Normal-conducting RF Photo Injectors for Free Electron Lasers

Similar documents
Diagnostic Systems for Characterizing Electron Sources at the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

Photo Injector Test facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

Motivation of emission studies at PITZ

Experimental Optimization of Electron Beams for Generating THz CTR and CDR with PITZ

Introduction to the benchmark problem

Photo Injector Test facility at DESY, Zeuthen site. PITZ: facility overview

Generation and characterization of ultra-short electron and x-ray x pulses

Simulations of the IR/THz Options at PITZ (High-gain FEL and CTR)

PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL

Investigations on the electron bunch distribution in the longitudinal phase space at a laser driven RF-electron source for the European X-FEL

Simulations of the IR/THz source at PITZ (SASE FEL and CTR)

LOLA: Past, present and future operation

Accelerator Activities at PITZ

X-ray Free-electron Lasers

ASTRA simulations of the slice longitudinal momentum spread along the beamline for PITZ

SwissFEL INJECTOR DESIGN: AN AUTOMATIC PROCEDURE

Femto-second FEL Generation with Very Low Charge at LCLS

FLASH/DESY, Hamburg. Jörg Rossbach University of Hamburg & DESY, Germany - For the FLASH Team -

START-TO-END SIMULATIONS FOR IR/THZ UNDULATOR RADIATION AT PITZ

X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012

LCLS Injector Prototyping at the GTF

Commissioning of the new Injector Laser System for the Short Pulse Project at FLASH

The New Superconducting RF Photoinjector a High-Average Current & High-Brightness Gun

CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF A SELF-SEEDING SCHEME AT FLASH2

Dark current at the Euro-XFEL

Start-to-End Simulations

Linac optimisation for the New Light Source

SRF GUN CHARACTERIZATION - PHASE SPACE AND DARK CURRENT MEASUREMENTS AT ELBE*

Excitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs

Excitements and Challenges for Future Light Sources Based on X-Ray FELs

1. Beam based alignment Laser alignment Solenoid alignment 2. Dark current 3. Thermal emittance

Short Pulse, Low charge Operation of the LCLS. Josef Frisch for the LCLS Commissioning Team

Low slice emittance preservation during bunch compression

Time resolved transverse and longitudinal phase space measurements at the high brightness photo injector PITZ

What have we learned from the LCLS injector?*

Simulation of transverse emittance measurements using the single slit method

LCLS Commissioning Status

Diagnostic Systems for High Brightness Electron Injectors

THE LCLS-II INJECTOR DESIGN*

Linac Driven Free Electron Lasers (III)

Studies with Ultra-Short Pulses

4 FEL Physics. Technical Synopsis

Introduction. Thermoionic gun vs RF photo gun Magnetic compression vs Velocity bunching. Probe beam design options

Modeling of the secondary electron emission in rf photocathode guns

Transverse emittance measurements on an S-band photocathode rf electron gun * Abstract

Dark Current at Injector. Jang-Hui Han 27 November 2006 XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

FACET-II Design Update

Developing an Eletron source for the XFEL -

Linac Based Photon Sources: XFELS. Coherence Properties. J. B. Hastings. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Injector Experimental Progress

Emission-related Activities at PITZ Proposals for the DFG-Networking "Hi 2 PE"

VELA/CLARA as Advanced Accelerator Studies Test-bed at Daresbury Lab.

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

X-band Photoinjector Beam Dynamics

Towards a Low Emittance X-ray FEL at PSI

Expected properties of the radiation from VUV-FEL / femtosecond mode of operation / E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov

Phase space measurements with tomographic reconstruction at PITZ.

ICFA ERL Workshop Jefferson Laboratory March 19-23, 2005 Working Group 1 summary Ilan Ben-Zvi & Ivan Bazarov

The VELA and CLARA Test Facilities at Daresbury Laboratory Peter McIntosh, STFC on behalf of the VELA and CLARA Development Teams

Tomographic transverse phase space measurements at PITZ.

High average current photo injector (PHIN) for the CLIC Test Facility at CERN

Microbunching Workshop 2010 March 24, 2010, Frascati, Italy. Zhirong Huang

X-band Experience at FEL

ACCELERATOR LAYOUT AND PHYSICS OF X-RAY FREE-ELECTRON LASERS

SCSS Prototype Accelerator -- Its outline and achieved beam performance --

SPPS: The SLAC Linac Bunch Compressor and Its Relevance to LCLS

Beam Echo Effect for Generation of Short Wavelength Radiation

LCLS-II SCRF start-to-end simulations and global optimization as of September Abstract

Development of Cs 2 Te photocathode RF gun system for compact THz SASE-FEL

New Electron Source for Energy Recovery Linacs

Juliane Rönsch Hamburg University. Investigations of the longitudinal phase space at a photo injector for the X-FEL

4GLS Status. Susan L Smith ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory

Photo Injector Test facility at DESY, Zeuthen site.

Harmonic Lasing Self-Seeded FEL

WG2 on ERL light sources CHESS & LEPP

SPARCLAB. Source For Plasma Accelerators and Radiation Compton. On behalf of SPARCLAB collaboration

Photoinjector design for the LCLS

Overview of FEL injectors

Experimental Measurements of the ORION Photoinjector Drive Laser Oscillator Subsystem

Brightness and Coherence of Synchrotron Radiation and Free Electron Lasers. Zhirong Huang SLAC, Stanford University May 13, 2013

A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac

Multi-quadrupole scan for emittance determination at PITZ

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

Echo-Enabled Harmonic Generation

Simulations for photoinjectors C.Limborg

Progress towards slice emittance measurements at PITZ. Raffael Niemczyk for the PITZ team, Würzburg, March 20 th 2018

OPTIMIZATION OF COMPENSATION CHICANES IN THE LCLS-II BEAM DELIVERY SYSTEM

Pushing the limits of laser synchrotron light sources

Beam dynamics studies for PITZ using a 3D full-wave Lienard-Wiechert PP code

An Adventure in Marrying Laser Arts and Accelerator Technologies

Femtosecond and sub-femtosecond x-ray pulses from a SASE-based free-electron laser. Abstract

LCLS-II Conceptual Design Review. 6 Accelerator

Observation of Coherent Optical Transition Radiation in the LCLS Linac

LCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations

Potential use of erhic s ERL for FELs and light sources ERL: Main-stream GeV e - Up-gradable to 20 + GeV e -

First operation of a Harmonic Lasing Self-Seeded FEL

Greenfield FELs. John Galayda, SLAC Kwang-Je Kim, ANL (Presenter) James Murphy, BNL

Beam Dynamics. Gennady Stupakov. DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004

Ellipsoidal Laser Status & Results Introduction Laser system & on-table data Results Redesign Outlook

Projected and slice emittance measurements using multi-quadrupole scan and streak readout at PITZ

Transcription:

Normal-conducting RF Photo Injectors for Free Electron Lasers Frank Stephan (DESY, Zeuthen site) for the PITZ team Content: Introduction: FELs and their electron sources Different NC photo injectors at SLAC for LCLS (low average current) at Berkeley for NGLS (high average current) at PITZ for FLASH and European XFEL (medium average current) Outlook and Summary

European XFEL - a next generation light source The XFEL will deliver: > wavelength down to 0.1 nm atomic-scale resolution > ultra-short pulses ( 100 fs) ultra-fast dynamics, molecular movies > ultra-high peak brilliance investigations of matter under 21+ extreme conditions ( Xe ) > transverse spatial coherence imaging of single nanoscale objects, possibly down to individual macromolecules (no crystallisation needed!!) Why brilliance is ~10E+8 higher? Synchrotrons: P ~ N e² FELs (coherence): P ~ (N e)² = N² e², N ~ 10E+8 XFEL 8 10 Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 2

SASE FEL: How does it work? Coherent motion is all we need!! Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 3

radiation power on logarithmic scale SASE FEL: How does it work? undulator electron absorber laser beam SASE = self amplified spontaneous emission undulator period λ U λ photon λ = u K 1 2 + 2γ 2 2 upper magne tic poles of the undulator electron trajectory perpendicular to magnetic field N S N S bunch of electrons with increasing density modulation elektromagnetic wave lower magnetic poles of the undulator S λ em N S N direction of motion direction of motion λmin[nm] 4π 10 Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 4 ε [mm mrad] I n p [ka] L u [m]

One XFEL key component: the high brightness electron source Why electron injector is so important.??? Any linac based short wavelength, high brilliance light source (e.g. SASE-FELs) contains the following main components: - electron source - accelerating sections - in between: bunch compressor(s) - undulator to produce FEL radiation - electron beam dump - photon beamline(s) for the users e.g. wakefields, coupler kicks e.g. coherent synchrotron radiation (CSR) increase normalized emittance Example: FLASH RF stations Diagnostics Accelerating Structures sflash Soft X-ray Undulators Beam Dump RF Gun Laser 3 rd harmonics Bunch Compressors 5 MeV 150 MeV 450 MeV 1250 MeV 315 m LOLA Photon Diagnostics property of linacs: beam quality will DEGRADE during acceleration in linac electron source has to produce lowest possible emittance!! Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 5 FEL Experiments

What is Emittance? long.: ε z ~ (e - bunchlength) (energyspreadofe - bunch) trans.: ε x,y ~ (e - beam size) (e - beam angular divergence) 2 σ x 2 σ x' ε = 6 dimensional phase space volume occupied by given number of particles effect of acceleration on transverse emittance (adiabatic damping): βγ 2 σ x' 30 20 10 0-10 transverse phase space p x ~ cov( x, x' ) θ 2 < θ 1 angular divergence is reduced -30-2 -1 0 1 2 normalized RMS transverse emittance: n 2 2 2 v 1 ε x = ß γ σ x σ x' cov (x, x ) ; ß =, γ = c 2 1- ß, x = (ε n is conserved in general) β γ 2 σ x' Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 6-20 2 σ x dx ds x

Why electron injector is so important Why emittance must be small output peak power of FLASH @ 6.4 nm (GW) peak power Q = 1 nc FLASH length of the undulator εn = 1 mm mrad εn = 2 mm mrad εn = 4 mm mrad output peak power of the XFEL SASE2 @ 0.1 nm (GW) absolute numbers XFEL peak current: 5 ka energy spread: 2.5 MeV εn = 1 mm mrad εn = 2 mm mrad εn = 3 mm mrad path length in the undulator (m) path length in the undulator (m) XFEL goal: 0.9 mm mrad@injector = 1.4 mm mrad@undulator if even smaller emittance new horizons: shorter wavelength, higher repetition rate Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 7

Situation in 1999 ICFA workshop on high brightness beams at UCLA in autumn 1999: Summary talk of P. O Shea (U Maryland, USA) on electron source developments: Goal for community in next years: Get transverse normalized emittance of 1 mm mrad @ bunch charge of 1 nc!!! Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 8

Different NC photo injectors at SLAC for LCLS (low average current) at Berkeley for NGLS (high average current) at PITZ for FLASH and European XFEL (medium average current) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 9

NC RF Gun Design for LCLS pulsed / CW single bunch charge single bunch rep rate average current norm. trans. emittance (rms, slice) rf frequency pulsed 1.0 / 0.2 nc 120 Hz 120 / 24 na 1.0 / 0.8 mm mrad @ 135 MeV 2856 MHz modified UCLA/BNL/SLAC 1.6 cell S-band gun: - larger mode separation (3.5 15 MHz) - larger iris radius, reduced iris surface field - dual rf feed, z coupling, racetrack shape - field probes in both cells - increased cooling channels - klystron pulse shaping reduced dissipated power improved emittance and stability In-Situ Hydrogen Beam Cleaning of Cathode Surface Initial 1H: 2H: 3H: 4H: Baked: 15 min, 0.7uA 60 min, 0.4uA 40 min, 0.4uA 60 min, 2uA 230 deg ~ 3mC H-ion charge sufficient! LCLS-TN-05-3 After H-beam cleaning 1.2x10-4 tests on unbaked copper sample Courtesy of D. Dowell LCLS QE Specification 2x10-5 @255nm SLAC-PUB-11455 August 2005 Quadrupole (γβ) r (1/m) cylindrical cavity (lc=2.475cm) 8 racetrack cavity (lc=2.413cm) 6 with d=0.315cm 4 racetrack cavity (lc=2.413cm) with d=0.356cm 2 0-2 -4-6 -8-180 -130-80 -30 20 70 120 170 rf phase (degree) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 10 r d r

From Paul Emma, First Lasing -talk at FEL2009 in Liverpool: Injector Transverse Projected Emittance ~0.5 µm Exceptional beam quality from S-band Cu-cath. RF gun Time-sliced x-emittance: 0.4 µm γε x 0.43 µm 0.25 nc 135 MeV 35 A γε y 0.46 µm D. Dowell, et al.

From Paul Emma, First Lasing -talk at FEL2009 in Liverpool: Measurements and Simulations for 20-pC Bunch at 14 GeV MEASURED SLICE EMITTANCE 20 pc 135 MeV γεx = 0.14 µm SIMULATED FEL PULSES 1.5 Å, 3.6 1011 photons Ipk = 4.8 ka γε 0.4 µm Simulation at 1.5 Å based on measured injector & linac beam & Elegant tracking, with CSR, at 20 pc. 15 Å, 2.4 1011 photons, Ipk = 2.6 ka, γε 0.4 µm time-slicing at 20 pc Y. Ding PRL 102 854801 Y. Ding Z. Huang Y. Ding Z. Huang 1.2 fs Simulation at 15 Å based on measured injector & linac beam & Elegant tracking, with CSR & 20 pc.

Some more experimental results from the LCLS gun: > Phy.Rev. ST AB 11, 030703 (2008): 1 nc, 100A bunch, 135 MeV: ε n, x (95%) = 1.14 mm mrad, ε n, y (95%) = 1.06 mm mrad > P. Emma, "Beam Brightness Measurements in the LCLS Injector, Mini-WS on compact XFELs using HBB, LBNL, Berkeley, USA, 2010. 0.25 nc, 35A, 135 MeV ε n, x (95%) = 0.32 mm mrad, ε n, y (95%) = 0.39 mm mrad > J. Frisch, "Operation and Upgrades of the LCLS", LINAC2010, Tsukuba, Japan: 0.02 nc, 135 MeV: ε n, x (95%) = 0.18 mm mrad, ε n, y (95%) = 0.19 mm mrad Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 13

Different NC photo injectors at SLAC for LCLS (low average current) at Berkeley for NGLS (high average current) at PITZ for FLASH and European XFEL (medium average current) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 14

Berkeley approach: NC RF gun design for CW operation (1) Design requirements high duty cycle, high average beam current, low emittance: repetition rate: up to ~1 MHz, CW bunch charge: from ~1 pc to ~1 nc, normalized beam emittance: from sub 10-7 (low charge) to 10-6 m, beam energy at the gun exit: ~500 kev (space charge), electric field at the cathode: ~10 MV/m (space charge limit), bunch length control at cathode: from ~1ps to 10s of ps (to handle space charge effects, for allowing different modes of operation), compatibility with magnetic fields in the cathode and gun regions (mainly for emittance compensation) operational vacuum pressure: 10-9 - 10-11 Torr (high QE photo-cathodes), easy installation and conditioning of different kind of cathodes, high reliability compatible with the operation of a user facility. low RF frequency (from Journal of Modern Optics, Vol. 58, No. 16, 1419-1437) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 15

Berkeley approach: NC RF gun design for CW operation (2) pulsed / CW single bunch charge single bunch rep rate average current norm. trans. emittance (rms, slice) rf frequency CW 0.01 to 1 nc up to 1 MHz up to 1 ma < 1.0 mm mrad (design) 187 MHz (pictures from F. Sannibale, Mini-WS on Compact X-Ray FELs Using High Brightness Beams, LBNL, August, 2010) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 16

Berkeley approach: NC RF gun design for CW operation (3) > APEX phase 0 layout > Under preparation: further diagnostics for 6D phase space characterization and subsequently booster cavities for up to 30 MeV. The following design parameters have already been demonstrated at Berkeley: - full conditioning to max. RF power (100kW in CW mode, allow for 750keV beam energy) - max dark current ~8µA @ 19.5MV/m should be OK for high rep rate FEL operation - first photoelectrons at 1 MHz from temporary molybdenum cathode - beam energy: 745 ± 41 kev - cathode field: >10 MV/m - pressure: ~5x10-11 Torr after baking (RF off, 1 of 20 NEG modules activated) (factor 3-4 higher with RF on) ( from PRST-AB 15, 103501 (2012) ) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 17

Different NC photo injectors at SLAC for LCLS (low average current) at Berkeley for NGLS (high average current) at PITZ for FLASH and European XFEL (medium average current) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 18

The PITZ gun (Photo Injector Test facility at DESY, Zeuthen site) Bucking solenoid Photo cathode (Cs 2 Te) QE~0.5-5% RF gun: L-band (1.3 GHz) NC (copper) standing wave 1.6-cell cavity Coaxial RF coupler Cathode laser 262 / 257 nm 20ps (FWHM) Mirror in vacuum Main scan parameter during measurements Main solenoid, Bz_peak~0.2T Main properties of PITZ gun: Electron bunch 1nC, ~6MeV 1.3 GHz cavity, coaxial RF coupler (flexible solenoid position) Capable of high average power long electron bunch trains (SC linac) Very low normalized transverse emittance Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 19

Some parameters of FLASH and European XFEL pulse trains: repetition rate train length micro pulses: bunch spacing bunch length acc. field in SC cavity (FLASH) ~ RF power 500 µs 900 µs beam time Parameters FLASH European XFEL final beam energy 1.2 GeV 17.5 GeV max. repetition rate 10 Hz 10 Hz max. train length 800 µs 650 µs bunch spacing 1 20 µs 0.2 1 µs required injector emittance (1 nc) 2 mm mrad 0.9 mm mrad SASE output wavelength 4.1 45 nm 0.05 6.4 nm Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 20

current PITZ 2.0 setup

Improvement of the RF gun phase stability (gun has no field probe) 2009 (no FB) 2011 (FB is ON!) FPGA phase, reconstructed from virtual ADC probes based on 2x5MW directional couplers FPGA phase, measured by 10MW in-vacuum directional coupler Zero phase slope within the electron pulse train FPGA phase (chanel[40]) t, µs installed in 2010 phase, deg -80-85 -90-95 -100 Phase of the 1 st bunch measurement # -105 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 measurement# 150 mean=-94.3+/-0.234 deg counts 100 50 Phase fluctuations: 10..15 deg (p-p) 2..4 deg (rms) 0-104 -102-100 -98-96 -94-92 -90-88 -86 phase, deg Phase fluctuations: 1..1.5 deg (p-p) 0.2..0.3 deg (rms) Manufacturer: Mega Industries, USA Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 22

How we measure the transverse projected emittance Single slit scan technique > Emittance Measurement SYstem (EMSY) consists of horizontal / vertical actuators with YAG / OTR screens 10 / 50 µm slits > Beam size is measured @ slit position using screen > Beam local divergence is estimated from beamlet sizes @ observation screen (12 bit camera) 2D corrected normalized RMS emittance ε σ x 2 2 n = βγ x x xx 2 x 2 Observation screen 2.64 m Statistics over all pixels in all beamlets EMSY1 (z = 5.74 m) correction factor ( >1 ) introduced to correct for low intensity losses from beamlet measurements σ x - RMS beam size measured with YAG screen at slit location SQRT(<x 2 >) - RMS beam size at slit location estimated from slit positions and beamlet intensities 100% RMS emittance (conservative estimate) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 23 pixel intensity

High stability of the measurement I_main (A) Xrms, mm Yrms, mm EmitX_2D, mm mrad EmitX_2D, nonscaled XYrms, mm EMSY1 NoP EMSY1 Gain MOI NoP MOI, Gain XBL NoP XBL gain EmitY_2D, mm mrad EmitY_2D, nonscaled YBL NoP YBL gain EmitXY_2D, mm.mrad EmitXY_2D, nonscaled X-scale factor Y-scale factor Example, measurement on 5.5.2011: 1nC, Emittance vs. Imain (gun SP phase=6deg) For all measurements f250 lenses and 2x2 binning were used 398 0.567 0.501 1.104 0.739 0.533 2 23 2 22 16 25 1.034 0.892 15 25 1.068 0.812 1.5 1.3 397 0.359 0.367 0.732 0.583 0.363 1 25 1 24 10 25 0.719 0.650 10 25 0.725 0.616 1.3 1.2 396 0.307 0.320 0.722 0.479 0.313 1 21 1 21 5 25 0.689 0.584 7 24 0.705 0.529 1.5 1.3 395 0.285 0.279 0.770 0.424 0.282 1 18 1 18 3 25 0.779 0.571 5 25 0.774 0.492 1.8 1.6 394 0.269 0.254 0.816 0.408 0.261 1 15 1 16 3 25 0.882 0.646 5 24 0.848 0.513 2.0 1.7 393 0.266 0.234 0.940 0.453 0.249 1 13 1 15 4 23 1.015 0.723 5 25 0.977 0.572 2.1 1.7 ε x =(0.707±0.032) mm mrad ε y =(0.686±0.024) mm mrad ε xy =(0.697±0.026) mm mrad emittance, mm mrad Beam size and 2D emittance for BSA 1.2mm, 1nC, gun 6 deg w.r.t. MMMG, booster on crest 1.5 1.6 1.4 EmitX EmitY 1.4 1.3 EmitXY Xrms 1.2 1.2 1.1 Yrms XYrms 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.0 392 393 394 395 396 Imain, A 397 398 399 beam size, mm 3x3 Statistics Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 24

Emittance vs. Laser Spot size for various charges in 2011 xy-emittance (mm mrad) 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Emittance optimization in 2011 2nC, measured 1nC, meas.(0deg) 1nC, meas.(6deg) 0.25nC, meas. 0.1nC, measured 0.02nC, meas. LCLS, 1nC, 95% LCLS, 0.25nC, 95% LCLS, 0.02nC, 95% 100% RMS emittance data Slice emittance required at XFEL undulator for 1 nc 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 rms laser spot size (mm) Charge, nc Minimum emittance PITZ, 100%, mm mrad 2 1.25 LCLS, 95% mm mrad 1 0.70 1.10 0.7 0.80 0.25 0.33 0.35 0.1 0.21 0.02 0.12 0.19 > PITZ is setting a new benchmark for minimum emittance at a given charge + is capable of operation at fairly high duty cycle!! LCLS data: P. Emma, "Beam Brightness Measurements in the LCLS Injector, Mini-WS on compact XFELs using HBB, LBNL, Berkeley, USA, 2010. J. Frisch, "Operation and Upgrades of the LCLS", LINAC2010, Tsukuba, Japan. PITZ data: M. Krasilnikov et. al., Experimentally Frank Stephan minimized NC RF photo beam injectors emittance for FELs from an LA3NET L-band Workshop, photoinjector CERN, PRST-AB 20.-22.2.2013 15, 100701 Page (2012). 25

Core Emittance for various bunch charges Idea: Cut low intensity region of MEASURED phase space (i.e. remove non-lasing part) 1.6 1.4 1.2 Slice emittance required at XFEL undulator for 1 nc 2 nc (0 deg) 2 nc (+6deg) 1 nc (0 deg) 1 nc (+6 deg) An example for 1 nc: emittance (mm-mrad) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.25 nc (0 deg) 0.1 nc (0 deg) 0.02 nc (0 deg) LCLS, 1nC LCLS, 0.25nC LCLS, 0.02nC 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 charge cut (%) Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 26

2011 PITZ 1.8: measurements vs. simulations xy-emittance (mm mrad) 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 2nC, measured 2nC, simulated 1nC, meas.(0deg) 1nC, meas.(6deg) 1nC, simulated 0.25nC, meas. 0.25nC, simul. 0.1nC, measured ASTRA simulations: cathode laser pulse with 21.5ps FWHM, 2ps rise/fall time 1.0 Optimum machine parameters 0.1nC, simulated (laser spot size, gun phase): 0.8 0.02nC, meas. experiment simulations 0.6 0.02nC, simul. (~on-crest) 0.4 Difference in the optimum laser spot size is bigger for higher 0.2 charges (good agreement for 0.0 100pC) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 RMS laser spot size (mm) For each bunch charge the photo injector has been optimized (both experiment and simulations), but keeping the laser temporal profile fixed. Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 27

Reasons of discrepancy for high Q? Emission from the cathode? bunch charge@low.ict1, nc 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Measured and simulated Schottky scans (1nC) 1nC emittance measurements measured charge (XYrms=0.3mm, LT=62%) measured charge (XYrms=0.3mm, LT=100%) simulated charge (XYrms=0.4mm, Qb=1nC) simulated charge (XYrms=0.3mm, Qb=1nC) 0-60 -40-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 gun phase-mmmg, deg Direct plug-in machine settings into ASTRA does not produce 1nC at the gun operation phase (+6deg), whereas 1nC and even higher charge (~1.2nC) are experimentally detected Simulated (ASTRA) phase scans w/o Schottky effects (solid thick lines) have different shapes than the experimentally measured (thin lines with markers) bunch charge@low.ict1, nc Measured and simulated laser energy scan (1nC) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 Laser intensity (LT) scan for the MMMG phase (red curve with markers) shows higher saturation level, whereas the simulated charge even goes slightly down while the laser intensity (Qbunch) increases Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 28 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 measured charge (XYrms=0.3mm, 0deg) simulated charge (XYrms=0.3mm, 0deg) ~ laser intensity, nc Photo emission (bunch charge) needs more detailed modeling in simulations.

Key components for successful operation of NC RF photoinjectors > good RF stability > good cooling water stability (increasingly difficult for high average RF power) e.g. better than ±0.05 degrees are needed at 50 kw average power for the PITZ case > robust and high quantum efficiency (QE) photo cathodes (especially important for high average current) e.g. the PITZ photo cathode system was developed by INFN-LASA Milano see talk of Daniele Sertore > stable photo cathode laser system with high flexibility e.g. the PITZ photo cathode laser system was developed by the Max-Born-Institute in Berlin see talk of Ingo Will High flexibility of photo cathode laser opens new research possibilities excursion to plasma acceleration fancy shaping of the photo cathode laser pulses can further improve the beam quality Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 29

Photo cathode laser system installed at PITZ (for more see I. Will) Yb:YAG laser with integrated optical sampling system Highly-stable Yb:YAG oscillator E micro = 0.002 µj pulse selector pulse shaper τ ~ 1.7 ps E micro = 0.002 µj Nonlinear fiber amplifier Optical Sampling System (OSS) Resolution: τ < 0.5 1 ps Yb:YAG power regen G ~ 10 6 E micro ~ 2 µj scanning amplifier (Yb:KGW) Two-stage Yb:YAG double-pass amplifier G ~ 40 Pulse selector E micro ~ 80 µj LBO BBO UV output pulses E micro ~ 10 µj Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 30

Photo cathode laser: temporal pulse shaping (for more see I. Will) Multicrystal birefringent pulse shaper containing 13 crystals Gaussian: Shaped ouput pulses motorized rotation stage temperature controlled birefringent crystal Gaussian input pulses FWHM ~ 2 ps FWHM ~ 11 ps FWHM ~ 20 ps FWHM ~7 ps FWHM ~ 17 ps Simulated pulse-stacker edge 10-90 ~ 2.2 ps FWHM = 25 ps OSS signal (UV) edge 10-90 ~ 2 ps Will, Klemz, Optics Express 16 (2008), 4922-14935 FWHM ~ 24 ps FWHM ~ 24 ps birefringent shaper, 13 crystals important for good beam quality high flexibility new options! Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 31

Particle driven plasma wakefield acceleration (PDPWA) ( AWAKE ) e- Courtesy of Carl Schröder, LBNL Does this work? Dephasing? Hose instability? Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 32

LAOLA @ PITZ: Studies for Particle Driven Plasma Acceleration 1) Self-modulation of electron beam (proof of principle for CERNs AWAKE exp.) - use high flexibility of photo cathode laser system: - Example: flat-top e-beam through plasma cell: Bunch 6.35m from cathode: Q = 100 pc L b = 5. 92 mm σ xy = 50. 5 µm ε xy = 0. 375 mm mrad Peak density 10 13 e - /cm 3 Plasma density 10 15 /cm 3 2) Study high transformer ratio - resonantly drive plasma wave with specially shaped electron bunch (5 bunchlets inside the bunch) high transformation ratio: V probe bunch to be sent to bunch compressor Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 33

New option for the photo cathode laser 3D ellipsoid BD simulations for 100 pc bunch charge: Transverse phase spaces at z=5.74m 25 20 15 10 5 Collaboration IAP N.Novgorod / JINR Dubna / DESY for more see Ekaterina Gacheva 0-5 -10-15 -20-25 -1-0.5 0 0.5 1 x, mm Gaussian Flat-top Ellipsoid Longitudinal phase space (Z-Pz) at z=5.74m px, mrad almost no beam halo almost pure sine shape > Benefits from 3D ellipsoidal laser pulses for ALL linac driven light sources: 30-50% lower average slice emittance higher brilliance ~pure sinusoidal longitudinal phase space +3 rd harm. simplify/allow required compression ~no beam halo better signal/noise, reduced radiation damage less sensitive to machine settings higher stability Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 34

Summary > Normal conducting RF photo injectors are a mature and reliable technology to produce high brightness beams for FEL applications > From low to medium average currents (~30µA) a new benchmark in optimizing photo injector performance was demonstrated from M. Krasilnikov et al., PRST-AB 15, 100701 (2012). > For high duty cycle / CW applications the main challenges (cooling, vacuum properties) can be solved see Berkeley approach > High brightness photo injectors are also interesting beyond FEL applications, e.g. plasma acceleration, electron diffraction (REGAE), > Sincere Acknowledgements: to all international colleagues for discussions over the years, colleagues at Hamburg and Zeuthen, the PITZ team, Frank Stephan NC RF photo injectors for FELs LA3NET Workshop, CERN 20.-22.2.2013 Page 35