The R&D study for the KLOD experiment. at IHEP (Protvino) U-70 proton

Similar documents
PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

PoS(BORMIO2016)013. PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter. P.A. Semenov IHEP NRC KI S.I. Bukreeva IHEP NRC KI ITEP NRC KI

PoS(KAON)049. Testing the µ e universality with K ± l ± ν decays

Status of KEK-E391a and Future Prospects on K L π 0 νν at KEK. GeiYoub Lim IPNS, KEK

The NUCLEON Space Experiment Preliminary Results. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, , Russia

Thin Calorimetry for Cosmic-Ray Studies Outside the Earth s Atmosphere. 1 Introduction

STATUS OF ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER AND STUDY OF MUON INTERACTIONS. 1 Brief Description of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter

CsI Calorimeter for KOTO experiment

David Gascón. Daniel Peralta. Universitat de Barcelona, ECM department. E Diagonal 647 (Barcelona) IFAE, Universitat Aut onoma de Barcelona

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

Search for heavy neutrinos in kaon decays

PoS(TIPP2014)093. Performance study of the TOP counter with the 2 GeV/c positron beam at LEPS. K. Matsuoka, For the Belle II PID group

K + Physics at J-PARC

PoS(KAON)059. Giuseppe Ruggiero. Scuola Normale Superiore and INFN, Pisa, Italy

PoS(KAON13)012. R K Measurement with NA62 at CERN SPS. Giuseppe Ruggiero. CERN

Particle production vs. energy: how do simulation results match experimental measurements?

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Simulation study of scintillatorbased

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

Geant4 simulations of the lead fluoride calorimeter

Performance of the MCP-PMT for the Belle II TOP counter

Determination of parameters of cascade showers in the water calorimeter using 3D-distribution of Cherenkov light

Studies of Hadron Calorimeter

PoS(TIPP2014)033. Upgrade of MEG Liquid Xenon Calorimeter. Ryu SAWADA. ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Study of TileCal Sampling Fraction for Improvement of Monte-Carlo Data Reconstruction

EAS spectrum in thermal neutrons measured with PRISMA-32

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Dual-Readout Calorimetry with a Mo-Doped PbWO4 Electromagnetic Section

PoS(KAON09)046. Search for the K 0 L π0 ν ν at E391a Experiment

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

CALICE Test Beam Data and Hadronic Shower Models

Fig. 11. Signal distributions for 20 GeV * particles. Shown are the measured Éerenkov (a) and scintillation (b) signal distributions as well as the

PoS(DIS 2010)058. ATLAS Forward Detectors. Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington

Simulation and validation of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter response

High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter. F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

NICA/MPD Electromagnetic Calorimeter based on Multipixel Avalanche Photodetector

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

HIGH RESOLUTION HADRON CALORIMETRY

PANDA Muon System Prototype

Search for K + π + νν decay at NA62 experiment. Viacheslav Duk, University of Birmingham for the NA62 collaboration

Primary cosmic ray mass composition above 1 PeV as measured by the PRISMA-YBJ array

Kaon Identification at NA62. Institute of Physics Particle, Astroparticle, and Nuclear Physics groups Conference 2015

K2K and T2K experiments

A gas-filled calorimeter for high intensity beam environments

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

PoS(HIGH-pTLHC)022. The VHMPID detector in the ALICE experiment at LHC. Giacomo Volpe. INFN Bari, Italy

The First Large Application of MPPC: T2K Neutrino Beam Monitor INGRID

Status of the physics validation studies using Geant4 in ATLAS

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NEUTRON FIELDS PRODUCED IN PROTON REACTIONS WITH HEAVY TARGETS. Nuclear Physics Institute AS CR, Rez Czech Republic

COMET muon conversion experiment in J-PARC

1 Introduction. KOPIO charged-particle vetos. K - RARE Meeting (Frascati) May Purpose of CPV: veto Kl

PoS(Baldin ISHEPP XXII)065

New Hadroproduction results from the HARP/PS214 experiment at CERN PS

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Frascati Physics Series Vol. XVI (2000), pp PHYSICS AND DETECTORS FOR DANE { Frascati, Nov , 1999 BNL E787 results on K +! + Takahiro S

A beam line for schools

Validation and verification of Geant4 standard electromagnetic physics

A pattern recognition method for the RICH-based HMPID detector in ALICE

Radiation background simulation and verification at the LHC: Examples from the ATLAS experiment and its upgrades

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. First Physics at CMS

Quasi-Elastic Scattering in MINERvA

PoS(ICHEP2016)474. SoLid: Search for Oscillations with a Lithium-6 Detector at the SCK CEN BR2 reactor

The experiment at JINR: status and physics program

The Mainz Microtron MAMI

Overview of validations at LHC

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

Charged Current Quasielastic Analysis from MINERνA

Improving the Jet Reconstruction with the Particle Flow Method; an Introduction

Hands on LUNA: Detector Simulations with Geant4

Physics sources of noise in ring imaging Cherenkov detectors

Status of the CALICE analog calorimeter technological prototypes

Timing calibration of the LHAASO-KM2A electromagnetic particle detectors

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 26 Sep 2018

Fermilab FERMILAB-Conf-00/344-E CKM January 2001

R. Fantechi CERN and INFN Sezione di Pisa on behalf of the NA62 Collaboration

Study of ν τ production by measuring D s τ events in 400 GeV proton interactions: Test of lepton universality in neutrino charged-current interactions

PoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)008

Correlation Matrix Method for Pb/Scint Sampling Calorimeter

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS LIQUID ARGON FORWARD CALORIMETER IN BEAM TESTS

Precision neutron flux measurement with a neutron beam monitor

Identification of Central Production in the π + π π + π Channel at COMPASS

in NA64 at the CERN SPS. DSU-2018 June 2018 Annecy Search for a new X-boson and Dark Photons in NA64

Heavy ion fusion energy program in Russia

Puzzles of multiplicity

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 23 Oct 2017

Adam Para, Fermilab CALOR2010, IHEP, Beijing May 14, 2010 TOTAL ABSORPTION HOMOGENEOUS CALORIMETER WITH DUAL READOUT

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

Calculations of Neutron Yield and Gamma Rays Intensity by GEANT4

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

Super Bigbite Spectrometer (SBS) Status

CALICE scintillator HCAL

N U C L E O N. Satellite Mission. Present status.

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 7 Oct 1999

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 11 Mar 2010

Dario Barberis Evaluation of GEANT4 electromagnetic physics in ATLAS

Digital Imaging Calorimetry for Precision Electromagnetic and Hadronic Interaction Measurements

Transcription:

at IHEP (Protvino) U-70 proton synchrotron V. Bolotov Institute for Nuclear Research of RAS Moscow, Russia E-mail: bolotovvn@mail.ru G. Britvich State Research Center of Russia Institute for High Energy Physics Protvino, Russia E-mail: Gennady.Britvich@ihep.ru Yu. Guz State Research Center of Russia Institute for High Energy Physics Protvino, Russia E-mail: Iouri.Gouz@cern.ch A. Makarov Institute for Nuclear Research of RAS Moscow, Russia E-mail: mokar@himki.net 1 State Research Center of Russia Institute for High Energy Physics Protvino, Russia E-mail: Alexander.Ostankov@ihep.ru The project KOD has been recently started to carry out an experiment dedicated mainly to 0 0 observation and study of extremely rare decay K π νν~ at IHEP (Protvino) U-70 proton synchrotron. The R&D study for the most crucial parts of the experimental setup, namely the barrel Main Veto and the In-Beam-Veto calorimeter, has been considered as the main current task. The prototypes of these devices have been manufactured and tested. The results of these studies including preliminary data from the first test beam are presented. The main emphasis is put on the capability of the proposed In-Beam-Veto calorimeter to satisfy harsh experimental requirements: high efficient gamma detection in presence of 300 MHz neutron flux. A general status of the KOD project is also given. The work has been supported in a part by Russian foundation for basic research (grants # 06-02- 16065, 08-02-00808) and by the grant of the Russian Science Support Foundation. 2009 KAON International Conference KAON09 Tsukuba, Japan June 9-12, 2009 1 Speaker Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike icence. http://pos.sissa.it

1. Introduction Being the rare FCNC and purely CP-violating process the decay K 0 π 0 ν ~ ν [1] has been widely recognized as a golden mode which experimental detection will allow one to obtain the valuable information about CKM-matrix parameters and will be a probe of the existence of new physics beyond the SM. Recently a working groups from three scientific centers of Russian Federation IHEP (Protvino), JINR (Dubna) and INR (Moscow) established a collaboration, KOD, with the aim to carry out an experiment for searching the decay K 0 π 0 ν ~ ν at IHEP U-70 proton accelerator. The KOD Proposal has been published elsewhere [2] and briefly reported at the KAON07 Conference [3]. The Scientific Committees of IHEP, JINR and INR have clearly recognized the scientific importance of this experiment and approved the R&D phase with the aim to prepare the Technical Design Report. The talk given at KAON09 is dedicated to outline our efforts in developing of two most crucial parts of the experimental setup, the barrel Main Veto and the In- Beam-Veto calorimeter. 2. Experimental Setup Overview The strategy of proposed experiment is similar to one considered in KAMI (FNA) [4], Е391А (KEK) [5] and KOTO (J-Parc) [6] projects assuming a narrow beam approach and the searching of K π 0 ν ~ ν signal by signature of π 0 ( π 0 γγ) + nothing. 0 Table 1. Fig. 1. Schematic layout of the KOD setup. Fig. 1 shows the general layout of the KOD experimental setup along with some basic geometrical dimensions. The presented scale of distances has the origin at the target position. The main parameters of planned experiment are listed in the Table 1. 3. Main Veto High efficient veto-system surrounding decay volume is one of the most critical detectors. Being the largest device the Main Veto dominates in total cost estimation and the choice of a sampling structure seems to be natural. In ideal case detector should provide γ detection inefficiency on the level ~10 6 up to the smallest energy range, tens of MeV. That is in principle 2

possible for the γ energies above 1 GeV and requires calorimeter depth to be more than 18 Х 0 to avoid punch-through effect. For the smaller energy the abilities are limited by increased cross sections of photo-nuclear reactions and so called sampling effect which starts to be dominant below 100 MeV and may cause few percent inefficiency for tens MeV γ s [7]. To reduce influences of the latest effects it is important to use the finest calorimeter structure decreasing detection threshold below 1 MeV. We consider widely known shashlyk -type module as a basic veto cell. Its design is well developed at IHEP workshop allowing mass scale production of the finest calorimeter structure. The baseline module construction contains 300 pair layers of (300 μm Pb + 1mm Scint. plate) giving 15.9 Х 0 in the elementary cell with dimensions of (100 100 560) mm 3 [8]. Basing on this design several modified to our needs modules have been produced and tested. The specific features of the manufactured modules which have not been implemented in the experimental practice so far are listed below: stair-like shape allows one to avoid any possible gaps at the Main Veto by neighboring modules stacking. The light collection from scintillating plates is organized by means of mirrored and looped WS fibers as Fig. 2 shows; to provide the needed calorimeter depth (18 Х 0 ) the sampling fraction has been hardened by doubling lead thickness at the last third of the module. Such a solution may cause a nonlinearity of the calorimeter response at high energy γ detection what seems to be not significant for the veto-system. Mirrored Fibers Fiber oops Fig. 2. Manufactured modules of the Main Veto system. Manufactured modules have been tested at the secondary beams of the U-70 accelerating complex. The consequences of the implemented construction changes have been also the subjects of performed measurements. The main results of our studies are: the veto-module allows one to firmly detect m.i.p. giving 3.5 photoelectrons per single scintillating plate 1 ; light yield has been measured to be 20 000 visible part of the spectrum photons per 1 GeV γ-shower; recalculation to the visible (deposited in scintillator) energy gives 10 photoelectrons per 1 MeV; 1 at ordinary bi-alkaline photocathode. 3

photo-statistics is not significant factor to contribute to the energy resolution measured to be 1.5% for 8 GeV/c е +. This value well agrees with reported for given structure parameterization σ E /E 3%/ Е + 1% [8]; response nonlinearity for 8 GeV/c е + has been measured to be 3% with respect to the m.i.p. signal. This is due to the implemented sampling change at the end of the module; achieved working parameters allow one to set unprecedentedly low γ-detection threshold of ~100 kev (1 photoelectron). One of the important prototyping goals was also to demonstrate the manufacturing ability of self-supporting modules of such type and mass scale production technology development. 4. In-Beam-Veto In-Beam-Veto is small but important detector working in a very hard environment. About 0 0 0 18% of K π π decays in Fiducial Volume have at least 1 γ passing through the hole at ECal. Even in case of In-Beam-Veto positioning in 3 m downstairs from ECal still 2% of these decays will give 2 γ s (from one π 0 ) hitting this device. Such topology should be suppressed by factor 10 6 (inefficiency of ~10 3 for single γ). Fortunately in this case γ-spectrum is rather hard (Fig. 3) what gives a hope to achieve the goal. 0 0 0 Fig. 3. a) γ-spectra from decay K π π hitting Main Veto(1), the hole in FCal (2) and In-Beam-Veto (3) at the condition of 2 γ s hit Fcal ; 0 0 0 b) γ-spectra from decay K π π hitting In-Beam-Veto at the condition of 2 γ s hit Fcal + 2 γ s hit In-Beam-Veto (1) and sum energy of γ s at In-Beam-Veto in this case (2). (3-4) the same but at the extra condition of 2 γ s belong to one π 0. From other side huge neutron flux (~300 MHz) reduces γ-detection efficiency causing also over-veto effect. We intend to use spaghetti -like structure equipped both scintillator and pure acrylic fibers ( dual -readout calorimeter). Clear fibers are only sensitive to electromagnetic shower component giving e/h ration for hadron showers of ~5 [9]. Because of that the ration of Cherenkov light to scintillating one and its behavior in longitudinal and transverse directions are very different for γ s and hadrons induced showers. This feature which has been demonstrated by beam test studies [10] allows one to identify γ s in presence of superimposed neutron showers. 4.1 In-Beam-Veto Monte-Carlo A Monte-Carlo simulation study has been performed for the calorimeter structure corresponded to 200 identical slices arranged across the beam line. Each slice contains 0.3 mm Pb plate, layer of scintillating fibers 1 mm arranged in a ribbon-like structure and identical 4

layer of transparent acrylic 1 mm fibers. All fibers are grouping to organize the segmentations across and along the beam separately for each type of the fibers. The responses of such a calorimeter to γ and n have been modeled in the energy range of (0.25 20) GeV. Energy resolution for γ s has been found to be ~5.5%/ Е at scintillating light and ~7.6%/ Е at Cherenkov one. These values well agree with the experimental data reported by a number of the authors for the similar calorimetric structures (single light type readout scheme) [11, 12]. For γ s at the full energy range studied the ratio of scintillating and Cherenkov signals has been found to be R 0 = Ch/Scint 0.075 with proper Gaussian shape of σ R /R 0 8%/ Е. Dramatic differences in the behavior of R-parameter for neutrons are caused by suppressed hadron component of the showers in the case of Cherenkov signals detections (Fig. 4). a) b) Fig. 4. Correlation between R-parameter(horizontal axis) and registered scintillating signal (vertical axis, relative units). (a) for 8, 4, 2, 1, 0.25 GeV γ s; (b) for neutrons with uniform (0.5 10) GeV/c spectrum. The simplest selection criteria for γ-like showers, namely R-parameter lies in the range 3σ R (E Scint ), suppress neutron component of the beam (n misidentified as a γ) by two of R 0 ± order of magnitude, i.e. up to the level of 3 MHz. Even assuming to work with time window of 10 ns it will give 2% acceptance lost due to over-veto effect. Table 2 represents detection inefficiencies for single γ s achieved at such algorithm as well as the same ones obtained at superposition of given γ-shower and n-shower simulated according to the know beam spectrum. E γ, GeV 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 Nonefficiency 2 1. 3 10 3 3. 5 10 10 6 10 4 5 10 4 5 10 4 Nonefficiency in presens of n (beam spectrum) 3.5 10 2 1.1 10 2 3 3. 5 10 10 3 6 10 4 6 10 4 Table 2. The results of these brief studies are quite promising. One may expect much better detector performances using available information about transversal and longitudinal distributions of the Cherenkov and scintillating lights in the showers. 4.2 In-Beam-Veto Prototyping On the base of the Monte-Carlo results In-Beam-Veto calorimeter prototype has been designed and manufactured. Produced calorimeter structure is similar to one described in the Monte-Carlo section and constitutes 100 identical slices of (0.3 mm Pb + 1 mm acrylic fibers + 1.5 mm scintillator) arranged across the beam line. To provide the segmentation the acrylic fibers, 17 across the beam and 20 along the beam, are grouped together giving a light spot of ~ 20 mm on the attached photodetector. For simplicity reason the layers of scintillating fibers have been replaced by 1.5 mm thick scintillating bars with dimensions across the beam of 17 mm. Scintillating light is collected by mean of single WS fiber embedded inside the bar 5

body. WS fibers from 20 scintillating bars located along the beam are joined together and attached to separate photodetector. This structure together with Pb sheets forms the elementary detecting cell with dual readout (Fig. 5a) with dimensions of (17 220 60) mm 3. In-Beam-Veto calorimeter prototype contains 25 elementary cells grouped in the matrix (5 5) with full dimensions (in terms of electromagnetic shower developing) of (1R M 2R M 7.5X 0 ). a) Fig. 5. In-Beam-Veto calorimeter prototype. b) c) In-Beam-Veto calorimeter prototype has be en preliminary tested at the secondary beams of the U-70 accelerating complex. The purpose of these studies was to measure the basis characteristics of the devise like light yields, uniformity, angular dependence etc. The main results of our preliminary tests are: nonuniformity of the device response to the m.i.p. signal has been measured to be better than ±5% in the both transversal to the beam line directions; Cherenkov light yield from single detecting cell (20 acrylic layers) corresponds to 10 photoelectrons from m.i.p. signal at incident angle of 45 о ; scintillating light yield with consequent WS readout exceeds Cherenkov one by factor of 10; expected from Monte-Carlo studies the angular dependence for m.i.p. signals has been measured with the maximum around 45 о. The width of the measured distribution corresponds to the numeric aperture of the acrylic fibers used; the absence of angular dependence for scintillating light has been measured as expected. The results of these preliminary tests shell allow us to tune Monte-Carlo modeling parameters to the real data, to develop additional criteria for n s suppression and perhaps to make the changes in the prototype construction for the final beam tests. For the final prove of the proposed device capabilities to satisfy harsh experimental requirements we intend to have dedicated beam run at the secondary positive beam with well know and on-line monitored particle composition, (e +, p, K +, π + ). 5. Conclusion We present the results of R&D work for two crucial parts of the KOD experimental setup. The report doesn t cover all efforts of the KOD collaboration towards preparation of the Technical Design Report for future experiment. The authors are grateful to all members of the Collaboration for the valuable help and many useful discussions. This work has been supported by Russian foundation for basic research (grants # 06-02- 16065, 08-02-00808) and by the grant of the Russian Science Support Foundation. 6

References [1]. ittenberg, Phys. Rev., D39, 3322 (1989). [2] G. I. Britvich et al., Search for the rare deca y K 0 π 0 ν ~ ν at the IHEP U-70 accelerator, IHEP Preprint 2007-8 (in Russian), http://dbs erv.ihep.su/~pubs/prep2007/07-08-w.htm. [3], V. Bolotov (for the KOD Colla boration), A proposal to measure the rare 0 π 0 ν ~ K ν decay at IHEP (Protvino) 70 GeV proton accelerator, talk given at KAON07 International Conference, INFN, Rome, Italy, May 2007; in proceedings of KAON07 conference PoS(KAON)063 0 [4] KAMI Collaboration, A Proposal for a Precision Measurement of the Decay K 0 π ν ~ ν and Other Rare Processes at Fermilab Using The Main Injector KAMI, April 2, 2001, http://ktev.fnal.gov/public/kami/kami.html. [5] T. Inagaki et al., KEK-E391 Proposal 1996, KEK-Internal 96-13 (1996); K. Abe et al., KEK Preprint 2000-89 (2000). [6] Proposal for K 0 π 0 ν ~ ν Experiment at J-Parc, April 28, 2006, P14, http://j-parc.jp/nuclpart/proposal_0606_e.html. [7] S. Ajimura et al., Nucl. Instr. And Meth., A435 (1999) 408. [8] G. S. Atoian et al., Nucl. Instr. And Meth., A531 (2004) 467. [9] N. Akchurin et al., Nucl. Instr. And Meth., A399 (1997) 202. [10] N. Akchurin et al., Nucl. Instr. And Meth., A536 (2005) 29; A548 (2005) 336. [11] D. Babusci et al., Nucl. Instr. And Meth., A332 (1993) 444. [12] P. Gorodetzky et al., Nucl. Instr. And Meth., A361 (1995) 161. 7