Factors Governing Successful Tidal Wetland Mitigation. Walter I. Priest, III Wetland Design and Restoration ASWM Webinar 16 July 2018

Similar documents
PLANT COMMUNITY COMPOSITION OF THE BUCKTOWN CREATED MARSH:

Taunton River Salt Marsh Assessment Results from 2014 season

CAPS/SLAM: Salt Marsh Assessment Inner Marsh Version May 2012

Types of Wetlands. Tidal Systems

Subtidal permanently flooded with tidal water. Irregularly exposed surface exposed by tides less often than daily

Pablo Bay in Sonoma, Solano, and Napa Counties. It is owned and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Second Annual Monitoring Report Tidal Wetland Restoration 159 Long Neck Point Road, Darien, CT NAE

Coastal Tidal Marshes

SOP 1: Vegetation Monitoring in Salt Marshes using Rapid Assessment Method

Coastal Ecosystems: Salt Marshes and Mangroves. Marine Biology Dr. Ouida Meier

Third Annual Monitoring Report Tidal Wetland Restoration 159 Long Neck Point Road, Darien, CT NAE

Assess the Potential for Accumulation of Toxic Trace Elements in Biota near Burton Island Ash Disposal Site Indian River Bay, Delaware

Delaware Estuary Living Shoreline Initiative. David Bushek, Danielle Kreeger, Laura Whalen, Joshua Moody, Angela Padeletti

4.2 Tidal Wetlands. Phragmites Australis

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

Woodstock, Route 26 Stream Relocation Project

COASTAL WETLAND ENGINEERING: DESIGNING FOR FUNCTION, CASE STUDIES, AND MODELING TOOLS

Gulf Research Reports

Technical Report: Rhode Island Salt Marsh Habitat Mapping Project

Assessment. Assessment

Shoreline and Climate Change Adaptation Alternatives for The Letter Parcel, Bolinas Lagoon

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Generalized Conceptual Models Wetlands Regional Monitoring Program Compiled for the PEEIR

Effect of wrack accumulation on salt marsh vegetation, Baruch Institute, Georgetown County, South Carolina

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

High Resolution Numerical Models of Tidal Marshes in the Delaware Bay

3. MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION

Spatial Distribution of Salt Marsh Vegetation Cover and Salinity Regimes in Response to Mosquito Ditching

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

I. Tidal Salt Marshes (TSMs)

Mapping Predicted Tidal Exposure Durations Using a MLLW-Referenced LiDAR Terrain Model

USGS efforts to model sea-level rise impact to tidal marshes along the California coast.

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Relatively little hard substrate occurs naturally in the

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Tidal Wetland Vegetation

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR VERIFICATION OF CORPS JURISDICTION

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Implementing the NERR Sentinel Sites Program at the Narragansett Bay Research Reserve to Track Salt Marsh Responses to Climate Change Stessors

Research Background: Researcher Sam Bond taking Sediment Elevation Table (SET) measurements in the marsh. A view of salt marsh hay growing in a marsh

Use of Bioengineering Techniques for Revegetation of Riparian Areas: Colomac Mine Remediation Project, NWT

Four Mile Run Levee Corridor Stream Restoration

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Wetland Sediment Dynamics at Crissy Field Marsh Annual Report

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Adjacent Sewage Treatment Plant

Wetland Definition Diagram

Minimum Standards for Wetland Delineations

Salt Marsh Role Play

Tidal Marshes. 1) Inundated by twice daily tides to monthly lunar tides. 2) Exposed to varying salt concentrations in water column (0 to 35ppt).

Habitat Monitoring Update Hudson River CAG November 16, 2017

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

Wetlands Ecology. By Pam Mason, Marine Scientist, Wetlands Program Modified by Dr. William Roberts, Education Coordinator

Mussel Powered Living Shorelines for Salt Marsh Erosion Control

Annual transport rates at two locations on the fore-slope.

Implementing a Project with 319 Funds: The Spring Brook Meander Project. Leslie A. Berns

Bob Van Dolah. Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

AQUATIC RESOURCES DELINEATION REFRESHER

Invasion of San Francisco Bay By Smooth Cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora: A Forecast of Geomorphic Effects On the Intertidal Zone

Defining the Limit of Regulated Areas. C.1 Defining the River or Stream Flood Hazard 138. C.2 Defining the River or Stream Erosion Hazard 139

Little Swan Lake. Dam Inspection & Siltation Study Prepared By: William Klingner, P.E., CFM October 28, 2018

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

THIN-LAYER PLACEMENT OF DREDGE MATERIAL FOR MARSH NOURISHMENT, RESOTRATION, AND RESPONSE TO SEA LEVEL RISE

3.7 VISUAL RESOURCES Environmental Setting

Sentinel Site Development of a Major Salt Marsh System in the Mid-Atlantic Region (USA)

Topography, hydrology and Spartina alterniflora growth range for restored salt marsh Elders Point East, Jamaica Bay, New York.

Appendix I. Dredged Volume Estimates. Draft Contractor Document: Subject to Continuing Agency Review

Characterizing Tidal Inundation of Wetlands in the Murderkill Estuary (Kent County, DE)

Nutrient and Carbon Sequestration by Salt Marsh Plants in the Face of Eutrophication and Sea Level Rise

Importing Plant Stock for Wetland Restoration and Creation: Maintaining Genetic Diversity and Integrity

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE DEGRADATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN RIVER LIKODRA WATERSHED

Waterborne Environmental, Inc., Leesburg, VA, USA 2. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, North America 3. Syngenta Crop Protection, Int.

Overview Rationale for Study

Salt Marsh Habitat Restoration Plan (Revision #3)

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Best Management Practices for Coldwater Fisheries Enhancement and Restoration

Sediment Management in the Coastal Bays

-- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model

Ms. A. Mormando's Class *

Introduction to the Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Classification System

York River Tidal Marshes

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

Delaware Bay Dikes Repair and Prevention Project Preliminary Design for New Castle Dikes

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin Includes Bogue Sound and the Newport River

exposed has to the this soil lowest water salinity. However in the fall, following a lot of Underground

10/24/2017. Determining Location. Where in the World are We Geodetically Speaking. Meades Ranch

Columbia Estuary Province

Subcommittee on Sedimentation Draft Sediment Analysis Guidelines for Dam Removal

9 th INTECOL Orlando, Florida June 7, 2012

ΛTKINS. Applications of Regional Sediment Management Concepts in Texas Estuarine Restoration Projects. Riparian Workshop Fort Worth, October 17, 2012

Assessing marsh response from sea-level rise applying local site conditions: Humboldt Bay wetlands

Steven Noble MDEQ - WRD Enbridge Response Unit

Sediment Distribution and Characteristics

In-channel coarse sediment trap Best Management Practice

Transcription:

Factors Governing Successful Tidal Wetland Mitigation Walter I. Priest, III Wetland Design and Restoration ASWM Webinar 16 July 2018

Goals and Objectives Successful Tidal Wetland Mitigation Primary production and detrital export Fish, shellfish and wildlife habitat Water quality enhancement Shoreline erosion protection Flood buffering

Site Selection No contamination Diminished ecological value Access to tidal hydrology No plumbing Landscape position Targets of opportunity Connection to watershed Adjacent habitats forest or wetlands Wildlife corridors Is the proposal realistic for the site?

Mitigation Design Tidal Hydrology Tide range Salinity Channel size and configuration Drainage Perimeter ditches

New Mill Creek Tidal Wetland Mitigation Bank

Mitigation Design Elevation The Critical Element Topographic survey Datum NAVD88 Geodetic datum NOAA Mean low water Tidal epoch Side slopes Transition areas Biological bench marks Habitat complexity - microtopography

Tidal Datums Tidal datum information available at: https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/stations.html?type=bench+ Mark+Data+Sheets

Tidal Datum Conversion

Tidal Epoch

Biological Bench Mark BIOLOGICAL BENCH MARK FORM Site: Libertyville Wetland Bank Date: 17-Aug-05 Investigator: W. I. Priest Datum: NAVD 88 Lower Limit Spartina alterniflora Upper Limit Spartina alternflora Lower Limit Phragmites australis Upper Limit Phragmites australis Juncus roemarianus Saltbush Misc. Species Note 1.12 2.45 2.45 2.73 3.8 0.65 Creek bottom 0.93 2.8 2.17 2.48 3.86 1.36 Ditch bottom 0.8 2.77 2.1 2.83 3.61 2.58 Panne 0.91 2.65 2.65 3.03 3.59 3.3 Existing Grade 0.82 2.81 2.82 3.43 2.93 3.46 1.24 3.04 2.83 2.9 2.81 S.r. 2.93 2.97 2.7 2.86 S.cyno. 2.89 3.03 3.04 D.s. 2.9 3.22 D.s. Mean 0.97 2.79 2.66 2.80 3.66 Max 1.24 3.04 3.03 3.03 3.86 Min 0.80 2.45 2.10 2.48 3.46 N 6 8 9 7 5 Ave Dev 0.14 0.13 0.28 0.14 0.13 Std Dev 0.17 0.18 0.34 0.18 0.16

Mitigation Design Plants Reflection of Hydrology Planting zones Species Habitat complexity Invasive Species Phragmites australis Spray and remove during construction Mean high water limit Perimeter ditches

Wetlands Zonation- Virginia Model 3 Upper limit of tidal wetlands High marsh Spartina patens 2 1 0 Mean high water Mean tide level Mean low water Low Marsh Spartina alterniflora Non-vegetated wetlands

Table 9. Zonation and salinity levels for common wetland plants. Plant Selection Species Inundation Zone Salinity Range Spartina alterniflora MTL MHW 5 30 ppt Spartina patens MHW ULW 5 30 ppt Spartina cynosuroides MHW ULW 0 5 ppt Distichlis spicata MHW ULW 10 30 ppt Scirpus pungens MHW ULW 0 15 ppt Juncus roemarianus above MHW 10 25 ppt Iva frutescens near ULW 5 30 ppt Baccharis halimifolia near ULW 0 30 ppt Panicum virgatum above ULW 0 25 ppt

Soils Composition at planting elevations Over excavation and backfill? Sand is best for planting and growth Avoid heavy clay and peat Organic matter will increase over time Fine-grained sediment deposition Benthic algal mats

Soil at depth

Success Criteria As-built survey Tidal inundation Tide staff Plant survival First year Plant cover 70% Soil development

Monitoring Vegetation Early fall peak production Random m 2 quadrats Percent cover by species Percent no cover Quadrat elevation Algal mat Volunteer species Invasive species occurrence Reference area data

Monitoring Soils Algal mats Sediment accumulation Animals Macrobenthic invertebrates Wildlife Photographic stations Perimeter locations that indicate representative views of site development Physiography Signs of excessive erosion or deposition Tide staff elevations as necessary

Channel Monitoring Fishes Qualitative Evaluation Block net at high tide in the Fall Count and measure each species Trophic groups Forage fishes Juvenile nursery species Piscivorous Diversity 1 3 species: Fair 4 7 species: Good 8 - >10 species: Excellent

Table 6. Libertyville fish utilization block net data. 25-Sep-07 Length (mm) Common Name Scientific Name Number Mean Max Min Mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus 3005 61 89 23 Striped killifish Fundulus majalis 202 84 118 49 Sheepshead minnow Cyprinodon variegatus 167 51 60 40 Blue crab Callinectes sapidus 27 62 140 36 Spot Leiostomus xanthurus 15 147 178 125 Atlantic silverside Menidia menidia 4 75 78 68 White perch Morone americana 4 99 115 83

Monitoring Report Project description Sampling design quadrat locations Presentation of data Analysis Trajectory Problem areas Plant survival Inundation or drainage issues Invasive species Recommendations Remedial planting Correct elevation issues Invasive species control

Table 1. Libertyville Wetland Mitigation Bank Vegetation Survey Data Sampling Date 24-Sep-10 Quadrat# No Cover Spartina alterniflor a Spartina patens Distichlis spicata % Cover Salicorni a europea Aster sp. Juncus Atriplex patula Total cover 1 15 85 85 2 20 80 80 3 35 65 65 4 15 85 85 5 24 75 1 76 6 24 75 1 76 7 20 30 45 5 80 8 29 70 1 71 9 34 20 30 1 15 66 10 22 75 3 78 11 30 60 10 70 12 60 40 40 13 25 75 75 14 20 80 80 15 25 75 75 16 20 80 80 17 30 68 10 2 80 18 20 80 80 19 20 80 80 20 15 85 85 21 20 80 80 22 15 85 85 23 30 70 70 24 30 68 2 70 25 35 65 65 26 35 65 65 27 30 70 70 28 35 65 65 29 55 45 45 30 30 45 25 70 31 25 75 75 32 30 70 70 33 30 70 70 34 5 20 75 95 Mean 26.71 66.94 75.00 28.33 1.50 3.20 7.33 25.00 73.59 N 34.00 34.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 34.00 Max 60.00 85.00 75.00 45.00 2.00 10.00 15.00 25.00 95.00 Min 5.00 20.00 75.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 25.00 40.00 Ave. Dev. 7.69 12.73 0.00 12.22 0.50 2.72 5.11 0.00 7.75

Percent Cover Libertyville % Cover - 2010 100 90 80 70 62.34 69.28 73.59 60 50 40 44.50 % Cover 30 20 10 11.84 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Questions? Photo credit: John Evans, Norfolk Corps