Palm Frond Calculations

Similar documents
10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.

PANDUCT Type E Slotted Wall Wiring Duct

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK

CO~RSEOUTL..INE. revisedjune 1981 by G. Frech. of..a.pqij~t(..~ttsa.fidteconol.q.gy. Sault ",Ste'...:M~ri,e.: SAUl. ir.ft\,nl~t';~l' G ". E b:.

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS

Stress Transformation Equations: u = +135 (Fig. a) s x = 80 MPa s y = 0 t xy = 45 MPa. we obtain, cos u + t xy sin 2u. s x = s x + s y.

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).

I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

CR LAURENCE Z-SERIES GLASS CLAMPS (12/14/2012) Page 1 of Dec. 2012

Equilibrium in Three Dimensions

Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing

Trusted SECTION: POST COLUMBIA, PANELS. Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. Copyright 2015

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Innovative Products February 2016

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC

THREE HOLE SPLICE CLEVIS FOR B52 Standard finishes: ZN, GRN Wt./C 126 Lbs. (57.1 kg)

CIV 207 Winter For practice

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

Please review the following statement: I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

Structural Calculations For:

2. Rigid bar ABC supports a weight of W = 50 kn. Bar ABC is pinned at A and supported at B by rod (1). What is the axial force in rod (1)?

Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase

Name (Print) ME Mechanics of Materials Exam # 2 Date: March 29, 2017 Time: 8:00 10:00 PM - Location: WTHR 200

IDE 110 Mechanics of Materials Spring 2006 Final Examination FOR GRADING ONLY

Steel Post Load Analysis

CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

MEMS Project 2 Assignment. Design of a Shaft to Transmit Torque Between Two Pulleys

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

Experiment Five (5) Principal of Stress and Strain

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TYPICAL ANALYSIS - POLE LOCATION, ANTENNA SIZING AND SOILS PROPERTIES REQUIRED FOR SPECIFIC ANALYSIS.

World Shelters. U-Dome 200. Dome Shelter. Engineering Report: Dome Structure ER October South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA USA

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

Edward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608

API 11E - Specification for Pumping Units

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

: APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4021 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/ WEEK : 5 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 75 CREDIT : 5 TIME SCHEDULE

MET 487 Instrumentation and Automatic Controls. Lecture 13 Sensors

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate

ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

APPENDIX H: HMLT FATIGUE LIFE EVALUATION. (Proposed Specification Appendix) H-1

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

Feeney Architectural Products Design-Rail Glass Infill 09/09/2010 Page 1 of 51

EXTERIOR FRAMING EXTERIOR FRAMING

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180

1 of 12. Given: Law of Cosines: C. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G

ME 202 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS SPRING 2014 HOMEWORK 4 SOLUTIONS

Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002

Tuesday, February 11, Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE

RESEARCH PROJECT NO. 26

COURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4017 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/WEEK : 6 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 108 CREDITS : 5

POE Practice Test - Materials

ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS

Problem d d d B C E D. 0.8d. Additional lecturebook examples 29 ME 323

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

PROBLEM #1.1 (4 + 4 points, no partial credit)

Revision Term 2. Prof Ahmed Kovacevic

MECE 3321: Mechanics of Solids Chapter 6

SOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling.

Final Exam - Spring

FIS Specifications for Flex Poles (Edition May 2008) Original Text: German


The science of elasticity

Serviceability Deflection calculation

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT. WHISPER ft GUYED WIND TURBINE TEP # Revision 0 November 6, 2006 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT.

Principles of Finite Element for Design Engineers and Analysts. Ayman Shama, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

DNV DESIGN. POU_Rect - Design Report Page 1 of 11

db = 23.7 in B C D 96 k bf = 8.97 in tf = in k = 1.09 in 13 Fy = 50 ksi Fu = 65 ksi Member A-B, Interior column: A E

Tension zone applications, i.e., cable trays and strut, pipe supports, fire sprinklers Seismic and wind loading

Chapter 1 Introduction- Concept of Stress

The first NDS (1944) was based on allowable stress design (ASD). Copyright American Wood Council. All rights reserved.

By Dr. Mohammed Ramidh

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S

VACUUM SUPPORT FOR A LARGE INTERFEROMETRIC REFERENCE SURFACE

O.H. MODULE VACUUM LIFTING FIXTURE

Design of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. Example 10 - Sign

Technical Note PP TN Engineering Considerations for Temperature Change

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

Transcription:

Palm Frond Calculations 250 E. Broad Street Suite 500 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Paul J. Ford and Company Job # 33201-0014 Reference PJF Drawing # 33201-0014 Sheet S-3, Dated 02/06/2001

PAGE 1 OF 6 FORMULAS Gusted Wind Pressure = Gh qz = Gh [0.00256 Kz Vˆˆ2] (TIA/EIA 2.3.3 & 2.3.4) Gh = 1.69 (TIA/EIA 2.3.4.2) Kz = [z/33]ˆ(2/7) (TIA/EIA 2.3.3) Calculate design wind pressure at 33 ft. above grade. Therefore, Kz = 1.0. V = Design Wind Velocity (mph) TESTING COMPLETED BY INNOVATIVE SITE SOLUTIONS Innovative Site Solutions performed load testing of the palm fronds, and have provided the results to Paul J. Ford and Company. The palm fronds were tested to determine the applied wind force at various wind velocities. The wind load was measured by a strain gauge placed at a distance (38") from the pivot point. The resulting wind force on the palm frond is calculated from statics. Below is a free body diagram of the test model. TEST RESULTS Wind Velocity (mph) 50 60 70 80 Gage Tension Force Wind Into Frond Profile Wind Into Front Face of Frond (lbs) (lbs) 14 19 20 30 29 40 36 50

PAGE 2 OF 6 CALCULATION OF WIND FORCE Resolve moment about pivot point to obtain wind force Sum of moment about pivot = 0 = (51" * Wind Force) - (38" * Tension Gage Force) Wind Force = 38" * Tension Gage Force 51" Wind Velocity Gage Tension / Profile Wind Force / Profile Gage Tension / Face Wind Force / Face (mph) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) (lbs) 50 14 10.43 19 14.16 60 20 14.90 30 22.35 70 29 21.61 40 29.80 80 36 26.82 50 37.25 CALCULATION OF FACTORED PROJECTED AREA Factored Wind Area = CaA = Tested Wind Force Gusted Wind Pressure (Gh * qz) Wind Velocity Gh Gh * qz Wind Force / Profile CaA / Profile (mph) psf (lbs) (square feet, sf) 50 1.69 10.82 10.43 0.96 60 1.69 15.58 14.90 0.96 70 1.69 21.20 21.61 1.02 80 1.69 27.69 26.82 0.97 0.98 Average of CaA Wind Velocity Gh Gh * qz Wind Force / Profile CaA / Profile (mph) psf (lbs) (square feet, sf) 50 1.69 10.82 14.16 1.31 60 1.69 15.58 22.35 1.44 70 1.69 21.20 29.80 1.41 80 1.69 27.69 37.25 1.35 1.37 Average of CaA Since palm fronds will be mounted in the profile view, the CaA used for pole calculations could be 1.0 square feet. Due to dynamic and cyclical nature of wind, use a CaA of 1.3 square feet.

PAGE 3 OF 6 ANTENNA AND PALM FROND AREA Gross Area of Antennas, T-Arms and Palm Frond = Area of 17-ft diameter circle = 227 Square Feet (SF) Total Front Area of Palm Fronds, Antennas and Platforms Area of Pam Fronds = (30) Palm Fronds @ 1.3 Square Feet = 39 SF (1/2 of Palm Fronds in front view, 1/2 in back view) Frontal Areas of 1-ft x 4-ft Panel Antennas = 4 x [ 1-ft x 4-ft x 1.4 ] = 22.4 SF (Shape factor, Cf = 1.4) Area of 12-ft T-Arm Mounts = (4-in / 12-in/ft) x 12-ft x 2 = 8 SF (T-Arm Mount is constructed of 4" square tube with a front face width of 12-ft) (Shape factor, Cf = 1.4) Total Frontal Area of Palm Fronds, Antennas and Platforms = 69.4 SF 69.4 Solidity Ratio of Total Frontal Area / Gross Area = = 0.31 227 Use a Solidity Ratio of 0.60 for calculating areas of palm fronds, to account for back areas of fronds Area of Palm Frond used in Pole Calculations Palm Frond Area = [ 60 palm fronds ] x 1.3 sf x [ Solidity Ratio = 0.60 ] 46.800 SF

PAGE 4 OF 6 PALM BRANCH CONNECTION TO CLAMP BRACKET Dead_Load := 7lb (Weight of Branch) Wind_Load := 50lb (Ref. Attached Test Data/ Calcs.) Branch_Length := 7.5 ft. Moment_Arm := 0.6 Branch_Length + 16in Moment_Arm := 5.833 ft Calculated Moment at the base of the Receiver Stubs M := (Wind_Load Moment_Arm) + (Dead_Load Moment_Arm) M = 332.5 ft lb Calculate Moment Capacity of Tube Tube is 1 1/2 x 1 1/2 x 0.188 x 24 long ASTM A500 Grade B (46 KSI) Tube Width = B Tube Depth = D Inside Tube Width = B1 Inside Tube Depth = D1 Wall Thickness = 0.188 in Thk := 0.188in B := 1.25IN D := 1.25IN Fy := 46ksi B1 := B - (2 Thk) D1 := D - (2 Thk)

PAGE 5 OF 6 CALCULATED SECTION MODULUS OF TUBE [(B D 3 ) - (B1 D1 3 )] Sx := Sx = 0.248 in 3 6 D Allowable Moment Capacity in Tube Momentallow := 0.6 Fy Sx 1.33 Momentallow := 757.775 ft lb The Allowable Moment in the Tube is greater than the Calculated Moment in the tube. Therefore, the bending stresses in the tube are okay. Check the 1/4 Fillet Weld Section Modulus of Weld = Sx W D 2 SxW := B D + SxW := 2.083in 2 3 Actual Force in the Weld = Fw M Fw := Fw = 1915.2 SxW lb in Allowable Force in the Weld 3 Fyw := 70ksi W := in 16 Fillet Weld size = W (in) Fw_allow := (0.3) (Fyw) (0.707) (W) (1.33) Fw_allow :3702.471 lb in The Allowable Force in the Weld is greater than the Calculated Force in the Weld. Therefore, the stresses in the weld are okay.

PAGE 6 OF 6 FORCES IN CLAMP PLATE Tension in Clamp Bolts from Wind Load (worst case) Wind_Load Moment_Arm 60 = 17500 ft lb Wind_Load Moment_Arm 60 1.5ft = 11666.667lb 1.5 ft is the distance from the center of the pole to the bolts (worst case). Bolt_Tensionw := Wind_Load Moment_Arm 60 1.5ft Bolt_Tensionw := 3888.889lb 3 3 bolts assumes that all the force is carried in tension (no bearing occurs on the pole shaft). This is very conservative. Tension in Clamp Bolts from Dead Load (worst case) Dead_Load Moment_Arm 60 = 2450 ft lb Dead_Load Moment_Arm 60 4in = 7350 lb 4 in is half the distance of the clamp height. Bolt_Tensiond := Bolt_Tensiond = 2450lb Dead_Load Moment_Arm 60 4in 3 3 bolts assumes that all the force is carried in tension in the top (3) bolts only (no bearing occurs on the pole shaft). This is very conservative. Combined_Tension := Bolt_Tensionw + Bolt_Tensiond Combined_Tension = 6338.889 lb Tension Capacity of a 3/4 Diameter A307 Bolt = 8800 lbs

Panel Components Impact ABS Finishing: SP-932 can be sawed, drilled, routed, punched and die-cut with conventional tooling. Painting, silk-screen, and other decorative techniques are easily done, and SP-932 can be joined to itself or other materials by adhesive or solvent bonding. Mechanical fastening with screws, rivets, etc. is often successful depending on specific end use. PHYSICAL PROPERTY SUMMARY Property Test Method Value Unit Specific Gravity ASTM D-792 1.05 g/cc Tensile Modulus ASTM D-638 290,000 psi Tensile Strength @ Yield ASTM D-638 4,500 psi Flexural Modulus ASTM D-790 310,000 psi Flexural Strength @ Yield ASTM D-790 8,000 psi Izon Impact ASTM D-256 (73 F) 6.0 ft-lbs/in (-40 F) 1.4 ft-lbs/in Falling Dart Impact ASTM D-3029 (73 F) 19 ft-lbs/in (-40 F) 8 ft-lbs/in Heat Deflection Temperature ASTM D-648 (264 pis, unannealed) 190 F Coefficient of Thermal Expansion ASTM D-696 5.3 x 10-5 in/in/ F Hardness ASTM D-785 105 Rockwell R Flammability UL Subject 94 HB.062 Gardner Gloss ASTM D-523 95 % These typical results are based on test procedures which are believed to be reliable. Due to variable conditions or methods of processing, NO GUARANTEES OR WARRANTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, nor any recommendations made to infringe on patents. Extruded Polystyrene Meets Cal. QUAL. STAND. REG. # CA-T064, BOCA 90-11, ICBO 2257, SBCCI 9161, ASTM C578, HUD UMB-71, NYC BSA 912-52-SM, UND LAB. INC. CLASSIFIED. SEE CLASSIFICATION CERTIFICATE D-369 Surface Burning Characteristics for STYROFOAM Brand Insulation Flame Spread 5(1) Smoke Developed 165(1) (1) These numerical flame spread and smoke ratings are not intended to reflect hazards presented by this material under actual fire conditions.