An Optical Survey for Space Debris on Highly Eccentric MEO Orbits

Similar documents
An Optical Survey for Space Debris on Highly Eccentric MEO Orbits

Optical Surveys for Space Debris in MEO

OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS OF BRIZ-M FRAGMENTS IN GEO

Swiss Contributions to a Better Understanding of the Space Debris Environment

IAC-17-F Attitude State Evolution of Space Debris Determined from Optical Light Curve Observations

AIUB EFFORTS TO SURVEY, TRACK, AND CHARACTERIZE SMALL-SIZE OBJECTS AT HIGH ALTITUDES

3. The process of orbit determination and improvement

CHALLENGES RELATED TO DISCOVERY, FOLLOW-UP, AND STUDY OF SMALL HIGH AREA-TO-MASS RATIO OBJECTS AT GEO

EXTENSIVE LIGHT CURVE DATABASE OF ASTRONOMICAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BERN

2 INTRODUCTION 3 ORBIT DETERMINATION

Small telescopes and their application in space debris research and SST

Improved Space Object Orbit Determination Using CMOS Detectors. J. Silha 1,2

Tailoring the Observation Scenarios and Data Processing Techniques for Supporting Conjunction Event Assessments

CONCLUSIONS FROM ESA SPACE DEBRIS TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS ON SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT MODELLING

ANALYSIS OF THE LONG-TERM AREA-TO-MASS RATIO VARIATION OF SPACE DEBRIS

IAC-10-A PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH AMR DEBRIS BY OPTICAL REFLECTANCE SPECTROMETRY

Optical Tracking and Characterization of Space Objects

IAC-06-B6.1.1 PERFORMANCE OF A PROPOSED INSTRUMENT FOR SPACE-BASED OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS OF SPACE DEBRIS

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

PROPERTIES OF THE HIGH AREA-TO-MASS RATIO SPACE DEBRIS POPULATION IN GEO

Contribution of ISON and KIAM space debris. space

Major fragmentation of Atlas 5 Centaur upper stage B (SSN #40209)

CORRELATION OF SPACE DEBRIS OBSERVATIONS BY THE VIRTUAL DEBRIS ALGORITHM

Comparison of different Methods of Ephemeris Retrieval for Correlation of Observations of Space Debris Objects

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Quantifying Space Environment Interactions with Debris Objects using Observation Data Fusion Techniques

Exhaustive strategy for optical survey of geosynchronous region using TAROT telescopes

Long-Term Evolution of High Earth Orbits: Effects of Direct Solar Radiation Pressure and Comparison of Trajectory Propagators

Short-Arc Correlation and Initial Orbit Determination For Space-Based Observations

Keywords: Space Debris, Telescope Network, Geostationary Ring. 1. General Specifications Location

Optical Studies of Space Debris at GEO - Survey and Follow-up with Two Telescopes

Design of a Radar Based Space Situational Awareness System

Realistic Sensor Tasking Strategies

Chapter 3 Cycles of the Moon

ON A NEW VERSION OF THE ORBIT DETERMINATION METHOD

Satellite Communications

Celestial Mechanics and Satellite Orbits

COMPARISON OF ANGLES ONLY INITIAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ALGORITHMS FOR SPACE DEBRIS CATALOGUING

Status of the Gravitational Redshift Test with Eccentric Galileo Satellites

Creating Satellite Orbits

GEO protected region: ISON capabilities to provide informational support for tasks of spacecraft flight safety and space debris removal

Arranging Observations of Faint Debris with ISON Optical Network

Satellite meteorology

Assessment and Categorization of TLE Orbit Errors for the US SSN Catalogue

Estimating the Error in Statistical HAMR Object Populations Resulting from Simplified Radiation Pressure Modeling

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

IAC-10.A Carolin Früh. 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland, Thomas Schildknecht 1

EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE ON REAL SITUATION AT HIGH NEAR-EARTH ORBITS

Orbital Debris Observation via Laser Illuminated Optical Measurement Techniques

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Modeling Updates

Comparison of Orbital and Physical Characteristics of Bright and Faint GEO Objects

Astrophysics/Astronomy Problems

Lecture Module 2: Spherical Geometry, Various Axes Systems

EXAM #2. ANSWERS ASTR , Spring 2008

J. G. Miller (The MITRE Corporation), W. G. Schick (ITT Industries, Systems Division)

Topics for Today s Class. The Phases of the Moon. Why we see Phases of Moon. PHYS 1403 Stars and Galaxies

Fundamentals of Satellite technology

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR EXPERT COORDINATION CENTRES SUPPORTING OPTICAL AND SLR OBSERVATIONS IN A SST SYSTEM

The Flammarion engraving by an unknown artist, first documented in Camille Flammarion's 1888 book L'atmosphère: météorologie populaire.

on space debris objects obtained by the

A SIMULATION OF THE MOTION OF AN EARTH BOUND SATELLITE

Introduction to Satellite Orbits

The Characteristics and Consequences of the Break-up of the Fengyun-1C Spacecraft

SECTION 9 ORBIT DATA - LAUNCH TRAJECTORY

ERS-2 and ENVISAT orbit control Current and future strategy The impact on the interferometric baseline

a. exactly 360 b. less than 360 c. more than 360 On Figure 1, draw the Earth the next day and justify your answer above.

Section 13. Orbit Perturbation. Orbit Perturbation. Atmospheric Drag. Orbit Lifetime

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

THE ROLE OF IMPACTS AND MOMENTUM TRANSFER FOR THE EVOLUTION OF ENVISAT S ATTITUDE STATE

HIGH EFFICIENCY ROBOTIC OPTICAL TRACKING OF SPACE DEBRIS FROM PST2 TELESCOPE IN ARIZONA

SMARTnet: First Experience of Setting Up a Telescope System to Survey the Geostationary Ring ,

Development of Laser Measurement to Space Debris at Shanghai SLR Station

Short-arc tracklet association for geostationary objects

TUNDRA DISPOSAL ORBIT STUDY

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class.

Interannual variation of MODIS NDVI in Lake Taihu and its relation to climate in submerged macrophyte region

NAVIGATION & MISSION DESIGN BRANCH

USING CONJUNCTION ANALYSIS METHODS FOR MANOEUVRE DETECTION

Sensor Tasking for Detection and Custody of HAMR Objects

IAC-14-A6.7.5 SPACE-BASED SPACE SURVEILLANCE AND TRACKING DEMONSTRATOR: MISSION AND SYSTEM DESIGN

Space Debris Activities in India

COLLISION AVOIDANCE ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION MEASURES FOR CONTROLLED GEO/GSO SPACECRAFTS WITH ORBITAL DEBRIS

The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K /Breeze M

Comparison of ENVISAT s attitude simulation and real optical and SLR observations in order to refine the satellite attitude model

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE-TRICHY QUESTION BANK UNIT I PART A

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIA ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

North Korea Satellite Launch

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

ORBITAL SOLUTIONS TO LEO-TO-LEO ANGLES-ONLY VERY- SHORT-ARC TRACKS

PW-Sat two years on orbit.

Lecture 1d: Satellite Orbits

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE DE-ORBITING PRACTICES IN THE MEO REGION

Space Situational Awareness Center, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon , Korea 2

1.4j interpret simple shadow stick data to determine local noon and observer s longitude

No End of Push-broom Operations

Galileo gravitational Redshift test with Eccentric satellites (GREAT)

8 Sateph User s manual

Results and Analyses of Debris Tracking from Mt Stromlo

SST ANALYSIS TOOL (SSTAN) SUPPORTING SPACE SURVEILLANCE AND TRACKING (SST) SERVICES ASSESSMENT

Transcription:

An Optical Survey for Space Debris on Highly Eccentric MEO Orbits T. Schildknecht, J. Silha, A. Hinze, A. Vananti Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland T. Flohrer source: http://boris.unibe.ch/44510/ downloaded: 13.3.2017 Space Debris Office, ESA/ESOC, Germany 62 nd Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2013, September 10. 12., 2013, Stuttgart, Germany Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Current TLE Population 3. Survey Strategies 4. Observations and Results 5. Conclusion Slide 2 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Main Objectives Background: Fragmentation events (including deliberate events) in highly-eccentric MEO, in particular in Molniyatype orbits, are known. Objectives: Develop observation strategies and make a comparative analyses Demonstrate the feasibility and performance of the proposed observation strategies through an experimental observation campaign Build-up and maintain a temporal catalogue Slide 3 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

TLE Molniya Population Selection criteria 60 < i < 67 0.5 < e < 0.8 20000km < a < 30000km Objects Quantity MOLNIYA satellites 41 MERIDIAN satellites 4 Rocket bodies 73 Others 53 TOTAL 171 USSTRATCOM catalogue to January 2012 Slide 4 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Current Population Node distributed over the whole range More objects between 80 and 160 2 groups e < 0.65 Similar launch dates perigee < 180 deg Slide 5 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Current Population i > 65 -> e < 0.65 Most objects distributed around 63.4 deg Cover whole range Perigee for most of the objects around 270 deg Slide 6 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Evolution over 10 Years Evolution over 20 years green: e < 0.65 Similar distribution of orbital elements Node drift -0.1 to -0.2 per day -> 36 /year Slide 7 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

MEO Observation Strategies Angular velocities (topocentric, OGS) V min = 5-10 arcs/s -> apogee Slide 8 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

MEO Observation Strategies Phase angles (topocentric, OGS) Slide 9 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

MEO Observation Strategies Where to look? Geocentric passes; OGS, one night Slide 10 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Observations First observations in December 2012 at OGS, 1-m Zeiss telescope, 0.7x0.7 square degrees Survey fields in anti-sun direction (right ascension) First test field all known TLE objects were found no uncorrelated objects found Survey and follow-up observations were performed In January 3 successful nights of observations In February 3 successful nights of observations In April 3 successful nights of observations In July 3 successful nights of observations In August 1 night Follow-up observations performed with ZIMLAT Slide 11 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Survey strategy with 3 fields per month displaced by 10 in right ascension Slide 12 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Survey Fields 13 nights -> 13 fields ΔRA = 10deg Each survey = 11 min 11-42 surveys/night 257 surveys (~47.1h) 30 uncorr. objects found (~0.6 objects/hour) Follow-up observations of 25 objects performed 5 objects still active Slide 13 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Uncorrelated Molniya Molniya objects (Jan 2013 Aug 2013) E13009A A/M ~ 0.3 m²/kg E13039A A/M ~ 0.001 m²/kg Slide 14 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Uncorrelated Molniya Molniya objects (Jan 2013 Aug 2013) Slide 15 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Uncorrelated Molniya Molniya objects (Jan 2013 Aug 2013) Slide 16 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Uncorrelated Molniya Eccentricity vs Mean Motion (Jan 2002 - Mar 2013; elliptical orbits) Eccentricity 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Mean Motion UCT: 1241 CT: 184 uncorrelated correlated uncorr. Molniya vapo = 15"/s vapo = 10.5"/s vapo = 7.5"/s vapo = 5"/s Slide 17 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

e vs i Molniya objects (Jan 2013 Aug 2013) + TLE + Discovered Slide 18 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Perigee vs Node Molniya objects (Jan 2013 Aug2013) + TLE + Discovered Slide 19 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Brightness Variation Light Curve 13039A 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Seconds past 20130413 20:45:33 Slide 20 Astronomical Institute University of Bern Magnitude

Brightness variation Slide 21 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Conclusions Efficient observation scenarios for eccentric MEO orbits (particularly Molniya) were developed and their performance assessed Test observations (13 nights) 30 uncorrelated objects found (~0.6 objects/hour) Objects highly variable in brightness light curves acquired High percentage of higher A/M objects, also HAMR objects Objects often too faint to follow up with ZIMLAT, only 5 objects still in catalogue Observation campaign is ongoing Slide 22 Astronomical Institute University of Bern

Future work Statistical evaluation to follow (feedback to models) Comparison with models by using ESA PROOF-2009 program ESA MASTER statistical population comparison with real observations The shows and no-shows analysis with TLE population Slide 23 Astronomical Institute University of Bern