Appendix 1. The result of normality with Kolmogorov-Smirnov method and descriptive Kolmogorov-Smirnov(a) Tests of Normality Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. VISKO.83 7.(*).969 7.76 AW.3 7.63.913 7 KA. 7.82.97 7 5 JML_MO. 7.77.968 7.71 * This is a lower bound of the true significance. a Lilliefors Significance Correction Descriptives AW Statistic Std. Error Mean.875 8267 95% Confidence Lower Bound Interval for Mean Upper Bound.831.86399 KA 5% Trimmed Mean.878 Median.836 Variance 5 Std. Deviation.699 Minimum.75 Maximum.95 Range. Interquartile Range.13 Skewness.156.287 Kurtosis -1.8.566 Mean 1.31825.91299 95% Confidence Lower Bound Interval for Mean Upper Bound.33813 2.29836 5% Trimmed Mean 1.232635 Median.7325 Variance.896 Std. Deviation.152 Minimum 35.12 Maximum 9.567 Range 1.583 Interquartile Range 7.325 Skewness.33.287 Kurtosis -1.83.566 35
VISKO Mean 63.571.882 95% Confidence Lower Bound Interval for Mean 31.352 Upper Bound 95.777 5% Trimmed Mean 63.8889 Median 5 Variance 18.596 Std. Deviation 13.776 Minimum Maximum 7 Range 5 Interquartile Range Skewness.71.287 Kurtosis -.799.566 JML_MO Mean.98.18991 95% Confidence Lower Bound Interval for Mean.5691 Upper Bound 5.3269 5% Trimmed Mean.89 Median.26 Variance 2.525 Std. Deviation 1.58888 Minimum 3 Maximum 9. Range 6. Interquartile Range 1.95 Skewness 1.29.287 Kurtosis.159.566 36
1 Appendix 2. The result of chemical water activity analysis Univariate Analysis of Variance Between-Subjects Factors Value Label N Kons_Jahe 1 % 1 2.5% 1 3 1 1 1.5% 1 5 2% 1 Umur_sim 1 2 3 5 6 Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: AW Kon_Jahe Umur_sim Mean Std. Deviation N %.76 5657 2 1.789 2828 2 2.828 23 2 3.858 23 2.899 23 2 5.9385 2121 2 6.95 2828 2.8679.7237 1.5%.76 5657 2 1.7865 2121 2 2.8215 3536 2 3.863 2828 2.8925 95 2 5.9355 3536 2 6.95 2828 2.85857.7129 1 1.7555 2121 2 1.7775 2121 2 2.8115 3536 2
2 1.5% 2% 3.836 11 2.88 2828 2 5.9275 3536 2 6.995 2121 2.8821.7899 1.75 11 2 1.769 2828 2 2.815 95 2 3.827 23 2.868 23 2 5.919 11 2 6.97 11 2.836.71386 1.75 2 1.765 11 2 2.7935 9192 2 3.895 3536 2.8 5657 2 5.985 2121 2 6.9385 2121 2.82957.68528 1.7555 553 1.777.58 2.811.13919 3.8387.22.8763.21536 5.9258.11755 6.976 5.875.699 7 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: AW Type III Sum of Mean Source Squares df Square F Sig. Corrected Model.33(a) 3. 719.711 Intercept 373219 5.278 1 5.278.83 Kon_Jahe 9 2 17.65 Umur_Sim 3928.9.318 6.53 7 Kon_Jahe * Umur_sim 3 2 8.365 Error 35 1.37E-5 5.68 7 Corrected.33 69 a R Squared =.999 (Adjusted R Squared =.997)
3 Estimated Marginal Means Grand Mean Dependent Variable: AW 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound.88.87.88 Post Hoc Tests Homogeneous Subsets Duncan a,b 2% 1.5% 1.5% % Sig. AW N 1 2 3 1.82957 1.836 Subset 1.8821 1.85857 1.8679.119 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1.37E-5. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b. Alpha =.5.
Homogeneous Subsets Duncan a,b 1 2 3 5 6 Sig. AW N 1 2 3 5 6 7.7555.777.811.8387.8763.9258.976 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1.37E-5. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b. Alpha =.5. Subset
Appendix 3. The result of chemical (moisture content) analysis Univariate Analysis of Variance Between-Subjects Factors 1 2 3 5 1 2 3 5 6 Value Label N % 1.5% 1 1 1 1.5% 1 2% 1
Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: KA %.5% 1 1.5% 2% 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 Mean Std. Deviation N 36.6993 8853 2 38.6595.15856 2.3355.9538 2 2.5575.1177333 2 5.5585.386 2 6.5.291823 2 9.3975.236887 2 2.83.3877 1 36.33175.215668 2 38.2585.231296 2 39.7813 3391 2 1.27795.899 2.5983.3221 2 6.37.111723 2 8.1915 5333 2 2.125129.2293897 1 36.63935.271711 2 38.888.1115815 2 39.7385.622 2 1.582325.8529 2 3.222725.86 2 6.33525.6877 2 8.5333.26337 2 2.12639.712753 1 35.229 2 36.9 2 37.6 2 39.18 2.8279 2.2925 2 5.6326 2 39.93631 3.7237152 1 35.76.9783 2 36.33925.1763 2 37.59875.768625 2 38.5675.125158 2.7325.2655 2 3.9683.562857 2.873.125922 2 39.5855 3.671356 1 35.989.752362 37.8585 1.537958 38.9772 1.2655.633235 1.59931 2.982125 2.627117 5.515 1.5327 7.32528 1.858 1.31825.152 7
Dependent Variable: KA Source Corrected Model Intercept * Error Corrected Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 15.368 a 3 3.276 25.6 11953.8 1 11953.8 8871369 118.6 29.552 2193.758 31.57 6 171.99 12761.73 15.75 2.65 8.579.71 35.13 1669.656 7 15.8 69 a. R Squared = (Adjusted R Squared =.999) Estimated Marginal Means Dependent Variable: KA Grand Mean 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound 1.318.1 1.29 1.36 Post Hoc Tests Homogeneous Subsets Duncan a,b 2% 1.5%.5% 1 % Sig. KA N 1 2 3 1 39.5855 1 39.93631 Subset 1 2.125129 1 2.12639 1 2.83.692 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) =.13. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b. Alpha =.5.
Homogeneous Subsets Duncan a,b 1 2 3 5 6 Sig. KA N 1 2 3 5 6 7 35.989 37.8585 38.9772.633235 2.982125 5.515 7.32528 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) =.13. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b. Alpha =.5. Subset
Appendix. The result of physical analysis Univariate Analysis of Variance Between-Subjects Factors 1 2 3 5 1 2 3 5 6 Value Label N % 1.5% 1 1 1 1.5% 1 2% 1
Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: VISKO %.5% 1 1.5% 2% 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 Mean Std. Deviation N 675 35.3553 2 562.5 17.67767 2 5 2 5 2 375 35.3553 2 325 35.3553 2 237.5 17.67767 2 6.286 13.73358 1 675 35.3553 2 575 35.3553 2 525 35.3553 2 37.5 17.67767 2 37.5 17.67767 2 325 35.3553 2 212.5 17.67767 2 55.3571 15.37727 1 675 35.3553 2 55 7.768 2 55 2 25 35.3553 2 2 35 2 262.5 17.67767 2 58.9286 137.136 1 675 35.3553 2 575 35.3553 2 87.5 17.67767 2 5 2 12.5 17.67767 2 375 35.3553 2 287.5 17.67767 2 66.71 125.1 1 7 2 6 2 525 35.3553 2 512.5 17.67767 2 25 35.3553 2 375 35.3553 2 3 2 91.71 132.171 1 68 25.81989 572.5 3.2581 517.5 28.98755 55 3.9629 29.369 35 33.33333 26 35.762 63.571 13.776 7
Dependent Variable: VISKO Source Corrected Model Intercept * Error Corrected Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 122682.13 a 3 3673 6.979 152892.9 1 152892.86 1959.7 35.71 8.929 5.221 2 1188982.13 6 1983.69 258.7 2.286 2 89.35 1.5.33 26875 35 767.857 29625. 7 1253357.13 69 a. R Squared =.979 (Adjusted R Squared =.958) Estimated Marginal Means Grand Mean Dependent Variable: VISKO 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound 63.571 3.312 56.88 7.295 Post Hoc Tests Homogeneous Subsets Duncan a,b %.5% 1 1.5% 2% Sig. VISKO N 1 2 1 6.286 1 55.3571 1 58.9286 1 66.71 Subset 1 91.71.9 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 767.857. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b. Alpha =.5.
Homogeneous Subsets Duncan a,b 6 5 3 2 1 Sig. VISKO N 1 2 3 5 6 7 26 35 55 517.5 572.5 68 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 767.857. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b. Alpha =.5. Subset
Appendix 5. The result of microbiological analysis Univariate Analysis of Variance Between-Subjects Factors 1 2 3 5 1 2 3 5 6 Value Label N % 1.5% 1 1 1 1.5% 1 2% 1 Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: JML_MO Mean Std. Deviation N % 3.985.2121 2 1.15.2121 2 2.26.2828 2 3 5.27.11 2 5.88.885 2 5 7.25.2121 2 6 9.75.3536 2 5.7 1.853 1.5% 3.86.11 2 1..11 2 2..2828 2 3.765.57 2 5.285.95 2 5 7.3.885 2 6 8.25.27577 2 5.7 1.78 1 1 3.55.5657 2 1 3.65.3777 2 2.95 77 2 3.28.885 2 5.55.2121 2 5 5.37.11 2 6 7.285.3536 2.786 1.26375 1 1.5% 3 2 1 3.55.3536 2 2 3.835.95 2 3.95 77 2
2%.8.29698 2 5 5.25 77 2 6 7.29.23 2.557 1.372 1 3 2 1 3 2 2 3.57.23 2 3 3.99.11 2.26.2828 2 5 5..19799 2 6 7.5.636 2.35 1.3993 1 3.79.3895 1 3.663.17 2 3.98.265 3.8.5352 5.58.57253 5 6.136 1.11531 6 7.836.8266.98 1.58888 7 Dependent Variable: JML_MO Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 173.57(a) 3 5.3 26.62 Intercept 1713.789 1 1713.789 87336.379 * 6.9 2.259 13.185.83 5.21 255.862 17.215 6 2.536 125.37 Error.687 35. 1887.983 7 Corrected 17.19 69 a R Squared =.996 (Adjusted R Squared =.992) Estimated Marginal Means Dependent Variable: JML_MO Grand Mean 95% Confidence Interval Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound.98.17.91.982 Post Hoc Tests
Homogeneous Subsets JML_MO Duncan Subset N 1 2 3 5 2% 1.35 1.5% 1.557 1 1.786.5% 1 5.7 % 1 5.7 Sig. Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) =.. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b Alpha =.5.
Homogeneous Subsets JML_MO Duncan Subset N 1 2 3 5 6 7 3.79 1 3.663 2 3.98 3.8 5.58 5 6.136 6 7.836 Sig. Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares The error term is Mean Square(Error) =.. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =. b Alpha =.5.
Appendix 6. Questioner form Nama : Umur : Tanggal : (P/L) Berkaitan dengan penelitian yang saya lakukan tentang penambahan jahe pada produk selai, maka saya meminta bantuan saudara/i untuk mengisi kuesioner dibawah ini. Dan saya mengucapkan terima kasih atas kesediaan saudara/i mengisi kuesioner tersebut. Kuesioner Mohon mengisi tabel dibawah ini yang sesuai menurut anda, setelah sampel selai diberikan. Sampel Rasa Tekstur Warna Aroma Overall 121 26 357 68 567 Kriteria pengisian nilai: 1. sangat suka 2. suka 3. kurang suka. tidak suka 5. sangat tidak suka TERIMA KASIH Appendix 7. The result of sensory analysis
Table 7. Organoleptic analysis Percentage the addition of ginger on pumpkin jam Parameter Acceptance scale %.5% 1% 1.5% 2% Taste Very like Like Less like Unlike Very unlike 28 8 8 32 2 8 28 2 32 2 28 2 score 2 26 252 272 336 Texture Very like Like Less like Unlike Very unlike 28 8 8 56 12 52 36 8 52 2 28 28 score 212 22 28 3 Color Very like Like Less like Unlike Very unlike 12 8 68 8 2 56 32 2 8 28 score 176 276 Aroma Very like Like Less like Unlike Very unlike 8 56 12 36 28 2 12 2 12 28 28 12 score 28 268 2 3 Overall Very like Like Less like Unlike Very unlike 12 56 8 12 36 32 8 2 32 32 score Overall of score 236 118 2 118 228 118 26 13 356 1732 The example of calculation sensory analysis (taste of ginger %): score = (x %x1)+(11x %x2)+(x %x3)+(11x %x)+(x %x5) 25 25 25 25 25 = 2
Appendix 8. The result of correlations factor Correlations Correlations AW KA VISKO JML_MO AW KA VISKO JML_MO Pearson Correlation 1 -.6 -.299(*).6 -.332(**) Sig. (2-tailed)..9.12.38 5 N 7 7 7 7 7 7 Pearson Correlation 1.976(**).935(**) -.968(**).86(**) Sig. (2-tailed). N 7 7 7 7 7 7 Pearson Correlation -.6.976(**) 1.97(**) -.95(**).99(**) Sig. (2-tailed).9. N 7 7 7 7 7 7 Pearson Correlation -.299(*).935(**).97(**) 1 -.93(**).926(**) Sig. (2-tailed).12. N 7 7 7 7 7 7 Pearson Correlation.6 -.968(**) -.95(**) -.93(**) 1 -.87(**) Sig. (2-tailed).38. N 7 7 7 7 7 7 Pearson Correlation -.332(**).86(**).99(**).926(**) -.87(**) 1 Sig. (2-tailed) 5. N 7 7 7 7 7 7 * Correlation is significant at the.5 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the.1 level (2-tailed).