Chapter: 5 Subdomain boundary nodes

Similar documents
3D Elasticity Theory

Unit 13 Review of Simple Beam Theory

2 Introduction to mechanics

12. Stresses and Strains

HIGHER-ORDER THEORIES

Basic Equations of Elasticity

Content. Department of Mathematics University of Oslo

Aircraft Structures Kirchhoff-Love Plates

HIGHER-ORDER THEORIES

ABHELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Composites Design and Analysis. Stress Strain Relationship

Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension

Symmetric Bending of Beams

Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering

Professor Terje Haukaas University of British Columbia, Vancouver The M4 Element. Figure 1: Bilinear Mindlin element.

Mechanical Properties of Materials

LOWELL JOURNAL. MUST APOLOGIZE. such communication with the shore as Is m i Boimhle, noewwary and proper for the comfort

3. The linear 3-D elasticity mathematical model

Mechanics PhD Preliminary Spring 2017

2 Introduction to mechanics

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

4. Mathematical models used in engineering structural analysis

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis

1 Bending of beams Mindlin theory

Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures, and Intelligent Mechanical Systems

COMPRESSION AND BENDING STIFFNESS OF FIBER-REINFORCED ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS. Abstract. Introduction

5.2 Energy The Kirchhoff Love theory. phospholipid bilayer. cell membrane

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

Kirchhoff Plates: Field Equations

SEMM Mechanics PhD Preliminary Exam Spring Consider a two-dimensional rigid motion, whose displacement field is given by

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 2: Continuum mechanics

CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS FOR LINEAR ELASTIC SOLIDS

Analysis of Infinitely Long Euler Bernoulli Beam on Two Parameter Elastic Foundation: Case of Point Load

Example 3.7 Consider the undeformed configuration of a solid as shown in Figure 3.60.

Free vibration analysis of beams by using a third-order shear deformation theory

NDT&E Methods: UT. VJ Technologies CAVITY INSPECTION. Nondestructive Testing & Evaluation TPU Lecture Course 2015/16.

MANY BILLS OF CONCERN TO PUBLIC

Bending of Simply Supported Isotropic and Composite Laminate Plates

MAE4700/5700 Finite Element Analysis for Mechanical and Aerospace Design

Stress, Strain, Mohr s Circle

Shear stresses around circular cylindrical openings

Elements of Continuum Elasticity. David M. Parks Mechanics and Materials II February 25, 2004

Strain Transformation equations

Lecture 7: The Beam Element Equations.

Chapter 6 2D Elements Plate Elements

7. Hierarchical modeling examples

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF SYNTACTIC FOAM CORE SANDWICH USING A MULTIPLE SCALES BASED ASYMPTOTIC METHOD

Mechanics of materials Lecture 4 Strain and deformation

Details of Semi-Membrane Shell Theory of Hybrid Anisotropic Materials

Rock Rheology GEOL 5700 Physics and Chemistry of the Solid Earth

CHAPTER THREE SYMMETRIC BENDING OF CIRCLE PLATES

AN INTEGRATED KIRCHHOFF PLATE ELEMENT BY GALERKIN METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PLATES ON ELASTIC FOUNDATION

Introduction to Seismology Spring 2008

3 Applications of partial differentiation

Bone Tissue Mechanics

Retrospectives on My Studies of Solid Mechanics (II)

Stress/Strain. Outline. Lecture 1. Stress. Strain. Plane Stress and Plane Strain. Materials. ME EN 372 Andrew Ning

Chapter 12 Plate Bending Elements. Chapter 12 Plate Bending Elements

A HIGHER-ORDER BEAM THEORY FOR COMPOSITE BOX BEAMS

Classical Lamination Theory: The Kirchhoff Hypothesis

MEC-E8001 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams

Stability of Functionally Graded Plate under In-Plane Time-Dependent Compression

16.20 HANDOUT #2 Fall, 2002 Review of General Elasticity

GEOMETRIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS

Analysis of Non-Rectangular Laminated Anisotropic Plates by Chebyshev Collocation Method

MIXED FINITE ELEMENTS FOR PLATES. Ricardo G. Durán Universidad de Buenos Aires

MECH 5312 Solid Mechanics II. Dr. Calvin M. Stewart Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at El Paso

LOWELL WEEKLY JOURNAL

1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams

Chapter 1. Continuum mechanics review. 1.1 Definitions and nomenclature

Module III - Macro-mechanics of Lamina. Lecture 23. Macro-Mechanics of Lamina

Lecture 3: The Concept of Stress, Generalized Stresses and Equilibrium

OWELL WEEKLY JOURNAL

3 2 6 Solve the initial value problem u ( t) 3. a- If A has eigenvalues λ =, λ = 1 and corresponding eigenvectors 1

A consistent dynamic finite element formulation for a pipe using Euler parameters

A short review of continuum mechanics

LOWELL WEEKLY JOURNAL

( ) R kj. = y k y j. y A ( ) z A. y a. z a. Derivatives of the second order electrostatic tensor with respect to the translation of ( ) δ yβ.

Question: 1. Use suitable identities to find the following products:

M5 Simple Beam Theory (continued)

Consider an elastic spring as shown in the Fig.2.4. When the spring is slowly

Macroscopic theory Rock as 'elastic continuum'

Course No: (1 st version: for graduate students) Course Name: Continuum Mechanics Offered by: Chyanbin Hwu

Mechanics of Materials Lab

Locking phenomena in Computational Mechanics: nearly incompressible materials and plate problems

Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures, and Intelligent Mechanical Systems

Introduction, Basic Mechanics 2

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Dr. D. Dinev, Department of Structural Mechanics, UACEG

1. A polynomial p(x) in one variable x is an algebraic expression in x of the form

Game Physics. Game and Media Technology Master Program - Utrecht University. Dr. Nicolas Pronost

Stress equilibrium in southern California from Maxwell stress function models fit to both earthquake data and a quasi-static dynamic simulation

Appendix C. Modal Analysis of a Uniform Cantilever with a Tip Mass. C.1 Transverse Vibrations. Boundary-Value Problem

Lecture M1 Slender (one dimensional) Structures Reading: Crandall, Dahl and Lardner 3.1, 7.2

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I

L2. Bending of beams: Normal stresses, PNA: , CCSM: chap 9.1-2

Numerical Approach for Torsion Properties of Built-Up Runway Girders

Load Cell Design Using COMSOL Multiphysics

Exact and Numerical Solution of Pure Torsional Shaft

Transcription:

Chapter: 5 MEK4560 The Finite Element Method in Solid Mechanics II (February 11, 2008) (E-post:torgeiru@math.uio.no) Page 1 of 19

5 Thick plates 3 5.1 ssumptions..................................... 3 5.2 Kinematics...................................... 6 5.3 The material law................................... 8 5.4 Potential energy................................... 9 5.5 Equilibrium equations I............................... 10 5.6 Boundary conditions................................. 13 5.7 Equilibrium equations II............................... 15 5.8 Summary....................................... 17 References 19 Page 2 of 19

5. Thick plates In this Chapter we derive model for thick plates, called Mindlin-Reissner plates, following the same path as for beams and thin plates. In Chapter Chapter 4 we derived a model for thin plates and we recall that the potential energy functional had terms with second order derivatives, thus a conforming finite element method require C 1 continuity across inter element boundaries. The Mindlin-Reissner model for thick plates involves only second derivatives in the potential energy functional, consequently C 0 continuity is sufficient in a conforming finite element method. However, shear locking is a problem for sufficiently thin plates, similar to the Mindlin-Reissner beam. The material on plates is found in [Cook et al., 2002] [1] Chapters 15.1, 15.2, 15.3, 15.4 and 15.5. The derivation follow [Hughes, 1987] [2]. Page 3 of 19 [1] R. D. Cook, D. S. Malkus, M. E. Plesha, and R. J. Witt. Concepts and pplications of Finite Element nalysis. Number ISBN: 0-471-35605-0. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 4th edition, October 2002. [2] T. J. R. Hughes. The Finite Element Method, Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element nalysis. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987.

5.1. ssumptions The thick plate theory is based on the following assumptions: 1. The geometry; V = { (x, y, x) R 3 (x, y) R 2, z [ t 2, t ]} 2 where t is the thickness of the plate and is the middle plane. 2. Plane stress, σ zz = 0. 3. Small displacements and rotations: w(x, y) << t, sin α = α = θ y and similarly for rotations around the x-axis. 4. The displacements in the plane is given by: u(x, y, z) = zθ y (x, y) and v(x, y, z) = zθ x (x, y) (5.1) where two new parameters are introduced in order to model the rotation of a fiber 1 5. The out of plane displacements are independent of z, w(x, y, z) = w(x, y). Page 4 of 19 1 The line defined by fixing (x, y) in equation (5.1) is a fiber, while the plane defined by fixing z is a lamina.

Remark 5.1 One could also add axial displacements in the x and y directions. Since we use the mid plane in the model, the axial terms are independent of the bending terms. We therefor concentrate on the bending part in our derivation. Remark 5.2 In general the thickness may be a function of x and y, t = t(x, y). gain, the variation should not introduce three dimensional stress effects. Remark 5.3 Other definitions of positive angles are used by some authors. In [Hughes, 1987] [2] the sign of the angles are chosen to be able to use an index form of tensor notation. [2] T. J. R. Hughes. The Finite Element Method, Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element nalysis. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987. Page 5 of 19

z u(x) z θ y (x) y t w(x, y) x x Figure 5.1: Plate geometry. Deformation of a plate in a y cross section. Page 6 of 19 Item 2 and 4 above are inconsistent, however experience show that the model is useful in practice. Since vi har innført muligheten for at platefibrene ikke trenger å være normalt på referanseplanet har vi skjærtøyninger på tvers.

5.2. Kinematics Displacements: bove the displacements where defined as u(x, y, z) = zθ y (x, y), v(x, y, z) = zθ x (x, y) and w(x, y, z) = w(x, y) see also Figure 5.1 This can be summarized as: Plane cross sections remains plane after deformation, but not necessarily normal to the reference plane. Using the displacement field it is straightforward to find: strains, stresses, equilibrium, and the potential energy functional. Strains: The strains are out of plane: ε = ε xx ε yy γ xy γ xz u,x zθ y,x v,y zθ x,y = u,y + v,x = zθ x,x + zθ y,y w,x + u,z θ y + w,x Page 7 of 19 γ yz w,y + v,z θ x + w,y

It is convenient to split the strain vector in two parts: ( ) where ε b is the bending part: and ε s is the shear part: ε b = ε xx ε yy γ xy ε s = ε = ε b ε s = z θ x,y = zκ θ x,x θ y,y ( γ xz γ yz θ y,x ) ( ) θ = y + w,x θ x + w,y Here γ αz is the difference between the normal fiber and the material fiber.. Remark 5.4 The plate theaory also has microscopic inconsistencies. The normal strains, ε zz, are zero and this indicate a plane strain condition. However, the assumption σ zz = 0 is more physical. For an isotropic material this is possible only when ν = 0. Page 8 of 19 5.3. The material law The relations between stress and strains are from the relation for linearized elasticity: σ = Eε

For thick plates it is convenient to split it into two parts: ( ) ( ) ( ) σ σ = b E = b 0 ε b where σ b = σ s 0 E s ε s σ xx σ yy σ xy ( and σ s = The stresses are integrated across the thickness to obtain moments and shear forces: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) M t 2 zσ = b D dz = b 0 κ Q σ s 0 D s ε s t 2 σ xz σ yz ) (5.2) where D b = t 2 t 2 z 2 E b dz and D s = Note that if E b and E s are constant across the plate t 2 t 2 E s dz D b = t3 12 E b and D s = te s (5.3) Remark 5.5 To be consistent with the classical theory a shear correction factor κ may be introduced, and D s = κd s. For plates the correction factor is κ = 5 6. Page 9 of 19

5.4. Potential energy The potential energy is found from the general expression for strain energy, where the internal strain energy is written as a sum of bending and shear energy: Π(w, θ x, θ y ) = U b (κ) + U s (ε s ) W = 1 κ T D b κ + ε T s D s ε s d 2 qw d Note that if the shear strains are zero, i.e. w,x θ y = 0 and w,y + θ x = 0, the energy functional is equal to the functional for thin plates. Remark 5.6 The shear strains measure the differences in angles between a plane normal to the axis after deformation and the actual plane given by θ x and θ y Remark 5.7 Using (5.3) the potential energy functional becomes Π(w, θ x, θ y ) = 1 t 3 2 12 κt E b κ + tε T s E s ε s d qw d (5.4) Thus, when t becomes small the shear term dominates the equation and shear locking occurs. Remark 5.8 The potential energy functional is not complete, a number of boundary terms may be added to take non homogeneous boundary conditions into account, see Hughes [Hughes, 1987]. For some terms see subsection 5.7. Remark 5.9 In order to find the correct definition of signs of the angles and definition of the boundary condition, refer to the manual of the FEM program. Page 10 of 19

5.5. Equilibrium equations I Recall from Chapter 4 that the functions w and θ minimizing the potential energy functional satisfies κ T (φ)d b κ(θ) + ε T s (φ, v)d s ε s (θ, w) d = qv d for all φ and v (5.5) where θ and φ are vector functions ( θ = θ x θ y ) and φ = ( φ x φ y ) (5.6) In order to derive the equilibrium equations from the weak form Greens formula is used. It is convenient to use the moments and shear forces in the weak formulation κ T (φ)m(θ) + ε T s (φ, v)q(θ, w) d = qv d for all φ and v (5.7) Here κ T (φ)m = φ y,x M xx + φ x,y M yy + (φ x,x φ y,y )M xy (5.8) and ε T s (φ, v)q = φ y Q xz + v,x Q xz φ x Q yz + v,y Q uz (5.9) Page 11 of 19

Greens formula is used one each moment term φ y,x M xx d = φ y M xx n x ds φ x,y M yy d = φ x M yy n y ds φ x,x M xy d = φ x M xy n x ds φ y,y M xy d = φ y M xy n y ds φ y M xx,x d (5.10) φ x M yy,y d (5.11) φ x M xy,x d (5.12) φ y M xy,y d (5.13) (5.14) and on each force therm with force multiplied with the derivative of the basis function v v,x Q xz d = v Q xz n x ds v Q xz,x d (5.15) v,y Q yz d = v Q yz n y ds v Q yz,y d (5.16) (5.17) Page 12 of 19 Collecting terms we obtain φ y (M xx,x + M xy,y + Q xz ) φ x (M yy,y + M xy,x + Q yz ) v(q xz,x + Q yz,y ) d + φ y (M xx n x + M xy n y ) + φ x (M yy n y + M xy n x ) + v(q xz n x + Q yz n y ) ds = q v d

Setting φ x = φ y = 0 and v = 0 on the boundary, it follows that in the mid plane of the plate. Q xz x + Q yz y = q (5.18) Setting φ x = 0 and φ y = v = 0 on the boundary, it follows that in the mid plane of the plate. M xx x + M xy y + Q xz = 0 (5.19) Setting φ x = φ y = v = 0 on the boundary, it follows that in the mid plane of the plate. M xy x + M yy y + Q yz = 0 (5.20) Substituting the expressions (5.2) into equations (5.18), (5.19) and (5.20) we obtain a set of three coupled second order partial differential equations. In addition suitable boundary conditions are required. Page 13 of 19 5.6. Boundary conditions In order to proceed, we set φ x = φ y = 0 on the boundary. Then Q xz n x + Q yz n y = Q n = 0 (5.21)

on (a part) of the boundary The last term we rewrite using the normal and tangential part of the vector function ( φ y, φ x ), i.e. ( ) ( ) ( ) φ y = n T φ y n + s T φ y s = φ s n + φ n s (5.22) φ x φ x Using this φ y (M xx n x + M xy n y ) + φ x (M xy n x + M yy n y ) ( ) M = ( φ y φ x ) xx n x + M xy n y = φ s M nn + φ n M ns = 0 (5.23) M xy n x + M yy n y φ x The homogeneous boundary conditions are summarized in the table below: Condition B C Clamped w = 0 θ n = 0 θ s = 0 Free Q n = 0 M ns = 0 M nn = 0 Simply supported, hard w = 0 θ n = 0 M nn = 0 Simply supported, soft w = 0 M ns = 0 M nn = 0 Symmetric around s Q n = 0 M ns = 0 θ s = 0 ntisymmetric around s w = 0 θ n = 0 M nn = 0 Page 14 of 19

Note that the clamped boundary conditions are essential conditions and is usually enforced in the finite element space, while the free conditions are natural conditions and are part of the functional if they are non-homogeneous. The others are a mixture of essential and natural conditions. In order to incorporate non-homogeneous conditions the potential energy functional can be taken to be Π(w, θ x, θ y ) = 1 κ T D b κ + ε T s D s ε s d qw d [Q n w + M nn θ s + M ns θ n ] ds 2 S where Q n, M nn and M ns are given quantities on the boundary. The boundary can be divided in different pieces S = S w S Q where S w S Q = Similarly and S = S θn S Mns where S θn S Mns = S = S θs S Mnn where S θs S Mnn = Note that there are two possibilities for Simply supported conditions. In some cases the hard condition is to strong, the model predict a stiffer plate than the soft condition. For thin plates there was corner forces, for Mindlin-Reissner plates a substantial increase in Q n is observed for corners with soft conditions. This is more realistic than concentrated corner forces. The increase in forces is not observed with hard conditions. Page 15 of 19

Not that the boundary conditions for thick plate theory are different from classical thin plate theory. 5.7. Equilibrium equations II Since shear strains are included, the equilibrium equations can also be derived from the three dimensional model of solid mechanics, see MEK4550. The equilibrium equations can be written σ ij x j + F i = 0 (5.24) Integrating across the thickness in the x-direction of the equation becomes t 2 t 2 σ xx x + σ xy y + σ xz z + F x dz = 0 where the integral of σ xx and σ xy across the thickness is zero in our case, no axial forces. Similarly in the y-direction. Integration of the z equation result in t 2 t 2 σ xz x + σ yz y + σ zz z Here we have used Equation 5.2, σ zz = 0 and q z = + F z dz = Q x x + Q y y + q z = 0 t 2 t 2 F z dz Page 16 of 19

In order to derive the momentum equations, multiply Equation 5.24 with z: t 2 t 2 ( σxx z x + σ xy y + σ ) xz z + F x dz = M xx x + M xy + Q x m x = 0 (5.25) y Here m x is zero in our case. For the y-direction t 2 t 2 ( σxy z x + σ yy y + σ ) yz z + F y dz = M xy x + M yy + Q y m y = 0 y =0 5.8. Summary In summary: Highest derivative m (in the PMPE) 1 Highest derivative 2m (in the differential equation) 2 Kinematic boundary conditions 0 (w, θ n, θ s ) Natural boundary conditions 1 (M nn, M ns, Q n ) Continuity requirements m 1 0 (w, θ x, θ y ) Page 17 of 19 Note, only C 0 continuity is required for a finite element method.

Øving 5.1 Vis hvordan vi kommer fram til ligning Equation 5.25. Hva skjuler seg i m x? (nta at vi har kjente størrelser på flaten S t = (x, y, t/2) (x, y, t/2). Benytt ligningene fra elastisitetsteori.) Øving 5.2 Varier tykkelsen på platen gitt i Øving 4.2. Benytt NSYS eller COMSOL Multiphysics til å finne ut når platen begynner å bli tykk. Benytte grenseverdiene gitt i Kapittel 4 som utganspunkt. Hvordan er hjørnekreftene sammenlignet med tynnplateteori? randkrav. Øving 5.3 Benytt NSYS og løs Oppgave C15.2 i [Cook et al., 2002] [1]. Benytt både harde og myke Page 18 of 19 [1] R. D. Cook, D. S. Malkus, M. E. Plesha, and R. J. Witt. Concepts and pplications of Finite Element nalysis. Number ISBN: 0-471-35605-0. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 4th edition, October 2002.

. References [Cook et al., 2002] Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., Plesha, M. E., and Witt, R. J. (2002). Concepts and pplications of Finite Element nalysis. Number ISBN: 0-471-35605-0. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 4th edition. [Hughes, 1987] Hughes, T. J. R. (1987). The Finite Element Method, Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element nalysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Page 19 of 19