The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami Sequence. Mitchell May, EPSC 330

Similar documents
Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March

THE 2011 TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN. VSU Lyuben Karavelov, Sofia, Bulgaria. Key words: Tohoku earthquake, strong ground motion, damage

Tsunami waves swept away houses and cars in northern Japan and pushed ships aground.

Centroid moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Earthquakes and Tsunamis

Centroid-moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Coseismic slip model

Magnitude 7.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

REPORT ON THE TOHOKU AREA PASIFIC OFFSHORE EARTHQUAKE

Earthquake Source. Kazuki Koketsu. Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo

Disclaimer. This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC member countries.

Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards Earth - Chapter 11 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

What is an Earthquake?

Magnitude 7.7 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

Running Head: JAPANESE TSUNAMI 1. Geological Perspective of the Japanese Tsunami

Differentiating earthquake tsunamis from other sources; how do we tell the difference?

Earthquakes Earth, 9th edition, Chapter 11 Key Concepts What is an earthquake? Earthquake focus and epicenter What is an earthquake?

Earthquakes Chapter 19

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

Magnitude 7.0 N of ANCHORAGE, ALASKA

AVERAGE AND VARIATION OF FOCAL MECHANISM AROUND TOHOKU SUBDUCTION ZONE

Lecture Outline Wednesday-Monday April 18 23, 2018

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Magnitude 8.2 NORTHWEST OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

Magnitude 7.2 OAXACA, MEXICO

SOURCE INVERSION AND INUNDATION MODELING TECHNOLOGIES FOR TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT, CASE STUDY: 2001 PERU TSUNAMI

What Is an Earthquake? What Is an Earthquake? Earthquake

Prevention Tsunami wall 10m high (breached by the tsunami due to land level falling by 3m)

San Andreas Movie Can It Happen?

Magnitude 7.6 SOUTH OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Tohoku-oki event: Tectonic setting

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 5-1. Risk Assessment and Hazard Mapping. CLUSTER 5: Hazard and Risk Information and Decision Making. Public Disclosure Authorized

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

W phase inversion and tsunami inundation modeling for tsunami. early warning: case study for the 2011 Tohoku event

Magnitude 7.9 SE of KODIAK, ALASKA

Features of Tsunami height according to type of coastal landforms 2011 Tohoku oki tsunami case

Seismic Activity and Crustal Deformation after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

I. Locations of Earthquakes. Announcements. Earthquakes Ch. 5. video Northridge, California earthquake, lecture on Chapter 5 Earthquakes!

THE 2011 OFF THE PACIFIC COAST OF TOHOKU-OKI EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI: INFLUENCE OF THE SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS ON THE MAXIMUM TSUNAMI HEIGHTS

Earthquakes. Earthquake Magnitudes 10/1/2013. Environmental Geology Chapter 8 Earthquakes and Related Phenomena

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TSUNAMI PROPAGATION AND INUNDATION ALONG THE RAKHINE COAST AREAS IN MYANMAR

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

Lessons from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and the Asian tsunami

LETTER Earth Planets Space, 56, , 2004

Tsunami Simulation of 2009 Dusky Sound Earthquake in New Zealand

Establishment and Operation of a Regional Tsunami Warning Centre

Tsunami and earthquake in Chile Part 2

Source of the July 2006 West Java tsunami estimated from tide gauge records

Magnitude 7.0 PAPUA, INDONESIA

JCR (2 ), JGR- (1 ) (4 ) 11, EPSL GRL BSSA

1.3 Short Review: Preliminary results and observations of the December 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake Kenji Hirata

Blank line 10 pt Keywords: Response Characteristics, Skyscraper, Tohoku-Oki earthquake, Natural operiod

Lecture notes Bill Engstrom: Instructor Earthquakes GLG 101 Physical Geology

4 Deforming the Earth s Crust

overlie the seismogenic zone offshore Costa Rica, making the margin particularly well suited for combined land and ocean geophysical studies (Figure

The great earthquakes that have shaped Japan 日本に大きな影響を与えた地震

Finding an Earthquake Epicenter Pearson Education, Inc.

Tsunami waveform analyses of the 2006 underthrust and 2007 outer-rise Kurile earthquakes

Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND

Peter Sammonds Professor of Geophysics

Effect of the Emperor seamounts on trans-oceanic propagation of the 2006 Kuril Island earthquake tsunami

SSA Annual Meeting Tip Sheet on Special Session: New observations, data on Japan and New Zealand earthquakes

Interlocking of heterogeneous plate coupling and aftershock area expansion pattern for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Mw9 earthquake

Earthquakes = shaking of Earth because of a rapid release of energy

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR JAPAN AFTER THE 2011 TOHOKU-OKI MEGA-THRUST EARTHQUAKE (Mw9.0)

2. Tsunami Source Details

Magnitude 6.5 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Slip distributions of the 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Nankai earthquakes including the horizontal movement effect on tsunami generation

Plate Tectonics IDEA THAT EARTH S SURFACE IS BROKEN INTO PLATES THAT MOVE AROUND. Fault = fracture in the crust where the movement has occurred

Coulomb stress change for the normal-fault aftershocks triggered near the Japan Trench by the 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

Case Study 2: 2014 Iquique Sequence

MECHANISM OF THE 2011 TOHOKU-OKI EARTHQUAKE: INSIGHT FROM SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY

UNIT - 7 EARTHQUAKES

Earthquakes and Earth s Interior

Warm-up #15. How does magma move throughout the mantle? What is another example of this movement in nature?

GEOLOGY MEDIA SUITE Chapter 13

Large submarine landslides in the Japan Trench: A new scenario for additional tsunami generation

Chapter 4 Earthquakes and Tsunamis

Chapter 4 Earthquakes and Tsunamis. Geology of the Hawaiian Islands. Any Questions? Class March Mean = 78.

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Title. Author(s)Heki, Kosuke. CitationScience, 332(6036): Issue Date Doc URL. Type. File Information. A Tale of Two Earthquakes

Preliminary slip model of M9 Tohoku earthquake from strongmotion stations in Japan - an extreme application of ISOLA code.

Unit 9 (packet #2): Volcanoes and Earthquakes

RR#8 - Free Response

Magnitude 7.5 PALU, INDONESIA

How to communicate Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake hazards

TSUNAMI CHARACTERISTICS OF OUTER-RISE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE PACIFIC COAST OF NICARAGUA - A CASE STUDY FOR THE 2016 NICARAGUA EVENT-

Magnitude 7.0 NEW CALEDONIA

Magnitude 7.3 OFFSHORE EL SALVADOR

Possible large near-trench slip during the 2011 M w 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake

RELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE PHILIPPINE FAULT ZONE AND THEIR FAULT PLANES

Modeling of the 2011 Tohoku-oki. oki Tsunami and it s s impacts to Hawaii

Transcription:

The 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami Sequence Mitchell May, 260556044 EPSC 330

The 2011 earthquake sequence east of Tohoku is classified as a megathrust earthquake off the east coast of Japan. The earthquake had a moment magnitude of M w 9.0, which was calculated from CMT data with periods over 300 seconds (Nettles, 2011). The primary rupture occurred at 05:46 am (UTC) on March 11 th 2011, after several foreshock events. The location of the earthquake epicenter was nearly 70 km east of the Oshika Peninsula of Tohoku. With a submerged hypocenter depth of approximately 30 km, the Tohoku event places fourth in the most powerful earthquakes recorded this century. It was also the most powerful earthquake recorded to have hit Japan using modern data collection, but events such as the 869 M w 8.9 Sanriku event are similar in comparison. The earthquake resulted in a megathrust earthquake generated tsunami with wave heights of up to 40.5 m observed in Miyako (Okayasu, 2011). Inundation from the tsunami spanned much of the east coast of Japan, with maximum flooding reaching nearly 10 km inland in the Sendai region (Buerk, 2011). The earthquake shifted Honshu 2.4 m east, and moved the Earth on its axis by estimates of between 10 cm, and 25 cm (Kenneth, 2011). Figure 1: This figure illustrates the island of Tohoku, and its relationship with the neighbouring fault system. Horizontal displacements throughout the island are shown as red arrows, observed by the GPS Earth Observations Network of Japan. The source fault is outlined by a rectangular grid, which encloses areas of large slip (blue and brown ellipses). The orange star denotes the main shock epicenter, while

foreshocks and aftershocks are labelled in white and orange circles, respectively (Koketsu, 2011). Geologic Setting The 2011 Tohoku earthquake occurred along a shallow subduction fault between the subducting Pacific plate, and overlying North American Plate. The fault which gave rise to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake is part of a much larger fault system, commonly referred to as the ring of fire. This fault system surrounds the Pacific plate, and acts as a means to accommodate oceanic crust formation in Pacific mid ocean ridges. The ring of fire has been active for hundreds of millions of years in some regions, with slip recurrence intervals varying with the geologic setting. Figure 2: The figure above shows the ring of fire over the Pacific Ocean. The region along the east coast of Japan is referred to as the Japan Trench. In an effort to constrain the recurrence interval of the subduction zone neighbouring Tohoku, scientists turned to inundated sediments for answers. Due to the oceanic setting of this subduction zone, past megathrust earthquakes can be correlated to tsunamis. The resulting

tsunamis propagate vast distances inland, transporting marine sediments with them. Scientists observed this phenomenon in some of the native Holocene sediments of Japan, and were able to constrain 3 inundation events as a result. The sedimentation observed was believed to be formed within the past 3000 years, which infers a recurrence interval of 800-1100 years for megathrust ruptures in the region. Considering the most recent regional megathrust in 869, it is apparent that the Tohoku earthquake was a recurrence of this fault mechanism. Megathrust faulting in this region; however, is believed to be a result of a much larger tectonic sequence. Tectonic Sequence With a vast number of unstable faults in the region, smaller earthquakes result in energy propagation, which influence the slip conditions of surrounding faults. In the case of the Tohoku earthquake, the megathrust was initiated by a foreshock sequence, and has produced over 800 aftershocks of over M w 4.5 since. The Tohoku sequence began with a M w 7.2 underthrusting foreshock which occurred at 2:45 am on March 9, 2011. This foreshock event was situated just 40 km north of the subsequent great earthquake epicenter, two days prior to its rupture. Aftershocks from the March 9th event propagated radially outward, with large earthquake events migrating towards the main shock nucleation region. Stress field alterations from the foreshock sequence are a likely precursor to the Tohoku main shock event. Figure 3: This image approximates slip of the overriding North American plate off the east coast of Japan. Centroid moment tensors of the foreshock, main shock, and aftershocks are labelled in blue, red, and orange, respectively. (Ide, 2011)

The main shock occurred at 5:46 am (UTC) on March 11, 2011. Centroid moment tensor analysis was conducted to isolate the slip orientation. The large rupture area and duration of the main shock make it necessary to limit the CMT analysis to very long periods (Nettles, 2011). Long period bands between 300 and 500 seconds were analyzed over the 8.5 hour long seismogram recordings. After cross referencing 100 seismic stations, a CMT with strike 203, dip 10, and rake 88 was recorded. These results are consistent with the primary fault orientation. The main rupture seismic moment varies from M w 9.0-9.1 depending on the methods of analysis. This uncertainty is due to the lack of constraint on hypocenter depth, and (Nettles, 2011) suggests a seismic moment range between 9.03 and 9.16. Ocean Bottom Analysis of Main Shock Finding vertical displacement of the primary fault is crucial for understanding water displacement off Japan s east coast. Using ocean-bottom pressure gauges, scientists have been able to relate the change in water pressure to uplift. Ocean-bottom pressure gauges were used to record water pressures near the fault scarp over the main shock event. A large negative offset of approximately 500 ± 50 hpa appears clearly after the M9 event. Negative pressure changes represent uplift at the observation points, as the pressure release is a result or water displacement away from the uplift. A change in pressure of 1 hpa corresponds to roughly 10 mm of vertical displacement, which yields a calculated uplift of 5 ± 0.5 m (Nettles, 2011).

Figure 4: This figure shows data collected from ocean bottom pressure gauges located near the primary fault scarp along the sea floor. The drastic drop in pressure is a result of uplifted ocean water propagating away from pressure gauges (Nettles, 2011). Aftershocks High magnitude aftershocks were observed almost immediately after the main shock, with two earthquakes generating seismic moments greater than 7. Thirty minutes after the main shock, a M w 7.9 earthquake occurred 250 km south of the main shock epicenter. The earthquake had a calculated focal mechanism which coincided with interplate slip observed in the main shock (Nettles, 2011). A second large aftershock occurred ten minutes later, of M w 7.6. This earthquake; however, differed from the main shock, as it was a result of normal faulting mechanisms. The second large aftershock was located east of the main shock epicenter, within the pacific plate. Aftershocks of this event are continuously observed to this day, with a notable M w 7.1 aftershock on October 26, 2013. The occurrence of aftershocks from the 2011 earthquake can be described by Omori s law. This law relates the occurrence interval of aftershocks to the reciprocal of time post rupture. In megathrust earthquakes such as the 2011 Tohoku event, we should expect to observe aftershocks in the future, but in far less abundance.

Figure 5: The figure above is a cross sectional view of the fault system east of Japan. Shaded dots represent aftershocks from the 2011 Tohoku event, which appear to follow the fault plane to depths of 50 m. Fault Structure Although a vertical displacement of 5 m was calculated for the fault, five horizontal displacements were also found, each with different values. The inconsistent nature of this movement is a result of numerous faults interacting with one another. In an attempt to understand this system, a fault model was developed using displacement data from (Nettles, 2011). Through the use of a two dimensional elastic half space model, scientists have constructed a cross sectional view of the subduction zone, assuming this zone is acting as the primary fault plane.

Figure 6: The figure above follows a dislocation model in conjunction with structural interpretations. Above the subducting thrust fault, a backstop reverse fault separates two cretaceous sequences which differ in deformation level. This reverse fault appears to be a result of horse structure growth, which is seen to repeat itself above the plate boundary. Other reverse and listric faults are present, but appeared to be inactive during the M w 9.0 event. Horizontal displacements were found to be as high as 74 m in areas of the overlying plate (Ito, 2011). Earthquake Preparation Prior to the 2011 Tohoku event, earthquakes off the coast of Japan weren t uncommon. Japan had experienced several disastrous earthquakes in recent time, consisting primarily of the M w 8.2-8.5 1896 Meiji Sanriku, and M w 8.1 1933 Showa Sanriku events, with smaller tsunamis occurring every 10-50 years (Nobuhito, 2011). Knowledge of past earthquakes had allowed Japan to invoke several countermeasures, aimed at mitigating future tsunami events. Barriers both on and off shore were built along Japan s east coast to reduce or prevent inundation from

tsunamis. Other natural barriers, such as tree planting, were implemented as well to reduce the effects of erosion n and liquefaction. In the 2011 paper by Nobuhito, it is emphasized that the Tohoku region was highly prepared for tsunamis. This area, like many regions of Japan, routinely practiced earthquake evacuation. The above countermeasures were believed to be sufficient in the event of the predicted Tohoku earthquake, but this was considering a modelled M w 7.4 event. The Japanese government reported that a M w 7.4 event along a 200 km fault off shore of Sendai was expected to occur with 99% probability within 30 years (Nobuhito, 2011). The poor forecasting during the M w 9.0 rupture left tsunami barriers severely damaged, and resulted in underestimated levels of inundation in several regions of Tohoku. Earthquake Response The Japan Meteorological society acted as first responders to the megathrust event, issuing tsunami warnings 3 minutes after the primary rupture (Nobuhito, 2011). It wasn t until 17 minutes later that the resulting tsunami made landfall along a 2000 km stretch of Japanese coast. Various coastal cities experienced flooding, with Sendai being the largest city affected. Japan s topography influence flooding a great deal, leaving the total tsunami inundation of 400km 2 unevenly distributed (Nobuhito, 2011). Of the numerous coastal regions affected by the tsunami, the southern region of Tohoku was particularly vulnerable to inundation. This is due to the relatively flat topography of the Sendai plain, which has shown evidence of large scale inundation in past events, such as the 869 Sanriku earthquake. Coastal areas in the Northeast of Japan, such as the Sanriku region, exhibit different geomorphology. Sanriku is host to ria coastal environments, which naturally mitigate

tsunamis with steep and narrow coastal bays. This mitigation was one of the reasons why southbound inundation was observed to be so large. Repercussions The 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami left a wake of destruction in its path, which is not uncommon for megathrust earthquakes. With large scale damage associated with loss of life and infrastructure, Japan is still in the process of recovery. Official reports from early 20111 suggest fatalities were 15,844 with an additional 3,394 missing (Nobuhito, 2011). The majority of loss of life was attributed to the tsunami, and most fatalities occurred in regions of Tohoku. Specifically, 58% in Miyagi Prefecture, 33% in Iwate Prefecture, and 9% in Fukushima Prefecture (Nobuhito, 2011). Damage to infrastructure (roads, bridges, and buildings) occurred in over 300,000 structures. This damage; however, doesn t account for the Fukushima nuclear meltdowns which occurred shortly after inundation. Response A large surveying project was proposed in the aftermath of the Tohoku event, with hopes of improving earthquake forecasting methods. Because of the rarity of mega earthquakegenerated tsunamis, few surveys have been conducted. The Tohoku earthquake has given researchers the opportunity to study inundation levels, which is the primary source of damage to humans. After the 2011 earthquake and tsunami, a large research survey was conducted over a 2000 km stretch of Japanese coast. More than 5300 sites have been surveyed in an effort to record run up heights and inundation levels. Results show a massive variation in inundation levels, which is due to the complex interaction between tsunami wave propagation and topography.

Inundation and run-up heights were the primary focus of the survey, as they could be accurately recorded to within a few centimeters. Height markers consisted of watermarks present on buildings, trees, and walls. Other markers used for run-up height include landward debris accompanied by seawater marks. The highly populated Sendai plane received a maximum inundation level of 19.5 m, with mean heights closer to 10 m. Results from this survey support the recurrence theory of mega earthquake-generated tsunamis along the subducting Pacific plate boundary. Figure 7: This image quantifies results obtained from the 2011 Tohoku earthquake survey group. Inundation distances are shown by blue colouring of the island, while heights are represented by vertical lines (Mori, 2012). References Chang, Kenneth. "Quake moves Japan closer to US and alters Earth s spin." The New York Times 13 (2011). Nettles, Meredith, Göran Ekström, and Howard C. Koss. "Centroid-moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks." Earth, planets and space 63.7 (2011): 519-523. Ito, Yoshihiro, et al. "Frontal wedge deformation near the source region of the 2011 Tohoku Oki earthquake." Geophysical Research Letters 38.7 (2011).

Ide, Satoshi, Annemarie Baltay, and Gregory C. Beroza. "Shallow dynamic overshoot and energetic deep rupture in the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku- Oki earthquake." Science 332.6036 (2011): 1426-1429. Fujii, Yushiro, et al. "Tsunami source of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake." Earth, planets and space 63.7 (2011): 815-820. Mori, Nobuhito, et al. "Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run up." Geophysical Research Letters 38.7 (2011). Lay, Thorne, et al. "Possible large near-trench slip during the 2011 M w 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake." Earth, planets and space63.7 (2011): 687-692. Ammon, Charles J., et al. "A rupture model of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake." Earth, Planets and Space 63.7 (2011): 693-696. Mori, Nobuhito, and Tomoyuki Takahashi. "Nationwide post event survey and analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami." Coastal Engineering Journal 54.01 (2012): 1250001. Maeda, Takuto, et al. "Significant tsunami observed at ocean-bottom pressure gauges during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake." Earth, Planets and Space 63.7 (2011): 803-808. Shao, Guangfu, et al. "Focal mechanism and slip history of the 2011 M w 9.1 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake, constrained with teleseismic body and surface waves." Earth, planets and space 63.7 (2011): 559-564. "Quake shifted Japan by over two metres". Deutsche Welle. 14 March 2011. Archived from the original on 14 March 2011. Retrieved14 March 2011. "New USGS number puts Japan quake at 4th largest". CBS News. Associated Press. 14 March 2011. Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2011. Ammon, Charles J., et al. "A rupture model of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake." Earth, Planets and Space 63.7 (2011): 693-696. "March 11th tsunami a record 40.5 metres high NHK"..nhk.or.jp. 13 August 2011. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved7 September 2011. Roland Buerk (11 March 2011). "Japan earthquake: Tsunami hits north-east". BBC. Archived from the original on 11 March 2011. Retrieved12 March 2011. "Ring of Fire Pacific Ring of Fire". Geography.about.com. 2010-06-14. Retrieved 2010-11-01. Chang, Kenneth (13 March 2011). "Quake Moves Japan Closer to U.S. and Alters Earth's Spin". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 March 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2011