Chittenden Road Prune Orchard Corning, California

Similar documents
Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Cripps Ranch 76+/- Acres Orchard Development Opportunity Dixon, CA. Presented By:

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

Sacramento River Farmland Anderson, California

Fall River Valley Irrigated Farmland

Old Thomasson Range, Chico, CA

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Ocean County, New Jersey (Larsen & N New Prospect Jackson Twp., NJ)

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

² 2015 Program Year. Farm Tract McLeod County, Minnesota 1:4, NHEL NHEL

Soil Taxonomy Classification Osage County, Kansas. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Victoria County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

FOR SALE. Features Rives Road Petersburg, Virginia Chris Jenkins

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Taxonomy Classification Jackson County, Florida (Chipola River) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

T his map is for illus trative purpos es only and does not repres ent a s urvey. I t is provided 'as is ' without warranty or any repres entation of

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. BOWLSBEY 320 LIBERTY ISLAND ROAD BUYER: RASSMUSSEN TRUST

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Wright County, MN. Overview. Legend

Hartmann Ranch. potential vineyard ground acres +/

Soil Taxonomy Classification Washington County, Florida (Pine Log 631A)

Carrick Road $798,000

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Custom Soil Resource Report for Solano County, California

Soil Taxonomy Classification Gadsden County, Florida (Imperial Nursery)

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

TRACT 7: ±252 Acres Irrigated Farmland Grassland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Using the Web Soil Survey Resilience and Resistance Score Sheet Soils Report

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Northwestern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Stevens County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbus County, North Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Alliance Ag Services, LLC

Custom Soil Resource Report for Island County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon, and Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

For Sale on Bids. Open House By Appointment

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fresno County, California, Western Part

BROWN COUNTY FARMLAND AUCTION

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Atlantic County, New Jersey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Palo Verde Area, California

PARADIGM ODP FORT COLLINS, CO 80525

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan

Custom Soil Resource Report for Custer and Pennington Counties Area, Black Hills Parts, South Dakota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Southwest Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Potter County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

Aqua Dome Express Car Wash

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Prairie Wings One of America s Trophy Waterfowl Hunting Properties.

2.a.. Physical Factors General Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Garfield County, Oklahoma

Custom Soil Resource Report for Livingston Parish, Louisiana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wasco County, Oregon, Northern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Marion County Area, Oregon

Esri Image & Mapping Forum 9 July 2017 Geiger-Mode for Conservation Planning & Design by USDA NRCS NGCE

Aperio Property Consultants, llc E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO Phone (303) Contact: Aaron Thompson

Custom Soil Resource Report for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Re: Leeward Renewable Energy Development Expansion Project Weld County Sketch Plan Drainage Report

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

MILLS COUNTY, IOWA FARMLAND FOR SALE PRICE REDUCED

Wetland Delineation. Proposed CVS Pharmacy 9th Street and US Highway 98 (Avenue E) Apalachicola, Franklin County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

What is a published soil survey?

Custom Soil Resource Report for Washoe County, Nevada, South Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hansford County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Transcription:

AG-LAND INVESTMENT BROKERS 275 Sale Lane / P. O. Box 896 Red Bluff, CA 96080 530.529.4400 office / 530.527.5042 fax Chittenden Road Prune Orchard Corning, California Property: 40.00 acres planted to producing French Prune trees on primarily class II soils suitable for prunes, walnuts, almonds and other crops typical to Tehama County. Location: The property is located 2 +/- miles south Corning, CA and about 1 +/- mile west of Interstate 5. Access is by a 25 easement to Mountain View Avenue. Prunes: The tree spacing is 18 x 18 which equals 134 trees per acre. The west block (10.6 +/- acres) was planted in 1993 & 1994. The east block (29.1 +/- acres) was planted in 1981. The ten year average production is 1.2 dry tons per acre. The 2012 production was 1.4 dry tons per acre. Soils: The primary soils are class II although the property does have some class I and class III soils. The class II soils are AvA, Arbuckle gravelly loam and PkA, Perkins gravelly loam. The class I soil is Mf, Maywood loam. The class III soil is Pm, Perkins-Kimball gravelly loam. Water: The property is within the Corning Water District boundary. For 2013 the water cost was $41.00 per acre foot plus $17.81 per acre for operation / maintenance ($10.41) and debt repayment ($7.40). Most of the debt repayment will be paid off in 2014. Irrigation: The orchard is irrigated with buried PVC irrigation system and Bowsmith orange (7 gph) micro-jet sprinklers attached to aboveground drip tubing. The system is set up into (4) 10 +/- acre blocks. New Pipeline: Seller will pay the cost to install underground approx. 1,320 feet of 8 diameter, 63 pound pvc pipe (63lb). This pipeline will run along the west edge of Seller adjacent 20 acre parcel to Chittenden Road. 2014 Crop: The crop is included with Buyer reimbursement of cultural costs from August 22, 2013 to close of escrow. The information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable, however, accuracy is not guaranteed. AG-LAND Investment Brokers assumes no liability as to errors, omissions or future operating and investment results. Buyer assumes responsibility to perform their own investigation and due diligence. This offering is subject to prior sale, price change or withdrawal from market without notice.

AG-LAND INVESTMENT BROKERS 275 Sale Lane / P. O. Box 896 Red Bluff, CA 96080 530.529.4400 office / 530.527.5042 fax Topography: Level to grade. The property offers exceptional views of three mountain ranges; Sierras, Cascades and Coast range. Zoning: All parcels are zoned EA-B:871 (Exclusive Agricultural, 20 acre minimum). That said, all 4 parcels are conveyable individually. Tehama County Assessor Parcel Numbers 069-240-21, 22, 25 and 26. Current real property taxes are $3,968 per year which includes Corning Water District assessments. Mineral Rights: Seller to retain all oil, gas and minerals rights. Depreciation: Improvements such as the trees and irrigation systems may offer deprecation advantages to a prospective Buyer. Listing Price: $440,000. Sam Mudd, California Brokers License Number 01710463 530.529.4400, office / 530.949-4054, cell sam.mudd@aglandbrokers.com, email www.aglandbrokers.com, website Bert Owens, California Brokers License Number 01707128 530.529.4400, office / 530.524.4900, cell bert.owens@aglandbrokers.com, email www.aglandbrokers.com, website The information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable, however, accuracy is not guaranteed. AG-LAND Investment Brokers assumes no liability as to errors, omissions or future operating and investment results. Buyer assumes responsibility to perform their own investigation and due diligence. This offering is subject to prior sale, price change or withdrawal from market without notice.

565500 565580 565660 565740 565820 565900 122 13' 33'' W 565980 566060 566140 4419340 4419340 39 55' 2'' N 565420 39 55' 17'' N 4418940 4418940 4419020 4419020 4419100 4419100 4419180 4419180 4419260 4419260 39 55' 17'' N 4418860 122 14' 4'' W Irrigated Capability Class Tehama County, California (Vance 40 Acres Prunes) 39 55' 2'' N 565500 565580 565660 565740 565820 Map Scale: 1:3,400 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. N Meters 300 Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 0 50 Natural Resources Conservation Service 100 200 Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 565900 565980 566060 566140 122 13' 33'' W 122 14' 4'' W 565420 8/1/2013 Page 1 of 4

Irrigated Capability Class Tehama County, California (Vance 40 Acres Prunes) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Tehama County, California Survey Area Data: Version 6, Jan 6, 2011 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 12, 2010 Feb 17, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/1/2013 Page 2 of 4

Irrigated Capability Class Tehama County, California Vance 40 Acres Prunes Irrigated Capability Class Irrigated Capability Class Summary by Map Unit Tehama County, California (CA645) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AvA Arbuckle gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Mf Maywood loam, high terrace, 0 to 3 percent slopes PkA Perkins gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Pm Perkins-Kimball gravelly loams, 0 to 3 percent slopes 2 25.7 65.3% 1 4.8 12.1% 2 6.9 17.5% 3 2.0 5.1% Totals for Area of Interest 39.4 100.0% Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/1/2013 Page 3 of 4

Irrigated Capability Class Tehama County, California Vance 40 Acres Prunes Description Land capability classification shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field crops. Crops that require special management are excluded. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops, the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to management. The criteria used in grouping the soils do not include major and generally expensive landforming that would change slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils, nor do they include possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Capability classification is not a substitute for interpretations that show suitability and limitations of groups of soils for rangeland, for woodland, or for engineering purposes. In the capability system, soils are generally grouped at three levels-capability class, subclass, and unit. Only class and subclass are included in this data set. Capability classes, the broadest groups, are designated by the numbers 1 through 8. The numbers indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices. Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require special conservation practices, or both. Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. Class 5 soils are subject to little or no erosion but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 8 soils and miscellaneous areas have limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/1/2013 Page 4 of 4

Corning Water District Information Revised 08/08/2013 The following information is compiled after talking with Jim Louden, Corning Water District Manager. Jim s phone number is (530)824-2914 1) US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) water allotment for Corning Water District (CWD) is for 23,000 acre feet of water per year. 2) Approx. 10,800 acres are within CWD boundaries. 3) For 2013, USBR announced CWD to receive only 75% of water allotment. 4) For 2013, the water cost is $41.00 per acre foot. 5) For 2013, the operation and maintenance assessment is $10.41 per acre. 6) For 2013, the debt repayment to USBR is $7.40 per acre. Most of this debt repayment will be repaid in 2014. 7) Both assessments are included on Tehama Co. property tax bills. 8) Water is delivered via buried pipeline and deliver water to most turnouts at around 23 psi. 9) Most growers using CWD water for drip / micro systems use media filtration not screen filtration.