Response of morning auroras and cosmic noise absorption to the negative solar wind pressure pulse: A case study

Similar documents
On the motion of dayside auroras caused by a solar wind pressure pulse

Auroral Disturbances During the January 10, 1997 Magnetic Storm

Estimating the peak auroral emission altitude from all-sky images

Ionospheric Tomography II: Ionospheric Tomography II: Applications to space weather and the high-latitude ionosphere

Small-Scale Structure of Ionospheric Absorption of Cosmic Noise During Pre-Onset and Sharp Onset Phases of an Auroral Absorption Substorm

STUDY ON RELATIONSHIP OF MAGNETOSPHERIC SUBSTORM AND MAGNETIC STORM

MAGNETIC STORM EFFECTS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRIC FIELD VARIATIONS

Scaling of electric field fluctuations associated with the aurora during northward IMF

Chapter 8 Geospace 1

Response of the Earth s magnetosphere and ionosphere to the small-scale magnetic flux rope in solar wind by the MHD simulation

Temporal evolution of the transpolar potential after a sharp enhancement in solar wind dynamic pressure

Geosynchronous magnetic field response to solar wind dynamic pressure pulse

Relation of substorm disturbances triggered by abrupt solar-wind changes to physics of plasma sheet transport

Planned talk schedule. Substorm models. Reading: Chapter 9 - SW-Magnetospheric Coupling from Russell book (posted)

Geomagnetic Disturbance Report Reeve Observatory

The Solar wind - magnetosphere - ionosphere interaction

Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm

Relationship of Oscillating Aurora to Substorms and Magnetic Field Line Resonances

Convection dynamics and driving mechanism of a small substorm during dominantly IMF By+, Bz+ conditions

CHAPTER 2 DATA. 2.1 Data Used

Study of Geomagnetic Field Variations at Low Latitude of African Equatorial Region

Andrew Keen, Inari, Finland 18 Feb º C spaceweather.com

High latitude magnetospheric topology and magnetospheric substorm

COMPARISON OF PC5 GEOMAGNETIC PULSATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH CIR-DRIVEN AND CME-DRIVEN STORMS. O. V. Kozyreva and N.G. Kleimenova

Modeling magnetospheric current response to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements during magnetic storms: 2. Application to different storm phases

Two types of geomagnetic storms and relationship between Dst and AE indexes

Evidence for subauroral proton flashes on the dayside as the result of the ion cyclotron interaction

High-latitude Daytime Magnetic Bays as Effects of Strong Positive IMF Bz: Case study

Global-scale electron precipitation features seen in UV and X rays during substorms

Study of Solar Proton Event Observed using Riometers

Solar-Wind/Magnetosphere Coupling

Global morphology of substorm growth phases observed by the IMAGE-SI12 imager

Changes of dayside auroral distribution caused by a solar wind pressure pulse and associated interplanetary magnetic field disturbances

PC index as a standard of magnetospheric disturbances in the auroral zone

MAIN (MULTISCALE AURORA IMAGING NETWORK) AURORAL CAMERAS: OVERVIEW OF EVENTS OBSERVED DURING LAST WINTER SEASONS. Boris V. Kozelov

DYNAMICS OF THE EARTH S MAGNETOSPHERE

Polar cap bifurcation during steady-state northward interplanetary magnetic field with j B Y j B Z

РС INDEX AS INDICATOR OF THE SOLAR WIND ENERGY ENTERED INTO THE MAGNETOSPHERE: RELATION TO INTERPLANETARY ELECTRIC FIELD AND MAGNETIC DISTURBANCES

Estimation of Storm-Time Level of Day-Side Wave Geomagnetic Activity Using a New ULF Index

Detailed analysis of a substorm event on 6 and 7 June 1989: 2. Stepwise auroral bulge evolution during expansion phase

Identification of optical auroras caused by mantle precipitation with the aid of particle observations from DMSP satellites

Observing SAIDs with the Wallops Radar

David versus Goliath 1

Electromagnetic Fields Inside the Magnetoshpere. Outline

Luminosity variations in several parallel auroral arcs before auroral breakup

ESS 200C Aurorae. Lecture 15

A substorm in midnight auroral precipitation

Jim Wild Lancaster University

The Dynamic Magnetosphere. Ioannis A. Daglis. National Observatory of Athens, Greece

Open magnetic flux and magnetic flux closure during sawtooth events

Monitoring the dayside and nightside reconnection rates during various auroral events using IMAGE- FUV and SuperDARN data

Role of IMF B x in the solar wind magnetosphere ionosphere coupling

Simultaneous ground-satellite optical observations of postnoon shock aurora in the Southern Hemisphere

Introduction to the Sun-Earth system Steve Milan

Substorms: Externally Driven Transition to Unstable State a few Minutes Before Onset

Tracking Solar Eruptions to Their Impact on Earth Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA September 2016 Bonus

Solar and Interplanetary Disturbances causing Moderate Geomagnetic Storms

FEATURES OF HIGH LATITUDE MAGNETOSPHERIC TOPOLOGY AND MAGNETOSPHERIC SUBSTORM

Numerical Simulation of Jovian and Kronian Magnetospheric Configuration

Impact of interplanetary shock on the ULF wave activity: A case study of the storm sudden commencement on September 22, 1999

A Note on A-C Effects on MHD Dynamo in the Earth's Low-Latitude Magnetospheric Boundary Layer. Senkichi SHIBUYA

Multistage substorm expansion: Auroral dynamics in relation to plasma sheet particle injection, precipitation, and plasma convection

NICT SPACE WEATHER ACTIVITIES

Substorm onsets as observed by IMAGE-FUV

How is Earth s Radiation Belt Variability Controlled by Solar Wind Changes

Interplanetary magnetic field B x asymmetry effect on auroral brightness

1 Introduction. Cambridge University Press Physics of Space Plasma Activity Karl Schindler Excerpt More information

Magnetic Reconnection

FAST Observations of Ion Outflow Associated with Magnetic Storms

Adventures Under the Northern Lights

Magnetic field of the transition current system: dawn-dusk asymmetry

Space Physics. An Introduction to Plasmas and Particles in the Heliosphere and Magnetospheres. May-Britt Kallenrode. Springer

Near-Earth Breakup in Substorms: Empirical and Model Constraints

Uppsala universitet Institutionen för astronomi och rymdfysik Anders Eriksson

Features of Pc5 Pulsations in the Geomagnetic Field, Auroral Luminosity, and Riometer Absorption

Conjugate observations of traveling convection vortices: The field-aligned current system

AURORAL ELECTROJETS AND 3D CURRENTS IN THE IONOSPHERE-MAGNETOSPHERE SYSTEM

Planetary Magnetospheres

cos 6 λ m sin 2 λ m Mirror Point latitude Equatorial Pitch Angle Figure 5.1: Mirror point latitude as function of equatorial pitch angle.

The CARISMA Array of Fluxgate and Induction Coil Magnetometers

Global Observations of Earth s Ionosphere/Thermosphere. John Sigwarth NASA/GSFC Geoff Crowley SWRI

The IMF impact on the ULF oscillations in the magnetospheric polar cusps

An overview on PRIC s UAP observations in the polar regions. Hongqiao Hu & UAP Group Polar Research Institute of China

Effect of solar wind pressure enhancements on storm time ring current asymmetry

A Correlation Study of Steady Magnetospheric Convection in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres

Different response of dayside auroras to increases in solar wind dynamic pressure

Geomagnetic response to solar wind dynamic pressure impulse events at high-latitude conjugate points

Global modeling of the magnetosphere in terms of paraboloid model of magnetospheric magnetic field

Space Weather Effects of Coronal Mass Ejection

Simultaneous observations of ionospheric flow and tail reconnection signatures during the substorm expansion phase.

Magnetospheric Currents at Quiet Times

High-latitude aurora during steady northward interplanetary magnetic field and changing IMF B y

Geomagnetic storms. Measurement and forecasting

Low energy electron radiation environment for extreme events

MSSL. Magnetotail Science with Double Star and Cluster

EFFECT OF SOLAR AND INTERPLANETARY DISTURBANCES ON SPACE WEATHER

12. Low Latitude A.urorae on October 21, I

Time history effects at the magnetopause: Hysteresis in power input and its implications to substorm processes

Auroral streamers and magnetic flux closure.

High-latitude Bow Shock: Tilt Angle Effects

Transcription:

ÓPTICA PURA Y APLICADA. www.sedoptica.es Sección Especial: 37 th AMASON / Special Section: 37 th AMASON Aurora Response of morning auroras and cosmic noise absorption to the negative solar wind pressure pulse: A case study ABSTRACT: V. B. Belakhovsky (*), V. V. Safargaleev, O. I. Yagodkina Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Russia. (*) Email: belakhov@mail.ru Recibido / Received: 30/01/2011. Aceptado / Accepted: 30/08/2011. A case study of response of particle precipitation to negative impulse of solar wind dynamic pressure is presented. The study was performed using the data of PGI all-sky camera at Barentsburg observatory (arch. Spitsbergen) and imaging riometer IRIS located in Northern Finland. Two stages of the response were found. At first, the reduction of cosmic noise absorption (CNA) in the center of the auroral zone and the decay of the auroras near the pole boundary of the auroral oval were observed. The second stage was started in 10 minutes and characterized by the appearance of new bright forms near the pole boundary of the auroral oval. No significant changes in the CNA were observed at this time. We connect such reaction of the auroras and CNA during the first stage with propagation of the front of MHD disturbance through the source of precipitating particles in the magnetosphere. We explain the changes in the aurora dynamics at the second stage by the largescale reconfiguration of the magnetosphere which was manifested in the ionosphere as a change of position of dawn vortex of ionosphere convection in the region of the optical observations. Keywords: Solar Wind, Magnetosphere, Ionosphere, Sudden Impulse (SI), Aurora, Cosmic Noise Absorption (CNA). REFERENCIAS Y ENLACES / REFERENCES AND LINKS [1]. V. G. Vorobjev, SC-associated effects in auroras, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 14, 90-92 (1974). [2]. A. Ranta, H. Ranta, Storm sudden commencement observed in ionospheric absorption, Planet. Space Sci. 38, 365 372 (1990). [3]. F. V. Coroniti, F. Kennel, Electron precipitation pulsations, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 279-285 (1970). [4]. N. Sato, Y. Murata, H. Yamagishi, A. S. Yukimatu, M. Kikuchi, M. Watanabe, K. Makita, H. Yang, R. Liu, F. J. Rich, Enhancement of optical aurora triggered by the solar wind negative pressure impulse (SI-), Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 127-130 (2001). [5]. K. Liou, P. T. Newell, T. Sotirelis, C.-I. Meng, Global auroral response to negative pressure impulses, Geophys. Res Lett. 33, L11103 (2006). [6]. A. Kozlovsky, V. Safargaleev, N. Ostgaard, T. Turunen, A. Koustov, J. Jussila, A. Roldugin, On the motion of dayside auroras caused by a solar wind pressure pulse, Ann. Geophys. 23, 509 521 (2005). [7]. V. G. Vorobjev, V. B. Belakhovsky, O. I. Yagodkina, V. K. Roldugin, M. R. Hairston, Features of morningtime auroras during SC, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 48, 154-164 (2008). 1. Introduction Sudden increase of the solar wind dynamic pressure (sudden impulse, SI+) is accompanied by the aurora brightening and by the enhancement of the cosmic noise absorption (CNA) [1,2]. Both effects may be explained in the frame of one model scattering of the electrons to the loss cone due to growth of the electroncyclotron instability [3]. The response of the precipitations to sudden decrease of the solar wind dynamic pressure (SI-) is less investigated question. In the paper [4] with using all-sky TV camera data it was shown that the brightness of the discrete arcs increases and aurora begin to move poleward. Otherwise, in the paper [5] it Opt. Pura Apl. 44 (4) 611-615 (2011) - 611 - Sociedad Española de Óptica

was inferred from the POLAR images the decrease of the aurora intensity after SI. In present work the response of the aurora and CNA to the negative SI is examined. 2. Instrumentation The IMAGE, INTERMAGNET magnetometer networks data with 1-min resolution were used in this study for the observation of the geomagnetic field variations. For the observation of the aurora the all-sky camera data of Polar Geophysical Institute at Barentsburg (Spitsbergen) were used. Imaging multi-beam riometer IRIS (Kilpisjarvi) were used for the control of energetic particle precipitation. LANL geostationary spacecrafts data were used for the measurements of particle fluxes in the magnetosphere. SuperDARN radar in Hanksalmi used to determine ionosphere convection and spectral width of the reflected signal. The ACE, WIND and GEOTAIL spacecrafts measured the parameters of the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). 3. Results Figure 1 (upper panel) shows the parameters of interplanetary medium and variation of H- component of the magnetic field at low latitude station KAK. The decrease of solar wind dynamic pressure was detected by WIND satellite at 03.10 UT. Using the data of three satellites (ACE, WIND and GEOTAIL) we inferred that the irregularity impacts the magnetopause from the evening side. Sketch in Fig.1 (bottom panel) shows that front of magnetospheric disturbance passed the presumable location of the sources of precipitating particles in KIL and BAB (i.e. equatorial parts of KIL and BAB magnetic flux tubes) almost at the same time. This assumption was further used for timing the moment of optical response to SI- in Barentsburg. On Fig. 2. CNA on IRIS riometer at KIL and H- component of the magnetic field at TRO station are shown. The TRO station located in the field of view of IRIS riometer. At 03.21 UT the decrease of the CNA at IRIS was observed. The negative SI do not clearly seen in geomagnetic field variations at TRO station and other stations of IMAGE profile located in the auroral zone. Images in Fig. 3. (upper panel) demonstrate auroral activity before and after T 0 =03.20 UT. The intensity of two arcs located southern to the zenith decreased. We associate this with of the reduction of particle precipitation to the ionosphere. 10 minutes late, new aurora arcs appeared (Fig. 3, lower panel). The arcs came from the lower latitudes. Arc shift may be connected with the expansion of the dayside magnitosphere in sun direction caused by the decrease of the solar wind dynamic pressure. Connection of aurora dynamics with the largescale reconfiguration of the magnetosphere may be confirmed by behavior of the ionosphere convection in Fig. 4 (left panel) showing the expansion of morning vortex move toward the noon. Right panel shows the poleward displacement of the reflection boundary after 03.30 UT that also confirms our assumption concerning the magnetosphere expansion. 4. Discussion We pick out two stages of the aurora and CNA response to the abrupt decrease of the solar wind dynamic pressure. During the first stage the decrease of the CNA in the center of auroral zone was observed and auroral arcs near the polar cap boundary disappeared. During the second stage the aurora activity increased there due to drift of the aurora from the lower latitudes. We suppose that the decrease of the precipitation is caused by the propagation of decompression wave through the source of particle precipitation which located in the equatorial part of field line. In accordance with [1], the compression wave generated during positive SI leads to the increase of plasma anisotropy, development of the electroncyclotron instability and scattering of the particles to the lose cone. During the negative SI the reverse scheme may be realized. The decompression wave leads to the decrease of the plasma anisotropy coefficient, breaking of the electron-cyclotron instability and stopping of the particle scattering. Opt. Pura Apl. 44 (4) 611-615 (2011) - 612 - Sociedad Española de Óptica

ÓPTICA PURA Y APLICADA. www.sedoptica.es Fig. 1: Parameters of interplanetary medium (solar wind dynamic pressure, velocity, module of IMF, Bz, By-components of IMF) from the WIND spacecraft data, H-component of geomagnetic field at low-latitude station KAK (up). Orientation of the front disturbance in XY plane in GSE coordinate system (down). Opt. Pura Apl. 44 (4) 611-615 (2011) - 613 - Sociedad Española de Óptica

Fig. 2: Cosmic noise absorption on riometer IRIS in KIL (upper panel), magnetic field at TRO station (lower panel). Fig. 3: Frames of the all-sky camera at Batesburg during the first stage (upper panel), during the second stage (lower panel). Opt. Pura Apl. 44 (4) 611-615 (2011) - 614 - Sociedad Española de Óptica

Fig. 4: Ionosphere convection from the SuperDARN radar data (left), spectral width of the reflected signal from the SuperDARN radar data (right). 5. Conclusions In this work were shown that the response of the aurora to the negative impulse of the solar wind dynamic pressure may have two studies. During the first stage the decrease of the intensity of the aurora and CNA were observed. During the second stage (ten minutes after first stage) the increase of the intensity of aurora were observed due large-scale reconfiguration of the dayside magnetosphere. Earlier two stage response of the aurora to the positive SI was reported in the papers [6,7]. Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to the colleagues from the IRIS, IMAGE, SuperDARN, CUTLASS projects for the opportunity to use the data, to Vorobjev V.G. for the interest to the work. The work was supported by the RFFI 09-05-00818, Presidium of the Russian Academy of Science (Program 4), grant of Nordic Council of Ministers (Nordauropt). Opt. Pura Apl. 44 (4) 611-615 (2011) - 615 - Sociedad Española de Óptica