Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2

Similar documents
EXTRA DIMENSIONS LECTURE NOTES. Lecture notes are largely based on a lectures series given by Tim Tait on extra dimensions at TASI

Boundary Conditions in AdS Life Without a Higgs

Inter-brane distance stabilization by bulk Higgs field in RS model

Thick Brane World. Seyen Kouwn Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute Korea

BEYOND THE SM (II) Kaustubh Agashe (University of Maryland)

Solutions to gauge hierarchy problem. SS 10, Uli Haisch

STABILIZING EXTRA DIMENSIONS

Elementary/Composite Mixing in Randall-Sundrum Models

Introduction to Supersymmetry

Accidental SUSY at the LHC

This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author.

1. Introduction. [Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, Dvali]

Supersymmetric Randall-Sundrum Scenario

Theories with Compact Extra Dimensions

Warped Models in String Theory

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Domain Wall Brane in Eddington Inspired Born-Infeld Gravity

The Randall-Sundrum model

A naturally light & bent dilaton

Life with More Than 4: Extra Dimensions

Introduction to (Large) Extra Dimensions

ELECTROWEAK BREAKING IN EXTRA DIMENSIONS MINI REVIEW. Gero von Gersdorff (École Polytechnique) Moriond Electroweak Session, La Thuile, March 2011

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

Brane world scenarios

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes

Symmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

International Journal of Theoretical Physics, October 2015, Volume 54, Issue 10, pp ABSTRACT

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

Exact solutions in supergravity

Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Cosmology with Extra Dimensions

Braneworld in f(r) gravity and critical gravity

An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model

Braneworlds: gravity & cosmology. David Langlois APC & IAP, Paris

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

LOCALIZATION OF FIELDS ON A BRANE IN SIX DIMENSIONS.

Warped Penguins. Based on arxiv: In collaboration with Csaba Csáki, Yuval Grossman, Philip Tanedo. LEPP Particle Theory Seminar

Théorie des cordes: quelques applications. Cours II: 4 février 2011

A Short Note on D=3 N=1 Supergravity

Electroweak Symmetry Breaking via Strong Dynamics in the Precision Higgs Era: Extra Dimension and Composite Higgs.

QCD and a Holographic Model of Hadrons

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

SUPERSTRING REALIZATIONS OF SUPERGRAVITY IN TEN AND LOWER DIMENSIONS. John H. Schwarz. Dedicated to the memory of Joël Scherk

Holographic study of magnetically induced ρ meson condensation

A Higher Derivative Extension of the Salam-Sezgin Model from Superconformal Methods

8.821 F2008 Lecture 12: Boundary of AdS; Poincaré patch; wave equation in AdS

BULK AND BRANE SUPERSYMMETRY BREAKING. Jonathan Bagger SUSY 2002

Gravitational perturbations on branes

Numerical Solutions in 5D Standing Wave Braneworld

Holographic self-tuning of the cosmological constant

Yuhsin Tsai Cornell/Fermilab Warped Penguins 1/38

Physics 411 Lecture 22. E&M and Sources. Lecture 22. Physics 411 Classical Mechanics II

2T-physics and the Standard Model of Particles and Forces Itzhak Bars (USC)

Large Extra Dimensions and the Hierarchy Problem

Gauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised

Théorie des cordes: quelques applications. Cours IV: 11 février 2011

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

q form field and Hodge duality on brane

Intercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics. Paper 1: The Standard Model

Massive Spinors and ds/cft Correspondence

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16

Can Gravity be Localized?

Dilaton gravity at the brane with general matter-dilaton coupling

New Model of massive spin-2 particle

Fuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models

Dark matter and collider signatures from extra dimensions

How I learned to stop worrying and love the tachyon

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

Super Yang-Mills Theory in 10+2 dims. Another Step Toward M-theory

Asymptotic Symmetries and Holography

INTRODUCTION motivation 5d supergravity models An important question in supersymmetric theories is how supersymmetry is broken in the low energy world

The Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle

INTRODUCTION TO EXTRA DIMENSIONS

Open String Wavefunctions in Flux Compactifications. Fernando Marchesano

General Warped Solution in 6d Supergravity. Christoph Lüdeling

If I only had a Brane

Light KK modes in Custodially Symmetric Randall-Sundrum

Introduction to the Beyond the Standard Model session

QFT Dimensional Analysis

Lecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude

Departament de Física Grup de Física Teòrica

AdS/CFT duality. Agnese Bissi. March 26, Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics Erice. Mathematical Institute University of Oxford

Some Useful Formalism for Supersymmetry

Supersymmetric field theories

Lecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism

Beyond the unitarity bound in AdS/CFT

Introduction to AdS/CFT

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions

Quantum Field Theory III

Scalar field dark matter and the Higgs field

S = 2 decay in Warped Extra Dimensions

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 22 Dec 2017

Katrin Becker, Texas A&M University. Strings 2016, YMSC,Tsinghua University

On Special Geometry of Generalized G Structures and Flux Compactifications. Hu Sen, USTC. Hangzhou-Zhengzhou, 2007

Dynamical Domain Wall and Localization

Transcription:

Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 Generalities Benasque September 26, 2013 Mariano Quirós ICREA/IFAE Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 1 / 31

Introduction Introduction There are a number of theoretical and experimental issues motivating BSM: the hierarchy problem (HP), the flavour problem, the strong CP-problem, the existence of Dark Matter (and possibly Dark energy), the origin of baryons,... The main motivation for BSM has always been the hierarchy problem. The others have been treated within the proposed solutions to HP The hierarchy problem has two generic solutions: Either there is an extra symmetry such that the quadratic sensitivity of the Higgs mass to the scale cancels: the prototype is supersymmetry Or the Higgs is a composite field such that at high scales it dissolves into its constituents: the original prototype has been technicolor or its modern formulation in extra dimensions motivated by the AdS/CFT duality. As supersymmetry has already been covered at this School (M. Kramer s talks) I will try to motivate the issue of extra dimensions as a solution to the hierarchy (and others) problems Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 2 / 31

Bibliography Bibliography Some review papers M. Quiros, IJMPA (to appear) arxiv:1310.nnnn [hep-ph] E. Ponton, arxiv:1207.3827 [hep-ph] T. Gherghetta, arxiv:1008.2570 [hep-ph]. R. Contino, arxiv:1005.4269 [hep-ph]. H. -C. Cheng, arxiv:1003.1162 [hep-ph]. G. D. Kribs, hep-ph/0605325. C. Csaki, J. Hubisz and P. Meade, hep-ph/0510275. C. Csaki, [hep-ph/0404096] M. Quiros, [hep-ph/0302189] Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 3 / 31

Outline Outline The outline of this lecture is The 5D metric background The superpotential method Particular cases: flat background, AdS 5 background, general warped backgrounds Scalars in the bulk EOM & BC s KK decomposition Gauge bosons in the bulk EOM & BC s KK decomposition Fermions in the bulk EOM & BC s KK decomposition Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 4 / 31

The metric The metric background The most general five-dimensional metric consistent with four-dimensional Poincaré symmetry is ds 2 = g MN dx M dx N = e 2A(y) η µν dx µ dx ν dy 2 with η µν = diag{1, 1, 1, 1, 1} We include a scalar field φ(x, y) in the action (units M 5 1): S = M d 5 x g [ 1 4 R + 1 ] 2 ( Mφ) 2 V (φ) d 4 x ḡλ α (φ) M where M is the full five-dimensional spacetime, M is the codimension one hypersurface where each brane is located and ḡ is the induced metric. It will always be assumed that the branes are at definite values of y = y α, α = 0, 1 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 5 / 31

The metric The Ricci tensor: The EOM are R µν = e 2A (4A 2 A ) η µν R 55 = 4A 2 + 4A V (φ) φ δs/δφ : φ 4A φ = + α δs/δg µν : A = 2 3 φ 2 + 2 λ α (φ)δ(y y α ), 3 α δs/δg 55 : A 2 = 1 3 V (φ) + 1 6 φ 2 λ α (φ) φ δ(y y α) { d/dy} By integrating the first two equations on (y α ɛ, y α + ɛ) the jump conditions are A r α+ɛ r α ɛ = 2 3 λ α(φ(r α )), φ rα+ɛ r α ɛ = λ α φ (φ(r α)) Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 6 / 31

The metric The superpotential method the superpotential method Solving these EOM is quite hard. But there is a class of potentials for which EOM are analytically tractable Suppose V (φ) has the special form, for some W (φ) V (φ) = 1 8 ( W (φ) φ ) 2 1 3 W (φ)2 Then it is straightforward to verify that a solution to φ = 1 W (φ), A = 1 2 φ 3 W (φ) is also a solution to EOM, provided we have 1 2 W (φ) y α+ɛ y α ɛ = λ α(φ(y α )), 1 2 W (φ) φ y α+ɛ y α ɛ = λ α φ (φ(y α)) Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 7 / 31

The metric The superpotential method The jump conditions are written in the language of the S 1 /Z 2 orbifold As the metric A is even under the action of Z 2 the superpotential W is odd The jump conditions become A (y 0 + ɛ) = 1 3 λ 0(φ 0 ), φ (y 0 + ɛ) = 1 λ 0 (φ 0 ) 2 φ A (y 1 ɛ) = 1 3 λ 1(φ 1 ), φ (y 1 ɛ) = 1 λ 1 (φ 1 ) 2 φ where φ α φ(y α ) (α = 0, 1) are constants to be interpreted as boundary field values From where (here = / φ) λ 0 (φ) = W (φ 0 ) + W (φ 0 )(φ φ 0 ) + 1 2 W (φ 0 )(φ φ 0 ) 2 + λ 1 (φ) = W (φ 1 ) W (φ 1 )(φ φ 1 ) 1 2 W (φ 0 )(φ φ 0 ) 2 + Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 8 / 31

The metric Particular cases Particular cases Flat case The simplest case corresponds to a flat extra dimension, i.e. ds 2 = η µν dx µ dx ν This case corresponds to W = 0 {A = 0, φ 0; λ 0 = λ 1 = 0} AdS 5 This case corresponds to W = 3k {A = ky, φ 0; λ 0 = λ 1 = 3k}, i.e. a negative brane tension in the IR. The vacuum energy V = 1 3 W 2 = 3k 2 corresponds to Anti-de-Sitter in 5D (AdS 5 ) Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 9 / 31

The metric Particular cases RS1 setup y = L y =0 L y 1 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 10 / 31

The metric Particular cases General warped: soft-walls One can introduce a more general superpotential as W = 6k (1 ) + e νφ/ 6 The bulk solutions from the superpotential method are 6 φ(y) = ν log { ν 2 k(y s y) } A(y) = ky 1 ν 2 log ( 1 y y s ) controlled by two parameters: ν and y s The bulk solutions exhibit a (naked) singularity at y = y s > y 1 (beyond y 1 but in its vicinity) Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 11 / 31

The metric Particular cases Singular background y s A y Φ L Like AdS y Φ 0 y 0 y L Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 12 / 31

Scalars in the bulk Scalars in the bulk In this section we will consider a scalar field (typically the SM Higgs) propagating in the bulk of a given gravitational background A(y) In other words we will neglect the back-reaction of the scalar field on the metric We will consider the 5D action S = d 5 x { } 1 g 2 g MN M Φ N Φ V (Φ) We will use the notation for the metric g µν = e 2A(y) η µν, g 55 = 1 and for the induced metric at the brane y α ḡ µν = e 2A(yα) η µν, A(0) = 0 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 13 / 31

Scalars in the bulk EOM & BC EOM & BC EOM BC s Under a variation δφ one finds: δs = δs M + δs M where δs M = d 5 x { 1 [ g ] g g M g MN N Φ + V } δφ Φ δs M = d 4 x g g 5N N Φ δφ y=l, from integration by parts y=0 We have to impose δs M = δs M = 0 for arbitrary δφ, i.e. ] e 2A µ µ Φ e 4A y [e 4A y Φ + V = 0 y Φ δφ y=y1 + y Φ δφ y=0 = 0 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 14 / 31

Scalars in the bulk EOM & BC The boundary conditions can be satisfied in essentially two ways Neumann (N or +): y Φ y=yα = 0, Dirichlet (D or -): Φ y=yα = 0, Various combinations are then: (+, +), (+, ), (, +), ( ) The most general BC s are (Robin BC s) y Φ y=yα mφ y=yα = 0 This indicates that there is a source on the boundary. For instance, adding a boundary term to the action S boundary = d 4 x ḡ 1 2 mφ2 y=yα Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 15 / 31

KK decomposition KK decomposition A central concept in extra-dimensional physics is that the theory of a bulk field propagating in a compact extra dimension can be rewritten as a 4D theory involving an infinite number of 4D fields. For a free scalar S = d 4 x 1 { µ φ n µ φ n m 2 nφ 2 2 } n n The φ n (x µ ) are known as Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes. The information about the background is fully contained in the KK spectrum, m n We write the Fourier-mode decomposition as Φ(x µ, y) = ea(y) φ n (x µ )f n (y) y1 KK decomposition for free action, interactions treated perturbatively Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 16 / 31 n

KK decomposition In the KK expansion we pulled out e A(y), which gives the f n s a direct physical interpretation in terms of localization properties of the KK-modes along the extra dimension ( physical wavefunctions ). The interpretation of φ n as a (free) 4D scalar field of mass m n means that µ µ φ n + m 2 nφ n = 0 Replacing the KK decomposition into the bulk EOM yields [ ] f n 2A f n + A 3(A ) 2 M 2 + e 2A mn 2 f n = 0 while the functions f n form a complete set of orthonormal functions satisfying the relation 1 y 1 y1 0 dy f m f n = δ mn, The KK masses, m 2 n, are found by solving the EOM for the f n and requiring the desired BC s Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 17 / 31

Gauge bosons in the bulk Gauge bosons in the bulk We will consider here gauge fields propagating in 5D The action S A = d 5 x g { 14 } { g MN g KL F MK F NL = d 5 x 1 4 F µνf µν + 1 2 e 2A µ A 5 µ A 5 5 [ e 2A A 5 ] µ A µ + 1 2 e 2A 5 A µ 5 A µ } + S M S M = d 4 x e 2A A 5 µ A µ y=y 1 There is a bulk term mixing A µ and A 5. We cancel it by the gauge fixing action S GF = d 5 x 1 ]} 2 { µ A µ ξ 5 [e 2A A 5 2ξ y=0 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 18 / 31

Gauge bosons in the bulk The total gauge action then becomes S A = d 5 x { 1 4 F µνf µν 1 2ξ ( µa µ ) 2 + 1 2 e 2A 5 A µ 5 A µ + 1 2 e 2A µ A 5 µ A 5 1 2 ξ ( 5 [ e 2A A 5 ]) 2 } + S M A couple of comments We will be interested in the quadratic part of the action so that there should be no distinction between abelian and non-abelian cases The Faddeev-Popov procedure, when applied to our gauge-fixing action S GF leads to ghost fields Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 19 / 31

Gauge bosons in the bulk EOM & BC EOM & BC The variational procedure leads Under δa µ δs M A = ( d 5 x δa µ {[η µν 1 1 ) ] } µ ν η µν 5 e 2A 5 A ν ξ δsa M = d 4 x e 2A δa µ { 5 A µ µ A 5 } y=y 1 y=0 Under δa 5 δs M A δs M A = = d 5 x e 2A δa 5 { + ξ 2 5e 2A} A 5 d 4 x e 2A δa 5 { ξ 5 [ e 2A A 5 ] + µ A µ} y=y 1 y=0 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 20 / 31

Gauge bosons in the bulk EOM & BC Therefore the EOM are [ ( η µν 1 1 ) ] [ µ ν A ν 5 e 2A 5 A µ] = 0 ξ ] A 5 ξ 5 [e 2 2A A 5 = 0 And the BC s are Two interesting BC s are 5 A µ µ A 5 y=y 1 y=0 = 0 [ ] ξ 5 e 2A A 5 + µ A µ y=y 1 = 0 y=0 or (+) A 5 yα = 0 5 A µ yα = 0, ( ) A µ yα = 0 5 [ e 2A A 5 ] yα = 0. Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 21 / 31

Gauge bosons in the bulk KK decomposition KK decomposition We write the KK decomposition A µ,5 (x µ, y) = 1 A n y1 µ,5(x µ )fa,5 n (y) Replacing the KK decomposition into the bulk EOM s yields to ] y [e 2A y fa n + mnf 2 A n = 0 ( ) y 2 e 2A f5 n + mnf 2 5 n = 0 The KK wavefunctions are normalized as expected 1 y 1 y1 0 n dy f m A,5 f n A,5 = δ mn Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 22 / 31

Gauge bosons in the bulk KK decomposition NN A solution fa n with m2 n 0 gives a solution for f5 n = 5fA n/m n The reason is that A n 5 with such f n 5 provides the longitudinal polarization of the massive A n µ: compactification breaks the gauge invariance spontaneously and there is a Higgs mechanism at work in the unitary gauge at each KK level The BC s are important to identify physical theories For (+, +) BC s, i.e. y fa n = f 5 n = 0 on both branes, one finds a spin-1 zero-mode with fa 0 (y) = 1 and f 0 5 (y) = 0. Presumably, such a state could be identified with one of the observed SM gauge bosons DD For (, ) BC s, i.e. y (e 2A f5 n) = fa n = 0 on both branes, there is no spin-1 zero-mode, but there is a spin-0 zero-mode with f5 0(y) e2a(y). In certain constructions, such scalars can be identified with the SM Higgs field Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 23 / 31

Fermions in the bulk Fermions in the bulk First we need five anticommuting Dirac Γ-matrices, for which we can take Γ A = (γ α, iγ 5 ) In the Weyl representation, ( ) γ µ 0 σ µ = σ µ, 0 σ µ ( = (1, σ) 1 0 σ µ = (1, σ), γ 5 = 0 1 which obey {Γ A, Γ B } = 2η AB We also need the fünfbein, em A defined by g MN = em A e N B η AB, e M A e M B = δb A e µ α = e +A(y) δ µ α, e y 5 = 1 with all other components vanishing Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 24 / 31 )

Fermions in the bulk We also need a spin connection ω MAB to define the covariant derivative with respect to general coordinate and local Lorentz transformations in 5D The covariant derivative is ω a5 µ = ω 5a µ = 5 (e A )δ a µ D M = M + 1 8 ω MAB[Γ A, Γ B ] { Dµ = µ i 2 e A A γ µ γ 5 D 5 = 5 The fermion action is S Ψ = d 5 x { i g 2 ΨeM A ΓA D M Ψ i } 2 (D MΨ) Γ 0 e M A ΓA Ψ MΨΨ = d 5 x e {i 3A Ψγ µ µ Ψ + 1 [ 2 e A Ψγ 5 5 Ψ ( 5 Ψ)γ 5 Ψ ] } e A MΨΨ Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 25 / 31

Fermions in the bulk EOM & BC EOM & BC Taking the variation with respect to δ Ψ we obtain the EOM and BC s { δ Ψ i e A γ µ µ + ( 5 2A ) } γ 5 M Ψ = 0 δψγ 5 Ψ y=y1 + δψγ 5 Ψ y=0 = 0 It is useful to express them in terms of chiral components Ψ L,R = P L,R Ψ 1 2 (1 γ 5)Ψ i e A γ µ µ Ψ L + [( 5 2A ) M ] Ψ R = 0 i e A γ µ µ Ψ R + [ ( 5 2A ) M ] Ψ L = 0 δψ L Ψ R δψ R Ψ L y=y 1 y=0 = 0 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 26 / 31

Fermions in the bulk EOM & BC We can use as BC Ψ L = 0 or ΨR = 0 We do not have the right to impose Dirichlet b.c. s conditions on both chiralities at a given boundary! For instance if Ψ L yα = 0, then the first equation implies 5 Ψ R yα = ( 2A + M ) Ψ R yα If we were to also impose Ψ R yα = 0, we would automatically have 5 Ψ R yα = 0, and then from the second equation we would find 5 Ψ L yα = 0 But then the only allowed solution of the system of two first-order differential equations (in y) is Ψ 0 Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 27 / 31

Fermions in the bulk EOM & BC Only two possibilities then or ( ) Ψ L yα = 0, hence 5 Ψ R yα = ( 1 2 A + M ) Ψ R yα, (+) Ψ R yα = 0, hence 5 Ψ L yα = ( 1 2 A M ) Ψ L yα. Compactification on an interval necessarily leads to boundary conditions that distinguish L from R, which will allow us to easily embed the SM structure Similar to the scalar case, specifying the boundary conditions on both boundaries leads to four possibilities that we label as (+, +) (+, ) (, +) (, ) Also, as in the scalar case, one can generalize these boundary conditions by including localized terms in the action which contribute directly to δs M Ψ. Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 28 / 31

Fermions in the bulk KK decomposition KK decomposition We write the KK decomposition as Ψ L,R (x µ, y) = e 3 2 A(y) y1 n ψ n L,R (x µ )f n L,R (y) The wave-functions f n satisfy the EOM and orthogonality relations (iγ µ µ m n ) ψ n = 0 ( y + M 12 A ) f n L = m ne A f n R ( y M 12 A ) f n R = m ne A f n L 1 y 1 y1 0 dy f m L,R f n L,R = δ mn Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 29 / 31

Fermions in the bulk KK decomposition And the two types of BC s or ( ) : y f n R ( M + 1 2 A ) (+) : y f n L + ( M 1 2 A ) f n R f n L = 0 & fl n yα = 0, yα = 0 & fr n yα = 0, yα A special case for the zero-mode m 0 = 0 happens when M = ±c A (y) for [(+,+),(-,-)] BC s f 0 L,R (y) N 0 e (c 1 2 )A(y), f 0 R,L (y) 0 The localization properties can then be conveniently described by c For instance, in the case of AdS 5, with A = k, c is just the Dirac mass M in units of the curvature scale k. Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 30 / 31

Fermions in the bulk KK decomposition Singular background c 1 2 c 1 2 0 c 1 2 0 L Mariano Quirós (ICREA/IFAE) Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2 31 / 31