Satellite baseline determination with phase cycle slip fixing over long data gaps

Similar documents
Real-Time Estimation of GPS Satellite Clocks Based on Global NTRIP-Streams. André Hauschild

Application of Accelerometer Data in Precise Orbit Determination of GRACE -A and -B

Accelerometers for GNSS Orbit Determination

Radio occultation at GFZ Potsdam: Current status and future prospects

Hourly Updated Precise Orbit Products of Quad-constellation

Precise Orbit Determination and Radio Occultation Retrieval Processing at the UCAR CDAAC: Overview and Results

VELOX-CI: Advanced Application of GPS for Radio Occultation and Satellite Attitude Determination

EESC Geodesy with the Global Positioning System. Class 7: Relative Positioning using Carrier-Beat Phase

CODE's multi-gnss orbit and clock solution

Impact of the SRP model on CODE's 5- system orbit and clock solution for the MGEX

GPS cycle slips detection and repair through various signal combinations

Accuracy Assessment of SGP4 Orbit Information Conversion into Osculating Elements

SLR and the Gravity Field

The TerraSAR-X / TanDEM-X Formation Flight: Challenges to Flight Dynamics and First Results. Wessling, Germany,

Developments towards GNSS real-time service in GFZ

Table 5-1: POD Processing Overview

IGS-MGEX: QZSS Orbit and Clock Determination

Improvement of the CNES/CLS IDS Analysis Center solution for the contribution to the next ITRF

ESTIMATING THE RESIDUAL TROPOSPHERIC DELAY FOR AIRBORNE DIFFERENTIAL GPS POSITIONING (A SUMMARY)

PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION OF GPS SATELLITES FOR REAL TIME APPLICATIONS

Test Computations

Assessment of the International Terrestrial Reference System 2014 realizations by Precise Orbit Determination of SLR Satellites

The Ohio State University IGS LEO/GPS Pilot Project: Status and Future Plans

Co-location of VLBI with other techniques in space: a simulation study

Characteristics of GPS ZTD products. Jan Douša EUREF Analysis Centre Workshop

Atmospheric delay. X, Y, Z : satellite cartesian coordinates. Z : receiver cartesian coordinates. In the vacuum the signal speed c is constant

EPOS-RT: Software for Real-time GNSS Data Processing

SPACECRAFT NAVIGATION AND MISSION SIMULATION

INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR LEO

IGS-related multi-gnss activities at CODE

Geodesy Part of the ACES Mission: GALILEO on Board the International Space Station

Climate Monitoring with Radio Occultation Data

Preliminary study for the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect with the Galileo satellites

Processing of GPS radio occultation data from TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X: Current status & future plans

New satellite mission for improving the Terrestrial Reference Frame: means and impacts

We have processed RO data for climate research and for validation of weather data since 1995 as illustrated in Figure 1.

A. Barbu, J. Laurent-Varin, F. Perosanz, F. Mercier and J. Marty. AVENUE project. June, 20

Ionosphere influence on success rate of GPS ambiguity resolution in a satellite formation flying

Satellite Geodesy and Navigation Present and Future

Towards an improved ILRS TRF contribution

Carrier-phase Ambiguity Success Rates for Integrated GPS-Galileo Satellite Navigation

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

Results and Analyses of Debris Tracking from Mt Stromlo

Application of Satellite Laser Ranging for Long- Wavelength Gravity Field Determination

Real-time Clock Estimation for Precise Orbit Determination of LEO-Satellites

A new Solar Radiation Pressure Model for the GPS Satellites

SLR-based orbit determination and orbit prediction of space debris objects

Atmospheric Water Vapor Effect on GNSS Signals and InSAR Data

Assessing attitude error of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC satellites and its impact on orbit determination

Carrier Phase Integer Ambiguity Resolution Recent results and open issues

Improved GNSS-Based Precise Orbit Determination by using highly accurate clocks

QUINC2. Harvest MNPEAK MCDON4 MAZTLN HOLLAS

Tracking the Relative Motion of Four Space Payloads Launched from a Sub- Orbital NASA Rocket

EUMETSAT's possible contributions to the future radio occultation constellation. COSMIC Workshop 2009 Boulder, USA

This is an author-deposited version published in: Eprints ID: 16117

P. Cipollini, H. Snaith - A short course on Altimetry. Altimetry 2 - Data processing (from satellite height to sea surface height)

Operational Support by ESOC s GRAS Ground Support Network - Status and Outlook

Information in Radio Waves

FEASIBILITY OF DIRECTLY MEASURING SINGLE LINE-OF-SIGHT GPS SIGNAL DELAYS

A priori solar radiation pressure model for QZSS Michibiki satellite

ESA s supporting Activities Related to Mass Transport in the Earth System

The Potential of High Resolution Satellite Interferometry for Monitoring Enhanced Oil Recovery

DETERMINATION OF THE STATION COORDINATES FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF THE SATELLITE LASER RANGING DATA S.

ESA/ESOC Status. T. Springer, E. Schoenmann, W. Enderle. ESA/ESOC Navigation Support Office. ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use

Kinematic Orbit Determination of Low Earth Orbiting Satellites using GPS Observables

AIM RS: Radio Science Investigation with AIM

Simulation Results of Alternative Methods for Formation Separation Control

Using non-tidal atmospheric loading model in space geodetic data processing: Preliminary results of the IERS analysis campaign

The ACES Mission. Fundamental Physics Tests with Cold Atom Clocks in Space. L. Cacciapuoti European Space Agency

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14

IGS Reprocessing. and First Quality Assessment

ROCSAT-3 Constellation Mission

Bahnen und Schwere. Bahnen und Schwere. Adrian Jäggi. Astronomical Institute University of Bern

DGPS Kinematic Carrier Phase Signal Simulation Analysis for Precise Aircraft Velocity Determination

Nutation determination by means of GNSS

OPTIMAL TIME TRANSFER

Relative Orbital Elements: Theory and Applications

Remote Sensing I: Basics

GG S. Internal Vision of GGOS. Markus Rothacher. GFZ Potsdam

Latest improvements in CODE's IGS MGEX solution

Improvement of orbit determination for geostationary satellites with VLBI tracking

GNSS-specific local effects at the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell

Orbit Representation

AIMING AT A I-CM ORBIT FOR LOW EARTH ORBITERS: REDUCED-DYNAMIC AND KINEMATIC PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION

International Conference on Mechanics and Civil Engineering (ICMCE 2014)

TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF ICE FLOW ON HOFSJÖKULL, ICELAND, OBSERVED BY ERS SAR INTERFEROMETRY

A new Solar Radiation Pressure Model for the GPS Satellites

4.8 The Normal Force. Apparent Weight

Impact of Earth Radiation Pressure on LAGEOS Orbits and on the Global Scale

Precise Orbit Determination and prediction of the ISS in the frame of the ACES Mission

Goddard Space Flight Center

Earthquake distribution is not random: very narrow deforming zones (= plate boundaries) versus large areas with no earthquakes (= rigid plate

Advances in Geosciences

INTERNATIONAL SLR SERVICE

Combined forecast impact of GRACE-A and CHAMP GPS radio occultation bending angle profiles

Inventory & Evaluation of Space-based Instruments: Using OSCAR for space weather

Beate Klinger, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Saniya Behzadpour, Matthias Ellmer, Andreas Kvas and Norbert Zehentner

Multi-GNSS Opportunities and Challenges

The post launch assessment review confirmed the following previous assertions about the mission status:

ESTIMATION OF NUTATION TERMS USING GPS

Transcription:

Satellite baseline determination with phase cycle slip fixing over long data gaps Grzegorz Michalak and Rolf König

Overview The cycle slip fixing methode 3 solutions Float ambiguities Ambiguities fixed on double-difference level Cycle slip fixing Tests with 1 month of real GRACE A/B and TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X data Examples of performance of the method Validation statistics Number of ambiguities Carrier phase residuals Satellite Laser Ranging data with K-band range data (GRACE) Precise baseline (TSX/TDX) Conclusions

Carrier phase cycle slip fixing Classical approach: (Δ n1, Δ n 2 ): cycle slips on the 2 frequencies Δ n1 Δ n 2=ΔWL ( cycle slip in wide-lane phase combination ) λ 1 Δ n 1 λ 2 Δ n2 =Δ LI ( cycle slip in ionospheric phase combination )

Carrier phase cycle slip fixing Classical approach: (Δ n1, Δ n 2 ): cycle slips on the 2 frequencies Δ n1 Δ n 2=ΔWL ( cycle slip in wide-lane phase combination ) λ 1 Δ n 1 λ 2 Δ n2 =Δ LI ( cycle slip in ionospheric phase combination ) Approach using L3 ambiguities : second equation can be replaced by cf 1 Δ n1 cf 2 Δ n 2 2 2 f 1 f 2 Advantage: =Δ L3 ( cycle slip in L3 phase combination = difference between neighboring L3 ambiguities) no dependence on ionospheric delay, cycle slips over long data gaps can be fixed Requirement: L3 ambiguities estimated with 1-2 cm accuracy uncalibrated phase delays stable over the arc

GRACE mission Data 1 month (June 2008) GPS Level 1B data (clock offsets, phase ambiguities and cycle slips reduced to small values) Undifferenced GPS L3 ionsphere-free combination of code and carrier phase 1 day arcs, 10 s spacing Accelerometer, attitude data and phase center variation mask K-band ranging data (for validation) SLR data (for validation) Processig and Parametrization Dynamic orbits in a two-step approach (GPS constellation and clocks offsets fixed) Reference: 1 day GPS Post-processed Science Orbits and clocks, 30 s spacing (3D accuracy ~3-4 cm) used for the gravity field processing No cycle slip fixing in the preprocessing Initial state vectors Empirical periodic accelerations in transversal and normal directions (20/day) Accelerometer biases in R,T,N directions, 1/hour (75/day) K-band ranging bias (1, in few exceptions 2) L3 float ambiguities and epoch-wise LEO clock offsets

GRACE mission Cycle slip fixing performance Example: Day 2008/06/01 Wide-lane and L1 cycle slip distribution around nearest integer

GRACE mission Example: Day 2008/06/01 Iterative cycle slip fixing over data gaps Wide-lane and L1 cycle slip distribution around nearest integer NL fix limit: 0.15 cycle

GRACE mission Example: Day 2008/06/01 Iterative cycle slip fixing over data gaps Wide-lane and L1 cycle slip distribution around nearest integer NL fix limit: 0.15 cycle

GRACE mission Example: Day 2008/06/01 Iterative cycle slip fixing over data gaps Wide-lane and L1 cycle slip distribution around nearest integer NL fix limit: 0.15 cycle

GRACE mission 2008/06/01-2008/06/30 K-Band Range

GRACE mission 2008/06/01-2008/06/30 Number of ambiguities and unfixed cycle slips

GRACE mission 2008/06/01-2008/06/30 Carrier phase

GRACE mission 2008/06/01-2008/06/30 Satellite Laser Range

TerraSAR-X TanDEM-X mission Two radar satellites flying in a close formation with baseline of 800 m (05/2016) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) for precise topographic maps Radio occultations For SAR the baseline accuracy requirement : < 1 mm in radial and crosstrack Precise baseline generated by: - GFZ with EPOS and Bernese software - GSOC with GHOST software using reduced dynamic approach

TerraSAR-X TanDEM-X mission Data 1 month (May 2016), undifferenced GPS ionsphere-free combination of code and carrier phase 14 h arcs, 30 s spacing, arcs without maneuvers Attitude and phase center variation mask SLR data for validation Procesing and parametrization Reduced dynamic orbits in a two-step approach (GPS constellation and clocks offsets fixed) Reference: 1 day GPS Rapid Science Orbits and Clocks, 30 s spacing (3-5 cm accuracy) Processing standards and parametrization exactly the same as for precise baseline determination Some cycle slips fixed in the preprocessing Initial state vectors 1 scaling factor for the Solar Radiation Pressure model 6 min spaced empirical accelerations in RTN directions, modeled as polygon (429/arc) Ionospheric free L3 ambiguities (~300/arc) (float, fixed on double-difference level, CS over data gaps 13, 63, 83, 123 223, 323 min. iteratively fixed) Empirical accelerations tightly constrained to be the same for both satellites

TerraSAR-X TanDEM-X mission Example 1 : Day 2016/05/27 Iterative cycle slip fixing over data gaps Wide-lane and L1 cycle slip distribution around nearest integer NL fix limit: 0.15 cycle Problem: flat NL distribution

TerraSAR-X TanDEM-X mission Example 1 : Day 2016/05/27 Baseline difference to the GFZ s precise baseline Number of ambiguities: - initial: 588 - final: 89 ( 85% reduction) - unfixed CS: 30 Outliers eliminated

TerraSAR-X TanDEM-X mission Example 2 (good): Day 2016/05/12 Iterative cycle slip fixing over data gaps Wide-lane and L1 cycle slip distribution around nearest integer NL fix limit: 0.15 cycle Problem: flat NL distribution

TerraSAR-X TanDEM-X mission Example 2 (good): Day 2016/05/12 Baseline difference to the GFZ s precise baseline Number of ambiguities: - initial: 654 - final: 66 (90% reduction) - unfixed CS: 5

TerraSAR-X TanDEM-X mission Baseline determination summary for May, 2016 (30 arcs) Average values, differences to GFZ s precise baselines Phase RMS [cm] SLR RMS [cm] Radial STD [mm] Normal STD [mm] Transversal STD [mm] N amb Unfixed CS Float 0.43 3.13 4.40 2.41 8.43 625 - DD fix 0.46 3.08 0.38 0.33 0.77 625 - CS fix (Elim) 0.71 3.45 3.84 (2.13) 2.20 (1.71) 3.86 (2.63) 98 37 Solution (Elim) N amb Unfixed CS with 2.5 σ iterative outlier elimination number of ambiguities in the solution number of CS remained

Conclusions Cycle slip (CS) fixing for single station over long data gaps is possible Significant reduction of number of phase ambiguities (~90%) Baselines accuracy can reach the level of double-difference ambiguity fixing The absolute orbit accuracy improves if most CS fixed (GRACE SLR validation, simulation) Orbit errors of reference GPS constellation visible in phase residuals Reliable CS fixing requires NL CS distribution concentrated around integers Efficient CS fixing over small gaps up to 15 min (not possible with classical approach) GRACE WL and NL CS distribution concentrated around integers K-band range RMS 1.85 mm is close to 1.34 mm from DD ambiguity fixing solution SLR RMS improves from 2.49 cm (DD ambiguity fixing) to 2.20 cm Average number of ambiguities reduced from 864 to 70 (92%) with 11 CS unfixed on average TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X Flat NL CS distributions prevent from reliable CS fixing: problem with data (?), orbit modeling (?), needs further investigations With outlier elimination the baseline (1.7-2.6 mm) improves by 50-70% in comparison to the float solution An example of successful CS fixing (5 unfixed) shows baseline accuracy < 1 mm

Thank you for your attention!