INTERACTIONS WITH TWO-BODY AND QUASI TWO-BODY FINAL STATES. R. E. Diebold Argonne National Laboratory. E. Fowler Duke University

Similar documents
Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Physics 492 Lecture 28

Today, I will present the first of two lectures on neutron interactions.

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

16) Differential cross sections and spin density matrix elements for the reaction p p, M. Williams

Neutron Sources Fall, 2017 Kyoung-Jae Chung Department of Nuclear Engineering Seoul National University

Neutrino interaction at K2K

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2012

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

What about the pentaquark?

Trade Patterns, Production networks, and Trade and employment in the Asia-US region

Longitudinal Phasespace Analysis. A technique to apply kinematic cuts to enhance different reaction mechanisms. Derek Glazier University of Glasgow

Hadronic Resonances in a Hadronic Picture. Daisuke Jido (Nuclear physics group)

I$p - pki BACKWARD SCATTERING FROM 1.0 TO 7.5 GeV/c *

Progress in measuring GMR in unstable nuclei: Decay detector calibration and inverse reaction experiment. J. Button, Y.-W. Lui, and D.H.

The Ring Branch. Nuclear Reactions at. Mass- and Lifetime Measurements. off Exotic Nuclei. Internal Targets. Electron and p. Experiments: Scattering

Objectives: Atomic Structure: The Basics

FYS3510 Subatomic Physics. Exam 2016

Baryon Spectroscopy in COMPASS p p p f π + π p s p p p f K + K p s. Alex Austregesilo for the COMPASS Collaboration

Investigation of hadronic matter properties with heavy ion collisions Particle production and flow from SIS to FAIR. Yvonne Leifels GSI

A Measurement of the Induced polarization of electro-produced Λ(1116) with CLAS

Baryon resonances in asymmetric nuclear matter:

Hadron Physics with Photon Beam at LEPS/ LEPS2 Takashi Nakano (RCNP, Osaka Univ.) HHIQCD2015, March 3rd, 2015

HYPERON PRODUCTION ASYMMETRIES IN 500 GeV/c PION NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS

Hyperon Particle Physics at JHF. R. E. Mischke

Optimizing Selection and Sensitivity Results for VV->lvqq, 6.5 pb -1, 13 TeV Data

Hadron Spectroscopy at COMPASS

The Standard Model. 1 st 2 nd 3 rd Describes 3 of the 4 known fundamental forces. Separates particle into categories

Measurement of W-boson production in p-pb collisions at the LHC with ALICE

DESY Physics Review Committee, Oct. 28, H1 Status Report. Cristinel Diaconu CPP Marseille / DESY. H1 data taking in 2004

Neutron interactions and dosimetry. Eirik Malinen Einar Waldeland

Measurements of Particle Production in pp-collisions in the Forward Region at the LHC

Physics Quarknet/Service Learning

Compositeness of hadrons and near-threshold dynamics Tetsuo Hyodo

R-hadrons and Highly Ionising Particles: Searches and Prospects

A COMPARISON OF K*N CHARGE EXCHANGE REACTIONS. AT 8.5 AND 13 GeV/c *

Lecture PowerPoint. Chapter 32 Physics: Principles with Applications, 6 th edition Giancoli

AGH-UST University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow, Poland

Lecture 8. CPT theorem and CP violation

The photoneutron yield predictions by PICA and comparison with the measurements

Studying the nuclear pairing force through. Zack Elledge and Dr. Gregory Christian

R. P. Redwine. Bates Linear Accelerator Center Laboratory for Nuclear Science Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Lecture 14 Krane Enge Cohen Williams Nuclear Reactions Ch 11 Ch 13 Ch /2 7.5 Reaction dynamics /4 Reaction cross sections 11.

Double Charm Baryon Studies in SELEX: Further Studies and Production Questions James Russ, Carnegie Mellon Outline

Part II Particle and Nuclear Physics Examples Sheet 1

Sven Schumann. DPG Spring Meeting

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

UGC ACADEMY LEADING INSTITUE FOR CSIR-JRF/NET, GATE & JAM PHYSICAL SCIENCE TEST SERIES # 4. Atomic, Solid State & Nuclear + Particle

Chapter V: Interactions of neutrons with matter

LEPS Physics HOTTA, Tomoaki (RCNP, Osaka University) on behalf of the LEPS&LEPS2 collaboration

PHL424: Feynman diagrams

Reactor Physics: Basic Definitions and Perspectives. Table of Contents

Detecting ν τ s: the CHORUS and OPERA experience. Pasquale Migliozzi

in high statistics experiments at CLAS

Proton-lead measurements using the ATLAS detector

Open heavy-flavour production in pp, p Pb and Pb Pb collisions in ALICE

Nuclear Reactions A Z. Radioactivity, Spontaneous Decay: Nuclear Reaction, Induced Process: x + X Y + y + Q Q > 0. Exothermic Endothermic

Updated results of the OPERA long baseline neutrino experiment

x + P - n + (anything), (1 )

Lecture 02. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part I The Particles

Properties of the nucleus. 8.2 Nuclear Physics. Isotopes. Stable Nuclei. Size of the nucleus. Size of the nucleus

POLARIMETER WORKING GROUP - D.G. Crabb Department of Physics, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI

Recent Results from 7 GeV proton proton running at CMS

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

Nuclear reactions and nuclear ssion

Compound and heavy-ion reactions

M.Battaglieri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Genova - Italy. A Forward Photon Tagging Facility for CLAS12

A brief history of neutrino. From neutrinos to cosmic sources, DK&ER

PoS(Baldin ISHEPP XXII)042

Pubblicazioni dal 2008 al 2013

Properties of the nucleus. 9.1 Nuclear Physics. Isotopes. Stable Nuclei. Size of the nucleus. Size of the nucleus

Nuclear Physics. PHY232 Remco Zegers Room W109 cyclotron building.

Neutrino Cross Section Measurements for Long-Baseline Acceleratorbased Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

C NS. Direct reactions of Borromean nuclei FM50. S. Shimoura CNS, University of Tokyo

Isospin. K.K. Gan L5: Isospin and Parity 1

SPIN STRUCTURE OF THE NUCLEON AND POLARIZATION. Charles Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford CA 94309

Measurements of charm and beauty proton structure functions F2 c c and F2 b b at HERA

Introduction to Nuclear Physics

Recent Result on Pentaquark Searches from

Charm and Beauty Structure of the proton

176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s

Baryon Oscillations and CP Violation. David McKeen University of Pittsburgh INT Workshop INT-17-69W, Oct. 26, 2017

The experiment at JINR: status and physics program

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Double Parton Scattering in CMS. Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x th June 2017 Bari, Italy

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)309. Electroweak Physics at LHCb

Interactions of Radiation with Matter

Slide 1 / 57. Nuclear Physics & Nuclear Reactions Practice Problems

PHL424: Nuclear fusion

A Comparison between Channel Selections in Heavy Ion Reactions

Scattering Processes. General Consideration. Kinematics of electron scattering Fermi Golden Rule Rutherford scattering cross section

?: 2 GeV from the CERN and Columbia-BNL

HASPECT in action: CLAS12 analysis of

Physics 111 Homework Solutions Week #9 - Friday

The Neutron Structure Function from BoNuS

Chapter 9. Rutherford Scattering, Radioactive Decay, Energetic Atomic Collisions

Particle Physics Outline the concepts of particle production and annihilation and apply the conservation laws to these processes.

(10%) (c) What other peaks can appear in the pulse-height spectrum if the detector were not small? Give a sketch and explain briefly.

The Quark Parton Model

Proof by Induction. Andreas Klappenecker

Transcription:

1 SS5 2021 2024 INTERACTIONS WITH TWOBODY AND QUASI TWOBODY FINAL STATES R. E. Diebold Argonne National Laboratory E. Fowler Duke University R. M. Heinz Indiana University F. Pipkin Harvard University and J. Prentice University of Toronto ABSTRACT To aid in the design of spectrometer systems at NAL, highenergy reactions with two particles or resonances in the final state are tabulated. This report summarizes in a systematic manner reactions with two particles or resonances in the final state; some threebody finalstate reactions are also given. The main purpose of this summary is to aid in the design of spectrometer systems at NAL. We have considered only proton targets. In many experiments the target will be polarized, and in evaluating the spectrometer systems this should be taken into account. The nuclear contamination in the present polarized targets requires the observation of both the scattered and recoil particle to make an unambiguous measurement. In general one will want to use deuteron and nuclear targets in addition to proton targets. The reaction particles have been divided into four categories: beam particles, stable particles, metastable particles, and unstable particles. Table I summarizes the four categories. The division is based in part on particle lifetime. The stable particles will under ordinary circumstances not decay in the apparatus; the metastable particles, will in some cases decay. and in some cases not decay depending upon their momentathe unstable particles will always decay in a very short distance 1

2 885 and thus must be reconstructed from a multibody state. Hyperon beams, gamma beams, electron beams, and muon beams have been treated separately. They usually have special problems which make it necessary to tailor the apparatus to them. For observing the unstable particles, it is necessary to observe one of the many possible decay modes. Table 11 summarizes some of the decay modes for each of the unstable bosons. Where several modes are available, we have chosen the modes consisting of the fewest uncharged particles. Table 111 summarizes the decay modes of the other unstable particles. A summary of the reaction list is the following: 1. Reactions with two stable particles in the final state. 11. (A) Reactions with one stable and one metastable particle in the final state. (B) Reactions with one stable and one unstable particle in the final state. Ill. (A) Reactions with two metastable particles in the final state. (B) Reactions with one metastable and One unstable particle in the final state. (C) Reactions with two unstable particles in the final state. IV. Reactions with hyperon beams. V. Reactions with 'I, e, and f1 beams. VI. Reactions with three particle final states. For each of these reactions, there are in general three kinematic regions: forward scattering, backward scattering, and largeangle scattering. The following classes of particles have not been included just to simplify the table and not because of any judgment as to whether or not they are important. * (K) N with I = 5/2 (K K) Z (8 = i baryons) I = 2, 8 = 0, B = bosons a K O L 2

3 SS5 Table 1. Particle Classifications. Stable Metastable Unstable Beam Particles Particles Particles Particles T ~ 10 8 sec T ~ 10 10 sec T ~ 10 13 sec Note: ± ± rr rr A rr ± ± ± K K :E T) So, p p :Eo n n 0 (boson)±' p KO K*' ±,o Ii s N)lt.,0,. d T: particle halflife y*: I = 0 or I = 1 hyperon resonances boson: nonstrange boson resonances N*: I = 1/Z or I = 3/Z nonstrange baryon resonances MM: missing mass v: 0, ± MM Table II. Decay Modes for Unstable Bosons. ± (Boson) Classification Decay Examples G = 1 rr ± rr ± p, g ± G = 1 rr rr rr A A 1, 2 ± 0 JP unnatural, G = t 1T 'IT 1T 1T B JP natural, G = ± t 0 KK A Z' N (1016) (Boson)o G = t rr rr po, f G = t co, At' A Z JP unnatural, G = t 1T 1T 1T 1T B JP natural, G = ± t KK q f' :s*' 0, 3

4 SS5 Table III. Common Decay Modes for K* N*, v, and::;:* Particle State * * ± K (K) Decay Modes ± 0 K rr (N* ) * (N ) ± K rr rr K rr K rr pit 0 prr rr nn rr o prr nrr prr rr pit 0 prr rr nrr y * (y) * ± o ± :!: rr ± 0 :!: rr ± :!: rr rr. ± ± :!: rr rr (y) * (y) * nk 4

5 SS5 Particle State Decay Modes y * (y*)o ATT ~OTTO ± ~ TT pk nko ± l; 1T1T (::=;)* (::=; * ) 2: 1T ::=; TT ::=; TT TT I; K I; K I; K TT AK (::=;0)* ::=; TT 0 :s 1T 1T I; Ko I; KTT AKo I. Two Stable Particles in Final State TT' TT' P P TT P P d K' P K' p p p p p p P TT d P P P p p p n n p P TT TT P P K K n p n p 5

6 SS5 II. (A) One Stable Particle and One Metastable Particle in the Final Sta te 'II P K ~ 'II P K ~, K ~' P 'II K P K II. (B) One Stable and One Unstable Particle in the Final State,, * 'II P 'II (N ), 'II P P (boson),, 'II P K (y*t,, 'II P d N*', 'II P P (MM) 'II P n (MM) 'II P 'II (MM) 'II P 'II (MM) 'II P K (MM) 'II P K (MM) * 'II 'II (N P 0 'II 'II n P 'II P n (bosont 'II P P (MM) 'II P n (MMt 'II P 'II (MM) p 'II (MM) 'II P K (MM) 'II P K (MM) K' * K' P (N ) K' * p (K), p K P d y*, K P P (MM) K P n (MM) K P 'II (MM) K P 'II (MM) K P K (MM) K P K (MM) K P K O n s 6

7 SS5 II. (B) One Stable and One Unstable Particle in the Final State K p (KO{ n K p 1T (Y) K p K (:=:* ) K p p (MM) K p n (MM)o K P 1T (MM) K p 1T (MM) K p K (MM) K p K (MM) ~::: p p p (N ) n ~~ (N ) d (boson) p (MM) n (MM) 1T 1T (MM) (MM) K (MM) K (MM) n p n (N * ) p P p (N*)o d 1T d (boson)o p (MM)o n (MM) 1T (MM)o 1T (MM) K (MM)o K (MM), 1T (boson), K' (K) r, p (N*) (N)'F p n: * 0 (N ) (N)o n p (MM) 7

8 SS5 II. (B) One Stable and One Unstable Particle in the Final State p p n (MM)o 1T (MM) 1T (MM) K (MM) K (MMt III. (A) Two Metastable Particles in the Final State 1T P KO s!i. K P KO s 2 P P KO KO s s x A L' L' 0 0 :s :=;0 :=:0 III. (B) One Metastable and One Unstable Particle in the Final State * 1T P!I. (K ) ~::: L (K)!I. (MM) L' (MM), :=:,0 (MM), 0 (MM) K~ (MM) 1T P!I. (K*)o L (K) KO LO S L (K * )!I. (MM)o L' (MM), :=:~ 0 (MMt.,0 0 (MM) KO s (MM)o ~::: K P KO s (N )!I. (MM) L' (MM)' 8

9 SS5 III. (B) One Metastable and One Unstable Particle in the Final State :=:,0 K P (MMt' Q (MM) Kg (MM) K P A (boson)o ~' (boson), :=:,0 * (K), K O s (:;::*)0 K~ * 0 (N ) A (MM)o ~' (MM), S,o (MM)'o Q (MM) K O (MM)o s P P K O (K*)o s x (Y*) 0 A (y*)o * ~ (Y ), (y*), ~, _ :=:,0 (:;::*),0..., a (:;::*),0 A (MM)o ~, (MM), :=: r, 0 (MMt,o Q (MM) K~ (MM)o K (MM)o ~ ~, (MM), :=;.0 (MM)'o rr (MM) K~ (MM)o III. (C) Two Unstable Particles in the Final State IT P (boson) (N* ) 0 t,: IT (N ) * 7] (N ) ~o :(: (K ) 9

10 SSS III. (C) Two Unstable Particle s in the Final State 1T P 1T P K P (bosont (boson) * (K ) 1T TJ E ~:o: (N ) * (N ) * (Y ) (MM) (MM) (MM) (boson),. (MM)', (K*)'. (MMt,. (N*t', 0, (MMt., (y* ),, (MM)', (::;:<'). (MM)' 1T (N*)o TJ (N*)o EO (K*)o (boson)o (N*)o (boson) (N ) '~) (boson) (N (K ) (Y) * (K)o (y*)o 1T (MM)o TJ (MMjo EO (MMt (boson)', (MM)',0 (K*)''o (MM)',0 (N*t',0, (MM),,0. (y*),,0 (MM)''o (::;:*). (MMt,o :>;: (K) (N*) (K)o ~:: (N ) 1T (MM) TJ (MM) '1:,0 (MM) (boson), (MM)', (K*)', a (MM)', (N<')', v, (MM)o.., 10

11 SS5 III. (e) Two Unstable Particles in the Final State K P K p p p n P (y*t r, C::;*), 1T T) 1T T) (boson), (boson)o (K*)' (K*t,o 1T T) L,0 (boson), (K)', (N)., 0, (y*t,, (S':'), (N*t,o 1T T) L, (boson),, * ~ 7 0 (K ) (Nt,, 0, (y)., C::;),o (N*)o, 1T T) L, (boson), (K*t, (Nt', 0, (y,:,),, (S*) (MMt (MM) (y':')o (Y) L,0 L, (Y) L,0 *, (N*t,o ':: (s ). (MM)o (MM)o (MM)o (MM)''o (MM)''o (MM),,0, (MM)',0 (MMt,o (N')' (MM) (MM) (MM) (MM)', (MMt,, (MM)O.,, (MM)', (MM) (N*)' (MM) (MM) (MM) (MM)o,, (MM)o,, (MM),0,, (MM)o,, (MM)' 11

12 SS5 III. (e) Two Unstable Particles in the Final State IV. (A) Incident A p P 1T 0 1T 1T I] 0 1T (boson)o I] I] I] (boson)o :l;0 :l;0 :l;0 (Y':')O ~ (y)o :?,: (K) ':: (K ) (K'~)O (K':')O, (N')', 0, (N*)', 0, (y~,), r (Y'),, C=:*),o (:=:), 1T (MM)o I] (MM)o :l;0 (MM)o :l;0 (MM)o (boson)',0 (K)', (MM)''o (MM)''o (N*t',, (MM)',,0 (N'~)',, (MMt',, (y,,),, (MM)''o (y),, (MM)',0 c::*),0 (MM)'o (:::), (MM)'o 1. Two Stable Particles in Final State 2. One Stable A P _ d (MM)o Stable a. With Metastable A P A P :l; n K~ d 12

13 SSs IV. (A) Incident A b. With Unstable A P ~o P *0 K d *0 y P 3. Neither Stable P (MM)o n (MM) d (MM)o K (MM)o K a. Two Metastable None IV. (B) Incident :!:, (MM),, (MM)o (MM) P (MM) b. One Metastable, One Unstable * A P A N N*o * N c. Two Unstable A ~O * P N :t:~ Y *0 N y * N*o * * Y N 1. Two Stable ~ P L ~' P P 2. One Stable a. One Metastable L p ~ p ~ P P K d (MM), Stable K~ n 13

14 SS5 IV. (B) Incident 2:: ' a. One Stable b. One Unstable 2:: y*' P P P (MM) n (MM). 1T (MM)' K' (MM) P (MM) 0 2:: P 2:: n 3. Neither Stable K*' d y*' p y*'o n * ::=: K P a. Two Metastable None (MM) n (MM)o. 1T (MM) K' (MM), p (MM) b. One Metastable and One Unstable :E p:e N*' A N * :E P A N*'o :E N* K~ N*'o c. Two Unstable :E P y* N'\ y*o N :Eo N*' :E P :Eo N*' y*~oj, N~~JOJ. 14

15 SS5 v. y, e. f1 Note: For inelastic e or f1 scattering one can replace: yp X by ep 1X 2 ex 1X 2 or f1p f'.x X 1 2 1. Both Stable 2. One Stable y P Y P 1T n n d e P e P f1 P f1 P a. Other Metastable y P K A b. Other Unstable 0 y 1T P P 1] P K 0 ~ N':o 1T 1T N*' K y*.o (boson)o P (boson) n (N'~. 0) d Ii d ~::. N':' Y ~:(, e P e N ~J: f1 P f1 N 3. Neither Stable a. Both Metastable KO Y P ~ b. One Metastable, One Unstable y P KO y. K*'o ~ K, A 15

16 SS5 V. y, e, fl 3. Neither Stable c. Both Unstable y P rr 0 N:''':~ I) N':', (boson)o N':', (bosont N':',o (boson) N':' K' :1: 0 K' y':'.o K,o y'~' VI. Three Particle Final States In addition to quasi two body reactions, it is probable that there will be considerable interest in more than twobody final states resulting from multiperipheral processes, cascade decays of resonances, etc. Using an extension of the classification system employed in Sees. I to Ill, it is possible to write lists of reactions for threebody and quasi threebody final states. This has been done only for the three stable particle case. It is shown that all the reactions of Sec. VI are already included in the decay products of quasi twobody final states if one includes sufficiently massive (boson)±' 0, N*, v, and E * to permit decays such as :=:*, 0 rl K. This is equally true of the threebody kinematic configurations if one includes forward, backward, and largeangle production as well as sequential decays of heavy resonances. 16

j 7 SS5 VI. Three Stable Particle Final States Already Beam Target Final State Included, e.g.. P P 0 p p p K n) n [ n N' * (boson)o n (boson) p K n [ K Y' * (boson)o n p P p n (bosonjo n P K' P K P n d N*' d K ~ n K'N*' K P K 0 d K N*' KO L p P p K K rl K ';:;'*1 0 N' P N>:C, n n p n [ * P 0 d (boson) d p P 0 p N, p;i1n*,o P n N*,o n;j5n*. p 0 d PN*'; iln*'o n p ~/ n n N n p p N*' P n 0 d (bosonjo d p j5 d (bosonjo d K K d {bosonjo d ' d (boson)o d K ii d d Y*. 17