Retrieving hits through in silico screening and expert assessment M. N. Drwal a,b and R. Griffith a

Similar documents
Introduction to Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery

Development of Pharmacophore Model for Indeno[1,2-b]indoles as Human Protein Kinase CK2 Inhibitors and Database Mining

Data Quality Issues That Can Impact Drug Discovery

Receptor Based Drug Design (1)

In silico pharmacology for drug discovery

Dispensing Processes Profoundly Impact Biological, Computational and Statistical Analyses

Computational chemical biology to address non-traditional drug targets. John Karanicolas

In Silico Investigation of Off-Target Effects

Dr. Sander B. Nabuurs. Computational Drug Discovery group Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics Radboud University Medical Centre

Ligand Scout Tutorials

Data Analysis in the Life Sciences - The Fog of Data -

Mechanistic insight into inhibition of two-component system signaling

Using AutoDock for Virtual Screening

FRAUNHOFER IME SCREENINGPORT

Different conformations of the drugs within the virtual library of FDA approved drugs will be generated.

Early Stages of Drug Discovery in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Chemical library design

Next Generation Computational Chemistry Tools to Predict Toxicity of CWAs

Computational Chemistry in Drug Design. Xavier Fradera Barcelona, 17/4/2007

Using Phase for Pharmacophore Modelling. 5th European Life Science Bootcamp March, 2017

Bioengineering & Bioinformatics Summer Institute, Dept. Computational Biology, University of Pittsburgh, PGH, PA

Virtual affinity fingerprints in drug discovery: The Drug Profile Matching method

October 6 University Faculty of pharmacy Computer Aided Drug Design Unit

LigandScout. Automated Structure-Based Pharmacophore Model Generation. Gerhard Wolber* and Thierry Langer

Biologically Relevant Molecular Comparisons. Mark Mackey

Virtual Screening: How Are We Doing?

Enamine Golden Fragment Library

Structural biology and drug design: An overview

QSAR Modeling of ErbB1 Inhibitors Using Genetic Algorithm-Based Regression

Using Bayesian Statistics to Predict Water Affinity and Behavior in Protein Binding Sites. J. Andrew Surface

Introduction. OntoChem

QSAR Study of Quinazoline Derivatives as Inhibitor of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase (EGFR-TK)

Medicinal Chemistry/ CHEM 458/658 Chapter 4- Computer-Aided Drug Design

EMPIRICAL VS. RATIONAL METHODS OF DISCOVERING NEW DRUGS

DOCKING TUTORIAL. A. The docking Workflow

Chemogenomic: Approaches to Rational Drug Design. Jonas Skjødt Møller

Fondamenti di Chimica Farmaceutica. Computer Chemistry in Drug Research: Introduction

Plan. Lecture: What is Chemoinformatics and Drug Design? Description of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and its used in Chemoinformatics.

Introduction to FBDD Fragment screening methods and library design

Principles of Drug Design

Cross Discipline Analysis made possible with Data Pipelining. J.R. Tozer SciTegic

Joana Pereira Lamzin Group EMBL Hamburg, Germany. Small molecules How to identify and build them (with ARP/wARP)

Ping-Chiang Lyu. Institute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, Department of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University.

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY: CURRENT APPROACH

György M. Keserű H2020 FRAGNET Network Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Targeting protein-protein interactions: A hot topic in drug discovery

Virtual Libraries and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery Processes using KNIME

Structural Bioinformatics (C3210) Molecular Docking

Reaxys Medicinal Chemistry Fact Sheet

CHAPTER-2. Drug discovery is a comprehensive approach wherein several disciplines

Sigma Xi Undergraduate Research Grant Proposal Analysis of the Oligomerization of Ɣ-Glutamylcysteine Ligase

Progress of Compound Library Design Using In-silico Approach for Collaborative Drug Discovery

Synthetic organic compounds

Cheminformatics platform for drug discovery application

Driving Serendipity: the Era of Active Ingredients Discovery. Valentina Sedini Scientific Marketing

Statistical concepts in QSAR.

Docking. GBCB 5874: Problem Solving in GBCB

COMPARISON OF SIMILARITY METHOD TO IMPROVE RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE FOR CHEMICAL DATA

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy-JPET#172536

Comparative Analysis of Pharmacophore Screening Tools

Implementation of novel tools to facilitate fragment-based drug discovery by NMR:

Ignasi Belda, PhD CEO. HPC Advisory Council Spain Conference 2015

Advanced Medicinal Chemistry SLIDES B

CHAPTER 3. Pharmacophore modelling studies:

Organic Synthesis III x 1hr Lectures: Michaelmas Term Weeks 5-8 Tues; Thrs at 10am Dyson Perrins lecture theatre

Principles of Drug Design

Design and Synthesis of the Comprehensive Fragment Library

5.1. Hardwares, Softwares and Web server used in Molecular modeling

Supplementary Information. Broad Spectrum Anti-Influenza Agents by Inhibiting Self- Association of Matrix Protein 1

Unlocking the potential of your drug discovery programme

Life Science Webinar Series

MSc Drug Design. Module Structure: (15 credits each) Lectures and Tutorials Assessment: 50% coursework, 50% unseen examination.

Identifying Interaction Hot Spots with SuperStar

MM-GBSA for Calculating Binding Affinity A rank-ordering study for the lead optimization of Fxa and COX-2 inhibitors

Keywords: anti-coagulants, factor Xa, QSAR, Thrombosis. Introduction

High Throughput In-Silico Screening Against Flexible Protein Receptors

Cheminformatics Role in Pharmaceutical Industry. Randal Chen Ph.D. Abbott Laboratories Aug. 23, 2004 ACS

DivCalc: A Utility for Diversity Analysis and Compound Sampling

Structure based drug design and LIE models for GPCRs

QSAR of Microtubule Stabilizing Dictyostatins

Chemoinformatics and information management. Peter Willett, University of Sheffield, UK

Data Mining in the Chemical Industry. Overview of presentation

User Guide for LeDock

Supplementary Methods

ESPRESSO (Extremely Speedy PRE-Screening method with Segmented compounds) 1

BioSolveIT. A Combinatorial Approach for Handling of Protonation and Tautomer Ambiguities in Docking Experiments

Free Energy. because H is negative doesn't mean that G will be negative and just because S is positive doesn't mean that G will be negative.

Structure-based maximal affinity model predicts small-molecule druggability

Structure-Based Drug Discovery An Overview

Virtual screening for drug discovery. Markus Lill Purdue University

How IJC is Adding Value to a Molecular Design Business

Supplementary Material

Plan. Day 2: Exercise on MHC molecules.

Society for Biomolecular Screening 10th Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, September 11-15, 2004

Can we predict good drugs?

Supporting Information

CHAPTER-5 MOLECULAR DOCKING STUDIES

Drug Informatics for Chemical Genomics...

has its own advantages and drawbacks, depending on the questions facing the drug discovery.

Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology

Transcription:

Retrieving hits through in silico screening and expert assessment M.. Drwal a,b and R. Griffith a a: School of Medical Sciences/Pharmacology, USW, Sydney, Australia b: Charité Berlin, Germany Abstract: A strategy will be presented involving combination of ligand- and structure-based drug design methods to retrieve structurally novel compounds through virtual screening of large chemical databases. In particular, various pharmacophore methods (ligand-based, complex-based and structure-based) form an integral part of this strategy and will be discussed. It will be shown that the combination of pharmacophores, docking, and expert assessment can be successfully applied in database screening to retrieve structurally novel compounds as topoisomerase I and II inhibitors. [1-3] References: [1] M.. Drwal, et al.: Development of purely structure-based pharmacophores for the topoisomerase I-DA- ligand binding pocket. J Comput-Aided Mol Des, 27, 1037-1049, 2013. [2] M.. Drwal, R. Griffith: Combination of Ligand- and Structure-Based Methods in Virtual Screening. Drug Discov Today: Tech, 10, 395-401, 2013. [3] M.. Drwal, et al.: Exploring DA Topoisomerase I Ligand Space in Search of ovel Anticancer Agents. PLoS E, 6(9), e25150, 2011.

Background oncovalent complex Rotation Covalent complex Topoisomerases are validated anticancer drug targets: overexpressed in tumour cells Topo I covalent complex is vulnerable to trapping by agents intercalating between DA base pairs at cleavage site + forming interactions with the protein (poisons) Ternary complex: protein-da-drug Main group of topo I poisons: camptothecin (CPT) derivatives used clinically Topo II enzymes induce DA double-strand breaks Poisons trap DA/topo II complexes Topo II poisons used in the clinic, all exhibit severe side effects: etoposides, anthracyclines (doxorubicin), anthraquinones (mitoxantrone), acridines (amsacrine)

Methodology What is a hit and why do we want to retrieve hits? Hits in a drug discovery program: molecules with activity against drug target µm affinity for a receptor or µm inhibitory activity against an enzyme usually retrieved through high throughput screening (HTS) in silico or in vitro The ideal hit: structurally novel, accessible to chemical synthesis and modification drug-like properties promise of selectivity: has been counter-screened against an off-target How do we retrieve such hits? General methodology: stepwise in silico screening of large databases with pharmacophores expert assessment of resulting lists docking of selected molecules selection of a small number of molecules for biological testing

Pharmacophores for Discovery and Design of Bioactive Small Molecules Classical or LIGAD-BASED: 3D pattern of features explaining biological activity of a series of small molecules = TRAIIG SET features: hydrogen bond donors/acceptors, hydrophobic groups assumption: same binding mode, same binding site Receptor- or CMPLEX-BASED describe interactions observed in a 3D structure of a complex between a small molecule and its target STRUCTURE-BASED describe potential interactions in the binding pocket Pharmacophores extremely useful: design of new or modified bioactive molecules fast in silico database mining

Ligand-Based Pharmacophores for Topo I Inhibitors R R Selection of training set (27 compounds) Definition of CyPi feature Generation of pharmacophore models (Catalyst) R R Camptothecin derivatives IC 50 values from DA topo I cleavage assay, performed by the same lab, spanning 4 orders of magnitude Selection based on structural or functional diversity (if possible) Most topo I inhibitors intercalate into the cleaved DA π-interactions important Software used ( Catalyst, now in Discovery Studio, Accelrys) has no π-interaction feature Extension of aromatic feature definition of CyPi feature Model 1 Model 2 Correlation: 0.96 Stat. significance: 99 % H Correlation: 0.94 Stat. significance: 99 % Features used: HBA, HBD, hydrophobic, CyPi, excluded volumes (max. 5) H

Complex-Based Pharmacophores Two X-ray structures of topo I DA camptothecin derivative complexes available and used for identification of ligand interactions camptothecin, PDB: 1t8i topotecan, PDB: 1k4t Generation of pharmacophore: interactions present in both crystal structures used averaged features placement of excluded volumes to mimic the shape of binding pocket placement of additional excluded volume for discrimination between active/inactive stereoisomers of CPT Lys425 2.910 Thr718 3.531 3.253 H Arg364 Asp533 Lys532 ligand-protein interactions ligand-da interactions

Screening of a Virtual Database, Selection of Hits CI database: 240 000 compounds Screening with ligand-based pharmacophores: 7175 hits Screening with complex-based pharm. (no excl. vol.): 3474 hits Druglikeness filter: 1763 hits Excl. volumes added to complex-based pharmacophore (mimic shape of pocket): 746 hits Generation 1 compounds 21.0% with confirmed anticancer activity Positive control: 2.7 % camptothecin derivatives Generation 2 compounds 14.6 % with confirmed anticancer activity Positive control: 6.2 % camptothecin derivatives Top 20 of generation 1 and generation 2 hit lists inspected individually, selected according to criteria: not a camptothecin derivative not tested for topo I inhibition dissimilar to compounds already selected 22 compounds selected and docked (round 1) Assessment based on a combination of criteria: docking score comparable to control small number of clusters intercalation between DA bases at cleavage site hydrogen bonds to protein formed 6 compounds eliminated in round 1: failed more than one criterion 9 compounds survived round 2: passed all criteria Requested for biological testing, 7 available

Biological Assays - Conclusions DA cleavage assay to determine topo I inhibition (K. Agama a ; Y. Pommier a ) 3 -radiolabelled DA substrates-da-topo I-potential inhibitor incubated denaturation, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis o direct correlation between activity and docking score or rank in hitlist 5 out of 7 tested compounds active = 71 % hit rate Hit rate difficult to assess: top scoring compounds not available compounds with known activity or similar to camptothecins not tested Structurally novel topoisomerase I inhibitors found, some are also toxic to cancer cell lines ewsflash: unpublished results topo II inhibitors identified using very similar strategies (J. Marinello b ; J. Capranico b ) a: Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, ational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA b: Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology Bologna University, Bologna, Italy