Solutions to Merav Opher (2010) Problems

Similar documents
Heliophysics Shocks. Merav Opher, George Mason University,

Shocks in Heliophysics. Dana Longcope LWS Heliophysics Summer School & Montana State University

Solar&wind+magnetosphere&coupling&via&magnetic&reconnection&likely&becomes& less&efficient&the&further&a&planetary&magnetosphere&is&from&the&sun& &

THE INTERACTION OF TURBULENCE WITH THE HELIOSPHERIC SHOCK

Shock and Expansion Waves

A Multi-ion Model of the Heliosphere with Secondary Charge Exchange

Plasma depletion layer: its dependence on solar wind conditions and the Earth dipole tilt

Earth s Bow Shock and Magnetosheath

Recapitulation: Questions on Chaps. 1 and 2 #A

ESS 200C. Lectures 6 and 7 The Solar Wind

PROBLEM 1 (15 points) In a Cartesian coordinate system, assume the magnetic flux density

PHYS 643 Week 4: Compressible fluids Sound waves and shocks

How are the present solar minimum conditions transmitted to the outer heliosphere and heliosheath? John Richardson M.I.T.

PROBLEM SET. Heliophysics Summer School. July, 2013

Steady waves in compressible flow

Survey of the Solar System. The Sun Giant Planets Terrestrial Planets Minor Planets Satellite/Ring Systems

Notes #6 MAE 533, Fluid Mechanics

Space Physics. An Introduction to Plasmas and Particles in the Heliosphere and Magnetospheres. May-Britt Kallenrode. Springer

David versus Goliath 1

Some Basic Plane Potential Flows

Simulation of the plasma environment of Titan in the magnetosheath flow of Saturn

MHD Flow Field and Momentum Transfer Process of Magneto-Plasma Sail

Planetary Magnetospheres: Homework Problems

Zach Meeks. Office: Ford ES&T Phone: (918) Please let me know if you have any questions!

Intro to magnetosphere (Chap. 8) Schematic of Bow Shock and Foreshock. Flow around planetary magnetic field obstacle. Homework #3 posted

Radiative & Magnetohydrodynamic Shocks

Space Physics. ELEC-E4520 (5 cr) Teacher: Esa Kallio Assistant: Markku Alho and Riku Järvinen. Aalto University School of Electrical Engineering

MDs in INTERPLANETARY SPACE and MIRROR MODEs in PLANETARY MAGNETOSHEATHS and the HELIOSHEATH

Heliospheric Structure: The Bow Wave and the Hydrogen Wall 1

Cluster observations of sudden impulses in the magnetotail caused by interplanetary shocks and pressure increases

Space Physics (I) [AP-3044] Lecture 5 by Ling-Hsiao Lyu Oct. 2011

Cold ionospheric plasma in Titan s magnetotail

Magnetic Effects Change Our View of the Heliosheath

Real shocks: the Earth s bow shock

Role of IMF B x in the solar wind magnetosphere ionosphere coupling

26. Non-linear effects in plasma

In which of the following scenarios is applying the following form of Bernoulli s equation: steady, inviscid, uniform stream of water. Ma = 0.

58:160 Intermediate Fluid Mechanics Bluff Body Professor Fred Stern Fall 2014

SPACE PHYSICS ADVANCED OPTION ON THE SOLAR WIND AND HELIOSPHERE

Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit

IX. COMPRESSIBLE FLOW. ρ = P

ROTATIONAL ASYMMETRY OF EARTH S BOW SHOCK

The Solar Resource: The Active Sun as a Source of Energy. Carol Paty School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences January 14, 2010

Deformation of ICME and MC on 1 30 AU Seen by Voyager 2 and WIND

Simulations of MHD waves in Earth s magnetospheric waveguide

Aerothermodynamics of high speed flows

Phase-standing whistler fluctuations detected by SELENE and ARTEMIS around the Moon

Aerothermodynamics of High Speed Flows

Probing the Edge of the Solar System: Formation of an Unstable Jet-Sheet

VII. Hydrodynamic theory of stellar winds

Stability of the High-Latitude Reconnection Site for Steady. Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo Alto, CA

High-latitude Bow Shock: Tilt Angle Effects

SOLAR MHD Lecture 2 Plan

ICMs and the IPM: Birds of a Feather?

Gravity Waves Gravity Waves

Introduction to the Sun and the Sun-Earth System

SW103: Lecture 2. Magnetohydrodynamics and MHD models

Magnetic flux pileup and plasma depletion in Mercury s subsolar magnetosheath

A global study of hot flow anomalies using Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements

Cluster observations of hot flow anomalies

arxiv: v1 [physics.space-ph] 19 Jul 2018

Lecture 14: Solar Cycle. Observations of the Solar Cycle. Babcock-Leighton Model. Outline

FUNDAMENTALS OF MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (MHD)

Plasma properties at the Voyager 1 crossing of the heliopause

cos 6 λ m sin 2 λ m Mirror Point latitude Equatorial Pitch Angle Figure 5.1: Mirror point latitude as function of equatorial pitch angle.

Numerical Study of Compressible Isothermal Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence

Planetary Magnetospheres

Shock Waves. = 0 (momentum conservation)

Statistical analysis of the reflection of incident O + pickup ions at Mars: MAVEN observations

Modeling Magnetosphere-Solar Wind Interactions with Basic Fluid Dynamics Alexander Freed

The properties and causes of rippling in quasi-perpendicular collisionless shock fronts

1. Introduction Some Basic Concepts

Exercises for Multivariable Differential Calculus XM521

Observations of an interplanetary slow shock associated with magnetic cloud boundary layer

arxiv: v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 17 Aug 2015

THE ACCURACY OF PRESENT MODELS OF THE HIGH ALTITUDE POLAR MAGNETOSPHERE

MHD Simulation of Solar Chromospheric Evaporation Jets in the Oblique Coronal Magnetic Field

Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements

Statistical study of the alteration of the magnetic structure of þÿ m a g n e t i c c l o u d s i n t h e E a r t h s m a g n e t o s h e a t h

The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: The St. Patrick day (17 March 2015) event

Interstellar Neutral Atoms and Their Journey Through the Heliosphere Elena Moise

Planetary magnetospheres

Perpendicular Flow Separation in a Magnetized Counterstreaming Plasma: Application to the Dust Plume of Enceladus

Modeling the Size and Shape of Saturn s Magnetopause with Variable Dynamic Pressure

Plasma depletion layer: the role of the slow mode waves

Kinetic effects on ion escape at Mars and Venus: Hybrid modeling studies

Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit

Shocks in the ICM and the IPM

The Dependence of the Magnetic Field Near the Subsolar Magnetopause on IMF in Accordance with THEMIS Data

A Cluster Multi-Spacecraft Study of Earth s Bow Shock

Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit

Lab #2: Activity 5 Exploring the Structure of the Solar Magnetic Field Using the MAS Model

1/3/2011. This course discusses the physical laws that govern atmosphere/ocean motions.

Pickup Proton Instabilities and Scattering in the Distant Solar Wind and the Outer Heliosheath: Hybrid Simulations

Magnetic Reconnection in ICME Sheath

mswim.engin.umich.edu K.C. Hansen

What is New in the Outer Heliosphere?: Voyager and IBEX

Imaging Spectroscopy of a Type II solar radio burst observed by LOFAR

Sound Waves Sound Waves:

Magnetic Drivers of CME Defection in the Low Corona

Transcription:

Solutions to Merav Opher 00 Problems. The normal of the shock is Since from the plot you can obtain all the three components of Bu and Bd, the normal can be easily found. The shock speed is: With the shock Theta_Bn can be found. Alfven mach number, sonic mach number as well as the compression are easy and can be obtained directly using the graphs.. Considering a shock coordinate system where the parallel axis is along the normal of the shock, n ˆ cos" R ˆ + sin" cos# T ˆ + sin" sin# N ˆ, where θ and φ are the angles between the normal n and the radial upstream velocity V. θ is defined as the angle measured between n and R. φ is the angle between the projection of n on the T, N plan and T see Supplementary figure. The perpendicular axis are taken as, and. The three-dimensional Rankine-Hugoniot conditions in this shock coordinate system after a transformation to the dehoffman -Teller frame are: v v r v " v " v " v " + B B r #v v A v # rv A Eqs. -3 where the index and refer respectively, to the upstream and downstream quantities; V A is the upstream Alfven speed. In the RTN frame Eqs. -3 become: Page of 9

V R V cos" # V ' S & cos" % r + V sin " sin * + & # # V cos" sin" cos* + tan, & + % r # V cos" #V S V A cos, V cos" #V S # r V A cos, ' cos" sin" cos* + V T V cos" # V S ' & sin" % r sin* + & + # V cos" sin" cos* + tan, & + V cos" #V % S r # V cos" #V S V A cos, # r V A cos, ' + Eqs.4-6 " V N V cos!! V % S 'sin! sin"! V cos! sin! sin" # r & # "! V cos! sin! cos" + tan r! V cos!!v S V A cos! % ' sin! cos" sin!! sin " sin # + cos ", χ is the angle between B and the shock # V cos!!v S! r V A cos! normal: # '! cos! sin" cos# and r is the compression ratio, rρ /ρ. & 3. The Termination Shock at the time of the Voyager crossing had, on average, for θ5, φ65. 4. The students should sketch the main MHD variables for a tangential discontinuity heliopause so total pressure should be constant. They should also be able to sketch the jump at the termination shock. They should be able to compare Voyager and and qualitatively see that the magnetic pressure at Voyager will be stronger therefore the heliopause will be closer to the sun than Voyager. Page of 9

Shocks, Homework 5. a. The hydrodynamic jump conditions for plasma, γ 5/3, are M M + 3 5M 5 ρ v n, 4 4, ρ v n, + 3/M where limits are for M. We can use these to write p ρ v γm This gives the temperature 3 v 3 6 v 3 6 v sw. 3 T B m p k B p B ρ B 3m p 3k B v sw. 4 A simplified of the day-side magnetosphere. Flow streamlines are shown as solid curves originating at the Sun, far to the left. The bow shock is a dashed arc and the magnetopause is a thick solid arc. The magnetosphere proper is dark grey, with some white magnetic field lines shown. The magnetosheath is the lighter greay region between the bow shock and the magnetopause. b. Using eq. 3 gives and thus From this we find p B v B, 5 6 ρ B p B + ρ B 5 v B 6 5 p B ρ B T S 6 5 T B m p 0k B v sw. 05 K Taking v sw 800 km/s gives T S 7.7 0 6 K. p S ρ S. 6 v sw. 7 00 km/s Page 3 of 9

c. It is clear from eq. that Adiabatic compression leads to the ratio ρ B 4 ρ sw. 8 ρ S ρ B /γ TS T B 3/ TS T B 6 3/.0. 9 5 From this we find d. The flow angle is defined ρ S 6 3/ 4 ρ sw 4.407 ρ sw. 0 5 tan θ j v t,j v n,j where v t, the flow tangent to the shock, is the same on both sides. This leads to tanθ v t v The deflection across the shock is 4 v t v 4 tanθ. θ θ θ 4 θ θ 3θ, 3 after using the small angle approximation to replace tanθ j θ j. e. The post-shock velocity vector is v v n,ˆn + v t,ˆt v n, [ ˆn + tan θ ˆt ] v n, [ ˆn + 4 tanθ ˆt ] 4 where ˆn is the shock normal and ˆt a tangent vector perpendicular to it. The square magnitude is therefore Compared to the local sound speed this is v v n, [ + 6 tan θ ]. 5 v c s, v n, [ + 6 tan θ c ] M [ + 6 tan θ ] s, 5 [ + 6 tan θ ], using the hypersonic limit from eq.. Setting this to exceed one gives the requirement tanθ >, θ > tan / 6.5. 6 f. The radial and poloidal velocities are v r ψ r sin θ θ A r Rmp A v θ r sin θ ψ r R mp R mp R3 mp cosθ, 7 r 3 4 r + R3 mp Rmp r 3 sin θ, 8 Page 4 of 9

so evidently A is negative. The angle of the downstream flow relative to the shock normal, ˆn ˆr, at r R bs, just inside the bow shock, is tan θ v θ 4R bs/r mp 3 + R mp /R bs tan θ. 9 v r R bs /R mp 3 R mp /R bs According to part d. this must be tanθ 4 tanθ, and θ θ, to polar angle, since the flow is horizontal outside the shock. This leads to the relation 4R bs /R mp 5 + R bs /R mp 5 4, 0 and therefore R bs 9 4 /5 R mp.8 R mp. This result is often cast in terms of the stand-off distance between the bow shock and magnetopause: R bs R mp 0.8 R mp, M sw. The simple model proposed above, a super-sonic flow encountering a spherical obstacle of radius R, is one for which there has been much study. Laboratory experiments with different Mach numbers and different fluids i.e. differing γ have led to empirical relations of the form R α ρ, 3 ρ with values α 0.78 Seiff, NASA Tech. Pub. 4, [96]. Numerical solutions of fully compressible hydrodynamics yield α. Spreiter, Summers & Alkse, Planet. Space Sci. 4 3 [966], which has been subsequently used to predict the stand-off distance of the actual bow shock, at least for cases with high solar wind Mach number see Farris & Russell, JGR 99, 768 [994]. The simplified calculation we have performed here has found a lower value, α 0.8 4 0.704, due mostly to the departure of actual post-shock flow from the incompressible solution we assumed. It is not, however, due to our assumption of a spherical magnetopause. As shown in part e., the sheath flow becomes supersonic beyond an angle of θ 6. Inside this small region there is little difference between a sphere and the actual magnetopuase. Differences outside that region can affect neither the subsonic solution nor the stand-off distance. 3 Page 5 of 9

6. a. The velocity difference is equal to v f, and at high Mach number this difference is v f v v v v 3 v v 4. 4 Since the pre-shock material is at rest relative to the Sun, the shock moves downward at speed v v s v 4 3 v f. 5 b. The post-shock velocity, in the shock frame, is Using the fact that v /c s, M / 5 we find that 5 3 v 4 v 3 v f. 6 v f c s,f c s,f 5 3 v f 7 The downward flows is therefore related to the post-shock temperature T f 3 m c s, 5 k m vf 0 7 v f K. 8 B 3 k B 00 km/s c. After reflection there is a new shock propagating upward into the flare plasma. The velocity difference is the same, v v v f, but the pre-shock plasma of this shock is the post-shock plasma from the incident shock: the flaring plasma. This is not, however, a high Mach-number shock so v f v v v v c s,f M 3 4 3 4 M v M + 6 8M 3 4 c s,f M M. 9 The results of the previous section therefore lead to the condition 3 M 4 M v f 3. 30 c s,f 5 This is a quadratic equations whose positive solution is M 5. This is the Mach number of the reflected shock. d. The reflected shock enhances the pressure by p 5M p 4 v 6, 3 above the pressure following the first, hypersonic, shock. This pressure is p 3 4 ρ ṽ 4 3 ρ 0 v f, 3 where ρ 0 is the pre-flare coronal density. The the final chromospheric pressure is p chr. 6 4 3 ρ c v f 8 ρ 0 v f. 33 4 Page 6 of 9

e. The transmitted shock raises the pressure by p p 8 ρ 0 v f p 0 5 4 M, 34 where p 0 and ρ 0 are pre-flare coronal values; the pre-flare chromosphere is at the same pressure as the pre-flare corona since they are separated by a contact discontinuity. Using the fact that p 0 /ρ 0 3/5c s,0 this becomes from which we see that M 40v f 3c s,0 5 4 M, 35 3/3v f /c s,0. It does not depend on r. f. Since the pre-flare chromosphere is colder than the pre-flare corona by /r, its sound speed is c s,0 / r. This is the sound speed by which the pre-shock speed, v, is divided to form M. The velocity difference is then v v c s,0 / r 3 4 v c s,0 / r 3 4 M 6 v f c s,0. 36 This shows that the velocity jump across the transmitted shock is v v 6 r v f. 37 Since the pre-shock material is at rest this is the downward velocity of the transmitted shock. In order to neglect this velocity in the reflected shock we need 6/r. 5 Page 7 of 9

7:5UT first 7:49UT second n [cm 3 ].6 4.5 v R [km/s] 349.5 95.9 v T [km/s] 64.80 79.4 v N [km/s] 37.98 59.75 B R [nt] 0.07.000 B T [nt] -.759-0.908 B N [nt] -.93 -.474 7. a. A shock always compresses the plasma so the post-shock region will have the higher density the second observation is pre-shock. This is the second region to pass the spacecraft, and therefore lies at smaller radius than the post-shock region. The shock normal ˆn must point toward the pre-shock region so ˆn ˆr < 0. This is therefore a reverse shock. b. Taking the dot product with ˆn shows ˆn [B] [ˆn B] [B n ] 0, 38 from the jump condition following from B 0. This shows that [B] is orthogonal to ˆn. c. The jump in velocity is [v] ˆn[v n ] + [v ] ˆn[v n ] + B n [B ] ˆn[v n ] + B n [B]. 39 4πρv n 4πρv n In the special case that [v n ] 0, the two jumps [v] and [B], lie along the same line they are parallel or anti-parallel. This condition is equivalent to [ρ] 0, which is a rotational discontinuity. This does no apply here since n p n p. Thus the velocity jump is a sum of two perpendicular components and lies in the plane spanned by them: [B] and ˆn. d. First we compute the differences directly B 0.97, 0.85,.46 µg, v 53.57, 4.34,.77 km/s whose magnitudes are B.95 µg, v 59.58 km/s We can extract from v that component perpendicular to B v B w v B B v 8. B 5.47, 6.8, 4.9 km/s 40 3.79 The normal vector ˆn must have unit magnitude and a negative radial component ˆn w 0.866, 0.7, 0.49 w 6 Page 8 of 9

e. The dot product of the normal vector with the magnetic fields gives the angles cos θ B ˆn B cos θ B ˆn B f. From the expressions we find and Solving this gives.73.00.73 3.4 0.866, θ 50.000 0.507, θ 0.438 M A n n M A M A tanθ M A tanθ tanθ tan θ M A tanθ n /n tanθ M A 5.000, M A 3.04 n n M A tan θ g. We have several pieces of evidence that this is a fast shock. We could have noted early on that B > B. Later it was evident that B had deflected away from the shock normal although it appears that θ < θ because the field is directed backwards. Finally, we wee that the Mach numbers are ordered which is a prerequisite for the fast shock. < M A < M A, 4 h. The Alfvén Mach number refers to the normal component of the upstream velocity v,n in the reference frame of the shock. If we denote the shock speed v s the inflow speed is therefore v n, v n, v s M A v A,n, 4 since the inflow is always in the direction opposite ˆn. The shock speed is therefore v s v n, + M A v A,n, 43 where v,n is the component of the velocity, in the spacecrtaft frame, v n, ˆn v.0 0 7 cm/s 0 km/s. The normal component of the Alfvén velocity is v An, B ˆn 4πn m p.73 0 5 G 9.44 0.83 0 6 cm/s 8.3 km/s. This gives the shock velocity in the reference frame of the spacecraft v s 0 + 5.00 8.3 km/s 8 km/s, 44 The shock propagates in the direction of the shock normal giving v s ˆn v s 03, 3., 49.7 km/s. 45 The shock is therefore moving outward from the Sun, even though it is a reverse shock. 7 Page 9 of 9