DESIGNING FOR DOWNDRAG ON UNCOATED AND BITUMEN COATED PILES

Similar documents
Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

PERFORMANCE OF BITUMINOUS COATS IN REDUCING NEGATIVE SKIN

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

Neutral Plane Method for Drag Force of Deep Foundations and the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications

The San Jacinto Monument Case History

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Axially Loaded Piles

Interpretation of Pile Integrity Test (PIT) Results

CPT Guide 5 th Edition. CPT Applications - Deep Foundations. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Dr. Peter K. Robertson Webinar # /2/2013

Finite Element Investigation of the Interaction between a Pile and a Soft Soil focussing on Negative Skin Friction

A presentation of UniPile software for calculation of Capacity, Drag Force, Downdrag, and Settlement for Piles and Piled Foundations

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

Clayey sand (SC)

NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Static and Seismic Design of Piles for Downdrag. Thursday, October 4, :00-3:30 PM ET

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

PILE SETUP LA-1 EXPERIENCE. Ching-Nien Tsai, P.E.

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Liquefaction Induced Negative Skin Friction from Blast-induced Liquefaction Tests with Auger-cast Piles

Results from long-term measurement in piles of drag force and downdrag

Assessment of Calculation Procedures for Piles in Clay based on Static Loading Tests Anders Hust Augustesen

STABILITY AND DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF PAD FOUNDATIONONS ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD

HKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May Shallow Foundations. Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

ADVANCED SOIL MECHANICS FINAL EXAM (TAKE HOME):DUE THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 6PM.

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

CHEN YUE. Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering

Associate Professor. Tel:

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

LRFD Calibration of Axially-Loaded Concrete Piles Driven into Louisiana Soils

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

In-class Exercise. Problem: Select load factors for the Strength I and Service I Limit States for the. Loading Diagram for Student Exercise

Negative Skin Friction on Large Pile Group New Wembley Stadium. Mei Cheong

Analysis of a single pile settlement

PILE LOAD TEST IN OLD ALLUVIUM

Collapsible Soils Definitions

3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS

LRFD Application in Driven Piles (Recent Development in Pavement & Geotech at LTRC)

Comparison of Static and Dynamic Pile Load Tests at Thi Vai International Port in Viet Nam

STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOR OF PILE GROUPS IN LIQUEFIED SOILS

User Guide for FB-Deep F.C. Townsend

Cubzac-les-Ponts Experimental Embankments on Soft Clay

Entrance exam Master Course

SOME OBSERVATIONS RELATED TO LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SILTY SOILS

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

Erratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)

Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil

Theory of Shear Strength

OP-13. PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN OF EMBANKMENT

Geotechnical Indications Of Eastern Bypass Area In Port Harcourt, Niger Delta

CHAPTER 7 ANALYSES OF THE AXIAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement

Additional Pile Design Considerations

Theory of Shear Strength

CE : CIVIL ENGINEERING

Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics

Maximum Envelope of Lateral Resistance through Dynamic Increasing Energy Test in Piles

Bored Sockets in weathered Basalt

Congreso Internacional de Fundaciones Profundas de Bolivia Santa Cruz, Bolivia, 12 al 15 de Mayo de 2015 Day 1: Software Demonstrations

Practical Algorithm for large diameter pile tip bearing capacity based on displacement control RUAN Xiang 1, a

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

INCREASE IN PILE CAPACITY WITH TIME IN MISSOURI RIVER ALLUVIUM

Appraisal of Soil Nailing Design

A Comparative Study on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations in Sand from N and /

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

Numerical Study of the Effect of Pile Driving on the Position of a Neutral Plane

Numerical modelling of tension piles

UPDATED 04 JUN 12. Memorandum

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

Pile Foundation Bearing Capacity Characteristics of Volcanic Ash in Hokkaido, Japan

Design Example 2.2. Pad foundation with inclined eccentric load on boulder clay

Lecture 7. Pile Analysis

Appendix J. Geological Investigation

Technical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method

Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications

KDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents

Seismic design of bridges

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

Understanding Dynamic Pile Testing and Driveability

Bored piles in clay and Codes of Practice. Malcolm Bolton

Soil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required

RAPID PLATE LOAD TESTS ON BEARING STRATUM OF A BUILDING FOUNDATION

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Sand Control Rock Failure

Residual Deformation Analyses to Demonstrate the Effect of Thin Steel Sheet Piles on Liquefaction-Induced Penetration Settlement of Wooden Houses

Bearing Capacity of Soils in Deep Foundations Course No. CE0148 PDH: 5

PDA Workshop: Stresses, Integrity, Energy and Capacity

FOUNDATIONS ON SHRINKING AND SWELLING SOILS (Prediction of Movement, Construction Issues)

Transcription:

DESIGNING FOR DOWNDRAG ON UNCOATED AND BITUMEN COATED PILES Jean-Louis BRIAUD, PhD, PE President of ISSMGE Professor and Holder of the Buchanan Chair Texas A&M University Piling and Deep Foundations Middle East 2010 1 February 2010

Content Outline 1. What is downdrag? 2. Predicting pile behavior subjected to downdrag 3. Design and selection of bitumen 4. Example problem 5. Full scale field test in New Orleans, LA, USA 6. Full scale field test in Edmonton, AL, Canada 7. Conclusions

What is downdrag?

When to Design for Downdrag

Design to Avoid these Three Conditions

Static Equilibrium Qmax Qt Fn Fp Qp

Finding the Depth of Neutral Point ω pile (NP) = ω soil (NP) ω soil (NP)= read on consolidation settlement profile (given) ω pile (NP) = ω point + ω elastic ω point = ω soil (@Z=L) +ω punch ω elastic = elastic compression from bottom to NP

Pile Point Behavior punch 4 2 (1 v ) QD p AE s ω punch ν Q p A D E s = Pile point movement = Poisson s ratio = Point resistance = Area of pile point = Diameter of pile point = Soil modulus For clays E s = 100 S u = E pmt For sands E s (kpa) = 800 N = 2 E pmt

Pile Point Behavior Q 1 elastic p p 2 F L Z AE ω elastic Q p F p L Z A E = Elastic compression of pile = Point resistance = Positive friction force = Depth of pile point = Location of NP = Area of pile point = Pile modulus

Maximum Friction FOR PILES IN CLAY (short term and long term) f max = S u f max = σ ov

Maximum Friction FOR PILES IN SAND f max = σ ov f max (kpa) = 5 (N) 0.7 N = SPT blow count

Maximum Point Resistance FOR PILES IN SANDS AND IN CLAYS Clay (short term) Clay (long term) q max = 9 S u q max = σ ov N q Sand (short & long term) q max (kpa) = 1000 (N) 0.5 Sand (short & long term) q max = σ ov N q q max (1 v ) 2 max 4 AEs D

Downdrag on Pile Groups

Downdrag on Pile Groups After Okabe, 1977

Reduction Factors for Downdrag in Pile Groups

PILENEG - Developed at Texas A&M University - Analyzes axially-loaded single piles under both positive and negative skin friction - Bitumen coated piles can also be analyzed with the program http://ceprofs.tamu.edu/briaud/pileneg/pileneg.zip

PILENEG Inputs - Top load on pile - Pile data (cross section area of the pile, pile perimeter, embedded pile length, pile modulus) - Soil data (profile of maximum friction, soil settlement profile, soil modulus and Poisson s ratio at point, ultimate bearing pressure at point)

PILENEG Outputs - Top load, top settlement, depth of bitumen coating, depth to neutral point, maximum load, maximum stress and pile point load

WHAT IS BITUMEN? A black viscous substance. The residue left at the end of the refining process of crude oil, made of high molecular weight hydrocarbons WHAT IS A PRIMER? A liquid made of half bitumen and half solvent to liquefy the bitumen for easy application and filling the holes. The layer left is largely the bitumen after drying.

Behavior of Bitumen Bitumen is a viscous material τ = η (dγ/dt)

τ = η (dγ/dt)

τ = η (dγ/dt) η decreases when dγ/dt increases dγ/dt x 10 leads to ~ η / 2 η decreases when T increases T x 2 leads to ~ η / 10 η much more sensitive to T than dγ/dt

Bitumen Selection τ = η (dγ/dt) SOIL Storing Driving Downdrag Particle penetration

Storage Criterion req( storage ) gtd h 2 ρ = Bitumen mass density g = Acceleration due to gravity t = Max anticipated storage period d = Bitumen coating thickness h = Allowable bitumen flow distance (usually taken as equal to d) Storage requires: η > η req(storage)

req( driving, air ) a a Driving Criterion vd ρ = Bitumen mass density v a = Velocity of bitumen in the air (taken as the velocity of the hammer at time of impact) d = Bitumen coating thickness h = Allowable bitumen flow distance (usually taken as equal to d) f max = Maximum friction t = Max anticipated storage period a h 2 req( driving, soil ) s max Driving in air requires: η > η req(driving, air) f h td Driving in soil requires: η > η req(driving, soil)

Downdrag Criterion req( downdrag ) d d τ bit = Allowable shear stress on bitumen (τ bit ~ 0.1 τ s,avg ) τ s,avg = Soil shear strength d = Bitumen coating thickness s = Settlement rate s 1, s 2 = Settlements of the ground surface at times t 1 and t 2, respectively (after placement of an embankment or other load) bit bit bit s s s2 s1 t t 2 1 Downdrag requires: η < η req(driving)

Particle Penetration Criterion ' H K ' OV FOR DRIVEN PILES: K = 1 FOR BORED PILES: K = K 0 = (1-sinΦ)OCR 0.5

Bitumen Design Criteria Summary

EXAMPLE: Find allowable top load for a top settlement < 14 mm 1) Pile Ult. Capacity Q u = (25x1.2x30) + 1000 Q u = 900 + 1000 = 1900 kn

EXAMPLE: 2) Assume a top load = 500 kn and find the maximum depth to NP 500 + X = 1000 + (900 - X) X = 700 kn or 23.3 m of friction ω NP(soil) = 35 mm (settlement profile) ω top = 35+(850*23300)/(0.09*2E7) = 46 mm (This is more than the allowable settlement)

EXAMPLE: 3) Assume a top load = 100 kn and NP = 29 m Q p = 100 + 870-30 = 940 kn ω p = 4.7 mm ω NP(pile) = 4.7 + (955*1000)/(0.09*2E7) = 5.2 mm ~ ω NP(soil) ω top = 5 + (535*29000)/(0.09*2E7) = 13.6 mm

EXAMPLE: 4) Use bitumen coating with shear strength = 2.5 kn/m 2 and try a top load of 500 kn (Assume NP = 29 m) ω NP(soil) = 5 mm Q p = 500 + 87 30 = 557 kn ω p = 2.8 mm ω top = 5 + (543.5*29)/(0.09*2E7)*(1000) = 13.8 mm

ω top = 46 mm ω top = 14 mm ω top = 14 mm with bitumen

Full Scale Field Test: Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFICATIONS Clean surfaces (free of dust and grease) Apply the primer (wait 24 hrs for drying) Apply the bitumen (10 mm thick) Storing (cold, hot) Handling in the field (pad eye, no strap) Drive the piles (splice, temperature)

Clean surfaces (free of dust and grease) Apply the primer (wait 24 hrs for drying)

Applying the bitumen (10 mm thick)

Applying the bitumen (10 mm thick)

APPLYING BITUMEN COATING OUTSIDE IN THE COLD BITUMEN BECOMES BRITTLE DUE TO COATING OUTDOORS

Handling in the field

Storing the coated piles In hot weather, store under cover away from direct sunlight In cold weather, wait until bitumen cools down before storing

Driving the piles (splice, temperature)

AVERAGE ANNUAL AIR TEMPERATURE = SOIL TEMPERATURE

General Observations 1. Downdrag does not reduce the ultimate capacity of a pile 2. Downdrag increases the load in the pile 3. Downdrag increases the settlement of a pile; downdrag is a case where settlement controls the pile design 4. Live loads should not be included in settlement calculations including downdrag

General Observations 6. Downdrag makes a pile come out of the ground 7. Bitumen reduces downdrag significantly (90%?) when properly chosen and properly applied 8. Bitumen is most easily applied when the air is colder than the soil (winter) but when the temperature is above freezing 9. Piles located on the inside of a pile group experience less downdrag than the perimeter piles

For more information On Downdrag Videotape on Bitumen Coating (email: briaud@tamu.edu) Briaud J.-L., Tucker L.M., 1998, Design guidelines for downdrag on uncoated and bitumen coated piles, NCHRP Report 393, National Academy of Sciences. https://ceprofs.tamu.edu/briaud/nchrp_downdrag.pdf

THANK YOU http://www.issmge.org/ http://ceprofs.civil.tamu.edu/briaud/

Full Scale Field Test: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Full Scale Field Test: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Full Scale Field Test: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

STEEL WOOD PPC

APPLYING PRIMER COATING WITH BITUMEN

Full Scale Field Test: Alberta, Edmonton, Canada