AIZAT BIN MOHD TAlE

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COCONUT COik BLANKET IN CONTROLLING SLOPE EROSION AIZAT BIN MOHD TAIB @ TAlE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Civil Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Resources Universiti Malaysia Pahang DECEMBER 2010

A ABSTRACT A research to determine the effectiveness of coconut coir blanket in controlling slope erosion was conducted. There were two major division of testing made. One was the material analysis on the soil sample taken and the coconut coir blanket used and another was the simulation of rainfall pouring on sloped surface soil to analyze the erosion rate. Apparently, the division of material testing involved Soil Mechanics Engineering and Light Structure Engineering. Soil Mechanics Engineering assisted this research in soil analyzing in terms of the Soil Classification, Atterberg Limit, Specific Gravity, Shear Strength, Standard Proctor and Direct Shear testing. On the other hand, Light Structure Engineering focused on Tensile Strength of the coconut coir blanket. Generally, the major testing was the simulation of rainfall on the sloped surface soil. The soil sample which was taken from construction site in Bukit Gambang,. Pahang was distributed into four cases. The parameters manipulated were the degree of slope, type of vegetation and the condition of the slope surface. The selected degree of slope were 0, 100, 20, 300, 400 and 500. The vegetations planted were based on the norm slopes grasses used which were the Signal Grass and Japanese Millet. The conditions of the slope surface were divided into two. They were bare controlled case and protected slope case using coconut coir blanket. The main parameter which was the application of coconut coir blanket as the protection to the slope was proven effective. By comparing the bare controlled slope and the protected slope, the result showed that protected slope using the coconut coir blanket decreases the erosion rate by the Total Suspended Solids (TSS) test conducted. The bare controlled slope collected 0.014345 g/l amount of TSS while protected slope using coconut coir blanket collected only 0.001368 g/l. The difference of 0.0 12977 g/l TSS amount proved that coconut coir blanket was effective in controlling slope erosion assisted by the vegetation of Signal Grass which has longer leaves and gripping fibre roots in increasing the mode of slope strength.

vii ABSTRAK Satu kajian untuk menentukan keberkesanan karpet sabut kelapa untuk mengawal hakisan cerun telah dijalankan. Terdapat dua bahagian bagi ujikaji yang dijalankan iaitu analisa ke atas sampel tanah diambil termasuklah sabut kelapa yang digunakan dan simulasi proses hujan ke atas cerun tanah untuk menganalisa hakisan cerun. Bahagian ujikaji untuk bahan yang digunakan merangkumi Kejuruteraan Mekanik Tanah dan Kejuruteraan Struktur Ringan. Kejuruteraan Mekanik Tanah membantu ujikaji mi dengan usaha menganalisa Pengelasan Tanah, Had Atterberg, Graviti Tentu, Kekuatan Ricih, Proktor Piawai and ujikaji Ricih Terus. Sebaliknya, Kejuruteraan Structur Ringan menumpukan kepada ujikaji Kekuatan Tegangan bagi bahan karpet sabut kelapa yang digunakan. Secara amnya, ujikaji utama adalah simulasi hujan ke atas cerun tanah. Sampel tanah yang diambil dari kawasan pembinaan di Bukit Gambang, Pahang dibahagikan kepada empat kes. Pembolehubah yang dimanipulasikan adalah darjah kecerunan, jenis tumbuhan dan keadaan cerun itu. Darjah kecerunan yang dipilih adalah 0, 100, 20, 30, 400 dan 50. Tumbuhan yang ditanam merujuk kepada rumput yang biasa ditanam di kawasan cerun iaitu Signal Grass dan Japanese Millet. Keadaan cerun telah dibahagikan kepada dua iaitu kes tanah kosong yang dikawal dan kes cerun tanah Yang dilindungi. Pembolehubah utama adalah aplikasi oleh karpet sabut kelapa sebagai pelindung cerun dibuktikan berkesan. Dengan membandingkan cerun kosong Yang dikawal dengan cerun yang dilindungi, keputusan ujikaji menunjukkan cerun Yang dilindungi mengurangkan hakisan tanalmya melalui ujikaji Sisa Pepejal Terampai yang telah dijalankan. Cerun yang kosong mengumpul 0.014345 g/l sisa pepejal terampai sementana cerun yang dilindungi menggunakan karpet sabut kelapa mengumpul hanya 0.001368 gil. Perbezaannya adalah 0.012977 g/l yang membuictikan karpet sabut kelapa lebih berkesan dalam mengawal hakisan cerun yang ditanam dengan rumput Signal Grass dimana daunnya yang lebih panjang dan akar serabutnya yang kuat bagi meningkatkan mod kekuatan cerun.

vu' TABLE OF CONTENT CHAPTER ITEM PAGE TITLE DECLARATION DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ABSTRACT ABSTRAK TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF APPENDICES iv v vi vii viii xiv xviii xix xxi INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of Research 1 1.2 Problem Statement 3 1.3 Objectives 5 1.4 Scope of Study 6 1.5 Significant of Study 7

ix 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Causes of Erosion 10 2.3 Effects of Erosion 11 2.4 Erosion Control 14 2.5 Erosion Control Blanket 16 2.6 Coir Fibre 20 2.6.1 Coir Fibre Processing 21 2.7 Laboratory Testing 23 2.7.1 Particle Size Distribution 23 2.7.2 Moisture Content 24 2.7.3 Atterberg Limit 25 2.7.4 Direct Shear 26 2.7.5 Triaxial Compression 26 2.8 Case Study 27 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Introduction 31 3.2 Preparation of Soil Sample and Coconut Coir 33 Blanket 3.2.1 Soil Sample 34 3.2.1.1 Particle Size Analysis 34 3.2.1.2 Specific Gravity 37 3.2.1.3 Atterberg Limits 38 a. Liquid Limit 39 b. Plastic Limit 40 C. Shrinkage Limit 41 3.2.1.4 Standard Proctor Test 43 3.2.1.5 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial 45 Test

x 3.2.2 Coconut Coir Blanket 47 3.2.2.1 Tension Test 47 3.2.2.2 Direct Shear Test 48 3.3 Preparation of Slope and Rainfall Simulation Model 48 3.4 Testing 48 3.5 Result Analysis and Discussion 50 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Introduction 51 4.2 Soil Analysis 52 4.2.1 Soil Sampling 52 4.2.2 Particle Sieve Distribution 52 4.2.3 Particle Size Analyzer 53 4.2.4 Specific Gravity 54 4.2.5 Atterberg Limit 55 4.2.6 Standard Proctor Test 57 4.2.7 Shear Strength 58 4.3 Coconut Coir Blanket Analysis 61 4.3.1 Tensile Strength 61 4.3.2 Direct Shear 63 4.4. Rainfall on Slope Model Simulation Testing 65 4.4.1 Control Sample with Signal Grass Vegetation 65 for Slope of 00 4.4.2 Control Sample with Signal Grass Vegetation 66 for Slope of 100 4.4.3 Control Sample with Signal Grass Vegetation 67 for Slope of 201 4.4.4 Control Sample with Signal Grass Vegetation 68 for Slope of 30 4.4.5 Control Sample with Signal Grass Vegetation 69 for Slope of 40

xi 4.4.6 Control Sample with Signal Grass Vegetation 70 for Slope of 50 4.4.7 Control Sample with Japanese Millet 71 Vegetation for Slope of 00 4.4.8 Control Sample with Japanese Millet 72 Vegetation for Slope of 100 4.4.9 Control Sample with Japanese Millet 73 Vegetation for Slope of 200 4.4.10 Control Sample with Japanese Millet 74 Vegetation for Slope of 30 4.4.11 Control Sample with Japanese Millet 75 Vegetation for Slope of 40 4.4.12 Control Sample with Japanese Millet 76 Vegetation for Slope of 50 4.4.13 Slope Model with Signal Grass Vegetation 77 and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 00 4.4.14 Slope Model with Signal Grass Vegetation 78 and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 100 4.4.15 Slope Model with Signal Grass Vegetation 79 and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 20 4.4.16 Slope Model with Signal Grass Vegetation 80 and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 300 4.4.17 Slope Model with Signal Grass Vegetation 81 and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 40 4.4.18 Slope Model with Signal Grass Vegetation 82 and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 50 4.4.19 Slope Model with Japanese Millet 83 Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 0

xli 4.4.20 Slope Model with Japanese Millet 84 Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 100 4.4.2 1 Slope Model with Japanese Millet 85 Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 20 4.4.22 Slope Model with Japanese Millet 86 Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 30 4.4.23 Slope Model with Japanese Millet 87 Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 40 4.4.24 Slope Model with Japanese Millet 90 Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 500 4.4.25 Controlled Slope Model with Signal Grass 91 Vegetation against Controlled Slope Model with Japanese Millet Vegetation 4.4.26 Protected Slope Model with Signal Grass 92 Vegetation against Protected Slope Model with Japanese Millet Vegetation 4.4.27 Controlled Slope Model with Signal Grass 93 Vegetation against Protected Slope Model with Signal Grass Vegetation 4.4.28 Controlled Slope Model with Japanese 94 Millet Vegetation against Protected Slope Model with Japanese Millet Vegetation 4.5 Factors Affecting Results 96 4.5.1 Ambience Factor 96 4.5.2 Time Factor 96 4.5.3 Procedures Factor 96

XIII 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 introduction 99 5.2 Conclusion 100 5.2 Recommendations 102 REFERENCES 104 APPENDIX A log APPENDIX B 113 APPENDIX C 115 APPENDIX D 117 APPENDIX E 120 APPENDIX F 124 APPENDIX G 128 APPENDIX H 134 APPENDIX 1 143

xiv LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE 2.1 Erosion control blankets for soil slope stabilization 19 2.2 Coconut layers 20 2.3 Original topography and design profiles 28 2.4 Front View of Failed Slope 28 2.5 Interpreted subsoil weathering profile 30 3.1 Flow chart for the sequences of methodology 32 3.2 Sieve set 35 3.3 Particle size analyzer 36 3.4 Density bottle and specific gravity apparatus 37 3.5 Atterberg limit stages diagram 42 3.6 Cone penetration apparatus 42 3.7 Standard proctor apparatus 44 3.8 Compression device 46 3.9 Coconut coir blanket 47 4.1 Particle size distribution curve 53 4.2 Particle size analyzer curve 54 4.3 Liquid limit determination 56 4.4 Graph of dry unit weight against moisture content 57 4.5 Triaxial compression test result for soil sample BHI 59 4.6 Triaxial compression test result for soil sample BHI2 60 4.7 Triaxial compression test result for soil sample B143 60 4.8 Coconut coir blanket was tested on tensile strength machine 61

49 Tensile Strength graph 62 4.10 Soil sample with coconut coir blanket after shear test 63 4.11 Shear strength linear graph 64 4.12 Rate of Sedimentation for Control Sample with Signal 65 Grass Vegetation for Slope of 00 4.13 Rate of Sedimentation for Control Sample with Signal 66 Grass Vegetation for Slope of 101 4.14 Rate of Sedimentation for Control Sample with Signal 67 Grass Vegetation for Slope of 20 4.15 Rate of Sedimentation for Control Sample with Signal 68 Grass Vegetation for Slope of 300 4.16 Rate of Sedimentation for Control Sample with Signal 69 Grass Vegetation for Slope of 40 4.17 Rate of Sedimentation for Control Sample with Signal 70 Grass Vegetation for Slope of 50 4.18 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Control Sample with 71 Japanese Millet Vegetation for Slope of 0 4.19 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Control Sample with 72 Japanese Millet Vegetation for Slope of 100 4.20 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Control Sample with 73 Japanese Millet Vegetation for Slope of 20 4.21 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Control Sample with 74 Japanese Millet Vegetation for Slope of 30 4.22 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Control Sample with 75 Japanese Millet Vegetation for Slope of 40 4.23 Slope failure 76 4.24 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with Signal 77 Grass Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 00 4.25 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with Signal 78 Grass Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 100

xvi 4.26 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with Signal 79 Grass Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 200 4.27 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with Signal 80 Grass Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 300 4.28 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with Signal 81 Grass Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 40 4.29 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with Signal 82 Grass Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 50 4.30 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with 83 Japanese Millet Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 0 4.31 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with 84 Japanese Millet Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 10 4.32 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with 85 Japanese Millet Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 20 4.33 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with 86 Japanese Millet Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 30 4.34 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with 87 Japanese Millet Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for Slope of 40 4.35 High amount of collection in TSS for every 10 minutes 88 4.36 The collection decreased for every 10 minutes 89 4.37 Rate of Sedimentation Graph for Slope Model with 90 Japanese Millet Vegetation and Coconut Coir Blanket for

xvii Slope of 500 4.38 The comparison of Type of Grass in TSS for Controlled 91 Slope 439 The comparison of Type of Grass in TSS for Protected 92 Slope 4.40 The comparison of Type of Slope Protection using the same 93 Vegetation in TSS 4.41 The comparison of Type of Vegetation using the same 94 Slope Protection in TSS 5.1 Total Suspended Solids against Degree of Slope for all the 100 Slope Model

xv" LIST OF TABLES TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE 2.1 Physical properties of coir fibre 22 2.2 Fabric categories 22 2.3 Interpreted shear strength parameters 29 4.1 Data of specific gravity testing 55 4.2 Shear strength parameters 58

xix LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS A - Soil loss in tons/acre/year R - Rain factor K - Soil erodibility LS - Topographic factor C - Cover factor P - Practice factor c - Soil cohesion E - Young's Modulus v - Poisson's ratio c' - Effective cohesion (1)0 - Effective friction angle LL - Liquid limit PL - Plastic limit SL - Shrinkage limit Su - Undrained shear strength AL - Length deformation L0 - Initial length - Strain Gs - Specific gravity 7 - Dry unit weight Cu - Shear strength % - Percentage Rm - Micrometer - Degree mic - Micron

w% - Water content M0 - Initial mass - Stress G MD - CD - lbs - in - ac - tan - f - kpa - Machine direction Cross direction Pounds Inch Acre Tangent Internal friction Kilo Pascal - Degree Celcius ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials AASHTO - American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

wi LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX TITLE PAGE A Soil Classification 108 B Specific Gravity 113 C Atterberg Limit 115 D Standard Proctor 117 E Shear Strength 120 F Tensile Test 124 G Direct Shear 128 H Total Suspended Solids 134 I Comparison of Results 143

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of Research The surface of planet earth consists of mountains, flat grounds and water filled sea. Each of these places needs to play roles in locating developments as the world has limited ground areas for all mankind to live in. As these places are built up to meet advanced civilization, the nature on their own is changing. The ground surface of earth basically is having crust movement as the planet rotates on its axis. The ambience which lives in the atmosphere too becomes the factors which lead to the adjustment of nature physically. Thereafter, the geological cycle of earth may be classified as disturbed. Geologically, Malaysia is greatly disturbed by one of the major natural disaster which is landslide. Landslide occurs mostly at the surface of mountainous slopes that engaging danger to the residents. This alarming phenomenon can be predicted by geologists but on many cases, it happens unexpectedly leaving the residents in chaos. Lives are taken away and private properties are damaged which concurrently affect the residents spiritually and the country's economic sustainment. Many cases involved in the previous years and now seems like there is very minor improvement has been implemented in slope reinforcement due to the numerous agendas.

2 In Peninsular Malaysia, the states located in the region of north, west and south are having the gradual and evenly distributed rainfall season throughout the month of April to May and September to December,. These States comprising of Kedah, Perak, Selangor and Johor are slightly affected to the landslide occurrence as a result from heavy rainfall. Based On climatology, these places basically have a dry season starting from January. Due to this, they are least in the dilemma of landslide. Out of jurisdiction, flooding may occur from time to time in the raining season. Apparently, landslide which takes place due to human activities is normally because of major construction on the existing site. Construction works such as the cuts and excavations, removal of retaining wall or sheet piles and drawdown of water bodies can easily take leads to slope failure. Certain construction uses high technologies in order to cut hill slopes. Explosive are one of the major practice and most expensive method which being carried out. Any misleading of the explosion could simply produce unnecessary vibrations to the slope area. Another example of human activities effects will be mining and quarrying process for the purpose of construction materials trading and entrepreneurship. Underprivileged monitoring of these activities might cause the area of site to be exposed for landslide. Additionally, the construction for tunnel without proper soil investigation and effective work may contribute in slope failure too. The hill that has been drilled may be subjected to undesired settlement. More to this construction industry, the building of a damn have a major risk in developing a landslide. Water which run underneath the ground level and water pressure against the wall of the dam may create a downfall. Due to poor site investigation, a critical landslide may sweep off the entire construction area. This may happen too to completed projects for example in Malaysia itself, Jalan Semantan and Bukit Antarabangsa had landslide particularly in 2008 which killed a number of residents. Both projects are residential areas which stand aside to a retaining wall that protects the slope from settling down. These two cases were most likely the repetition of previous Highland Tower collapse back in 1985. It was a massive destruction as the whole tower fell to the side leaving few

3 survivors. It is learnt that, construction within slope areas is Still unsecured due to natural effects not human errors. Though high technology and recognized philosophies had been practiced into the matter of slope protection, flaws seemed to rise and slowly engaging total disaster. Effort on improving of the reinforcement to slope have to be revised continuously as the analogy changes because of the transition made to the environment naturally or man-made. As the deformation keeps going on, slope erosion occurs because of the soil which eroded by water and wind factor. The slope erosion is one major reason why landslide phenomenon exists. The landslide proved that better technology is highly recommended for slope embankment and more protection is seriously needful in order to have a promising Factor of Safety. 1.2 Problem Statement Soil erosion is one factor why landslide occurs. The erosion involved the human activities which development is engaged over the existing area. Due to uncontrollable scenario, the soil surface is exposed to wind and water. As the soil is being eroded, the changes made to the originality of the soil. Numerous elements are taken into discussion for the basic properties of the soil are altered. The soil will be losing nutrients and moisture, change in its structure and vegetation, and running through a salirnzation. Hence, the behaviour of the soil is deformed form its original state leaving it ineligible for many purposes. Once an area of soil becomes degraded and eroded, the particular area shall be put up for sale as it cannot be used for farmland anymore. The elements of the soil which are altered made the soil become unsuitable for plantation to grow especially at highland grounds. The maintenance fee may go higher as the soil has to be modified in order to regain its natural behaviour. Unfortunately, the value of the soil too will decrease therefore the people fanning it would be harvesting lesser or

4 reducing stock and eventually end up poorer. Regarding to this, it can be assumed that erosion causes social, economic and political consequences to farm industries. Whenever there is any presence of soil erosion, the existing ground is no longer safe for construction unless remedial measures are implemented. In residential divisions, high value residential nowadays favours the location of highland grounds that overlook scenic environment. However, the safety measures promised are vulnerable as any changes made by Mother Nature are unpredictable. Most eases that relates to residential happens when the slopes holding the houses overturn and slide resulting the houses to collapse. Lives were taken at stake. A home which is the safest area for people to live in becomes dangerous unexpectedly. Other than residential area, high rise building such as offices, academic institutions, private organizations are too exposed to landslide caused by soil erosion. These multi-storeys building faces higher risk of destruction if the foundation of the structure is disrupted by the soil erosion scenario. The foundation which holds the main structure of the building may fail and bring down the whole building. Many cases have been highlighted in previous years as soil erosion keep on occurring after intense improvement on the slope reinforcement. Most importantly, roadways which have been the network to human connections too seemed to be invaded by the severity of slope erosion. Highways which cut through a hill will be facing the dilemma of soil erosion by both sides of the excavated hill. The soil erosion which affects the roadway condition will be hazardous to the road users. Rocks, dust, and soil particles deposited by water certainly blocks the sight for the drivers. In a worsened scenario, the slope may fail thoroughly and engaging into landslide. Vehicles on the road during that particular moment may be having fatal accidents. If the destruction continues and the roadway itself collapses into lower ground, the structure of the main road is impaired. Road network is barred and transport connection is limited.

5 Seemingly, slope erosion by means of soil erosion leads to many difficulties to the nature and its surroundings. Most of the factor is withstood by the human activities themselves. The failure that damaging farmland, residential areas, high rise buildings and roadways are the major places involved. Lives are taken and properties are swept off each time a landslide occurs. As protecting slope is very important, this study leads to one of the many preventive measures by reinforcing the slope literally. 1.3 Objectives The objectives of the study are: 1. To determine the strength and durability of coconut coir matting. 2. To determine the effectiveness of the coir blanket in controlling slope erosion.

6 1.4 Scope of Study In the real world, the phenomenon of landslide cannot be forecasted of its time of occurring and how bad it is going to be. Many factors affected the movement of particles in the soil layers which were clearly subjective. The safety protections suggested and applied too were occasionally vulnerable due to the changes made by the Mother Nature. To gain such safety protections, many measures were taken into consideration. Due to this, testing was carried out based on the objectives of this study. The effectiveness of coconut coir in controlling slope erosion was determined by several testing. The related laboratory testing in this study covers in two specific engineering division. It included both Geotechnical Engineering testing and Structural Engineering testing. These two majors were mainly for the soil sample analysis and the coconut coir properties assessment respectively. For Geotechnical Engineering testing, there were Soil Classification, Atterberg Limit, Specific Gravity, Standard Proctor, Shear Strength and Direct Shear tests. While Structural Engineering highlighted on the coconut coir blanket properties assessment based on the Tensile test. In this study, a rainfall simulation model was built which contain a sloped surface of soil sample. An artificial rainfall was spurred all over the soil sample area, filtered into the layer of soil and the deposited amount of water was collected at the edge of the model. The rainfall water supplied came from a direct water supply from a water tab. The rainfall was designed to distribute the water uniformly over the soil sample area. Sprinklers were installed as to contribute in the distribution of the artificial rainfall thoroughly. Pressure gauge was connected to the main pipeline of the water supply for monitoring the water pressure so to alter the intensity of the rainfall as favoured in the testing. Each testing was gone for a one-hour raining session. The data accumulated were averaged out over 60 minutes.

7 One controlled condition of slope was to be tested with bare surface. The other condition was the sloped surfaces covered With coconut coir blanket. Both of the conditions were varied by the vegetations used which were the Signal Grass and Japanese Millet. The angles for the slope tested were 0 0, 100, 200, 30, 40 and 500. Therefore, the total number of cases was 144. The soil sample was collected from a coflstructlofl site in Bukit Gambang, Pahang. Soil which was altered extremely is most likely being disapproved as the originality of the soil content will be needed to assure the properties of natural soil. 1.5 Significant of Study The phenomenon of landslide can be factored by many aspects. There are ground conditions, geomorphological processes, physical processes and man-made processes. One of the main factors is erosion that belongs in the category of geomorphological processes as it is a norm occurrence in Malaysia. Out of the many factors, erosion is chosen to be discussed in this study in a way that excessive rainfall season in Malaysia generates the soil particles movement settled in the slope area. It is without a doubt that the well-known relationship between heavy rainfall and landslides is the major contributions to slope erosion. Remediation processes are highly important to slope failures. But practising such operation is not recognizable as prevention save lives and the human properties at the first place. Hence, remedial measures are the ones that need to be stressed out In controlling slope erosion. Geotextile proves that it is effective to reduce erosion in slopes. However, geosynthetic fibre is a new material which has better advantages than the polymerized geotextile already has. Coconut coir is the base material Selected to be used in this study as it certainly belongs in eco-friendly element. A coconut coir based blanket is fully produced naturally. The raw material used is the coconut coir alone without any additives.