K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions

Similar documents
Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Parametric Study of Beam Slab Raft Foundation

Supplementary Problems for Chapter 7

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Assignment 1 - actions

Plastic design of continuous beams

Clayey sand (SC)

Support Reactions: a + M C = 0; 800(10) F DE(4) F DE(2) = 0. F DE = 2000 lb. + c F y = 0; (2000) - C y = 0 C y = 400 lb

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

Examples to verify and illustrate ELPLA

Liquefaction and Foundations

Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement

Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils. C L o r O L C H o r O H

Civil Engineering 16/05/2008

T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Comparative Study of Strengths of Two-Way Rectangular Continuous Slabs with Two Openings Parallel to Long Side and Short Side

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

PASSIVE COOLING DESIGN FEATURE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENT IN PERI AUDITORIUM

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

From Table 1 4. DL = [12 lb/ft 2 # in.(6 in.)] (15 ft)(10 ft) = 10,800 lb. LL = (250 lb/ft 2 )(15 ft)(10 ft) = 37,500 lb.

ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH

Bending and Shear in Beams

RAFT FOUNDATION DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH BS8110:PART _FOR MULTISTOREY BUILDING (BS8110 : PART 1 : 1997)

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES AGAINST TSUNAMI FORCES UNDER DIFFERENT SOIL CONDITIONS

Compute the lateral force per linear foot with sloping backfill and inclined wall. Use Equation No. 51, page 93. Press ENTER.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

UNIT II 1. Sketch qualitatively the influence line for shear at D for the beam [M/J-15]

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Seabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis

Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs

spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

SIGN CONVENTION OF STRESS RESULTANTS

SETTLEMENT EVALUATION OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION SUBJECTED TO VERTICAL LOAD ON THE MULTI-LAYER SOIL

9.13 Fixed Earth-Support Method for Penetration into Sandy Soil

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Jose Brito, Cenor, Portugal

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)

DETERMINATION OF EI FOR PULTRUDED GFRP SHEET PILE PANELS. Abstract

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica.

Talić Z. et al: Geotechnical characteristics... Archives for Technical Sciences 2014, 11(1), 33-39

Software Verification

YOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)

JCSS Workshop on Semiprobabilistic FEM Calculations, Delft, 1&2 December 2009

Nonlinear pushover analysis for pile foundations

PILE-SUPPORTED RAFT FOUNDATION SYSTEM

Copyright. magazine. bearing capacity and modulus of subgrade reaction? Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (Ks)

Subsurface Stresses (Stresses in soils)

Chapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

NUMERICAL VERIFICATION OF GEOTECHNICAL STRUCTURE IN UNFAVOURABLE GEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS CASE STUDY

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Analysis of a single pile settlement

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA

ADVANCES in NATURAL and APPLIED SCIENCES

Chapter 4.1: Shear and Moment Diagram

Validation of the Advanced Calculation Model SAFIR Through DIN EN Procedure

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Calculation and analysis of internal force of piles excavation supporting. based on differential equation. Wei Wang

- Beams are structural member supporting lateral loadings, i.e., these applied perpendicular to the axes.

Reinforced concrete structures II. 4.5 Column Design

Comparison between Different Shapes of Structure by Response Spectrum Method of Dynamic Analysis

CPT: Geopractica Contracting (Pty) Ltd Total depth: m, Date:

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Mechanical Behaviors of Cylindrical Retaining Structures in Ultra-deep Excavation

4 Initial Sizing of members

National Exams May 2015

8 Deflectionmax. = 5WL 3 384EI

Correlations between soil parameters and penetration testing results

Software Verification

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

EXTENDED ABSTRACT. Combined Pile Raft Foundation

8-5 Conjugate-Beam method. 8-5 Conjugate-Beam method. 8-5 Conjugate-Beam method. 8-5 Conjugate-Beam method

Theory of Shear Strength

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Theory of Shear Strength

Transcription:

K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions The reader is advised to read the text in Chapter 13 before using these charts. The charts and figures are repeated here for quick reference and the following is an aide-mémoire for the experienced user of the procedure. (1) Select the required design span of the depression based on the engineer s experience and using Table K.1 and/or Fig. K.1 as a guide. (2) If there is no bottom reinforcement in the slab, use the chart on the right of Fig. K.1 to select the minimum effective depth required. (3) For each loading type on the area under consideration, calculate the total factored load on the design span from Table K.2 and multiply each by the appropriate moment factor K m which is also obtained from Table K.2. (4) Sum the results from (3) above to give (T u K m ) and use Fig. K.2 for slabs with top reinforcement only and Fig. K.3 for slabs with top and bottom reinforcement to determine the area of reinforcement required for the selected effective depth. Note that the area of reinforcement is required in both directions (i.e. a square mesh is needed). (5) If heavy point or line loads are present, a shear capacity check should also be undertaken. (6) A similar design process is adopted for designing raft beams, using Table K.3 and Figs K.4 and K.5.

35 Appendices slabs with top reinforcement only 4. 4. minimum allowable effective depth (mm) 225 assumed diameter of depression (m) 3. 2. soil classification D C B A 3. 2. design span of depression L (m) 2 175 15 125 1 75.5 depth of hardcore/compacted material h fill (m) Fig. K.1 Design span for local depression. For soil classifications see below. Table K.1 Design diameter for local depression Soil classification A Consistent firm sub-soil B Consistent soil type but variable density, i.e. loose to firm C Variable soil type but firm D Variable soil type and variable density Soil type One only of: clay, sand, gravel, sandy clay, clayey sand One only of: clay, sand, gravel, sandy clay, clayey sand Two or more of: clay, sand, gravel, sandy clay, clayey sand Two or more of: clay, sand, gravel, sandy clay, clayey sand Assumed diameter of depression (m) 1.5 1.5 2. 2. 2.5 2.5 3.5

Appendices 351 Table K.2 Load types and moment factors for raft slabs spanning over a depression of diameter L Top reinforcement only Top and bottom reinforcement K m T1 TB1 Uniformly distributed load f S (kn/m 2 ) F S = f S (πl 2 /4) F S = f S (πl 2 /4) T2 TB2 Parallel line 1.5 T3 TB3 Lateral line 1.5 T4 TB4 2 way line 1.5 P = 2PL P = 2PL T5 TB5 Point load P (kn) 2.

352 Appendices 5 d = 225 d = 2 45 d = 175 4 35 d = 15 3 d = 125 (K m T u ) 25 d = 1 2 15 d = 75 1 5 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 CONCRETE GRADE 35 REINFORCEMENT GRADE 46 AREA OF REINFORCEMENT EACH WAY = A S (mm 2 /m) Fig. K.2 Design chart for slabs with top reinforcement only.

Appendices 353 1 d = 225 d = 2 9 d = 175 8 7 d = 15 6 d = 125 (K m T u ) 5 d = 1 4 d = 75 3 2 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 CONCRETE GRADE 35 REINFORCEMENT GRADE 46 AREA OF REINFORCEMENT EACH WAY PER FACE = A S (mm 2 /m) Fig. K.3 Design chart for slabs with top and bottom reinforcement.

354 Appendices Table K.3 Load types and moment factors for raft beams Internal beam Edge beam Corner beam K m I1 E1 C1 Uniformly distributed load f S (kn/m 2 ) L 2.5 F S = f S (πl 2 /4) F S = f S (πl 2 /8) F S = f S (.64L 2 ) I2 E2 C2 Parallel line / 2 I3 E3 C3 Lateral line /2 / 2 I4 E4 C4 2 way line L 2 P = 2PL P = 3PL /2 P = 2PL / 2 I5 E5 C5 Point load P (kn) 2.

Appendices 355 5 45 (K m T u ) L/b (kn) 4 35 3 25 2 d = 55 d = 5 d = 45 d = 4 d = 35 d = 3 15 1 5 4 8 12 16 2 AREA OF REINFORCEMENT PER FACE/m WIDTH = A s /b (mm 2 /m) CONCRETE GRADE 35 REINFORCEMENT GRADE 46 Fig. K.4 Design chart for internal and edge beams.

356 Appendices (K m T u )L/b (kn) 25 225 2 175 15 125 1 d = 55 d = 5 d = 45 d = 4 d = 35 d = 3 75 5 25 4 8 12 16 2 AREA OF REINFORCEMENT IN TOP FACE/m WIDTH = A s /b (mm 2 /m) CONCRETE GRADE 35 REINFORCEMENT GRADE 46 Fig. K.5 Design chart for corner beams.