STM: Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Similar documents
Scanning Probe Microscopy. Amanda MacMillan, Emmy Gebremichael, & John Shamblin Chem 243: Instrumental Analysis Dr. Robert Corn March 10, 2010

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

Ecole Franco-Roumaine : Magnétisme des systèmes nanoscopiques et structures hybrides - Brasov, Modern Analytical Microscopic Tools

3.1 Electron tunneling theory

Module 26: Atomic Force Microscopy. Lecture 40: Atomic Force Microscopy 3: Additional Modes of AFM

NIS: what can it be used for?

Instrumentation and Operation

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Lecture 4 Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM)

Atomic and molecular interactions. Scanning probe microscopy.

Basic Laboratory. Materials Science and Engineering. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy/Spectroscopy

Scanning Probe Microscopy

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Program Operacyjny Kapitał Ludzki SCANNING PROBE TECHNIQUES - INTRODUCTION

Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM)

2) Atom manipulation. Xe / Ni(110) Model: Experiment:

Atomic Force Microscopy imaging and beyond

Nitride HFETs applications: Conductance DLTS

Scanning Force Microscopy

Introduction to Scanning Probe Microscopy Zhe Fei

Lecture 12: Biomaterials Characterization in Aqueous Environments

AFM for Measuring Surface Topography and Forces

INTRODUCTION TO SCA\ \I\G TUNNELING MICROSCOPY

= 6 (1/ nm) So what is probability of finding electron tunneled into a barrier 3 ev high?

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Characterization of MEMS Devices

Intermittent-Contact Mode Force Microscopy & Electrostatic Force Microscopy (EFM)

Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

Control of Dynamics of SPM Probes for Non-destructive Defectoscopy

Sensors of Structure. debroglie. Wave-Particle duality. Bragg reflection. Electron Diffraction. Heisenberg Uncertantity Principle

Scanning Probe Microscopy. L. J. Heyderman

Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro"

MAGNETIC FORCE MICROSCOPY

The interpretation of STM images in light of Tersoff and Hamann tunneling model

Experimental methods in physics. Local probe microscopies I

Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM) F = µ o (m )H

Scanning Probe Microscopies (SPM)

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Part I

Outline Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM)

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Studies of the Ge(111) Surface

672 Advanced Solid State Physics. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES OR APPARATUS; APPLICATIONS OF SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES, e.g. SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY [SPM]

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 11: Scanning Probe Microscopy. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Optical imaging of metallic and semiconductor nanostructures at sub wavelength regime

PY5020 Nanoscience Scanning probe microscopy

Scanning tunneling microscopy

Techniken der Oberflächenphysik (Techniques of Surface Physics)

Andreas Liapis, Luke Bissell and Xinye Lou. December 20, Abstract

Contents. What is AFM? History Basic principles and devices Operating modes Application areas Advantages and disadvantages

Citation for published version (APA): Mendoza, S. M. (2007). Exploiting molecular machines on surfaces s.n.

Electron confinement in metallic nanostructures

And Manipulation by Scanning Probe Microscope

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

STM spectroscopy (STS)

Microscopy and Spectroscopy with Tunneling Electrons STM. Sfb Kolloquium 23rd October 2007

Characterization Tools

Advanced techniques Local probes, SNOM

Microscopie a stilo: principi ed esempi di applicazione

Principle of Magnetic Force Microscopy

Scanning Probe Microscopy. EMSE-515 F. Ernst

Optics and Spectroscopy

Quantum Condensed Matter Physics Lecture 12

Probing Molecular Electronics with Scanning Probe Microscopy

Nanoscale confinement of photon and electron

AFM Imaging In Liquids. W. Travis Johnson PhD Agilent Technologies Nanomeasurements Division

General concept and defining characteristics of AFM. Dina Kudasheva Advisor: Prof. Mary K. Cowman

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: theory and examples

High-resolution Magnetic Force Microscope

Spectroscopy at nanometer scale

(Scanning Probe Microscopy)

Energy transport in metal nanoparticle plasmon waveguides

Kavli Workshop for Journalists. June 13th, CNF Cleanroom Activities

SOLID STATE PHYSICS PHY F341. Dr. Manjuladevi.V Associate Professor Department of Physics BITS Pilani

Nanomaterials and their Optical Applications

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE NPTEL NPTEL ONLINE CERTIFICATION COURSE. Biomedical Nanotechnology. Lec-05 Characterisation of Nanoparticles

Scanning Force Microscopy II

tip of a current tip and the sample. Components: 3. Coarse sample-to-tip isolation system, and

CHARACTERIZATION of NANOMATERIALS KHP

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Scanning probe microscopy of graphene with a CO terminated tip

Lecture Note October 1, 2009 Nanostructure characterization techniques

Film Characterization Tutorial G.J. Mankey, 01/23/04. Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center

Chapter 2. Theoretical background. 2.1 Itinerant ferromagnets and antiferromagnets

Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM)

Measurement of hardness, surface potential, and charge distribution with dynamic contact mode electrostatic force microscope

bio-molecular studies Physical methods in Semmelweis University Osváth Szabolcs

Review. Surfaces of Biomaterials. Characterization. Surface sensitivity

Other SPM Techniques. Scanning Probe Microscopy HT10

Lecture 20 Optical Characterization 2

LIGHT CONTROLLED PHOTON TUNNELING. University of Maryland, College Park, MD Phone: , Fax: ,

Beetle UHV VT AFM / STM

CNPEM Laboratório de Ciência de Superfícies

From nanophysics research labs to cell phones. Dr. András Halbritter Department of Physics associate professor

Reducing dimension. Crystalline structures

Point mass approximation. Rigid beam mechanics. spring constant k N effective mass m e. Simple Harmonic Motion.. m e z = - k N z

Understanding the properties and behavior of groups of interacting atoms more than simple molecules

Chapter 12. Nanometrology. Oxford University Press All rights reserved.

Transcription:

STM: Scanning Tunneling Microscope Basic idea STM working principle

Schematic representation of the sample-tip tunnel barrier Assume tip and sample described by two infinite plate electrodes Φ t +Φ s = 2Φ Sample work function Φ s Φ t Energy diagram Wave function ψ s ψ t Plane wave Exponential decay Electron tunneling DOS 4 e 2 I = π f ( E, T)[1 f ( E + ev, T)] M δ( E E ev ) t s s t bias ts t s bias ts, occupied sample states unoccupied tip states tunneling matrix elements elastic tunneling DOS: Density of State

I = I I = 4π e t s s t ts, Electron tunneling [ f( E, T) f( E + ev, T)] M δ( E E ev ) t s bias ts t s bias 2 Moving to the continuous t deρ ( E), deρ ( E) t s s 4π e 2 I = [ f( EF+ ε) f( EF+ ev+ ε) ] ρs( EF+ ev+ ε) ρt( EF+ ε) M( ε) dε sample and tip DOS For small kt, f(e) step function ev 4π e 2 I = ρs( EF + ev + ε) ρt( EF + ε) M( ε) dε 0 2 4π e I = VρS( EF) ρt( EF) M 2 And for small V bias di dv 2 4π e = ρs( EF + ev ) ρt( EF) M 2 The tunneling current is a function of the tip and sample density of state close to the Fermi level

STM vertical resolution Assuming the electron wave functions for tip and sample described by plane waves, the quantum mechanics predicts an exponential decay in the vacuum gap following ( Φ ) 2m ev ψ ( z) = ψ ( 0 ) e κ z, κ = t t ( d z) ( ) = ψ ( 0) ψs z e κ s For small T and V 2 z I VρS( EF) ρt( EF) e κ N.B.: if the tip (sample) is an insulator -> ρ t (E F ) (ρ s (E F )) = 0 implying I = 0 The STM is useless in this case I Vρ ( E ) ρ ( E ) e S F T F 1.025 Φd Φ in [ev] d in [Å] Typically Φ = 5 ev Atomic step Δd = 2 Å Δ I 1.025 ΦΔd e I 1 100 Easy to measure ΔI/I = 0.1 -> Δd = Φ -0.5 ΔI/I = 0.05 Å

STM lateral resolution J. Tersoff and D.R. Hamann. Phys. Rev. B. 31, 805 (1985). Spherical apex tip ψ t r r κre ( ) 0 κ exp r r R κ r r ( κ 0 ) 0 M r Re r 1 ρ ψ δ EF 2 s ( E, r0) = s( r0) E Es V E = E ev s ts κ R ( ) κ ψ ( ) F 0 0 s ( ) Bardeen matrix element Local density of states For small kt, f(e) > step function; for small V > ρ = constant, one gets z IrV (, ) Rρ ( E) ρ ( r, E) Ve κ 2 2 0 t F s 0 F The tunneling current depends on the tip position (ρ s (r 0,E F )) respect to the surface Tersoff calculated a resolution function which is a Gaussian with an RMS width of L = R+ d 2κ atomic tip R = 2 Å d = 2-3 Å L ~ 1 Å Actually can be better depending on the tip wave function

Not for free Table-top STM 10 K 100 K >0.5 M Home made UHV 3 He cryo-stm UHV STM

N. Weiss, EPFL PhD thesis My STM (UHV)

After electro-erosion Tip preparation

1) Imaging and topography feedback Basic concepts of STM imaging. Tunneling current is exponentially dependent on distance between tip and sample (< 1 nm). As the tip is moved from x 1 to x 2, the current increases as the tip-to-sample distance decreases due to the change in sample height. The increase in current causes the control loop to move the tip away from the sample until the error signal is again zero. Recording the value of the tip height (z) as a function of position (x,y) allows the 3-dimensional topography to be reconstructed. Constant current image of a stepped Pt surface covered by 1 monolayer Ag (I = 2.7 na, V bias = 10 mv) P. Gambardella, EPFL PhD thesis (2000)

Å Å Å Å H. Brune PhD thesis

Warning!!! I Vρ ( E ) ρ ( E ) e S F T F 1.025 Φd Remember: the tunneling current is a measure of the Local Density of States (at the Fermi level) of tip and sample

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Technique enabling atomic-scale imaging of insulating surfaces. The tip is mounted on a cantilever and is brought into contact with the sample surface. The force on the cantilever is related to its deflection via Hooke s law: F = -kx, where k is the spring constant of the cantilever and x is the deflection. (1) Non-contact AFM Van der Waals attraction 10-100 Å tip-surface separation (2) Contact AFM e - -e - repulsion <5 Å tip-surface separation (3) Intermittent contact AFM (tapping mode AFM) 5-20 Å tip-surface separation

Optical detection The attractive or repulsive force between the tip and the sample causes a deflection of the cantilever towards or away from the sample. The deflection is measured by a laser beam directed at the back of the cantilever. As the cantilever deflects, the angle of the reflected beam changes, and the spot falls on a different part of the photodetector. The signals from the four quadrants of the detector are compared to calculate the deflection signal. Piezo motor for x,y mapping

(1) In contact mode: F(x) = -k x Hooke's Law Spring constant of cantilever is less than surface, cantilever bends. Typical atom-atom k ~ 10 N m -1, typical cantilever k 0.1-1 N m -1 Total force on sample 10-6 to 10-8 N If spring constant of cantilever is greater than surface, surface deformed. This mode can be used for very high resolution imaging, such as atomic resolution (3) In intermittent contact (tapping) mode: Similar to non-contact AFM using vibrating cantilever except at one extent tip "taps" into contact mode Useful for soft surfaces - less prone to external vibration/noise than non-contact Less destructive than contact AFM and can image rougher samples DNA acquired in tapping mode

(2) In non-contact mode: Very small force on surface (~ 10-12 N) - tip-surface distance 10-100 Å - best for soft or elastic surfaces - least contamination - least destructive - long tip life In non-contact mode the cantilever oscillates close to the sample surface, but without making contact with the surface : AC driven oscillating cantilever (100-1000 Hz frequency, 10-100 Å amplitude) - resonant frequency ν =1/(2 π) sqrt(k/m) - k varies with external force gradient (df(x)/dx) so frequency changes with external force - electronics adjust tip-surface distance to keep resonant frequency constant -> constant tip force Contact and non-contact show similar topography except for soft/deformable materials

Details of the non contact mode (NC-AFM) First, the tip is vibrated at its resonant frequency (ω 0 ) using a piezoelectric element while far from the surface (assuming no interaction). As the tip is moved towards the surface, the presence of a force gradient modifies the spring constant of the cantilever so that k eff = k F where k is the spring constant of the cantilever in the absence of a tip-sample interaction. The key point is that this modification of the spring constant will produce a shift of the resonant frequency of the cantilever given by: ω = = = ω k eff m k m 1 0 = F' 1 k F' k k F' m where ω is the new resonant frequency of the cantilever due to its interaction with the surface. In practice, the user first selects an operating resonant frequency, ω sp. As the tip moves towards the surface both the shift in resonance frequency and the damping of the cantilever s oscillation due to tip-surface interactions will produce a corresponding change in the amplitude of oscillation at ω sp. To generate a NC- AFM image the user chooses a set-point amplitude, A sp. As the tip is scanned across the surface the feedback loop controls the tip-sample separation so as to maintain the oscillation amplitude constant at A sp. A NC-AFM image therefore represents a map of a constant force gradient (defined by A sp ) due to the tipsample interaction.

The method in theory: The result in image: Contact mode topography (left) and non contact mode image (right) of a two-phase block copolymer.

Mechanical characteristics of the AFM cantilever SEM images Dimensions 5 μm

Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM) Topography Magnetism

Scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM) The diffraction limit of spatial resolution. It is not possible to spatially resolve details that are located closer together than approximately half the probing wavelength. For optical microscopy, typically operating at a wavelength of 500 nm (the visible spectrum ranges from 400 nm to 700 nm), the lateral resolution is thus limited to about 250 nm. Scanning Near-Field Optical Microscopy (SNOM), brings a small optical probe very close to the sample surface, in the region called "near-field (opposed to conventional microscopy which are far-field microscopes). Here, at distances smaller than the wavelength away from the surface, also those waves can be probed that do not propagate, but rather decay exponentially perpendicular to the surface. In this evanescent field the k-vectors parallel to the surface can be fairly large, corresponding to small lateral (spatial) dimensions. Broadly speaking, if the aperture-specimen separation is kept roughly less than half the diameter of the aperture, the source does not have the opportunity to diffract before it interacts with the sample and the resolution of the system is determined by the aperture diameter as oppose to the wavelength of light used. An image is built up by raster-scanning the aperture across the sample and recording the optical response of the specimen through a conventional far-field microscope objective Spatial resolution = 50 nm

SNOM is a technique based on the STM. In a SNOM experiment, a fiber tip is scanned in close proximity across a sample, and optical information like reflectivity, fluorescence, luminescence or polarization can be derived with subwavelength resolution. In addition, topographical information can usually be obtained, since a local interaction (e.g. the lateral force between tip and sample surface) is used for control of the tip-sample distance, in a similar way as in an atomic force microscope (AFM) A typical instrument consists illumination (laser, fiber coupler) and collection optics (objectives, filters, photomultipliers for moderate light levels or photon counters of very low intensities), fiber tip holder with shear force feedback (oscillator and lock-in amplifier), an approach scheme (mechanical or motorized), and a scanner (piezo tubes or stacks, it is often advantageous to scan the sample rather than the probe). Digital data acquisition and anti-vibration damping (optical tables, actively or passively dampened) completes the equipment. The microscope shown here sits on a conventional (inverted) light microscope, which allows to localize the sample with low resolution prior to SNOM operation.

SNOM ways of operation Most common today is the use of aperture probes for transmission microscopy, either in illumination (a) or in collection (b). However, many samples or substrates are opaque, so that working in reflection is necessary (c). The reflected light can be collected by optics close to the tip, or by the fiber probe itself, in which case often uncoated fiber tips are used (d). The probe tip acts as a scatterer of the evanescent field, leading to homogeneous waves which can be easily detected.. Of high interest is this arrangement with inverted light path, Tunnel Near-Field Optical Microscope (TNOM) or forbidden light near-field optical microscope. Light can be scattered from the evanescent field by other probe tips, such as a force microscope tip on a cantilever (e). In the Plasmon Near-Field microscope, surface plasmons are generated at the surface of a sample on a thin film metallic substrate, and scattered by a probe tip (f). See also FSB/IPMC/LPMV or FSB/IPMC/LPRX/LPFM