SOILS/AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN REVIEW

Similar documents
CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE

Basic Aggregates Study Guide

P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS. Jerry Vandevelde, P.E.

DESIGN OF ULTRA-THIN BONDED HOT MIX WEARING COURSE (UTBHMWC) MIXTURES

Volumetric Tests. Overview

Mar 1, 2018 LAB MANUAL INDEX 1. Table of Contents Laboratory Testing Methods Reducing Aggregate Field Samples to Testing Size (Ver.

Asphalt Mix Designer. Module 2 Physical Properties of Aggregate. Specification Year: July Release 4, July

SOIL MECHANICS-01 LAB COPY INSTRUCTER: ENGR HALLEMA ATAULLAH PREPARED BY: KAMRAN KHAN PRACTICLE NO. 01 TITLE: TO DETERMINE THE MOISRURE CONTENT OF A

Tikrit University. College of Engineering Civil engineering Department SOIL PROPERTES. Soil Mechanics. 3 rd Class Lecture notes Up Copyrights 2016

WACEL AGGREGATE LABORATORY TESTING TECHNICIAN

Chapter 2. The Ideal Aggregate. Aggregates

Chapter 1 - Soil Mechanics Review Part A

EVALUATION OF NEW TEST PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING THE BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF FINE AGGREGATE USING AUTOMATED METHODS


CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

Engineering materials

METHOD OF TEST FOR RELATIVE DENSITY AND ABSORPTION OF FINE AGGREGATE

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

CHAPTER 5 ESTABLISHING THEORETICAL / TARGET VALUES FOR DENSITY & MOISTURE CONTENT

Module 1 GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL AND OF REINFORCED SOIL (Lectures 1 to 4)

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1

Geology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.

Dr. L. I. N. de Silva. Student Name Registration Number: Assessed By: Lecturers Remarks

EXPERIMENT 3 DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATES

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOP FOR AASHTO T 85

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

SIEVE ANALYSIS. Introduction

CALCULATIONS FOR THE MARSHALL MIX DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

7. STREAMBED TEXTURE ANALYSIS

SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOP FOR AASHTO T 85

Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATE (Kansas Test Method KT-2)

Effects Of The Soil Properties On The Maximum Dry Density Obtained Fro

EXPERIMENT 2 SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 5.2. Permeability III (Das, Ch. 6) Summary Soil Index Properties (Das, Ch. 2-6)

Soil Mechanics III. SOIL COMPOSITION WEIGHT-VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

Chapter I Basic Characteristics of Soils

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 8. Elementary Soil Mechanics (West, Ch. 7)

Mid-Atlantic Region Technician Certification Program AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN MANUAL

Unbound Pavement Applications of Excess Foundry System Sands: Subbase/Base Material

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 709 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

This Specification is for the supply of sands, crushed rock and crushed scoria to Melbourne Water work sites.

The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations


CEEN Laboratory 4 Aggregates for Base Layers, Portland Cement Concrete & Hot Mix Asphalt

APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS

SOIL SURVEY STANDARD TEST METHOD PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS

Minneapolis Community and Technical College. Separation of Components of a Mixture

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 70 DENSITY AND VOLUMETRIC WATER CONTENT BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

CHAPTER: 4 PLASTICITY OF SOILS

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Cumulative weight retained

DISTRIBUTION OF EXPANSIVE SOILS

Soil Mechanics/Geotechnical Engineering I Prof. Dilip Kumar Baidya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1

It is important to recognize two distinct but overlapping uses of the term "clay":

This is start of the single grain view

12 th ICSGE Dec Cairo - Egypt

INTRODUCTION TO MEASUREMENTS

Asst. L.Musaab.S.A. ch.2 Soil Aggregate Basic Relationships (composition of soil terminology and definitions) 2.1Composition of soil

9 Sampling. Safety. Sample References. Size of Original Samples. Sample Types

Chesapeake Campus Chemistry 111 Laboratory

PREDICTIONS OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT FROM SIMPLE MATERIAL PROPERTIES

OHD L-14 METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINING THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND UNIT WEIGHT OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

2012 Road School Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD)

CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS Soil Sampling, Testing, & Classification Review

Geotechnical Properties of Soil

APPENDIX A TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Effect of Lime on the Compressibility Characteristics of a Highly Plastic Clay

Dry mix design. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Selection of aggregates 1

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

Appendix F Laboratory test results

GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

Reference method for the determination of real alcoholic strength by volume of spirit drinks of viti-vinicultural origin: measurement by pycnometry

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

SST3005 Fundamentals of Soil Science LAB 5 LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF SOIL TEXTURE: MECHANICAL ANALYSIS

Experiment Two Laboratory Balance: Mass Calculations

Journal of Asian Scientific Research

Chemistry Ch1&2 Test Chapter 1 Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Effect of Geometric Characteristics of Coarse Aggregates on Compaction Characteristics Of Soil-Aggregate Mixtures

Class Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530

Dr. Ravi Kant mittal. CE C361 Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engg. 1


Characterization of Sand Formation from a Crude Oilfield

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

2. RESPONSIBILITIES AND QUALIFICATIONS


SAND. By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST

Transcription:

(8:00 to 4:00) SOILS/GGREGTE TECHNICIN REVIEW Intro TTI Safety Rounding Procedure Thursday RIZ 201 SHTO T 11 RIZ 210 SHTO T 19 RIZ 211 SHTO T 255 RIZ 212 RIZ 233 RIZ 236 RIZ 225 RIZ 245 SHTO T 89 SHTO T 90 SHTO T 265 Sieving of Coarse and Fine Graded Soils & ggregates Materials Finer then No. 200 Sieve in Mineral ggregates by Washing Specific Gravity and bsorption of Coarse ggregate Unit Weight and Voids in ggregate Specific Gravity and bsorption of Fine ggregate Total Moisture Content of ggregate by Drying Percentage of Fractured Coarse ggregate Particles Flakiness of ggregates ph and Resistivity of Soils Lunch 12:00 1:00 Max. Dry Dens. nd Opt. Moisture of Soils Method Proctor Max. Dry Dens. nd Opt. Moisture of Soils Method D Proctor Liquid Limit of Soils Plastic Limit of Soils Lab Determination of Moisture Content of Soils Friday SHTO T 176 SHTO T 21 RIZ 105 SHTO R76 Hands On Practice Hands On Practice 1:00 4:00 Hand Out Practice Calculations Check Practice Calculations Plastic Fines in Graded ggregates and Soils by Sand Equivalent Test Organic Impurities in fine ggregates for Concrete Sampling Soils and ggregate Reducing Field Samples of ggregate to Testing Size Lunch 12:00 1:00 DOT Materials Testing Manual http://www.azdot.gov/business/engineering andconstruction/construction and materials/materials manuals

SOILS & GG TECHNICIN REVIEW TRINING Practice Calculations

PERCENT PSSING CLCULTION (RIZ 201) To calculate percent passing you will need a scientific calculator with at least one memory. lways add up all the weights, never change the amount in the total box. If the calculated total is 1.0% or less from the total in the total box, adjust the number of the sieve weight with the largest amount retained, except for the passing #4. CORSE SIEVE a. To get the Coarse sieve factor, divide 100 by the total weight of sample (the number in the total box). b. Place the factor in the memory of the calculator (MR+). c. Enter 100 in the calculator, subtract the first weight retained, times (x) the factor (memory recall) (MR),then the key this will give you the % passing that sieve. d: Keeping that number in the calculator subtract the next weight retained, multiply it by the factor (MR) until all % passing is calculated and recorded. e. Continue this down to the #4 weight retained. f. Then do a check on the pass #4 by, multiplying the weight passing the #4 times the factor (MR). FINE SIEVE lways add up all the weights, never change the amount in the total box. If the calculated total is 1.0% or less from the total in the total box, adjust the number of the sieve weight with the largest amount retained except, for the passing #200. a. Subtract the Total Dry Weight from the Dry Wt. of -#4 Split weight to get the elutriation weight and record it in the box provided. b. To get the fine sieve factor, take the % passing the #4 (whole number) and divide it by the adjusted split weight. c. Place the factor in the memory of the calculator. d. Enter the % pass the #4 (whole number) in the calculator, subtract the weight retained on the #8 sieve, multiply, (x) it by the factor (MR) to get the % passing the #8. e. Keeping that number in the calculator subtract the next weight retained (#10), multiply (x) it by the factor (MR) until all % passing is calculated and recorded. f. Continue this procedure down to the #200. g. Do a check on the pass #200 by multiplying the (weight passing the 200 sieve plus + the elutriation weight) by the factor (MR). When all the percent pass results are recorded, you may now record the percent retained for each sieve. Start with the largest % pass and subtract the next smaller % pass from it. Continue this down to the #200 sieve(rounded).

Practice Calculations 9 6 6 1 8 5 0 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 7 1 0 8 5 7 2 1 8 8 5 1 1 7 8 5 2 1 6 2 7 5 1 1 1 2 5 6 6 3 2 3 4 2 9 2 2 2 7 5 1 1 3 9 0

Specific Gravity and bsorption of Fine ggregate (RIZ 211) Bulk Sp. Gr. ( ) (O.D. basis) B S - C ( ) + ( ) - ( ) Where: mass of oven-dry sample in air, g. B mass of pycnometer filled with water, g. C mass of pycnometer with sample and water to calibration mark, g. S mass of saturated-surface-dry sample, g. 492.9 672.5 980.9 500.2 Bulk Sp. Gr. S ( ) (SSD basis) B S - C ( ) + ( ) - ( ) pparent Sp. Gr. B ( ) - C ( ) + ( ) - ( ) bsorption, percent S - x 100 ( ) - ( ) ( ) x 100 % Specific Gravity and bsorption of Coarse ggregate (RIZ 210) Bulk Sp. Gr. ( ) (O.D. basis) B - C ( ) - ( ) Where: mass of oven-dry sample in air, g. 3950 B mass of saturated-surface-dry sample in air, g. 4036 C mass of saturated sample in water, g. 2486 Bulk Sp. Gr. B ( ) (SSD basis) B - C ( ) - ( ) ( ) pparent Sp. Gr. - C ( ) - ( ) B bsorption, percent - x 100 ( ) - ( ) x 100 % ( ) Practice Calculations # 4

Flakiness Index (RIZ 233) Fractured Particles Sieve Size 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" 1/4" # 4 # 8 (RIZ 212) % Pass from Sieve nalysis t least one Fractured Face: % Ret. From Sieve nalysis (F) Wt. of test sample (Wa) 496 Weight of Test Sample 1515 1015 55 Wt. of fract. Particles(Wf) 444 Weigh Passing Slot 285 175 9 Fract. Particles (FF) x 100 % * Percent Passing Slot (P) t least two Fractured Face: Wf Wa NOTE: Only the size fractions which have 10 or more percent retained are tesed for passing the appropriate slot, and used to determine the Flakiness Index by the eequation below. * Percent Passing Slot (P) Weight Passing Slot Wt. of test sample (Wa) N x 100 Weight of Test Sample Wt. of fract. Particles(W2) N FLKINESS INDEX {F (11/2") X P (11/2")} + + + {F (No. 8 X P (No. 8)} Fract. Particles (FF2) W 2 x 100 N % {F (1-1/2") + + + {F (No. 8)} Wa FLKINESS INDEX ( x ) + ( x ) + ( x ) % ( ) + ( ) + ( ) Wet Weight - Dry Weight Moisture Content (T255, T265) Dry Weight ( 1058.9 ) - ( 1035.2 ) % x 100 x 100 ( 1035.2 ) Practice Calculations # 4

Sand Equivalent brasion Plasticity Index SHTO T176) SHTO T96) (SHTO T89 & 90) (RIZ 242 FOR M..F.C) Liquid Limit (LL) : Sand Reading 3.8 % brasion Bottle # 7 Tare Wt. of Bottle: 60.08 # Blows 25 Clay Reading 6.1 % Moisture Sand Equiv. Where: Original Mass (5000 ± 10 grams) (Wet Wt. With Bottle) - (Dry Wt. With Bottle) x 100 (Dry Wt. With Bottle - Tare Wt. of Bottle) Sand Reading 4.3 B Plus # 12 Material after brasion ( 75.85-72.85 ) x 100 % ( Clay Reading - ) 6.6 Sand Equiv. 100 Rev.: x 100 % Liquid Limit (For 25 Blows) 500 Rev.: x 100 % Plastic Limit (PL) : Sand Reading 4.1 Bottle # 21 Tare Wt. of Bottle: 55.69 Clay Reading 6.7 Sand Equiv. Type of brasion (Wet Wt. With Bottle) - (Dry Wt. With Bottle) x 100 (Dry Wt. With Bottle - Tare Wt. of Bottle) SandReading Clay Reading x 100 ( 63.21-62.25 ) x 100 % ( - ) verage Sand Equiv. Plastic Limit Plasticity Index (PI) : Soils Practice Calculations # 4 PI (LL - PL) ( ) - ( )

RIZON DEPRTMENT OF TRNSPORTTION CLIBRTION OF PROCTOR MOLD RIZ 225 ppendix Four Inch Mold Six Inch Mold Mold I. D. #: 2 Calibration Date: Calibration Expiration Date: Temperature of water used for Calibration: 78 F Unit Weight of Water: Test Operator: lb. /cu. ft. Supervisor and Date: Weight of Baseplate, Empty Mold, and Glass Plate (grams) Weight of Baseplate, Mold Filled with Water, and Glass Plate (grams) 4525.6 5465.2 Weight of Water to Fill Mold (grams) V Volume of Unit Weight Mold of Water (cu. ft.) (lb. / cu. ft. Weight of Water to FillMold (grams) X 453.6 (grams / lb.) V ( ) ( ) X ( 453.6 ) cu. ft. REMRKS: Practice Calulation # 4 Unit Weight of Water Table Temp F lbs/cu. Ft. Temp F lbs/cu. Ft. 68 62.315 77 62.243 69 62.308 78 62.234 70 62.301 79 62.225 71 62.293 80 62.216 72 62.285 81 62.206 73 62.277 82 62.196 74 62.269 83 62.186 75 62.261 84 62.176 76 62.252 85 62.166 86 62.155

rizona Department of Transportation METHOD or LTERNTE METHOD D PROCTOR DENSITY (rizona Test Method 225 or 245) Project No: Lab No : Rec d Date: 05/04/2011 Source and Type of Material : Proctor Method Used : Method or lternate Method D Test Operator and Date : Supervisor and Date: Weight of Mold M2 pprox % of water dded Wt. of Sample and Mold 2015 grams cu. ft. b M1 c WD ED Wet Wt. of Sample Wet Density lb/ cu ft Volume of Mold VM Est. Dry Density a VM x 453.6 Moisture Determination WW DW d e Wet Wt. of Moisture Sample Dry Wt. of Moisture Sample Wt. of Water Percent Moisture Dry Density lb/cu ft M1 - M2 c WD x 100 WW - DW d x 100 WD x 100 a b + 100 DW e + 100 6 4019 334.0 309.5 8 4129 473.6 427.7 10 4110 399.9 356.6 12 4058 387.7 339.9 DD METHOD WT WR4 PR4 WR4 x 100 WT LTERNTE METHOD D WT WR 3/4 PR 3/4 WR 3/4 x 100 % WT Coarse ggregate Bulk Oven Dry Specific Gravity : Coarse ggregate bsorption : Dry Density lb. / cu. ft. WT (Total Wt. from Gradation Card) WR4 Total Wt minus the (- #4 Weight) on sieve analysis PR4 % of + #4 material e ce t o stu e OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OM MXIMUM DRY DENSITY ( lb. / cu. ft. ) MD Remarks : StudyGuideCalculations Percent Moisture

Practice Calulations 4

RIZ 236 WORK CRD DETERMINING ph ND MINIMUM RESISTIVITY OF SOILS ND GGREGTES Lab Number: Practice Calulations # 4 Date: 10/27/2015 Project / TRCS #: Tested By: MINIMUM RESISTIVITY ph Range Setting Dial Reading 1,000 X 5.8 Resistance, Sample Water Ohms Weight: 50.1 g Weight: g 1,000 X 4.5 Start Time: 1,000 X 4.1 Stir 1,000 X 2.7 Stir 1,000 X 1.8 Stir 1,000 X 1.4 Stir 100 X 1.9 Stir 100 X 3.9 Stir X Stir 9:00 X X Stir End Time: Soil Box Factor 6.71 7.86 ph Reading ph Buffers used for calibration of ph meter: (Minimum Resistivity, hm-cm) (Resistance, hms) x (Soil Box Factor, cm) ( ) X ( ) hm-cm MINIMUM RESISTIVITY hm-cm

SOILS & GG TECHNICIN REVIEW TRINING Practice Calculations nswer Key

Practice Gradation Calculations CORSE FCTOR 0.004624 100 / 21627 0.004623850 Wt. Retained % RET. % PSS 3" Wt. RET. (Memory Recall) 2 1/2" 2" 100 100-966 (MR) x 0.004624 95.533361 1 1/2" 966 4 96 95.53336108-1850 x (MR) 86.979239 1" 1850 9 87 86.97923891-2133 x (MR) 77.116567 3/4" 2133 10 77 77.11656725-2202 x (MR) 66.934850 1/2" 2237 10 67 66.93484996-1085 x (MR) 61.917973 3/8" 1085 5 62 61.91797290-721 x (MR) 58.584177 1/4" 721 3 59 58.58417719-885 x (MR) 54.492070 # 4 885 5 - # 4 11785 54 -#4 Check 11785 x 0.004624 54.492070 Total 21627 2202 21662-35 DRY WT. OF- #4 SPLIT FINE FCTOR 511 0.105675 54 / 511 0.105675147 #8 125 14 40 54-128 55.000000 x 0.105675 40.473581 #10 66 7 33 40.47358121-66 x (MR) 33.499022 #16 32 3 30 33.49902153-32 x (MR) 30.117417 #30 34 3 27 30.11741683-34 x (MR) 26.524462 #40 29 4 23 26.52446184-29 x (MR) 23.459883 #50 22 2 21 23.45988258-22 x (MR) 21.135029 #100 27 3 18 21.13502935-27 x (MR) 18.281800 #200 51 5 - # 200 1 12.9 18.28180039-51 x (MR) 12.892368 Total 390 Elutriation 121 -# 200 Check 121 + 1 122 x (MR) 12.892368 128 387 3 (Elutriation + - # 200's)

Practice Calculations 004624.004623850 2202 21662 9 6 6 1 8 5 0 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 7 1 0 8 5 7 2 1 8 8 5 1 1 7 8 5 2 1 6 2 7 4 9 10 10 5 3 5 100 96 87 77 67 62 59 54 5 1 1 105675.105675147 128 387 1 2 5 14 40 6 6 7 33 3 2 3 30 3 4 3 27 2 9 4 23 2 2 2 21 2 7 3 18 5 1 5 1 12 9 3 9 0 1 2 1

Specific Gravity and bsorption of Fine ggregate (RIZ 211) 492.9 Bulk Sp. Gr. ( ) (O.D. basis) B S - C ( ) + ( ) - ( ) 191.8 Where: mass of oven-dry sample in air, g. 672.5 500.2 980.9 2.570 B mass of pycnometer filled with water, g. C mass of pycnometer with sample and water to calibration mark, g. S mass of saturated-surface-dry sample, g. 492.9 672.5 980.9 500.2 2.569864 500.2 Bulk Sp. Gr. S ( ) (SSD basis) B S - C ( 672.5 ) + ( 500.2 ) - ( 980.9 ) 191.8 2.608 2.607925 pparent Sp. Gr. bsorption, percent B S - - x C 100 492.9 ( ) ( ) + ( ) - ( ) 184.5 672.5 492.9 980.9 2.672 2.671545 ( 500.2 ) - ( 492.9 ) 7.3 x 100 ( 492.9 ) 1.48 % 1.4810306 Specific Gravity and bsorption of Coarse ggregate (RIZ 210) Bulk Sp. Gr. ( ) (O.D. basis) B - C ( ) - ( ) 1550 Where: mass of oven-dry sample in air, g. 3950 2.548387 B mass of saturated-surface-dry sample in air, g. 4036 C mass of saturated sample in water, g. 2486 Bulk Sp. Gr. B ( 4036 ) 2.604 (SSD basis) B - C ( 4036 ) - ( 2486 ) 1550 2.603871 3950 4036 2486 2.548 pparent Sp. Gr. - C ( 3950 ) 2.698 ( 3950 ) - ( 2486 ) 1464 2.698087 B bsorption, percent - x 100 ( 4036 ) - ( 3950 ) 86 2.18 % x 100 ( 3950 ) 2.1772152 Practice Calculations # 4 Key

Flakiness Index (RIZ 233) Fractured Particles Sieve Size 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" 1/4" # 4 # 8 (RIZ 212) % Pass from Sieve nalysis 77 67 40 t least one Fractured Face: % Ret. From Sieve nalysis (F) 10 10 14 Wt. of test sample (Wa) 496 Weight of Test Sample 1515 1015 55 Wt. of fract. Particles(Wf) 444 Weigh Passing Slot 285 175 9 Fract. Particles (FF) Wf x 100 90 % Wa * Percent Passing Slot (P) 19 17 16 t least two Fractured Face: 89.516129 * Percent Passing Slot (P) Weight Passing Slot Wt. of test sample (Wa) N x 100 Weight of Test Sample Wt. of fract. Particles(W2) N FLKINESS INDEX {F (11/2") X P (11/2")} + + + {F (No. 8 X P (No. 8)} Fract. Particles (FF2) W 2 x 100 N % {F (1-1/2") + + + {F (No. 8)} Wa NOTE: Only the size fractions which have 10 or more percent retained are tesed for passing the appropriate slot, and used to determine the Flakiness Index by the eequation below. FLKINESS INDEX ( 190 ) + ( 170 ) + ( 224 ) ( 10 x 19 ) + ( 10 x 17 ) + ( 14 x 16 ) 584 % 17.17647 ( 10 ) + ( 10 ) + ( 14 ) 34 17 Moisture Content (T255, T265) Wet Weight - Dry Weight Dry Weight x 100 2.3 ( 1058.9 ) - ( 1035.2 ) % x 100 ( 1035.2 ) 2.289413

Sand Equivalent brasion Plasticity Index SHTO T176) SHTO T96) (SHTO T89 & 90) (RIZ 242 FOR M..F.C) Liquid Limit (LL) : Sand Reading 3.8 % brasion Bottle # 7 Tare Wt. of Bottle: 60.08 # Blows 25 Clay Reading 6.1 % Moisture Sand Equiv. 63 Where: Original Mass (5000 ± 10 grams) 62.30 (Wet Wt. With Bottle) - (Dry Wt. With Bottle) (Dry Wt. With Bottle - Tare Wt. of Bottle) x 100 (3.0 / 12.8) X 100 23.49256069 Sand Reading 4.3 B Plus # 12 Material after brasion ( 75.85-72.85 ) 3.0 23 % x 100 ( Clay Reading 6.6 72.85-60.08 12.77 ) Sand Equiv. 66 100 Rev.: x 100 % Liquid Limit 23 (For 25 Blows) 65.15 500 Rev.: x 100 % Plastic Limit (PL) : Sand Reading 4.1 Bottle # 21 Tare Wt. of Bottle: 55.69 Clay Reading 6.7 Sand Equiv. 62 Type of brasion 61.19 (Wet Wt. With Bottle) - (Dry Wt. With Bottle) x 100 (Dry Wt. With Bottle - Tare Wt. of Bottle) SandReading Clay Reading x 100 verage Sand Equiv. 64 63.67 (0.96 / 6.56) X 100 14.63414634 ( 63.21-62.25 ) 0.96 15 % x 100 ( 62.25-55.69 ) 6.56 Plastic Limit 15 Plasticity Index (PI) : Soils Practice Calculations # 4 Key PI (LL - PL) ( 23 ) - ( 15 ) 8

RIZON DEPRTMENT OF TRNSPORTTION CLIBRTION OF PROCTOR MOLD RIZ 225 ppendix Four Inch Mold Six Inch Mold Mold I. D. #: 2 Calibration Date: Calibration Expiration Date: Temperature of water used for Calibration: Unit Weight of Water: Test Operator: 62.234 lb. /cu. ft. 78 F Supervisor and Date: Weight of Baseplate, Empty Mold, and Glass Plate (grams) Weight of Baseplate, Mold Filled with Water, and Glass Plate (grams) Weight of Water to Fill Mold (grams) 4525.6 5465.2 939.6 V Volume of Mold (cu. ft.) Weight of Water to FillMold (grams) Unit Weight of Water (lb. / cu. ft. X 453.6 (grams / lb.) V 939.6 0.0333 62.234 453.6 0.033284516 ( ) cu. ft. ( ) X ( ) REMRKS: Practice Calulation key Unit Weight of Water Table Temp F lbs/cu. Ft. Temp F lbs/cu. Ft. 68 62.315 77 62.243 69 62.308 78 62.234 70 62.301 79 62.225 71 62.293 80 62.216 72 62.285 81 62.206 73 62.277 82 62.196 74 62.269 83 62.186 75 62.261 84 62.176 76 62.252 85 62.166 86 62.155

rizona Department of Transportation METHOD or LTERNTE METHOD D PROCTOR DENSITY (rizona Test Method 225 or 245) Project No: Lab No : Rec d Date: 01/00/1900 Source and Type of Material : Proctor Method Used : Method or lternate Method D Test Operator and Date : Supervisor and Date: Weight of Mold M2 2015 grams Volume of Mold VM 0.0333 cu. ft. a VM x 453.6 15.1049 b M1 c WD ED Moisture Determination WW DW d e DD Wet Wt. pprox % Wt. of Wet Wt. Dry Wt. of Dry Wet Density Est. Dry of Wt. of Water Percent of water Sample of Moisture Density lb/ cu ft Density Moisture Moisture dded and Mold Sample Sample lb/cu ft Sample M1 - M2 c WD x 100 WW - DW d x 100 WD x 100 a b + 100 DW e + 100 6 4019 2004 132.7 125.2 334.0 309.5 24.5 7.9 123.0 8 4129 2114 140.0 129.6 473.6 427.7 45.9 10.7 126.5 10 4110 2095 138.7 126.1 399.9 356.6 43.3 12.1 123.7 12 4058 2043 135.3 120.8 387.7 339.9 47.8 14.1 118.6 WT 21627 WR4 9842 PR4 WR4 x 100 46% WT 45.50793% LTERNTE METHOD D WT WR 3/4 PR 3/4 WR 3/4 x 100 % WT Coarse ggregate Bulk Oven Dry Specific Gravity : Coarse ggregate bsorption : METHOD Dry Density lb. / cu. ft. WT (Total Wt. from Gradation Card) WR4 Total Wt minus the (- #4 Weight) on sieve analysis PR4 % of + #4 material 21627-11785 9842 (9842 / 21627) x 100 45.5079299 % e ce t o stu e OPTIMUM MOISTURE Sm Graph CONTENT OM 10.9 MXIMUM DRY DENSITY ( lb. / cu. ft. ) MD 126.8 Remarks : StudyGuideCalculations Key Percent Moisture

6 7 8 9 10 Practice Calculations # 4 10.9 11 12 13 14 15 16 130 130 129 129 128 128 127 127 126.8 126 126 125 125 124 124 123 123 122 122 121 121 120 120 119 119 118 118 6 7 8 9 10 10.9 11 12 13 14 15 16

RIZ 236 WORK CRD DETERMINING ph ND MINIMUM RESISTIVITY OF SOILS ND GGREGTES Lab Number: Practice Calulations Key Date: 10/27/2015 Project / TRCS #: Tested By: MINIMUM RESISTIVITY ph Range Setting Dial Reading 1,000 X 5.8 5,800 Resistance, Sample Water Ohms Weight: 50.1 g Weight: 50.1 g 1,000 X 4.5 4,500 Start Time: 1,000 X 4.1 4,100 Stir 1,000 X 2.7 2,700 Stir 1,000 X 1.8 1,800 Stir 1,000 X 1.4 1,400 Stir 100 X 1.9 190 Stir 100 X 3.9 390 Stir X Stir 9:00 9:10 9:20 9:30 9:40 9:50 10:00 X X Stir End Time: 10:00 Soil Box Factor 6.71 7.86 7.9 ph Reading ph Buffers used for calibration of ph meter: 7 & 10 (Minimum Resistivity, hm-cm) (Resistance, hm) x (Soil Box Factor, cm) ( 190 ) X ( 6.71 ) 1274.9 hm-cm MINIMUM RESISTIVITY 1275 hm-cm