(SPSS 11.0 for windows) א א :

Similar documents
One-Way ANOVA. Some examples of when ANOVA would be appropriate include:

THE PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE CONCEPT OF HELL AND HEAVEN IN THERAVADA BUDDHISM : A CASE STUDY OF DHAMMA PRACTITIONERS AT RACHASINGKHON TEMPLE

B8" : 7& ) &," :&,) E1

Chapter 9 - Correlation and Regression

Study Guide #3: OneWay ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)

Simple Linear Regression: One Qualitative IV

Independent Samples ANOVA

Two-Way ANOVA. Chapter 15

Variation of geospatial thinking in answering geography questions based on topographic maps

Ron Heck, Fall Week 3: Notes Building a Two-Level Model

Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Arts and Humanities Series Vol. (33) No. (3) 2011.

Research Design - - Topic 19 Multiple regression: Applications 2009 R.C. Gardner, Ph.D.

Multiple OLS Regression

Teenager Experience of Racial Socialization Grade 8/ Year 9 Fast Track Project Technical Report Melba Nicholson September 26, 2002

One-Way ANOVA Source Table J - 1 SS B / J - 1 MS B /MS W. Pairwise Post-Hoc Comparisons of Means

Introduction to Business Statistics QM 220 Chapter 12

Multiple Regression. More Hypothesis Testing. More Hypothesis Testing The big question: What we really want to know: What we actually know: We know:

Basic Business Statistics, 10/e

ANOVA continued. Chapter 10

Retrieve and Open the Data

Simple Linear Regression: One Quantitative IV

Review of Multiple Regression

Multiple t Tests. Introduction to Analysis of Variance. Experiments with More than 2 Conditions

Chapter 8. Inferences Based on a Two Samples Confidence Intervals and Tests of Hypothesis

!" #$% &' # " 78 5%, & 42 5 (#) ^2S _0< HM" 1FX 0 $#, = # $D2 6 6R 6 8 = 8U L! 7 2 $#, H< 7 85 K b a#

Identify the scale of measurement most appropriate for each of the following variables. (Use A = nominal, B = ordinal, C = interval, D = ratio.

NVLAP Proficiency Test Round 14 Results. Rolf Bergman CORM 16 May 2016

compare time needed for lexical recognition in healthy adults, patients with Wernicke s aphasia, patients with Broca s aphasia

WELCOME! Lecture 13 Thommy Perlinger

16.400/453J Human Factors Engineering. Design of Experiments II

ANOVA continued. Chapter 10

MANOVA is an extension of the univariate ANOVA as it involves more than one Dependent Variable (DV). The following are assumptions for using MANOVA:

Chapter 16: Correlation

Modeling Mediation: Causes, Markers, and Mechanisms

2011 Pearson Education, Inc

Analysis of Variance Inf. Stats. ANOVA ANalysis Of VAriance. Analysis of Variance Inf. Stats

An Analysis of College Algebra Exam Scores December 14, James D Jones Math Section 01

An Approximate Test for Homogeneity of Correlated Correlation Coefficients

ANOVA continued. Chapter 11

Two-Sample Inferential Statistics

Using SPSS for One Way Analysis of Variance

Fuzzy Matrix Theory and its Application for Recognizing the Qualities of Effective Teacher

PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING LOCALLY AVAILABLE EQUIPMENT FOR TEACHING CHEMISTRY IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS OF NORTH SHEWA ZONE IN AMHARA REGION

DIATHEMATIKON PROGRAMMA CROSS-THEMATIC CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK

Multiple Comparisons

W E M E A S U R E H U M A N T H O U G H T

T.I.H.E. IT 233 Statistics and Probability: Sem. 1: 2013 ESTIMATION AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING OF TWO POPULATIONS

Mark Scheme (Results) Summer Pearson Edexcel International A Level In Mechanics (WME01) Paper 1

Mark Scheme (Results) Summer Pearson Edexcel GCE in Statistics 3 (6691/01)

CHAPTER 17 CHI-SQUARE AND OTHER NONPARAMETRIC TESTS FROM: PAGANO, R. R. (2007)

THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY HIGHER CERTIFICATE

Model Estimation Example

Adlai E. Stevenson High School Course Description

In a one-way ANOVA, the total sums of squares among observations is partitioned into two components: Sums of squares represent:

PSYC 331 STATISTICS FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS

Spatial Skills and Success in Engineering Education: A Case for Investigating Etiological Underpinnings

Using Possibilities to Compare the Intelligence of Student Groups in the van Hiele Level Theory

T-Test QUESTION T-TEST GROUPS = sex(1 2) /MISSING = ANALYSIS /VARIABLES = quiz1 quiz2 quiz3 quiz4 quiz5 final total /CRITERIA = CI(.95).

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE. An abridged version of the Cochrane review of exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome

Teaching Linear Algebra, Analytic Geometry and Basic Vector Calculus with Mathematica at Riga Technical University

The Common Factor Model. Measurement Methods Lecture 15 Chapter 9

Taguchi Method and Robust Design: Tutorial and Guideline

Inverse-variance Weighted Average

MSP Research Note. RDQ Reliability, Validity and Norms

Elem Reading I Methods. Elem Writing Methods. Elem SS Methods. Elem Reading II Methods

Model Based Statistics in Biology. Part V. The Generalized Linear Model. Chapter 16 Introduction

Prayer. Volume III, Issue 17 January 11, Martin Luther King Jr. Prayer. Assumption Catholic School 1

PLSC PRACTICE TEST ONE

UNIT 4 RANK CORRELATION (Rho AND KENDALL RANK CORRELATION

Assoc.Prof.Dr. Wolfgang Feilmayr Multivariate Methods in Regional Science: Regression and Correlation Analysis REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Estimating Multilevel Linear Models as Structural Equation Models

( PART : B DESCRIPTIVE )

Parametric versus Nonparametric Statistics-when to use them and which is more powerful? Dr Mahmoud Alhussami

STAT 3900/4950 MIDTERM TWO Name: Spring, 2015 (print: first last ) Covered topics: Two-way ANOVA, ANCOVA, SLR, MLR and correlation analysis

Grade 6 Social Studies

What Does the F-Ratio Tell Us?

The One-Way Independent-Samples ANOVA. (For Between-Subjects Designs)

Sampling distribution of t. 2. Sampling distribution of t. 3. Example: Gas mileage investigation. II. Inferential Statistics (8) t =

Chapter 14 Repeated-Measures Designs

Basics on t-tests Independent Sample t-tests Single-Sample t-tests Summary of t-tests Multiple Tests, Effect Size Proportions. Statistiek I.

5:1LEC - BETWEEN-S FACTORIAL ANOVA

A. Motivation To motivate the analysis of variance framework, we consider the following example.

Introduction to Statistical Analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics (v24)

Hypothesis Tests and Estimation for Population Variances. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

Statistical and psychometric methods for measurement: G Theory, DIF, & Linking

THE FISCHER-CLIFFORD MATRICES OF AN EXTENSION GROUP OF THE FORM 2 7 :(2 5 :S 6 ) Communicated by Jamshid Moori. 1. Introduction

Rodless cylinders Series 1600

ESP 178 Applied Research Methods. 2/23: Quantitative Analysis

Statistics 5100 Spring 2018 Exam 1

Calculating Fobt for all possible combinations of variances for each sample Calculating the probability of (F) for each different value of Fobt

EDF 7405 Advanced Quantitative Methods in Educational Research. Data are available on IQ of the child and seven potential predictors.

McGill University. Faculty of Science MATH 204 PRINCIPLES OF STATISTICS II. Final Examination

Chapter 12. ANalysis Of VAriance. Lecture 1 Sections:

Student Attitudes towards Chemistry: an Examination of Choices and Preferences

Lecture on Null Hypothesis Testing & Temporal Correlation

Introducing Generalized Linear Models: Logistic Regression

Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience 2e

Mean Comparisons PLANNED F TESTS

Ch. 16: Correlation and Regression

Introduction to the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Computing One-Way Independent Measures (Between Subjects) ANOVAs

Transcription:

א : א א א א א א ( ) א מ א א : /. جوان 2007 1

2

................ : 3

:....... : 4

א Metacognition. ( ) Achievement Motive : : א ) ( ): ( ) ( : : א توجد علاقة ارتباط موجبة ودالة إحصاي يا بين الوعي بالعمليات المعرفية ودافع الا نجاز الدراسي. درجة الوعي بالعمليات المعرفية ودرجة دافع الا نج از الدراس ي.(4 1 ) ( ) ( ) (2 (1 : א א. : 763 א :.( 421 342) ( 343 420) ( 201 562) (SPSS 11.0 for windows) א א : Crosstabs Pearson Correlation :. Analysis of variance ANOVA One Way (0,74) : : א. (0,01).. (4 1 ).1 : א : (1.. (2 (3.. (4 (5. 5

Abstract This study investigated the relationship between metacognition (processes) and school achievement motive in teacher training students in Algiers. Research problem: This can be summarized in the three following questions: 1) Is there any correlation relationship between metacognition (processes) and school achievement motive scores? 2) Are there any statistically significant differences between students according to sex, stream (Art, science) and level of studies (first and fourth years) in metacognition and school achievement motive scores? Research hypotheses: This research aimed at testing the following hypotheses: 1 There is a positive and statistically significant correlation relationship between metacognition and school achievement motive. 2 There are no statistically significant differences in metacognition and school achievement motive scores between the students groups studied. Research Instrument: Two tests were deviced for this purpose: The first was devoted to metacognition processes and the second to school achievement motive. Both tests were subjected to psychometric analysis to test for validity and reliability. Research Sample: It consisted of 763 teacher training students split as follows: (562 females and 201 males) (420 students of science stream and 343 of art stream) (342 first year and 421 fourth year students). Statistical analysis: Pearson correlation, crosstabs, One Way Analysis of variance (ANOVA). were performed on basis of SPSS 11.0 for Windows. Results: Research results reported a coefficient of correlation of (0.74) between metacognition and school achievement motive scores, which is statistically significant at (0.01) of significance. - There are differences between males and females in both of metacognition and school achievement motive scores to the advantage of females. - There are differences between science and Art streams an the two variables scores to the advantage of Art stream students. - There are differences between first and fourth year students on both variables in favour of first year students. Recommendations: The research came up with the following recommendations: 1) Building of training programs aiming at developing metacognition processes and school achievement motive for different school levels. 2) Design standardised tests for measuring m metacognition and school achievement motive. 3) Carry out experimental studies for measuring the effects of the training programs for metacognition and school achievement motive. 4) Reformation of school programs so that they contribute to the development of metacognition. 5) Train teachers on teaching skills based on metacognition and school achievement motive application. 6

(01) א....... א א : (07) (15) (15) (17) (17) (18) (20) (34) (36) (37) (38) (38) (40) (41)........................ א א : : : : : : : : :.................. : (1 : (2 : (3 : (4 :Gestalt Theory : : 7

(42) (43) (44) (45) (46) (47) (47) (49) (50) (51) (53) (54) (55) (56) (56) (58) (58) (59) (60) (60) (61) (62) (62).................. : : : :Field theory...... : : : : :...:( Ausubel, ) : :............... : : : : : ( Bruner, J.S ) : :........................: : : : : : : : ( Rotter, J.B )... : (63)...: (65) (66)...... : : : 8

(67) (67) (68) (69) (72) (72) (72) (74) (78) (80) (82) (82) (83) (85) (88) (90) (90) (91) (92) (93) (94) (95)... : ( Bandura, A.................. ) : : : : : :Information processing : :......... Metacognition : : : א א :.............................. : : : : Metacognition : : : : Metacognitive skills : : :...... : : K W L H technique (1 (96) : Activating prior Knowledge Strategy. (2 (97) (99) (100) (103)... : Self - Questioning Strategy. (3......... : P.S. Q. 5 R Strategy (4 :Thinking Aloud Strategy (5 :Brain Storming (6 9

: (106)... : Normal Learning cycle : ( ) : (108).:Metacognitive Learning cycle : : (110) (110) (111) (112)...... :...... : : : א א א : (114) (120)...... : : (122)... : (130) (134) (137) (139)............ א א : : : : : (142)... : : (161)... : : (177) (187) (191) (193) (193) (194) (196) (196)... : : :...... א א : : :............... : : : : : : 10

(200) (200) (201) (204) (206) (206) (208) (208) (209)..................... : : : : : : : : :...... : : : : : א א : (212)...: : (241)...: : (243)...: : (256)...: (263)...: (257)...: (260) א א :... א א מ (1). א מ (2) א מ (3). א מ (4) א מ (5) א מ (6) א מ (7) SPSS 11

א מ (8) SPSS 12

א א א : (73)... (74) (89) (94) (107) (108) (108) (111)......... (01) (02) ( 03) (04)............ (05) (06) (07) (08) (224).. (09) : (110)... ( 01) (193). (02) (195)... ( 03 ) (197)... ( 04 ) (198)... (05) (199)... (06) (199)... (07) (201) (202)...... (08) (09) (203)... (10) (203)... (11) (205)... (12) (207) (13) (208) (209) (210) (213)............ (14) (15) (16) (Pearson Correlation): : (17) (213).. ( ) ( ) : (18) (214)... (19) (214)... ( ) ( ) : (20) (215)... (21) 13

(216).( ) ( ) (22) (216)... (23) (217) (217)... ( ) ( ) (24)... ( 25) (218) ( ) ( ) 4 1 (26) (219) (219)...... (27) ( ) ( ) 4 1 (28) (220)... ( 29) (221)... (30) (222)... (31) (223)... (32) (225)... (33) (226)... (34) (227)... (35) (228)... (36) (229)... (37) (230)... (38)... (39) (231) (232)... (40) (233)... (41) (234)... (42)... (43) (235) (236)...... (44) (45) (237) 14

.. 1 (2000 ) (1995 ) 14 (1998 ) 15

Cognition Metacognition 19 (1999 )» : Metacognition " ". Metacognition» : «(1998 ) 168 83 (1997 ) 36 (1998 ). 1987 ) (Flavell, J.H 1976 ) (Schoenfeld, A.H 16

42 (Oxford, R.I 1996 ). 33 (2006 ) 27 (Paris, S & Winograd, P1990 ) : :... (Flavell, J.H 1976 )» «(250 / 1998 ) 20 (Prins, F 2002 ) :.... 17

(Zemmerman, B 1989 ) :. (Wong,B 1986 ) ) (.. 34 (2006 ). ( ) (2005 ). ( ) ( ). (2005 )» : 171 (1988 ) 86 (1992, ) «!, : 18

): ( : א א :. א א :... א א :... א א א :... א א :. א א :. א א :. 19

......... 20

: (Metacognition). (1997 ) (1997 ) (2000 ) (Paris,S.G & Wrinogard,P 1990) (Borkowski et al 1990) (Bondy,E1984Costa,A.L 1984) «thinking about thinking» : ] :.. [.. 2004 2001 ] 2002 1995 1992 1993 2000 2002 2001 2004 1999 2003 Wang,J1989/Gordon,J1996/Lan,W.Y1996/HollingWorth,R&McLoughlin,C2000/Alexand er,j.m&carr,m.s.p 1995/ Hacker,D.J1998/O Shea,L & Ohea,D1994/ Chamot,A 1988a ] : Metacognition (. :... 21

... ( ). : [... Deney,J Hull,C.L Thorndike,E.L ] (Reflection action) : ( ) (Glover, J and Ronning, R, 1987) Lewin,K Gestalt ]: Bandura,A Rotter,J.B Bruner,G.S Ausubel,D.P [.... Flavell,J Vygotsky,L (Flavell,J 1976 ).. : ( ) (1. (2 (Flavell, J, 1985) (3 22

.... ). 15 (2002 (Taylor,S 1999) (Gustone, R 1993) (Beeth, M.E 1998) (Fisher, R 1998) (Glaser, R 1990). (Baker, D &.(Bass, K & Duke, M 1994) Piburn, M 1997) : (Lindstrom, C 1995). : (Veenman, M.V & Elshout, J.J & Meiger, J 1997). 23

(Thomas, A 1993) 189 (1999 )..(Plantevin,Y 1997).(Baker,L and Browen,A 1984) (1997 ). ] : 1989 ) [ (Wang, J Metacognition Thinking Lowd. 24

( Alshamag,Q 1998, Wilson,J.M 1999 1999 1996 ) (2001 ). ) : (. (1. (2 (3 (2001 ) «thinking about thinking» (Omally,P et Al, 1976) 404 ( 2000 ). لدى الطال ب. 171 (1988 ) 25

1992 87,86 (1992 )!, /Parrish,J.&Rethlingshater,D.A1954 ] /Weiss et al 1959 /Burgess,L.1957 /McClelland,D.C1955.[Vhlinger,C.A & Stephens, M.W1960 (Entwistle,N 1981). " " McClleland,D.C :.. Atkinson,J.W Moslov,M Muray,H 89 (1977 )... : (McClleland,D.C ) ( the achieving society 1961 ) ]: 26

[.....266 (1988 ). (Sydney) (Macquarie University) (1988) (1990 )...(McCombs,P1994) 27

(Nathawat, Singh and Singh, 1997). (1999 ) ) (.. 117 (1979 ). ) : (Nolen & Nicholls,1993) (.. ( ) (1981 ). 28

: : (1 ( 1)( ) (2 ( ) (3 (4 (5 (6 : א א : ) ( /( ) /( ) : ( ) ( א א : 1 29

2001 ] : 2002 1995 1999 1996 2005 2003 2004 2004 2002 / 2003 2003 / 2005 / 2005 / 2006 / 2005 / 2006 / 2002 / 2000 / 1996 / 2004 / 2001 Gordon, J, 1996 / / 2003 / 2000 O'Shea, L et al, 1994 / Chamot, A, 1988 / Alescander, J.M et al, 1995 / Browen, A.L, 1980 / Flavell, J, 1976, 1979 / Wang, J, 1989 / Harris, D.M, 1998 / Paris, S.G et al, 1990 / Borkowski, J.G, 1987, 1992 / Osman, M.E, and Hannafi, M.G, 1992 / Barell, J, 1991 / Rikey, D et al, 2000 / Hanly, G, 1995 / Koch, A, 2000 / Schoenfeld, A.H, 1992 / Horak, W.J, 1992 / Ashman, A.F et al, 1994 / Nolan, M.B, 2000. ) : (Otero, J et al, 1992 / Shia, R.M, 1979 /2003» 2001 760 «(2001 1970). ) ( 30

. : : א א (1.. ( / : ) ( / : ) (2 (3.( / : ) א א :.( ) א א :. א א :. א א :. א א א : :. 31

:. א א : ( ). ( ) 2006. א א : א א : : א : (1 ( ) : ( ).. : (2.. ( ) ( ( :. : : ( ) ( ) (3 (4. 32

א א 1964 ( ) : 1964 24 134/64 2000/1999 ( ) 13 1999 14 : ( + ) (1 ( + ) (2 :.. ( ) : 1984 18 206 / 84.1992 1991 ) : (.( 5 + ) ( 4 + ). 33

א א א א מ א מ... Metacognition (1. Cognitive learning (2.Motivation (3. Achievement motive (4. Academic Achievement motive (5 :Metacognition א א מ (I Metacognition.. :.(..2003 1991 ) : ) Metacognition» : (1971 (Flavell,1979) (Flavell, J.H & Wellman, H.M, 1977 Flavell, J.H «.. )» : Cognition (Hallahan, D.P & Kauffman, J.M, 1992 176 ( ) «about cognition )» : 166 (2004 ).«34

: (Paris, S & Cross, P 1983 )».«Strategic thinking» : (Vickil,C2005 ) (Vickl, C, 1998, P 32). : (2002 ) ).«51 (2002» : (2000 ) (Awareness) 186 (2000 ). : (2001 )» : 06 (2001 ).«: (Hacker,D.J 1998 )» :.«35

» : 105 (2000 ).«: Meta perception. Meta Understanding. Meta memory. : (Garner, R, 1988) Metacognition ) (Metacognition :. (1...( ) ( ) ( ) (2 ".. (3. "» : (4. «Metacognition : " " " " ( ) 52 (2002 ).. 36

(Sternberg,R.J 1985, 1988 ) (3 (2 (1 : : : :Planning (1..... : : Monitoring and Controlling (2....... : :Assessment (3.... 57 56 (2002 ) (Borkowski,J et al, 1990. ) 37

: (Borkowski,J et al, 1990, p 115). (Brown, A.L, 1989) (Barell, J, 1991)... 323 (2002 ). " : א מ א מ (II " 8 (2000 ).» : ).«8 (2000 :... 38

... (Bransford, J and Stein, B, 1984 ) : " :Motivation א א א א מ (III ). (.. 211 (2000 ).(.. ) ) (Motive ) (Motivation (Atkinson, J. W, 1964) ( ). 419 (1990 (2003 ) 39

201 ( ).»: (1996 ) (1996 ) «452 : : (1 ) Psychoanalysis : :. " 75 (1998 " 177 (1999 ). : (2 ( ) ( ) ) (1998 ). : p519. Biehler, R and Snoman, J 1990 : (3 ( 40

235 (1998 ). (Buring, S et al, 1995) :.. ( Biehler, R and Snoman, J 1990 ) p520. : (Weiner, B, 1979 1980 ). : (4 " " ( ) ). 220 (2004 : 172 (1999 ). 41

6 ( /1988 ) (Weinberger, J, and Mc Clleland, D.C, 1990). : א א : (Mc Clleland, D.C & Atkinson, J.W 1976 ). א א :. ( ) (1995 ). 64 61 : Achievement motive : א א מ (IV : " " " ". " ".» ( Adler,A.1917 ) : «42

165 (Hall,C.S & Lindzey,G 1969 )» (Lewin, K 1944 ) ) 13 (1990 ) «Aspiration Need» (Murray,H.A1938 «Achievement Explorations in Personality )»: 78 (1995 «( ) 1965 ) ( ) (Atkinson, J.W»: :.45 (1979 ) «(Murray, H ) :.... ). ( ) 79 (1995 (Mc Clelland et al, 1976 )» : : 43

80 (1995 ).«325 (Atkinson, J.W,& Raynor,J.O 1978 ) ( ). ( ) (Atkinson, J.W, 1964 ) :. (1. (2 96 ( ). (3» : (1987 ) ) «5 (1987» : (Heckausen, H 1976 ).«: ( ) (1. ( ) (2. ( ) (3 ). 44

23 ( ( )1989 ) 135 (1986 " "... : )(1979 (Hermans,H.J.M 1970 )(Murray,H.A 1938 ) 166 165 (1988 ) (1986 ) (1983 :...... 92 (1996 ).. ) (Murray, H, 1938 ) (Atkinson, J.W, et al 1978 ) (Mc Clelland et al, 1953 (Mitchell,D 1961 ) ) (1983 ) (Jackson,D et al 1976 )..(1993 (.. ). : (1993 )» 45

.«:Academic Achievement motive א א א א מ (V :.. ). 360 (1995» : (2002 ).«179 (2002 ).» : «) 256 (2004 ). :» : ( Mc Clelland,et al1953 ) 46

.«( ) (1977 ) : א א : : :.. א א : : : (1995 ). 47

» א א א מ א א א : : :Metacognition (1.. ( )».«: :Cognitive learning (2 )...«:Motivation ( (... ) (3.. :Achievement motive (4..... :Academic Achievement motive (5.. 48

Gestalt Theory Field theory : : ( Ausubel, D.P ) : : ( Bruner, J.S ) : : ( Rotter, J.B ) : ( Bandura, A ) : Information processing : Mnemonics Strategies 49

: مفهوم التعلم المعرفي: (I ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) :».. 353 (2001 ). «(.. ) 190 (1994 ).. 190 (1994 ) ) 1994 ص) 203. 50

(Bransfrod,J.D & Stein,B.S 1984 ) : (1 (2 (3 65 (Block,J1981 ) (4 ) : (. :Structural Approach (1 : Information Processing 354 (2001 ) (2. : خصاي ص العمليات المعرفية (II : : (1. : (2... 51

(3 (Affirmative) : (Negative)..... : (4 :.... : 398 (1995 ),D.p 1968 ) : التعلم المعرفي والبنية المعرفية (III (Ausubel. 250 ( Keil,F.C 1984 ). Cognitive Strategies : التعلم المعرفي والاستراتيجيات المعرفية (IV ) 325 (1995 52

: (1996 ). 325 (1995 ). 325 (1995 ). :.275 (Gagne,E.D1985 )... 53

:... 209 (1995 ) א מ א. GESTALT THEORY א : ( ) : (1969 1887)( Kohler, W.L ) (1943 1880)( Werthemer, M ) (1941 1886)( Koffka, K ) ) " " ( ) 347 (1993 : : א א א (1. ( ).. ). (1996 : א א (2 :.. 54

. :. :.. : א א א א (3 ) (1996 ) Rationalists... (1983 א מ א א א : : ) : :Gestalt (1 (.. :. :Insight (2». «55

» :Meaning (3.«: Cognitive Equilibrium or cognitive consistency (4,. :Perceptual reorganization (5 ( Gazada, M.G,& Covsini,R.J 1980 ). : מ א : (1. (2. (3. (4 (1996 ). : א א : 56

: (1 :. : :Figure :Ground 1 2.. direction :Principle of continuity Good continuation.. :principle of proximity (2 (3. :Principle of inclusiveness (4...... :Principle of Similarity (5. : Principle of Enclosure (6.. ( ) : א מ א : : (1. 57

: (2. : (3. : ( ) (4. : (5. א מ א ( ) (... ) : : (1... :. 58

: (2 ) (. : (3 ( ). : (4. (5... Field theory א : : Whold Situation. (1947 1890) (Lewin, K ). ) : ( ) ( (Johnson, D.W & Johnson, R.T, 1997 ). 59

المفاهيم والمصطلحات المستخدمة في نظرية المجال: ( ). :Life Space (1 :........ : ( Lewin ). 234 :Life Space topology (1967 ) (2 :.. : : B = F ( P x E ). P. E. B. F... 60

:Positive Valence (3. :Negative Valence (4.... أهم الفرضيات التي تقوم عليها نظرية المجال: (Field of forces) :.(Psychological field) (define it) (change it) (move it).(substance) (stability) : : (External forces) (Internal forces). التعلم حسب نظرية المجال: " " :.... : :. ( Lewin ) 61

: :. :.. : : : ( Lewin ).. Level of aspiration conflict. ( ) א א : ( : :( ) (1. :( ) (2. :( ) (3.... :Level of aspiration א ( 62

» : (Nicolls, J.G, 1979 ).«:.( ) (1.( ) (2. (3. (4. : :. א ( Lewin ).. 63

:.... ) (........ ) (1967 ) (1996 ). (2001 א מ א א א מ א : (Ausubel, D.P ) : ) : (... 1918) (Ausubel, D.P.. (Ausubel,D.P 1978 ), :... 64

:(Ausubel,D.P 1978 (1988 ). العوامل المساعدة على التعلم وفق نظرية ) ( ) : : (1.. (Ausubel et Al, 1978 ) P 59. : (2..(1996 ). : (3. א מ א ) (Ausubel, D.P : : (1 ) Hilgard,E.R & ).( (Brower,G.H,1975 : " " 65

(1984 ). (Ausubel, D.P 1978 ) :... : : (. : (. : (. ( Ausubel et Al, 1978 ) P 60-61. : (2 : :Combinatorial Learning ( 66

. :Integrative relationship (. :Correlative relationship (..... :Meaning (3..» : (Ausubel, D.P ).«" " : :. :( ) מ א : :Advance organizers (1... :Explanative advance organizers (2. :Comparative advance organizers (3 67

:. (. ( :( ) מ א א מ :. :. :. : :... : ( ) : ( ) מ א :Meaning reception (1. :Rote reception (2.. 68

:Meaning full Discovery Learning. (3 ( ). :Rote Discovery (4. ( ) מ א מ א ( ).., : : (1. : (2 ) (.. (3. Assimilation (4 69

א... ( ) (5 :Advance organizers. מ א : (Bruner, J.S ) : (... 1915) Bruner, J.S : : ( ) " ". ( ) : (Bruner, J.S ) א מ א» :toward a theory of instruction ( ).«: ( )... :the active mode of learning (I : 70

:the Iconic mode of learning. :.. ) (... :the symbolic mode of learning :... :the function of categorization (IIא מ א א מ ( ) ( ). : ( ) : (1 ( ).. : (2. ( ) (3 71

( ) :. : ( ) : ( ) מ א (III :the principle of motivation (1 ( ). :the principle of cognitive structure (2 ( ) ( ).. : (3. : (4... : ( ). ( (... (.. ) ( (.. ). ( ) :( ) מ א א מ (IV 72

: :. : : :... :... :. ( ). א מ»: ( ) :( ) «. ( ) :.. (. (. ) ( 73 (V

.( (.. : ( ) מ א. :. :.. ( ) :( ) מ א מ א א (VI : ( ).... :. (. ( (. (. מ א 74

(Bruner, J.S ) :. : (1. (2... (3. (4. 75

א א מ א : (Rotter, J.B ) ) : 1916 (Rotter, J.B (Adler, R ).(University of Indiana ) 1941 : (Rotter, J.B א א ) : : ( ) (1 Motivation Cognition Behavior.. ( ) (2 :... (3 ( ). א א :( ) : ( ) : : (I). ( ). 76

.. : :.. :. : :... : :.. א מ א א א ) ). :Expectancy (E) (1. 77

:Behavior potential (B.P) (2. :Reinforcement Value (R.V) (3. ( ) ( ) (1 External reinforcement Internal reinforcement ( ). (2. : ( ) ( ). Recognition status Dominance Independence protection - dependency Love an affection physical confort :Need Components ( ) (1 (2 (3 (4 (5 (6 א : Freedom of movement (F.M). Need potential (N.P). Need value (N.V) : (1 (1 (2 (3 78

. :. : (3 : P33 (Rotter, & Chance & Phares, 1972 ) (2. א מ ( ) :( ) : ( ).....( ) : ( ).( ). : (1. : ( ) (2. 2 ( ) : (3 : ( ) :control Internal-External Locus of 79. (2

(1. ) (2.( (3 ( ).( ).. : (4. : (5 (.. ) (.. ). א מ א (Rotter, J.B ) ( ) Cognition Behavior :.. Motivation ( ) 80

( ) (1 ص نف حي ث ) ( :. (1. (2. (3. (4. א מ א : ( Bandura, A ( א (Bandura, A ) : (... 1925) University of Iowa (Social Learning theory ) : 1971.1977 א א א מ א : ) (Cignition ) (Behavior ).(Environment. 81

P B E א מ א א א : : :Social Learning (1. :Modeling or observational Learning (2.Modeling :Self control or Self regulation (3. ( ) :Cognitive processes (4 ( ). :Processes of observational Learning (5. א א א מ ( א) : :.( ) 82

:... :. :. :. :. :.. א א א מ א א מ א : : :Observational Learning effect (. :Inhibitory Disinhibitory effects ( (.. ) 83

. : ).(.. :Social Facilitation Effect (... :Extrinsic feed Back ( ). : מ א א ( ) :.. ( ). א א (א ) :Vicarious reinforcement.. 84

(Bandura, A 1971 1977 )...( ) :Informative function (1. :Motivational function (2. :Emotional Learning :Influemceability function (3. (4. :Modification function (5. :Valuation function (6. :.( ) ( ) (Bandura, A, 1977) 85

א מ א ( Bandura, A ( א ( ) :..... Information processing א :. א א א א : (1. (2 86

. : (3. (4. : (5 Retrieval Storing Processing (1 ) Acquisition : (6 : (1 (2 (3 (4 (5 (6 395 (1996 ). : Sensory registers Focal attention Speed of processing 87

303 ( ). : א ] [ ( Shiffren & Atkinson 1971 ) : ( ) ( ) ( ) 15. (1971 ) ( 02 ) 334 (1983 ). :Sensory Registers [Sensory memory(s.m)]( ) : 88

( ). ( ) :. 407 (1996 ) : Short-term memory (S.T.M) ( ) : ( 20). (2±) (... ) Working memory ( ) :.... :. (1 : (2... 89

: Encoding : (1 ( ) :. Organizition : (2 :..... Rehearsal : ( ) (3..... ( ) : (4..... : Long-term memory (LTM) 130 (1992 ) : 90

........" " : ( ) : ( ( ).( ) : ( ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ). 136 (1983 ) : Mnemonics Strategies. א א א א. (Lindsay,P.H & Norman,D.A 1977 ) 91

:. (1 (2. (3 ) 370 (1977 : : Imageny :. :... 1492 :. (1. (2. (3 (4. (5 (6 ). : Chain Method 370 (2001 : : Link Method. 92

: Keyword Method : connections : :. :» : «372 (2001 ). : Pegword Method : א : 10 1. : Acronyms : [North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)]:. : Loci Method : :... : Meaning : ( ) 93

298 (1998 )... ( ) א.. :..... 4 (2005 ).. 441 (1996 ). 94

Metacognition Metacognition : Metacognitive skills K W L H technique (1 Activating prior Knowledge Strategy. Self - Questioning Strategy P.S. Q. 5 R Strategy Thinking Aloud Strategy. Brain Storming. (2. (3 (4 (5 (6 95

Metacognition : Metacognition :. 1976 ) : (Flavell, J.H : :. ) (Flavell, J.H 1979» : (Hacker,D.J 1998 ).«(Flavell, J.H 1979 ) : א א א : : : (I. (1. (2 96

(3. : (II. : (III. : (IV 51 (2006 ). (Flavell,J.H1979 ) : א א : ) (Schraw,G&Dennison,S1994) (2004 ) (2001 : : : Declarative Knowledge :( ) (1. Procedural Knowledge : (2. Conditional Knowledge : (3. : : Planing : (1. 97

Information Management : (2.( ) Monitoring : (3. Debugging : (4. Evaluation : (5 10 (2001 ) 169 (2004 ). ) (Brown, A.L, 1980), (Korosky, 1978), (Hatt, 1980) (... (Borkowski, J.G, 1992), (Klow, 1982) (Brown, A.L, 1980) ( ) ( ). ( ) (Klow, 1982) (Paris,S.G & Winograd, P,1990) (Klow). 98

(Brokowski, J.G, 1992). ( ).. (Schraw, G and Dennison, R.S, 1994) (Schoenfeld, A.H, 1987) ( ) 17 (2002 ). (Rikey, D, & Stacy, A.M, 2000) (Harris, D.M, 1998). (... ) ) (Chiang, L.H, 1998). 19 (2002 (Brown, A.L, 1989) (Barell, J, 1991). ) Metacognition : א א מ ( 99

: : (Paris, S.G and Winogsrd, P 1990) (Borkowski, J et Al, 1987) : : ( Flavell, J.H, 1976 ): (Osman, M.E & Hamnfin, M.J, 1992) (Biggs, J.B and Moore, P.J, 1993) : : ) (Shoenfeld, A.H, 1992) : 25 (2002 Metacognitive Activities :... ( ). 25 (2002 ). ( ) : (Henson, K.T and Eller, B.F, 1999) :.. 100

. (2002 ). (Omrod, K, 2000) (Hyerle, D, 2000) (Biggs, R and Moore, : : P, 1993).. ) : (Sternberg, R.J) (Assessment /Monitoring and Controlling /Planning 56 (2002 ). Self- regulated Learning.»: 53 (2006 ).«( ) :.( ) 101

Personal Knowledge : (1. : (2. : (3 168 (2004 ). : א א : :Knowledge and Control of self (1 : Metacognitive self-control. :Knowledge and Control of process (2 (Marxano, R.J et Al, 1988) :. (. ( Procedural Declarative ( ) : Conditional 102

.. :. ) : 26 (2002 ( 03 ). ). 28 (2002 103

: א א מ א : ). (1 49 (2002 (2 210 (2003 ).. (3 (4 (Koch, A, 2000) (1996 ). (5 ) (1997 ).. (6 (Wilson, E, 1995 1988. (7 (8 (Holden, T.G and Yore, D, 1996). ). (9 (Hanly, G, 1995 2000. (10. (11 :Metacognitive skills א א א» : (Nolan, M.B, 2000).«] :» : 104

«] : (Ashman, A.F and et Al, 1994). [ : א א א א מ א א : : :Determine learning objectives (1. ( ) :Manage time in learning (2. :Understand sequence (3. :Determine prerequisites (4. ( ) :Use learning Resources (5. :Self monitoring (6 (Horak, W.J, 1991). 105

:. (1. (2. (3. (4. (5. (6 (Gama, C, 2001). (7 : (Maning, B.H and Payne, B.D, 1996). (1999 ) א א א : : :Process (1. :Reflectivity (2. :Functionality (3. :Self-Diagnosis (4. :Scaffolding (5 106

:Preconception :Cooperation :Goal.... (1999 ) :Learning conception. : א א א א א א 179 (2004 ) (6 (7 (8 (9 ( ). ( ) :. (Robert, M.J, 1993) Questioning Self - Questioning 107

179 (2004 ). Self Monitoring ) ( ( ) Concept mapping :. ( 04 ) (Blakay, E et Al,1998) א א א א : (1 :.. 108

K.( ) W L H technique Activating prior Knowledge Strategy. (2 Self - Questioning Strategy. ) Thinking Aloud Strategy P.S. Q. 5 R Strategy (3 (4.(. Brain Storming... (5 (6 (1 א א : K. W. L. H technique (NCREL, 1995). : (K W L H) What we know about : (Know) : K the subject?. : (Want) : W What we want to find out?. What we learned? (Learn) : L. :(How) : H 109

(2002 ). :............................................................ 39 (1998 : / ).... Activating prior knowledge strategy 185.(2003 ). (2 א א א א : ( ) 110

188 (2003 ). : : ( ) ( ) ( ) :.... :.. :...... (3 א א א א א : Self - Questioning Strategy 111

(Baker, D.R, and Pebum, M.D, 1987). 74 (2001 ). : : Self - help Strategies 256 (2000 ) ( Marzano.. Self Planning Self - Regularing. Self - Reflecting 1998 ) : ( ) : : (1.( ) (.( ) (.( ) ( ) (.( : : (2 ( ( ( ( ) ( : : (3 ( ( 112

( ( ( ( ( ) ) 22 (1999 19 (2000 ). (Gunstone, R & Nothfield, J1994) P 524 226 (2000 (4 א א ) :(P S Q 5 R) (. : Purpose (P) : Survey (S).. : Question (Q) 113

..(R) (5 R) Read Selectibely (R). : Recite (R) ( ).. : Reduce Record (R). :Reflect (R).. :Review (R) (Meichen baum, D 2003). (5 א א א :thinking aloud strategy. (Hartman, H.J 2001) : 114

pair problem solving (2003 ) 205 :.. 220 (2004 ). :....... 115

116... (Hartman, H.J, 2001) P 35. :... ) (1 (2 (3 ( ) (4.... (Hartman, H.J, 2001)P 39 (5 (.. (Serran, G 2002).. (Mc Guire, K et Al 1996) (Jimeney, R et Al, 1994)..

:Brain storming א א א א (6 16 (2002 ).. 209 (2003 ).. :..... 117

). 165 (2000 : : :. : : (10 7). ( ) :. : : ( ). :... : : ).(.. 118

. :....... :. : :. : : : (1 (2 (3 (4 119

(5 (6 : : ). 18.(2002 : א א א א : (1... (2... (3.. (4. : א א א מ א א מ א Normal Learning cycle : ( ) : 158 (2002 ) (Piaget,J ) ) (2000 ) (Odom, K, 2001) (Martin, J.C, 1991) :(1995 ) ((1996 (1 120

Explaration (3 Concept application (2 Concept introduction (Blank, M.L, 2000) (05) ( ) :Exploration phase : (1 ( ). :Concept indradution phase : (2 (2002 ) :Concept Application : (3 : (Odom, K, 2001). ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ). 121

( ) (Odom, K,. 2001)... ( 06 ) Metacognitive Learning : : :cycle (Piaget, J ) : Concept Assessment status check Concept Application status check Concept introduction status check Concept Exploration 122

(Blank, M.L, 2000) ( 07 ) :Concept Explaration (1 : ) 120 (2002 :Concept introduction status check (2. : (Blank, M.L, 2000) :Concept Application status check (3 : :Concept Assessment status check (4 : 123

(Blank, M.L, 2000)....... : : א א א א מ א : ( 01) : א א א א א :. 124

.... 166 ( 2002 ). : א א א :... (Romainville, M 1994) ( Spence, D.J and et Al 1995) ( El-Hindi, A.E 1996) (Schraw, G 1998 ) ( Symons, S & Reynolds, P.L 1999) (08). 4 3 ( ) 2 1 ( 08 ) 34 33 / 2002 125

א א א א א א : :. :( ) :. :( ) :. : : (2002 ). (3 2 1) :. : :. : (Gredler, M.E, 1997) P 72. 126

....... 127

: :. (1 دافعية الا نجاز والمفاهيم المتصلة بها : ] [.... ) 7 ( (Granich,L1932 ) 6 ( ) 6 ( ) 128

(1995 87 (1995 (McClelland,D.C & Atkinson,J.W ) :. (1. (2. (3. (4 ). (5 ) (1953 McClelland ) (Atkinson ) ]: ) [ 99 (1995 ( Litwin,G.H & Stringer,R.A 1975 ) : (1. (2... (3 (4 129

(5. (6 ).41 ( (MaClelland,D.C & Atkinson,J.W 1972 ) Entwistle,N.J ) ) : ( & Wilson1977 9 8 (1993 ). ( (1995 ) :. ( ) (1. ( ) (2. (3 (4 66 65 (1995 ). (1979 ) : 130

).. 9 7 (1979 ).. (1 (2 (3 (4 (Murray,H.A 1938 ) 79 (1995 ) (.. (McClelland,D.C1961 )»: 175 (1988 ) «: (Atkinson,J.W 1964 ) ( ) (. ( ) (. :.43 (1979 ) ( McClelland,D.C 1951 ) 131

(Affective Continuum)» : «: 37 36 (1979 ) ( the Expectancy Value Approach ) (Katz, I 1968 ) :. 97 (1995 ) (Atkinson,J.W1964 ) ( ) :. (44 /2). =. = = + : = + (Korman 1974 ) ) (Mahone,C.H 1960.98 97 (1995 ) ) ( ).46 ( 132

) (1993) : (.. ) ( ) ( 129 91 (1993). (Veroff,J 1971 ). 260 (1984 ) (Husaini,B1976 ).259 (1984 ) :.261 (1984 ) 133

: (Weiner,B ).48 (1993 ) 134 2) تطور مفهوم» دافعية الا نجاز «: (Heckhawsen 1967 ).44 (1986 ) (Teevan,R.C 1972 ) : ( ) (1. (2.. ) 161 (1977 )

: (Atkinson,J.W, 1975 : : (1. : (2.103 (1995 ) ( Purkey, N.W 1970 ) (Kardiner 1970 ) 260 (1984 ). ) (1993 ) : : (.. ). (Farquhar 1971 ) 37 7 (1990 ( Marley,R,O 1979 ) 260 (1984 ) ). ) (McDermott,R1977 ) 559 (1988 (Brophy,J&Good,T 1970 135

.. (Winterbotton, M.R1958 : ) 46 (1987 ). 3) العوامل المو ثرة في دافعية الا نجاز :... ) 187 (1982 189.. (1 : (1982 120 ) 188 189 (1982. (Winterbotton, M.R1958. ) :. ) 40 ( Rosen, B.C 1959 ) 188 189. ( ) 136

( 11 9) ( ) 8 : (1 (2 :.....200 198 (McClelland,D.C 1961 ) 198 (1961 ) 137

.160 (1961 ) : 198 (1961 ) (1989 ) ) (1998 ).159 ( ). 145 (1998. ).... 255 ( 171 (1992 ) 138

. : : (1.... (2..260 ( ) (3 (Hurlock 1967 ) 257 ( ). ( ) (1961 ) : (2 ) ( ) ( : ( McClelland, D.C 1953 ) 139

(Veroff,J 1975).262 (1984 ) ).262 (1984 8 (1984 ). (Tohidi, N 1984 ) ) ) : (.. ). 27 (Tohidi, N 1984 : (3 140

166 (1988 ) (McClelland,D.C ) (1988 ) Mac Kinnon,D.W ) 183 (1962 ) 256 (1984 12 ( Cortes,F 1967 ) 257 (1984 ) 141

) 23 (1984 ) (Johnson, W.H1977 ) : (..20 (Johnson, W.H1977 ) ( ) ( ) ) : (McClelland,D.C1961 ) 166 (1977 ). ( : 40 (1986 ) (1984 )...258.166 (1977 ) 142

: (1 171 (1988 ) ( ) (2 ( )... : (1986 ) ( ).. 52 (1986 ) ( Bloom, B 1976 ) (Bloom ) ) (1998 ): 92 ( ) : ( 97 (1998 ) ) 49 ( 143

( ).172 (1988 ) ( ) : (1995 ) 16 (1995 ) 4) خصاي ص ومميزات الشخصية الا نجازية :....... : :( Hemans, H.J.M1970 ). 144 (1...

......7 ( Hemans, H.J.M1970 ).10 (1977 ) : (Muray,H A 1938 ) (2.........57 (1986) :(1986) (3...... : (1988) (4.... 145

.165 (1988).. : (1979) (5......45 (1979 ). (1995) : ( 12)...( )...( ).( ).... 155 (1995 ) ( Feather,N.T 1961 ) 146

....112 (1995 ) ) : (Lowel, E.L 1952 ) (.47 (1986 ).. 258 (1984 ) 5) خصاي ص ومميزات المجتمع الا نجازي : Antecedents ). 172 (1992 147

(McClelland,D.C 1961 ) (the Achieving Society 1961 ) (1975 ) ] ( ) 6 (1995 ) [ : 15 (1961 ) 23 (1961 ) 65 (1961 ) 71 (1961 ) 97 (1961 ) (McClelland,D.C 1961 ) : 148

: (1 15 (1961 ) ( ) 1953 1908 2500! : (2.. ) (1940 ) (Martin Luther ) Max Weber (Joe Kelvin 58 (1961 )...!! 65 (1961 ) : (3 149

.90 (1961 ).( :1975 ) 1 (1961 ) : (4 8 (1978 ) :. : ) 17 (1961 ) ( ) (McClelland,D.C 1961 ( 475 900) ( 362 ( 100 362) 475) 85 (1961 ). ) ) (1991 ( 150

. 33 (1991 ). 6) قياس دافعية الا نجاز : ) :.198 (1992 الفي ة الا ولى :... )... (... (Thematic Apperception Test ) (TAT) 20 ( ) : (1 (2 (3 151

) 19 ( ) (4 (McClelland,D.C et al 1949 ).88 ( 04 (TAT ) 156 (1977 ) (TAT).88 ( ) ). ( (McClelland 1953 ) 0,58 1985 ( ) (Entwisle 1972 ) 0,96.88 (Edwards, E ) ( TAT) ) (Mahrabian, A ) (Pesonal perferance Shedule).88 ( ) (1977 Marlowe1959) (Winstein 1969 ) 1968.89 ( ) 0,4 152

الفي ة الثانية : : Mehrabian ) ( (Hermans 1970 ) 153 Weiner ) (1968. : ( / / / / ).( / / / / ). 7) فكرة عن تنمية دافعية الا نجاز :.. :.173 (1988 ) (El Kind, D1978 )...58 (1986 )

.197 (1992 ).. ).. 197 (1992 ( ) )..46 (1995 154

. :. :. : :.. 155

: : : (1. (2. (3... حول الوعي بالعمليات المعرفية : دراسات (1983) Wingenbach, N.G א (1 ( metacogntion ) (1 : ( ) (2. (3. 100. : «the Lowa tests ل وا» (1: 156

(2. (3.. (1985) Wittman, M.A א (2 63 (1 : (2. :. (3. ( ) ( ) ) 13 ( (1 :. (2 (3.. : (1989) Wang א : א (3 ( ) : Metacognition 157

30) ( 30) ( 60). ( Thinking Loud.. (1990) Mayer, M.K א (4 57 51 : ( ) (1: (2. (3. (4. (5. (6.. : (1992) א א (5. 158

( 474) : / ( 682) (16) (11). 16.. : (1993) א א מ א א (6 :. ) ( :. 182. ) (. : (1999) א : א (7 :. : (11) (9) (7). ( ) (11) : (9) (7) 440.( ) ) 54 159

: ( 18 54 (11) (9) (7) = (3 18) :. : ) (.... : (2000) א : א (8. : ( 45) ( 48) :.2000 1999 :. ( ) 12).( 40) : :.(. ) ( ). ( :. 20 160

" ". 18.2000 45 08 32 : :... (1 :. (2. (3. (4.. : (2001) א א : א (9. : ( 40)..( 40) ( : (1 :. (. : (2. ( 08) ]:. ( 04) 161 ( 45) ( 32)

2000 ( 15) 2001 :.[... :.. : (2001) א : א (10 :. / / ) : ( 35) :.( (1] :.( 36) ( 31).( 34). (3/ (2/ :. (1 :. (2. 162

(3.. : ( /2002) א מ א : א (11 :. ] : ( ).[ ( ) : 45) 90 :.( ) ( 45) ( :.2002 ( ).. ( ). : ( ) ( ). ( ) :.... 163

: ( /2002) א מ א : א (12 : :. 120 :. (1 : (3 40 (2 40 :. 40 :.( ) ( ) (1) (1. (2) (2. ( ) (3. ( ) (4. (5 ( ). :... : (2002) א : א (13. : 164

. ( 35) 1 : 2.( ) 3. 4. 40 : ( 33). 2001).(2002 / ) 3 9..( :. ( ) :.... : (2002) Al Shaye S.S א : א (14 46 : : :. 15 31. 165

(1 : (2. (3.. (4 :.. (2003) : א (15 :. (1 : ( ) (2.( ). :. ). : ) : (. :. ( ( 38) : (1 :.( 38) (2. : (3.. ( ) (1 : 166

(2. (3. :.... : (2003) א : א (16 :.( ) ( ) ( ) 136) ( 134) 270 : :.( 215 55) (...Raven :...... :. 167

... : (2003) א א : א (17. ( 34). (1:. (2. ( ) : (1 : :( 03) : (2.... (3.. : :..... 168

: (2004) א מ : א (18 : ( 58) ( ). :. (0,05 = ). :.. : (2004) : א (19 :. ( 40 = ( 40 ) : 80 = ) (1 :. ) (3 (2 ( :. 169

.. :.... (2004) Berkowitz, E א (20 10 (1: (2. (3. (4. (5. (6. (7. (8. 170

. : (2005) : א (21 :. 50 100.. :. (1 :. (2. :.. :...... : (2005) א : א (22. (1 : ( ) (2 ) (3 ( 171

) 145 ( 2 (2 2) :.( ) 2 ( ) 79 ( :. (. (. :. (..... (2006) מ א : א (23.. : 172

(140) : (1:.( 69 ) ( 71 ). (3. (2... :.( ).... :.... ) (2006) : א (24 :.( (1: 80 :. (2. (1:.( 40 40 : ) : (2. (..( ). 173

:.. :.... : دراسات حول دافعية الا نجاز : (1977) Johnson,w.h א (25 Non - cognitive cognitive achievement achievement Open space classrooms 318 :. 315 84 :. : :... 174

(1:. (2.. : (1984)Tohidi,N א (26. Achiever ( URSS ) 220 :. 18 17 ( ) ) : :.(.. ) (. :. :.. % 37. ( ) 175

....... : (1987) א : א (27 :. : : 235. :. :.1978 (Caughrem) (0,01)... ( + ).( + ). (1988) א : א (28 176

:. 172. 18,2 «Raven, J. C 1938 (2 22 16 (3.(1986)» (1 :.1979.2,5 : ( ) :. :. (n.ach ).(n.aff ) ( : (. :.. ( ). Kolb. (,D.A 1965) 177

.... : (1990) Siry, J. M א (29..( 31 28) 59. :. :. : (1993) א א : א (30 :. : : 220 : ) (1 :. :. (2.(1981... 178

....( ) :.. : (1993) : א (31 :. ( ). ( / ) (1: (2 (Crandall,V1963 : ( 290 419 ) 709 : I A R ) (3.(Smith.J1973) : ( ) : 50) (0,05 α) ( ). ( 75) :. ( (0,0001 α).. (0,0001 α). ( ) :. 179

. : (1994) : א (32 :. : : 10) (11 13) (14 17) (18 :.. :.. 238): ( 714) 238) ( 238) (. ( (1 :. : (0,01) (2. (0,05) (0,05) (3. (0,01). : (1995) א א : א (33 : 180

(1 : ( 174 190) 346. (2 (0,01) : ) :.(.... : (1996) א א : א (34 :. ( ) ( ). ( ) : (632) (1 :.( 172 109 351) (2.( ) : (1= ) (2= ) (3= ) (4= ) (5= ) :... ( ) ( ). : (1997) א א : א (35 181

:. / ) ( ) ( ) (. ( ) ( 292 278) 570 (186 ) (191 ) (193 ) ( 294 276) (1:. (2 (1 : (2. ( ) (3. ) ( (4. ( ) ) :. (....... : (1998) : א (36 : ( ) 40 (1:. 64 37 23 182

(2. 17,5 62 26 22 32. 21,5 Dolye 1978 ) : 9 (&Moen ]:.[. (1 : : (2. (3.. (1 : (2. (3. (4. (5.. (6 183

(7. (8. (9. (10. (11. (12.. (1998) Leonadri & Syngollito א א (37 (289) " ( 143 " Myers 146) " " Rosenberg ).( ) (. :. (73,81) (26,19).. (1999) א : א (38 184

( ) ( ) ( ) 435 : 85) 197 ( 236 199) ( 110 128) 238 ( 112 21 17,8 1991 " (1 : (1999) : " Pintrich,P &Garcia,T :. (2..... : (2000) א : א (39. : ( ) ( ) ( ) (420) : 16) ( 18 ( 165 255) ) (1 :.(1991 ) (2.(1981 : 185

( ). ( ) ( )... : (2000) א א : א (40. :. ) 144 ) ( ) ( 48 (.( ) : 14) ( 15 :... ( ). (2001) א א א : א (41 :. ( ) : ( 242). ( 124 98) (1 : (1,89) ( 20,93) 186

) ) (2 (1987 :.(1978 ( ) ). (. ( ). : (2001) א : א (42 :. ) ( ) ( ( 128 72) 200 (Hermans, H.J.M 1970) : (Speilberger,C.D et al : 1987.(1984 ) 1970). ( ) ( )..( ). 187

.. :... : (2001) א מ : א (43 : 270 (160) (110).( ). (2. (1 : (5. (4. (3 :..... EVI : (2002) : א (44 :. ( 200) 188

(1 :. (2. 10 08 (3. 08 Bobbi, ) : (4.10 :. 30 (Fibbel,W & Hall, D.( ) ( ).( ). :...... : دراسات حول العلاقة بين: الوعي بالعمليات المعرفية ودافع الا نجاز الدراسي : (1980) א (45 :. ( ) 199 ( ) : ( 21,3 ) (RAVEN,J.C 1978 ) Progresive Matrices (1 : ( 60 ) 189

5,25 05 ) 5,11 ). 8,25. 0,01 ( ). 05 : 0,05 0,01.... ]: (1981) א : א (46 [. (1 :. (2 500.. 31 : 14,42 (F ) : (Dotson,B 1981 ).. 190

( ) 167,17 :. (1. (2. (3 ]: (1988) א (47 : [ ( ) ( ) :. ( 165). (2. (1 : (5. (4. (3. :. ( ).. 191

( ) ( ). ( ). ( ). : (1989) א : א (48 :.. 375 : :. (2. ( ) : (1. Gordon,L.V : : (3 :... 192

. :. ( ) ( ).. ] : (1993) א : א (49 :. [ ( 180) Motivational Components : (1: (22) Self - Regulated ( 17 15) Scale (2. (23) learning Strategies Scale (3 :... 193

:.... : :.. :. (1993) א מ א א : א (50 [ ] : : ( 159):. :. 14,03 :. 194

:.. ]: (1998) א : א (51 : [ Weiner,B 1989 :. ( 200) ( 30) (1 :. ( 30). (2. (1 : (2. (3. 195

(4.. ] : :(1998) Lehman. F א (52 ( ) : [ ( 60) ( 74) (120) : the Bloomer lerning test. : :.. (2003) Bandalos, et al, א (53 ( / ) ( ) 176. (Med Western University ) (Roedel, et al1994) (MSLQ) Pintrich & ( ) 196

.1990 DeGroot. : ) :.( / /.. :.. (2006 ). (2003) Schmidt & Ford, א (54 ) ) ( / / 79. ( 22 (Med Western University ). %67 42 37 10 5 197

. :.( ) ( ). ( ) ) ( ) ( ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (2006 ). AL-Emadi,A 2003 א א (55 ) ( ) / /. ( ) 153 ( 217 206) 423 270 1997 Elliot & Chruch :. 1999 Elliot, et al /. /. /. 198

. / 199

א א א : ( ) :. : א א א א א : : :... (1.. (2.. (3 ) ( ) (... : 200

(1.... (2 : ).. (...... ) ( (.. ) : (3.. ) (............ : א א א א א א א : : (1. : (2 201

........ (3. (4 ( ). (5...... : (6 ( ).. 202

.. ( ).. : א א א : : א א א א א א א : (1... (2 (3. (4. ) (5 (... (6... (7 : 203

....... ( ). : א א א א א א :. 204

.. Metacognition :.. : : : Achievement Motive :.. :.. : : 205

: ( ) :. : א : ( 02 ) % % % % 17,32 174 1005 % 21,69 144 664 % 08,80 30 341 % 49,69 246 496 % 50,95 162 318 % 47,20 84 178 % 27,99 420 1501 % 31,17 306 982 % 21,97 114 519 % 24,35 168 690 % 23,52 119 506 % 26,64 49 184 % 29,67 175 590 % 30,59 137 448 % 26,77 38 142 % 26,80 343 1280 % 26,84 256 954 % 26,69 87 326 % 20,17 342 1696 % 22,48 263 1170 % 15,05 79 525 % 38,77 421 1086 % 39,04 299 766 % 38,13 122 320 % 27,44 763 2781 % 29,03 562 1936 % 23,79 201 845 1 4 1 4 1 4 800 ( ) : א (4 1 ) ( ) ( ) %27,44 763 = (%27,99) 420 = : (% 29,03) 562 = (% 23,79) 201 = : (%38,77) 421 = (% 20,17) 342 = : (% 26,80) 343 = ( ). : : : «Metacognition» I 206

«Achievement Motive» II : «Metacognition א א» : 2 1] 50 [ 5 4 3 : (Likert ) : 01 02 «א א» א א א : ) : ( (2004 ) ) (1992 ) (Wolfs,J.L 1998) : ) (2000 ) (1993 ) (2004 ) (1997 ) (1994 ) (2001 ) (2003 ) (2002 ) (1994 ) (1983 ) (1993 Costa,A.L 1985 ) (1990 ) (1991 ) (1993 (Peirce, W, (Hacker, D.J, 1997) (Cooper, S, 2004) (King, K, 2001) (1998 (Shia, R.M, 1999) (Suicegood, M.M, 1994) (Livigiston, J.A, 1997) 2003) (Romacnvillle,M, & Noel, B, 2003) (Partoune,C,1999) (Papaleontiou, L.E, 2003) (Pirot,L, & De Keyel, J.M, 2000) (Otero, J, & Companario, J.M Hopkins,D. K 1992). (Perrin, J.P, 2005) א א : ) ( ) ( : 207

[ [ [ / [ / / / /. א א :» «: :(Flavell, H 1985 ) (1 / /. :(Wolfs,J.L 1998 ) (2.[ / / / / :(Brawen, A 1978 ). [ / :(Paris, S.G, and Winograd, P 1990 ) (3.[ / :(Strenberg, 1985 ).(Hennessy,M.G 1999) (2000 ) [ (4 (5 [ / / ] (6 : ( / ( ):[ ( [ )/ ).[ / :[ : ( :. ( 03 ) (-) (+) 10 03 07 10 02 08 10 03 07 10 02 08 10 01 09 50 11 39 208

39 50. 11 (3) א א א : ) (. א א :. : : : מ א (1 : (1 (2 (- ) (3 (+ ) (4 (4). : ( 3. / /.. ( 209 4

א מ : :.. ( ) " ( (1 (2 (3. " (4. : (5. ( 04 ) 14 06 10 11 09 50 (-) 05 01 02 02 02 12 (+) 09 05 08 09 07 38 א ( ) : ( (%50 ). (Danielson,W.A ) Coefficient of Reliability the average percentage of agreement 01 02 03 04 05 210

(05) : : - + - + % 06.66 % 20 % 00 % 73.33 26 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 % 06.66 % 13.33 % 06.66 % 73.33 27 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 % 00 % 06.66 % 00 % 93.33 28 % 00 % 13.33 % 06.66 % 80 % 06.66 % 20 % 06.66 % 66.66 29 % 06.66 % 33.33 % 06.66 % 53.33 % 00 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 86.66 30 % 00 % 00 % 00 % 100 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 13.33 % 73.33 31 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 % 06.66 % 20 % 00 % 73.33 32 % 06.66 % 40 % 06.66 % 46.66 % 00 % 26.66 % 00 % 73.33 33 % 00 % 13.33 % 06.66 % 80 % 00 % 33.33 % 00 % 66.66 34 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 % 06.66 % 13.33 % 06.66 % 73.33 35 % 00 % 26.66 % 00 %73.33 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 36 % 00 % 00 % 00 % 100 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 37 % 00 % 13.33 % 00 % 86.66 % 00 % 06.66 % 00 % 93.33 38 % 00 % 20 % 06.66 %73.33 % 06.66 % 26.66 % 00 % 66.66 39 % 00 % 13.33 % 13.33 %73.33 % 00 % 00 % 06.66 % 93.33 40 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 00 % 86.66 % 00 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 86.66 41 % 00 % 26.66 % 00 %73.33 % 06.66 % 13.33 % 00 % 80 42 % 00 % 20 % 13.33 % 66.66 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 00 % 86.66 43 % 13.33 % 20 % 00 % 66.66 % 13.33 % 06.66 % 00 % 80 44 % 13.33 % 20 % 06.66 % 60 % 06.66 % 00 % 00 % 93.33 45 % 06.66 % 20 % 20 % 53.33 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 80 46 % 00 % 13.33 % 00 % 86.66 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 47 % 00 % 26.66 % 06.66 % 66.66 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 48 % 13.33 % 26.66 % 00 % 60 % 00 % 33.33 % 00 % 66.66 49 % 00 % 20 % 00 % 80 % 06.66 % 20 % 06.66 % 66.66 50 % 00 % 06.66 % 06.66 % 86.66 ) (05) ( ) ( 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 : ( )/ ( )/ (-)/( ) (+) ( ) 211

:.... ( 5). : א א א ( 2 : ( ) ) ( ) : (2006 ) ( (06) (%100) 235 (%63.82) 150 (%36.17) 85 : (%100) 235 (%17.02) 40 (%34.04) 80 (%11.06) 26 (%37.87) 89 : (%100) 235 (%07.23) 17 (%49.78) 117 (%42.97) 101 : : א א א א א א :. ( 5 212

: 213

(07) 14 06 10 11 09 50 50 47 45 41 37 36 32 31 26 21 16 11 6 1. 27 22 17 12 7 2. 49 42 38 33 28 23 18 13 8 3 48 46 43 39 34 29 24 19 14 9 4.44 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 א א א : 323 (2002 ) א א מ :.... א א :... א א מ :. א א א מ :.. א א (Reliability) :(Alpha ) : א : ( : (SPSS). (,81) ( ) : ( 214

),80 (. (Validity) : א א : (1993 ) 131. 400 (1978 ). 118 (1987 ).(Anastasi, A1976) " " : (08) 1,51**,52 **,55 **,60 **,54 **,58 **,60 **,41 **,54 **,44 ** 1,74 **,84 **,78 **,71 **,78 ** ** correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2 tailed) ( 08 )..(09) 215

(09) א א.364**.375** 04.286**.290** 01.330**.391** 09.468**.470** 06.394**.353** 14.384**.564** 11.512**.511** 19 :.276**.283** 16.466**.469** 24.324**.278** 21 א.337**.476** 29.424**.538** 26 : א מ.577**.604** 34 א.430** 31.374** ( 11).529**.549** 39.466**.487** 32 א א.434**.505** 43.422**.466** 36 ( 14).528**.635** 46.466**.353** 37.433**.486** 48.311**.496** 41.257**.283** 05.261**.408** 45.347**.588** 10.334**.352** 47.503**.590** 15 :.361**.452** 50.426**.557** 20.548**.757** 02 א א.401**.563** 25.533**.714** 07 : מ א.390**.468** 30 א.493** 12.403** ( 09).360**.538** 35.452**.666** 17 מ א.231**.206** 40.587**.614** 22 ( 06).353**.546** 44.505**.642** 27.337**.412** 03.399**.617** 08 N = 235 ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)..311**.573** 13 :.571**.530** 18 א.423**.523** 23 א.391**.424** 28 ( א 10).401**.419** 33.580**.598** 38.323**.525** 42.341**.436** 49 (09) 216

. (10) א א,27. 16,26..... 45,25. 05,23. 40 46 : 05 (11) 12 46 44 41 38 35 31 26 21 16 11 6 1 07 39 27 22 17 12 7 2 09 42 36 32 28 23 18 13 8 3 11 45 43 40 37 33 29 24 19 14 9 4 07 34 30 25 20 15 10 5 46 217

[ (52) : א א א א (II : (Likert ) : 01 02 : : א א : ] : / ( 1987) / ( 1987) / (1977) (1987) / (1984) / (1988) / (1993) / (1991) / (1993) (Hermans, H.J.M 1970 ) / (1992) /(Eccles, J 1983, Pintrisk, P.R 1989 ) (1998) / (1987).[ (1988) / (1979) א א :... א א : : ( ) (Hermans, H.J.M 1970 ) (1 / [ : 10 / / / / / /.[ / / ] : (1998) (2 / / / / / / /.[ / : (1997) (3 218

[ / / / /. / : (1988) (4.[ / / (Foster, S.F et Al the international study skills inventory 1985 ) (5 : / / ]:.[ / (1983) (6 ]: 18 / / / / / / / / / / / / /.[ / / / / : (12) 09 01 08 01 12 05 07 02 09 03 06 03 10 05 05 04 12 06 06 05 52 20 32 (1 א א א א :. 219

א א א א : (2. א א מ :. : א א א. : א א א א : ) ( 15 69). : א א א א א 84 (2006 ) א א : (3 (4 (5 (1 (6) ( ( 100. 100 (2006 ) א א : : 200) (2 3 )א א : (4 א א א : ) (2003) ( ) / / ( ) (. 6 ( 220

: : א מ (1 (7) : א מ : (... : א (1. א א : (2 (3 (4 ( (1 : 06 ( / ( ) ] ( ) /( ). 7 221

. (13) : : - + - + % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 27 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 01 % 00.00 % 33.33 % 00.00 % 66.66 28 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 02 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 29 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 03 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 30 % 00.00 % 33.33 % 00.00 % 66.66 04 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 31 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 05 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 32 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 06 % 00.00 % 33.33 % 00.00 % 66.66 33 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 07 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 34 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 08 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 35 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 09 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 36 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 10 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 37 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 11 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 38 % 00.00 % 33.33 % 00.00 % 66.66 12 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 39 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 83.33 13 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 40 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 14 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 41 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 15 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 42 % 00.00 % 33.33 % 00.00 % 66.66 16 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 66.66 % 16.66 43 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 83.33 17 % 00.00 % 33.33 % 00.00 % 66.66 44 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 18 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 45 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 19 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 46 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 20 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 47 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 21 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 50 % 33.33 48 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 22 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 100 49 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 23 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 33.33 % 50 50 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 24 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 51 % 00.00 % 16.66 % 00.00 % 83.33 25 % 00.00 % 33.33 % 00.00 % 66.66 52 % 00.00 % 00.00 % 66.66 % 33.33 26 : ( )/ ( )/ (-)/( ) (+) ( ) 222

) ( ) (13) ( (%50 ) % 50 48 45 43 36 34 26 18 15 14 11 9] : [50 8. א א א א : א א :. :. ( 8 223

(14) א א.421**.531** 04.566**.571** 01.606**.259**.354** -.025.458**.256**.583**.504**.411**.297**.652**.296** 09 14 19 24 29 34 : א א א א ( 08).300**.426**.260**.310**.460**.579**.445**.527**.428**.552**.606**.607** 06 11 16 21 26 31 : א א א א ( 08).423**.438** 39.464**.528** 36.329**.368**.625**.011.243**.337**.505**.348**.310**.489**.507**.211**.531**.619**.384**.579** 05 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 : א א א א ( 08).593**.495**.358**.381**.513**.528**.584**.506**.614**.590**.420**.573**.669**.586**.577**.562** 02 07 12 17 22 27 32 37 : א א א א ( 08).523**.564** 03.530**.695** 08 :.505**.636** 13 א.290**.388** 18 א מ.422**.493** 23.641**.608** 28 ( 08).592**.667** 33.407**.503** 38 (14) 24 20 37 32 17 08 07 01 ):. ( 40. ( : א א א א : 224

(Spilt Half) (,70) (,54) ) (Alpha cronbakh).(,75) (Spearman Brown 2006 ( ( 150 85) 235 : (SPSS) (,77) (Alpha ) (1. (2 (,81) (,81). ( ) : (15) 1,59**,63**,59**,51**,48**,50**,35**,56**,60**,40** 1,73**,72**,85**,85**,77** ** correlation is significant at the 0,01 Level (2 tailed) (15). 225

: (16) א א א א מ א 07 34 29 23 18 13 7 1 06 35 24 19 14 8 2 08 40 38 36 30 25 20 9 3 ( ) 06 31 26 21 15 10 4. 07 39 37 32 27 16 11 5. 06 33 28 22 17 12 6 40 25) 40 ( 15 226

. :. :. :. :.... 227

: :... : א מ א :.(t-test ) 2 (χ 2 / ) Crosstabs א מ א : : Analysis of variance ANOVA One Way א מ א :. 228

» : : א א א :.«(Pearson Correlation): : (17) 0,74** ن( = 763 ( (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (17) (0,01) 0.74 ( )........... ( ).» : : א א א :.«( ) ( ) : (18) Independent-samples t-test Sig t - test,000 761-5,048,448,445 3,427 3,612 (562 = ) (201 = ) 763 = (18).. (0,01) 229

(3.427 < 3.612) (,445) (,448).! א א א (19) 562 = = 201 أبعاد مقياس الوعي Sig T بالعمليات المعرفية Std Dev Means,000-4,579,490 3,707,000-4,397,681 3,297,036-2,098,546 3,648,001-3,419,547 3,502,000-5,623,618 3,893 Std Dev Means,512 3,520 (1,701 3,049 (2,562 3,553 (3,517 3,351 (4,636 3,604 (5 (19) (0,01) ( ) ( ).(t-test )» : א א א :.«( ) ( ) : (20) Independent-samples t-test Sig t - test,000 761-5,80,439 3,495,418 3,698 (562 = ) (201 = ) 763 = (20) 230

(0,01) (3,495 < 3,698) (,418) (,439)!. א א א א א (21) 562 = 201 = أبعاد مقياس Sig T دافع الا نجاز الدراسي Std Dev Means Std Dev Means,000-5,435,553 3,624,568 3,375. (1,000-4,048,564 3,918,639 3,723. (2,000-4,896,588 3,621,597 3,383. (3.004-2,883,531 3,909,576 3,781. (4,000-4,488,445 3,740,439 3,576. (5,000-3,921,710 3,406,695 3,178. (6 (21) (0,01) ) : ( ) ( ) (».(t-test ) : א א א א : א.«: ( ) : (22) Independent-samples t-test ( ) 231

Sig t - test,000 761-3,591,469 3,511,425 3,628 (343 ) (420 ) (22) 763 = (0,01) < 3.628) (,425) (,469) (3.511.! א א א (23) 343 = = 420 أبعاد مقياس الوعي Sig T بالعمليات المعرفية Std Dev Means Std Dev,000-4,008,477 3,738,514,000-3,783,669 3,336,704,063-1,864,542 3,664,557,213-1,248,523 3,489,558,001-3,495,613 3,905,645 (23) Means 3,593 (1 3,147 (2 3,589 (3 3,440 (4 3,744 (5 ( ) ( ).(t-test )» : א א א : «: 232

( ) : (24) Independent-samples t-test ( ) Sig t - test,000 761-3,67,438 3,593,419 3,708 (343 ) (420 ) 763 = (24) (0,01) (3,495 < 3,698) (,419) (,438) א א א א א ( 25) 343 = 420 = أبعاد مقياس Sig T دافع الا نجاز الدراسي Std Dev Means Std Dev Means,001-3,234,541 3,631,582 3,499. (1,000-5,925,552 4,004,598 3,755. (2,005-2,798,581 3,625,609 3,504. (3,113-1,587,550 3,910,541 3,847. (4,351 -,933,469 3,713,432 3,683. (5,053-1,941 717 3,401,707 3,300. (6 (25) ( ) ( ) ) (0,01) (.. 233

..(t-test )» : א א א : ( ) «( ) : (26) Independent-samples t-test ( ) Sig t - test,017 761 2,38,476 3,607,431 3,528 (421 ) (342 ) (26) 763 =.. ( ) (0.01) (3.528 < 3.607) (,431) (,476) (1 )! 234

א א א (27) Sig T 421 = = 342 أبعاد مقياس الوعي بالعمليات المعرفية Std Dev Means,214 1,243,493 3,638,016 2,406,682 3,178,360 -,915,530 3,639,002 3,043,500 3,409,000 3,843,619 3,738 Std Dev Means,5144 3,683 (1,704 3,299 (2,577 3,603 (3,585 3,528 (4,643 3,914 (5 (27) ( ) ( ) ( ) : (t ) ( ) ( ) : ( ) ( ).( ).(t-test )» : א א א :.«( ) ( ) : (28) Independent-samples t-test ( ) Sig t - test,000 761,424 3,56,433 (421= ) (28) 3,706 3,594 (342= ) 763 = 235

( ) (0,01) < 3.706) (,433) (,424) (3.594. א א א א א ( 29) Sig T 421 = 342 = أبعاد مقياس دافع الا نجاز الدراسي Std Dev Means Std Dev,011 2,563,569 3,511,561,309 1,017,603 3,847,574,000 5,330,590 3,456,587,027 2,219,527 3,836,565,307 1,023,449 3,682,449 \,005 2,802,711 3,281,708 (29) Means 3,617. (1 3,891. (2 3,684. (3 3,924. (4 3,715. (5 3,425. (6 ( ) ) (0,01) ( ) (.(t-test ) 236

: א א : 09) ( 37) 46 : Likert ( 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 230 = 5 46 : : 763 46 = 1 46 :..( 73) ( 209) : ( / / ) :. % 20. % 20. % 60 : (30) % % 19,7 % 19,7 150 ( ) 146 % 80,6 % 60,9 465 ( ) 182 147 % 100 % 19,4 148 ( ) 183 % 100 763 (30) 237

( 763). : א א א א : 15) ( 25) 40 ( Likert ) ( : 40=1 40 : 200=5 40 188 763.. 89 ( / / ) : (31) % % 18,9 % 18,9 144 ( ) 130 % 80,7 % 61,9 472 ( ) 160 131 % 100 % 19,3 147 ( ) 161 % 100 763 (31). ( 763) 238

: א א א א א א : ( ) : (32) % % % % % 18.90 144 % 0,00 00 % 11,00 51 % 62,00 93 % 61,9 472 % 39,20 58 % 77.20 359 % 36,7 55 % 19,30 147 % 60,8 90 % 11,8 55 % 1,30 02 % 100 763 % 100 148 % 100 465 % 100 150 : (32). % 62,00. % 77,20. % 60,8.. 239

100 80 60 40 20 0 (09) (09). 240

( א א א) א א א א : (33) sig. df 2 χ 2,000,000 4 4 105,272 281,609 22 %10,9 4,147,180 24 %11,9 4,187,108 126 %22,4 4,173,151 123 %21,9 4,235,157 119 %59,2 3,562,212 118 %58,7 3,624,192 346 %61,6 3,595,201 354 %63 3,675,203 60 %29,2 2,896,313 59 %29,4 2,957,246 90 %16,9 2,896,310 85 %15,1 3,017,256 N % N % N % N % (148 = ) (465 = ) (150 = ) (150 = ) (472 = ) (144 = ) (763) (33) 2 ( ) (0,01) : 241

(34) sig. df 2 χ 2,000,000 4 4 71 249 100 N %16,9 %59,3 %23,8 % 4,181 3,573 2,880 213,682,154,209,279 72 251 97 N %17,1 %59,8 %23,1 % 4,223 3,642 2,998,151,197,239 77 216 50 N %24,4 %63 %14,6 % 4,158 3,602 2,926 199,822,156,205,304 75 221 47 N %21,9 %64,4 %13,7 % 4,232 3,685 2,980,152,204,281 (148 = ) (465 = ) (150 = ) (763) (147 = ) (472 = ) (144 = ) (34) (0,01) 2 ( ). ( ) 242

(35) sig. df 2 χ 2 80 %23,4 4,187 199 %58,2 3,604 63 %18,4 2,880 N %,000 4 179,674,167 79 %23,1 4,231,167,207 209 %61,1 3,689,195,323 54 %15,8 3,005,237 N % 68 %16,2 4,149 266 %63,2 3,573 87 %20,2 2,907 N %,000 4 224,681,139 68 %16,2 4,223,128,201 263 %62,5 3,641,204,260 90 %21,4 2,985,263 N % (148 = ) (465 = ) (150 = ) (763) (147 = ) (472 = ) (144 = ) (35) (0,01) 2 ( ) 243

. sig,000,000,000 ( א א א) א א א א (36). df 2 2 2 2 χ 2 24,603 24,662 24,254 % N % N,353 2,841 %60,0 51,272 2,847 %71,2 42,235 2,964 %10,5 37,140 3,014 %15,3 18,138 3,010 %1,6 02 ------ ------ ----- 00,176 3,431 %40,0 34,128 3,390 %21,8 17,191 3,593 %76,0 269,210 3,570 %76,3 90,176 3,736 %35,0 43,144 3,748 %50,0 ----- ----- ------ 00 ----- ----- ------ 00,136 4,145 %13,6 48,057 4,067 %8,5 10,157 4,190 %63,4 78,218 4,217 %50,0,260 2,907 %20,7 87,323 2,880 %18,4 63,201 3,573 %63,2 266,199 3,607 %58,2 199,139,445 4,149 3,612 %16,2 %100 68 562,167,448 4,187 3,427 Crosstabs %23,4 %100 12 12 80 201 (562 = ) (201 = ) (763) (36) 2 ( ) (3.427 < (0.01) 3.612) 244

).. ) (...( (37) sig,003,003,001. df 2 2 2 2 χ 2 11,599 11,793 10,542 % N % N,345 2,853 %68,1 32,305 2,837 %62,9 61,153 3,052 %07,7 17,223 2,949 %15,1 38 ---- 3,108 %01,3 01 ------ 2,913 %01,4 01,183 3,423 %31,9 15,155 3,415 %37,1 36,198 3,594 %78,3 173,194 3,580 %74,1 186,161 3,748 %37,3 28,174 3,729 %37,5 ----- ----- ----- 00 ----- ------ ----- 00,115 4,097 %14,0 31,137 4,170 %10,8 27,167 4,199 %61,3 46,165 4,188 %61,1,279 2,881 %14,6 50,279 2,880 %23,8 100,205 3,602 %63,0 216,202 3,573 %59,3 249,156,425 4,158 3,628 %22,4 %100 77 343,154,469 4,181 3,511 Crosstabs %16,9 %100 27 44 71 420 (343 = ) (420 = ) (763) (37) 245