Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Similar documents
MATH 223A NOTES 2011 LIE ALGEBRAS 35

Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

Root systems. S. Viswanath

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Classification of semisimple Lie algebras

Notes on Lie Algebras

Again we return to a row of 1 s! Furthermore, all the entries are positive integers.

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

ROOT SYSTEMS AND DYNKIN DIAGRAMS

Longest element of a finite Coxeter group

Classification of root systems

AND AFFINE ROOT SYSTEMS

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

Classification of Root Systems

Lie and Kac-Moody algebras

2.4 Root space decomposition

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

A SHORT COURSE IN LIE THEORY

e j = Ad(f i ) 1 2a ij/a ii

Counting chains in noncrossing partition lattices

(Kac Moody) Chevalley groups and Lie algebras with built in structure constants Lecture 1. Lisa Carbone Rutgers University

IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS. Contents

A LECTURE ON FINITE WEYL GROUPOIDS, OBERWOLFACH 2012

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

Kac Moody superalgebras and integrability

About polynomiality of the Poisson semicentre for parabolic subalgebras

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

Topics in Representation Theory: SU(n), Weyl Chambers and the Diagram of a Group

Enhanced Dynkin diagrams and Weyl orbits

Weyl s Character Formula for Representations of Semisimple Lie Algebras

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

The classification of root systems

Lie Algebras. Shlomo Sternberg

Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.

The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 7 11 May 2010

QUIVERS AND LATTICES.

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

A 2 G 2 A 1 A 1. (3) A double edge pointing from α i to α j if α i, α j are not perpendicular and α i 2 = 2 α j 2

SIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003

Lecture 10 - Representation Theory II: Heuristics

Kac-Moody Algebras. Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010

Austere pseudo-riemannian submanifolds and s-representations

Root system chip-firing

A Cartan subalgebra of g is a maximal abelian subalgebra h Ă g consisting of semisimple (diagonalizeable) elements. (Analogous to Jucys-Murphy

Lecture 19 - Clifford and Spin Representations

BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP

NEW REALIZATIONS OF THE MAXIMAL SATAKE COMPACTIFICATIONS OF RIEMANNIAN SYMMETRIC SPACES OF NON-COMPACT TYPE. 1. Introduction and the main results

Some notes on Coxeter groups

Ad-nilpotent ideals of Borel subalgebras: combinatorics and representation theory

Essays on the structure of reductive groups. Root systems. X (A) = Hom(A, G m ) t t t t i,

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

the root system of E 8.

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Root systems and optimal block designs

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

KNUTH RELATIONS FOR THE HYPEROCTAHEDRAL GROUPS

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

LECTURE 16: REPRESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Mathematics & Physics 2 (2008)

Fulton and Harris, Representation Theory, Graduate texts in Mathematics,

FILTRATIONS IN SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS, I

Final Project # 5 The Cartan matrix of a Root System

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n)

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

Weyl orbits of π-systems in Kac-Moody algebras

A method for construction of Lie group invariants

7. The classical and exceptional Lie algebras * version 1.4 *

Elementary linear algebra

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

QUANTUM MECHANIC S. Symmetries

AN UPPER BOUND FOR SIGNATURES OF IRREDUCIBLE, SELF-DUAL gl(n, C)-REPRESENTATIONS

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

The Lusztig-Vogan Bijection in the Case of the Trivial Representation

On some combinatorial aspects of Representation Theory

Physics 251 Solution Set 4 Spring 2013

5 Quiver Representations

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.

Linear Algebra Review. Vectors

Cartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26

SHELLABILITY AND HIGHER COHEN-MACAULAY CONNECTIVITY OF GENERALIZED CLUSTER COMPLEXES

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 15 Oct 2008

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Representation theory

Group Theory - QMII 2017

arxiv:math/ v3 [math.qa] 16 Feb 2003

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

Transcription:

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Ivan C.H. Ip Update: May 16, 2017 5 Review of Root Systems In this section, let us have a brief introduction to root system and finite Lie type classification using Dynkin diagrams. It follows [Fomin-Reading]. 5.1 Reflection groups Let V be Euclidean space. Definition 5.1. A reflection is a linear map s : V V that fixes a hyperplane, and reverse the direction of the normal vector of the hyperplane. A finite reflection group is a finite group generated by some reflections in V. α β s α (β) = β 2 α,β α,α α Figure 1: Orthogonal reflection Center for the Promotion of Interdisciplinary Education and Research/ Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Japan Email: ivan.ip@math.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1

Example 5.2. Symmetry of the pentagon, given by the reflection group I 2 (5) (Dihedral group) generated by s and t. Products of odd number of generators are again reflection through some hyperplane (indicated in the picture). Products of even number of generators are rotations by certain angles. Figure 2: The reflection group I 2 (5) In general I 2 (m) is a group with 2m elements, generated by reflections s, t such that (st) m = 1 and s 2 = t 2 = 1. Definition 5.3. The set H of all reflecting hyperplanes is called a Coxeter arrangement. It cuts V into connected components called regions. Lemma 5.4. Fix an arbitrary region R 1. Then the map w R w := w(r 1 ) is a bijection between reflection group W and the set of regions. Reflections by the facet hyperplanes of R 1 generates W. Let a hyperplane H α given by {v : (v, α) = 0} for some vector α (normal vector). Let s α be the reflection in the hyperplane H α. Then Lemma 5.5. s α is orthogonal linear transformation (i.e. preserving inner product), and 2(α, β) s α (β) = β (α, α) α 5.2 Root system Definition 5.6. A finite root system is a finite non-empty collection Φ of nonzero vectors in V called roots such that (1) For all α Φ, span(α) Φ = {±α}. 2

(2) If α Φ, then s α (Φ) = Φ. In particular if α Φ, then α Φ. Lemma 5.7. Any reflection group W correpsond to a root system Φ W : The roots correspond to the normal vector of the reflecting hyperplanes. Definition 5.8. The simple roots Π Φ are the roots normal to the facet hyperplanes of R 1 and pointing into the half-space containing R 1. The rank of Φ is n= dim(span(φ)) = #{simple roots}. Π = {α i : i I} for some index set I = [n] := {1, 2,..., n}. The set of positive roots Φ + (resp. negative roots Φ ) are the roots α = i I c iα i such that all c i 0. (resp. c i 0). Lemma 5.9. Φ is disjoint union of Φ + and Φ. We also assume (3) (Crystallographic condition) s α (β) = β c αβ α with c αβ = 2 (α,β) (α,α) Z. It means that any simple root coordinates of any root are integers. Crystallographic reflection group W is also called the Weyl group of Φ. Lemma 5.10. c αβ {0, ±1, ±2, ±3}. Proof. Let the angle between α and β be θ. Then (α, β) = α β cos θ, hence and c αβ = 2 β α cos θ Z c αβ c βα = 4 cos θ 2 Z which forces cos θ = 0, 1 2, 2 2, 3 β 2, 1. If we assume β α, then α = 1, 2, 3 respectively. (When cos θ = 0 there is no restriction. When cos θ = 1, β = ±α). Definition 5.11. The ambient space Q R (Φ) := R-span(Φ). Root systems Φ and Φ are isomorphic if there is an isometry of Q R (Φ) Q R (Φ ) that sends Φ to some dilation cφ of Φ. Definition 5.12. The Cartan matrix of Φ is an integer matrix C = (c ij ) i,j I where c ij := c αiα j = 2 (αi,αj) (α with α i,α i) i Π. Lemma 5.13. Root systems Φ and Φ are isomorphic iff they have same Cartan matrix up to simultaneous rearrangement of rows and columns (i.e. reindexing). Example 5.14. These are all 4 Cartan matrices of rank 2 and their corresponding root systems: 3

α 2 Type ( A 1 A 1 ) 2 0 C = 0 2 α 1 α 1 α 1 + α 2 Type ( A 2 2 1 C = 1 2 ) α 2 α 2 α 1 + α 2 2α 1 + α 2 Type ( B 2 2 2 C = 1 2 ) α 1 4

3α 1 + 2α 2 α 2 α 1 + α 2 2α 1 + α 2 3α 1 + α 2 Type ( G 2 2 3 C = 1 2 ) α 1 They correspond to tiling of the plane. Theorem 5.15. An integer n n matrix (c ij ) is a Cartan matrix of a root system iff (1) c ii = 2 for every i (2) c ij 0 if i j, and c ij = 0 c ji = 0 (3) There exists a diagonal matrix D such that DA is symmetric and positive definite (i.e. all eigenvalues > 0) Definition 5.16. A root system Φ is reducible if Φ = Φ 1 Φ 2 such that α Φ 1, β Φ 2 = (α, β) = 0, i.e. C is block diagonal with > 1 blocks. Otherwise it is irreducible. Definition 5.17. Cartan matrix of finite type can be encoded by Dynkin diagrams: Theorem 5.18 (Cartan-Killing classification of irreducible root system). Any irreducible root system is isomorphic to the root system corresponding to the Dynkin diagram of A n (n 1), B n (n 2), C n (n 3), D n (n 4), E 6, E 7, E 8, F 4 or G 2. 5

Example 5.19 (Root systems of type A n ). The root system is realized on the hyperplane P = {x 1 +... + x n = 0} R n+1. Simple roots are realized as α i := e i+1 e i R n+1 and positive roots are e i e j, 1 j < i n + 1. Example 5.20 (Root systems of type B n ). Simple roots are realized as α 1 = e 1, α i = e i e i 1, i 2 in R n. Positive roots are e i and e i ± e j for 1 j < i n. 6

Figure 3: Roots system of type B 3 Example 5.21 (Root systems of type C n ). Simple roots are realized as α 1 = 2e 1, α i = e i e i 1 in R n. Positive roots are 2e i and e i ± e j for 1 j < i n. The reflection group coincide with B n. Figure 4: Roots system of type C 3 In type B n and C n, the action of W on the roots are not transitive, there are 2 orbits, corresponding to short and long roots. Example 5.22 (Root system of type D n ). Simple roots are realized as α 0 = e 1 +e 2 and α i = e i+1 e i. Positive roots are e i ± e j for 1 j < i n. 5.3 Root Systems in Lie Theory Root systems are related to representation theory of Lie algebra. Consider simple Lie algebra g with Cartan subalgebra h (i.e. maximal commutative Lie subalgbera consisting of semisimple elements, i.e. diagonalizable in the adjoint representation). 7

Definition 5.23. Let V be a representation of g. For any homomorphism λ : h C, i.e. λ h, we can define V λ := {v V : ξ h : ξ v = λ(ξ)v} If V λ is nonempty, then V λ is called a weight space of V, and λ is called its weight. We have V = λ h V λ Definition 5.24. If V is the adjoint representation, i.e. g acts on itself V := g by g v = [g, v], then the set of nonzero weights form a root system Φ. i.e. a root α Φ is an element in h. In this case we have the root space decomposition g = h α Φ g α Classification of root systems then give a classification of simple Lie algebra. In particular, A n = sl n+1, B n = so 2n+1, C n = sp 2n and D n = so 2n. 5.4 Some useful calculations Φ + A 1 = {α} Φ + A 2 = {α 1, α 2, α 1 + α 2 } Φ + A 3 = {α 1, α 2, α 3, α 1 + α 2, α 2 + α 3, α 1 + α 2 + α 3 } Let s i := s αi. Then s i (α i ) = α i if c ij = 1, then s i (α j ) = α i + α j if c ij = 2, then s i (α j ) = 2α i + α j Each element w W can be written as product of simple reflections w = s i1 s i2...s il Shortest factorization of this form is called a reduced word for w, and l is called the length of w. Proposition 5.25. Any Weyl group has a unique element w 0 of maximal length, called the longest element W A1 = {1, s 1 } W A2 = {1, s 1, s 2, s 1 s 2, s 2 s 1, w 0 }, longest element is w 0 = s 1 s 2 s 1 = s 2 s 1 s 2 W A3 = S 4 the permutation group. w 0 = s 1 s 2 s 1 s 3 s 2 s 1 8

W An = S n+1 is generated by transposition s i = (i, i + 1). We have s i s i+1 s i = s i+1 s i s i+1. s 1 s 2 s 1 s 3 s 2 s 3 is non-reduced: it equals s 2 s 1 s 3 s 2. In type A 2, w 0 (α 1 ) = α 2, w 0 (α 2 ) = α 1 In type A 3, w 0 (α 1 ) = α 3, w 0 (α 2 ) = α 2, w 0 (α 3 ) = α 1 In general, w 0 (α i ) = α i. The map i i is called the Dynkin involution. Definition 5.26. Dynkin diagram has no cycles = bipartite. Let I = I + I where the nodes are marked as + and alternatively. A Coxeter element is defined as c = :=: t + t i I + s i i I s i The order h of c (i.e. c h = 1) is called Coxeter number. Proposition 5.27. The longest element w 0 can be written as w 0 = t + t t + t...t ± }{{} h In particular if g is not of type A 2n then h is even and w 0 = c h 2. Theorem 5.28. We have the following table: T ype Φ + h W A n n(n + 1)/2 n + 1 (n + 1)! B n, C n n 2 2n 2 n n! D n n(n 1) 2(n 1) 2 n 1 n! E 6 36 12 51840 E 7 63 18 2903040 E 8 120 30 696729600 F 4 24 12 1152 G 2 6 6 12 9