Results of the Geothermal Energy Project Hamburg-Allermoehe

Similar documents
Geothermal power generation in the Upper Rhine Valley The Project Offenbach/Pfalz

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

WAMUNYU EDWARD MUREITHI I13/2358/2007

MINERALOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF CANADA CLAYS AND THE RESOURCE GEOLOGIST

The effect of CO 2 -fluid-rock interactions on the porosity and permeability of calcite-bearing sandstone

Research Article. Experimental Analysis of Laser Drilling Impacts on Rock Properties

A Regional Diagenetic and Petrophysical Model for the Montney Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin*

EGS Sistemi Geotermici Potenziati

Integrating Geomechanics and Reservoir Characterization Examples from Canadian Shale Plays

Seismic mapping of the Utsira Formation. Petrophysical interpretations and fracture gradient estimates.

Microscopic and X-ray fluorescence researches on sandstone from Shahejie Formation, China

RESULTS OF STIMULATION TREATMENTS AT THE GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH WELLS IN GROß SCHÖNEBECK/GERMANY

Rock Physics Perturbational Modeling: Carbonate case study, an intracratonic basin Northwest/Saharan Africa

COMPLEMENTARY METHODS FOR CHARACTERISING SLICK ROCK AEOLIAN SANDSTONE

An Integrated Petrophysical Approach for Shale Gas Reservoirs

Technology of Production from Shale

Formation Evaluation: Logs and cores

Minerals and Rocks Chapter 20

TRUST. Figure 1: Location of the shallow seismic wells, the injection well (H18A) and the monitoring well (H18B).

Sedimentary Rocks, our most Valuable Rocks. Or, what you will probably find when you are outdoors exploring.

Belgian Geological data for deep geothermal Energy

Why Injection in a Geothermal Sediment Reservoir Causes Seismicity in Crystalline Basement It is not just Hydraulics

Emily and Megan. Earth System Science. Elements of Earth by weight. Crust Elements, by weight. Minerals. Made of atoms Earth is mostly iron, by weight

SMALL ANGLE NEUTRON SCATTERING ANALYSIS OF POROUS RESERVOIR ROCKS

HOW. HOW vehicle mounted units portable units also available. HOW, WHEN & WHY to Geophysically Log in S.I.?

Exploration / Appraisal of Shales. Petrophysics Technical Manager Unconventional Resources

Comparison of rock pore space based on X-ray computed microtomography (micro-ct) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data.

Ensign, Unravelling the Enigma DEVEX 2016

GEOLOGICAL LOG INTERPRETATION TUTORIAL

ROCK PHYSICS DIAGNOSTICS OF NORTH SEA SANDS: LINK BETWEEN MICROSTRUCTURE AND SEISMIC PROPERTIES ABSTRACT

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 59 (2014 )

The INTERREG project GeORG: 3D-modeling of complex tectonic structures for assessing geopotentials in the Upper Rhine Graben

WELL PATH DESIGN AND STIMULATION TREATMENTS AT THE GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH WELL GTGRSK4/05 IN GROß SCHÖNEBECK

North Dakota Geological Survey

ROCK PROPERTY MAPPING FOR IMPROVED PLANNING OF GEOTHERMAL INSTALLATIONS

Introduction to Formation Evaluation Abiodun Matthew Amao

Geophysical exploration methods at European sites

Exploration, Drilling & Production

Borehole Seismic Monitoring of Injected CO 2 at the Frio Site

Petrophysics Designed to Honour Core Duvernay & Triassic

Shale Gas:- What is it?, Where is it? How can we get it and when? Professor Peter Styles, Applied and Environmental Geophysics Research Group

The Ketzin Test Site (former CO 2 Sink-project)

High-resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of the Glauconitic Sandstone, Upper Mannville C Pool, Cessford Field: a Record of Evolving Accommodation

Role of pore scale heterogeneities on the localization of dissolution and precipitation reactions

11/22/2010. Groundwater in Unconsolidated Deposits. Alluvial (fluvial) deposits. - consist of gravel, sand, silt and clay

GeoFlex. Quantitative cuttings analysis and imaging service

Micro-Structural Rock Modeling: Methodology and Application in Formation Evaluation

Stochastic Modeling & Petrophysical Analysis of Unconventional Shales: Spraberry-Wolfcamp Example

Shale Diagenesis and Permeability: Examples from the Barnett Shale and the Marcellus Formation*

Drill Cuttings Analysis: How to Determine the Geology of a Formation and Reservoir

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

MEASUREMENT OF HYDRAULICALLY ACTIVATED SUBSURFACE FRACTURE SYSTEM IN GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR BY USING ACOUSTIC EMISSION MULTIPLET-CLUSTERING ANALYSIS

Modeling pressure response into a fractured zone of Precambrian basement to understand deep induced-earthquake hypocenters from shallow injection

Prof. Stephen A. Nelson EENS 111. Groundwater

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 6. Basic Rock Classification and Engineering Considerations (West, Chs. 2, 3, 4, 5)

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

Chapter 6 Sedimentary and Metamorphic Rock

Permeability in deep-seated granitic rocks: lessons learnt from deep geothermal boreholes in the Upper Rhine Graben (URG)

Fault Rocks. EARS5136 slide 1

2005 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition; September, 2005; Paris, France

ECS Elemental Capture Spectroscopy Sonde. Fast, accurate lithology evaluation

Finding Large Capacity Groundwater Supplies for Irrigation

Minerals By Patti Hutchison

Geological Classification of Seismic-Inversion Data in the Doba Basin of Chad*

Crust Elements. Elements of Earth. Minerals. Crystals. Interconnected Rocks and minerals Interior processes Erosion and deposition Water and air

8 th Earth Science Chapter 4 Rocks Name Section 1 The Rock Cycle:

PART I Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy: History and Potential of the Newest and Largest Renewable Energy Resource

Hijiori HDR Reservoir Evaluation by Micro-Earthquake Observation

The most common elements that make up minerals are oxygen, silicon, aluminum, iron, calcium, potassium, and magnesium

11301 Reservoir Analogues Characterization by Means of GPR

Effects of depositional and diagenetic heterogeneitites on fluid flow in Plio -- Pleistocene reefal carbonates of the Southern Dominican Republic

Rocks. 3.1 The Rock Cycle. 3.1 The Rock Cycle. 3.1 The Rock Cycle. The Rock Cycle. I. Rocks

Optimisation of Well Trajectory and Hydraulic Fracture Design in a Poor Formation Quality Gas-Condensate Reservoir

HYDROGEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF THE UG2 PYROXENITE AQUIFERS OF THE BUSHVELD COMPLEX

The North Dakota Bakken Play - Observations. Julie A. LeFever North Dakota Geological Survey

HDR PROJECT SOULTZ: HYDRAULIC AND SEISMIC OBSERVATIONS DURING STIMULATION OF THE 3 DEEP WELLS BY MASSIVE WATER INJECTIONS

Drilling And Testing in the Deep Borehole Field Test

Which sample best shows the physical properties normally associated with regional metamorphism? (1) A (3) C (2) B (4) D

Petrophysical Rock Typing: Enhanced Permeability Prediction and Reservoir Descriptions*

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Competing Effect of Pore Fluid and Texture -- Case Study

Joint Interpretation of Magnetotelluric and Seismic Models for Exploration of the Gross Schoenebeck Geothermal Site

David de Courcy-Bower and Samuel Mohr

UK data for geothermal resource assessments

The Role of Magnetotellurics in Geothermal Exploration

Chapter 6. Conclusions. 6.1 Conclusions and perspectives

SHALE GAS AND HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

Assessing our untapped energy resources. Derek Reay Geological Survey of Northern Ireland

Case study 2: Using seismic reflection to design a mine

EROSION, DEPOSITION AND SEDIMENTARY ROCKS. Reading: Earth Science Tarbuck and Lutgens Chapter 5: pages Chapter 3: pages 52-54, 61-69

1: Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, RIPI, Iran, 2: STATOIL ASA, Norway,

P314 Anisotropic Elastic Modelling for Organic Shales

Halliburton Engineering for Success in Developing Shale Assets

Assessing the Effect of Realistic Reservoir Features on the Performance of Sedimentary Geothermal Systems

A STATIC 3D MODELING OF HYDROCARBONIC RESERVOIR WITH THE HELP OF RMS CASE study: THE SOUTH EAST ANTICLINE OF KHUZESTAN IRAN

Reservoir Modeling for Wabamun Area CO2 Sequestration Project (WASP) Davood Nowroozi

Subsurface Geology and Resource Exploration

Hydraulic properties of porous media

The Kingfisher Field, Uganda - A Bird in the Hand! S R Curd, R Downie, P C Logan, P Holley Heritage Oil plc *

3-D Model of Deep Geothermal Potentials in Hesse

Transcription:

Results of the Geothermal Energy Project Hamburg-Allermoehe Martin Zarth Umweltbehoerde Hamburg, Billstraße 84, D-20395 Hamburg, Germany This article was published in: Proceedings of the European Geothermal Conference Basel `99, Volume 2; prepared by F.-D. Vuataz, Centre of Hydrogeology, University of Neuchatel. Contents ABSTRACT KEYWORDS 1. Introduction 2. Drilling results 3. Core examinations 4. Further Borehole Examinations 5. Literature ABSTRACT In the south-eastern area of the city of Hamburg, in depths of about 3000 m the Mittelrhaet- Hauptsandstein exists. In order to assess the geothermal potential of this aquifer, in 1997, an abandoned oil production well was deepened from 2178 down to 3305 m. From 3197 to 3290 m, 4 sandstone horizons of 12, 8, 25, and 28 m thickness were found. The grain size distribution of the sandstone is promising, but the originally large pore volume is mostly cemented with anhydrite. Pumping and injection tests, laboratory examinations, and predictions based on a NMR log yielded comparable permeability values of about 10 md. Thus, the well yield is too low to allow an economical use, despite a considerable high temperature of 128 C. So far, it is unknown, whether the anhydrite cementation is limited to small areas and where it occurs. These questions are crucial for any further hydrothermal energy use in this region. In areas without cementation, a high geothermal potential can be expected, as all other parameters of the sandstone have proved to be promising. The state geological survey (Geologisches Landesamt (GLA) Hamburg) has started to examine the drill cores on geological parameters determining the anhydrite cementation. X-ray radioscopy showed different cementation patterns, which seem to contain important diagenetic information. In addition, strontium and other trace elements analysis with electron and proton microprobe analysis, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), and laser microprobe for material analysis (LAMMA), examinations with global time markers, microthermometrical as well as mineralogical and sedimentological investigations have started or are planned. In situ investigations in the borehole Allermoehe 1 are very necessary, but yet not possible, because of a broken liner. After borehole reconstruction, pumping and injection tests, seismic experiments as well as hydraulic and chemical stimulation tests could yield important

contributions to understand the anhydrite cementation and to reduce the drilling risk in further hydrothermal exploration projects in Northern Germany. KEYWORDS Anhydrite, cementation patterns, diagenesis, hydraulic fracturing, hydrothermal reservoir, permeability. 1. Introduction In the south-eastern area of the city of Hamburg, in depths of about 3000 m, a hydrothermal aquifer, the Mittelrhaet-Hauptsandstein, exists (SCHULZ et al. 1994). In order to assess its geothermal potential, an abandoned oil production well was deepened. The project was carried out by the Hamburgische Electricitaets-Werke AG (HEW) and the Umweltbehoerde Hamburg. 2. Drilling results In July/August 1997, the abandoned oil production well Allermoehe 1 was deepened from 2178 down to 3305 m (LENZ et al. 1997, BEECK et al. 1998). Up to 3175 m different shales were found. They are considerably harder than expected. At 3175 m, the first interbedded shale/sandstone layer started. From 3197 to 3290 m 4 sandstone horizons were found, being 12, 8, 25, and 28 m thick. They are separated by shale or interbedded shale/sandstone layers of 7, 8, and 6 m thickness. Over all, 73 m of sandstone were found, almost double the value that was expected. Totally, 101 m of drill cores were gained in 4 intervals, where 26 m come from sandstone. Up to the depth of 2178 m, a 7 steel liner exists. In the newly drilled part of the hole a 4 ½ glass reinforced epoxy (GRE) liner was installed. During its cementation, for unknown reasons, this liner broke at 2880 m, and its lower part fell 73 m deep to the bottom of the hole. After 42 m of the GRE liner were perforated in the section of the aquifer, a casing lift test yielded the unexpected low production rate of 9 m 3 /h. The permeability was found to be about 3 md, the well productivity 2 m 3 /h x Mpa. An injection test, carried out by the Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR), Hannover, in September 1998, showed that the hydraulic contact between the borehole and the aquifers is not good in most parts of the perforated section (TRAN-VIET et al. 1998). During this test, 39 m 3 of brine were injected. The temperature log showed that most of the water infiltrated within a small zone at 3260 m. This can be best explained by a natural fracture existing at this level. The permeability results from the injection test are comparable to those from the pumping test. Using the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) log, the permeability of the 4 sandstone horizons was determined to be 3.4, 3.2, 1.9, and 7.6 md (from top to bottom), with maximum values up to 88 md. The weighted mean value calculated for 73 m of sandstone is 4.5 md, and the transmissibility is 326 md x m (PAPE et al. 1998). At aquifer level at 3260 m, a fairly high temperature of 128 C was measured. This corresponds to the relatively high temperature gradient of 3.6 K/100 m. The pressure level of the aquifer was found to be 87 m below ground level. The density of the aquifer water is 1.146 kg/l, the mineralization 218 g/l. 3. Core examinations

The core samples show, that the Mittelrhaet-Hauptsandstein consists of white grey fine-sandy middle-grained sandstone. Relatively often, thin layers, parts of layers or bulk sized particles up to 3 cm thick consisting of shale and/or coaly shale are included in the sand-stone. Core samples showed porosity values from 2 to 12 % with an average of 6 %. The permeability varied from 0 to 19 md. Thus, the sandstone is of a low porosity and poor permeability, not sufficient for an economical extraction of hydrothermal energy. Thin section microscopy revealed the reason for the unexpected low permeability of the sandstone: Most of the original pore volume is cemented with anhydrite. The state geological survey (GLA Hamburg) has started to examine this anhydrite cementation in core samples. The goal is to receive more information about the anhydrite formation conditions and about the geological structures possibly associated with cemented and not cemented sandstone areas. In July 1998, all core pieces were registered and scanned with the instrument CoreScanColour from DMT - Gesellschaft fuer Forschung und Pruefung mbh, Essen. Comparison of the scan pictures with the high resolution formation micro scanner (HFMS) data allowed to determine the exact depth of the core samples and, in part, to determine their north-south orientation. Radioscopic examinations (BAERMANN 1999) with x-ray penetrating 3 to 5 mm thick discs showed that the anhydrite cement is not distributed homogeneously in the pore volume of the sandstone, but small areas with completely cemented pores usually exist next to small areas without cement. By this, quite regular cementation patterns are formed, which can well be seen in the x-ray photographs. Depending on the form and size of the cemented and uncemented areas, 5 different cementation patterns were classified so far: - Up to 1 mm large areas with cemented pores build little islands, which are surrounded by an uncemented area. - 1 10 mm large cloudy areas with cemented pores are surrounded by uncemented areas. Some of the cemented areas are interconnected. - Up to 1 mm thick layers with cemented pores alternate with 1 2 mm thick layers with uncemented pores. The layers are oriented more or less horizontally. - 1 15 mm thick layers with cemented pores alternate with 1 2 mm thick layers with uncemented pores. - The pore volume is completely and homogeneously cemented with anhydrite. No structures can be seen in the x-ray photographs. So far, these anhydrite cementation patterns were analysed in a limited number of samples. Thus, it is yet not known, if these patterns change continuously with increasing depth or if there are discontinuities, possibly at thin shale layers. Already yet, the results indicate that the cementation patterns regularly change with increasing depth, and this happens three times in the examined, 25 m thick aquifer. This regularity seems to be caused by some characteristics of the cementation process, which are yet not known but which might be revealed in further examinations. A statistically relevant number of core samples are planned to be examined by x- ray radioscopy. The goal is to get a detailed picture of the cementation patterns and their changes with increasing depth, and to find out, if the cementation patterns correlate with other petrophysical properties of the sandstone. Surprisingly, the cementation patterns detected by radioscopy were less good or not at all detectable by thin section microscopy.

Thin section microscopy showed a wide range of quartz and anhydrite content. Anhydrite varies from 3 to 40 %. A correlation between the size of the sand particles and the amount of anhydrite could not be found so far. Depending on the position of the thin section slide with respect to the cementation pattern, the anhydrite values can vary a lot. So, when thin section analysis is carried out, the cementation pattern should always be taken into account. Besides quartz and anhydrite, the following components were found: up to 15 % kaolinite and chlorite, up to 5 % stone fragments and feldspar, about 3 % quartz cement, and up to 2 % opaque minerals, as well as traces of zirconium silicate, tourmaline, and titanium oxide. The x-ray diffraction analysis yielded similar results as the thin section microscopy. Strontium and barium analysis were started in order to find out the origin of the solutions yielding the sulphate for the anhydrite cementation. The first results of the x-ray fluorescence analysis of anhydrite cemented sandstone samples showed 0.1 to 0.016 % strontium and 0.01 to 0.06 % barium. With electron microprobe analysis of individual anhydrite crystals, different values for strontium were found depending on the depth. The content of strontium seems to descend, if the size of the cemented islands increases. Using high resolution proton microprobe analysis, the distribution of strontium within individual anhydrite cemented pores (1.6 x 0.8 mm) could be analysed. Depending on the depth, 300 to 11 900 mg/kg of strontium were found. Further examinations must show, whether different zones with different strontium content were built during the growth of the anhydrite crystals. This would indicate, that the solution changed chemically during the cementation process. It is planned to use also the more sensitive SIMS (Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry) and LAMMA (Laser Microprobe for Material Analysis) to analyse the distribution of strontium, barium, and other trace elements within individual anhydrite crystals. With SIMS analysis, global time markers like 87 Sr/ 86 Sr can be detected, too. Some additional information about the temperature and fluid history might be receivable by analysing inclusions of fluids in the sandstone by microthermometrical methods. For the same purpose, the vitrinite reflection is planned to be measured over the whole depth of the drilling. Meanwhile no carbonate cements occur in the sandstone cores from 3222 to 3260 m, such cements like dolomite and ankerite were detected in the thin interbedded shale/sandstone layers at about 3180 m. Additional mineralogical and sediment petrological examinations are planned to find out how the cementation of these two areas is related. 4. Further Borehole Examinations The possibilities to use the borehole Allermoehe 1 for further investigations are very limited, due to the window in the broken 4 ½ GRE liner at 2880 2953 m, and because of the fallen liner blocking the aquifer. A removable 2 3/8 coiled tubing (N 80) was installed within the broken GRE liner to allow measuring devices to be introduced safely. As there exists no other borehole in Northern Germany that allows to investigate the anhydrite cementation in situ, the reconstruction of Allermoehe 1 would be of great importance. For this, the broken GRE liner has to be milled and removed. Probably, the lower part of the liner is not cemented and eventually can be removed without being milled. Liner cement and other materials clogging the sandstone have to be removed by undercutting in order to get a good hydraulic contact between the borehole and the aquifer. Then, a new liner, preferably made of steel, must be installed. The reconstructed borehole Allermoehe 1 would give the opportunity to carry out a large in situ investigation program, dealing with the problem of the anhydrite cementation. Before installing the new steel liner, all geophysical borehole measurements requiring an open borehole

can be carried out, e. g. vertical seismic profiling (VSP), seismic borehole experiments, high resolution formation micro scanner (HFMS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR Total Porosity). Pumping and injection tests would yield the over all productivity and permeability of the aquifer. It can be expected to be considerably higher than the values received from the former well production tests. Additional flowmeter and temperature logs can show, how much the permeability varies locally. They can also detect natural fractures or high permeable zones, which already showed up in the first injection test as well as in some core samples. Due to those fractures, the well productivity might be considerably higher than indicated by core examinations and NMR log (CLAUSER 1992). Injection tests can also find out, whether the anhydrite cementation is limited to a small area around the borehole and whether uncemented, high permeable areas exist close to the hole. High permeable fractures in the closer vicinity of the borehole can also be detected. The reconstructed borehole Allermoehe 1 would also be a favourable place to test hydraulic fracturing techniques. They have been developed in the Hot Dry Rock (HDR) projects for granite, but they have not been applied to cemented sedimentary rocks so far. During those tests, up to several thousand cubic meters of water are pressed into the aquifer. Afterwards, hydraulic tests are applied to find out the effectiveness of the fracturing, and geophysical borehole measurements can show the location and orientation of the produced fractures. These techniques are yielding especially good results, when natural fractures in the vicinity can be connected to the borehole. Theoretically, the productivity of anhydrite cemented aquifers can also be stimulated by dissolving the anhydrite using special water/salt solutions at lower temperatures. The reconstructed borehole Allermoehe 1 would be a good place to test those chemical stimulation techniques in situ, too. There is a good chance that those stimulation techniques can increase the productivity of a cemented aquifer to economically feasible levels. In situ investigations and tests are also important to prove and complement laboratory and mathematical simulation results. Thus, reconstruction of the borehole Allermoehe 1 and performing the described in situ investigation program would yield an important contribution to the reduction of the drilling risk in further hydrothermal exploration projects in Northern Germany. 5. Literature BAERMANN, A. 1999. Mineralogische, geochemische und röntgenografische Charakterisierung von Bohrkernen aus dem Rhät-Sandstein Gutachten. Dr. Baermann & Partner, Bericht-Nr.: G 64-1/99, Hamburg. BEECK H., HORN H., MENZEL H., LINKE G., RÖHLING H.-G. & ZARTH M. 1998. Ergebnisse der Geothermie-Erkundungsbohrung Hamburg-Allermöhe. In: 5. Geothermische Fachtagung Straubing Geothermie: Forschung Entwicklung Markt ; Herausgeber: Geothermische Vereinigung e. V. und Stadtwerke Straubing; Geeste 1998; ISBN 3-932 570-14-6. CLAUSER C. 1992. Permeability of Crystalline Rocks. EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 73(21): 233-237.

LENZ, G., HORN, H. & KELLNER, T. 1997. Geologisch-bohrtechnischer Abschlußbericht Verteufung Bohrung Hamburg-Allermöhe 1. GTN Ingenieure & Geologen, Neubrandenburg. PAPE, H., CLAUSER, C. & IFFLAND, J. 1998. Zusammenhang zwischen Permeabilität und Porosität bei Aquifer-Sandsteinen auf der Grundlage einer fraktalen Porenraumgeometrie. In: 5. Geothermische Fachtagung Straubing Geothermie: Forschung Entwicklung Markt ; Herausgeber: Geothermische Vereinigung e. V. und Stadtwerke Straubing; Geeste 1998; ISBN 3-932 570-14- 6. SCHULZ, R., BEUTLER, G., RÖHLING, H.-G., WERNER, K.-H., ROCKEL, W., BECKER, U., KABUS, F., KELLNER, T., LENZ, G. & SCHNEIDER, H. 1994. Regionale Untersuchungen von geothermischen Reserven und Ressourcen in Nordwestdeutschland - Endbericht. NLfB/BGR-Archiv- Nr. 111 758, Hannover. TRAN-VIET T., JUNG R. & SCHELLSCHMIDT R. 1998. Injektionstest in der Geothermie- Erkundungs-bohrung Allermöhe Feldbericht. NLFB/BGR-Archiv-Nr. 117 755, Hannover.