDE HEBT

Similar documents
THE DESIGN AND COMMISSIONING OF THE ACCELERATOR SYSTEM OF THE RARE ISOTOPE REACCELERATOR ReA3 AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY*

Muon Front-End without Cooling

CEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi

The Accelerator System for ReA3 the New Re-accelerated RIBs Facility at MSU

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

TEST MEASUREMENTS WITH THE REX-ISOLDE LINAC STRUCTURES*

HIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

$)ODW%HDP(OHFWURQ6RXUFHIRU/LQHDU&ROOLGHUV

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

Alignment requirement for the SRF cavities of the LCLS-II injector LCLSII-TN /16/2014

Investigation of the Effect of Space Charge in the compact-energy Recovery Linac

Development and application of the RFQs for FAIR and GSI Projects

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

LCLS Injector Straight Ahead Spectrometer C.Limborg-Deprey Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 8 th June 2005

ERL FOR LOW ENERGY ELECTRON COOLING AT RHIC (LEREC)*

Start-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source*

LHeC Recirculator with Energy Recovery Beam Optics Choices

IFMIF High energy beam line design and beam expansion using non-linear multipole lenses and "step-like" magnet

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Linac JUAS lecture summary

Developments of the RCNP cyclotron cascade

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

The FAIR Accelerator Facility

SRF GUN CHARACTERIZATION - PHASE SPACE AND DARK CURRENT MEASUREMENTS AT ELBE*

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

BEAM DYNAMICS OF SPL: ISSUES AND SOLUTIONS

Bunch Compressor for Intense Proton Beams

Multiparameter optimization of an ERL. injector

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

FACET-II Design Update

COMBINER RING LATTICE

Status of the EBIT in the ReA3 reaccelerator at NSCL

UPGRADE OF THE HIT INJECTOR LINAC-FRONTEND

Optics considerations for

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

Pros and Cons of the Acceleration Scheme (NF-IDS)

RF System Calibration Using Beam Orbits at LEP

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CTF3 DRIVE BEAM INJECTOR OPTIMISATION

LIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

Practical Lattice Design

ACCELERATION, DECELERATION AND BUNCHING OF STORED AND COOLED ION BEAMS AT THE TSR, HEIDELBERG

UPGRADE OF THE HIT INJECTOR LINAC-FRONTEND

The SARAF 40 MeV Proton/Deuteron Accelerator

Compact Linac for Deuterons (Based on IH Structures with PMQ Focusing)

slhc-project-report-0029

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

STATUS OF THE NOVOSIBIRSK ENERGY RECOVERY LINAC

Present ISOLDE facility Aims of HIE-ISOLDE upgrade First steps towards HIE-ISOLDE

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

Introduction to particle accelerators

Proposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator

Overview of Acceleration

Proton LINAC for the Frankfurt Neutron Source FRANZ

Design of a Low-Energy Chopper System for FRANZ

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Extraction by stripping in the INFN-LNS Superconducting Cyclotron:

Diagnostic Systems for Characterizing Electron Sources at the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 20 Jun 2013

WG2 on ERL light sources CHESS & LEPP

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Buncher-System for FRANZ

Femto second X ray Pulse Generation by Electron Beam Slicing. F. Willeke, L.H. Yu, NSLSII, BNL, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Preliminary design of proton and ion linacs for SPPC Injector

Injector Experimental Progress

Beam Dynamics for CSNS Linac. Jun Peng September. 18, 2012

FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities

Advanced Design of the FAIR Storage Ring Complex

Institute of Modern Physics, China Academy of Science, Lanzhou , China

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Abstract. 1. Introduction

A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Development of the UNILAC towards a Megawatt Beam Injector

EFFECT OF THE FIRST AXIAL FIELD SPECTROMETER IN THE CERN INTERSECTING STORAGE RINGS (ISR) ON THE CIRCULATING BEAMS

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Low slice emittance preservation during bunch compression

A Low Energy Beam Transport Design with high SCC for TAC Proton Accelerator

LIGHT. ...from laser ion acceleration to future applications. - project overview and lates experimental results -

Optimization of the SIS100 Lattice and a Dedicated Collimation System for Ionisation Losses

Emittance preservation in TESLA

TeV Scale Muon RLA Complex Large Emittance MC Scenario

SwissFEL INJECTOR DESIGN: AN AUTOMATIC PROCEDURE

Hadron cancer therapy complex using nonscaling fixed field alternating gradient accelerator and gantry design

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring

Evaluating the Emittance Increase Due to the RF Coupler Fields

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 9, Physics 663, lecture 2 1

Velocity Bunching Studies at FLASH. Bolko Beutner, DESY XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

Status of the ESR And Future Options

Introduction. Thermoionic gun vs RF photo gun Magnetic compression vs Velocity bunching. Probe beam design options

KONUS BEAM DYNAMICS DESIGNS USING H-MODE CAVITIES

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Linac4 chopper line commissioning strategy

Transverse Collection of Pions

Transcription:

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH HIE-ISOLDE-PROJECT-Note-13 Notes on the HIE-ISOLDE HEBT M.A. Fraser Abstract The HEBT will need to transfer the beam from the HIE-ISOLDE linac to up to four experimental stations over a wide range of energies from.45 MeV/u to 1 MeV/u, which equates to a maximum beam rigidity of 2 Tm for A/q = 4.5. As the linac will be installed in stages, so too will the HEBT, with the first two experimental stations being installed before a larger U-bend that will take the beam to a third experimental station and a spectrometer. The beam parameters at output from the linac are presented along with a preliminary scheme for the HEBT, which is consistent with the experiments footprints. The first beam optics calculations were carried out using TRACE3D. Supporting documentation can be found on the CERN EDMS under the HEBT Lines Optics & Layout Working Group in the HIE- ISOLDE Structure. Geneva, Switzerland October 211 This is an internal CERN publication and does not necessarily reflect the views of the CERN management.

1 Beam Parameters The energy of the beams at output from the linac is a function of A/q and will range from.45 to 17 MeV/u. There also exists the possiblity to transport the RF beam at.3 MeV/u. The heaviest beams will be accelerated up to a maximum energy of 1 MeV/u and have a rigidity of 2 Tm. The two main stages of the upgrade are shown in Figure 1. In addition, if a chopper line is installed the linac will be extended in Stage 2b by the length of one high energy cryomodule, i.e. 2.62 m, which can be seen in Figure 5. The beam parameters are given in Tables 2, 3 and 4 at the exit to the linac, i.e. at output from the final cryomodule, in each stage. The particle phase space distributions are shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4 from which the above mentioned beam parameters were extracted. The simulation tracked the realistic particle distribution from the RF exit through the realistic field maps of the linac s elements. The beam parameters vary with energy, although in all cases the beam exits the solenoid focusing channel of the linac at a waist and with reasonable symmetry in the vertical and horizontal phase space planes. Figure 1: REX linac with the HIE-ISOLDE upgrade in Stages 1 and 2b. The transverse beam parameters damp adiabatically with increasing energy and the longitudinal beam emittance reduces significantly on completion of the upgrade and installation of the low energy superconducting section. The requested beam parameters are summarised in Table 1. The exact specification is given in the minutes of the 3rd HIE-ISOLDE Physics Co-ordination Meeting. 2

Beam Parameter Table 1: Requested beam characteristics at HIE-ISOLDE Energy Beam spot diameter Beam divergence Micro-bunch structure a Description or Value continuous from <.7 to 1 MeV/u < 1 3 mm FWHM < 1 3 mrad FWHM no requirement of micro-bunching to bunched at < 1 ns with ns bunch spacing Energy spread <.1 % Absolute energy resolution no specific details given a The macro-bunch structure of the beam is determined by the charge breeder and the rf duty cycle of the REX front-end. 3

Table 2: Summary of the simulated horizontal HIE beam parameters Stage Simulation Energy αx βx ɛ geom x rms ɛ geom x 95% ɛ norm x rms ɛ norm x 95% Code (MeV/u) (mm/mrad) (π mm mrad) (π mm mrad) (π mm mrad) (π mm mrad) Stage 1 TRACK 5.9.27 1..81 3.95.9.45 Stage 2b TRACK 1.2.3 1.55.6 3.14.9.46 Stage 2b TRACK.45 -.32.51 3.4 2.2.11.62 Table 3: Summary of the simulated vertical HIE beam parameters Stage Simulation Energy αy βy ɛ geom y rms ɛ geom y 95% ɛ norm y rms ɛ norm y 95% Code (MeV/u) (mm/mrad) (π mm mrad) (π mm mrad) (π mm mrad) (π mm mrad) Stage 1 TRACK 5.9 -.4 1.3.8 3.68.9.42 Stage 2b TRACK 1.2. 1.21.6 3.16.9.47 Stage 2b TRACK.45 -.37.8 3.56 19.6.11.61 Table 4: Summary of the simulated longitudinal HIE beam parameters Stage Simulation Energy αz βz ɛz rms ɛz 95% ɛz rms ɛz 95% Code (MeV/u) (ns/kev/u) ( /%) * (π ns kev/u) (π ns kev/u) (π %) * (π %) * Stage 1 TRACK 5.9 -.49.4 8.7.58 3.8.36 2.34 Stage 2b TRACK 1.2.88.3 12..3 2.12.11.76 Stage 2b TRACK.45 11.9 14.9 24.35 2.6 2.84 21.1 * At 11.28 MHz. 4

6 4 ε g =.81 π mm mrad x (rms) ε g = 3.95 π mm mrad x (95 %) 2 2 6 4 ε g =.8 π mm mrad y (rms) ε g = 3.68 π mm mrad y (95 %) 2 2 2 2 x (mrad) 2 1 y (mrad) 2 1 4 α x =.27 β x = 1. mm/mrad 6 5 5 x (mm) 4 α y =.4 β y = 1.3 mm/mrad 6 5 5 y (mm) (a) horizontal phase space (b) vertical phase space 12 8 6 ε z (rms) =.58 π ns kev/u ε z (95 %) = 3.8 π ns kev/u 2 2 W/A (kev/u) 4 2 2 1 4 6 α z =.49 β z =.4 ns/kev/u 8.4.2.2.4 φ (ns) (c) longitudinal phase space Figure 2: Beam phase space distribution at exit to the second high energy cryomodule in Stage 1 at 5.9 MeV/u, simulated with TRACK. 5

6 4 ε g =.6 π mm mrad x (rms) ε g = 3.14 π mm mrad x (95 %) 2 2 6 4 ε g =.6 π mm mrad y (rms) ε g = 3.16 π mm mrad y (95 %) 2 2 2 2 x (mrad) 2 1 y (mrad) 2 1 4 α x =.3 β x = 1.55 mm/mrad 6 5 5 x (mm) 4 α y =. β y = 1.21 mm/mrad 6 5 5 y (mm) (a) horizontal phase space (b) vertical phase space 8 6 4 ε z (rms) =.3 π ns kev/u ε z (95 %) = 2.1 π ns kev/u 2 2 W/A (kev/u) 2 2 1 4 6 8 α z =.88 β z =.3 ns/kev/u.1.5.5.1.15 φ (ns) (c) longitudinal phase space Figure 3: Beam phase space distribution at exit to the final high energy cryomodule in Stage 2b at 1.2 MeV/u, simulated with TRACK. 6

15 1 ε g = 3.4 π mm mrad x (rms) ε g = 2.2 π mm mrad x (95 %) 2 2 15 1 ε g = 3.6 π mm mrad y (rms) ε g = 19.6 π mm mrad y (95 %) 2 2 5 5 x (mrad) 5 1 y (mrad) 5 1 1 α x =.32 β x =.51 mm/mrad 15 1 5 5 1 x (mm) 1 α y =.37 β y =.8 mm/mrad 15 1 5 5 1 y (mm) (a) horizontal phase space (b) vertical phase space 14 12 1 ε z (rms) =.35 π ns kev/u ε z (95 %) = 2.6 π ns kev/u 2 2 W/A (kev/u) 8 6 4 2 1 2 α z = 11.9 β z = 14.9 ns/kev/u 4 2 15 1 5 5 φ (ns) (c) longitudinal phase space Figure 4: Beam phase space distribution at exit to the final high energy cryomodule in Stage 2b, with the low energy section phased to decelerate down to.45 MeV/u, simulated with TRACK. 7

2 Layout The HEBT design aimed to make the most of the limited space. The position of the experimental areas should stay fixed and just the transfer line manipulated as more cryomodules are added. Note that before Stage 2b, a third and fourth high energy cryomodule will be installed. The idea was to have a periodic FODO channel to transport the beam to each double bend achromat, of which periods could be removed in a modular fashion as cryomodules are added. However, it was not possible to find a FODO channel with the period the same length as the cryomodules because of the size of the dipole magnets required. Instead, a quasi-fodo channel was chosen (almost a doublet channel) where there are two drifts of different length per period. The total length of the period is 3.2 m. Inside of the long drift the dipoles magnets can fit and in the short drift a rebuncher or diagnostics/steerers could be placed. The difference in the lengths of the cryomodule and the transfer line period can be compensated by the matching section. A transverse phase advance of π/2 per period was chosen to match the phase advance in the linac and help any orbit correction routine that is placed periodically. Four quadrupoles were rather arbitrarily chosen to match into the FODO channel from the linac, although in most cases all four are not needed. The transfer line is sketched in AutoCAD for the two main stages in Figure 5, see the (a) HEBT for Stage 1. (b) HEBT for Stage 2b. Figure 5: HEBT layout in the extension of the ISOLDE experimental hall. 8

accompanying files or discuss with Didier Voulot. The design aimed to keep elements standardised. There are 8 rectangular dipole magnets each bending the beam through 45 and 2 bending the beam through 22.5, capable of directing beams with 2 Tm of rigidity. The number of quadrupoles vary and the specifics of the transverse matching to each experiment needs further iteration. Also shown in red is the possibility of translating the beam vertically by one floor to the proposed TSR storage ring. 3 Beam Optics Calculations The beam optics calculations were done using TRACE3D, see the figures below and the accompanying files. All the parameters of interest are held in these files. No studies of the stability of the designs or the orbit correction routine have been completed. A phase advance of π/2 results in quadrupole gradients of 11.1 Tm 1 at 1 MeV/u with a quadrupoles of an effective length of 2 mm. The gradients do not exceed this value at any point in the double bend achromats except for in the matching section. The beam optics calculations show that all beams can be kept inside a radial aperture of 1 mm, and an aperture diameter of 4 mm in the quadrupoles is specified. The energy and time structure of the beam is very important for the experiments. A rebuncher can be used in most cases to achieve the desired parameters shown in Table 1. The rebuncher is shown and needs significant voltages ( 1 MV) suggesting a superconducting cavity will be needed. 3.1 Stage 1 - Experiment Station 1 at 5.9 MeV/u BEAM AT NEL1= 1 H A=.27 B= 1. V A= 4.E 2 B= 1.3 H A=.27 B= 1. V A= 4.E 2 B= 1.3 5. mm X 5. mrad I=.mA W= 265. 265. MeV FRE= 11.28MHz WL=296.4mm EMITI= 3.9 3.68 6235. EMITO= 3.9 3.68 6235. N1= 1 N2= 49 x. 1. y. 1. 1 42 3. 1 44 2. 1 46 2. BEAM AT NEL2= 49 H A= 2.7381E 2 B= 1.34 V A= 3.33314E 2 B= 1.179 H A=.14953 B=.84837 V A=.19224 B= 1.1255 5. mm X 5. mrad Z A=.49 Z A=.49 B= 3.3E 3 B= 3.3E 3 CODE: Trace 3 D v7ly FILE: miniball_stage1.t3d DATE: 1/3/211 TIME: 17:9:4 Z A= 14.336 B=.54956 Z A= 7.2892E 3 B= 4.96592E 2 6. Deg X 3. kev 1. mm (Horiz) 9. Deg (Long.) 6. Deg X 3. kev NP2= 49 1 2345678 9 1111213 G 14 1516171819 E 2 21 2223242526 27 E 28 29 3 31 E 32 33 34 3536 E 37 38 39441424344454647 48 49 1. mm (Vert) 3. (Dispersion) Length= 19796.59mm Figure 6: HEBT to Experimental Station 1 at 5.9 MeV/u with and without rebuncher (6ɛ rms envelopes). 9

3.2 Stage 1 - Experiment Station 2 at 5.9 MeV/u BEAM AT NEL1= 1 H A=.27 B= 1. V A= 4.E 2 B= 1.3 H A=.27 B= 1. V A= 4.E 2 B= 1.3 5. mm X 5. mrad I=.mA W= 265. 265. MeV FRE= 11.28MHz WL=296.4mm EMITI= 3.9 3.68 6235. EMITO= 3.9 3.68 6235. N1= 1 N2= 52 x. 1. y. 1. 1 51 4.53965 1 49 2.31166 1 47 12.6484 BEAM AT NEL2= 52 H A= 7.14649E 2 B=.8286 V A= 2.25837E 2 B=.86124 H A=.21395 B= 1.867 V A= 6.29574E 2 B=.64179 5. mm X 5. mrad Z A=.49 Z A=.49 B= 3.3E 3 B= 3.3E 3 CODE: Trace 3 D v7ly FILE: helios_stage1.t3d DATE: 1/3/211 TIME: 18:5:11 Z A= 14.511 B=.5634 Z A= 3.6422E 2 B= 1.43865E 2 6. Deg X 3. kev 1. mm (Horiz) 9. Deg (Long.) 6. Deg X 3. kev NP2= 52 1 2345678 9 1111213 G 14 1516171819 2 21222324 E 25 262728293 31 E E E 32 3343536 3738394 41 42 4344454647484951 52 1. mm (Vert) 3. (Dispersion) Length= 197.8mm Figure 7: HEBT to Experimental Station 2 at 5.9 MeV/u with and without rebuncher (6ɛ rms envelopes). 3.3 Stage 2b - Experiment Station 1 at 1.2 MeV/u BEAM AT NEL1= 1 H A=.3 B= 1.5 V A=. B= 1.2 H A=.3 B= 1.5 V A=. B= 1.2 5. mm X 5. mrad Z A=.88 Z A=.88 B= 2.6E 3 B= 2.6E 3 I=.mA W= 4. 4. MeV FRE= 11.28MHz WL=296.4mm EMITI= 3.14 3.16 348. EMITO= 3.14 3.16 348. N1= 1 N2= 38 x.. y.. 1 28 2. 1 31 3. 1 33 1. 1 35 1. CODE: Trace 3 D v7ly FILE: miniball_stage2b.t3d DATE: 1/4/211 TIME: 15:14:58 BEAM AT NEL2= 38 H A=.2182 B= 1.18 V A=.14321 B=.9823 H A=.21643 B=.95943 V A=.1496 B=.95438 5. mm X 5. mrad Z A= 8.1953 Z A=.86321 B= 9.98784E 2 B= 1.57154E 2 3. Deg X 3. kev 1. mm (Horiz) 3. Deg (Long.) 3. Deg X 3. kev NP2= 38 1 2 345 67 8 G E 9 11112 13 141516 E 17 18 19 2 21 22 23 E 24 25 E 26 272829331 3233343536 37 38 1. mm (Vert) 3. (Dispersion) Length= 1236.59mm Figure 8: HEBT to Experimental Station 1 at 1 MeV/u with and without rebuncher (6ɛ rms envelopes). 1

3.4 Stage 2b - Experiment Station 2 at 1.2 MeV/u BEAM AT NEL1= 1 H A=.3 B= 1.5 V A=. B= 1.2 H A=.3 B= 1.5 V A=. B= 1.2 5. mm X 5. mrad Z A=.88 Z A=.88 B= 2.6E 3 B= 2.6E 3 I=.mA W= 4. 4. MeV FRE= 11.28MHz WL=296.4mm EMITI= 3.14 3.16 348. EMITO= 3.14 3.16 348.3 N1= 1 N2= 4 x.. y.. 1 32 11.3319 1 35 15.38228 1 37.65217 1 39 7.996 CODE: Trace 3 D v7ly FILE: helios_stage2b_reb.t3d DATE: 1/4/211 TIME: 14:16:57 BEAM AT NEL2= 4 H A= 4.71543E 3 B=.13 V A= 1.75759E 3 B=. H A= 1.945E 2 B=.4752 V A= 2.35235E 2 B=.47946 5. mm X 5. mrad Z A= 2.9474E 2 B= 2.46E 2 Z A= 8.631 B= 9.67281E 2 3. Deg X 3. kev 1. mm (Horiz) 3. Deg (Long.) 3. Deg X 3. kev NP2= 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 G 1415 E 16 17 1819 E 2 2122 2324 25 26 E 2728 E 29 33132 33 34 35 3637 38 39 4 1. mm (Vert) 1. (Dispersion) Length= 11545.8mm Figure 9: HEBT to Experimental Station 2 at 1 MeV/u (ɛ rms and 6ɛ rms envelopes). 3.5 Stage 2b - Experiment Station 1 at.45 MeV/u BEAM AT NEL1= 1 H A=.32 B=.5 V A=.37 B=.8 H A=.32 B=.5 V A=.37 B=.8 1. mm X 1. mrad Z A= 11.9 B= 12. Z A= 11.9 B= 12. I=.mA W= 2.2 2.2 MeV FRE= 11.28MHz WL=296.4mm EMITI= 3.4 3.56 575. EMITO= 3.4 3.56 575. N1= 1 N2= 37 x.. y.. 1 28 1.89318 1 31 3.573 1 33 1.49272 1 35.217 CODE: Trace 3 D v7ly FILE: miniball_stage2b_decel.t3d DATE: 1/4/211 TIME: 15:43:35 BEAM AT NEL2= 37 H A=.2278 B=.94499 V A=.1772 B=.9419 H A=.2278 B=.94499 V A=.1772 B=.9419 1. mm X 1. mrad Z A= 25.244 B= 54.152 Z A= 25.244 B= 54.152 54. Deg X. kev 2. mm (Horiz) 54. Deg (Long.) 54. Deg X. kev NP2= 37 1 2 345 67 8 9 1 E 11 12 13 1415 E 16 17 18 19 2 21 22 E 23 24 E 25 262728293 3132333435 36 37 2. mm (Vert) 3. (Dispersion) Length= 1236.59mm Figure 1: HEBT to Experimental Station 1 at.45 MeV/u (ɛ rms and 6ɛ rms envelopes). 11

3.6 Stage 2b - Experiment Station 3 at 1 MeV/u BEAM AT NEL1= 1 H A=.3 B= 1.5 V A=. B= 1.2 1. mm X 1. mrad Z A=.88 B= 2.6E 3 I=.mA W= 4. 4. MeV FRE= 11.28MHz WL=296.4mm EMITI= 3.14 3.16 348. EMITO= 3.14 3.16 348. N1= 1 N2= 75 x 2.5948 2.8283 y 2.5948 2.8283 1 2 6.2378 1 4 3.22 1 6.6513 1 8 19.84592 CODE: Trace 3 D v7ly FILE: U.t3d DATE: 1/25/211 TIME: 14:7:34 BEAM AT NEL2= 75 H A= 3.1431 B= 2.784 V A= 1.6223 B= 2.774 1. mm X 1. mrad Z A= 2.12 B=.5883 9. Deg X 3. kev 2. mm (Horiz) 9. Deg (Long.) 9. Deg X 3. kev NP2= 8 G 123 456 7891 112 G 13 1415 16 1718 G 19 2 21 22324 25 26 27 E E E E 28293 31 32 33 343536373839441 42 43 445464748 49 51 E E E E 525354 55 56 57 585966162636465 66 67 68 6977172 73 7475 76 77 78 79 8 2. mm (Vert) 3. (Dispersion) Length= 3138.19mm Figure 11: HEBT to Experimental Station 3 at 1 MeV/u (ɛ rms and 6ɛ rms envelopes). This solution could be better matched. 3.7 Stage 2b - TSR at 1 MeV/u BEAM AT NEL1= 1 H A= 2.5948 B= 2.8283 V A= 2.5948 B= 2.8283 1. mm X 1. mrad Z A=. B= 2.E 3 I=.mA W= 4. 4. MeV FRE= 11.28MHz WL=296.4mm EMITI= 2. 2. 14. EMITO= 2. 2. 14. N1= 1 N2= 81 x 7. 28.62 y. 6.12 1 3.2332 1 52 19.32628 1 54 19.22449 1 62 24.1379 CODE: Trace 3 D v7ly FILE: TSR.t3d DATE: 1/25/211 TIME: 14:25:1 BEAM AT NEL2= 81 H A= 2.6665 B= 2.8296 V A= 2.6484 B= 2.924 1. mm X 1. mrad Z A= 15.572 B=.487 3. Deg X 3. kev 2. mm (Horiz) 3. Deg (Long.) 3. Deg X 3. kev NP2= 82 123 45 67 891 11 12 13141516 E E E E 17 18192 21 22 23 242526 27 28 29 3 31 32333435363738 39 4 41 4243445 46 474849 E B(v) E E B(v) E 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59661 62 63 6465667 68 69 7 71 72 73 74 7576778 79 881 82 2. mm (Vert) 3. (Dispersion) Length= 3688.19mm Figure 12: HEBT to TSR at 1 MeV/u. Further work is needed to match into the ring itself. 12