Evolving Disks in Cold Dark Matter Cosmology

Similar documents
Major Review: A very dense article" Dawes Review 4: Spiral Structures in Disc Galaxies; C. Dobbs and J Baba arxiv "

Outline. Walls, Filaments, Voids. Cosmic epochs. Jeans length I. Jeans length II. Cosmology AS7009, 2008 Lecture 10. λ =

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 30 Jan 2003

Galaxy Formation: Overview

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 13 Jan 2004

Zoccali et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 931. Overview of (old) Galactic components. bulge, thick disk, metal-weak halo. metallicity & age distribution

Disk Formation and the Angular Momentum Problem. Presented by: Michael Solway

Galaxy Formation Now and Then

Two Phase Formation of Massive Galaxies

The Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Clusters

Chapter 21 Galaxy Evolution. How do we observe the life histories of galaxies?

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

Implementing sub-grid treatments of galactic outflows into cosmological simulations. Hugo Martel Université Laval

The origin of lopsidedness in galaxies

Astronomy 730. Evolution

A new mechanism for the formation of PRGs

Chapter 20 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Galaxies and the Foundation of Modern Cosmology Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 15 Galaxies and the Foundation of Modern Cosmology

The structure and evolution of stars. Learning Outcomes

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 3 Nov 2006

Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

What do we need to know about galaxy formation?

Formation of z~6 Quasars from Hierarchical Galaxy Mergers

Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics:

Chapter 20 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective. Seventh Edition. Galaxies and the Foundation of Modern Cosmology Pearson Education, Inc.

Astro-2: History of the Universe

The Millennium Simulation: cosmic evolution in a supercomputer. Simon White Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

AGN feedback and its influence on massive galaxy evolution

The Universe of Galaxies: from large to small. Physics of Galaxies 2012 part 1 introduction

THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY DISK

The Accretion History of the Milky Way

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 19 Nov 1999

The Iguaçu Lectures. Nonlinear Structure Formation: The growth of galaxies and larger scale structures

PATRICIA B. TISSERA. Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics Argentina

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

Supernova Feedback in Low and High Mass Galaxies: Luke Hovey 10 December 2009

GALAXIES 626. The Milky Way II. Chemical evolution:

Two Main Techniques. I: Star-forming Galaxies

Chapter 19 Galaxies. Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Each dot is a galaxy of stars. More distant, further into the past. halo

Normal Galaxies (Ch. 24) + Galaxies and Dark Matter (Ch. 25) Symbolically: E0.E7.. S0..Sa..Sb..Sc..Sd..Irr

The dark matter crisis

Upcoming class schedule

Galaxy Evolution. Part 4. Jochen Liske Hamburger Sternwarte

AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models

GALAXIES. Edmund Hodges-Kluck Andrew Ptak

Three Major Components

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

Large-Scale Structure

Chapter 20 Galaxies and the Foundation of Modern Cosmology Pearson Education, Inc.

Lecture 30. The Galactic Center

Recent Progress in Modeling of Galaxy Formation. Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)

AST Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy. Lecture 20. Black Holes Part II

ASTRO 310: Galactic & Extragalactic Astronomy Prof. Jeff Kenney

Today. Lookback time. ASTR 1020: Stars & Galaxies. Astronomy Picture of the day. April 2, 2008

BUILDING GALAXIES. Question 1: When and where did the stars form?

Dark matter and galaxy formation

The visible constituents of the Universe: Non-relativistic particles ( baryons ): Relativistic particles: 1. radiation 2.

Galaxies and the expansion of the Universe

SURVEYS: THE MASS ASSEMBLY AND STAR FORMATION HISTORY

Astro 358/Spring 2008 (49520) Galaxies and the Universe

The Formation of Galaxies: connecting theory to data

8.1 Structure Formation: Introduction and the Growth of Density Perturbations

Using Globular Clusters to. Study Elliptical Galaxies. The View Isn t Bad... Omega Centauri. Terry Bridges Australian Gemini Office M13

Galaxies 626. Lecture 3: From the CMBR to the first star

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 17 Aug 2001

Astro 358/Spring 2008 (49520) Galaxies and the Universe

Other stellar types. Open and globular clusters: chemical compositions

Galaxies. With a touch of cosmology

The cosmic distance scale

Spiral Structure. m ( Ω Ω gp ) = n κ. Closed orbits in non-inertial frames can explain the spiral pattern

Chapter 20: Galaxies and the Foundation of Modern Cosmology

Gravitational Radiation from Coalescing SMBH Binaries in a Hierarchical Galaxy Formation Model

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 4 Dec 2007

Feedback and Galaxy Formation

ASTR 610 Theory of Galaxy Formation Lecture 18: Disk Galaxies

Clusters: Observations

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 15 Dec 2006

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 31 Jul 1998

Astro2010 Science White Paper: The Galactic Neighborhood (GAN)

Galaxies. Galaxy Diversity. Galaxies, AGN and Quasars. Physics 113 Goderya

Black Holes in the Early Universe Accretion and Feedback

Active Galaxies and Galactic Structure Lecture 22 April 18th

Clicker Question: Galaxy Classification. What type of galaxy do we live in? The Variety of Galaxy Morphologies Another barred galaxy

The Merger History of Massive Galaxies: Observations and Theory

AST541 Lecture Notes: Galaxy Formation Dec, 2016

Science with the New Hubble Instruments. Ken Sembach STScI Hubble Project Scientist

A galaxy is a self-gravitating system composed of an interstellar medium, stars, and dark matter.

II. Morphology and Structure of Dwarf Galaxies

University of Naples Federico II, Academic Year Istituzioni di Astrofisica, read by prof. Massimo Capaccioli. Lecture 16

EVOLUTION OF DUST EXTINCTION AND SUPERNOVA COSMOLOGY

In Quest of a True Model of the Universe 1

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.ga] 11 Jun 2010

Our Galaxy. We are located in the disk of our galaxy and this is why the disk appears as a band of stars across the sky.

The Role Of Globular Clusters During Reionization

Outline: Part II. The end of the dark ages. Structure formation. Merging cold dark matter halos. First stars z t Univ Myr.

Gas accretion in Galaxies

Formation and growth of galaxies in the young Universe: progress & challenges

Observational Evidence of AGN Feedback

Moment of beginning of space-time about 13.7 billion years ago. The time at which all the material and energy in the expanding Universe was coincident

The formation and evolution of globular cluster systems. Joel Pfeffer, Nate Bastian (Liverpool, LJMU)

Transcription:

Evolving Disks in Cold Dark Matter Cosmology C. B. Brook 1, H. Martel 1 1 Université Laval, Québec, Qc, G1K-7P4 Canada B. K. Gibson 2.3, D. Kawata 2 2 Swinburne University, Vic., Australia and 3 School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Australia Despite having entered the era of precision cosmology, the formation of galaxies within the favored CDM cosmological paradigm remains problematic. By relating our N-body/smooth particle hydro-dynamical simulation to an extensive range of Galactic and extragalactic observations, we shed light on the formation and evolution of the Milky Way and other late type galaxies. In light of recent observations of the stellar populations of extragalactic thick disks, we examine the proposal that the thick disk formed in a high redshift period characterized by gas rich merging. We show such a scenario to be consistent with color observations. We then follow the evolution of structural parameters of the subsequently formed disk galaxy, from redshift 1 to the present. Consistent with observation, little evolution in the ratio of scale-height to scale-length is found in our simulated galaxy, despite its somewhat chaotic origins. The simulated galaxy in this report forms part of a larger study of a suite of galaxies, with which these issues are to be studied in detail. 1. INTRODUCTION The age of precision cosmology is upon us, with concordance values of cosmological parameters placing us in an accelerating Universe, composed primarily of dark energy ( 73%), and dark matter ( 23%), with a mere smattering of baryonic matter ( 4%). The evolution of structure on large scales is driven by gravity, and such structures as clusters and filaments of galaxies are exceedingly well explained by the ΛCDM paradigm. Yet on the scale galaxies, problems persist. In some sense this is not surprising, as on smaller scales, baryonic processes become important; gas dynamics, star formation, quasars, Active Galactic Nucleii, supernovae, shocks, and ram pressure are some of the processes that add complexity beyond gravity driven structure formation. Our work is aimed at unravelling the major processes which determine how galaxies form within the context of hierarchical structure build. The recently emerging conviction that thick disks are prevalent in disk galaxies, and their seemingly ubiquitous old ages [1], means that the formation of the thick disk, perhaps more than any other component, holds the key to unraveling the evolution of the Milky Way, and indeed all disk galaxies. In an earlier study [2], we proposed that the thick disk was formed in an epoch of gas rich mergers, at high redshift. This hypothesis was based on comparing N- body/sph simulations to a variety of Galactic and extragalactic observations, including stellar kinematics, ages and chemical properties. Recently, the stellar populations in four nearby edge-on disk galaxies were resolved [3], and it was confirmed that thick disks are common features of spiral galaxies. Thick disk populations of all galaxies in this sample are old and relatively metal rich, and no significant color gradient with height above the plane ( V I/ Z) is apparent. These observations will provide further constraints to our thick disk formation scenario, which we probe in this study by examining how the ages and metallicties of our simulated thick disk stars vary with height above the plane. Meanwhile, in a study of 34 edge-on disk galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field [4], selected for apparent diameter larger than 1.3 and unperturbed morphology, it was shown that distant and local disk galaxies are globally similar in their relative thickness or flatness, as characterised by the ratio of scale-height to scalelength (h z /h l ). Disks at redshift z 1 are smaller, in absolute value, than present day disk galaxies, and have a flatness ratio, h z /h l, only slightly larger, by a factor 1.5. We examine the evolution of our simulated disk galaxy in the epoch which follows thick disk formation, in light of these observations, to determine whether a choatic thick disk formation epoch is consistent with a galaxy whose structural parameters do not evolve much since around redshift 1. The galaxy presented in this conference proceeding is the first of an ongoing study of a suite of simulated galaxies, which will probe deeper into the issues presented here, and will be detailed in [5] & [6]. 2. CODE AND MODEL We analyse data from the simulated late type galaxy from a previous study [2]. Our Galactic Chemodynamical code, (GCD+), models the effects of gravity, gas dynamics, radiative cooling, and star formation in a self-consistent manner. Type Ia and Type II supernova feedback are included, and we trace the lifetimes of individual stars when monitoring the chemical enrichment history of our simulated galaxies. Details of GCD+ can be found in [7]. We assume that 10 51 ergs is fed back as thermal energy from each SNe. An adiabatic phase is applied to gas heated by SNe II explosions. 1

Figure 1: Density plots of the evolution of the distribution of stars (upper panels) and gas (lower), shown face on, of the simulated galaxy between redshift z = 1.6 and z = 1.1.Axis are 100 kpc. This epoch is characterised by a series of merger events. We use the semi-cosmological version of GCD+, with an isolated sphere of dark matter and gas as initial condition. Small scale density fluctuations are superimposed on the sphere, parameterized by σ 8, which seed local collapse and subsequent star formation. Solid-body rotation is imparted to the initial sphere to incorporate the effects of longer wavelength fluctuations. For the model described here, the relevant parameters include the total mass (5 10 11 M ), baryon fraction (Ω b = 0.1), star formation efficiency, c =0.05, spin parameter (λ = 0.0675), and σ 8 = 0.5. We employed 38911 dark matter and 38911 gas/star particles. 3. RESULTS Figure 2: Out of the plane direction (W) velocity dispersion versus log stellar age (Gyrs), plotted as red squares. Observations of solar neighbourhood stars are also shown, taken from [9] (triangles with error bars) and [11] (which selects for thin disk stars, + symbols). An abrupt increase in velocity dispersion at 10 Gyrs is apparent in the observations, and a similar abrupt increase is apparent in the simulated galaxy at 8.5 Gyrs. Our final simulated galaxy has properties resembling the Milky Way. The galaxy has a dominant, exponential (scale-length 4.5 kpc), rotating disk comprising primarily young, metal rich stars. It also has a low mass, low metallicity, pressure supported stellar halo (for details see [8], which examines the same simulated disk galaxy). 3.1. Thick Disk Formation The epoch of thick disk formation is depicted in Figure 2, which shows density plots of the evolution of the distribution of star particles (upper panels) and gas (lower), shown face on, of the simulated galaxy between redshift z = 1.6 and z = 1.1. Axis are 100 kpc. The velocity dispersion-age plot (Figure 1) provides evidence that our simulated galaxy has a thick disk component, in close agreement with the velocity dispersion-age relation for solar neighbourhood stars [9], using data of [10]. The abrupt increase in velocity dispersion corresponds to end of the epoch depicted in Figure 2. This epoch, is by far the most chaotic period in the galaxies evolution. At the beginning of this epoch, at least four proto-galaxies of significant mass exist. These building blocks are gas rich, with combined gas mass of 2.4 10 10 M, compared with stellar mass of 7.0 10 9 M. By 9 Gyrs ago, a single central galaxy has emerged. 2

to these plots. The relative thickness to flatness can be parameterised by the ratio of scale-height to scalelength, h z /h l. This value is only larger by a factor of 1.2 in our simulated galaxy at z = 0.72 compared with the present. 3.3. Merger Histories Figure 3: the relation of the metallicity ([Fe/H]) of our simulated thick disk stars with height (kpc) above the plane. Very little gradient is apparent. Figure 4: log age versus height for the thick disk stars of our simulated galaxy. There is no gradient apparent. Our thick disk stars have metallicity [Fe/H] -0.5 out to 2 kpc from the plane (Figure 3). The nature of thick disk formation ensures that our simulated thick disk stars are old, and that there is little variation in age with Z (Figure 4). 3.2. Evolution of structural parameters The evolution of our simulated galaxy, in late epochs after the disk has formed, is shown in Figure 5, where we plot the I-band luminosity at three times, z = 0.72 (left panels), z = 0.46 (middle), and z = 0 (right), both edge-on (upper panels) and face-on (lower). The scale parameters of our disks can be measured by examination of radial and vertical luminosity profiles, shown in the I-band in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. It is evident that these parameters have not evolved much since the time that the disk galaxy has settled down. The luminosity surface density profiles in Figure 6 & 7 are shown at redshifts z = 0.72 in red, z = 0.46 in yellow and z = 0 in blue. We derive scale-lengths and scale-heights by fitting exponentials We make now a statistical study of merger histories in a ΛCDM model with Ω 0 = 0.27, λ 0 = 0.73, and H 0 = 71 kms 1 Mpc 1, using a P 3 M algorithm [12], [13]. In our initial run, we simulated a comoving cubic volume of size L box = 100 Mpc, using 128 3 particles. The mass per particle was 1.801 10 10 M. We identified a region of size 30 Mpc 35 Mpc 28 Mpc in which several Milky-Way-like halos formed. We zoom-in by increasing the resolution of the code by 2 in each directions in the region of interest and rerunning the simulation. This simulation has 2.5 million particles, with mass per particle in the region of interest of 2.251 10 9 M. This is sufficient to resolve the relatively large building blocks which we are interested in. We have 58 halos with masses in the range (0.5 1.1) 10 12 M. We plot, in Figure 8, the average number of building blocks versus lookback time for our 58 Milky Way sized dark matter halos. To qualify as a building block, the merging sub-halo must be 10 10 M, add at least 4% to the mass of the halo, and be merged to the largest (central) halo by the next timestep. Thus, this plot summarises the history the build up of Milky Way sized halos (see [5] for details). A peak merging period around 10 Gyrs ago, before a relatively quiescent final 7-8 Gyrs, is indicated by our plot, and provide support to the disk galaxy evolution scenario presented here. 4. DISCUSSION The properties of disk galaxies have proven to be difficult to accommodate within the favoured Cold Dark Matter cosmological paradigm. Complex gas processes involving energy feedback, for example from quasars, supernovae and stellar winds, and multiple gas phases, have proven difficult to model. yet these processes appear to be crucial in the formation and evolution of disk galaxies within the context of hierarchical structure assembly. Here we report on a simulated disk galaxy, and match to recent observations of local and distant (z 1) disk galaxies. In forming our simulated galaxy, feedback and gas physics proved crucial ingredients [8] in forming a realistic disk galaxy. We now have have a suite of four simulated disk galaxies, and the galaxy presented here will form an extensive study of disk galaxy formation and evolution ([5] & [6] ) as we build up a statistical sample with which to interpret observations. 3

Figure 5: We zoom in to axis of 40 kpc, and show the I-band luminosity plots of our simulated galaxy, both edge-on (upper panels) and face on (lower panels). The flattened nature of the galaxy is apparent by the 1 st panel. The galaxy evolves relatively quiescently during the final 8 Gyrs. [t] Figure 6: I-band luminosity of the simulated galaxy versus radius, in the galactic plane, taken at three redshifts. The earliest timestep (z = 0.72, red) is taken after significant mergers have finished. An intermediate timestep (z = 0.46, yellow) and present (blue) are also shown. The exponential nature of the disks between 5 15 kpc allows scale-lengths to be derived. The simulated disk galaxy is shown to have a thick disk component. This is evidenced by the velocity dispersion versus age relation for solar neighbourhood Figure 7: I-band luminosity versus height above the plane. Symbols as for Figure 6. Exponentials are fitted between 0.5 and 1.5 kpc to derive scale-heights. stars (Figure 1). Our simulations indicate that the thick disk is created in an epoch of of multiple mergers of gas rich building blocks, during which a central galaxy is formed [2], and it was shown that such a scenario is consistent with present observations of the Galactic and extragalactic thick disks. Recently, 4

formation epoch, when a late type galaxy has clearly formed. We derive a value of h z /h l which is larger by a factor 1.2 in our simulated galaxy at z = 0.72 compared with the z = 0. Thus, even though a chaotic period of merging which led to the emrergence of the thick disk was involved in the birth of our simulated disk galaxy, once a disk emerges, the global structure does not evolve to a large extent. We found the disk does get larger and slighlty flatter. Acknowledgments Figure 8: The average number of building blocks versus lookback time (see text for details). observations of four edge-on galaxies explored properties of their stellar populations as a function of height [3]. All showed thick disks composed of red stellar populations, which are old and metal rich. V I colour gradients were seen to be zero or slighlty positive. These observations do not support thick disks which form through dissipative disk formation, accretion from shredded satllites, or slow heating of the thin disk. Heating through galaxy interactions more than 3 Gyrs ago are not ruled out. In Figures 3 & 4, we show the metallicity and age of the thick disk stars in our simulated galaxy. We see that our thick disk formation scenario results in stellar populations which can match the observations. Although accretion from galactic building blocks are involved in our model, these accreted building blocks have high gas fraction. Astration during and after murders, as well as ongoing disspiative infall of gas, eliminates differences in metallicity of original and accreting material. Thus little metallicity gradient is seen in our simulated thick disk. The rapid star formation in this epoch ensures that thick disk stars are almost exclusively old, and a lack of gradient with height. In a study of 34 edge-on disk galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field [4], galaxies out to redshift 1 were shown to have scale parameters similar to local disk galaxies. These parameters are characterised by the ratio of scale-height to scale-length (h z /h l ). Disks at redshift z 1 are smaller, in absolute value, than present day disk galaxies. However, their flatness ratio, h z /h l, is only slightly larger, by a factor 1.5. We examine our simulated disk galaxy from a time after the thick disk We thank Jeremy Mould for providing a preprint of his study on extragalactic thick disks. CB and HM are supported by the Canada Research Chair program and NSERC. BKG and DK acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council through its Discovery Project program. References [1] J. J. Dalcanton & R. A. Bernstein, 2002 AJ, 124, 1348 [2] C. B. Brook, D. Kawata, B. K. Gibson, & K. C. Freeman 2004b, ApJ, 612, 894 [3] J. Mould 2005, AJ, 129, 698 [4] V. P. Reshetnikov, R.-J. Dettmar, & F. Combes 2003, A&A, 399, 879 [5] C. B. Brook, B. K. Gibson, H. Martel, & D. Kawata 2005a, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0503273 [6] C. B. Brook, D. Kawata, H. Martel, & B. K. Gibson 2005b, in preparation [7] D. Kawata & B. K. Gibson 2003, MNRAS, 340, 908 [8] C. B. Brook, D. Kawata, B. K. Gibson, & C. Flynn 2004a, MNRAS, 349, 12 [9] A. C. Quillen & D. Garnett 2001, in Galaxy Disks and Disk Galaxies, ASP Conference Series 203, eds. G. Jose, S. J. Funes, & E. M. Corsini (San Francisco: PASP), p. 87 [10] B. Edvardsson, J. Anderson, B. Gustafsson, D. L. Lambert, P. E. Nissen, & J. Tomkin 1993, A&A, 275, 101 [11] B. Nordström et al. 2004, A&A, 418, 989 [12] Efstathiou, G., Davis, M., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1985, ApJS, 57, 241 [13] Martel, H. 1991, ApJ, 366, 353 5