Midterm II. ChE 142 April 11, (Closed Book and notes, two 8.5 x11 sheet of notes is allowed) Printed Name

Similar documents
CBE 142: Chemical Kinetics & Reaction Engineering

ChE 344 Winter 2013 Mid Term Exam II Tuesday, April 9, 2013

ChE 344 Winter 2011 Mid Term Exam I + Solution. Closed Book, Web, and Notes

Name. Honor Code: I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this examination, nor have I concealed any violations of the Honor Code.

ChE 344 Winter 2013 Final Exam + Solution. Open Course Textbook Only Closed everything else (i.e., Notes, In-Class Problems and Home Problems

ChE 344 Winter 2013 Mid Term Exam I Tuesday, February 26, Closed Book, Web, and Notes. Honor Code

ChE 344 Winter 2011 Final Exam + Solution. Open Book, Notes, and Web

ChE 344 Chemical Reaction Engineering Winter 1999 Final Exam. Open Book, Notes, CD ROM, Disk, and Web

Chemical Reaction Engineering. Lecture 2

To increase the concentration of product formed in a PFR, what should we do?

Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Engineering

Chemical reactors. H has thermal contribution, pressure contribution (often negligible) and reaction contribution ( source - like)

CE 329, Fall 2015 Second Mid-Term Exam

Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Midterm 1

5. Collection and Analysis of. Rate Data

Lecture 4. Mole balance: calculation of membrane reactors and unsteady state in tank reactors. Analysis of rate data

ChE 344 Winter 2011 Final Exam. Open Book, Notes, and Web

CHEMICAL REACTORS - PROBLEMS OF REACTOR ASSOCIATION 47-60

Problems Points (Max.) Points Received

PFR with inter stage cooling: Example 8.6, with some modifications

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Example 26.3

Chemical Reaction Engineering. Dr. Yahia Alhamed

CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING

Next, make a stoichiometric table for the flow system (see Table 3-4 in Fogler). This table applies to both a PFR and CSTR reactor.

Chemical Reaction Engineering. Lecture 7

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Unit 30.Thermal Back-Mixing in a PFR

Methane Oxidation Reactions

1. (25 points) C 6 H O 2 6CO 2 + 7H 2 O C 6 H O 2 6CO + 7H 2 O

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING KINETICS/REACTOR DESIGN. Tony Feric, Kathir Nalluswami, Manesha Ramanathan, Sejal Vispute, Varun Wadhwa

CHE 404 Chemical Reaction Engineering. Chapter 8 Steady-State Nonisothermal Reactor Design

Dr. Trent L. Silbaugh, Instructor Chemical Reaction Engineering Final Exam Study Guide

Review: Nonideal Flow in a CSTR

BITS-Pilani Dubai, International Academic City, Dubai Second Semester. Academic Year

Chemical Reaction Engineering

AAE COMBUSTION AND THERMOCHEMISTRY

Lecture 8. Mole balance: calculations of microreactors, membrane reactors and unsteady state in tank reactors

10.37 Exam 2 25 April, points. = 10 nm. The association rate constant

Chemical Reaction Engineering

MIDTERM EXAMINATION Chemical Engineering 140 Fall 2002 Professors Jay D. Keasling and Jeffrey A. Reimer. Your SID #:

1. Introductory Material

1/r plots: a brief reminder

CHE 404 Chemical Reaction Engineering. Chapter 8 Steady-State Nonisothermal Reactor Design

Chemical Reaction Engineering

Chemical Reaction Engineering

Thermodynamics revisited

PHEN 612 SPRING 2008 WEEK 1 LAURENT SIMON

Chemical Reaction Engineering - Part 14 - intro to CSTRs Richard K. Herz,

Chemical Engineering 140. Chemical Process Analysis C.J. Radke Tentative Schedule Fall 2013

BAE 820 Physical Principles of Environmental Systems

Lecture 8. Mole balance: calculations of microreactors, membrane reactors and unsteady state in tank reactors

COURSE 3.20: THERMODYNAMICS OF MATERIALS. FINAL EXAM, Dec 18, 2000

Example 8: CSTR with Multiple Solutions

NONISOTHERMAL OPERATION OF IDEAL REACTORS Plug Flow Reactor

13 th Aug Chemical Reaction Engineering CH3010. Home work problems

HW Help. How do you want to run the separation? Safety Issues? Ease of Processing

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering. Class 20 on Unit 19

Chemical Reaction Engineering

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Example 30.1

INTRODUCTION TO CHEMICAL PROCESS SIMULATORS

Investigation of adiabatic batch reactor

Figure Q3. Boundary conditions for a tubular reactor.

Exam 4 SCORE. MA 114 Exam 4 Spring Section and/or TA:

Process design decisions and project economics Dr. V. S. Moholkar Department of chemical engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

10A. EVALUATION OF REACTION RATE FORMS IN STIRRED TANK. Most of the problems associated with evaluation and determination of proper rate forms from

Solutions for Tutorial 4 Modelling of Non-Linear Systems

6. Multiple Reactions

b. Free energy changes provide a good indication of which reactions are favorable and fast, as well as those that are unfavorable and slow.

Web Solved Problems Web Example SP-8.1 Hydrodealkylation of Mesitylene in a PFR CH 3 H 2. m-xylene can also undergo hydrodealkylation to form toluene:

CHAPTER 2 CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION

Chem. 1B Midterm 1 Version A February 9, 2018

(1) This reaction mechanism includes several undesired side reactions that produce toluene and benzene:

ME 354 THERMODYNAMICS 2 MIDTERM EXAMINATION. Instructor: R. Culham. Name: Student ID Number: Instructions

14-2 Whether a reaction should proceed (thermodynamics) and how fast (kinetics) it should proceed.

The Material Balance for Chemical Reactors

The Material Balance for Chemical Reactors. Copyright c 2015 by Nob Hill Publishing, LLC

Chem. 1B Midterm 1 Version A February 3, 2017

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Example 29.3

Chemical Reaction Engineering

Chemical Reaction Engineering

How fast reactants turn into products. Usually measured in Molarity per second units. Kinetics

Problem: Calculate the entropy change that results from mixing 54.0 g of water at 280 K with 27.0 g of water at 360 K in a vessel whose walls are

Pre GATE Pre-GATE 2018

FUEL CELLS: INTRODUCTION

BAE 820 Physical Principles of Environmental Systems

Potential Concept Questions

Name: Discussion Section:

A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Example 14.3

4 th Edition Chapter 9

Physics 5D PRACTICE FINAL EXAM Fall 2013

Chem. 1B Midterm 1 Version B February 3, 2017

Exam 3, Ch 7, 19, 14 November 9, Points

Reaction rate. reaction rate describes change in concentration of reactants and products with time -> r = dc j

Theoretical Models of Chemical Processes

The Energy Balance for Chemical Reactors

The Energy Balance for Chemical Reactors

Work and heat. Expansion Work. Heat Transactions. Chapter 2 of Atkins: The First Law: Concepts. Sections of Atkins

Chemical Reaction Engineering

CE 329, Fall 2015 Assignment 16, Practice Exam

Lecture (9) Reactor Sizing. Figure (1). Information needed to predict what a reactor can do.

Plug flow Steady-state flow. Mixed flow

Transcription:

ChE 142 pril 11, 25 Midterm II (Closed Book and notes, two 8.5 x11 sheet of notes is allowed) Printed Name KEY By signing this sheet, you agree to adhere to the U.C. Berkeley Honor Code Signed Name_ KEY 1) 1 /1 2) 1 /1 3) 1 /1 4) 2 /2 5) 3 /3 Total: 8 /8

1. (1 Pts.) The rate law for the irreversible reaction B + C is known to be as follows: r = -k/c. In an experiment, the concentration of was monitored as a function of time in a constant volume BSTR. a) Which technique would you use to find the rate constant, k? (4 pts.) Integral method since the form of the rate law is known OR Differential method, though this method is less appropriate b) How would you find the value of k graphically? (6 pts.) dc k Integral method: we first integrate the rate law = => dt C C dc = k dt The boundary condition is C = C at t=. 1 2 1 2 1 2 Thus, C C o = kt. So we need to plot C vs. t in order to find k from the 2 2 2 slope (k = - slope).. dc Differential method: First, we would need to calculate, which can be dt calculated from a plot of C vs. t using an appropriate technique. Next, plot dc ln vs. ln(c ). The intercept would give us k (k=exp(intercept). dt 2. (1 Pts.) The irreversible gas-phase reaction of SO 2 to SO 3 is to be carried out in a PFR at a pressure of 1 atm. The inlet feed includes a 5-fold stoichiometric excess of O 2 to assure complete conversion of SO 2. The inlet flow rate is 5 m 3 /min and the temperature is 8K. SO 2 + ½ O 2 SO 3 a) You are given data on the partial pressure of product, p, along the length of the reactor. How would you plot this data to obtain the reaction order with respect to SO 2? Be specific as to exactly what you would plot and how you would plot it. (6 pts.) dx 1. Design equation: this is a PFR: F = rso2 (SO 2 is limiting reagent) dv α β 2. Rate law: propose a general rate expression: r SO2 = k' PSO2PO 2 However, O 2 is in large excess, so we can assume P O2 =P O2, α β Therefore, r = kp, where k = k P SO2 SO2 ' O2, 3. Stoichiometry: P SO2 = P (1-X); P = P *X

(This assumes that the volumetric flow rate is approx. constant, which is appropriate since oxygen is in such excess, i.e. the expansion factor, ε, is negligible 1 1 ( ε = y SO2δ = 1 1. 2 ). 1+ 25 2 Therefore, P SO2 = P - P and X = (P - P SO2 )/ P dp P SO α dp = where V=z* c dz F dz 2 c SO, 4. Combine: = 2 k ( P P ) dp dz 5. Plot: ln versus ln( P P ) based on the following equation: dp ln dz c P = ln F k + α ln ( P P ). The slope of the line will be the order of the reaction, α. ( dp can be found from a plot of P versus z ). dz b) How would you propose to determine the reaction order with respect to O 2? Would this require additional data, and if so, what data would be needed? (4 pts.) There are a numerous possibilities, including: 1) Method of excess using excess SO 2 ; need data for P versus L. 2) Stoichiometric feed and data for P versus L. 3) Ratio of initial rates with feeds having different values of P ; data for P versus L. 4) Method of non-linear least squares and data for P O2, P SO2 and/or P versus L. 3. (1 Pts) hydrogen stream to a fuel cell must be cleaned up of any CO, since CO will poison the catalyst. The removal of CO can be done with a catalyst that combusts CO selectively in the presence of H 2. The kinetics for the two reactions are given by: 1. CO + 1/2O 2 CO 2 r 1 = k 1 P O2 /P CO k 1 = k o 1 exp(-e 1 /RT) 2. H 2 + 1/2O 2 H 2 O r 2 = k 2 P O2 P H2 k 2 = k o 2 exp(-e 2 /RT) E 1 > E 2 a) What type of reactor should be used to maximize the combustion of CO relative to H 2? Please be sure to explain your answer. One should use a CSTR in order to maximize the combustion of CO relative to H 2. The reason is that the rate of CO Combustion is inversely dependent on CO partial pressure, whereas the combustion of H 2 is proportional to H 2 partial pressure.

b) Should the reactor of your choice be run at high or low temperature? Be sure to explain your answer. The reaction should be run at high T because E 1 > E 2 ; therefore, the rate of reaction 1 will increase more rapidly as T is increased 4. (2 Pts.) Consider a first-order gas-phase reaction occurring in a PFR. The reactor is jacketed so that heat can be added or removed through the walls of the reactor. The heat flux through the wall per unit volume of reactor is given by q = Ua(Ta-T). a) ssume the reaction is exothermic and reversible. On the same graph, sketch the temperature profile (T versus V) for the following two cases: 1) adiabatic operation, 2) non-adiabatic operation and T a < T o. Label T a and T o on your graph. T for adiabatic operation will start at To, increase for some distance into the reactor and then level off. For non-adiabatic operation (Ta < To), the T profile will increase initially, then as the reaction slows, heat removal begins to dominate and the temperature is shifted to lower temperatures. b) On a separate graph, sketch the optimal temperature profile to maximize the conversion. ssume the maximum operating temperature is T m. For part b, the reactor should initially be run at Tm, the maximum possible temperature, until the conversion reaches the "locus of maximum rates." The optimal temperature profile will then decrease along this locus.

5. (3 Pts.) The liquid phase reaction of J Z takes place in a superheated steam jacketed CSTR with pure J as the feed. n operator in charge of monitoring the reactor decides that everything is quiet and steps out to have a quick cup of coffee. While away, a loud explosion is heard coming from the direction of the CSTR. The operator runs back and finds that the CSTR has exploded. In the follow-up investigation, the reactor was found to have heated up to above the reactor design specifications. The shaken operator explained that the reactor was definitely operating below 37 K when she left. The last readings on operator s clipboard: Inlet feed temperature = 35K Temperature of the heated jacket = 355K Molar flowrate of feed = 1 mol/min Reactor Specifications: E/R = 2, K C pj = 5 cal/mol K C pz = 2 cal/mol K U = 45 cal/min K H rxn = -83, cal/mol K volumetric flowrate = 2 dm 3 /min G(T), R(T) G(T), R(T) versus T 8 75 G(T) 7 R(T) at explosion 65 R(T) standard operation 6 55 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 G(T) R(T) @ standard operation R(T) @ explosion 3 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5 Reactor Temperature (K)

a) pproximately what was the temperature of the reactor when the operator left for coffee? Use plot shown above. = U 45cal / min K κ ~ = Θ C F mol i pi J ( 5cal / mol K )*( 1 / min) ( 9*355K ) κta + T + 35K Tc = = = 35K 1+ κ 1+ 9 R T ic % pi T Tc cal mol K T K cal mol K T K ( ) = Θ ( 1+ κ )( ) = ( 5 / )( 1+ 9)( 35 ) = 5 / ( 35 ) = 9 T 35 K because problem statement said T < 37K when operator left. b) Could the reactor operate at another temperature(s) under the conditions when the operator left? If so, at what temperature(s)? Show work. Yes. Steady States at T 35 K, 375 K, & 469 K. See plot for intercept points of G(T) & R(T) c) Which temperature(s) are most likely to occur? (i.e., stable) Stable Steady States at T 35 K & 469 K. Unstable at T 375 K d) The investigators found that the control mechanism for the superheated steam jacket was jammed open and the final reactor temperature (assumed at steady state) before the CSTR exploded was 48K. What was the temperature of the heated jacket when the reactor exploded? Show calculation. Looking at graph: R(T=48K) = 5, Kappa and heat capacity are constant so then: ( ) ( )( )( ) ( ) 5, = R T = 5 cal / mol K 1+ 9 48K Tc = 5 cal / mol K 48K T Tc = 38K then: κta + T ( 9 * Ta ) + 35K 38K = Tc = = 1+ κ 1+ 9 Ta = 388.3 K e) What was the conversion right before the reaction exploded? G ( T ) = ( H )X Looking at plot: G(T) = 5,; therefore, X =.62 rxn c