arxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 May 1998
|
|
- Oswald Oliver
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SOGANG HEP 223/97, HD THEP Quantization of spontaneously broken gauge theory based on the BFT BFV Formalism Yong-Wan Kim and Young-Jai Park arxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 May 1998 Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute Sogang University, C.P.O.Box 1142, Seoul , Korea and Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Heidelberg Philosophenweg 16, D Heidelberg, Germany Abstract We quantize the spontaneously broken abelian U(1) Higgs model by using the improved BFT and BFV formalisms. We have constructed the BFT physical fields, and obtain the first class observables including the Hamiltonian in terms of these fields. We have also explicitly shown that there are exact form invariances between the second class and first class quantities. Then, according to the BFV formalism, we have derived the corresponding Lagrangian having U(1) gauge symmetry. We also discuss at the classical level how one easily gets the first class Lagrangian from the symmetry-broken second class Lagrangian. PACS: Ef, Ex, q Typeset using REVTEX and 1
2 I. INTRODUCTION Many of the fundamental theories of modern physics can be considered as descriptions of dynamical systems subjected to constraints. The foundations for Hamiltonian quantization of these constrained systems have been established by Dirac [1]. By requiring the strong implementation of second class constraints, however, this method implies Dirac brackets, whose non-canonical structure may pose serious problems on operator level. This makes it desirable to embed the second class theory into a first class one in which the commutator relations remain canonical. An example is provided by the Higgs model with spontaneous symmetry breakdown [2] whose quantization is usually carried out in the so called unitary gauge. As is well known, in this gauge the model is a purely second class system characterized by two sets of the second class constraints [3,4]. The required strong implementation of these constraints leads to non-polynomial field dependent Dirac brackets. As mentioned above, one can circumvent the problems associated with this non-polynomial dependence by turning this system into a first class one with a usual Poisson bracket structure in an extended phase space and implementing the first class constraints on the physical states. A systematic procedure for achieving this has been given by Batalin and Fradkin (BF) [5] and explicitly carried out for the above Higgs model [4]. However, it is already proved that the construction of the first class Hamiltonian in the BF framework is non-trivial even in the abelian case because of the field dependence on the constraint algebra. In this case the only weakly involutive first class Hamiltonian is obtained after the fifth iteration, and thus it does not appear particularly to be suited for treating non-abelian cases. A more systematic and transparent approach for this iterative procedure, called Batalin Fradkin Tyutin (BFT) formalism when combined with the BF one, has been developed by Batalin and Tyutin [6]. This procedure has been applied to several interesting models [7,8], where the iterative process is terminated after two steps. In general, it has been, however, still difficult to apply this BFT formalism to the nonabelian case [9]. On the other hand, we have recently improved the BFT formalism by introducing the novel concept of the BFT physical fields constructed in the extended phase space [10] in order to construct the strongly involutive obsevables including the Hamiltonian. This modified version of the BFT method 2
3 has been successively applied for only finding the first class Hamiltonian of several nontrivial nonabelian models [11 13]. In particular, the origin of the second class constraints of the Higgs model is different from that of the usual Yang-Mills theory [11,12], which is due to the existence of the explicitly symmetry broken mass term. In this paper we shall revisit the spontaneously broken abelian U(1) Higgs model by following the constructive procedure based on the improved BFT version [10]. In section 2, we convert the second class constraints into a first class ones, and construct in section 3 the BFT physical fields in the extended phase space corresponding to the original fields in the usual phase space, following the improved BFT formalism. We then systematically obtain all observables containing the first class Hamiltonian as functionals of the BFT physical fields showing the form invariances between the second class and first class quantities. In section 4, through the standard path integral quantization established by Batalin, Fradkin and Vilkovsky (BFV) [15,16], we derive the gauge invariant Lagrangian. In section 5, we discuss at the classical level how one can easily get this Lagrangian from the original second class one by simply replacing the original fields with the BFT ones through the hidden relation. We summarize in section 6. II. BFT CONSTRUCTION OF FIRST CLASS CONSTRAINTS Consider the abelian U(1) Higgs model in the unitary gauge [3,4], L u = 1 4 F µνf µν g2 (ρ + v) 2 A µ A µ µρ µ ρ + V (ρ), (1) where the subscript u stands for the unitary gauge, the Higgs potential is V (ρ) = 1 2 µ2 (ρ+ v) 2 λ 4 (ρ+v)4, and the field strength tensor F µν = µ A ν ν A µ. The momenta canonically conjugate to A 0, A i and ρ are given by π 0 = 0, π i = F i0, and π ρ = ρ, respectively. We have thus one primary constraint Ω 1 = π 0 0. (2) The canonical Hamiltonian density associated with the Lagrangian (1) is given by H c = 1 2 π2 i π2 ρ F ijf ij 1 2 g2 (ρ + v) 2 ( (A 0 ) 2 (A i ) 2) A 0 i π i ( iρ) 2 V (ρ). (3) 3
4 Persistency in time of Ω 1 leads to one further (secondary) constraint Ω 2 = i π i + g 2 (ρ + v) 2 A 0 0. (4) Then, the constraints Ω i in Eqs. (2) and (4) consist of a second class system because we have the nonvanishing Poisson brackets ij (x, y) {Ω i (x), Ω j (y)} = g 2 (ρ + v) 2 ǫ ij δ 3 (x y), (5) where ǫ 12 = ǫ 12 = 1. We now convert this second class system defined by the commutation relations (5) to a first class one at the expense of introducing additional degrees of freedom. According to the BFT method [6], we first introduce two auxiliary fields Φ i corresponding to Ω i with the Poisson brackets {Φ i (x), Φ j (y)} = ω ij (x, y), (6) where we are free to make a choice ω ij (x, y) = ǫ ij δ 3 (x y). (7) The first class constraints Ω i are then constructed as a power series in the auxiliary fields: where Ω (n) i Ω i = n=0 Ω (n) i ; Ω (0) i = Ω i, (8) are homogeneous polynomials in the auxiliary fields Φ j of degree n, to be determined by the requirement that the first class constraints Ω i be strongly involutive: { Ωi (x), Ω j (y) } = 0. (9) Since Ω (1) i are linear in the auxiliary fields, we could make the ansatz Ω (1) i = d 3 yx ij (x, y)φ j (y). (10) Then, substituting (10) into (9) leads to the following relation d 3 zd 3 z X ik (x, z)ω kl (z, z )X jl (z, y) = ij (x, y). (11) 4
5 For the choice of (7), Eq. (11) has a solution g 2 (ρ + v) 2 0 X ij (x, y) = δ 3 (x y). (12) 0 1 Substituting (12) into (10) as well as (8), and iterating this procedure one finds the strongly involutive first class constraints to be given by Ω 1 = Ω 1 + g 2 (ρ + v) 2 Φ 1, Ω 2 = Ω 2 + Φ 2. (13) This completes the construction of the first class constraints in the extended phase space. III. CONSTRUCTION OF FIRST CLASS OBSERVABLES The construction of the first class Hamiltonian H can be done along similar lines as in the case of the constraints (see the Appendix A). However, we shall follow here a somewhat different path [10] by using the novel property that any functional K( F) of the first class fields F = (õ, π µ, ρ, π ρ ) corresponding to the original fields F = (A µ, π µ, ρ, π ρ ) will also be first class. i.e., K(F; Φ) = K( F). (14) This leads us to the identification H c = H c ( F). To do this, we should first construct first class physical fields F in the extended phase space, which are obtained as a power series in the auxiliary fields Φ j by requiring them to be strongly involutive: { Ω i, F} = 0. Expressions of the strongly involutive F are given by à µ = (A g 2 (ρ + v) 2π θ, A i + i θ), (15) π µ = (π 0 + g 2 (ρ + v) 2 θ, π i ), (16) ρ = ρ, (17) π ρ = π ρ + 2g 2 (ρ + v)a 0 θ. (18) 5
6 Here, for the later convenience, we have identified the auxiliary fields Φ i as a canonically conjugate pair (θ, π θ ) by choosing Φ i = (θ, π θ ), which satisfy the symplectic structure (2.6) with the choice of Eq. (2.7). In order to understand the meaning of these BFT fields, let us now consider the Poisson brackets between the BFT fields in the expended phase space. From the relations of Eqs. (15 18), one can easily calculate the Poisson brackets of the abelian Higgs model as follows {Ã0 (x), Ãi (y)} = 1 g 2 ( ρ + v) 2 i xδ 3 (x y), {Ã0 (x), π ρ (y)} = 2Ã0 ( ρ + v) δ3 (x y), {Ãi (x), π j (y)} = δ i jδ 3 (x y), { ρ(x), π ρ (y)} = δ 3 (x y). (19) Note that these Poisson brackets in the extended phase space have the form invariance as compared with the Dirac brackets in the original phase space, and moreover, if we take the limit of Φ i = (θ, π θ ) 0, the brackets (19) are nothing but the usual Dirac brackets of the abelian Higgs model [3]. On the other hand, we observe that the first class constraints (13) can be written in terms of the BFT physical fields F as Ω 1 = π 0, Ω 2 = i π i + g 2 ( ρ + v) 2 Ã 0, (20) and these constraints also have the form invariance with the second class constraints Ω i in Eqs. (2) and (4). Correspondingly, we take the first class Hamiltonian density H c to be given by the second class one (3), expressed in terms of the physical fields: H c = 1 2 π2 i π2 ρ F ij F ij 1 2 g2 ( ρ + v) 2 ( (Ã0 ) 2 (Ãi ) 2) Ã0 i π i ( i ρ) 2 V ( ρ), (21) and, by construction, Hc = d 3 x H c is automatically strongly involutive { Ω i, H c } = 0. (22) 6
7 It seems approriate to comment on our strongly involutive Hamiltonian (21) derived by using the improved BFT formalism. Making use of (15 18) and (21), we may rewrite H c in the form where H is given by H c = H c + H π θ g 2 (ρ + v) 2 Ω 2, (23) H = 2g 2 (ρ + v)θa 0 ( πρ + g 2 (ρ + v)θa 0 ) g 2 (ρ + v) 2 i θ(a i iθ) + π 2 θ 2g 2 (ρ + v) 2. If we construct our strongly involutive Hamiltonian along similar BFT lines as in the case of the constraints, we obtain this Hamiltonian (23) after only second iterations (see the Appendix A), while the weakly involutive Hamiltonian in ref. [4] derived by using the BF formalism is obtained after the fifth iteration in spite of the abelian case and has rather complicated additional terms given in Eq. (2.29) of ref. [4]. Any Hamiltonian weakly equivalent to (21), however, describes the same physics since the observables of the first class formulation must be first class themselves, and thus these two Hamiltonians are equivalent to each other. Therefore, we can add to H c any terms freely proportional to the first class constraints. In particular, if we choose the simplest Hamiltonian density among infinite equivalent ones: H c = H c + H, (24) then this naturally generates the Gauss law constraint Ω 2 { Ω 1, H } = Ω 2, { Ω 2, H } = 0, (25) and it will be proved to be useful through the following discussion as well as the next section. If we consider this Hamiltonian (24), the form-invariant Hamilton s equations of motion for the physical BFT fields are found to be read à 0 = i à i + π 0 = Ω 2, 2 v)ãi i ρ 2 ( ρ + ( ρ + v) π ρã0, 7
8 à i = π i + i à 0, π i = j Fij g 2 ( ρ + v) 2 à i, ρ = π ρ, π ρ = g 2 ( ρ + v) ( (Ã0 ) 2 + (Ãi ) 2) + i 2 ρ + V ( ρ), (26) where V ( ρ) = V ( ρ). But, if one try to derive the equations of motion from the strongly ρ involutive Hamiltonian (21), one can only obtain the weak relations since as an example the Hamilton s equation of motion for Ãi is reduced to be ( ) à i = π i + i à 0 x i 1 g 2 ( ρ + v) Ω 2 2. As a result, these relations (26) together with Eqs. (20) and (25) confirm the form invariances between the second class quantities in the original phase space and the corresponding first class ones in the extended phase space. IV. CORRESPONDING FIRST CLASS LAGRANGIAN In order to interpret the results presented at the previous sections from the Lagrangian point of view, let us apply the BFV quantization scheme [15,16] to the first class system described by Eqs. (20) and (24). We first introduce ghosts C i, antighosts P i and new auxiliary fields q i with their canonically conjugate momenta P i, C i and p i such that [C i, P j ] = [P i, C j ] = [q i, p j ] = iδj i δ3 (x y), (27) where the subscript i, j = 1, 2, due to having the two constraints in Eq. (20), and from now on we will use the commutators instead of the Poisson brackets. The nilpotent BRST charge Q and the ferminonic gauge fixing function Ψ are then given by Q = d 3 x ( ) C i Ωi + P i p i, Ψ = d 3 x ( C i χ i + P i q i), (28) where χ i are gauge fixing functions satisfying the condition det{χ i, Ω j } 0 [16,17]. The total unitarizing Hamiltonian is then given by 8
9 H T = H m + 1 [Ψ, Q]. (29) i Since we have the involutive relations (25), the minimal Hamiltonian H m is nothing but H m = H c + d 3 xp 2 C 1. (30) The corresponding quantum theory is now defined by the extended phase space functional integral Z I = Dµ I e is I ; ( S I = d 3 x π µ A µ + π ρ ρ + π θ θ + pi q i + C i P i + P i Ċ i ) H T ; Dµ I = DA µ Dπ µ DρDπ ρ DθDπ θ Dq i Dp i DC i DP i DP i DC i. (31) According to the BFV formalism [15,16], Z I is independent of the choice of the gauge fixing functions χ i. By choosing the proper χ i, which do not include the ghosts, antighosts, and auxiliary fields and their conjugate momenta, and taking the limit of β 0 after rescaling the field variables as χ i χ i /β, p i βp i, and C i βc i, one can integrate out all the ghost, antighosts and auxiliary variables in the partition function. As a result, one obtains Z II = Dµ II δ( Ω i )δ(χ j )det[χ, Ω]e is II, (32) where S II is the action in the extended phase space i,j S II = d 4 x ( π µ Ȧ µ + π ρ ρ + π θ θ H c ), (33) and Dµ II is the measure containing all the fields and their conjugate momenta except for the ghosts, antighosts and auxiliary fields in the measure Dµ I. Note that this form of the partition function S II coinsides with the Faddeev-Popov formula [18]. Now, let us perform the momentum integrations to obtain the configuration partition function. In general, if we choose the Faddeev-Popov type gauges in which the gauge fixing conditions χ i only depend on the configuration space variables, one can easily carry out the momentum integrations in the partition function (32). The π 0 integration is trivially performed by exploiting the delta function δ( Ω 1 ), and after exponentiating the remaining delta function δ( Ω 2 ) in terms of a Fourier variable ξ as 9
10 δ( Ω 2 ) = Dξ exp( i d 4 xξ Ω 2 ) and transforming A 0 A 0 + ξ, the integration over the momenta π θ, π ρ and π i leads to Z = DA µ DρDθDξ δ(χ i )det[χ, Ω]det(g(ρ + v))e is GI, (34) i where S GI = ( d 4 x 1 4 F µνf µν + 1 ) 2 [ µ + ig(a µ + µ θ)](ρ + v)[ µ ig(a µ + µ θ)](ρ + v) + V (ρ), and the ξ field in the measure is an artifact which would be removed if we take the gauge fixing function χ i explicitly. This action S GI is now gauge invariant under the transformation (35) A µ A µ + µ Λ, θ θ Λ, ρ ρ. (36) This completes our ananlysis on the BFV quantization scheme. It only remains to establish the equivalence between the above gauge invariant action and the well-known U(1) Higgs model. By defining the complex scalar field φ(x) as φ(x) = 1 2 (ρ(x) + v)e igθ(x) (37) with the BFT field θ playing the role of the Goldstone boson, and replacing the Jacobian factor DθDρ det (g(ρ + v)) in the measure part with DφDφ, we can easily rewrite the partition function (34) with the action (35) as follows Z F = DA µ Dφ Dφ δ(χ i )det{χ, Ω}e is F ; i S F = d 4 x ( 1 ) 4 F µνf µν + (D µ φ) (D µ φ) + µ 2 φ φ λ(φ φ) 2, (38) where D µ = µ iga µ is the covariant derivative. As a result, we have arrived at the well-known U(1) Higgs model, which describes the interaction of the abelian gauge fields A µ with the complex scalar fields φ, through the BFT BFV construction. V. BFT LAGRANGIAN FORMULATION Let us now consider in this section the similar economical method to simply obtain the first class Lagrangian (35) at the classical level. It consists in gauging the Lagrangian (1) 10
11 by making the substitution A µ õ and ρ ρ. The spatial components Ãi among the vector potential components contain only the fields of the configuration space as in Eq. (15), and already take the usual form of the gauge transformation, i.e., à i A i + i θ. However, since the time component Ã0 contains the term of the momentum field π θ as in Eq. (15), we should first replace this term with some ordinary field before carrying out the above substitution. In order to incorporate the Ã0 field at this stage, we use a relation, which has not been recognized up to now. This hidden relation is turned out to be crucial [19] to show the strong involution as like in Ãi when we analyze the non-abelian models [11 13] in which the non-abelian extension of à 0 only provides the weak equivalence with the one obtained in the gauged Lagrangian, up to the first class constraints. From the useful property (14) and the definition of π i, we observe the following relation: π i = i à 0 0 à i ) 1 = i (A 0 + g 2 (ρ + v) 2π θ 0 (A i + i θ). (39) On the other hand, another form of π i is already given in Eq. (16) as follows π i = π i = i A 0 0 A i. (40) Comparing this with Eq. (39), we see that the following hidden relation should be maintained for the consistency all the times 0 θ = 1 g 2 (ρ + v) 2π θ, (41) which make it possible to directly replace the second term of à 0 with 0 θ. As a consequence of this hidden relation, we can now rewrite the Ã0 as the usual form of the gauge transformation as follows à 0 = A θ. (42) Note that the Hamilton s equations (26) can be also used to confirm the relation (41). Therefore, gauging the original Lagrangian (1), i.e., making the substitution à µ A µ + µ θ, ρ ρ, (43) we have directly arrived at the same first class Lagrangian (35) at the classical level, 11
12 L(õ, ρ) = L(A µ, θ, ρ) = L GI, (44) which is already obtained through the standard path integral procedure in the previous section. VI. SUMMARY In this paper, we have quantized the spontaneously broken abelian U(1) Higgs model, which is a phenomenologically interesting and simple toy model, through the BFT BFV quantization procedure. First, according to the improved version [10] of the BFT formalism, we have constructed the BFT physical fields, and proved that the Poisson brackets between these BFT fields naturally contain the structure of the Dirac brackets [3] in the original phase space for the abelian U(1) Higgs model as like in Eq. (19), while maintaining the form invariance in the extended phase space. Second, we have shown that the strongly involutive first class Hamiltonian (21) is directly obtained by replacing the second class fields with the first class BFT ones. Third, after directly obtaining the above Hamiltonian and by choosing the simplest involutive Hamiltonian H c among equivalent infinite ones, we have shown that this H c in Eq. (24) naturally generates the Gauss law constraint, and also gives the strong Hamilton s equations of motion (26). Moreover, we have also shown that there are the exact form invariances between the second class and first class quantities in Eqs. (20, 21) and (26), which give us the deep physical meaning of the BFT fields when we embed a second class system into first class by using the BFT construction. Fourth, we have carried out the BFV quantization procedure in order to interpret the results of the Hamiltonian embedding of the abelian U(1) Higgs model from the Lagrangian point of view, and constructed the gauge invariant Lagrangian corresponding to the first class Hamiltonian. Fifth, by using the novel hidden relation, we have newly shown that one can directly obtain the first class Lagrangian from the second class one by just replacing the original fields with the BFT ones at the classical level, similar to the case of the Hamiltonian. In 12
13 particular, this kind of the BFT Lagrangian construction will be powerful for the analysis of the non-abelian cases, where the non-abelian extension of the Ã0 remains to be weakly involutive to the usual gauge transformation. Note that for the massive Yang-Mills case of Ref. [11], since the authors did not derive the compact form of first class fields, they could not obtain the exact form of the first class Hamiltonian. As a result, the first class Lagrangian corresponding to this Hamiltonian also could not be directly derived through the standard path integral quantization. In fact, the physical first class fields consist of the sum of an infinite power series of the auxiliary fields, up to now one can not carry out the standard path integral procedure. In conclusion, we have shown that the improved version [10] of the BFT formalism is more economical than the previous BFT versions [7 9] including the BF one [4] by explicitly analyzing the abelian U(1) Higgs model. We hope that this powerful BFT formalism with the hidden relation, which we first used here, will improve the transparency of the analysis in the nonabelian cases which are realistic and phenomenological models related to the spontaneously broken symmetry. APPENDIX In this appendix, we derive the first class Hamiltonian (21) in the extended phase space corresponding to the second class one (3) by using the usual BFT approach [6,7]. The first class Hamiltonian H c corresponding to H c is given by the infinite series, H c = n=0 satisfying the initial condition, H c (F; 0) = of H c is given by H (n) c = 1 n H (n) c ; H (n) c (Φ i ) n, (45) H (0) c = H c. The general solution for the involution d 3 xd 3 yd 3 z Φ i (x)ω ij (x, y)x jk (y, z)g (n 1) k (z) (n 1), (46) where the generating functions G (n) k are given by G (0) i = {Ω (0) i, H c }, G (n) i = {Ω (0) i, H c (n) } F + {Ω (1) i, H c (n 1) } F (n 1), (47) 13
14 where the subscipt F represents that the Poisson brackets are calculated among the original fields. Here, ω ij and X ij are the inverse matrices of ω ij and X ij, respectively. Explicit calculations yield G (0) 1 = Ω 2, G (0) ( 2 = i x g 2 (ρ + v) 2 A i) + 2g 2 A 0 ρπ ρ, (48) which are substituted in (46) to obtain H c (1), [ H c (1) = d 3 x g 2 (ρ + v) 2 i θa i + 2g 2 (ρ + v)θa 0 π ρ ] π θ g 2 (ρ + v) 2Ω 2. (49) This is inserted back in Eq. (47) in order to deduce G (1) i as follows G (1) 1 = π θ, G (1) 2 = g 2 (ρ + v) 2 i i θ + 2g 2 i θ(ρ + v) i ρ + 4g 4 (ρ + v) 2 θ(a 0 ) 2. (50) Then, we obtain H c (2) by substituting G (1) i in Eq. (46) [ H c (2) = d 3 x 1 2 g2 (ρ + v) 2 i θ i θ + 2g 4 (ρ + v) 2 θ 2 (A 0 ) 2 π 2 ] θ. (51) 2g 2 (ρ + v) 2 Finally, since G (n) i = 0 (n 2), (52) due to the proper choice (7), we obtain exactly the same Hamiltonian H c in (23) as follows H c = H c + H c (1) + H c (2) = d 3 x H c. (53) ACKNOWLEDGMENT We would like to thank M. I. Park and K. D. Rothe for helpful disscusions, and the Institut für Theoretische Physik for their warm hospitality. The present study was partly supported by the Korea Research Foundation for (1996) overseas fellowship (Y. W. Kim), the KOSEF DFG Exchange Program (Y. J. Park), and the Basic Science Researh Institute Program, Ministry of Education, 1997, Project No. BSRI
15 REFERENCES [1] P. A. M. Dirac, Can. J. Math. 2, 129 (1950); Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (Yeshiva University, New York 1964). [2] E. S. Abers and B. W. Lee, Phys. Rep. C9, 1 (1973). [3] H. O. Girotti and H. J. Rothe, Nuovo Cim, 75A, 62 (1983). [4] R. Banerjee, H. J. Rothe and K. D. Rothe, Nucl. Phys. B426, 129 (1994). [5] I. A. Batalin and E. S. Fradkin, Phys. Lett. B180, 157 (1986); Nucl. Phys. B279, 514 (1987). [6] I. A. Batalin and I. V. Tyutin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6, 3255 (1991). [7] R. Banerjee, Phys. Rev. D48, R5467 (1993); W. T. Kim and Y. J. Park, Phys. Lett. B336, 376 (1994); Y. W. Kim, Y. J. Park, K. Y. Kim and Y. Kim, Phys. Rev. D51, 2943 (1995); R. J. Banerjee, H. J. Rothe and K. D. Rothe, Phys. Rev. D55, 1 (1997). [8] R. Amorim and A. Das, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 3543 (1994); R. Amorim, Z. Phys. C67, 695 (1995). [9] N. Banerjee, R. Banerjee and S. Ghosh, Ann. Phys. (NY) 241, 237 (1995). [10] W. T. Kim, Y. W. Kim, M. I. Park, Y. J. Park and S. J. Yoon, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. 23, 325 (1997); Y. W. Kim, M. I. Park, Y. J. Park, and S. J. Yoon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12, 4217 (1997). [11] R. Banerjee and J. Barcelos-Neto, Nucl. Phys. B499, 453 (1997). [12] M. I. Park and Y. J. Park, Non-Abelian Proca model based on the improved BFT formalism, SOGANG HEP 212/97 (hep th/ ). [13] Y. W. Kim and K.D. Rothe, BFT Hamiltonian Embedding of non-abelian self-dual model, HD THEP (hep th/ ). [14] K. D. Rothe and H. O. Girotti, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4, 3041 (1989). [15] E. S. Fradkin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B55, 224 (1975); I. A. Batalin and G. 15
16 A. Vilkovsky, Phys. Lett. 69B, 309 (1977); E. S. Fradkin and T. E. Fradkina, Phys. Lett. 72B, 343 (1978). [16] M. Henneaux, Phys. Rep. C126, 1 (1985); M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1992). [17] L. D. Faddeev and S. L. Shatashivili, Phys. Lett. B167, (1986) 225; O. Babelon, F. A. Schaposnik and C. M. Viallet, Phys. Lett. B177, 385 (1986); K. Harada and I. Tsutsui, Phys. Lett. B183, 311 (1987). [18] L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Phys. Lett. B27, (1967) 29; L. D. Faddeev and A. Slavnov, Gauge fields: Introduction to quantum theory (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA, 1983). [19] Y. W. Kim and Y. J. Park, In preparation. 16
arxiv:hep-th/ v1 21 Jan 1997
SOGANG-HEP 209/96 December 996(revised) The Quantization of the Chiral Schwinger Model Based on the BFT BFV Formalism arxiv:hep-th/97002v 2 Jan 997 Won T. Kim, Yong-Wan Kim, Mu-In Park, and Young-Jai Park
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 1 Dec 1998
SOGANG-HEP 235/98 Lagrangian Approach of the First Class Constrained Systems Yong-Wan Kim, Seung-Kook Kim and Young-Jai Park arxiv:hep-th/9812001v1 1 Dec 1998 Department of Physics and Basic Science Research
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1998
SOGANG HEP 225/97 Generalized BFT Formalism of SU(2 U( Higgs Model Sean J. Yoon, Yong-Wan Kim and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics, Sogang University, C.P.O.Box 42, Seoul 00-6, Korea arxiv:hep-th/98038v
More informationHamiltonian Embedding of SU(2) Higgs Model in the Unitary Gauge
HD THEP 97 28 SOGANG HEP 222/97 Hamiltonian Embedding of SU(2) Higgs Model in the Unitary Gauge arxiv:hep-th/9711092v1 13 Nov 1997 Yong-Wan Kim 1, Young-Jai Park 1 and Klaus D. Rothe 2 Institut für Theoretische
More informationImproved BFT embedding having chain-structure arxiv:hep-th/ v1 3 Aug 2005
hep-th/0508022 SOGANG-HEP315/05 Improved BFT embedding having chain-structure arxiv:hep-th/0508022v1 3 Aug 2005 Yong-Wan Kim 1 and Ee Chang-Young 2 Department of Physics and Institute for Science and Technology,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Nov 1998
SOGANG-HEP 249/98 Consistent Dirac Quantization of SU(2) Skyrmion equivalent to BFT Scheme arxiv:hep-th/9811066v1 7 Nov 1998 Soon-Tae Hong 1, Yong-Wan Kim 1,2 and Young-Jai Park 1 1 Department of Physics
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Oct 1998
SOGANG-HEP 238/98 October 2, 1998 Two Different Gauge Invariant Models in Lagrangian Approach arxiv:hep-th/9810016v1 2 Oct 1998 Seung-Kook Kim, Yong-Wan Kim, and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics, Seonam
More informationImproved BFT quantization of O(3) nonlinear sigma model
SOGANG-HEP 257/99 Improved BFT quantization of O(3) nonlinear sigma model Soon-Tae Hong a,wontaekim b, and Young-Jai Park c Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 Sep 1999
Generalized BFT Formalism of Electroweak Theory in the Unitary Gauge Yong-Wan Kim, Young-Jai Park and Sean J. Yoon Department of Physics, Sogang University, C.P.O.Box 42, Seoul 00-6, Korea (January 7,
More informationBFT quantization of chiral-boson theories
BFT quantization of chiral-boson theories IF-UFRJ-20/94 arxiv:hep-th/9408038v1 5 Aug 1994 R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro RJ 21945-970 - Caixa
More informationBFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system. Abstract
SOGANG-HEP 271/00 BFT embedding of noncommutative D-brane system Soon-Tae Hong,WonTaeKim, Young-Jai Park, and Myung Seok Yoon Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University,
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 28 Nov 2000
Improved Dirac quantization of a free particle Soon-Tae Hong, Won Tae Kim and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University, C.P.O. Box 1142, Seoul 100-611,
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v2 6 Apr 1999
1 Notations I am using the same notations as in [3] and [2]. 2 Temporal gauge - various approaches arxiv:gr-qc/9801081v2 6 Apr 1999 Obviously the temporal gauge q i = a i = const or in QED: A 0 = a R (1)
More informationDuality between constraints and gauge conditions
Duality between constraints and gauge conditions arxiv:hep-th/0504220v2 28 Apr 2005 M. Stoilov Institute of Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Sofia 1784, Bulgaria E-mail: mstoilov@inrne.bas.bg 24 April
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 Jan 1999
SOGANG-HEP 249/98 Consistent Dirac Quantization of SU(2) Skyrmion equivalent to BFT Scheme arxiv:hep-th/9811066v2 11 Jan 1999 Soon-Tae Hong 1, Yong-Wan Kim 1,2 and Young-Jai Park 1 1 Department of Physics
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 17 Jun 2003
HD-THEP-03-28 Dirac s Constrained Hamiltonian Dynamics from an Unconstrained Dynamics arxiv:hep-th/030655v 7 Jun 2003 Heinz J. Rothe Institut für Theoretische Physik Universität Heidelberg, Philosophenweg
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v3 19 Jun 1998
hep-th/9702134 SOGANG-HEP 212/97 Non-Abelian Proca model based on the improved BFT formalism arxiv:hep-th/9702134v3 19 Jun 1998 Mu-In Park a and Young-Jai Park b, Department of Physics and Basic Science
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 23 Mar 2015
Equivalence between two different field-dependent BRST formulations Sudhaker Upadhyay Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 08016, India Bhabani Prasad Mandal Department
More informationDepartment of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University, C.P.O. Box 1142, Seoul , Korea. (November 26, 2001) Abstract
CP 1 model with Hopf term and fractional spin statistics Soon-Tae Hong,Bum-HoonLee, and Young-Jai Park Department of Physics and Basic Science Research Institute, Sogang University, C.P.O. Box 1142, Seoul
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 11 Sep 1996
Gauge Independence of the Lagrangian Path Integral in a Higher-Order Formalism arxiv:hep-th/9609037v2 Sep 996 I.A. Batalin I.E. Tamm Theory Division P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute Russian Academy of Sciences
More informationThe Dirac Propagator From Pseudoclassical Mechanics
CALT-68-1485 DOE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT The Dirac Propagator From Pseudoclassical Mechanics Theodore J. Allen California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 9115 Abstract In this note it is
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 1 Mar 2000
February 2000 IUT-Phys/00-02 arxiv:hep-th/0003010v1 1 Mar 2000 Classification of constraints using chain by chain method 1 F. Loran, 2 A. Shirzad, 3 Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences P.O.
More informationQuantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams
Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams III. Quantization of constrained systems and Maxwell s theory 1. The
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 13 Sep 2001
Compactification of gauge theories and the gauge invariance of massive modes. Amorim a and J. Barcelos-Neto b Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do io de Janeiro J 21945-97 - Caixa Postal 68528 -
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 14 Jan 1997
Transformation of second-class into first-class constraints in supersymmetric theories arxiv:hep-th/9701058v1 14 Jan 1997 J. Barcelos-Neto and W. Oliveira Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio
More informationSnyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics
arxiv:hep-th/0408193v1 25 Aug 2004 Snyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics Juan M. Romero and Adolfo Zamora Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Apartado
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 16 Aug 1996
Göteborg ITP 96-12 August 1996 hep-th/yymmddd arxiv:hep-th/9608110v1 16 Aug 1996 Time evolution in general gauge theories on inner product spaces Robert Marnelius 1 Institute of Theoretical Physics Chalmers
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 13 Feb 1992
Chiral Bosons Through Linear Constraints H. O. Girotti, M. Gomes and V. O. Rivelles Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 2516, 1498 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. arxiv:hep-th/92243v1 13
More informationThe Ward Identity from the Background Field Dependence of the Effective Action
HD-THEP-96-0 The Ward Identity from the Bacground Field Dependence of the Effective Action F. Freire and C. Wetterich 2 Institut für Theoretische Physi, Universität Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 6, D-6920
More informationPath Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor
EJTP 6, No. 22 (2009) 189 196 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor Walaa. I. Eshraim and Nasser. I. Farahat Department of
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationFROM SLAVNOV TAYLOR IDENTITIES TO THE ZJ EQUATION JEAN ZINN-JUSTIN
FROM SLAVNOV TAYLOR IDENTITIES TO THE ZJ EQUATION JEAN ZINN-JUSTIN CEA, IRFU (irfu.cea.fr) Centre de Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France E-mail: jean.zinn-justin@cea.fr ABSTRACT In their work devoted
More informationHiggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I
iggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I Laura Reina TASI 2011, CU-Boulder, June 2011 Outline of Lecture I Understanding the Electroweak Symmetry Breaking as a first step towards a more fundamental theory of
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 4 Sep 2009
The Gauge Unfixing Formalism and the Solutions arxiv:0904.4711v2 [hep-th] 4 Sep 2009 of the Dirac Bracket Commutators Jorge Ananias Neto Departamento de Física, ICE, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora,
More informationGeneralization of the Hamilton-Jacobi approach for higher order singular systems
1 arxiv:hep-th/9704088v1 10 Apr 1997 Generalization of the Hamilton-Jacobi approach for higher order singular systems B. M. Pimentel and R. G. Teixeira Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual
More informationJackiw-Pi Model: A Superfield Approach
Jackiw-Pi Model: A Superfield Approach Saurabh Gupta The Institute of Mathematical Sciences CIT Campus, Chennai, India July 29, 2013 Saurabh Gupta (IMSc) 3D Jackiw-Pi Model July 29, 2013 1 / 31 This talk
More informationHIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY
HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY I.L. Buchbinder Tomsk I.L. Buchbinder (Tomsk) HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY Wroclaw, April, 2011 1 / 27 Aims Brief non-expert non-technical review of some old
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 6 Mar 2000
Consistent Batalin Fradkin quantization of Infinitely Reducible First Class Constraints Stefano Bellucci and Anton Galajinsky INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, C.P. 3, 00044 Frascati, Italia arxiv:hep-th/990990v
More informationMassive Gauge Field Theory without Higgs Mechanism
Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 2004, Vol. 50, Part 2, 965 972 Massive Gauge Field heory without Higgs Mechanism Junchen SU Center for heoretical Physics, Department of Physics,
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14.
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14 Majorana spinors March 15, 2012 So far, we have only considered massless, two-component
More informationQuantization of scalar fields
Quantization of scalar fields March 8, 06 We have introduced several distinct types of fields, with actions that give their field equations. These include scalar fields, S α ϕ α ϕ m ϕ d 4 x and complex
More informationetc., etc. Consequently, the Euler Lagrange equations for the Φ and Φ fields may be written in a manifestly covariant form as L Φ = m 2 Φ, (S.
PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #3. Problem 1a: Let s start with the scalar fields Φx and Φ x. Similar to the EM covariant derivatives, the non-abelian covariant derivatives may be integrated by parts
More informationHamilton-Jacobi Formulation of A Non-Abelian Yang-Mills Theories
EJTP 5, No. 17 (2008) 65 72 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Hamilton-Jacobi Formulation of A Non-Abelian Yang-Mills Theories W. I. Eshraim and N. I. Farahat Department of Physics Islamic University
More informationSECOND-ORDER LAGRANGIAN FORMULATION OF LINEAR FIRST-ORDER FIELD EQUATIONS
SECOND-ORDER LAGRANGIAN FORMULATION OF LINEAR FIRST-ORDER FIELD EQUATIONS CONSTANTIN BIZDADEA, SOLANGE-ODILE SALIU Department of Physics, University of Craiova 13 Al. I. Cuza Str., Craiova 00585, Romania
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 10 Apr 2006
Gravitation with Two Times arxiv:hep-th/0604076v1 10 Apr 2006 W. Chagas-Filho Departamento de Fisica, Universidade Federal de Sergipe SE, Brazil February 1, 2008 Abstract We investigate the possibility
More informationA Lax Representation for the Born-Infeld Equation
A Lax Representation for the Born-Infeld Equation J. C. Brunelli Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Departamento de Física CFM Campus Universitário Trindade C.P. 476, CEP 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationPath Integral Quantization of Constrained Systems
Islamic University-Gaza Deanery of Graduate Science Faculty of Science Department of Physics Path Integral Quantization of Constrained Systems BY Tahany Riziq Dalloul Supervisor Dr. Nasser I. Farahat A
More informationTwo-loop Remainder Functions in N = 4 SYM
Two-loop Remainder Functions in N = 4 SYM Claude Duhr Institut für theoretische Physik, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Paulistr. 27, CH-8093, Switzerland E-mail: duhrc@itp.phys.ethz.ch 1 Introduction Over the last
More informationFinite-temperature Field Theory
Finite-temperature Field Theory Aleksi Vuorinen CERN Initial Conditions in Heavy Ion Collisions Goa, India, September 2008 Outline Further tools for equilibrium thermodynamics Gauge symmetry Faddeev-Popov
More informationEmergence of Yang Mills theory from the Non-Abelian Nambu Model
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PPER OPEN CCESS Emergence of Yang Mills theory from the Non-belian Nambu Model To cite this article: C.. Escobar and L. F. Urrutia 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 761 012058
More informationSupergravity in Quantum Mechanics
Supergravity in Quantum Mechanics hep-th/0408179 Peter van Nieuwenhuizen C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics Stony Brook University Erice Lectures, June 2017 Vienna Lectures, Jan/Feb 2017 Aim of
More informationGroup Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories
Group Structure of SpontaneouslyBroken Gauge Theories p. 1/25 Group Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories Laura Daniel ldaniel@ucsc.edu Physics Department University of California, Santa Cruz
More informationInteracting Theory of Chiral Bosons and Gauge Fields on Noncommutative Extended Minkowski Spacetime
Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (0 855 865 Vol. 57, No. 5, May 5, 0 Interacting Theory of Chiral Bosons and Gauge Fields on Noncommutative Extended Minkowski Spacetime MIAO Yan-Gang (,,3, and ZHAO Ying-Jie (,
More informationLecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems
Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems (Courses in canonical gravity) Yaser Tavakoli December 15, 2014 1 Introduction In canonical formulation of general relativity, geometry of space-time is given
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables Some formulas can be found on p.2. 1. Concepts.
More informationQUANTUM EINSTEIN S EQUATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ALGEBRA
QUANTUM EINSTEIN S EQUATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ALGEBRA FATIMAH SHOJAI Physics Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 16765 163, Narmak, Tehran, IRAN and Institute for Studies in Theoretical
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1995
Straight-line string with curvature L.D.Soloviev Institute for High Energy Physics, 142284, Protvino, Moscow region, Russia arxiv:hep-th/9503156v1 23 Mar 1995 Abstract Classical and quantum solutions for
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 16 Jun 1993
(Constrained) Quantization Without Tears R. Jackiw Center for Theoretical Physics arxiv:hep-th/9306075v1 16 Jun 1993 Laboratory for Nuclear Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 13 Aug 2003
ULB PMIF 92/04 arxiv:hep-th/9209007v2 3 Aug 2003 BRST-anti-BRST Antifield Formalism : The Example of the Freedman-Townsend Model G. Barnich, R. Constantinescu, and P. Grgoire Faculté des Sciences, Université
More informationFinite Temperature Field Theory
Finite Temperature Field Theory Dietrich Bödeker, Universität Bielefeld 1. Thermodynamics (better: thermo-statics) (a) Imaginary time formalism (b) free energy: scalar particles, resummation i. pedestrian
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v3 27 Mar 2007
FIUN-GCP-07/3 W-gauge boson condensation via background currents arxiv:hep-ph/07036v3 7 Mar 007 C. A. Peña and C. J. Quimbay Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Ciudad Universitaria,
More informationVector Fields. It is standard to define F µν = µ ϕ ν ν ϕ µ, so that the action may be written compactly as
Vector Fields The most general Poincaré-invariant local quadratic action for a vector field with no more than first derivatives on the fields (ensuring that classical evolution is determined based on the
More informationTopological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons
8 November 00 Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 www.elsevier.com/locate/npe Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons A. Imaanpur Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University,
More informationRemarks on Gauge Fixing and BRST Quantization of Noncommutative Gauge Theories
Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 35, no. 3A, September, 25 645 Remarks on Gauge Fixing and BRST Quantization of Noncommutative Gauge Theories Ricardo Amorim, Henrique Boschi-Filho, and Nelson R. F. Braga
More informationMSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00
MSci EXAMINATION PHY-415 (MSci 4242 Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields Time Allowed: 2 hours 30 minutes Date: XX th May, 2010 Time: 14:30-17:00 Instructions: Answer THREE QUESTIONS only. Each question
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 30 Sep 2003
KL-TH / 03-03 arxiv:hep-th/0309268v1 30 Sep 2003 A Map between (q, h)-deformed Gauge Theories and ordinary Gauge Theories L. Mesref Department of Physics, Theoretical Physics University of Kaiserslautern,
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16 Masses for Vectors: the Higgs mechanism April 6, 2012 The momentum-space propagator
More informationON ABELIANIZATION OF FIRST CLASS CONSTRAINTS
ON ABELIANIZATION OF FIRST CLASS CONSTRAINTS arxiv:hep-th/9504153v1 28 Apr 1995 S A Gogilidze, A M Khvedelidze, V N Pervushin Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,
More informationHelicity conservation in Born-Infeld theory
Helicity conservation in Born-Infeld theory A.A.Rosly and K.G.Selivanov ITEP, Moscow, 117218, B.Cheryomushkinskaya 25 Abstract We prove that the helicity is preserved in the scattering of photons in the
More informationA Remark on BRST Singlets
A Remark on BRST Singlets E. Kazes arxiv:hep-th/00050v May 000 Department of Physics 04 Davey Laboratory University Park, PA 680 October, 07 Abstract Negative norm Hilbert space state vectors can be BRST
More informationAnalysis of inter-quark interactions in classical chromodynamics
Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 3 3 336-344 DOI:.478/s534-3-7-y Central European Journal of Physics Analysis of inter-quark interactions in classical chromodynamics Research Article Jurij W. Darewych, Askold Duviryak
More informationwhere P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation
1 Content of the course Quantum Field Theory by M. Srednicki, Part 1. Combining QM and relativity We are going to keep all axioms of QM: 1. states are vectors (or rather rays) in Hilbert space.. observables
More informationNon Abelian Higgs Mechanism
Non Abelian Higgs Mechanism When a local rather than global symmetry is spontaneously broken, we do not get a massless Goldstone boson. Instead, the gauge field of the broken symmetry becomes massive,
More informationQuantum Field Theory III
Quantum Field Theory III Prof. Erick Weinberg January 19, 2011 1 Lecture 1 1.1 Structure We will start with a bit of group theory, and we will talk about spontaneous symmetry broken. Then we will talk
More informationTopologically Massive Yang-Mills field on the Null-Plane: A Hamilton-Jacobi approach
Topologically Massive Yang-Mills field on the Null-Plane: A Hamilton-Jacobi approach M. C. Bertin, B. M. Pimentel, C. E. Valcárcel and G. E. R. Zambrano Instituto de Física Teórica, UNESP - São Paulo State
More informationTHE STANDARD MODEL AND THE GENERALIZED COVARIANT DERIVATIVE
THE STANDAD MODEL AND THE GENEALIZED COVAIANT DEIVATIVE arxiv:hep-ph/9907480v Jul 999 M. Chaves and H. Morales Escuela de Física, Universidad de Costa ica San José, Costa ica E-mails: mchaves@cariari.ucr.ac.cr,
More informationQFT at finite Temperature
Benjamin Eltzner Seminar on Theoretical Elementary Particle Physics and QFT, 13.07.06 Content 1 Path Integral and Partition Function Classical Partition Function The Quantum Mechanical Partition Function
More informationHamilton-Jacobi Formulation of Supermembrane
EJTP 1, No. 33 (015) 149 154 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Hamilton-Jacobi Formulation of Supermembrane M. Kh. Srour 1,M.Alwer and N. I.Farahat 1 Physics Department, Al Aqsa University, P.O.
More informationChiral symmetry breaking - Effective lagrangian. Abstract In this lectures, I will introduce an effective Lagrangian with determinant interaction [1]
Chiral symmetry breaking - Effective lagrangian Su Houng Lee 1, 1 IPAP and Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul 10-749 Korea (Dated: October 1, 010) Abstract In this lectures, I will introduce
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 15 Jul 1999
Extended supersymmetry in D=1+1 arxiv:hep-th/9905145v2 15 Jul 1999 R. Amorim and J. Barcelos-Neto Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro RJ 21945-970 - Caixa Postal 68528 - Brasil Abstract
More informationExercise 1 Classical Bosonic String
Exercise 1 Classical Bosonic String 1. The Relativistic Particle The action describing a free relativistic point particle of mass m moving in a D- dimensional Minkowski spacetime is described by ) 1 S
More informationChern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee
Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee Maxwell Theory Maxwell Theory: Gauge Transformation and Invariance Gauss Law Charge Degrees of
More informationConstrained Dynamical Systems and Their Quantization
Constrained Dynamical Systems and Their Quantization Graduate lecture by Y. Kazama University of Tokyo, Komaba constsys-1 Contents 1. Constraints and flows in the phase space 2. Systems with multiple constraints
More information1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge
Contents 1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge 1.1 Free field space of states............................... 1. Constraints..................................... 3 1..1 VIRASORO ALGEBRA...........................
More informationGauge Invariant Variables for SU(2) Yang-Mills Theory
Gauge Invariant Variables for SU(2) Yang-Mills Theory Cécile Martin Division de Physique Théorique, Institut de Physique Nucléaire F-91406, Orsay Cedex, France. Abstract We describe a nonperturbative calculation
More informationLectures April 29, May
Lectures 25-26 April 29, May 4 2010 Electromagnetism controls most of physics from the atomic to the planetary scale, we have spent nearly a year exploring the concrete consequences of Maxwell s equations
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables 1. Procca equation. 5 points A massive spin-1
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Aug 2000
hep-th/0008120 IPM/P2000/026 Gauged Noncommutative Wess-Zumino-Witten Models arxiv:hep-th/0008120v1 15 Aug 2000 Amir Masoud Ghezelbash,,1, Shahrokh Parvizi,2 Department of Physics, Az-zahra University,
More informationRepresentations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials
Representations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials Govindan Rangarajan a) Department of Mathematics and Centre for Theoretical Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012,
More informationSuperfield Approach to Abelian 3-form gauge theory. QFT 2011 (23 27 Feb. 2011) [IISER, Pune]
Superfield Approach to Abelian 3-form gauge theory QFT 2011 (23 27 Feb. 2011) [IISER, Pune] References 1. R. P. Malik, Eur. Phys. J. C 60 (2009) 2. L. Bonora, R. P. Malik, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010)
More informationGRANGIAN QUANTIZATION OF THE HETEROTIC STRING IN THE BOSONIC FORMULAT
September, 1987 IASSNS-HEP-87/draft GRANGIAN QUANTIZATION OF THE HETEROTIC STRING IN THE BOSONIC FORMULAT J. M. F. LABASTIDA and M. PERNICI The Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540, USA ABSTRACT
More informationSuperintegrable 3D systems in a magnetic field and Cartesian separation of variables
Superintegrable 3D systems in a magnetic field and Cartesian separation of variables in collaboration with L. Šnobl Czech Technical University in Prague GSD 2017, June 5-10, S. Marinella (Roma), Italy
More informationYANG-MILLS THEORY. This theory will be invariant under the following U(1) phase transformations
YANG-MILLS THEORY TOMAS HÄLLGREN Abstract. We give a short introduction to classical Yang-Mills theory. Starting from Abelian symmetries we motivate the transformation laws, the covariant derivative and
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 29 Dec 2011
Remarks on Note about Hamiltonian formalism of healthy extended Hořava-Lifshitz gravity by J. Klusoň N. Kiriushcheva, P. G. Komorowski, and S. V. Kuzmin The Department of Applied Mathematics, The University
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v3 21 Jul 1997
CERN-TH/96-366 hep-th/9612191 Classical Duality from Dimensional Reduction of Self Dual 4-form Maxwell Theory in 10 dimensions arxiv:hep-th/9612191v3 21 Jul 1997 David Berman Theory Division, CERN, CH
More information3 Quantization of the Dirac equation
3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary
More informationWiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, A-1040 Wien, Austria. Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Wien, Austria
hep-th/0102103 REF. TUW 01-03 REF. UWThPh-2001-9 Deformed QED via Seiberg-Witten Map arxiv:hep-th/0102103v1 16 Feb 2001 A. A. Bichl 1, J. M. Grimstrup 2, L. Popp 3, M. Schweda 4, R. Wulkenhaar 5 1,2,3,4
More informationFinite temperature QFT: A dual path integral representation
A dual path integral representation I. Roditi Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas February 20, 2009 1 I. Roditi (CBPF) Collaborators: 2 I. Roditi (CBPF) Collaborators: C. Cappa Ttira 2 I. Roditi (CBPF)
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 8 Jun 2000
Partially emedding of the quantum mechanical analog of the nonlinear sigma model R. Amorim a, J. Barcelos-Neto and C. Wotzasek c Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro RJ 1945-970 -
More information