Quantization of Non-abelian Gauge Theories: BRST symmetry

Similar documents
8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

A Remark on BRST Singlets

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 23 Mar 2015

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14.

BRST renormalization

1 Path Integral Quantization of Gauge Theory

Jackiw-Pi Model: A Superfield Approach

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 18 Mar 2001

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

An exact result for the behavior of Yang-Mills Green functions in the deep infrared region

FROM SLAVNOV TAYLOR IDENTITIES TO THE ZJ EQUATION JEAN ZINN-JUSTIN

arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 7 Jun 2013

Local cohomology, master equation and renormalization of higher-derivative and nonlocal quantum gravity

QCD Green Functions:

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

Elementary realization of BRST symmetry and gauge fixing

arxiv:hep-th/ Feb 2001

Advanced Quantum Gauge Field Theory. P. van Nieuwenhuizen

Remarks on Gauge Fixing and BRST Quantization of Noncommutative Gauge Theories

Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model

Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, A-1040 Wien, Austria. Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Wien, Austria

Finite-temperature Field Theory

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 28 Nov 2000

Massive Gauge Field Theory without Higgs Mechanism

A Note On The Chern-Simons And Kodama Wavefunctions

Complete action of open superstring field theory

Superfield Approach to Abelian 3-form gauge theory. QFT 2011 (23 27 Feb. 2011) [IISER, Pune]

HOMOLOGICAL BV-BRST METHODS: FROM QFT TO POISSON REDUCTION

On the QCD of a Massive Vector Field in the Adjoint Representation

Solution set #7 Physics 571 Tuesday 3/17/2014. p 1. p 2. Figure 1: Muon production (e + e µ + µ ) γ ν /p 2

Non decoupling ghosts in the light cone gauge.

Feynman Rules of Non-Abelian Gauge Theory

PHY 396 K. Problem set #11, the last set this semester! Due December 1, 2016.

Generalized*Gauge*Theories* in*arbitrary*dimensions

Refined chiral Slavnov-Taylor identities: Renormalization and Local Physics

The Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local Gauge Transformations Dynamics of Field Ten

9 Quantization of Gauge Fields

The Jackiw-Pi model and all that...

Spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking by an antisymmetric tensor field. Citation Physical Review D. 64(2) P

Introduction to the Idea of Twisted SUSY Nonlinear Sigma Model

A Higgs Mechanism for Gravity

Będlewo. October 19, Glenn Barnich. Physique théorique et mathématique. Université Libre de Bruxelles & International Solvay Institutes

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 6 Apr 1999

(3 + 1)-Dimensional topologically massive 2-form gauge theory: geometrical superfield approach

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

Théorie des cordes: quelques applications. Cours II: 4 février 2011

The BRST antifield formalism. Part II: Applications.

Show, for infinitesimal variations of nonabelian Yang Mills gauge fields:

15.2. Supersymmetric Gauge Theories

The Mathematical Structure of the Quantum BRST Constraint Method

Attempts at relativistic QM

INTRODUCTION TO BRS SYMMETRY

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 13 Aug 2003

Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2

Magnetofluid Unification in the Yang-Mills Lagrangian

Lagrangian. µ = 0 0 E x E y E z 1 E x 0 B z B y 2 E y B z 0 B x 3 E z B y B x 0. field tensor. ν =

1 Polyakov path integral and BRST cohomology

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 25 Jan 2001

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Supersymmetric field theories

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 27 Mar 2009

4 QUANTIZATION OF GAUGE THEORIES

Stony Brook THE BIG PICTURE. N. Berkovits, M.T. Hatsuda, and W. Siegel 1

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 2010 Lecture 3

Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 13 Feb 1992

PoS(QCD-TNT09)036. The Electroweak Model based on the Nonlinearly Realized Gauge Group

The Klein-Gordon equation

arxiv:hep-th/ v5 14 Sep 2007

Gauge Theory on a Lattice

Problem 1(a): As discussed in class, Euler Lagrange equations for charged fields can be written in a manifestly covariant form as L (D µ φ) L

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 May 1998

1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime

CHAPTER II: The QCD Lagrangian

Reφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f

etc., etc. Consequently, the Euler Lagrange equations for the Φ and Φ fields may be written in a manifestly covariant form as L Φ = m 2 Φ, (S.

By following steps analogous to those that led to (20.177), one may show (exercise 20.30) that in Feynman s gauge, = 1, the photon propagator is

J.W. van Holten a. Nikhef, Amsterdam and Lorentz Institute, Leiden University. July 28, 2017

A UNITARY AND RENORMALIZABLE THEORY OF THE STANDARD MODEL IN GHOST-FREE LIGHT-CONE GAUGE 1. Prem P. Srivastava a,b,c 2. Stanley J.

The Dirac Propagator From Pseudoclassical Mechanics

The boundary state from open string fields. Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba. March 9, 2009 at Nagoya

Perturbative Quantum Gravity and Yang-Mills Theories in de Sitter Spacetime

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Maxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 16 Aug 1996

Duality between constraints and gauge conditions

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Nov 2005

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 7 Nov 2018

g abφ b = g ab However, this is not true for a local, or space-time dependant, transformations + g ab

Chapter 13. Local Symmetry

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 13 Sep 2001

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Advanced Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 1

First order string theory and the Kodaira-Spencer equations. Integrable Systems in Quantum Theory Lorentz Center, Leiden, December 2008

PHYSICS 218 PROBLEM SET #2 BEN LEHMANN

Cross-sections. Kevin Cahill for 524 January 24, There are two standard ways of normalizing states. We have been using continuum normalization

Aula/Lecture 18 Non-Abelian Gauge theories The Higgs Mechanism The Standard Model: Part I

Transcription:

Quantization of Non-abelian Gauge Theories: BRST symmetry Zhiguang Xiao May 9, 2018

:Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin The gauge fixed Faddeev-Popov Lagrangian is not invariant under a general gauge transformation, though the path integral is invariant. L FB = 1 4 (Fi µν) 2 + i ψd/ψ m ψψ c a c a gf abc c a µ (A b µc c ) 1 2ξ ( µ A a µ) 2 There is a residue symmetry: To see this, we introduce an auxiliary field B: No kinetic term of B, and can be integrated out to obtain the L FB. L BRST = 1 4 (Fi µν) 2 + i ψd/ψ m ψψ c a µ D ac µ c c + ξ 2 (Ba ) 2 + B a µ A a µ Path integral: [db][d ψ][dψ][da µ][dc][d c] exp{i d 4 xl BRST } ξ 2 (Ba ) 2 + B a µ A a µ = ξ 2 (Ba + 1 ξ µ A a µ) 2 1 2ξ ( µ A a µ) 2 EOM of B a : B a = 1 ξ ( µaaµ )

L BRST L YM c a µ D ac µ c c + ξ 2 (Ba ) 2 + B a µ A a µ The L BRST has a Global BRST symmetry: infinitesimal parameter ϵ, an anticommuting grassman number, independent of x. BRST transformation and classical BRST operator Q: (iϵ, c a, i c a are real grassman variables, Hermite conjuate for grassman number (χψ) = ψ χ ) δa a µ =ϵd ac µ c c ϵqa a µ, δψ =igϵc a t a ψ ϵqψ, δ ψ = igϵc a ψt a ϵq ψ, δc a = 1 2 gϵfabc c b c c ϵqc a, δ c a =ϵb a ϵq c a, δb a =0 ϵqb a. Q =D ac µ c c δ (y) δa a µ(y) + igca t a ijψα(y) j δ δψα(y) i igca ψj α (y)t a δ ji δ ψ α(y) i 1 2 gfabc c b c c δ (y) δc a (y) + δ Ba (y) δ c a (y) (repeated indices are summed, including continuous indices y.) Ex. (1) Q 2 = 0.

L BRST L YM c a µ D ac µ c c + ξ 2 (Ba ) 2 + B a µ A a µ The transformation of A µ and ψ is just a gauge transformation with parameter :α a (x) = gϵc a (x), L YM is invariant. δ(b a µ A a µ) = B a µ (ϵd ac µ c c ) δ( c( µ D ac µ c c )) = ϵb a }{{} δ c ( µ (D ac µ c c ) c a µ D ac µ 1 c 2 gϵfcb c b c c ) }{{} δc c = + gϵ c a µ ( ) g c a µ ((ϵd be µ c e )f abc c c ) }{{} δa b f abc ( ) = 1 2 µ(fab c c b c c ) 1 2 gad µf adc f cb c c b c c + ( µc b )f abc c c + ga d µf bde c e f abc c c =ga d µ( 1 2 fadc f cb c + f cdb f acc )c b c c =ga d µ( 1 2 fadc f cb c 1 2 fb dc f cc a 1 2 fc dc f cab )c b c c = 0

It can be proved that Q 2 = 0, Q carry ghost number 1. Grassman odd operator. The L BRST can be recast into L BRST = L YM[A, ψ] + QΨ; Ψ = c a µ A a µ + ξ 2 ca B a L YM[A, ψ] is the gauge invariant Yang-Mills Lagrangian. In general, for gauge fixing G a [A µ] = f a (A µ) ω a (x), Ψ = c a f a [A µ] + ξ 2 ca B a. QΨ = B a f a [A µ] c a δf a [A µ] δa b µ(y) Dbc c c (y) + ξ 2 Ba B a (repeated indices are summed, including continuous indices y.) Now the invariance of L BRST is BRST invariant can be seen easily: (1)Since the BRST trans for A µ and ψ is just a special gauge transformation with parameter :α a (x) = gϵc a (x), L YM is invariant. δ BRST L YM = ϵql YM = 0 (2) Since Q 2 = 0, δ BRST QΨ = Q 2 Ψ = 0.

In the whole fock state space, including unphysical polarization and ghost excitations, we can define a hermitian operator ( quantum operator) Q, From Q 2 ϕ = 0, we have δ BRST ϕ = ϵqϕ = i[ϵq, ϕ] [Q, [Q, ϕ] ±] = Q 2 ϕ = 0 [Q 2, ϕ] = Q 2 ϕ ϕq 2 = 0 for any ϕ. Either Q 2 = 0 or Q 2 = I, Q 2 ghost charge = 2, it can not be I. So Q 2 = 0. We want to identify the physical states in the fock state space, in a Lorentz covariant way. The physical amplitude should be invariant under the change of the gauge fixing function, changing of the gauge, or changing of ξ an arbitrary change of the Ψ, δψ. 0 = δ α ph β ph = i α ph Q δψ β ph = α ph [Q, δψ] + β ph Because δψ is arbitrary, the only possibility is: Q Phy states = 0. For any physical state α ph, we can not physically distingush it from α ph + Q γ, (γ any fock state), since β ph α ph + Qγ = β ph α ph + β ph Q γ = β ph α ph + Qβ ph γ = 0

Physical state: { Physical state condition:q Phy states = 0 α ph α ph + Q γ The whole fock space is divided into 3 parts: H 0, H 1, H 2: H 0: α 0, Q α 0 = 0, but α 0 = Q γ, H ph is a subspace of H 0. H 1: α 1, Q α 1 = 0. Unphysical states. H 2: α 2 = Q γ. (1) Q α 2 = 0, (2) zero norm: α 2 α 2 = γ Q Q γ = γ Q 2 γ = 0, (3) orthogonal to H 0, α 0 α 2 = α 0 Q γ = Qα 0 γ = 0. BRST closed states: Q α = 0, Kernel of Q BRST exact states: α = Q γ, Image of Q kernel of Q So the physical state space H ph is defined as H ph = { α : Q α = 0} { β = Q γ } = {Kernel of Q} {Image of Q} = Cohomology of Q

(reference Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields, II) Consider the asymptotic particle state, in the t ±, interactions are adiabaticaly turned off g 0. BRST transformation: [Q, A a µ ] = i µca, [Q, c a µ ] + = 0, [Q, c] + = ib a EOM ===== i ξ µaa,µ A µ (x) = c(x) = d 3 k (2π) 3 2E (aµ k e ik x + a µ k eik x ) d 3 k (2π) 3 2E (c ke ik x + c k eik x ), c(x) = d 3 k (2π) 3 2E ( c ke ik x + c k eik x ) [Q, a µ k ] = kµ c k, [Q, c k ] = 1 ξ k a k, [Q, c k ] = 0

[Q, a µ k ] = kµ c k, [Q, c k ] = 1 ξ k a k, [Q, c k ] = 0 The superscript a and subscript k are supressed in the following. A physical state: ψ, satisfies Q ψ = 0. Adding another vector boson, e, ψ = e µa µ ψ. Physical condition: 0 = Q e, ψ = e µk µ c ψ, so k µ e = 0. ( k ϵ + = 0, k ϵ 0. ) for e µ ϵ +µ, k ϵ + = 0, ϵ + µ a µ ψ satisfies Physcal condition. for e µ ϵ µ, k ϵ 0, ϵ µ a µ ψ H 1 is not a physical state. for e µ ϵ Tµ, k ϵ T = 0, ϵ T µa µ ψ satisfies physical condition. Add a ghost: c ψ = Q e, ψ /(e k), (e k 0,) is BRST exact 0, H 2. Q c ψ = 1 ξ kµ a µ ψ, BRST exact, ϵ +µ a µ ψ H 2., e µ + αk µ, ψ = ψ + Qα c ψ e µ, ψ, this is the gauge equivalent condition for the vector boson. Q c ψ = 1 ξ kµ a µ ψ = 0 c ψ is not physical H 1. ϵ T a ψ H 0, c ψ H 1, ϵ a ψ H 1, ϵ + a ψ H 2, c ψ H 2. For each equivalent class of states, we choose ϵ T a ψ to represent the class, H ph can be restricted to states with only transverse polarizations A; tr ϵ T a ψ. So the physical H ph H 0 is ghost free.

We can choose the external polarizations contain only the transverse polarizations. Because the hamiltonian H commutes with Q, then QS = SQ. QS A, tr = SQ A, tr = 0 H ph, S A, tr = C; tr + Qexact. The S matrix in the full fock space is (pseudo-)unitary: S S = S S = 1. ( intermediate states include a set of orthogonal independent basis {C} of the whole fock space H 0 + H 1 + H 2). The restricted S-matrix on the transversely polarized states is also Unitary : S A; tr = C; tr + Q χ, S B; tr = D; tr + Q ψ C; tr = X;tr X; tr X; tr S A; tr, D; tr = X;tr X; tr X; tr S B; tr δ(a, B) = A; tr B; tr = A; tr S S B; tr = C; tr + Qχ D; tr + Qψ = C; tr D; tr = A; tr S X; tr X; tr S B; tr X;tr (See Kugo and Ojima, Prog. Theo. Phys., V60, NO.6 1869 for details.)