Wellsgate Terrace SPECIFICATIONS.

Similar documents
City of Thornton Attn: Tim Semones Development Engineeering 9500 Civic Center Dr. Thornton, CO 80229

September 6, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

Hydrology Study Report

CITY OF CAPE CORAL STORMWATER MASTER PLAN PHASE II - PART 1 BASINS 4, 10, & 14 SUB-BASIN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Appendix B Equations and Examples

DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

Stage Discharge Tabulation for Only Orifice Flow

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

Pressure Head: Pressure head is the height of a column of water that would exert a unit pressure equal to the pressure of the water.

WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR PAGE ESTATES

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Drainage Study for Civic Center Way

U-Shaped Sediment Traps

PRELIMINARY CULVERT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR CULVERT NO. 008-C OREGON AVENUE OVER PINEHURST CREEK

EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE

******************* Project Description ******************* File Name... NAAF Stormwater Improvement Project 11_21_2014.SPF

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Eastlake Assited Living & Memory Care

HYDROLOGY REPORT Tentative Tract No. 5978

D. B. G R A Y E N G I N E E R I N G I N C.

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Stormwater Drainage Design Report. Reeve & Associates, Inc. Maverik, Inc. 88th Avenue and Pecos Street. Thornton, CO

3301 East 120 th Avenue Assited Living & Memory Care

B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

88 MODERN SEWER DESIGN

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Coal Combustion Residuals Unit Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Villages at Riverdale Carriage Homes Thornton, CO

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS. Mount Prospect

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610)

Coarse Sediment Traps

Lecture 10: River Channels

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

APPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION

Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological Performance and Suspended Solids

SERVICING BRIEF & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Colonial Road Sarsfield (Ottawa), Ontario. Report No June 15, 2017

A HYDROLOGIC STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ON STORM RUNOFF: A CASE STUDY IN QUEENS, NY ABSTRACT

DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS

STORMWATER REPORT FRITO LAY SUBDIVISION NO. 3

CONSTRUCTION EXIT SEDIMENT BARRIER

City of Columbia BMP Manual. Detailed Unified Sizing Criteria Example Wet Pond Design

Chutes Part 5: Rock linings

5. ROADSIDE AND MEDIAN CHANNELS

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Urban Drainage: Hydraulics. Solutions to problem sheet 2: Flows in open channels

HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST C (Proposal to create lots as of 9/12/2007)

Background. Valley fills Sites in the Area. Construction over Mine Spoil Fills

ROCK EXCAVATION (GRADING) OPSS 206 INDEX

Culvert and Pipe Phasing

Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments

Appendix D2: Geotechnical Engineering

Photographic Log. Photo No. 1. Date: 10/27/15. Direction Photo Taken: Southwest. Photo Taken By: JBH1

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University

ARTICLE 5 (PART 2) DETENTION VOLUME EXAMPLE PROBLEMS

Franklin County Engineer's Office - Highway Design Dublin Road And Fishinger Road Improvements Rebid Bid Tabulation

Woodford County Erosion Prevention Plan and Permit. Application #

Type 1 System Sheet Flow Sandy Soils Type 2 System Concentrated Flow Clayey Soils Type 3 System [1] Supplementary Trap Dispersive Soils

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

CITY OF PERRIS FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 May 12, 2015

Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO

Rock Sizing for Waterway & Gully Chutes

How & Where does infiltration work? Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION

Construction Exits Vibration grids

Project Description. Project Options. End Analysis On... Apr 26, :00:00. Rainfall Details

Erosion Surface Water. moving, transporting, and depositing sediment.


Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION

Basic Hydraulics June 2007

Appendix C Benchmarking Cost Estimates

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

APPENDIX B DRAINAGE REPORT

Sediment Weirs (Instream)

Drainage Analysis. Appendix F

BROADSTONE VANTAGE POINT APARTMENTS NE corner of S. Parker Road, and E. Cottonwood Drive Parker, Colorado

Rock Sizing for Small Dam Spillways

Rock Sizing for Batter Chutes

HYDRAULIC EFFICIENCY OF GRATE AND CURB INLETS FOR URBAN STORM DRAINAGE

Stormwater Inlet Sediment Traps

APPENDIX E GREATER SPRINGFIELD RELIABILTIY PROJECT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR THE NEWGATE/PHELPS ROAD AND THE HATCHETT HILL ROAD AREAS

Rucker Pond. Background

1.060 Engineering Mechanics II Spring Problem Set 8

Table of Contents Project Description... 1 Summary of Existing Conditions... 1 Summary of Proposed Conditions... 1 Stormwater Compliance... 2 Collecti

Basic Hydraulics. Rabi H. Mohtar ABE 325

Map Reading 101: Using and Reading Maps and Plans

CIE4491 Lecture. Hydraulic design

ATTACHMENT A. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Tamiami Trail East Ochopee, FL 34141

Specifications Whitcomb Elementary School Demolition January 15, 2016

Stormwater Capacity Analysis for Westover Branch Watershed

Chapter Introduction EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. Erosion

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

**Temporary Erosion Control**

Preliminary Hydraulic Report

Transcription:

GRADING NOTES: 1. LOT GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED TO PROVE SUFFICIENT DIRT ON EACH PAD TO ACHIEVE THE CRITICAL PAD GRADES AND SPOT GRADES ON EACH LOT. AFTER ACHIEVING CRITICAL PAD GRADES INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO UNIFORMLY FILL ALL PADS UNTIL THE PREFERRED PAD GRADE IS MET OR FILL PAD GRADES IN PRIORITY LOCATIONS AS INDICATED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 2. COMPACTION PERFORMED IN STREETS SPECIFICATIONS. SHALL BE PER CITY STANDARD 3. REMOVE TOPSOIL IN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND PAD AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 4". PLACE TOPSOIL IN FRONT AND BACKYARD AREAS AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE ASSUMED TO BE 8.5" ABOVE FINISHED PAD ELEVATIONS. 5. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVE PAD COMPACTION TESTING FOR EACH 8" LIFTS AT THE RATE OF ONE RANDOM TEST AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR EVERY FOUR PADS. 6. TOLERANCES FOR GRADING ARE: FINAL GRADING STREETS ±0.1' PADS ±0.1' 7. GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSAL OFF-SITE OF ALL EXCAVATED AND CLEARED MATERIAL WHICH SOILS LAB DECLARES UNSUITABLE FOR USE ON-SITE. 8. CONTRACTOR TO SLOPE THE ADJACENT GROUND AWAY FROM BUILDING PAD TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANDY EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY IF SA MATERIALS WERE REMOVED DURING THE DAY FOR EASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR ACCESS. 10. IF ROCK IS ENCOUNTERED IN THE STREET SUB-GRADE, THE ROCK SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF SIX INCHES, REMOVED FOR THE STREET, AND NON-ROCK MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED FOR THE STREET SUB-GRADE, ROCK IN STREET PARKWAYS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH SIX INCHES OF TOP SOIL. THIS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR, SUBSIARY TO THE CONTRACT. 11. ALL EXCAVATED SWALES (EXCEPT BETWEEN PAD SWALES), DITCHES, AND GRADE TO DRAIN AREAS ARE TO BE HYDROMULCHED IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH VEGETATION. THE COST OF PERFORMING THIS WORK IS SUBSIARY TO THE COST OF THE EXCAVATION. \\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\grpl01.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:27:45 AM, rkh 12. LOTS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN DESIGNATED WITH PAD ELEVATIONS WILL BE GRADED BY THE FUTURE HOME BUILDER. THE HOME BUILDER SHALL PROVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE FOUNDATION AND THE DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIRECTED TO AND ALONG PROPERTY LINES AT A MINIMUM OF 1.0%. -16 6 2 9

NOTES: 1. ALL SEWALKS CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL OPEN AREAS AND ALL ADA RAMPS WILL BE AT DEVELOPERS EXPENSE AND CONSTRUCTED WITH THESE PLANS. 2. ALL SEWALKS CONSTRUCTED ALONG SINGLE FAMILY LOTS WILL BE AT BUILDERS EXPENSE. 3. THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN IN THE PAVING PLAN-PROFILE REPRESENTS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS REFLECTED ON APPROPRIATE DESIGNED SHEETS. 4. PARKWAYS TO BE GRADED AT 1/4"/FOOT TOWARD STREET FROM BACK OF CURB TO RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. \\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\pvppwl01.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:28:15 AM, rkh

NOTES: 1. ALL SEWALKS CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL OPEN AREAS AND ALL ADA RAMPS WILL BE AT DEVELOPERS EXPENSE AND CONSTRUCTED WITH THESE PLANS. 2. ALL SEWALKS CONSTRUCTED ALONG SINGLE FAMILY LOTS WILL BE AT BUILDERS EXPENSE. 3. THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN IN THE PAVING PLAN-PROFILE REPRESENTS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS REFLECTED ON APPROPRIATE DESIGNED SHEETS. 4. PARKWAYS TO BE GRADED AT 1/4"/FOOT TOWARD STREET FROM BACK OF CURB TO RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. \\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\pvpptc01.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:28:41 AM, rkh

NOTES: 1. ALL SEWALKS CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL OPEN AREAS AND ALL ADA RAMPS WILL BE AT DEVELOPERS EXPENSE AND CONSTRUCTED WITH THESE PLANS. 2. ALL SEWALKS CONSTRUCTED ALONG SINGLE FAMILY LOTS WILL BE AT BUILDERS EXPENSE. 3. THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN IN THE PAVING PLAN-PROFILE REPRESENTS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS REFLECTED ON APPROPRIATE DESIGNED SHEETS. 4. PARKWAYS TO BE GRADED AT 1/4"/FOOT TOWARD STREET FROM BACK OF CURB TO RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. \\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\pvpptc02.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:29:15 AM, rkh

\\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\damp01.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:29:46 AM, rkh

From Line A To From Station Pipe Reach To Station Distance Between s No. Incr. Drainage Data Incr. "CA" CA Time of Concentration Inlet Time Travel Time Time Freq. Rainfall STORM DRAIN HYDRAULICS Selected Size of Pipe Upstream Downstrm Velocity In Velocity Out Velocity Head In Velocity Head Out Headloss Kj * V(in)^2 / 2g (ft.) (ac.) (ac.) (min) (min) (min) (in./hr.) (in.) (ft./ft.) (MSL) (MSL) (fps) (fps) (ft.) (ft.) Kj (ft.) (ft.) (MSL) 3 4 6+15.76 5+34.31 81.45 -- 0.00 12.17 0.00 0.00 6.08 8.97 0.03 9.00 100 9.57 58.21 36 0.012 0.016 694.44 693.50 n/a 8.23 n/a 1.05 0.50 n/a 0.53 694.97 690.50 689.97 4 5 5+34.31 4+60.34 73.97 -- 0.00 12.17 0.00 0.00 6.08 9.00 0.16 9.16 100 9.57 58.21 36 0.012 0.016 692.97 691.84 8.23 8.23 1.05 1.05 0.50 0.53 0.53 693.50 689.97 689.48 5 6 4+60.34 2+49.79 210.55 -- 0.00 12.17 0.00 0.00 6.08 9.16 0.15 9.31 100 9.57 58.21 42 0.005 0.016 691.53 689.58 8.23 6.05 1.05 0.57 0.25 0.26 0.31 691.84 688.98 687.62 6 7 2+49.79 0+35.00 214.79 -- 0.00 12.17 0.00 0.00 6.08 9.31 0.58 9.89 100 9.57 58.21 42 0.005 0.016 689.30 686.03 6.05 6.05 0.57 0.57 0.50 0.28 0.28 689.58 687.62 682.68 7 8 0+35.00 0+00.00 35 -- 0.00 12.17 0.00 0.00 6.08 9.89 0.59 10.48 100 9.57 58.21 60 0.001 0.016 686.03 686.00 6.05 2.96 0.57 0.14 0.25 0.14 0.00 686.03 681.18 681.00 Slope of Friction Gradient Manning's n-value Hydraulic Gradient Elevations Head Loss At Change In Section Headloss H.G. Elev. At Invert Elevations Incoming Pipe Outgoing Pipe Lat A1 1 3 0+15.01 0+00.00 15.01 1/2 D1 6.08 6.08 0.50 3.04 3.04 8.97 -- 8.97 100 9.57 29.10 24 0.025 0.016 695.35 694.97 n/a 9.26 n/a 1.33 1.25 n/a 1.67 697.02 691.90 690.50 Lat A2 2 3 0+15.01 0+00.00 15.01 1/2 D1 6.08 6.08 0.50 3.04 3.04 8.97 -- 8.97 100 9.57 29.10 24 0.025 0.016 695.35 694.97 n/a 9.26 n/a 1.33 1.25 n/a 1.67 697.02 691.90 690.50 Station Type Flood (Yrs) DA "I" "A" Street Flow per Side Q S Carryover Q CO INLET CALCULATIONS - ON GRADE CURB INLETS (100-YEAR) per Side Q T Street Capacity per Side Section Width (F-F) Crown Height Section Parabolic (P) Straight (S) Crown Slope S X (ft/ft) Reciprocal of Crown Slope S x Street Slope S O (ft/ft) Width of Spread S P Depth of Flow Y O Q/L O (cfs/ft) L O = Q O Q/L O L L/L O Q/Q O Q O x Q = 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7 9 11 10 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 0+15.01 20' Curb Inlet 100 1/2 D1 0.50 9.57 6.08 29.10 0.00 29.10 45.6 30 0.30 S 0.0200 50 0.023 15.00 0.46 1.00 29.23 20.0 0.68 0.78 22.70 6.40 Bypass to Sump Inlet 2 0+15.01 20' Curb Inlet 100 1/2 D1 0.50 9.57 6.08 29.10 0.00 29.10 45.6 30 0.30 S 0.0200 50 0.023 15.00 0.46 1.00 29.23 20.0 0.68 0.78 22.70 6.40 Bypass to Sump Inlet 1 0+15.01 20' Curb Inlet 10 1/2 D1 0.50 6.77 6.08 20.59 0.00 20.59 22.9 30 0.30 S 0.0200 50 0.023 15.00 0.40 0.99 20.72 20.0 0.97 0.98 20.18 0.41 Bypass to Sump Inlet 2 0+15.01 20' Curb Inlet 10 1/2 D1 0.50 6.77 6.08 20.59 0.00 20.59 22.9 30 0.30 S 0.0200 50 0.023 15.00 0.40 0.99 20.72 20.0 0.97 0.98 20.18 0.41 Bypass to Sump Inlet Q/Q O Carryover Station Type Flood (Yrs) DA INLET CALCUATIONS - SUMP INLETS (100-YEAR) "I" "A" Street Flow Q S Carryover 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Q CO Flow Q T Street Capacity per Side L Weir (W) Orifice (O) Flow Weir Flow Head Orifice Flow Head 5 4+60.34 10' Curb Inlet 100 -- -- -- -- 0.00 12.81 12.81 45.6 10.00 W 0.57 0.28 0.57 Sag Depth ation ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA COMPUTATIONS "A" "CA" Time of Conc. (min) "I" 10yr Q 10yr "I" 25yr Q 25yr "I" 100yr Q 100yr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A 0.50 25.68 12.84 13.5 5.78 74.3 6.74 86.6 8.31 106.7 B1 0.50 17.52 8.76 9.2 6.70 58.7 7.76 68.0 9.48 83.1 B2 0.50 19.73 9.86 13.2 5.84 57.6 6.81 67.2 8.38 82.7 C1 0.61 18.77 11.54 15.6 5.43 62.7 6.35 73.3 7.84 90.6 C2 0.64 21.18 13.54 18.6 5.00 67.7 5.87 79.4 7.28 98.5 D1 1, 2 0.50 12.17 6.08 9.0 6.77 41.2 7.83 47.6 9.57 58.2 D2 0.50 4.56 2.28 10.8 6.33 14.4 7.35 16.7 9.01 20.5 Comments ation "A" PRE-PROJECT DRAINAGE AREA COMPUTATIONS "CA" Time of Conc. (min) "I" 10yr Q 10yr "I" 25yr Q 25yr "I" 100yr Q 100yr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A 0.45 25.68 11.56 13.5 5.78 67.4 6.74 78.6 8.31 96.8 B1 0.46 17.52 8.06 10.7 6.36 51.7 7.38 60.0 9.05 73.5 B2 0.37 26.00 9.62 13.2 5.84 56.7 6.81 66.0 8.38 81.3 C1 0.30 18.77 5.63 15.6 5.43 30.8 6.35 36.0 7.84 44.5 C2 0.37 20.27 7.50 18.6 5.00 37.8 5.87 44.4 7.28 55.0 D 0.35 11.48 4.02 11.1 6.26 25.4 7.27 29.5 8.92 36.2 Comments ation "A" POST-PROJECT DRAINAGE AREA COMPUTATIONS "CA" Time of Conc. (min) "I" 10yr Q 10yr "I" 25yr Q 25yr "I" 100yr Q 100yr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A 0.45 25.68 11.56 13.5 5.78 67.4 6.74 78.6 8.31 96.8 B1 0.46 17.52 8.06 9.2 6.70 54.5 7.76 63.0 9.48 77.1 B2 0.39 19.73 7.69 13.2 5.84 45.3 6.81 52.8 8.38 65.0 C1 0.30 18.77 5.63 15.6 5.43 30.8 6.35 36.0 7.84 44.5 C2 0.38 21.18 8.05 18.6 5.00 40.6 5.87 47.6 7.28 59.1 D1 0.46 12.17 5.60 9.0 6.77 38.2 7.83 44.2 9.57 54.0 D2 0.48 4.56 2.19 10.8 6.33 14.0 7.35 16.2 9.01 19.9 Comments \\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\hcsh01.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:30:22 AM, rkh

\\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\sdppma01.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:30:45 AM, rkh -16 6 2 9

\\Vaultserver\LDC2009\JOBS\201340\DS\SH\SDPPMB01.dwg, 9/27/2016 8:20:29 AM, rkh

\\vaultserver\ldc2009\jobs\201340\ds\sh\sdpr01.dwg, 9/26/2016 8:31:51 AM, rkh