Software Verification

Similar documents
Software Verification

Software Verification

Introduction. ENCE 710 Design of Steel Structures IV. COMPOSITE STEEL-CONCRET CONSTRUCTION. Effective Width. Composite Action

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Masonry Beams. Ultimate Limit States: Flexure and Shear

fib Model Code 2020 Shear and punching provisions, needs for improvements with respect to new and existing structures

Compression Members Local Buckling and Section Classification

Design of AAC floor slabs according to EN 12602

WRAP-AROUND GUSSET PLATES

Two-Way Flat Slab (Concrete Floor with Drop Panels) System Analysis and Design

Ch. 10 Design of Short Columns Subject to Axial Load and Bending

Wood Design. = theoretical allowed buckling stress

RC DEEP BEAMS ANALYSIS CONSIDERING LOCALIZATION IN COMPRESSION

Reinforced Concrete Design

Max. thick. of part to be fixed. Min. thick. of base material. anchor depth. Anchor mechanical properties

Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York

Reinforced Concrete Design

Bending resistance of high performance concrete elements

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)

The Hashemite University Department of Civil Engineering ( ) Dr. Hazim Dwairi 1

EFFECTS OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCEMENT ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF HEADED STUD SHEAR CONNECTORS FOR COMPOSITE STEEL-CONCRETE BEAMS

FORCE DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COUPLING BEAMS WITH DIAGONAL REINFORCEMENT

STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR OF R/C DEEP BEAM WITH HEADED LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENTS

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS

Uniaxial Concrete Material Behavior

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection

NON-LINEAR BENDING CHARACTERISTICS OF PHC PILES UNDER VARYING AXIAL LOAD

BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE CONCRETE-FILLED TUBULAR COLUMNS UNDER ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION WITH DOUBLE CURVATURE DEFLECTION

Reinforced Concrete Design

Reinforced Concrete Design

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

The Serviceability Considerations of HSC Heavily Steel Reinforced Members under Bending

Purpose of reinforcement P/2 P/2 P/2 P/2

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture

Two-Way Concrete Floor Slab with Beams Design and Detailing (CSA A )

thirteen wood construction: column design ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Composite Beams DYB 654: ADVANCED STEEL STRUCTURES - II. Department of Earthquake and

BEAMS: SHEARING STRESS

A.1. Member capacities A.2. Limit analysis A.2.1. Tributary weight.. 7. A.2.2. Calculations. 7. A.3. Direct design 13

Software Verification


STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

Chapter 6. Compression Reinforcement - Flexural Members

Rectangular Filament-Wound GFRP Tubes Filled with Concrete under Flexural. and Axial Loading: Analytical Modeling ABSTRACT


A Time-Dependent Model For Predicting The Response Of A Horizontally Loaded Pile Embedded In A Layered Transversely Isotropic Saturated Soil

Torsion. Torsion is a moment that twists/deforms a member about its longitudinal axis

Assignment 1 - actions

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

Three Dimensional FE Model of Stud Connected Steel-Concrete Composite Girders Subjected to Monotonic Loading

1. INTRODUCTION. l t t r. h t h w. t f t w. h p h s. d b D F. b b d c. L D s

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames. Virtual Work for Frames

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

RESULTS OF PSEUDO-STATIC TESTS WITH CYCLIC HORIZONTAL LOAD ON R.C. PANELS MADE WITH WOOD-CONCRETE CAISSON BLOCKS

PREDICTING THE SHEAR STRENGTH OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Software Verification

OUTLINE. CHAPTER 7: Flexural Members. Types of beams. Types of loads. Concentrated load Distributed load. Moment

Shear Strength of Squat Reinforced Concrete Walls with Flanges and Barbells

A NORMALIZED EQUATION OF AXIALLY LOADED PILES IN ELASTO-PLASTIC SOIL

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Software Verification

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Flexural Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Wall with Limited Confinement

Moment Curvature Characteristics for Structural Elements of RC Building

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

Drift Capacity of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Columns

Flexural Strength Design of RC Beams with Consideration of Strain Gradient Effect

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Advances in Engineering Research, volume 93 International Symposium on Mechanical Engineering and Material Science (ISMEMS 2016)

THE EQUATION CONSIDERING CONCRETE STRENGTH AND STIRRUPS FOR DIAGONAL COMPRESSIVE CAPACITY OF RC BEAM

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at

Mechanics of Structure

Shear-Friction Strength of RC Walls with 550 MPa Bars

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

Heat exchangers: Heat exchanger types:

SHEAR CONNECTION: DESIGN OF W-SHAPE BEAM TO RECTANGULAR/SQUARE HSS COLUMN SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION

Strength of Materials

STATISTICAL MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF HIGH STRENGTH REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS

Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

ŽILINSKÁ UNIVERZITA V ŽILINE. Fakulta stavebná BRIDGES. Examples. Jozef GOCÁL

GENERAL GEOMETRY LEFT SIDE BEAM RIGHT SIDE BS :2000/AC:2009. Ratio 0.17

P1.2 w = 1.35g k +1.5q k = = 4.35kN/m 2 M = wl 2 /8 = /8 = 34.8kN.m V = wl /2 = /2 = 17.4kN

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

Part G-4: Sample Exams

Failure Assessment Diagram Analysis of Creep Crack Initiation in 316H Stainless Steel

TECH BULLETIN. SIP No. Subject: Engineering Properties. Date: March 2011 (Revised January 2015)

Nonlinear Finite Element Flexural Analysis of RC Beams

Transcription:

EC-4-004 Example-001 STEEL DESIGNERS MANUAL SEVENTH EDITION - DESIGN OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED COMPOSITE BEAM EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION Consider an internal seondary omposite beam of 1-m span between olumns and subjet to uniform loading. Choose a UKB457x191x74 in S 355 steel. GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING EC-4-004 Example-001-1

Member Properties UKB457x191x74 E = 05,000 MPa fy = 355 MPa Loading w = 8.43kN/m (Dead Load) w =.5kN/m (Constrution) w = 1.5kN/m (Superimposed Load) w = 15.00kN/m (Live Load) Geometry Span, L = 1 m Beam spaing, b =3 m TECHNICAL FEATURES OF ETABS TESTED Composite beam design, inluding: Seletion of steel setion, amber and shear stud distribution Member bending apaities, at onstrution and in servie Member defletions, at onstrution and in servie RESULTS COMPARISON Independent results are referened from the first example, Design of Simply Supported Composite Beam, in Chapter of the Steel Constrution Institute Steel Designer s Manual, Seventh Edition. Output Parameter ETABS Independent Perent Differene Constrution MEd (kn-m) 50.4 50.4 0.00% Constrution Ma,pl,Rd (kn-m) 587 587 0.00% Constrution Defletion (mm) 3.5 3.5 0.00% Design Moment (kn-m) 68.4 68.4 0.01% Full Composite Mp (kn-m) 100 100 0.00% Partial Composite M (kn-m) 971. 971. 0.00% Shear Stud Capaity PRd Input 5.0 NA Shear Stud Distribution 77 76 1.3% Live Load Defletion (mm) 19.3 19.1 1.03% EC-4-004 Example-001 -

Output Parameter ETABS Independent Perent Differene Required Strength VEd (kn) 09.5 09.5 0.00% Vpl,Rd (kn) 843 843 0.00% COMPUTER FILE: EC-4-004 EXAMPLE 001.EDB CONCLUSION The ETABS results show an aeptable omparison with the independent results. The shear stud apaity Pr was entered as an overwrite, sine it is ontrolled by the dek profile geometry and the exat geometry of the example, whih assumes a dek profile with a rib depth of 60 mm, a depth above profile of 60 mm and a total depth of 130 mm, annot be modeled in ETABS, sine in ETABS, only the rib depth and depth above profile an be speified. EC-4-004 Example-001-3

HAND CALCULATION Properties: Materials: Setion: Dek: S 355 Steel: E = 10,000 MPa, fy = 355 MPa, partial safety fator γa = 1.0 Normal weight onrete lass C5/30: Em = 30,500 MPa, fu = 30 MPa, density w = 4 kn/m 3 UKB457x191x74 ha = 457 mm, bf = 190.4 mm, tf = 14.5 mm, tw = 9 mm, Aa = 9,460 mm, Iay = 33,319 m 4, Wpl = 1,653 m 3 Slab depth hs =130 mm, depth above profile h = 60 mm, Dek profile height hp = 60 mm, hd = hp + 10 mm for re-entrant stiffener, sr = 300 mm, b0 = 150 mm Shear Connetors: Loadings: d = 19 mm, h = 95 mm, Fu = 450 MPa Self weight slab, deking, reinforement =.567 kn/m Self weight beam = 0.73 kn/m Constrution load = 0.75 kn/m Ceiling = 0.5 kn/m Partitions (live load) = 1.0 kn/m Oupany (live load) = 4.0 kn/m EC-4-004 Example-001-4

Design for Pre-Composite Condition: Constrution Required Flexural Strength: w fatored onstrution = 1.5 (.567 3.0 + 0.73) + 1.5 0.75 3.0 = 13.91 kn/m M Ed Moment Capaity: wfatored onstrution L 13.91 1 = = = 50.4 kn-m 8 8 M W f 3 6 a, pl, Rd = pl d = 1,653 10 355 10 = 587 kn-m Pre-Composite Defletion: w onstrution =.567 3.0 + 0.73 = 8.43 kn/m 5 w L 5 8.43 1,000 4 4 onstrution δ= = = 4 384 E Iay 384 10,000 33,319 10 3.5 mm Camber = 0.8 δ= 6 mm, whih is rounded down to 5 mm Design for Composite Flexural Strength: Required Flexural Strength: w fatored = 1.5 0.73 + (1.5.567 + 1.5 0.5 + 1.5 1+ 1.5 4.0) 3.0 = 34.91 kn/m wfatored L 34.91 1 M Ed = = = 68.4 kn-m 8 8 Full Composite Ation Available Flexural Strength: Effetive width of slab: L 1 b eff = = = 3 m 8 8 Resistane of slab in ompression: 0.85 fk 3 R = beff h = 0.85 (5 /1.5) 3, 000 60 10 =,550 kn ontrols γ Resistane of steel setion in tension: R = f A = = s yd a 3 355 9, 460 10 3,358 kn EC-4-004 Example-001-5

Depth of ompression blok within steel setion flange: Rs R 3,358,50 x = = = 6 mm b f 190.4 355 f yd d = x/ = 0.73 in. The plasti axis is in the steel flange and the moment resistane for full omposite ation is: h h h ( Rs R ) t f Ma, pl, RD = Rs d +R hs - R 4 453.6 60 (3,358,550) 14.5 = 3,358 10 +,550 130 10 10 980 4 = 100.0 kn-m Partial Composite Ation Available Flexural Strength: Assume 77.5% omposite ation: R q = 0.775 R = 0.775 3,358 = 1,976 kn Tensile Resistane of web: s f 3 3 3 R = t D t p = = 3 w w ( f ) y 8.5 (453.6 1.7) 355 10 1, 9 kn As Rq > Rw, the plasti axis is in the steel flange, and h Rq h ( Rs Rq) t f M = Rs + Rq hs R Rf 4 453.6 1,976 60 (3,358 1,976) 14.5 = 3,358 10 + 1,976 130 10 10, 50 980 4 = 971. kn-m Resistane of Shear Connetor: Resistane of shear onnetor in solid slab: 3 3 3 d h 95 PRd = 0.9 α d fk Em γv 0.8 fu π γv with α =1.0 for = > 4 4 d 19 3 0.9 α k m γ v = 0.9 1.0 19 5 30,500 10 1.5 = 73 kn d f E ontrols EC-4-004 Example-001-6

d 19 v 0.8 f u π γ =0.8 450 π 1.5 = 81.7 kn 4 4 Redution fator for deking perpendiular to beam assuming two studs per rib: 0.7 k ( 0 ) ( ) 1 t = b hp hs hp 0.75 per EN 1994-1-1 Table 6. n r 0.7 150 = ( 95 60 ) 1 = 0.7 0.75 60 P = 0.7 73 = 5 kn Rd Total resistane with two studs per rib and 19 ribs from the support to the mid-span: R = 19 5 = 1,976 kn q Live Load Defletion: The seond moment of area of the omposite setion, based on elasti properties, I is given by: I 3 Aa ( h+ hp + h) beff h = + + I 4 (1 + n r) 1 n Aa 9, 460 r = = = 0.05 b h 3, 000 60 eff n = modular ratio = 10 for normal weight onrete subjet to variable loads I 3 9, 460 (457 + 70 + 60) 3, 000 60 = + + 33,30 10 4 (1 + 10 0.05) 1 10 = (6.69 + 0.05 + 3.33) 10 = 10.08 10 mm ay 8 8 4 5 w L 5 15 (1, 000) δ = = = 19.1 mm 4 4 live live 8 384 E I 384 10, 000 10.08 10 4 EC-4-004 Example-001-7

Design for Shear Strength: Required Shear Strength: V Ed wfatored L 34.91 1 = = = 09.5 kn Shear Resistane of Steel Setion: 457 9.0 355 = = 843 kn 3 10 V pl, Rd 3 EC-4-004 Example-001-8