INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH NUMERICAL EXAMPLES

Similar documents
INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH NUMERICAL EXAMPLES

Control Systems. Frequency Method Nyquist Analysis.

The Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the open-loop frequency response and open loop pole location.

Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 18 Stability of Feedback Systems

r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

MAE 143B - Homework 9

Engineering Tripos Part IIB Nonlinear Systems and Control. Handout 4: Circle and Popov Criteria

Chapter Stability Robustness Introduction Last chapter showed how the Nyquist stability criterion provides conditions for the stability robustness of

The Nyquist Feedback Stability Criterion

Systems Analysis and Control

QUANTITATIVE L P STABILITY ANALYSIS OF A CLASS OF LINEAR TIME-VARYING FEEDBACK SYSTEMS

Module 7 : Applications of Integration - I. Lecture 21 : Relative rate of growth of functions [Section 21.1] Objectives

ECE 486 Control Systems

6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 0: Nyquist Stability Prof. Joel L. Dawson

Systems Analysis and Control

6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control

Control Systems. University Questions

L2 gains and system approximation quality 1

IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION

Robust Control of Heterogeneous Networks (e.g. congestion control for the Internet)

Table of Laplacetransform

K(s +2) s +20 K (s + 10)(s +1) 2. (c) KG(s) = K(s + 10)(s +1) (s + 100)(s +5) 3. Solution : (a) KG(s) = s +20 = K s s

Frequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability

Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear systems (frequency domain)

Nyquist Plots / Nyquist Stability Criterion

FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control

Nyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System

Stability Analysis of Nonlinear System by Popov s Stability Criterion. By: Nafees Ahmed

MAE 143B - Homework 9

Lecture 15 Nyquist Criterion and Diagram

Linear Control Systems Lecture #3 - Frequency Domain Analysis. Guillaume Drion Academic year

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

H(s) = s. a 2. H eq (z) = z z. G(s) a 2. G(s) A B. s 2 s(s + a) 2 s(s a) G(s) 1 a 1 a. } = (z s 1)( z. e ) ) (z. (z 1)(z e at )(z e at )

(Continued on next page)

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Digital Control Systems State Feedback Control

D G 2 H + + D 2

Course Outline. Closed Loop Stability. Stability. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. Nyquist Stability. Dr. Dunant Halim

1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

Lecture 5 Input output stability

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.

FREQUENCY RESPONSE ANALYSIS Closed Loop Frequency Response

Test 2 SOLUTIONS. ENGI 5821: Control Systems I. March 15, 2010

Lecture Sketching the root locus

UNIT-II Z-TRANSFORM. This expression is also called a one sided z-transform. This non causal sequence produces positive powers of z in X (z).

Digital Control Systems

Frequency Response Techniques

Design Methods for Control Systems

4 The Trigonometric Functions

Exam in Systems Engineering/Process Control

2006 Fall. G(s) y = Cx + Du

Control Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition

Contents. 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5. 2 Linearization Causality, Time Invariance, and Linearity 31

Classify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.

Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity

DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1

Systems Analysis and Control

STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS

3 Stabilization of MIMO Feedback Systems

ECE 350 Signals and Systems Spring 2011 Final Exam - Solutions. Three 8 ½ x 11 sheets of notes, and a calculator are allowed during the exam.

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems

Control Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich

Collocated versus non-collocated control [H04Q7]

Control Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Guzzella 9.1-3, Emilio Frazzoli

CHAPTER 5 : REDUCTION OF MULTIPLE SUBSYSTEMS

1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I

Introduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31

ECEN 326 Electronic Circuits

Definition of Stability

Chapter 9 Robust Stability in SISO Systems 9. Introduction There are many reasons to use feedback control. As we have seen earlier, with the help of a

R a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.

R10 JNTUWORLD B 1 M 1 K 2 M 2. f(t) Figure 1

Solution 7 August 2015 ECE301 Signals and Systems: Final Exam. Cover Sheet

Inverted Pendulum. Objectives

Section 1.4 Circles. Objective #1: Writing the Equation of a Circle in Standard Form.

Topic # Feedback Control

Control of Mobile Robots

Digital Control Engineering Analysis and Design

This homework will not be collected or graded. It is intended to help you practice for the final exam. Solutions will be posted.

Frequency response. Pavel Máša - XE31EO2. XE31EO2 Lecture11. Pavel Máša - XE31EO2 - Frequency response

x(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!

Fourier transforms, Generalised functions and Greens functions

Summary and discussion of The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

Exercises Automatic Control III 2015

The stability of linear time-invariant feedback systems

Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

Determine the Z transform (including the region of convergence) for each of the following signals:

Frequency domain analysis

Class 13 Frequency domain analysis

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

CONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING Sixth Edition International Student Version

8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance

Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 6 Passivity and Input-Output Stability

Applied Nonlinear Control

Transcription:

INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH NUMERICAL EXAMPLES

EXERCISE Let us consider the linear dynamical system of order 2 with transfer function with Determine the gain 2 (H) of the input-output operator H associated with this system.

WEAKLY BOUNDED OPERATOR u H y causal Definition (weakly bounded operator): A causal operator is weakly bounded (or with finite gain) if Definition (gain of a weakly bounded operator): Let be a causal weakly bounded operator. The gain of H is given by

EXAMPLE: LINEAR ASYMPTOTICALLY STABLE DYNAMICAL SYSTEM Let In conclusion: H is bounded and weakly bounded with gain norm of F(s)

Let us consider the linear dynamical system of order 2 with transfer function with Determine the gain 2 (H) of the input-output operator H associated with this system. The systems is asymptotically stable. We then need to determine the norm of F(s).

Let us consider the linear dynamical system of order 2 with transfer function with Determine the gain 2 (H) of the input-output operator H associated with this system. The systems is asymptotically stable. We then need to determine the norm of F(s). F(s) is a transfer function with gain F(0)=1 and either real or complex coniugate poles. In the latter case,we have a resonance pick if

Let us consider the linear dynamical system of order 2 with transfer function with Determine the gain 2 (H) of the input-output operator H associated with this system. The systems is asymptotically stable. We then need to determine the norm of F(s). F(s) is a transfer function with gain F(0)=1 and either real or complex coniugate poles. In the latter case,we have a resonance pick if Hence, we can conclude that:

Let us consider the linear dynamical system of order 2 with transfer function with Determine the gain 2 (H) of the input-output operator H associated with this system. The systems is asymptotically stable. We then need to determine the norm of F(s). F(s) is a transfer function with gain F(0)=1 and either real or complex coniugate poles. In the latter case,we have a resonance pick if Hence, we can conclude that:

u EXERCISE F(s) y (n=2) By using the small gain theorem, determine the values of k>0 such that the operator H with input u and output y is: 1) L -stable 2) L 2 -stable with finite gain. Provide also an estimate for the gain.

STABILITY OF INTERCONNECTED SYSTEMS: FEEDBACK H u 1 z 1 y H 1 1 y 2 H 2 z 2 u 2 Small gain theorem Let H be a well-posed causal operator obtained by connecting in feedback two causal and weakly bounded operators H 1 and H 2. If then, H is weakly bounded. Furthermore, Remark: it holds irrespectively of the signs at the summation nodes.

STABILITY OF INTERCONNECTED SYSTEMS: FEEDBACK H u 1 z 1 y H 1 1 y 2 H 2 z 2 u 2 Small gain theorem Let H be a well-posed causal operator obtained by connecting in feedback two causal and weakly bounded operators H 1 and H 2. If then, H is weakly bounded. Furthermore, Remark: it holds irrespectively of the signs at the summation nodes.

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 We next show that the two operators are weakly bounded and estimate their gain.

v w w k v j(v) v

v w It is an unbiased operator because:

v w It is an unbiased operator because: Let Zero bias gain: (bounded operator weakly bounded operator)

v w It is an unbiased operator because: Let Zero bias gain: if then

v w Gain of the operator: Is the gain equal to the zero bias gain? Not in general if, then Hence,

u F(s) y (order n=2) asymptotically stable linear system

ASYMPTOTICALLY STABLE LINEAR SYSTEM Let H is bounded since (zero bias gain) H is weakly bounded Given that the operator is affine, then:

u F(s) y (n=2) asymptotically stable linear system Let

u F(s) y (n=2) asymptotically stable linear system Let since

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 We next show that the two operators are weakly bounded and estimate their gain. Let

STABILITY OF INTERCONNECTED SYSTEMS: FEEDBACK H u 1 z 1 y H 1 1 y 2 H 2 z 2 u 2 Small gain theorem Let H be a well-posed causal operator obtained by connecting in feedback two causal and weakly bounded operators H 1 and H 2. If then, H is weakly bounded. Furthermore, Remark: it holds irrespectively of the signs at the summation nodes.

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 Let us estimate for which value of k the condition required by the small gain theorem is satisfied. Let

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 Let us estimate for which value of k the condition required by the small gain theorem is satisfied. Let For k< ½, the operator H is weakly bounded and, hence, L -stable with finite gain

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 Let us estimate the gain of the operator H via the small gain theorem. Let

u EXERCISE F(s) y (n=2) By using the small gain theorem, determine the values of k>0 such that the operator H with input u and output y is: 1) L -stable 2) L 2 -stable with finite gain. Provide also an estimate for the gain.

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 We next show that the two operators are weakly bounded and estimate their gain. Let

v w w k v j(v) v

v w It is an unbiased operator because: Let Zero bias gain: (bounded operator weakly bounded operator)

v w It is an unbiased operator because: Let Zero bias gain: If then and hence

u F(s) y (n=2) asymptotically stable linear system

ASYMPTOTICALLY STABLE LINEAR SYSTEM Let H is bounded because (zero bias gain) H is weakly bounded Given that the operator is affine, then:

u F(s) y (n=2) asymptotically stable linear system Let perchè

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 We next show that the two operators are weakly bounded and estimate their gain. Let

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 Let us estimate for which value of k the condition required by the small gain theorem is satisfied. Let For k< ½, the operator H is weakly bounded and hence L 2 -stable with finite gain

u H 1 F(s) y H 2 Let us estimate the gain of the operator H via the small gain theorem. H Let

u EXERCISE F(s) y (n=2) By the circle criterion, determine the values of k>0 such that the operator H with input u and output y is L 2 -stable.

L 2 STABILITY IN SECTOR [k 1,k 2 ] S : y w e u y G(s) Theorem (Circle criterion for L 2 stability of a Lur e system) System S is L 2 -stable for any if the number of encirclements of G(s) Nyquist plot around O(k 1,k 2 ) is equal to the number of poles of G(s) with positive real part. Im Im Im Re -1 k 2-1 k 1 Re -1 k 1-1 k 2 Re 0 k 1 < k 2 k 1 < 0 < k 2 k 1 < k 2 0

L 2 STABILITY IN SECTOR [k 1,k 2 ] S : y w G(s) y Theorem (Circle criterion for L 2 stability of a Lur e system) System S is L 2 -stable for any if the number of encirclements of G(s) Nyquist plot around O(k 1,k 2 ) is equal to the number of poles of G(s) with positive real part. In our setting: e S : u F(s) y

L 2 STABILITY IN SECTOR [k 1,k 2 ] Im O(0,k) 0 k 1 < k 2 Re S : u F(s) y

Im O(0,k) Re

EXERCISE u F(s) y k y j(y) y (n=2) Value of k>0 such that the operatore H with input u and output y is L 2 -stable: small gain theorem k<1/2 circle criterion k<4

EXERCISE u F(s) y k y j(y) y (n=2) Value of k>0 such that the operatore H with input u and output y is L 2 -stable: small gain theorem k<1/2 circle criterion k<4 conservative result obtained by the small gain theorem. But the circle criterion derives from the small gain theorem

LUR E SYSTEM: SMALL GAIN THEOREM u 1 y 1 z 1 F(s) H S: H 1 H 2 y 2 z 2 u 2 System S (operator H): is L 2 -stable [for any function ] in sector [-k, k] if system with F(s) as transfer function is asymptotically stable and In this case, same condition but with in sector [0,k]

EXERCISE The figure below reports Nyquist plot of the transfer function G(s) of a linear system of order 3:

u EXERCISE G(s) y Determine k 1 and k 2 such that the Lur e system is L 2 -stable in the sector [k 1,k 2 ] by using the circle criterion

u G(s) y Determine k 1 and k 2 such that the Lur e system is L 2 -stable in the sector [k 1,k 2 ] by using the circle criterion Sol: G(s) has a real positive pole Nyquist plot of G(s) should encircle once the circle O(k 1,k 2 ) anticlockwise.

If we draw the circle centered in -3 and with radius 0.7, then, the circle criterion is satisfies. We then get -1/k 1 =-3-0.7 k 1 = 0.27-1/k 2 =-3+0.7 k 2 = 0.43

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. 1. Define the L 2 stability notion for the operator H with input y and output y.

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. 1. Define the L 2 stability notion for the operator H with input y and output y. A causal operator is - stable if In our setup the Lebesgue space of interest is L 2

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. 2. State the small gain theorem and the circle criterion for the L 2 stability of the operator H with input y and output y.

H u 1 z 1 y H 1 1 y 2 H 2 z 2 u 2 Small gain theorem Let H be a well-posed causal operator obtained by connecting in feedback two causal and weakly bounded operators H 1 and H 2. If then, H is weakly bounded, that is: Furthermore,

u 1 y 1 z 1 H S: H 1 H 2 y 2 G(s) z 2 u 2 Small gain theorem System S (operator H) is L 2 -stable (for any sector nonlinearity in [-k, k]) if

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. 2. State the small gain theorem and the circle criterion for the L 2 stability of the operator H with input y and output y.

S : y w F(s) z Theorem (Circle criterion for L 2 stability of a Lur e system) System S is L 2 -stable for any if the number of encirclements of F(s) Nyquist plot around O(k 1,k 2 ) is equal to the number of poles of F(s) with positive real part. Im Im Im Re -1 k 2-1 k 1 Re -1 k 1-1 k 2 Re 0 k 1 < k 2 k 1 < 0 < k 2 k 1 < k 2 0

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. 2. State the small gain theorem and the circle criterion for the L 2 stability of the operator H with input y and output y.

S : y w F(s) z Theorem (Circle criterion for L 2 stability of a Lur e system) System S is L 2 -stable for any if the number of encirclements of F(s)=-G(s) Nyquist plot around O(k 1,k 2 ) is equal to the number of poles of G(s) with positive real part. Im Im Im Re -1 k 2-1 k 1 Re -1 k 1-1 k 2 Re 0 k 1 < k 2 k 1 < 0 < k 2 k 1 < k 2 0

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. 3. Determine the maximum value for k>0 such that the operator H with input y and output y is L 2 stable via (a) the small gain theorem and (b) the circle criterion for the L 2 stability of H, specifying in a clear a precise way the adopted procedure and motivating the obtained result.

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. Solution (small gain theorem): Embed the sector nonlinearity in he symmetric sector [-2k, 2k] and impose that 2k G max < 1. Since G max = 2, then k < 1/4.

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. Solution (circle criterion): Find the largest k such that the Nyquist plot of G(s) is within O(-2k,k) k<1/2 Im 1/ k 1 / 2k Re

EX. 2 OF THE EXAM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 Let us consider the nonlinear system in the following figure where is a sector nonlinearity in [-2k, k], with k>0, and G s = 2 (1 0.01s) is the transfer function of a linear system of 1+s 2 1+0.001s order n=3. 4. How the reply to 3. would change if the operator with input y and output u were considered? No change.