Instructions for Running the FVS-WRENSS Water Yield Post-processor

Similar documents
Urban Forest Effects-Dry Deposition (UFORE D) Model Enhancements. Satoshi Hirabayashi

Snow Melt with the Land Climate Boundary Condition

Effects of forest cover and environmental variables on snow accumulation and melt

Climatic Change Implications for Hydrologic Systems in the Sierra Nevada

A Century of Meteorological Observations at Fort Valley Experimental Forest: A Cooperative Observer Program Success Story

Great Lakes Online Watershed Interface W. Elliot, Research Engineer USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID March, 2016

Lecture 6: Precipitation Averages and Interception

Flood Forecasting Tools for Ungauged Streams in Alberta: Status and Lessons from the Flood of 2013

Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Innsbruck, Austria, 2018

WindNinja Tutorial 3: Point Initialization

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Water Information Portal User Guide. Updated July 2014

Markville. CGC 1DL/PL Geography. Geography of Canada. Natural Environment Unit Test

Lake Tahoe Watershed Model. Lessons Learned through the Model Development Process

Using the EartH2Observe data portal to analyse drought indicators. Lesson 4: Using Python Notebook to access and process data

Water Yield and Precipitation Inputs for ECA-AB Analysis Grand Prairie Forest Management Area Weyerhaeuser Canada Ltd.

Workshop: Build a Basic HEC-HMS Model from Scratch


Studying Topography, Orographic Rainfall, and Ecosystems (STORE)

Studying Topography, Orographic Rainfall, and Ecosystems (STORE)

WeatherHawk Weather Station Protocol

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF OREGON

Methodology and Data Sources for Agriculture and Forestry s Interpolated Data ( )

Snow processes and their drivers in Sierra Nevada (Spain), and implications for modelling.

Exercie 5 Preparing GIS data for simulation with FARSITE REM407 GIS Applications in Fire Ecology and Management

What we are trying to accomplish during the winter season

NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System February 7, 2017

Ryan P. Shadbolt * Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan

2003 Moisture Outlook

Indicator Trends for Canadian Climate Changes during the Last 60 to 140 Years

Lecture 3A: Interception

Arizona Climate Summary February 2012

The elevations on the interior plateau generally vary between 300 and 650 meters with

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 18, 2017

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

Snowmelt runoff forecasts in Colorado with remote sensing

FireFamilyPlus Version 5.0

Gridding of precipitation and air temperature observations in Belgium. Michel Journée Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMI)

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

Quick Start Guide New Mountain Visit our Website to Register Your Copy (weatherview32.com)

Preliminary Runoff Outlook February 2018

Prediction of Snow Water Equivalent in the Snake River Basin

Regional offline land surface simulations over eastern Canada using CLASS. Diana Verseghy Climate Research Division Environment Canada

Appendix D. Model Setup, Calibration, and Validation

The TexasET Network and Website User s Manual

Definitions Weather and Climate Climates of NYS Weather Climate 2012 Characteristics of Climate Regions of NYS NYS s Climates 1.

CoCoRaHS Monitoring Colorado s s Water Resources through Community Collaborations

Climates of NYS. Definitions. Climate Regions of NYS. Storm Tracks. Climate Controls 10/13/2011. Characteristics of NYS s Climates

WindNinja Tutorial 3: Point Initialization

APPENDIX B Hydrologic Model Spring Event

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

Arizona Climate Summary April 2013

The following information is provided for your use in describing climate and water supply conditions in the West as of April 1, 2003.

Moisture Situation Update November 6, 2016

Predicting Fire Season Severity in the Pacific Northwest

AERMOD Sensitivity to AERSURFACE Moisture Conditions and Temporal Resolution. Paper No Prepared By:

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

Climate Change in Colorado: Recent Trends, Future Projections and Impacts An Update to the Executive Summary of the 2014 Report

Extracting Canadian Climate Data from Environment Canada dataset

MT-CLIM for Excel. William M. Jolly Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group College of Forestry and Conservation University of Montana c 2003

Watershed simulation and forecasting system with a GIS-oriented user interface

The North American Drought Monitor - The Canadian Perspective -

Fire Season Prediction for Canada, Kerry Anderson Canadian Forest Service

APPENDIX A LAKE EVAPORATION

Introduction to Climatology. GEOG/ENST 2331: Lecture 1

INVISIBLE WATER COSTS

Arizona Climate Summary March 2013

The Colorado Drought of 2002 in Perspective

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 21, 2017

Water Supply Conditions and Outlook June 4, 2018

Snowcover interaction with climate, topography & vegetation in mountain catchments

ESTIMATION OF NEW SNOW DENSITY USING 42 SEASONS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA FROM JACKSON HOLE MOUNTAIN RESORT, WYOMING. Inversion Labs, Wilson, WY, USA 2

Using SkyTools to log Texas 45 list objects

Storm and Runoff Calculation Standard Review Snowmelt and Climate Change

MODELING PRECIPITATION OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN IN ICELAND

Enabling Climate Information Services for Europe

Climate. Annual Temperature (Last 30 Years) January Temperature. July Temperature. Average Precipitation (Last 30 Years)

Pass, San Juan Mountains, Southwest Colorado

Display and analysis of weather data from NCDC using ArcGIS

2. PHYSICAL SETTING FINAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2.1 Topography. 2.2 Climate

Savannah River Site Mixed Waste Management Facility Southwest Plume Tritium Phytoremediation

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System October 30, 2018

Drought and Climate Extremes Indices for the North American Drought Monitor and North America Climate Extremes Monitoring System. Richard R. Heim Jr.

MEMORANDUM. Jerry Conrow, Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency

1.Introduction 2.Relocation Information 3.Tourism 4.Population & Demographics 5.Education 6.Employment & Income 7.City Fees & Taxes 8.

Watershed Modeling Orange County Hydrology Using GIS Data

Scientific research and tools to support management and protection of water supplies from the effects of wildfires

January 2011 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast

Arizona Climate Summary February 2018 Summary of conditions for January 2018

Upper Missouri River Basin December 2017 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast December 5, 2017

Seasonal and Spatial Patterns of Rainfall Trends on the Canadian Prairie

Introduction to Climatology. GEOG/ENST 2331: Lecture 1

Hydrologic Forecast Centre Manitoba Infrastructure, Winnipeg, Manitoba. FEBRUARY OUTLOOK REPORT FOR MANITOBA February 23, 2018

Spatial Optimization of CoCoRAHS Network in Tennessee. Joanne Logan Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science University of Tennessee

How does the physical environment influence communities and ecosystems? Hoodoos in Cappadocia, Turkey

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 14, 2017

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

FireFamily Plus User s Guide

Transcription:

Instructions for Running the FVS-WRENSS Water Yield Post-processor Overview The FVS-WRENSS post processor uses the stand attributes and vegetative data from the Forest Vegetation Simulator (Dixon, 2002) projections, and State Climate Normals precipitation data (or custom user-input data) to calculate stand water yield using the methodology described in Chapter III of the Water Resources Evaluation of Non-point Silvicultural Sources (WRENSS) Handbook (Troendle and Leaf, 1980). The purpose of the FVS-WRENSS post-processor is to predict water yield changes caused by silvicultural actions or stand disturbance. The water balance predictions should be used to compare alternative scenarios, they are not considered accurate as stand-alone predictions. Automated WRENSS computations were first programmed by Bernier (1986) for the snowdominated areas of Southern Canada. Huff and others (1999) expanded Bernier s Fortran program to both rain- and snow-dominated procedures in the Central Sierra region of the US, and applied the program to a GIS analysis of water yield changes. The FVS-WRENSS post processor was developed from the program written by Huff and others (1999) and expanded to cover the rain- and snow-dominated regions of the United States, and to incorporate the current snow redistribution theory in Hydrologic Province 4 referred to as the Modified Rocky Mountain method. In Province 4, the snow redistribution hydrology and ET calculations may be optionally modeled using the Modified Rocky Mountain procedure (Troendle and others, 2010). In this method, stand basal area is not converted to cover density using the WRENSS Handbook curves. ET modifier coefficients are a function of the relative basal area of either conifer or deciduous cover types. There are 4 linear relationships that describe ET Modifier Coefficients (values 0 to 1) and stand basal area. There are three curves for conifers, for the 3 aspects N, S and E&W, and a single curve for aspen which is used for all deciduous stands. When using the WRENSS Handbook snow redistribution method, the Handbook Cover Density ET methods are used. There are 10 unique Cover Density versus basal area curves in the WRENSS Handbook (figures III.41 III.45). These curves are used to describe the maximum cover density as a function of the stand basal area. ET modifier coefficients (figures III-46 III.56) are based on season and stand aspect and are used to adjust the maximum cover density to actual stand conditions for ET calculations. Table 1. The relationship between the WRENSS Handbook Forest Types and the FIA Cover Type Codes used in FVS. FOREST TYPE FIA CODE HYDROLOGIC PROVINCE 1) CONIFEROUS <= 400 1 2) DECIDUOUS > 400 1,4,5,6,7

3) SPRUCE-FIR 260,270, 120-129 4, 6 4) LODGEPOLE(Default) 281 4 5) PONDEROSA 220,221 4 6) HEM-SPRUCE 270,301,304,305 5 7) DOUG.FIR 201,202,222,223, 5 224,241,341 8) LODGEPOLE 281 7 9) WEST.LARCH 321-329 6 10) LODGEPOLE 281 6 Input Data Preparation When used as an FVS post-processor, the FVS-WRENSS Input file (WRENSSIN.DAT) is generated by a program (readfvsfiles.exe) that parses the FVS main output file (the.out file). This file is copied to a file with the.dat extension and has the same name as the FVS.out file. The.dat file may be manually edited to adjust the input data for simulation. The other input file required to run FVS-WRENSS is the State Climate Normals (STATENAME.TXT) file. The FVS main output file should be located in the project directory. The default project directory is c:\fvsdata, but any directory may be used. FVS Simulations Prepare the FVS input data with the management actions desired. The compute statement, below, MUST be included in the.key file for each stand. These compute statements may be added through Suppose by selecting - Select Outputs > Event Monitor (EM) Compute Variables > Compute WRENSS Variables. The maximum basal area calculated by FVS is used to calculate the relative cover density used in the estimation of the ET modifier coefficients. FVS-WRENSS may be run through Suppose, as described above, or one may manually browse to an FVS output file using the WRENSS GUI. Create a desktop shortcut to c:\fvsbin\fvs-wrenss.exe to access WRENSS outside of FVS. COMPUTE 0 BAMAXWY=BSDIMAX*.5454154*.85 BAMAXEND=ASDIMAX*.5454154*.85 END Meteorological File Obtain a State Normals Climate file or use one of the files from the National Climate Data Center provided in the FVS setup package. Select a meteorological station that best represents the precipitation statistics of the site. The WRENSS program uses the station number to find the elevation and monthly precipitation data in the State Normals file. The station elevation is read in the first group of data and the monthly precipitation statistics are read in the third group of data. New station numbers may be added with site specific data as long as the number is unique, and the format is consistent with the State Climate Normals data file format.

Precipitation Time Series: FVS simulations may have a time horizon long enough where climate change could be expected to impact precipitation trends. To represent the effects of climate change, the input precipitation pattern may be varied for each cycle of the FVS simulation by adding custom precipitation records to the State Normals data file. Each custom precipitation record represents data for a single cycle. Station numbers must be greater than 1000 and appear consecutively (e.g. 1001, 1002, 1003,...). Add these records to the end of the PRECIPITATION NORMALS section of the State Normals file. Add a record having the first station number of the series to the end of the first section, the STATE INVENTORY section. See the COLORADO.TXT State Normals file for an example of how to use time series precipitation in FVS-WRENSS simulations. Running FVS-WRENSS Run the FVS-WRENSS Post-Processor Through Suppose To run the FVS-WRENSS post-processor through Suppose, press the Select Post Processors button, and then select WRENSS Water Yield from the list of available post-processors. Press the Select Outputs button and select Event Monitor (EM) Compute Variables from the list of outputs, then select Compute WRENSS variables. If the FVS Output File Processed window appears at the end of the FVS simulation, press OK and the FVS-WRENSS GUI will start. Select Meteorological Station from State Climate Normals Data Use the Browse button to select the State Climate Normals meteorological file (e.g. ARIZONA.TXT). Select the record with the meteorological station to be used for input precipitation and station elevation data and click OK. The station number box is automatically populated. FVS-WRENSS Parameters The seven text boxes contain input parameters for the water yield simulations, and default values are shown. Meteorological Station Number. Browse to the State Normals data file and select a meteorological station or enter the meteorological station number in the text box. WRENSS Hydrologic Province. Press Map to display the hydrologic provinces used in the FVS-WRENSS model. FVS-WRENSS uses different hydrologic evaluation methods in rain-dominated regions compared with snow-dominated regions. Some hydrologic provinces use both procedures (e.g. provinces 5, 6 and 7) with snow dominating in high elevations (greater than 610 meters), and rainfall dominating in lower elevations (less than 610 meters) (Huff and others 1999). In province 7 the snow-dominated region above 610 meters is separated into high and low snow regions at an elevation of 1220 meters. Select the appropriate Province for the study site using the drop down list.

Rainfall Lapse Rate (in/1000 ft elevation change). If the study site is at a significantly different elevation than the meteorological station, a rainfall lapse rate may be used to adjust the measured precipitation statistics to better represent the precipitation at the study site. Enter zero if no rainfall lapse rate is to be used in the analysis. An example lapse rate for the Canadian Rocky Mountain foothills is 0.342 in/1000 ft. (Smith 2009). Average Daily Snowfall Rate (mm/day). The daily snowfall rate is used in Province 4 snow hydrology simulation. It is used to estimate the number of snowfall days in the winter season by dividing the total winter season precipitation by the average daily precipitation (snowfall) rate. If the winter season length is shorter than the number of precipitation days, calculated in this manner, snowpack ablation will be insignificant. The default value is 2.0 mm/day. Average Root Depth (feet). The average tree root depth is used in rainfall dominated provinces 2 and 3, and low elevation areas (below 610 m) in provinces 5, 6, and 7. The default value is 4.0 feet. Snow Method Province 4. The snow redistribution method may be specified in Province 4. The WRENSS handbook considers snow redistribution to be insignificant in the other provinces except for the very western part of Province 1, and FVS-WRENSS does not simulate snow redistribution in Province 1. Use the drop down box to select either the Handbook snow redistribution method or the Modified Rocky Mountain Method. Wind Speed (km/hr). The U10 wind speed is used in Province 4 snow hydrology simulation. It is important in snow pack ablation, when the number of snowfall-free days is significant (i.e. when the average daily snowfall rate is relatively high compared to the total winter precipitation). The default value is 10.0 km/hour. Number of Cut Blocks. The number of cut blocks in the harvest is used with the percent of stand harvested to estimate the opening size for snow redistribution calculations in Province 4. The default is 0. Percent of Stand Harvested (percent). The percent of the stand harvested is used in Province 4 snow redistribution calculations. The default is 80 percent. Run WRENSS Model Press the Run button to run WRENSS. A window showing WRENSS Completed is displayed. Press OK. The output files are stored in the project directory. The Details, and Summary output files may be displayed by pressing buttons at the bottom of the form. Output Files The WRENSS output file names are prepended with the FVS main output file name (e.g. fvsoutname), and have the extension.wrn. The FVS-WRENSS output tables show annual or seasonal stand water balance calculations at FVS cycle boundaries. All units are in inches, except

for fields in acre-feet in the area-weighted calculations. To sum the volume over time, multiply these annual water balance results by the FVS cycle length in years. The fvsoutname_details.wrn file provides the detailed, seasonal, stand water balance results. The Forest column represents the pre-treatment water balance components. The Cut column represents the after-treatment water balance components. The Change column shows the difference between the pre-and after-treatment conditions for the treatment cycle. The Effective Precipitation column (EFF. PRECIP.) represents the total precipitation minus interception (Forest) or snowpack scour and evaporation (Cut) losses. The table at the bottom of the file shows the area-weighted water balance values for the entire group of stands in the simulation. The values represent the after-treatment water balance components for the year shown. The fvsoutname_summary.wrn file provides a summary of the stand annual water balance components, basal area, and WRENSS cover type (see Table 1) for each cycle. The values are calculated using after-treatment stand conditions. The water yield Change column in the Details and Summary tables indicates the difference between the pre- and post-treatment states for the treatment cycle. The effects of treatment on water yield may persist in subsequent cycles as the stand recovers. The fvsoutname_chartout.wrn file shows the stand sequential number, year, water yield flow and water yield change for all stands in the run. The fvsoutname_output.wrn, and fvsoutname_input.wrn files show model debug output. They are overwritten each time the model is run. For more information or questions contact Robert Havis, 970/295-5768, rhavis@fs.fed.us References Bernier, P. Y. 1986. A programmed procedure for evaluating the effect of forest management on water yield. Forestry Management Note No. 37. Northern Forestry Center, Canadian Forestry Service, Edmonton, Alberta, 12p. Dixon, Gary, D. 2002. Essential FVS: A user guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center, Fort Collins, Colorado. Huff, D. D.; W. W. Hargrove; R. L. Graham. 1999. Adaptation of WRENSS-Fortran-77 for a GIS application for water-yield changes. ORNL/TM-13747, ESD publication number 4860. Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 50p. Smith, Craig D. 2009. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Western Snow Conference April 20-23 2009, Canmore, Alberta, Canada. (1) Climate Research Division, Environment, Canada, 11 Innovation Blvd. Saskatoon, SK, S7N 3H5.

Troendle, Charles, A. Lee H. MacDonald, Charles H. Luce, and I.J. Larsen. 2010. Fuel Management and Water Yield, in Cumulative Watershed Effects of Fuel Management in the Western United States, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-GTR-231, Chapter 7, pp.126-148 Troendle, C.A.; Leaf, Charles F. 1980. Hydrology. Chapter III. In: An approach to water resources evaluation of non-point silvicultural sources. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. August 1980. EPA-600/8-80-012 Athens GA. III.1-III.173