Difference in two or more average scores in different groups

Similar documents
4/22/2010. Test 3 Review ANOVA

Comparing Several Means: ANOVA

Independent Samples ANOVA

Note: k = the # of conditions n = # of data points in a condition N = total # of data points

OHSU OGI Class ECE-580-DOE :Design of Experiments Steve Brainerd

Multiple t Tests. Introduction to Analysis of Variance. Experiments with More than 2 Conditions

One-Way ANOVA Source Table J - 1 SS B / J - 1 MS B /MS W. Pairwise Post-Hoc Comparisons of Means

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

10/31/2012. One-Way ANOVA F-test

Factorial Independent Samples ANOVA

The One-Way Repeated-Measures ANOVA. (For Within-Subjects Designs)

ANOVA Analysis of Variance

One-way between-subjects ANOVA. Comparing three or more independent means

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Multiple Regression. More Hypothesis Testing. More Hypothesis Testing The big question: What we really want to know: What we actually know: We know:

Introduction to the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

" M A #M B. Standard deviation of the population (Greek lowercase letter sigma) σ 2

The t-test: A z-score for a sample mean tells us where in the distribution the particular mean lies

One-way between-subjects ANOVA. Comparing three or more independent means

Summary of Chapter 7 (Sections ) and Chapter 8 (Section 8.1)

PSYC 331 STATISTICS FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS

Analysis of Variance: Repeated measures

Introduction to Analysis of Variance. Chapter 11

Review. One-way ANOVA, I. What s coming up. Multiple comparisons

Two-Way ANOVA. Chapter 15

The One-Way Independent-Samples ANOVA. (For Between-Subjects Designs)

Sampling distribution of t. 2. Sampling distribution of t. 3. Example: Gas mileage investigation. II. Inferential Statistics (8) t =

Extensions of One-Way ANOVA.

Extensions of One-Way ANOVA.

Chapter 9: How can I tell if scores differ between three or more groups? One-way independent measures ANOVA.

An Old Research Question

Using SPSS for One Way Analysis of Variance

Introduction to Business Statistics QM 220 Chapter 12

Analysis of Variance: Part 1

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variances a

N J SS W /df W N - 1

8/23/2018. One-Way ANOVA F-test. 1. Situation/hypotheses. 2. Test statistic. 3.Distribution. 4. Assumptions

The legacy of Sir Ronald A. Fisher. Fisher s three fundamental principles: local control, replication, and randomization.

A discussion on multiple regression models

Introduction to the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Computing One-Way Independent Measures (Between Subjects) ANOVAs

Formula for the t-test

Chapter Seven: Multi-Sample Methods 1/52

What If There Are More Than. Two Factor Levels?

Review of Multiple Regression

Power Analysis. Introduction to Power

Confidence Intervals, Testing and ANOVA Summary

ANOVA continued. Chapter 10

Analysis of variance

Inferences for Regression

Preview from Notesale.co.uk Page 3 of 63

4:3 LEC - PLANNED COMPARISONS AND REGRESSION ANALYSES

One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Paul K. Strode, Ph.D.

An inferential procedure to use sample data to understand a population Procedures

(ii) Scan your answer sheets INTO ONE FILE only, and submit it in the drop-box.

School of Mathematical Sciences. Question 1

PSY 216. Assignment 12 Answers. Explain why the F-ratio is expected to be near 1.00 when the null hypothesis is true.

ANOVA continued. Chapter 11

COMPARING SEVERAL MEANS: ANOVA

Sampling Distributions: Central Limit Theorem

ANOVA continued. Chapter 10

One-Way ANOVA Cohen Chapter 12 EDUC/PSY 6600

Two Factor Completely Between Subjects Analysis of Variance. 2/12/01 Two-Factor ANOVA, Between Subjects 1

Single Sample Means. SOCY601 Alan Neustadtl

Design of Engineering Experiments Part 2 Basic Statistical Concepts Simple comparative experiments

Regression: Main Ideas Setting: Quantitative outcome with a quantitative explanatory variable. Example, cont.

What Does the F-Ratio Tell Us?

SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS. Business Statistics

PSY 307 Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Chapter 20 Tests for Ranked Data, Choosing Statistical Tests

Area1 Scaled Score (NAPLEX) .535 ** **.000 N. Sig. (2-tailed)

ANALYTICAL COMPARISONS AMONG TREATMENT MEANS (CHAPTER 4)

In Class Review Exercises Vartanian: SW 540

PSY 216. Assignment 9 Answers. Under what circumstances is a t statistic used instead of a z-score for a hypothesis test

MANOVA is an extension of the univariate ANOVA as it involves more than one Dependent Variable (DV). The following are assumptions for using MANOVA:

CIVL /8904 T R A F F I C F L O W T H E O R Y L E C T U R E - 8

Prepared by: Prof. Dr Bahaman Abu Samah Department of Professional Development and Continuing Education Faculty of Educational Studies Universiti

36-309/749 Experimental Design for Behavioral and Social Sciences. Sep. 22, 2015 Lecture 4: Linear Regression

DETAILED CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. 1. Introduction to Statistics

Multiple Comparisons

One-Way ANOVA. Some examples of when ANOVA would be appropriate include:

HYPOTHESIS TESTING. Hypothesis Testing

Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320

Statistics Primer. ORC Staff: Jayme Palka Peter Boedeker Marcus Fagan Trey Dejong

Correlation. A statistics method to measure the relationship between two variables. Three characteristics

The t-statistic. Student s t Test

BIOL Biometry LAB 6 - SINGLE FACTOR ANOVA and MULTIPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURES

Design of Experiments. Factorial experiments require a lot of resources

Lecture 11: Two Way Analysis of Variance

PLSC PRACTICE TEST ONE

Dr. Junchao Xia Center of Biophysics and Computational Biology. Fall /1/2016 1/46

Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance

Workshop Research Methods and Statistical Analysis

ANOVA Situation The F Statistic Multiple Comparisons. 1-Way ANOVA MATH 143. Department of Mathematics and Statistics Calvin College

Factorial Analysis of Variance

Power Analysis using GPower 3.1

Chapter 10. Design of Experiments and Analysis of Variance

2 and F Distributions. Barrow, Statistics for Economics, Accounting and Business Studies, 4 th edition Pearson Education Limited 2006

PSY 305. Module 3. Page Title. Introduction to Hypothesis Testing Z-tests. Five steps in hypothesis testing

Simple Linear Regression

Chapter 4. Regression Models. Learning Objectives

STATS Analysis of variance: ANOVA

Transcription:

ANOVAs Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Difference in two or more average scores in different groups Each participant tested once Same outcome tested in each group Simplest is one-way ANOVA (one variable as predictor); but can include multiple predictors 1

Differences between the two groups are separated into two sources of variance Variance from within the group Variance from between the groups The variance between groups is typically of interest Factor: the variable that designates the groups to be compared Levels: the individual comparable parts of the IV Between vs. within Factorial designs have more than one variable as a predictor of an outcome 2

F is based on variance, not mean differences Partial out the between condition variance from the within condition variance F = MS between MS within MS between = SS between /df between MS within = SS within /df within 3

Total Variability Between-treatments variance Within-treatments variance Measures differences due to 1. Treatment effects 2. Chance Measures differences due to 1. Natural variability 1. State hypotheses Null hypothesis: there is no effect of treatment on spider phobia OR mean spider phobia does not differ among the three treatment groups Mean T1 = Mean T2 = Mean T3 Research hypothesis: at least one mean spider phobia differs among the three treatment groups OR there is an effect of at least one treatment on spider phobia Mean T1 Mean T2 Mean T1 Mean T3 Mean T2 Mean T3 Mean T1 Mean T2 Mean T3 4

Need to calculate 3 SOS scores Between ee subjects SOS Within subjects SOS Total SOS (sum of between & within group SOS) SS = Σ(ΣX) 2 /n (ΣΣX) 2 between ( ) /N ΣX = sum of scores in each group ΣΣX = sum of all the scores across groups n = number of participants in each group N = number of participants (total) 5

SS = ΣΣ(X 2 Σ(ΣX) 2 within ( ) ( ) /n ΣΣ(X 2 ) = sum of all the sums of squared scores Σ(ΣX) 2 = sum of the sum of each group s scores squared n = number of participants p in each group Ss = ΣΣ(X 2 (ΣΣX) 2 total ( ) /N ΣΣ(X 2 ) = sum of all the sums of squared scores (ΣΣX) 2 = sum of all the scores across groups squared N = total number of participants p (in all groups) 6

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Score X 2 1 Score X 2 2 Score X 2 3 5 25 3 9 1 1 2 4 3 9 0 0 5 25 0 0 1 1 4 16 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 1 1 n 5 5 5 N = 15 ΣX 18 10 5 ΣΣX=33 X 3.6 2 1 (ΣΣX) 2 =1089 Σ(X 2 ) 74 26 7 ΣΣ(X 2 ) = 107 (ΣX 2 )/ n 324/5 64.8 100/5 20 25/5 5 Σ(ΣX 2 )/n = 89.8 F = MS between MS within MS between = SS between /df between Df between = k-1 (k=# of groups) = MS within = SS within /df within Df within = N-k (N=sample size) = 7

5. Determine the critical value for rejection of the null Look at table in book or other place (p. 336) At critical value at p <.05 is 6. Determine whether the statistic exceeds the critical value 7. If over the critical value, reject the null & conclude that there is a significant difference between at least one of the means 8

For an ANOVA, the test statistic only tells you that there is a difference It does not tell you which groups were different from other groups There are numerous post-hoc tests that you can use to tell the difference (that correct for increased Type I error rates) Here, we will use t-tests because they are already familiar In results There was a significant effect of type of treatment on spider phobia, F(2,12) = 6.01, p <.05. Participants who received treatment X 3 were less afraid of spiders (M = 1.00, SD = 0.71) than participants who received treatment X 1 (M = 3.60, SD = 1.52), t(8) = 3.47, p =.008, but did not differ from participants who received treatment X 2 (M = 2.00, SD = 1.22, t(8) = 1.58, n.s. Participants who received treatments X 1 and X 2 did not significantly differ, t(8) = 1.84, n.s. If it had not been significant: There was no significant effect of type of treatment on spider phobia, F(2,12) = 2.22, n.s. 9

Between Groups Within Groups Sum of Mean Squares df Square F Sig. 17.200 2 8.600 6.000.016 17.200 12 1.433 Total 34.400 14 Type III Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 17.200(a) 2 8.600 6.000.016 Intercept cond Error Total Corrected Total 72.600 1 72.600 50.651.000 17.200 2 8.600 6.000.016 17.200 12 1.433 107.000 15 34.400 14 10