PR167 NARRATIVE Updated 25 July 2014

Similar documents
PR122A NARRATIVE Updated 25 July 2014

PR206 NARRATIVE Updated 16 June 2015

Landscape Development

NATURE OF RIVERS B-1. Channel Function... ALLUVIAL FEATURES. ... to successfully carry sediment and water from the watershed. ...dissipate energy.

NATURAL RIVER. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute

If a Woodchuck Could Chuck Wood

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.

27. Running Water I (p ; )

STREAM SYSTEMS and FLOODS

Precipitation Evaporation Infiltration Earth s Water and the Hydrologic Cycle. Runoff Transpiration

The Equilibrium Channel & Channel Change. Peter Wilcock 3 August 2016

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

Running Water Earth - Chapter 16 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

MEANDER MIGRATION MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR THE JANUARY 2005 STORM, WHITMAN PROPERTY, SAN ANTONIO CREEK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Long Valley Meadow Restoration Project

Streams. Stream Water Flow

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

ES 105 Surface Processes I. Hydrologic cycle A. Distribution % in oceans 2. >3% surface water a. +99% surface water in glaciers b.

Figure 1. Map of Feather River Basin in northern California. (A) Region straddles the northwestern Sierra Nevada and Sacramento Valley.

Geomorphic Importance of Winter Peak Flows and Annual Snowmelt Hydrographs in a Sierra Nevada Boulder-Bedrock River

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

Year 6. Geography. Revision

Earth Science Chapter 6 Section 2 Review

Changes to Land 5.7B. landforms: features on the surface of Earth such as mountains, hills, dunes, oceans and rivers

Earth Science Chapter 9. Day 6 - Finish Capillary Action Lab - Quiz over Notes - Review Worksheets over Sections 9.2 and 9.3

Streams. Water. Hydrologic Cycle. Geol 104: Streams

Think about the landforms where you live. How do you think they have changed over time? How do you think they will change in the future?

Stream Classification

River Sediments. Sediment Types Are Not Randomly Distributed in a River s Sediment

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. By Brett Lucas

Science EOG Review: Landforms

FLUVIAL LANDFORMS. Floodplains

RIVERS, GROUNDWATER, AND GLACIERS

CULTURAL HISTORY Suzzette Fig. 1. Undated Plat Map of Suzzette. Unsigned; probably drawn by J. Lee Chambers.

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Chapter 12: River Systems and Landforms

Physical landscapes River landscapes in the UK

ENVG/SC 10110L-20110L PLANET EARTH LABORATORY. Laboratory #9: Surface Hydrology & Map Scale

Figure 1. Which part of the river is labelled in Figure 1? a) Mouth b) Source c) Lower course d) channel

Study on the Fluvial Geomorphological Meanings of Valley Plain in the River and Estimation of the Extreme River Discharge

HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE

core mantle crust the center of the Earth the middle layer of the Earth made up of molten (melted) rock

Pat Dryer Half Moon Lake: A True Oxbow Lake? Geography 364 April 1 st, 2007

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

4.17 Spain. Catalonia

Waterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland

11/12/2014. Running Water. Introduction. Water on Earth. The Hydrologic Cycle. Fluid Flow

4. The map below shows a meandering stream. Points A, B, C, and D represent locations along the stream bottom.

PHASE 1 STUDIES UPDATE EROSION WORKING GROUP

mountain rivers fixed channel boundaries (bedrock banks and bed) high transport capacity low storage input output

Page 1. Name:

What is weathering and how does it change Earth s surface? Answer the question using

Domino Effect of River Training in Large Sand-Bed Braiding Rivers

Erosion. erosion OBJECTIVES SCHEDULE PREPARATION VOCABULARY MATERIALS. For the class. The students. For each student. For each team of four

River floodplain regime and stratigraphy. Drs. Nanette C. Kingma.

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Section 5. Low-Gradient Streams. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

Chapter 11. Rivers: Shaping our landscape

Sedimentation Rate Change in the Winooski River Delta

GY 111 Lecture Note Series Sedimentary Environments 2: Rivers and Deltas

Ch 10 Deposition Practice Questions

Overview of fluvial and geotechnical processes for TMDL assessment

Name: Which rock layers appear to be most resistant to weathering? A) A, C, and E B) B and D

Fluvial Systems Lab Environmental Geology Lab Dr. Johnson

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

The Effects of Hydraulic Structures on Streams Prone to Bank Erosion in an Intense Flood Event: A Case Study from Eastern Hokkaido

Lab 12 Coastal Geology

Module/Unit: Landforms Grade Level: Fifth

GY 111: Physical Geology

Historical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Fresh Water: Streams, Lakes Groundwater & Wetlands

GEL 109 Midterm W01, Page points total (1 point per minute is a good pace, but it is good to have time to recheck your answers!

HW #2 Landscape Travel from A to B 12,

Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans

Consequences of river regulation works: altered fluvial processes + increasing flood hazard

Morphology and Sedimentology of Panther Creek, Montgomery County Preserve

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

water erosion lithosphere Describe the process of erosion and deposition. chemical weathering Dissolving limestone is an example of.

GLG362/GLG598 Geomorphology K. Whipple October, 2009 I. Characteristics of Alluvial Channels

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

Teacher s Pack Key Stage 3 GEOGRAPHY

GY 402: Sedimentary Petrology

Fluvial Geomorphology

Chapter 3 Erosion and Deposition. The Big Question:

Illinois State Water Survey Division

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 200 TO 191 OF THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PHASE III REPORT

Erosion and Deposition

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

A floodplain is the flat land immediately surrounding a stream channel and innundated at 5mes of high flow.

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

Rivers. Regents Earth Science Weathering & Erosion

River/Stream Erosion Notes

1. Base your answer to the following question on the map below, which shows the generalized bedrock of a part of western New York State.

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

Transcription:

PR167 NARRATIVE Updated 25 July 2014 Cross section PR167 was established in 1977 in the upriver limb of a large meander bend of Powder River in Sections 21 and 28 of T6S, R50E (the bend described as near Daily Ranch by Gay et al., 1998, their Figure 9). Resurveys were conducted during the years 1978-1980, 1982, 1984-1998, 2011, and 2014. The large meander bend that includes section PR167 has been expanding at its crest at least since the arrival of homesteading settlers in this segment of Powder River valley more than a century ago (Martinson and Meade, 1983, sheet 2). During the great flood of 1923 (which was a larger flood than that of 1978), a house and artesian well on the left-bank terrace at the bend crest were undermined by the erosion of the bank. The bank erosion has continued (moving the left edge of the bend-crest channel at least 100 m leftward since 1923), such that the main channel of Powder River now flows to the left of the old artesian well, and the decapitated well continues to flow, at a rate of a few liters per minute, onto the point bar that has since formed on the inside of the meander bend (Meade and Moody, 2013, p. 25). The neck of the large meander bend that includes section PR167 has become progressively narrower, at least since 1939 (the date of the earliest known aerial photographs, which were used in the cartographic compilation by Martinson and Meade, 1983, sheet 2). This narrowing is most likely due to the progressive erosion of the inner banks of the bend (such as the bank erosion recorded since 1977 at section PR167). We cannot predict whether this bend will eventually be cut off by having its neck width reduced to zero by bank erosion (a neck cutoff) or by the upvalley growth of gullies that proceed by headcutting their ways across the neck (a chute cutoff). Headcutting gullies formed the cutoff channels at PR122A and PR141A during the 1978 floods, and several such gullies have already headcut themselves part way across the neck of the meander bend that includes section PR167 (Gay et al., 1998, their Figure 9). During the early years of our study, cross section PR 167 closely epitomized Luna Leopold s (1994, p. 5) generalization: A natural channel migrates laterally by erosion of one bank, maintaining on the average a constant channel cross section by deposition on the opposite bank. In other words, there is an equilibrium between erosion and deposition. The form of the cross section is stable, meaning more or less constant, but the position of the channel is not. This equilibrium between erosion and deposition was especially manifested at cross section PR167 during the 1978 flood (Meade and Moody, 2013, their Figure 6, second panel), when the 2-m-high right-bank Lightning terrace was eroded laterally some 26 m, displacing about 66 m³ of terrace material for each meter of channel length, while an equivalent quantity of new sediment was laid in lesser thicknesses of 0.2-0.6 m over a much wider section width (>100 m) onto the point bar, floodplain, and terrace on the left side of the channel. Since the early 1990s, however, the shape of the cross-channel profile of section PR167 has altered significantly as the volume of new material that was deposited and accumulated on (and in) the left side of the channel, not only exceeded somewhat the volume of material eroded from the right-side cutbank, but accumulated in such a way as to narrow the width of the lowwater channel of the river. The left bank of Powder River at cross section PR167, instead of being a gently-sloping surface as it was formerly, now has a levee (station 57-67), which is about 2 m above the sand bar along the left bank in 2014. The left bank is now stabilized (as of 2014) by a small but dense forest of Russian-olive trees that stand 3-4 m tall and extends from station

70 to station 10. From 1998 to 2014 under the Russian olives, no sand was deposited between stations 10 and 25 and about 0.03-0.05 m of sand was deposited between stations 25 and 57. Gay, G.R., Gay, H.H., Gay, W.H., Martinson, H.A., Meade, R.H., and Moody, J.A., 1994, Evolution of cutoffs across meander necks in Powder River, Montana, USA: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 23, p. 651-662. Leopold, L.B., 1994, A view of the river: Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 298 p. Martinson, H.A., and Meade, R.H., 1983, Channel changes of Powder River, 1938-78, Powder River County, Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA-661, 3 sheets. Meade, R.H., and Moody, J.A., 2013, Erosional and depositional changes wrought by the flood of May 1978 in the channels of Powder River, southeastern Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5035, 28 p., 1 plate.

PR167. Top. 13 July 1977. View upriver along the right bank. E. Meade (~1.6 m tall) is standing on the line of section. Bottom. 25 May 1978. View upriver of bend near John Daily s Ranch during the Flood of 1978. Approximate line of section is shown by the red line.

PR167. Top. 21 October 1979. View downriver. Left bank has seedlings of Russian olives brought in the Flood of 1978. Approximate location of the section is indicated by the red line. Bottom. 4 September 1991. View downriver from section. J. Moody (~1.9 m tall) is standing approximately on the line of section.

PR167. Top. 2 September 1993. View downriver. J. Pizzuto (~1.8 m tall) is on the line of section near station 60. Bottom. 2 September 1993. View downriver of new sand on point bar on left bank. J. Pizzuto is on the line of section near station 57. Red line indicates approximate location of section

PR167. Top. 16 July 2014. View downriver from the right bank. Red line indicates the approximate line of section. Bottom. 16 July 2014. View upriver from the right bank. Red line indicates the approximate line of section.

PR167. Top. 16 July 2014. Cross-channel view of the right bank. A metal pole with orange flagging is on the line of section. Red line indicates approximate location of section. Bottom. 16 July 2014. Cross-channel view of the left bank. Left-bank flood plain has a 60-m-wide thicket (from station 10 to station 70 that is approximately at the edge of the left bank) of 3-to-4-m-tall Russian olives, which have been trimmed along the line of section forming a narrow tunnel through the trees. Red line indicates approximate location of section.