PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Similar documents
New Results from the MINOS Experiment

Cosmic Muons Induced EM Shower in NOνA

NO A. Karol Lang. University of Texas at Austin. For the NOvA Collaboration. XII International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Cosmic Muon induced EM Showers in NOνA Detector

Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments

Neutrino interaction systematic errors in MINOS and NOvA

Search for sterile neutrino mixing in the muon neutrino to tau neutrino appearance channel with the OPERA detector

arxiv: v3 [hep-ex] 24 Nov 2015

MINOS experiment at Fermilab

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota. High Energy seminar, University of Virginia

A data summary file structure and analysis tools for neutrino oscillation analysis at the NOvA experiment

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

MINOS Oscillation Results from The First Year of NuMI Beam Operation

PoS(Nufact08)003. Status and Prospects of Long Baseline ν Oscillation Experiments

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Long Baseline Neutrinos

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

The NuMI Off-axis ν e Appearance Experiment (NOνA)

The NOνA Neutrino Experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 22 Dec 2018

Neutrinos & the MINOS Experiment

Latest Results from MINOS and MINOS+ Will Flanagan University of Texas on behalf of the MINOS+ Collaboration

Neutrino Oscillation Results from MINOS

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Recent results from Super-Kamiokande

PHYS 5326 Lecture #2. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

First MINOS Results from the NuMI Beam

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

K2K and T2K experiments

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

MINOS. Physics Program and Construction Status. Karol Lang The University of Texas at Austin. YITP: Neutrinos and Implications for Physics Beyond

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

Outline. (1) Physics motivations. (2) Project status

Latest results from MINOS

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

NEUTRINOS II The Sequel

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

reνolution Three Neutrino Oscillation Lecture Two Lindley Winslow Massachusetts Institute of Technology

LBNF Neutrino Beam. James Strait Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL , USA. on behalf of the LBNF/DUNE Team

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

A High Resolution Neutrino Experiment in a Magnetic Field for Project-X at Fermilab

NOE, a Neutrino Oscillation Experiment at Gran Sasso Laboratory

What If U e3 2 < 10 4? Neutrino Factories and Other Matters

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

Studies of NOνA neutrino flux with NDOS

Anti-fiducial Muons in MINOS. Matthew Strait. University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

Existing and future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments

Lessons from Neutrinos in the IceCube Deep Core Array

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

PoS(KAON)049. Testing the µ e universality with K ± l ± ν decays

Results from T2K. Alex Finch Lancaster University ND280 T2K

Comparisons and Combinations of Oscillation Measurements

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

IceCube Results & PINGU Perspectives

Neutrino Cross Section Measurements for Long-Baseline Acceleratorbased Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

A study on different configurations of Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment

The T2K Neutrino Experiment

T2K and other long baseline experiments (bonus: reactor experiments) Justyna Łagoda

N u P J-PARC Seminar August 20, 2015

Longbase Neutrino Physics. Neil McCauley University of Liverpool Birmingham February 2013

Latest results from NOvA

Test bench for measurements of NOvA scintillator properties at JINR D.S. Velikanova, 1 A.I. Antoshkin, 1 N.V. Anfimov, 1 O.B.

The Multiple Muon Charge Ratio in MINOS Far Detector

Chapter 2 The MINOS and MINOS+ Experiments

Camillo Mariani Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech

Hadron Production Experiments and Neutrino Beams

Accelerator neutrino experiments

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Neutrino Experiments: Lecture 2 M. Shaevitz Columbia University

NEW νe Appearance Results from the. T2K Experiment. Matthew Malek Imperial College London. University of Birmingham HEP Seminar 13 June 2012

The Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Kate Scholberg, Duke University NOW 2012

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

The SHiP experiment. Colloquia: IFAE A. Paoloni( ) on behalf of the SHiP Collaboration. 1. Introduction

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

Measurement of q 13 in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments. Stefan Roth, RWTH Aachen Seminar, DESY, 21 st /22 nd January 2014

Review of νe Appearance Oscillation Experiments

ICARUS T600 experiment: latest results and perspectives

Chapter 2 T2K Experiment

Charged Current Quasielastic Analysis from MINERνA

fro m t h e MIN O S E x pe rim e n t

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

Neutrino Cross Sections for (Future) Oscillation Experiments. Pittsburgh Flux Workshop December 7, 2012 Deborah Harris Fermilab

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

Transcription:

University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 5555, USA E-mail: pawloski@physics.umn.edu NOvA is a long-baseline accelerator neutrino experiment that studies neutrino oscillation phenomena governed by the atmospheric mass squared splitting. NOvA has the potential to resolve the neutrino mass hierarchy and the octant of θ at the σ level. The NOvA collaboration is expected to release its first oscillation results this year (5). XVI International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes, -6 March 5 Palazzo Franchetti âăş Istituto Veneto, Venice, Italy Speaker. For the NOvA Collaboration c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

. Introduction Although the past two decades have seen unprecedented advancement in the field of neutrino physics, many fundamental questions remain about the nature of neutrinos. Is there CP violation in the lepton sector? What is the neutrino mass ordering? Is θ maximal, and if not, then what is the octant of θ? The NOvA experiment is capable of probing these questions by studying the transition of muon neutrinos (antineutrinos) to the other neutrino (antineutrinos) flavors along a baseline of 8 km at an energy near GeV. The experiment uses two functionally identical detectors to measure the transition rate. The first detector, referred to as the near detector (ND) is. kt and is located less than km from the production target at Fermilab. The ND is used to measure the neutrino energy spectrum before the neutrinos have oscillated. The second detector, referred to as the far detector (FD), is kt and located at Ash River, Minnesota a distance of 8 km from the production target. The FD is used to measure the effect of oscillation on the neutrino energy spectrum. Because the detectors are functionally identically, systematic effects from flux, cross-section, and detector efficiencies are greatly reduced when comparing the event yields in the two detectors.. Beam The neutrino beam is created in the NuMI facility [] by colliding GeV protons from the Fermilab Main Injector with a graphite target. The collision products are focused by two magnetic horns and directed down a.68 km decay pipe where the resulting decays produce the neutrino beam. The polarity of the horns can be reversed to run in a neutrino-enhanced or an antineutrinoenhanced beam. The NOvA detectors are located at a mrad off-axis angle which results in a narrow-band neutrino energy spectrum that is peaked near GeV. The resulting NuMI energy spectra for various off-axis angles is shown in Fig.. The narrow band beam operation reduces the neutral-current (NC) backgrounds to the identification of ν e charged-current (CC) and ν µ CC events. The NUMI design goal is run at a 7 kw beam power with 6 protons on target (POT) being delivered to NOvA each year. The nominal plan is to accumulate 8 POT in neutrino mode and 8 POT in antineutrino mode. To date, 6 POT in neutrino mode have been delivered to NOvA. However, about half of the beam data was collected with a variable-fraction of the final FD mass as the FD was being assembled.. Detectors The NOvA detectors are liquid scintillator tracking calorimeters. The FD is composed of extruded PVC cells that are cm x 6 cm x 5.6 m. The cells are grouped into 5.6 m x 5.6 m x 6 cm planes with the cells in an individual plane running parallel to each other. The FD is composed of 896 planes that are layered so that the orientation of cells in each successive plane are rotated by 9 o. The cells are filled with a liquid scintillator that is composed of mineral oil and a pseudocumene scintillant. In order to collect the light that is produced in the scintillator, a single wavelength shifting fiber runs down the length of the cell. The fiber wraps around at one end of

Medium Energy Tune ν CC events / kt / E POT /. GeV μ 8 6 on-axis 7 mrad off-axis mrad off-axis mrad off-axis 6 8 E ν (GeV) Figure : The neutrino spectra (flux times cross-section) for various angles. The NOvA detectors are located at mrad which corresponds to a peak neutrino energy that is located near the first oscillation maximum. the cell and is readout by both ends by a single APD pixel. The FD is 77% active by mass with a radiation length of 8 cm which corresponds to a distance of 6 planes along the beam direction and a distance of cells transverse to the beam direction. The ND is based on the same design as the FD, but is smaller than FD. The planes are. m x. m x 6 cm, and there are only 6 planes. In order to range out muons, the end of the ND contains ten -cm wide steel planes that are interspersed with active scintillator planes.. Event Selection The survival probability for muon neutrinos is determined by comparing the energy dependent event yield for ν µ -CC interactions in the FD with respect to the ND. The ν µ -CC events are selected by identifying contained neutrino interactions that have a reconstructed muon track. The muon track is identified by using a knn algorithm that uses information about the the track length, scattering, de/dx, and fraction of the track hits (in number of planes) without overlapping hadronic activity. The performance of the ν µ -CC selector is shown in Fig.. The events with a knn value greater than.75 are selected which results in a 5 to signal to background ratio. The ν µ -CC events are further separated into quasielastic and non-quasielastic events by another knn algorithm. The knn algorithm has been trained separately based on the number of reconstructed tracks in the event. The performance of the quasielastic classifier is shown in Fig.. The events are separated by quasielastic and non-quasielastic topologies to increase the sensitivity of the final fit to the reconstruction energy spectrum. The quasielastic events have a % energy resolution while the non-quasielastic have a 6% energy resolution.

sin θ =.5 m =.e- ev 8e POT, ν Mode, kton Events/8e POT CC Events ν µ Background Events...6.8 ν µ CC Event ID Figure : The knn output of the ν µ -CC selector. Values near are background-like, and values near are signal-like. Events/8e POT 5 sin θ =.5 m =.e- ev 8e POT, ν Mode, kton: Track Sample ν µ CC QE Events ν µ CC Non-QE and Background Events...6.8 ν µ CC QE Event ID Events/8e POT 5 sin θ =.5 m =.e- ev 8e POT, ν Mode, kton: Track Sample ν µ CC QE Events ν µ CC Non-QE and Background Events...6.8 ν µ CC QE Event ID Figure : The knn output for the quasielastic classifier for ν µ -CC events. Values near are nonquasielastic-like, and values near are quasielastic-like. The figure on the left is for events with one reconstructed track, and the figure on the right is for events with two reconstructed track. If more than two tracks are present in the event, then it is considered non-quasielastic. The appearance probability for electron neutrinos is determined by selecting ν e -CC events. These events are identified by finding contained neutrino interactions that have an electron. The electron is identified by using a multivariate technique that looks for a cluster of hits that are consistent with a electromagnetic shower from an electron. Two ν e -CC selectors are used to test for consistency among the methods. The performance of the ν e -CC selectors are shown in Fig.. Both ν e -CC selectors which result in a to signal to background ratio. 5. Physics Sensitivity The expected reconstructed energy distributions of selected FD ν µ -CC events collected over the final beam exposure of 8 POT of neutrino running and 8 POT of antineutrino running are shown in Fig. 5 for the selected quasielastic events and in Fig. 6 for the selected nonquasielastic events. Based on these expected energy distributions the sensitivity to θ and m is shown in Fig. 7.

NOνA Preliminary NOνA Preliminary Events/ year exposure Cosmic Data NC ν µ Beam ν e Osc. ν e Events/ year exposure Cosmic Data NC ν µ Beam ν e Osc. ν e -.5 LEM.5 EID Figure : The output of the two ν e -CC selectors, referred to as LEM and EID. Values near are backgroundlike, and values near are signal-like. The vertical dashed red lines indicate the corresponding cut values for each selector. Events/. GeV/8e POT 6 m =.e- ev 8e POT, ν Mode, kton: QE Sample sin θ =.5 5 QE Neutrino Energy (GeV) Events/. GeV/8e POT m =.e- ev 8e POT, ν Mode, kton: QE Sample sin θ =.5 5 QE Neutrino Energy (GeV) Figure 5: The simulated reconstructed energy distribution for selected quasielastic events. The plot on the left (right) is for events collected with a neutrino-enhanced (antineutrino-enhanced) beam. Events/. GeV/8e POT 8 6 m =.e- ev 8e POT, ν Mode, kton: Non-QE Sample sin θ =.5 Events/. GeV/8e POT m =.e- ev 8e POT, ν Mode, kton: Non-QE Sample sin θ =.5 5 Non-QE Neutrino Energy (GeV) 5 Non-QE Neutrino Energy (GeV) Figure 6: The simulated reconstructed energy distribution for selected non-quasielastic events. The plot on the left (right) is for events collected with a neutrino-enhanced (antineutrino-enhanced) beam.

.7 NOνA Sensitivity ( kton) ) ev - ( m.6.5. 8e POT ν+8e POT ν modes σ σ......5.6.7 sin θ Figure 7: The NOvA sensitivity to θ and m using the expected final NOvA data sample. The black (red) contours are the sensitivity if the values of θ and m are given by the black (red) dot. significance of CP violation (σ).5.5.5 NOνA CPV determination sin θ =.95, sin θ =..5 Inverted Normal...6.8...6.8 / π δ CP 6 POT Figure 8: The NOvA sensitivity to δ CP using the expected final NOvA data sample. The plot shows the significance to which no CP violation can be ruled out as a function of the true value of δ CP. Using the value of θ and m measured in the ν µ-cc analysis, the ν e -CC appearance analysis will place constraints on δ CP, the mass hierarchy, and the octant of θ. The potential constraints are shown in Fig. 8, Fig. 9, and Fig.. 6. Summary To date, 6 POT have be delivered to NOvA with a neutrino beam. The nominal plan is for NOvA to accumulate a total of 8 POT in neutrino mode and 8 POT in antineutrino mode. With the total data set, NOvA will make precision measurements of θ and m. Depending on the value of θ and δ CP, NOvA has the potential to resolve the neutrino mass hierarchy and the octant of θ at the σ level.

significance of hierarchy resolution (σ) sin θ =.95, sin θ =..5.5.5.5 NOνA hierarchy resolution Inverted Normal...6.8...6.8 / π δ CP 6 POT Figure 9: The NOvA sensitivity to mass hierarchy using the expected final NOvA data sample. The plot shows the significance to which the hierarchy can be resolved as a function of the true value of δ CP. significance of octant determination (σ).5.5.5.5.5 NOνA octant determination sin θ =.95, sin θ =.95, θ >π/ 5 Inverted Normal...6.8...6.8 / π δ CP 6 POT Figure : The NOvA sensitivity to the octant of θ using the expected final NOvA data sample. The plot shows the significance to which the octant can be resolved as a function of the true value of δ CP assuming sin (θ ) =.95. If sin (θ ) is greater than.95 the sensitivity degrades as θ becomes closer to maximal. References [] K. Anderson et al., The NuMI Facility Technical Design Report,FERMILAB-DESIGN-998- (998).