Geometric control and dynamical systems

Similar documents
A Kupka-Smale Theorem for Hamiltonian systems. systems from Mañé s viewpoint, a control approach. Ludovic Rifford PICOF 12

Mañé s Conjecture from the control viewpoint

Generic Aubry sets on surfaces

Franks Lemma for C 2 Mane Perturbations of Riemannian Metrics and Applications to Persistence

Regularity of solutions to Hamilton-Jacobi equations for Tonelli Hamiltonians

HAMILTONIAN ELLIPTIC DYNAMICS ON SYMPLECTIC 4-MANIFOLDS

Robustly transitive diffeomorphisms

Stability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

AMADEU DELSHAMS AND RAFAEL RAMíREZ-ROS

On the Hausdorff Dimension of the Mather Quotient

Aubry Mather Theory from a Topological Viewpoint

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

A FRANKS LEMMA FOR CONVEX PLANAR BILLIARDS

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

April 13, We now extend the structure of the horseshoe to more general kinds of invariant. x (v) λ n v.

Hamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic

LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY

Closing Aubry sets II

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

BACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MASLOV INDEX IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

MARKOV PARTITIONS FOR HYPERBOLIC SETS

Introduction to Continuous Dynamical Systems

1 )(y 0) {1}. Thus, the total count of points in (F 1 (y)) is equal to deg y0

SHADOWING ORBITS FOR TRANSITION CHAINS OF INVARIANT TORI ALTERNATING WITH BIRKHOFF ZONES OF INSTABILITY

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8

Stratification of 3 3 Matrices

A little taste of symplectic geometry

IV Canonical relations for other geometrical constructions

satisfying the following condition: If T : V V is any linear map, then µ(x 1,,X n )= det T µ(x 1,,X n ).

12 Geometric quantization

1 Introduction Definitons Markov... 2

Lecture 5. Numerical continuation of connecting orbits of iterated maps and ODEs. Yu.A. Kuznetsov (Utrecht University, NL)

Periodic Orbits of Weakly Exact Magnetic Flows

Differential Topology Solution Set #2

Solutions to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation as Lagrangian submanifolds

Morse Theory for Lagrange Multipliers

LECTURE NOTES ON MATHER S THEORY FOR LAGRANGIAN SYSTEMS

Persistence of homoclinic orbits for billiards and twist maps

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

The Structure of Hyperbolic Sets

Hyperbolic periodic orbits and Mather sets in certain symmetric cases

Nodal symplectic spheres in CP 2 with positive self intersection

A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 25 Nov 2016

Transversality. Abhishek Khetan. December 13, Basics 1. 2 The Transversality Theorem 1. 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

Essential hyperbolicity versus homoclinic bifurcations. Global dynamics beyond uniform hyperbolicity, Beijing 2009 Sylvain Crovisier - Enrique Pujals

THE POINCARE-HOPF THEOREM

Math 6455 Nov 1, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech

Hyperbolic Dynamics. Todd Fisher. Department of Mathematics University of Maryland, College Park. Hyperbolic Dynamics p.

Lecture Fish 3. Joel W. Fish. July 4, 2015

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Green bundles : a dynamical study

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

Chaotic transport through the solar system

HYPERBOLIC SETS WITH NONEMPTY INTERIOR

SOME REMARKS ON THE TOPOLOGY OF HYPERBOLIC ACTIONS OF R n ON n-manifolds

Master of Science in Advanced Mathematics and Mathematical Engineering

The centralizer of a C 1 generic diffeomorphism is trivial

On implicit Lagrangian differential systems

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 6 Apr 2011

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Convergence Rate of Nonlinear Switched Systems

MET Workshop: Exercises

On the dynamics of strongly tridiagonal competitive-cooperative system

3.2 Frobenius Theorem

Self-intersections of Closed Parametrized Minimal Surfaces in Generic Riemannian Manifolds

0.1 Complex Analogues 1

Dynamics of Group Actions and Minimal Sets

Rigidity of certain solvable actions on the torus

STABILITY OF PLANAR NONLINEAR SWITCHED SYSTEMS

1 Contact structures and Reeb vector fields

274 Microlocal Geometry, Lecture 2. David Nadler Notes by Qiaochu Yuan

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 6 Jun 2016

Geodesic Equivalence in sub-riemannian Geometry

EQUIVARIANT DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability

Abundance of stable ergodicity

A few words about the MTW tensor

Self-intersections of Closed Parametrized Minimal Surfaces in Generic Riemannian Manifolds

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 20 Feb 2017

27. Topological classification of complex linear foliations

The theory of manifolds Lecture 2

An integral lift of contact homology

THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM

Hamiltonian Dynamics

A generic property of families of Lagrangian systems

THE ASYMPTOTIC MASLOV INDEX AND ITS APPLICATIONS

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 11 Feb 2007

TRANSITIVITY OF FINSLER GEODESIC FLOWS IN COMPACT SURFACES WITHOUT CONJUGATE POINTS AND HIGHER GENUS

C 1 DENSITY OF AXIOM A FOR 1D DYNAMICS

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

Subgroups of Lie groups. Definition 0.7. A Lie subgroup of a Lie group G is a subgroup which is also a submanifold.

Transcription:

Université de Nice - Sophia Antipolis & Institut Universitaire de France 9th AIMS International Conference on Dynamical Systems, Differential Equations and Applications

Control of an inverted pendulum

Control systems A general control system has the form where x is the state in M u is the control in U ẋ = f (x, u)

Control systems A general control system has the form where x is the state in M u is the control in U ẋ = f (x, u) Proposition Under classical assumptions on the datas, for every x M and every measurable control u : [0, T ] U the Cauchy problem { ẋ(t) = f ( x(t), u(t) ) a.e. t [0, T ], x(0) = x admits a unique solution x( ) = x( ; x, u) : [0, T ] M.

Controllability issues Given two points x 1, x 2 in the state space M and T > 0, can we find a control u such that the solution of { ẋ(t) = f ( x(t), u(t) ) a.e. t [0, T ] x(0) = x 1 satisfies x(t ) = x 2?

Controllability issues Given two points x 1, x 2 in the state space M and T > 0, can we find a control u such that the solution of { ẋ(t) = f ( x(t), u(t) ) a.e. t [0, T ] x(0) = x 1 satisfies x(t ) = x 2? x 2 x 1

The Kupka-Smale Theorem for vector fields Theorem (Kupka 63, Smale 63) Let M be a smooth compact manifold. For C k (k 1) vector fields on M, the following properties are generic: 1. All closed orbits are hyperbolic. 2. Heteroclinic orbits are transversal, i.e. the intersections of stable and unstable manifolds of closed hyperbolic orbits are transversal.

Mañé generic Hamiltonians Let M be a smooth compact manifold and let T M be its cotangent bundle equipped with the canonical symplectic form. Let H : T M R be an Hamiltonian of class at least C 2 and X H be the associated Hamiltonian vector field which reads (in local coordinates) X H (x, p) = ( H p ) (x, p), H (x, p). x

Mañé generic Hamiltonians Let M be a smooth compact manifold and let T M be its cotangent bundle equipped with the canonical symplectic form. Let H : T M R be an Hamiltonian of class at least C 2 and X H be the associated Hamiltonian vector field which reads (in local coordinates) X H (x, p) = ( H p ) (x, p), H (x, p). x Definition Given an Hamiltonian H : T M R, a property is called C k Mañé generic if there is a residual set G in C k (M; R) such that the property holds for any H + V with V G.

Statement of the result Theorem (Rifford-Ruggiero 10) Let H : T M R be a Tonelli Hamiltonian of class C k with k 2. The following properties are C k Mañé generic: 1. Each closed orbit is either hyperbolic or no eigenvalue of the Poincaré transform of any closed orbit is a root of unity. 2. Heteroclinic orbits are trasnversal, i.e. the intersections of stable and unstable manifolds of closed hyperbolic orbits are transversal. Recall that H is Tonelli if it is superlinear and uniformly convex in the fibers.

The Poincaré map Let θ = ( x, p) be a periodic point for the Hamiltonian flow of positive period T > 0. Fix a local section Σ which is transversal to the flow at θ and contained in the energy level of θ.

The Poincaré map Let θ = ( x, p) be a periodic point for the Hamiltonian flow of positive period T > 0. Fix a local section Σ which is transversal to the flow at θ and contained in the energy level of θ. Then consider the Poincaré first return map P : Σ Σ θ φ H τ(θ) (θ), which is a local diffeomorphism and for which θ is a fixed point.

The Poincaré map Let θ = ( x, p) be a periodic point for the Hamiltonian flow of positive period T > 0. Fix a local section Σ which is transversal to the flow at θ and contained in the energy level of θ. Then consider the Poincaré first return map P : Σ Σ θ φ H τ(θ) (θ), which is a local diffeomorphism and for which θ is a fixed point. The Poincaré map is symplectic, i.e. it preserves the restriction of the symplectic form to T θ Σ.

The symplectic group Let Sp(m) be the symplectic group in M 2m (R) (m = n 1), that is the smooth submanifold of matrices X M 2m (R) satisfying [ ] 0 X Im JX = J where J :=. I m 0 Choosing a convenient set of coordinates, the differential of the Poincaré map is the symplectic matrix X (T ) where X : [0, T ] Sp(m) is solution to the Cauchy problem { Ẋ (t) = A(t)X (t) t [0, T ], X (0) = I 2m, where A(t) has the form ( ) 0 Im A(t) = K(t) 0 t [0, T ].

Perturbation of the Poincaré map Let γ be the projection of the periodic orbit passing through θ, we are looking for a potential V : M R satisfying the following properties V ( γ(t) ) = 0, dv ( γ(t) ) = 0, with d 2 V ( γ(t) ) free.

Perturbation of the Poincaré map Let γ be the projection of the periodic orbit passing through θ, we are looking for a potential V : M R satisfying the following properties V ( γ(t) ) = 0, dv ( γ(t) ) = 0, with d 2 V ( γ(t) ) free. = d 2 V ( γ(t) ) is the control.

A controllability problem on Sp(m) The Poincaré map at time T associated with the new Hamiltonian H + V is given by X u (T ) where X u : [0, T ] Sp(m) is solution to the control problem { Ẋu (t) = A(t)X u (t) + m i j=1 u ij(t)e(ij)x u (t), t [0, T ], X (0) = I 2m, where the 2m 2m matrices E(ij) are defined by ( ) 0 0 E(ij) :=, E(ij) 0 with { (E(ii))k,l := δ ik δ il i = 1,..., m, (E(ij)) k,l = δ ik δ jl + δ il δ jk i < j = 1,..., m.

The End-Point mapping We have to study the mapping E : C ( [0, τ]; R m(m+1)/2) Sp(m) u X u (T ).

The End-Point mapping We have to study the mapping E : C ( [0, τ]; R m(m+1)/2) Sp(m) u X u (T ). If we can show that E is a submersion at u = 0, we are done.

First-order controllability Lemma Assume that there is t [0, T ] such that ( { }) dim Span [E(ij), K( t)] i, j {1,..., m}, i < j Then we can reach a neighborhood of X 0 (T ). = m(m 1). 2

First-order controllability Lemma Assume that there is t [0, T ] such that ( { }) dim Span [E(ij), K( t)] i, j {1,..., m}, i < j Then we can reach a neighborhood of X 0 (T ). Lemma The set of matrices K S(m) such that ( { }) dim Span [E(ij), K] i, j {1,..., m}, i < j = is open and dense in S(m). = m(m 1). 2 m(m 1) 2

Thank you for your attention!!