ON THE RELATION BETWEEN GPS STRAIN FIELD AND ACTIVE FAULTS IN THE EASTERN BALTIC REGION

Similar documents
Earthquakes and Seismotectonics Chapter 5

GPS study of N-S trending Karaburun Belt (Turkey) and its E-W trending eastern part

The problem (1/2) GPS velocity fields in plate boundary zones are very smooth. What does this smoothness hide?

EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE MECHANISMS SHOW MOTION

Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March

Materials and Methods The deformation within the process zone of a propagating fault can be modeled using an elastic approximation.

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

The BIFROST Project: 21 years of search for the true crustal deformation in Fennoscandia

Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards Earth - Chapter 11 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Earthquakes. Forces Within Eartth. Faults form when the forces acting on rock exceed the rock s strength.

Coulomb stress changes due to Queensland earthquakes and the implications for seismic risk assessment

Forces in the Earth s crust

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

GPS measurements of current crustal movements along the Gulf of Suez, Egypt.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The Size and Duration of the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake from Far-Field Static Offsets

Recent GNSS Developments and Reference Frame Issues in Turkey. Onur LENK and Bahadir AKTUĞ

EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS OF MODERATELY EARTHQUAKE IN THE SOUTH EASTERN IRAN BASED ON TELESEISMIC AND REGIONAL DISTANCES

Slip distributions of the 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Nankai earthquakes including the horizontal movement effect on tsunami generation

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

Earthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network , preliminary results

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

Seth Stein and Emile Okal, Department of Geological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston IL USA. Revised 2/5/05

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Earthquakes Chapter 19

ESTIMATES OF HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 1999 TAIWAN EARTHQUAKE

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

Earthquakes How and Where Earthquakes Occur

COULOMB STRESS CHANGES DUE TO RECENT ACEH EARTHQUAKES

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Title: Impact of Regional Reference Frame Definition on Geodynamic Interpretations

Characterization of Induced Seismicity in a Petroleum Reservoir: A Case Study

On the Use of Crustal Deformation Models. in the Management of ETRS89 Realizations in Fennoscandia

Earthquakes Earth, 9th edition, Chapter 11 Key Concepts What is an earthquake? Earthquake focus and epicenter What is an earthquake?

Earthquake stress drop estimates: What are they telling us?

Centroid moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Tectonics of the terrestrial litosphere in spherical harmonics

NEAR FIELD EXPERIMENTAL SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH ALGERIAN REGULATORY DESIGN SPECTRUM

Magnitude 7.9 SE of KODIAK, ALASKA

EUREF Technical Note 1: Relationship and Transformation between the International and the European Terrestrial Reference Systems

Earthquakes and seismic hazard in Sweden

Tectonic deformations in Greece and the operation of HEPOS network

Coulomb stress change for the normal-fault aftershocks triggered near the Japan Trench by the 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

Journal of Geophysical Research Letters Supporting Information for

THE SEISMICITY OF THE CAMPANIAN PLAIN: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Tohoku-oki event: Tectonic setting

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

of other regional earthquakes (e.g. Zoback and Zoback, 1980). I also want to find out

ON NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS OF NORMAL AND REVERSE FAULTS FROM VIEWPOINT OF DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODEL

I. Locations of Earthquakes. Announcements. Earthquakes Ch. 5. video Northridge, California earthquake, lecture on Chapter 5 Earthquakes!

Specification of the Baltic Sea Chart Datum 2000 (BSCD2000)

revised October 30, 2001 Carlos Mendoza

CAP M S Wallace. Vol. 27 No. 2 Jun EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH IN CHINA M S 4. 8 CAP. 3km - - P315

Forces in Earth s Crust

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

A New Transformation Including Deformation Model for the Nordic and Baltic Countries

Using information about wave amplitudes to learn about the earthquake size.

Teleseismic waveform modelling of the 2008 Leonidio event

Rotation of the Principal Stress Directions Due to Earthquake Faulting and Its Seismological Implications

Magnitude 7.8 SCOTIA SEA

NTUA, Faculty of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Dionysos Satellite Observatory, Higher Geodesy Laboratory NOA, Institute of Geodynamics 1

Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

Lab 6: Earthquake Focal Mechanisms (35 points)

Earthquake Stress Drops in Southern California

The area of the fault, the dislocation, the stress drop and the seismic moment of the Friuli of May 6th, 1976

Realizing a geodetic reference frame using GNSS in the presence of crustal deformations: The case of Greece

Synthetic Seismicity Models of Multiple Interacting Faults

Geometry of co-seismic surface ruptures and tectonic meaning of the 23 October 2011 Mw 7.1 Van earthquake (East Anatolian Region, Turkey)

RELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE SUMATRAN FAULT AND THEIR FAULT PLANES

Figure 2-1. Diagram of earth movements produced by (a) P-waves and (b) S-waves.

FOCAL MECHANISM DETERMINATION OF LOCAL EARTHQUAKES IN MALAY PENINSULA

Once you have opened the website with the link provided choose a force: Earthquakes

Seismic Source Mechanism

Introduction to Displacement Modeling

Electronic supplement for Forearc motion and deformation between El Salvador and Nicaragua: GPS, seismic, structural, and paleomagnetic observations

Preliminary slip model of M9 Tohoku earthquake from strongmotion stations in Japan - an extreme application of ISOLA code.

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

OCEAN/ESS 410. Lab 12. Earthquake Focal Mechanisms. You can write your answers to all be (e) on this paper.

S e i s m i c W a v e s

Magnitude 6.9 GULF OF CALIFORNIA

RECIPE FOR PREDICTING STRONG GROUND MOTIONS FROM FUTURE LARGE INTRASLAB EARTHQUAKES

Lesvos June 12, 2017, Mw 6.3 event, a quick study of the source

P105 Particularities of Astrakhan Gas Field Deep Structure Resulting from Microseismic Sounding Technique Application

Tokyo, Japan,

Brittle Deformation. Earth Structure (2 nd Edition), 2004 W.W. Norton & Co, New York Slide show by Ben van der Pluijm

Summary so far. Geological structures Earthquakes and their mechanisms Continuous versus block-like behavior Link with dynamics?

Seismic Activity near the Sunda and Andaman Trenches in the Sumatra Subduction Zone

BEYOND TRAVELTIMES AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATION What else can seismograms tell us about the nature of earthquakes on faults?

Earthquakes Modified

3D Finite Element Modeling of fault-slip triggering caused by porepressure

Magnitude 8.2 NORTHWEST OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Seismic Characteristics and Energy Release of Aftershock Sequences of Two Giant Sumatran Earthquakes of 2004 and 2005

Downloaded 10/10/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

4 Deforming the Earth s Crust

EQ Monitoring and Hazards NOTES.notebook. January 07, P-wave. S-wave. surface waves. distance

RELATION BETWEEN RAYLEIGH WAVES AND UPLIFT OF THE SEABED DUE TO SEISMIC FAULTING

Centroid-moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Earthquake Focal Mechanisms and Waveform Modeling

Lab 7: Earthquakes. Figure 7-1. Diagram of earth movements produced by (a) P-waves and (b) S-waves.

Transcription:

ON THE RELATION BETWEEN GPS STRAIN FIELD AND ACTIVE FAULTS IN THE EASTERN BALTIC REGION B.A. Assinovskaya 1, V.L. Gorshkov 2, N.V. Shcherbakova 2, N.M. Panas 1 1 Geophysical Service RAS, seismic station Pulkovo, St. Petersburg, 197140, Russia, e-mail: bela.assin@gmail.com; 2 Central astronomical observatory at Pulkovo RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract. The strain field of Eastern Gulf of Finland-Gulf of Bothnian region has been studied using specially processed GPS-data of Finnish, Sweden, Estonian and Latvian stations. The software GIPSY 6.1.2 (JPL) was used for elaboration. The regional strain field was mapped and analyzed by GRID_STRAIN (Teza et al., 2007). The results were compared with seismic data. The known Osmussaar earthquake (M=4.6) occurred in 1976 in this region. The new digital records of this event were obtained and some source parameters were revalued. The earthquake source zone was studied by COULOMB 3.1 (Toda et al. 2005, Lin, Stein 2004) software in 3D. The stress-strain condition results were compared with GPS-features. In the result, the active fault zones were specified more exactly. The revealed seismotectonic features are very important for seismic hazard assessment of the Baltic Sea region. INTRODUCTION The strain field ΔL/L (nan ostrain/yr) evaluated by GRID_STRAIN software and seismicity around the Lake Ladoga Gulf of Finland region has been previously studied (Assinovskaya, Shchukin, Gorshkov, Shcherbakoba, 2011) using specially processed GPS-data. The GPS-station velocities on long-term observation were estimated by GIPSY 5.0. Analyzing the strain field it was supposed that the borders between areas of different strain-stress state indicate the regional active faults position. The data obtained were compared with regional tectonics and earthquake focal mechanisms. This work covers the area of Gulf of Bothnia and Gulf of Finland joint where significant seismic activity presents and the known Osmussaar earthquake has been occurred. The Osmussaar earthquake (October 25 1976 М =4.8, Н=13 km, I0= 6-7, origin time 08h 39m 47.4s, epicenter 59.36 N (+5.0 km) 23.34 E (+4.6 km)) was one of the first largest events in this region. Instrumentally, the 1976 earthquake source zone was researched by N. K. Bulin (Bulin et al, 1980). Two aftershocks at a depth of 13 km were registered and local deep structure was researched. The main event and two aftershocks formed NW-SE directed line that coincided with one of the focal mechanism plane (see Fig.1). Dr. Slunga (1979) modeled the 1976 earthquake source using surface waves of analog records in the range of distance 1-10º. He found that the earthquake had strike-slip mechanism but contained a part of reverse dip-slip faulting (Fig.1). But it is known that any focal mechanism solution never gives a single answer what fault plane is responsible for earthquake occurrence. In this work, we use independent geodynamic GPS data to model the regional strain field to reveal active structure zones and to point to true earthquake fault plane. Besides, we conducted the special analysis of 1976 focal mechanism data. The results obtained were used for seismic hazard zoning. The Osmussaar earthquake source parameters were calculated also in (Slunga, 1979). The seismic moment was equal 3.5 10 15 n m and the stress drop was equal 150 Mpa. The last value seemed to be too large especially if to compare it with the same parameter of Kaliningrad 2004 earthquakes. The stress drop was 37.4 MPa in the source of the second event of Kaliningrad earthquakes. In this connection some analog seismograms recorded by regional stations were digitized to analyze Sg wave spectrum and to reassess source parameters too. 137

Fig.1. The Osmussaar earthquake position (after R. Slunga, 1979 with our addition). The open circle represents the 1976 epicenter, blue stars note Bulin s aftershocks (see also below). The solid circles denote macroseismic epicenters of earlier shocks in the area. The yellow circles are historical events. The red stars are earthquake epicenters registered instrumentally in 1976-2008. The straight solid lines AA and BB show the orientation of the two possible fault planes. The two heavy dashed lines are curves of constant uplift rate of 0.2 cm/yr (upper line) and 0.4 cm/yr (lower line). The dashed curve lines are the border of crystalline basement. The lines in the Baltic Sea are faults. The nodal planes show stereographic projection of the lower hemisphere. Black regions show compression, white show dilatation. GPS-DATA AND DATA PROCESSING The raw GPS-data of permanent stations of Finland, Sweden (SWEPOS), Latvia (LATPOS) and Estonia (see Tabl. 1) for 1999-2009 were used to elaborate together. The GPS-observation of IGS stations were collected from international archive sites (ftp://igs.bkg.bund.de/euref/obs/ and ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/data/daily/). The original GPS-data of SWEPOS net were kindly provided us by Mats Westberg from SWEPOS Control Centre. The data of LATPOS net have been gotten from site http://www.latpos.lgia.gov.lv/spiderweb/frmindex.aspx. A daily positions for each station were estimated by the GIPSY-OASIS software version 6.1.2 (GIPSY 6.1.2 Release Notes, 2012) and then were assessed station velocities. The velocity estimations for Finnish stations OLKI and TOUR (light grey in the Table 1) were only used from (Lidberg at al., 2009) solution. A daily positions and velocities for each station were solved by the GIPSY-OASIS software version 6.1.2 (GIPSY 6.1.2 Release Notes, 2012). Strain fields were modeled using software GRID_STRAIN (Teza et al., 2007). The special software's were used to digitize the analog seismogram and to get the source spectrum of the Osmussaar 1976 earthquake. The source dynamics assessment was carried out with Coulomb 3.1 program (Toda et al 2005; Lin, Stein 2004, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/modeling/coulomb). 138

RESULTS Tabl. 1 Positions and horizontal velocities of GPS-station under investigation Station Lonº Latº Ve (mm) Vn (mm) Period (years) LEK0 14.877 60.722-0.10 ± 0.05-0.66 ± 0.06 2007-2009 NOR0 16.246 58.590 0.13 0.05-0.78 0.05 2007-2009 MAR6 17.258 60.595 0.74 0.03-0.70 0.03 2007-2011 UPP0 17.590 59.865 0.21 0.05-1.02 0.04 2007-2009 VIS0 18.367 57.654 0.56 0.03-0.93 0.02 2007-2011 LOV0 17.829 59.338-0.19 0.05-1.08 0.05 2007-2009 METS 24.395 60.217 1.15 0.03-0.63 0.03 2007-2011 SUUR 24.380 59.464 0.85 0.05-1.19 0.05 2007-2011 KURE 22.510 58.256 0.81 0.04-0.99 0.03 2008-2011 LIEP 21.006 56.511-0.51 0.04-1.09 0.03 2006-2009 VENT 21.548 57.391 0.30 0.03-0.99 0.03 2006-2010 VAL0 25.406 57.536 0.61 0.04-1.17 0.04 2008-2011 RIGA 24.059 56.949 0.24 0.03-0.49 0.03 2007-2001 KULD 21.959 56.969 0.14 0.04-0.77 0.03 2006-2009 OLKI 21.473 61.240 0.92 0.04-1.22 0.06 1999-2008 TUOR 22.443 60.416 0.74 0.03-1.31 0.05 1999-2008 The horizontal velocity data were transformed using the ITRF2005 (Altamimi et al., 2007) absolute rotation pole for Eurasia (Tabl. 1). These residual velocities are shown in Fig. 2a. Using all these velocity estimations the strain fields were modeled by software GRID_STRAIN (Teza et al., 2007). The strain fields are shown in Fig. 2b. a b Fig.2. a) GPS-station residual velocities relative to Eurasia plate (blue arrows) and its error ellipses (red). Black circles show GPS station positions. b) Strain fields ΔL/L; nanostrain/yr prepared using Table1 data and software (Teza et al. 2007). Blue and red arrows are extension and compression values respectively. The strain field are calculated on the 50 50 km grid. 139

It is seen that the general NW-SE direction of movement corresponded to local plate movement are broken in some places. This diversity of orientations marked in the velocity of horizontal movement field may be occurring due to the influence of an active fault tectonics in the Gulf of Finland and in the Gulf of Bothnian. The strain field obtained is inhomogeneous in the region of study; there are several blocks with different kind of strain from strike-slip up to full dilatation. However, the interpretation cannot be considered as unique due to the small number of station net. The general orientation of the deformation by GPS coincides with the fault planes in the 1976 Osmussaar earthquake focal mechanism solution, both NW and SW directions can be active. Another method of modeling was used to research the stress field in the area of study. The earthquake Coulomb stress change modeling (Fig. 3) allows getting distribution of parameters on the source level. According to the method used red lobes mean positive Coulomb stress values and outline the area of cracks that could form during the seismic process. This spacious area of cracks with a size about 3 km occurred if only the first NW plane of focal mechanism is realized (Fig.3a). Moreover this NW trend coincides with the direction of the line connecting aftershocks and main shock positions. a b Fig. 3. 1976 Osmussaar earthquake source Coulomb stress change map prepared using software COULOMB 3.1 (Toda et al. 2005; Lin, Stein 2004). Focal mechanism is according to (Slunga, 1979): a) plane I (strike 162º, dip 69º, rake 17º) b) Plane II (Strike 65, dip 74, slip - 158 ). See Fig.1 On the second possible plane the strike slip right lateral motions on the line located along the Gulf of Finland coastline could be realized. There is a geologically found fault in this area. But the depth of that fault is unknown. And it is seen that red lobes aren t such big as it is in the first case (Fig.3b). In this situation we prefer the NW focal mechanism plane. Probably NW fault is active recently. Additionally, we tried to reassess the stress drop value in the 1976 Osmussaar source. We digitized some analog seismogram to get the source spectrum. The processing included data smoothing, response correction and scale corrections and spectrum analysis in terms of velocities and displacements. The corner frequency f c seemed to be ~1.4 Hz, source radius was 900 m. And if M 0 =3.5 10 15 nm (Slunga, 1979), Δσ =2.1 Mpa. This value is less on two orders than that mentioned above. 140

Amplitude, mkm 10 1 displacement 0.1 1 2 Hz Fig.4. Amplitude displacement spectrum, seismic station MOS, seismograph CHARIN. Red lines note flat and sloping parts of spectrum respectively. Blue arrow shows the corner frequency value. CONCLUSIONS The GPS observations of permanent stations located near the Finnish-Bothnian area and around the 1976 Osmussaar earthquake source zone were elaborated. Some data were processed first. The GPS-velocity data were analysed to get an overview about recent geodynamics in the region. The map of horizontal strain was compiled, some areas of different strain type were revealed and borders between these areas were accepted like presumably active faults. The 1976 Osmussaar earthquake focal mechanism data were analysed also and NW-SE direction fault was chosen like an active one. It was established that the GPS-deformation features agree with focal mechanism solution. Some source parameters such as corner frequency and stress drop were specified. References: Altamimi, Z., Collilieux, X., Legrand, J., Garayt, B. and Boucher, C., ITRF2005: A new Release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on Time Series of Station Positions and Earth Orientation Parameters. J. Geophys. Res., 112, B09401, doi:10.1029/2007jb004949. Assinovskaya, B., Shchukin, J., Gorshkov V.and Shcherbakova, N. (2011), On recent geodynamics of the Eastern Baltic Sea region. Baltica, 24 (2), 61-70. Lidberg M., J. M. Jonsson, H.-G. Scherneck and G.A.Milne (2009), Recent results base on continuous GPS observations of the GIA process in Fennoscandia from BIFROST, J. Geodyn. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.jog. 2009.11.010. Slunga R. (1979), Source mechanism of a Baltic earthquake inferred from surface-wave recordings. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 69(6), 1931-1969. Teza G., А. Pesci and А. Galgaro (2008), Grid_strain and grid_strain3: Software packages for strain field computation in 2D and 3D environments, Computers & Geosciences, 34, 9, 1142-1153. Toda, S., Stein S. R. and Richards-Dinger K., Bozkurt S. (2005), Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer. J. Geophys. Res., 110, B05S16, doi:10.1029/2004jb003415. 141