GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

Similar documents
GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Seismic Design

Di#erences in Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Characteristics between Surface and Buried Crustal Earthquakes

CHARACTERIZING EARTHQUAKE SLIP MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION

CHARACTERISTICS OF NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION OF DHARAMSALA EARTHQUAKE OF 1986

GROUND MOTIONS FROM LARGE EARTHQUAKES (MW³7) ON THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAIN THRUST AND HOLLYWOOD-SANTA MONICA-MALIBU FAULTS

CHARACTERIZATION OF DIRECTIVITY EFFECTS OBSERVED DURING 1999 CHI-CHI, TAIWAN EARTHQUAKE

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

Directivity of near-fault ground motion generated by thrust-fault earthquake: a case study of the 1999 M w 7.6 Chi-Chi earthquake

The effect of bounds on magnitude, source-to-site distance and site condition in PSHA-based ground motion selection

EFFECT OF RANDOM PARAMETERS IN SEMI-EMPIRICAL METHOD ON THE RESULTS OF GROUND MOTION PREDICTIONS

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

Arthur Frankel, William Stephenson, David Carver, Jack Odum, Robert Williams, and Susan Rhea U.S. Geological Survey

Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California

VALIDATION AGAINST NGA EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SIMULATED MOTIONS FOR M7.8 RUPTURE OF SAN ANDREAS FAULT

Characterizing Earthquake Rupture Models for the Prediction of Strong Ground Motion

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project Guidance for Including Near-Fault Effects in Ground Motion Prediction Models

Hazard Feedback using the. current GMPEs for DCPP. Nick Gregor. PG&E DCPP SSHAC Study. SWUS GMC Workshop 2 October 22, 2013

Characterizing Crustal Earthquake Slip Models for the Prediction of Strong Ground Motion

Observed Ground Motions in the 4 September 2010 Darfield and 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes.

ACCOUNTING FOR SITE EFFECTS IN PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS: OVERVIEW OF THE SCEC PHASE III REPORT

Spatial distribution of strong shaking near the 2-D source of large shallow New Zealand earthquakes

Maximum Direction to Geometric Mean Spectral Response Ratios using the Relevance Vector Machine

7 Ground Motion Models

Source and Ground Motion Models for Australian Earthquakes

EFFECTS OF RUPTURE DIRECTIVITY ON PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Norman A. Abrahamson 1

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

SURFACE WAVES AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Relation of Pulse Period with Near-Fault Strong Motion Parameters

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE FOR SITE- SPECIFIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS USED IN US BUILDING CODES

SIMULATING STRONG GROUND MOTION FROM COMPLEX SOURCES BY RECIPROCAL GREEN FUNCTIONS ABSTRACT

Updated Graizer-Kalkan GMPEs (GK13) Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization SSHAC Level 3 Workshop 2 Berkeley, CA October 23, 2013

STRONG GROUND MOTION PARAMETERS OF FEBRUARY 22, 2005 DAHUIYEH (ZARAND) EARTHQUAKE IN CENTRAL IRAN

A Prototype of Strong Ground Motion Prediction Procedure for Intraslab Earthquake based on the Characterized Source Model

Epistemic Uncertainty in Seismic Hazard Analysis for Australia

(Somerville, et al., 1999) 2 (, 2001) Das and Kostrov (1986) (2002) Das and Kostrov (1986) (Fukushima and Tanaka, 1990) (, 1999) (2002) ( ) (1995

A Statistical Analysis of the Response of Tall Buildings to Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions

Ground Motion Prediction Equation Hazard Sensitivity Results for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Site (PVNGS)

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

NEXT GENERATION ATTENUATION (NGA) EMPIRICAL GROUND MOTION MODELS: CAN THEY BE USED IN EUROPE?

Updated NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Active Tectonic Regions Worldwide

Developing ENA GMPE s Using Broadband Synthe=c Seismograms from Finite- Fault Simula=ons

Synthetic Seismicity Models of Multiple Interacting Faults

Selection of Ground Motion Records for Two Dam Sites in Oregon

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA

Strong Ground Motion Prediction of Future Large Earthquake from Niavaran Fault in Tehran, Iran by Finite Fault Method

Deterministic Generation of Broadband Ground Motions! with Simulations of Dynamic Ruptures on Rough Faults! for Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Analysis

CAMPBELL-BOZORGNIA NEXT GENERATION ATTENUATION (NGA) RELATIONS FOR PGA, PGV AND SPECTRAL ACCELERATION: A PROGRESS REPORT

Spatial distribution of ground shaking

RECIPE FOR PREDICTING STRONG GROUND MOTIONS FROM FUTURE LARGE INTRASLAB EARTHQUAKES

UPDATED GRAIZER-KALKAN GROUND- MOTION PREDICTION EQUATIONS FOR WESTERN UNITED STATES

STUDY ON THE BI-NORMALIZED EARTHQUAKE ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRA

Synthetic Near-Field Rock Motions in the New Madrid Seismic Zone

RECORD OF REVISIONS. Page 2 of 17 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.06, Rev. 0

GROUND MOTION SPECTRAL INTENSITY PREDICTION WITH STOCHASTIC GREEN S FUNCTION METHOD FOR HYPOTHETICAL GREAT EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE NANKAI TROUGH, JAPAN

Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

Scenario Earthquake Shaking Maps in Japan

Overview of Seismic PHSA Approaches with Emphasis on the Management of Uncertainties

SEISMIC HAZARD AND DESIGN BY USING ENERGY FLUX

Comparisons of ground motions from the M 9 Tohoku earthquake with ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes

Seismic hazard modeling for Bulgaria D. Solakov, S. Simeonova

(Seismological Research Letters, July/August 2005, Vol.76 (4): )

Introduction to Strong Motion Seismology. Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company SSA/EERI Tutorial 4/21/06

Incorporating simulated Hikurangi subduction interface spectra into probabilistic hazard calculations for Wellington

DCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center

Ground Motion Prediction Equations: Past, Present, and Future

Associate Professor, Dept. of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian. China

NGA-Subduction: Development of the Largest Ground Motion Database for Subduction Events

STUDYING THE IMPORTANT PARAMETERS IN EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION BASED ON STOCHASTIC FINITE FAULT MODELING

Occurrence of negative epsilon in seismic hazard analysis deaggregation, and its impact on target spectra computation

CONTROLLING FACTORS OF STRONG GROUND MOTION PREDICTION FOR SCENARIO EARTHQUAKES

Figure Locations of the CWB free-field strong motion stations, the epicenter, and the surface fault of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake.

A SUMMARY OF STRONG GROUND MOTIONS OBSERVED IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE

Time-varying and long-term mean aftershock hazard in Wellington

A SPECTRAL ATTENUATION MODEL FOR JAPAN USING DIGITAL STRONG MOTION RECORDS OF JMA87 TYPE

EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERS, SMALL EARTHQUAKES

High-Frequency Ground Motion Simulation Using a Source- and Site-Specific Empirical Green s Function Approach

Project 17 Development of Next-Generation Seismic Design Value Maps

A Summary of Strong Ground Motions Observed in the Canterbury, New Zealand earthquake Sequence

THE USE OF INPUT ENERGY FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT WITH DIFFERENT DUCTILITY LEVEL

Modifications to Risk-Targeted Seismic Design Maps for Subduction and Near-Fault Hazards

Scenario Earthquakes for Korean Nuclear Power Plant Site Considering Active Faults

Usability of the Next Generation Attenuation Equations for Seismic Hazard Assessment in Malaysia

A STUDY ON SITE-SPECIFIC STRONG GROUND MOTION FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT DESIGN OF THE HANSHIN EXPRESSWAY LONG-SPAN BRIDGES IN OSAKA BAY AREA

A GEOTECHNICAL SEISMIC SITE RESPONSE EVALUATION PROCEDURE

Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

SEISMIC CODE ISSUES IN CENTRAL UNITED STATES

Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction- Zone Earthquakes in Northern Taiwan

Damping Scaling of Response Spectra for Shallow CCCCCCCCCrustalstallPaper Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Title Line Regions 1 e 2

Development of Procedures for the Rapid Estimation of Ground Shaking Task 7: Ground Motion Estimates for Emergency Response Final Report

STRENGTH AND ENERGY DEMANDS FROM THE AUGUST 1999 KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS. A. Sari 1 and L. Manuel 2 ABSTRACT

Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Shear Velocity in Urban Basins

FINSIM---a FORTRAN Program for Simulating Stochastic Acceleration Time Histories from Finite Faults

Beyond Sa GMRotI : Conversion to Sa Arb, Sa SN, and Sa MaxRot

CHARACTERIZATION OF EARTHQUAKE SHAKING EFFECTS

Root-mean-square distance and effects of hanging wall/footwall. Wang Dong 1 and Xie Lili 1,2

Transcription:

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING Prepared for the PEER Methodology Testbeds Project by Paul Somerville and Nancy Collins URS Corporation, Pasadena, CA March 7, Site Conditions The site condition is classified as NEHRP category S D based on blow count data. This report describes ground motion time histories for S D soil conditions. Uniform Hazard Spectra Uniform hazard spectra for the site were derived from the USGS probabilistic ground motion maps for rock site conditions (Frankel et al., 996; ). Modification to account for near fault rupture directivity effects, and the use of separate response spectra for the fault normal and fault parallel components of ground motion, is not be required, for the reasons stated below. Soil spectra were generated from the rock site spectra by multiplying the rock spectra by the ratio of soil to rock spectra for the Abrahamson and Silva (997) ground motion model. These ratios are for the mode magnitude and distance combinations from the deaggregation of the hazard, listed in Table. Table. Equal Hazard Response Spectra for the Van Nuys building Van Nuys - % in years Period Rock Soil..8....6...9.....7.79.8....88.87......7

Van Nuys - % in years Period Rock Soil..68.9...89...99..77.76...9.8.7.98..8.86...... Van Nuys - % in years Period Rock Soil..989.698..898...6.9...87..7.98.8.7.67..9...7.97...79 Deaggregation of the Hazard The deaggregation of the hazard shows that the hazard at the site is dominated by nearby earthquakes. The higher ground motions for the % in year probability level than for the % in year level will reflect not larger magnitudes, but higher ground motion levels for the same magnitude (larger number of standard deviations above the median). Table. Deaggregation of Uniform Hazard Spectra, % damping, soil, East (Transverse) Sa at seconds, at the Van Nuys building Hazard Level Earthquake Source M mean R mean % in years Santa Susana, Northridge blind thrust 6.7 km % in years Northridge blind thrust, Santa Susana 6.7 km % in years Northridge blind thrust, Santa Susana 6.7 km

Representation of Near Fault Rupture Directivity Effects in the Ground Motion Recordings Although the site is located near active faults in map view, none of the faults that dominate the seismic hazard at the site are oriented in such a way that the site will experience strong rupture directivity effects. For example, the fault that caused the 99 Northridge earthquake is located about km below the site, but it dips up to the northnortheast and focuses forward rupture directivity toward the northern part of the San Fernando Valley. Suitable recordings do not include the recordings of the Northridge earthquake from the northern San Fernando Valley and the Santa Clarita basin, because they all contain strong forward rupture directivity effects. The longitudinal axis of the building is oriented east-west and the transverse axis is oriented north-south. We used the east-west and north-south components of the recordings to represent the longitudinal and transverse components of ground motion respectively. Process of Selecting Ground Motion Recordings The recordings satisfy the magnitude and distance criteria from the deaggregation, and the recording site criterion of S D. Additional criteria are that the earthquake have a thrust mechanism, including blind thrust mechanisms (like the 99 Northridge earthquake), and that the recording not contain strong forward rupture directivity effects. Suitable earthquakes include the 97 San Fernando, 986 North Palm Springs, 997 Whittier Narrows, and 99 Northridge earthquakes. Site Effects in the Ground Motion Recordings All of the selected recordings are from soil sites. Much better representations of appropriate site effects could be made in the selection of time histories, for example by using recordings from sites with comparable seismic velocity profiles, if there were seismic velocity data at the site (as exists for the ROSRINE sites). Scaling of the Ground Motion Recordings For each set of recordings, a scaling factor was found by matching the east component time history to the longitudinal uniform hazard spectrum at a period of. sec. This scaling factor was then applied to all three components of the recording. This scaling procedure preserves the relative scaling between the three components of the recording. Process of Selecting Ground Motion Recordings The recordings listed in Tables, and were selected to satisfy to the extent possible the magnitude and distance combinations from the deaggregation listed in Table. All of the recordings are from thrust earthquakes in the Los Angeles region. In most cases, the selected recordings are from earthquakes having appropriate magnitudes and distances.

Detailed information on the characteristics of the most of the recording sites is not known. Time Histories for % in years The time histories used to represent the % in year ground motions are listed in Table. These time histories are derived from the 97 San Fernando, 986 North Palm Springs, 987 Whittier Narrows, and 99 Northridge earthquakes. Time Histories for % in years The time histories used to represent the % in year ground motions are listed in Table. These time histories are derived from the 97 San Fernando and 99 Northridge earthquakes. Time Histories for % in years The time histories used to represent the % in year ground motions are listed in Table. With the exception of the Van Nuys recording of the 97 San Fernando earthquake, all of these time histories are from the 99 Northridge earthquake. Variability in the Ground Motion Recordings The variability in the ground motion recordings for each component for each ground motion level is shown in Figures and for the horizontal and vertical components respectively. These figures show the median and plus and minus one standard deviation level for each set of ten recordings. The scaling causes the variability to go to zero for the longitudinal component at. seconds. Comparison of Scaled Recording Spectra with the Uniform Hazard Spectra Figures through show the longitudinal and transverse response spectra averaged over the ten recordings for the three ground motion levels. For all three ground motion levels, the average response spectra of the longitudinal and transverse components of the recordings are similar to each other, and they are also similar to the uniform hazard response spectra at periods longer than. seconds. At periods shorter than. seconds, the average response spectra of the recordings are larger than the uniform hazard spectra.

Table. Time histories representing % in years hazard level at the Van Nuys Building Earthquake North Palm Springs 986.7.8 Northridge 99..7 San Fernando 97..9 Whittier Narrows 987.. Mw, Strike ( o E of N) 6. 87 6.7 6.6 Station Distance Site Scale Reference plma 9.6 soil.9 Hartzell (989) env 7.7 soil. env9 7.9 soil.9 nhl 8. soil.69 vnsc.8 soil.7 whox. soil.76 6. soil.7 66 6. soil.6 9 vnuy 9. soil.76 6. 8 Wald et al. (996) Heaton (98) athl 6.6 soil.88 Hartzell and Iida (99) Table. Time histories representing % in years hazard level at the Van Nuys Building Earthquake Northridge 99..7 San Fernando 97..9 Mw, Strike ( o E of N) 6.7 6.6 9 Station Distance Site Scale Reference cnpk 7.7 soil.8 spva 9. soil.7 vnsc.8 soil.96 vnuy. soil. whox. soil.9 6. soil.7 6 6. soil.7 66 6. soil.87 glen 8.8 soil.8 vnuy 9. soil.88 Wald et al. (996) Heaton (98)

Table. Time histories representing % in years hazard level at the Van Nuys building Earthquake Northridge 99..7 San Fernando 97..9 References Mw, Strike ( o E of N) 6.7 6.6 9 Station Distance Site Scale Reference env 7.7 soil. env9 7.9 soil.96 nhl 8. soil.9 nord 9. soil.6 nrr.7 soil.98 rosc.8 soil.9 spva 9. soil.6 vns.8 soil.6 Wald et al. (996) vnuy. soil.99 vnuy 9. soil. Heaton (98) Abrahamson, N.A. and W.J. Silva (997). Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68, 9-7. Frankel, A., et al., 996. USGS National Seismic Maps: Documentation. USGS Open File Report 96-. Somerville, P.G. (). Characterizing near fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridges. Proceedings of the Third National Seismic Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways. This paper is posted on the testbed website. Somerville, P.G. (). Magnitude scaling of near fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, -. Somerville, P.G., H. Krawinkler and B. Alavi (). Development of improved ground motion representation and design procedures for near-fault ground motions. Final Report to CSMIP Data Utilization Program, Contract No. 97-6. Somerville, P.G., K. Irikura, R. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, T. Kagawa, N. Smith and A. Kowada (999). Characterizing earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seismological Research Letters 7, 9-8. Somerville, P.G., N.F. Smith, R.W. Graves, and N.A. Abrahamson (997). Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seismological Research Letters 68, 99-.

Response Spectral Average of Scaled Horizontal Accelerations Longitudinal Transverse Median Median ± Sigma Target % in yrs % in yrs % in yrs Figure. Variability in the ground motions of each set of ten scaled recordings for the longitudinal and transverse components for each of three ground motion levels.

Response Spectral Average of Scaled Vertical Accelerations Median Median ± Sigma % in yrs % in yrs % in yrs Figure. Variability in the ground motions of each set of ten scaled recordings for the vertical component for each of three ground motion levels.

................. Longitudinal Transverse Target Figure. Comparison of the longitudinal and transverse response spectra averaged over the ten scaled recordings for the % in year ground motion level.

................. Longitudinal Transverse Target Figure. Comparison of the longitudinal and transverse response spectra averaged over the ten scaled recordings for the % in year ground motion level.

................. Longitudinal Transverse Target Figure. Comparison of the longitudinal and transverse response spectra averaged over the ten scaled recordings for the % in year ground motion level.