Crustose algae communities on Baltic infralittoral rock and mixed substrata

Similar documents
Annual algae communities on Baltic infralittoral coarse sediment

Unvegetated epifaunal communities on Baltic infralittoral coarse sediment

Infaunal communities of Baltic upper circalittoral sand not dominated by bivalves

Infaunal communities in Baltic infralittoral muddy sediment not dominated by bivalves

HELCOM Red List Category: Previous HELCOM Red List threat assessments BSEP 75 (HELCOM 1998): BSEP 113 (HELCOM 2007): Greater concern stated by:

RED LIST OF EUROPEAN HABITATS. Marine Results Presentation 24 th May, 2016

Mapping of marine habitats in shallow coastal areas in Denmark

Eutrophication (H01.05), Contaminant pollution (H01.05), Contaminant pollution (H03),

A4.23 Communities on Atlantic soft circalittoral rock

Mapping of marine ecosystems and their services in the Bulgarian Black Sea region. Evaluation of current condition

Significant Ecological Marine Area Assessment Sheet

FINMARINET: Inventories and Planning for the Marine Natura 2000 Network in Finland. A.2 Geological inventories of the seafloor Final Report

FEAST (Feature Activity Sensitivity Tool)

Mapping ecosystem services provided by benthic habitats in the European Atlantic Ocean

Purpose of large scale mapping/inventories

A1.41: Communities of Atlantic littoral rockpools

Copernicus for Coastal Zone Monitoring and Management

Seabed Habitat Classification Issues Jacques Populus - Ifremer - Brest

A2.5a Arctic coastal salt marsh

Habitat Mapping in The Hauraki Gulf Marine Park. Dan Breen

BIOTOPE INFORMATION SHEET

Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS)

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Memo of the on-line meeting of the HELCOM EN-Marine Litter (30 May 2017)

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan and Marine Spatial Planning

Theme 1, Working Group B: Conservation objectives for habitats Working Group reporting

Food for thoughts. Jon Davies MESH Project Coordinator

Motivations, principles and development of a pan-european approach to describe MPA network coherence in Europe s seas

Оценка и картиране и на морските екосистемни типове, състояние и услуги в Българските черноморски води общо представяне на проекта

HELCOM-VASAB Maritime Spatial Planning Working Group Twelfth Meeting Gdansk, Poland, February 2016

v=7tat9croynk&feature=youtu.be

BalticBOOST Appendix 1, WP 3.3 Deliverable 1 Final report 14 February 2017

Case Study: Bulgarian part of the Black Sea

Overall Category & Criteria. Red List Category Red List Criteria Red List Category Red List Criteria Least Concern

What standard are we focusing on today?

Confidence Assessment Scoring System

Cliff stabilisation. Adaptation Option Climate-ADAPT

American Harris mud crab Rhithropanopeus harrisii

Relatively little hard substrate occurs naturally in the

A Generic Coastal Erosion Hazard Zoning for Tasmania. Chris Sharples, Hannah Walford & Luke Roberts April 2014

A5.38x: Communities of Mediterranean circalittoral muddy detritic bottoms

Gulf of Finland Year 2014 An overview of activities and further visions

Belize. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Biotope classification of Swedish zoobenthos data for the Baltic EUNIS

"The Relationship Between Seagrass Cover and Species- richness of Invertebrates"

A new fauna intercalibration typology

Name Hour. Section 4-1 The Role of Climate (pages 87-89) What Is Climate? (page 87) 1. How is weather different from climate?

Cooperation for ecosystem based planning of the marine environment using GIS Project leader: Jens Perus

Marine Spatial Planning as an important tool for implementing the MSFD

Restoration efforts required for achieving the objectives of the Birds and Habitats Directives

Cook Islands. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Environmental Science

HELSINKI COMMISSION HELCOM MONAS 4/2002 Monitoring and Assessment Group Fourth Meeting Warnemünde, Germany, October 2002

Possibilities of LIDAR in the shallow waters of the Baltic Sea and it s application for habitat modeling

What Is Climate? (page 87) The Greenhouse Effect (page 87) Section 4-1 The Role of Climate (pages 87-89) Chapter 4 Ecosystems and Communities

Bringing together harmonized EUNIS seabed habitat geospatial information for the European Seas

Bahamas. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Ethiopia. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Identification of maritime spatial planning best practices in the Baltic Sea Region and other EU maritime regions

Carte des peuplements benthiques des substrats meubles de la baie de Saint-Brieuc (Source Thouzeau G., Hamon D., 1992) - Echelle 1/ Score sheet

Mali. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Vanuatu. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

Treasure Coast Science Scope and Sequence

Unit 2: Ecology. Big Idea...

Ecological mapping using satellite imagery: an Abu Dhabi case study Middle East Geospatial Forum 16 th February 2015

HydroSpatial II Practical application of INSPIRE in Marine Mapping Data

The Thresholds working Group.

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

Ghana. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Krešimir Žganec, doc. dr. sc. University of Zadar

Evolution and Life in the Ocean

Suriname. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

South Africa. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) in the Convention on Biological Diversity Arctic EBSA workshop as an example

Fiji. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

CHAPTER 6 & 7 VOCABULARY

NOTES: CH 4 Ecosystems & Communities

Modeling habitat suitability for the European green crab using the ShoreZone mapping system

The Baltic Sea Region Maritime Spatial Planning Data Expert Sub-group. First Report 2015/2016/

Equatorial Guinea. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

SEABED MAPPING. Selsey to Eastoke TR 65

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Tanzania. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

HELCOM work on development of Baltic MPA network

Data and data product catalogue. Preliminary version May 2018

THE RED BOOK OF PLANTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

Global reviews of wetland inventory, classification and delineation

Identifying species and ecosystem sensitivities. Appendix 9. Species biology and sensitivity key information pro forma. (September 1999 onwards)

WP4: COASTAL PROCESSES

Bio 112 Lecture Exam 1 Study Guide

Cameroon. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

Towards a global typological framework to support Red Listing of ecosystems. Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio Associate VP for Conservation and Health

EMODnet data. Flanders Marine Institute. Simon Claus. A. Giorgetti, D. Schaap, A. Novellino, A. Pititto, H.Lilis, V. Henry, T.

THE GULF COAST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT:

Cross walking to the New Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS)

Project Report. Irish Sea Reef Survey. On behalf of: National Parks and Wildlife Service Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government

Types of Wetlands. Tidal Systems

Subtidal permanently flooded with tidal water. Irregularly exposed surface exposed by tides less often than daily

Transcription:

European Red List of Habitats Marine: Baltic Habitat Group Crustose algae communities on Baltic infralittoral rock and mixed substrata Summary This benthic habitat is present throughout the Baltic where hard substrates are present and light levels enable the establishment of crustose algae communities. There are records of the characteristic species (Hildenbrandia spp. and Pseudolithoderma spp.) in all the Baltic sea subbasins but no estimates of habitat extent and area, nor reporting of potential quality indicators. Activities which reduce light levels or lead to eutrophication (nutrient enrichment) could result in some deterioration of this habitat but the of such effects are unknown. Any potential effects on this habitat from changes in sea temperature and salinity that may result from future climate change are also unknown. Synthesis This habitat is present in all subbasins of the Baltic and therefore the EOO exceeds 50,000 km. It is not considered to have declined significantly (>5%) over the last 50 years but the lack of quantitative data on extent, quality and trends over time means that accurate calculations of EOO and AOO are not possible at the present time. This Red List assessment has therefore been based on expert opinion. The overall assessment for this EUNIS level 4 habitat has been based on the HELCOM (013) assessments for the associated HELCOM HUB biotopes. Draft assessments were derived using a weighted approach whereby the HELCOM assessment outcomes were assigned a score. This was averaged across the relevant biotopes. The outcomes were reviewed by Baltic experts to reach a final conclusion. HELCOM (013) assessed the two associated Baltic biotopes (AA.A1R and AA.M1R) as Least Concern (based on criterion A1). With no additional information on changes in extent or quality of this habitat, the current expert opinion is an assessment of Least Concern for the EU 8 and EU 8+. Overall Category & Criteria EU 8 EU 8+ Red List Category Red List Criteria Red List Category Red List Criteria Least Concern Least Concern Subhabitat types that may require further examination None. Habitat Type Code and name Crustose algae communities on Baltic infralittoral rock and mixed substrata 1

Description No characteristic photographs of this habitat currently available. Habitat description This is a Baltic Sea benthic habitat in the photic zone, either with at least 90% coverage of rock, boulders or stones of more than 63 mm in diameter but also on mixed substrates with at least 10% coverage of rock, boulders or stones according to the HELCOM HUB classification. Soft crustose algae cover at least 10% of the seabed while all perennial attached erect groups cover less than 10%. This habitat covers the full salinity range of the Baltic Sea and is more common in areas exposed to waves and current. Indicators of quality: Both biotic and abiotic indicators have been used to describe marine habitat quality. These include: the presence of characteristic species as well as those which are sensitive to the pressures the habitat may face; water quality parameters; levels of exposure to particular pressure, and more integrated indices which describe habitat structure and function, such as trophic index, or successional stages of development in habitats that have a natural cycle of change over time. There are no commonly agreed indicators of quality for this habitat, although particular parameters may have been set in certain situations e.g. protected features within Natura 000 sites, where reference values have been determined and applied on a locationspecific basis. Characteristic species: These include Hildenbrandia spp., Pseudolithoderma spp. with different species present depending on the salinity regime. Classification EUNIS: The closest correspondence in EUNIS (004) level 4 is A3.4 Baltic exposed infralittoral rock, A3.5 Baltic moderately exposed infralittoral rock and A3.6 Baltic sheltered infralittoral rock. Annex 1: The relationship between HUB biotopes and Annex 1 habitats has not yet been mapped by HELCOM,

however this habitat may occur in the following Annex 1 habitats: 1160 Large shallow inlets and bays 1170 Reefs 1650 Boreal Baltic narrow inlets MAES: Marine Marine inlets and transitional waters Marine Coastal MSFD: Shallow sublittoral rock and biogenic reef Shallow sublittoral mixed sediment EUSeaMap: Shallow photic rock or biogenic reef Shallow coarse or mixed sediments IUCN ecosystem: 9. Subtidal rock and rocky reefs 9.3. Subtidal Loose Rock/Pebble/Gravel Other relationships: Level 5 of the HELCOM HUB classification (013): AA.A1R Baltic photic rock and boulder characterized by soft crustose algae AA.M1R Baltic photic mixed substrate characterized by soft crustose algae Does the habitat type present an outstanding example of typical characteristics of one or more biogeographic regions? Justification Geographic occurrence and trends Region Present or Presence Uncertain Current area of habitat Recent trend in quantity (last 50 yrs) Recent trend in quality (last 50 yrs) 3

Region Present or Presence Uncertain Baltic Proper: Present Belt Sea: Present Gulf of Bothnia: Present Baltic Sea Gulf of Finland: Present Gulf of Riga: Present The Sound: Present Current area of habitat Recent trend in quantity (last 50 yrs) Recent trend in quality (last 50 yrs) Km of Occurrence, Area of Occupancy and habitat area of Occurrence (EOO) EU 8 EU 8+ >50,000 Km >50,000 Km Area of Occupancy (AOO) Current estimated Total Area Km Km Comment This habitat is present in all the Baltic subbasins however there is insufficient information for accurate calculation of EOO and AOO. This habitat is present in all the Baltic subbasins however there is insufficient information for accurate calculation of EOO and AOO. Distribution map There are insufficient data to provide a comprehensive and accurate map of the distribution of this habitat. This map has therefore been generated using the modelled data available on EMODnet for EUNIS level 3 habitats in the Baltic Sea (EMODnet, 010). This means it indicates potential areas in which this habitat may occur, not the actual distribution of this EUNIS level 4 habitat. EOO and AOO cannot be calculated at 4

the present time, although the habitat is known to occur in all the Baltic Sea subbasins. How much of the current distribution of the habitat type lies within the EU 8? This habitat occurs in the EU 8+ (Russia). The percentage hosted by EU 8 is therefore less than 100% but there is insufficient information to establish the proportion. Trends in quantity Average current trend in quantity (extent) EU 8: EU 8+: Does the habitat type have a small natural range following regression? No Justification This habitat occurs in all the Baltic subbasins therefore does not have a small natural range. Does the habitat have a small natural range by reason of its intrinsically restricted area? No Justification This habitat occurs in all the Baltic subbasins therefore does not have a small natural range. Trends in quality Average current trend in quality EU 8: EU 8+: Pressures and threats No pressures and threats specific to this habitat type have been identified. List of pressures and threats Conservation and management Crustose algae are generally very tolerant to extremes of temperature, light and salinity.this habitat is likely to benefit from measures which reduce the risk of eutrophication (nutrient enrichment) and which maintain water clarity. List of conservation and management needs Measures related to wetland, freshwater and coastal habitats Restoring/Improving water quality Conservation status Annex 1: 1160: MBAL U 1170: MBAL U1 5

1650: MBAL U HELCOM (013) assessments: 1160: VU C1 1170: VU C1 1650: VU C1 HELCOM has assessed the associated biotopes AA.A1R and AA.M1R as LC(A1) When severely damaged, does the habitat retain the capacity to recover its typical character and functionality? Effort required Red List Assessment Criterion A: Reduction in quantity Criterion A A1 Aa Ab A3 EU 8 <5 % % % % EU 8+ <5 % % % % There are no quantitative data on trends in the area covered by this habitat type in the Baltic but expert opinion is that there has been less than a 5% decline over the last 50 years. This habitat has therefore been assessed as Least Concern under Criteria A. Criterion B: Restricted geographic distribution Criterion B B1 EOO a B b c AOO a b B3 c EU 8 >50,000 Km unknown unknown unknown unknown EU 8+ >50,000 Km unknown unknown unknown unknown Present in all Baltic Sea basins therefore EOO exceeds 50,000km however with no quantitative data on habitat extent or area, accurate calculation of EOO or AOO is not possible at the present time. This habitat has therefore been assessed as Data Deficient under criterion B. Criterion C and D: Reduction in abiotic and/or biotic quality Criteria C/D C/D1 C/D C/D3 EU 8 % % EU 8+ 6

C1 Criterion C C C3 EU 8 EU 8+ D1 Criterion D D D3 EU 8 EU 8+ Experts consider there to be insufficient data on which to assess criteria C/D. Criterion E: Quantitative analysis to evaluate risk of habitat collapse Criterion E Probability of collapse EU 8 unknown EU 8+ unknown There is no quantitative analysis available to estimate the probability of collapse of this habitat type. Overall assessment "Balance sheet" for EU 8 and EU 8+ A1 Aa Ab A3 B1 B B3 C/D1 C/D C/D3 C1 C C3 D1 D D3 E EU8 LC EU8+ LC Overall Category & Criteria EU 8 EU 8+ Red List Category Red List Criteria Red List Category Red List Criteria Least Concern Least Concern Confidence in the assessment Low (mainly based on uncertain or indirect information, inferred and suspected data values, and/or limited expert knowledge) Assessors S. Gubbay and N. Sanders. Contributors HELCOM RED LIST Biotope Expert Team 013 and Baltic Sea Working Group for the European Red List of Habitats 014 and 015. Reviewers T.A. Haynes. Date of assessment 0/07/015 Date of review 17/1/15 7

References HELCOM, 013. HELCOM Red List Biotope information sheets. Available at: http://www.helcom.fi/documents/ministerial013/associated%0documents/background/helcom%0red %0List%0Biotope%0Information%0Sheets%0(BIS).pdf. (Accessed: 16/07/015). HELCOM, 013. Red List of Baltic Sea underwater biotopes, habitats and biotope complexes. Avellan, L (Ed). Helsinki, Finland. 8