FRIEDMAN FAMILY VISITING PROFESIONALS PROGRAM

Similar documents
ANNUAL REPORT

Cascadia megathrust earthquakes: reducing risk through science, engineering, and planning

Life after Cal: Adapting to Change and Enjoying your Time in Graduate School

By Chris Mikes and David Fleck Digital Terrain Analysis GEOG 593. Overview

Magnitude 7.1 PERU. There are early reports of homes and roads collapsed leaving one dead and several dozen injured.

WESTERN STATES SEISMIC POLICY COUNCIL POLICY RECOMMENDATION Earthquake and Tsunami Planning Scenarios

EFFECTS OF SIMULATED MAGNITUDE 9 EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS ON STRUCTURES IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

Magnitude 7.2 OAXACA, MEXICO

Overview. Tools of the Trade. USGS Decision-Making Tools for Pre-Earthquake Mitigation and Post-Earthquake Response

Interpretive Map Series 24

BALLOT FOR ELECTION OF OFFICERS AEG OREGON SECTION

Building earthquake early warning for the west coast. Ken Creager Professor of Earth and Space Sciences University of Washington

Magnitude 6.5 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Interpretive Map Series 24

Important Concepts. Earthquake hazards can be categorized as:

Preparing for the BIG one Cascadia Subduction Zone Event

Cascadia EarthScope Earthquake and Tsunami Education Program (CEETEP)

Marine Studies Initiative Building Site Selection TAB U

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

Surviving the Big One: Understanding and Preparing for a Major Earthquake in Western Oregon

Meeting at a Glance May 2018

Magnitude 7.0 N of ANCHORAGE, ALASKA

APPLICATON OF SEAMLESS SIMULATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS AND HIGH RESOLUTION TSUNAMI SIMULATION TO COASTAL AREA OF SENDAI

Magnitude 7.9 SE of KODIAK, ALASKA

Mondo Quake in Pacific Northwest? By Leander Kahney

NESEC NEWS. Published by the Northeast States Emergency Consortium. Wakefield, Massachusetts

Chemical Safety as a Core ACS Value: Report on the 2018 Safety Summit

Magnitude 7.0 PERU. This region of the Andes is a sparsely populated area, there were no immediate reports of injuries or damage.

The Three Things You Need to Know About Tsunami Preparedness Patrick Corcoran, Oregon Sea Grant,

Magnitude 7.5 NEW BRITAIN REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA

How to communicate Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake hazards

EOSC350 Environmental, Geotechnical and Exploration Geophysics I

What makes southern California spin? A look at rotational tectonics along the San Andreas plate boundary

What is a tsunami? Capital Regional District Tsunami Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) Tsunami (soo-nah-mee)

RISK ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY PROFILE NATURAL HAZARDS COMMUNITY RISK PROFILES. Page 13 of 524

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

Earthquakes. Earthquake Magnitudes 10/1/2013. Environmental Geology Chapter 8 Earthquakes and Related Phenomena

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES. Duration of resource: 30 Minutes. Year of Production: Stock code: VEA Resource written by: Andrew Clarke BA Dip Tchg

Tsunami Sign Placement Guidelines

the IRIS Consortium Collaborative, Multi-user Facilities for Research and Education Briefing NSF Business Systems Review September 9, 2008

Economic and Social Council

Update on the It s Our Fault project

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

7.1 FIJI 1, :57:22 UTC

Wainui Beach Management Strategy (WBMS) Summary of Existing Documents. GNS Tsunami Reports

San Andreas Movie Can It Happen?

Magnitude 8.2 NORTHWEST OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Utah Liquefaction Advisory Group (ULAG)

Research Interests Vulnerability and sustainability indicators, flood hazards, uncertainty analysis, geospatial modeling

Cascadia Seismic Event Planning for the Maritime Community

Field Trip Overview Map

Establishment and Operation of a Regional Tsunami Warning Centre

Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated With Oil & Gas Development

NPTEL Video Course on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics. Resolutions

geographic patterns and processes are captured and represented using computer technologies

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA

ENGINEERING-SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF EARTHQUAKE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT ON THE EXAMPLE OF TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

2 Approaches To Developing Design Ground Motions

Transforming Chemistry Education through the Green Chemistry Commitment. Amy S. Cannon, Ph.D. Executive Director Beyond Benign

(energy loss is greater with longer wavelengths)

5. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

This article is provided courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History.

Geographic Information Systems(GIS)

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

High Definition Earthquake Modeling - How Technology is Changing our Understanding of Earthquake Risk

Location Option Details. 1. Florida

Magnitude 7.6 HONDURAS

IRIS Undergraduate Internship Orientation Week May 26 June 1, 2013 New Mexico Tech

An Introduction to PhD Study

1/29/2018 OPENING FOR SPRING 2018 HISTORICAL GEOLOGY 20 LEC M/W 8:00AM 9:0AM, RM 705. Camp in Yosemite National Park May 18, 19 and 20

What effect do they have?

Dangerous tsunami threat off U.S. West Coast

Earthquakes, an overview. Christa G. von Hillebrandt-Andrade Puerto Rico Seismic Network University of PR-Mayagüez

Magnitude 7.1 SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS

Preview Mode: ON Earthquake Risk in Stable, Intraplate Regions: the Case. of Perth, Australia. Historical Seismicity in the Perth Region

Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e Case History: Indonesian Tsunami Indonesian Tsunami (2) Introduction Historic Tsunamis

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 4: GPS strain analysis examples Student exercise

REPORT ON THE TOHOKU AREA PASIFIC OFFSHORE EARTHQUAKE

Scientific Research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone that Will Help Improve Seismic Hazard Maps, Building Codes, and Other Risk-Mitigation Measures

Earthquake Hazards in Douglas County

PRELIMINARY AGENDA. President IRIS Consortium Introduction of the Speaker Dr. Olga Cabello

"The Big One" by sea and not by land

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Magnitude 8.2 FIJI. A magnitude 8.2 earthquake occurred km (226.7 mi) E of Suva, Fiji at a depth of km (350 miles).

Application of Geospatial Technology in an Emergency Management Academic Program

Baldwin County, Alabama

2014 San Gabriel Valley Water Forum. October 2, 2014

Damping Scaling of Response Spectra for Shallow CCCCCCCCCrustalstallPaper Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Title Line Regions 1 e 2

Magnitude 7.5 NEW BRITAIN REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Haiti: Earthquake on January 12, 2010

DOWNLOAD OR READ : UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

crustal structure experiment beneath Wairarapa - Wellington area: results from SAHKE

Lecture Outline Wednesday-Monday April 18 23, 2018

Earthquake Hazards in Henderson

Transcription:

FRIEDMAN FAMILY VISITING PROFESIONALS PROGRAM Visit to Oregon State University: February 24, 2017 This report summarizes the visit of Ivan Wong from Lettis Consultants International that took place at Oregon State University on February 24, 2017, ITINERARY OR AGENDA Date/Time Event Friday, February 24 10:00 AM Arrive at Oregon State University *Park in CCE Reserved Spaces (located on south side of Kearney Hall); obtain parking pass to place on your dash from Tara Cooper in Kearney 111 Guest arrival and greeting 10 10:30 AM EERI President, Maggie Exton 10:30 11 AM Meeting with EERI Advisors 11 AM 11:30 AM Meeting with Ann Morey Ross, CEOAS 11:30 AM 11:45 AM Meeting with Andre Barbosa, Assistant Professor Structures 11:45 AM Noon Break Lunch Noon 1:30 PM Ben Mason, Assistant Professor Geotechnical EERI Leaders, Sharoo Shrestha and Shafiq Alam, and Abbas Abdollahi, Geotechnical PhD Student Visit to Oregon State University Student Chapter on February 24, 2017 page 1

Travel to O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Lab 1:30 1:40 PM Shafiq to escort Tour of O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Lab and Structures Lab 1:40 2:30 PM Pedro Lomonaco, Director O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory Sharoo Shrestha, EERI leader and Structures PhD student 2:30 2:40 PM Return the Kearney Hall Shafiq to escort 2:40 3:00 PM Break/Lecture Preparation 3 4:00 PM Lecture Predicting Earthquake Hazards and Developing Seismic Design Ground Motions in The Cascadia Subduction Zone: What We Know, Don t Know, and the Challenges Ahead 4 5:00 PM Meeting with Students 5:00 PM Depart STUDENT CHAPTER VISIT PLANNING COMMITTEE LEAD ORGANIZER(S): Maggie Exton, President, extonm@oregonstate.edu Sharoo Shrestha, Treasurer, shrestsh@oregonstate.edu Mohammad Shafiqual Alam, Secretary, alammo@oregonstate.edu Faculty advisors Ben Mason and Andre Barbosa also helped organize. Visit to Oregon State University Student Chapter on February 24, 2017 page 2

VISITING PROFESSIONAL LECTURE OVERVIEW The presentation on the prediction of Earthquake Hazards in the Cascadia Subduction Zone and the impending disaster from one of the principal seismologists was an opportune one as the Pacific North-West is preparing for the "Big- One". The lecture attendees were vastly diverse stakeholders such as engineers from various disciplines, homeowners, emergency planners, city planners and engineering students. Besides the presentation, graduate students had the opportunity to share their research and get invaluable advice from a professional with decades of experience on engineering seismology and seismic risk reduction. Attached are some pictures from the event and the subsequent sections discuss more about specific events. Ivan G. Wong presenting his Lecture Visit to Oregon State University Student Chapter on February 24, 2017 page 3

Audience at the Lecture Ivan G. Wong with EERI advisors and leaders Visit to Oregon State University Student Chapter on February 24, 2017 page 4

Lecture Abstract In only the past two to three decades has it become accepted that the Cascadia subduction zone is capable of generating giant earthquakes (moment magnitude [Mw] 8.5 and larger). Hence in this relatively short timeframe, the earthquake scientific and engineering communities have been playing catchup in terms of characterizing the hazards from such megaquakes and developing adequate seismic design criteria for ground shaking and tsunamis. The next Cascadia subduction zone megaquake will be the most severe natural hazard threat that the Pacific Northwest has ever seen. The Pacific Coast will be subjected to a devastating tsunami with wave heights in excess of 30 m in some locales and the areas from the coast inland up to 200 km will be hit by strong and sustained ground shaking. Two to three decades is a very short period of time to prepare the region for such formidable hazards and although significant progress has been made, there are significant holes in our knowledge and challenges in filling those holes. In this presentation, I will describe what we know and don t know in terms of the earthquake potential of the CSZ megathrust and its impacts, and how the available information is being used by the engineering community to not only develop seismic design criteria for new buildings, facilities, and structures but probably most challenging, assessing the seismic stability of our existing inventory. Professional Bio Principal Seismologist with Lettis Consultants International in Walnut Creek, California. Ivan has more than 40 years of experience in the fields of engineering seismology and seismic geology. A major focus in his career has been earthquake hazard reduction and awareness and public outreach. Ivan has directed the seismic hazard evaluations of more than 700 critical and important facilities worldwide, many for the Federal government. He has managed some of the largest seismic hazard evaluations performed in the U.S. including the Yucca Mountain Project. For FEMA, Ivan has been involved in the education and implementation of the seismic risk assessment software HAZUS in several areas in the U.S. He has been the recipient of numerous NEHRP external research grants from the USGS that have supported the development of urban probabilistic and scenario hazard maps and other earthquake hazard-related studies. Ivan is a past member of the EERI Board of Directors, past President of the EERI Northern California Chapter, past member of the Editorial Board for EERI s Earthquake Spectra, and currently serves as an Associate Editor for the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. He is a member of numerous scientific and engineering committees, panels, and working groups including Chair of the Working Group on Utah Earthquake Probabilities and a member of the CISN Advisory Panel, ANSS National Steering Committee, and the American Nuclear Society Working Groups on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Surface Fault Rupture and Deformation. Ivan has also been particularly active in serving the U.S. Geological Survey on several review and advisory panels including the review panel for the 1996 National Seismic Hazard Maps. Ivan has authored or coauthored more than 300 professional publications. SUPPLEMENTAL ACTIVITES Lunch with students and EERI faculty advisor Between 12:00 pm and 1:30 pm, Ivan was accompanied by one of the EERI faculty advisors, Dr. Ben Mason, two EERI leaders, Mohammad Shafiqual Alam and Sharoo Shrestha (both Structures PhD students) and a Geotechnical PhD student, Abbas Abdollahi for an informal lunch at McMenamins, Corvallis. Topics of discussion focused mostly on the current and past research works of Dr. Ben Mason and the students and Ivan s career as a seismologist and his experiences as an undergraduate student here at OSU. Ivan also talked about the desirable attributes an employer seeks on potential candidates during the recruitment process in the industry and stressed on the importance of networking to be successful in professional life. Visit to Oregon State University Student Chapter on February 24, 2017 page 5

O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory tour After the lunch, Ivan was escorted to O.H Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory at OSU by Shafiq and Sharoo. Ivan was given a tour around the wave lab by the director of wave lab, Dr. Pedro Lomonaco who explained much of the ongoing research and the available facilities, including a demonstration of the Large Wave Flume which is the largest of its kind in North America and the Directional Wave Basin, also known as the Tsunami Wave Basin. Sharoo then gave Ivan a brief tour of the major structures facilities in the same building, i.e. the horizontal and vertical load actuators, the strong floor, the strong wall, the temperature controlled chamber, etc., and explained about some of the major ongoing and past research works. Post-lecture student discussion Following the lecture, students had an opportunity to speak with Ivan about his lecture, his work, and their own work in the field of earthquake engineering/seismology. As reported by a Geotechnical Engineering PhD student, Ivan helped her to better understand correlations between earthquake magnitudes and displacements of faults, to identify an appropriate magnitude range for her fault problem, and provided important reference suggestions for her work. She has since implemented those ideas to her Finite Element Model of a tunnel crossing a fault. RESULTS, FEEDBACK AND LESSONS LEARNED Brief description of challenges during the process, general reception of the program and Visiting Professional. Also a description of other topics or disciplines the Student Chapter would like to cover in future visits, and related goals. One challenge during the process was organizing transportation around campus due to parking restrictions and availability of vehicles. Another challenge was determining a time for the lecture what is the time when most people can and will come? Another challenge arose with the fact that we at OSU-EERI did not appoint a lead organizer. This made it difficult to find out what had been done and what still necessary to accomplish. In the future, a shared document will be used so that everyone is aware of the task list and who is working on which task. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Oregon State University EERI Student Chapter gratefully acknowledges the support of the Friedman Family for sponsoring the travel of Ivan Wong through their Friedman Family Visiting Professional Program endowment. Additionally, OSU-EERI would like to thank the ASCE student chapter at OSU for providing refreshments for the lecture, and Tara Cooper for her help reserving rooms and providing the itinerary template. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Included at the end of this report are various attachments to supplement the information included above. A list of the attachments is included below: Item 1, Flier for event Visit to Oregon State University Student Chapter on February 24, 2017 page 6

College of Engineering School of Civil and Construction Engineering Predicting Earthquake Hazards and Developing Seismic Design Ground Motions in the Cascadia Subduction Zone: What We Know, Don't Know, and the Challenges Ahead Friedman Family Visiting Professional Lecture Ivan G. Wong Principal Seismologist Lettis Consultants International Walnut Creek, CA In only the past two to three decades has it become accepted that the Cascadia subduction zone is capable of generating giant earthquakes (moment magnitude [Mw] 8.5 and larger). Hence in this relatively short timeframe, the earthquake scientific and engineering communities have been playing catchup in terms of characterizing the hazards from such megaquakes and developing adequate seismic design criteria for ground shaking and tsunamis. The next Cascadia subduction zone megaquake will be the most severe natural hazard threat that the Pacific Northwest has ever seen. The Pacific Coast will be subjected to a devastating tsunami with wave heights in excess of 30 m in some locales and the areas from the coast inland up to 200 km will be hit by strong and sustained ground shaking. Two to three decades is a very short period of time to prepare the region for such formidable hazards and although significant progress has been made, there are significant holes in our knowledge and challenges in filling those holes. In this presentation, I will describe what we know and don t know in terms of the earthquake potential of the CSZ megathrust and its impacts, and how the available information is being used by the engineering community to not only develop seismic design criteria for new buildings, facilities, and structures but probably most challenging, assessing the seismic stability of our existing inventory. FRIDAY FEB. 24 3 P.M. Kearney 312 FREE Food and drinks will be provided. Ivan G. Wong is the principal seismologist with Lettis Consultants International in Walnut Creek, California. Ivan has more than 40 years of experience in the fields of engineering seismology and seismic geology. Ivan is a past member of the EERI Board of Directors, past President of the EERI Northern California Chapter, past member of the Editorial Board for EERI s Earthquake Spectra, and currently serves as an Associate Editor for the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. He is a member of numerous scientific and engineering committees, panels, and working groups including Chair of the Working Group on Utah Earthquake Probabilities and a member of the CISN Advisory Panel, ANSS National Steering Committee, and the American Nuclear Society Working Groups on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Surface Fault Rupture and Deformation. He is a member of numerous scientific and engineering committees, panels, and working