ON BASICITY OF A SYSTEM OF EXPONENTS WITH DEGENERATING COEFFICIENTS

Similar documents
On Riemann Boundary Value Problem in Hardy Classes with Variable Summability Exponent

Basicity of System of Exponents with Complex Coefficients in Generalized Lebesgue Spaces

ON ISOMORPHISM OF TWO BASES IN MORREY-LEBESGUE TYPE SPACES

Bases of exponents with a piecewise linear phase in generalized weighted Lebesgue space

BASES FROM EXPONENTS IN LEBESGUE SPACES OF FUNCTIONS WITH VARIABLE SUMMABILITY EXPONENT

On the Well-Posedness of the Cauchy Problem for a Neutral Differential Equation with Distributed Prehistory

Sufficient conditions for functions to form Riesz bases in L 2 and applications to nonlinear boundary-value problems

On a Boundary-Value Problem for Third Order Operator-Differential Equations on a Finite Interval

Proc. A. Razmadze Math. Inst. 151(2009), V. Kokilashvili

W. Lenski and B. Szal ON POINTWISE APPROXIMATION OF FUNCTIONS BY SOME MATRIX MEANS OF CONJUGATE FOURIER SERIES

for all subintervals I J. If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D J only, we will write ϕ BMO d (J). In fact, the following is true

MATH 5640: Fourier Series

1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),

ẋ = f(x, y), ẏ = g(x, y), (x, y) D, can only have periodic solutions if (f,g) changes sign in D or if (f,g)=0in D.

ON THE GAPS BETWEEN ZEROS OF TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIALS

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday August 31, 2010 (Day 1)

SZEGÖ ASYMPTOTICS OF EXTREMAL POLYNOMIALS ON THE SEGMENT [ 1, +1]: THE CASE OF A MEASURE WITH FINITE DISCRETE PART

Research Article On Behavior of Solution of Degenerated Hyperbolic Equation

MAIN ARTICLES. In present paper we consider the Neumann problem for the operator equation

Integral Jensen inequality

lim when the limit on the right exists, the improper integral is said to converge to that limit.

Vectors in Function Spaces

Stability of a Class of Singular Difference Equations

Singularities and Laplacians in Boundary Value Problems for Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations

Hardy spaces of Dirichlet series and function theory on polydiscs

Memoirs on Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics

Applied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.

COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014

On the bang-bang property of time optimal controls for infinite dimensional linear systems

MATH 1A, Complete Lecture Notes. Fedor Duzhin

Explosive Solution of the Nonlinear Equation of a Parabolic Type

Functional Analysis Exercise Class

1 The Existence and Uniqueness Theorem for First-Order Differential Equations

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas

arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 21 Jun 2016

NORMS OF PRODUCTS OF SINES. A trigonometric polynomial of degree n is an expression of the form. c k e ikt, c k C.

A set on which the Lojasiewicz exponent at infinity is attained

Metric Spaces and Topology

Oscillation theorems for the Dirac operator with spectral parameter in the boundary condition

Bounded point derivations on R p (X) and approximate derivatives

A TWO PARAMETERS AMBROSETTI PRODI PROBLEM*

Math 411, Complex Analysis Definitions, Formulas and Theorems Winter y = sinα

JUHA KINNUNEN. Partial Differential Equations

Some functional inequalities in variable exponent spaces with a more generalization of uniform continuity condition

MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction

2 Statement of the problem and assumptions

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

u xx + u yy = 0. (5.1)

Defining the Integral

The Skorokhod reflection problem for functions with discontinuities (contractive case)

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 8(3), 2015, pp THE NORM OF CERTAIN MATRIX OPERATORS ON NEW DIFFERENCE SEQUENCE SPACES

9. Banach algebras and C -algebras

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

Banach Algebras of Matrix Transformations Between Spaces of Strongly Bounded and Summable Sequences

Mem. Differential Equations Math. Phys. 44 (2008), Malkhaz Ashordia and Shota Akhalaia

A class of non-convex polytopes that admit no orthonormal basis of exponentials

L p Spaces and Convexity

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

INDEX. Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, for sequences, boundary points, bounded functions, 142 bounded sets, 42 43

INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS THE CZECH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. Note on the fast decay property of steady Navier-Stokes flows in the whole space

Elementary linear algebra

Math 321 Final Examination April 1995 Notation used in this exam: N. (1) S N (f,x) = f(t)e int dt e inx.

A MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FOR A MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEM

Hilbert Spaces. Contents

Problem Set 5: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Department of Mathematics MA4247 Complex Analysis II Lecture Notes Part II

LECTURE-15 : LOGARITHMS AND COMPLEX POWERS

PROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space

WEIGHTED REVERSE WEAK TYPE INEQUALITY FOR GENERAL MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS

Rolle s Theorem for Polynomials of Degree Four in a Hilbert Space 1

Math 118B Solutions. Charles Martin. March 6, d i (x i, y i ) + d i (y i, z i ) = d(x, y) + d(y, z). i=1

ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MAXIMUM OF SUMS OF A SEQUENCE OF INDEPENDENT AND IDENTICALLY DISTRIBUTED RANDOM VARIABLES.

Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1

The wave model of metric spaces

EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO A BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM FOR AN INFINITE SYSTEM OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

HOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION

A note on a construction of J. F. Feinstein

OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEM DESCRIBING BY THE CAUCHY PROBLEM FOR THE FIRST ORDER LINEAR HYPERBOLIC SYSTEM WITH TWO INDEPENDENT VARIABLES

arxiv: v2 [math.ds] 9 Jun 2013

Tools from Lebesgue integration

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

Sobolev Spaces 27 PART II. Review of Sobolev Spaces

Riesz Representation Theorems

van Rooij, Schikhof: A Second Course on Real Functions

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

MATH 722, COMPLEX ANALYSIS, SPRING 2009 PART 5

PROPERTIES OF SOLUTIONS TO NEUMANN-TRICOMI PROBLEMS FOR LAVRENT EV-BITSADZE EQUATIONS AT CORNER POINTS

The Wiener algebra and Wiener s lemma

An introduction to Mathematical Theory of Control

Chapter 30 MSMYP1 Further Complex Variable Theory

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

NONLINEAR DIFFERENTIAL INEQUALITY. 1. Introduction. In this paper the following nonlinear differential inequality

ESTIMATES ON THE NUMBER OF LIMIT CYCLES OF A GENERALIZED ABEL EQUATION

RENORMALIZED SOLUTIONS ON QUASI OPEN SETS WITH NONHOMOGENEOUS BOUNDARY VALUES TONI HUKKANEN

NEW BOUNDS FOR TRUNCATION-TYPE ERRORS ON REGULAR SAMPLING EXPANSIONS

Places of Number Fields and Function Fields MATH 681, Spring 2018

Contents. 2 Sequences and Series Approximation by Rational Numbers Sequences Basics on Sequences...

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

Volterra Integral Equations of the First Kind with Jump Discontinuous Kernels

COMPOSITION SEMIGROUPS ON BMOA AND H AUSTIN ANDERSON, MIRJANA JOVOVIC, AND WAYNE SMITH

Transcription:

TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. V.1, N.2, 2010, pp. 257-264 ON BASICITY OF A SYSTEM OF EXPONENTS WITH DEGENERATING COEFFICIENTS S.G. VELIYEV 1, A.R.SAFAROVA 2 Abstract. A system of exponents of power character degenerating coefficients is considered in the paper. Under definited conditions on the coefficients the basicity criterion of this system is obtained in Lebesgue spaces. Keywords: a system of exponents, basicity, Hardy weight class. AMS Subject Classification: 17A32, 17A36. 1. Introduction The paper studies basicity in Lebesgue space L p L p (, π), 1 < p <, of the following system of exponents with degenerating coefficients ω ± (t) of the form r ± A (t) ω (t) e int ; A (t) ω (t) e ikt n 0;k 1, (1) ω ± (t) t π β±π t π β± r ± k=1 t t ± β± k k, (2) where t ± k R and A ± (t) A ± (t) e iα± (t) are complex valued functions on [, π]. 1 Earlier, basicity of the system e i(nαsignn)t n Z (Z is a set of integers) in L p, 1 < p <, that is a particular case of (1), was completely studied in the papers [3-5]. The most general case of system (1) without degenerations of ω ± (t) was considered in [1]. Basicity of system (2) in L p with degenerations of the form (2) in the case when β π ± = β ± = 0, was first considered in [7]. In the present paper, we study basicity of system (1) in L p with degenerations of the form (2). General investigation scheme is as follows: Hardy weight classes are determined interior and exterior to a unit circle, respectively. A special boundary value problem of the theory of analytic functions in these classes is considered. Fredholm property of this problem is proved under certain conditions. Using these results, basicity of system (1) in L p is established. 1 Nakhchivan Teachers Institute, Azerbaijan, e-mail: sadiq-valiyev@rambler.ru 2 Nakhchivan State University, Azerbaijan, Manuscript received 11 June 2010. 257

258 TWMS J. PURE APPL. MATH., V.1, N.2, 2010 Accept the following denotation f p,ν = 2. Basic assumptions and notions f = sup vrai f (t) ; (,π) ( 1/p f (t) p ν (t) dt), 1 p <. Assume that the following main assumptions are fulfilled: ) 1) A ± (t) L ; A ± 1 <, β π ± ; β ± ; β± k, k = 1, r± ( 1 p, ; 2) L ± (t) are piecewise Holder functions on the segment [, π]; s k r 1 : < s 1 <... < s r < π are discontinuity points of the function θ (t) α (t) α (t). We ll use Hardy weight classes H p,ν ± introduced in the paper [6]. Suppose H f H 1 : f L p,ν, where H 1 ± are ordinary Hardy classes interior and exterior to a unit circle, respectively, ν is some weight function, L p,ν is Lebesgue s ordinary weight class on [, π], f ± ( e it) are non-tangential boundary values of the function f H 1 ± on a unit circle. Introduce on H the norm H as follows f H f ( e it) p,ν, f H. (3) The following statement is valid Statement 1. Let ν p q L 1, 1 p 1 q = 1, 1 p <. Then the space H with respect to the norm (3) becomes Banach and we denote it by H p,ν. The class m Hp,ν is introduced in the same way. Let m H1 be a Hardy class of analytic exterior to a unit circle functions possessing at most m order at infinity. Accept H f m H1 : f ( e it) L p,ν. The similar statement holds in this case as well. Statement 2. Let ν p q L 1, 1 p 1 q = 1, 1 p <. Then the space H with respect to the norm f H = f ( e it) p,ν, f H, is Banach and we denote it by m H p,ν. The following conjugation problem in the class H p,ν m H p,ν F (τ) G (τ) F (τ) = g (τ), τ Γ, (4) where Γ : τ = 1 is a unit circle, plays an important part in proving basicity. As a solution of problem (4) we take the pair (F (z) ; F (z)) H p,ν m H p,ν whose non-tangential boundary values almost everywhere on Γ satisfy relation (4), where g L p (Γ) is the right hand side, G (τ) is the problem s coefficient. We should consider the specific case G ( e it) = A (t) ω (t) A (t) ω (t) ; ν± (t) ω ± p. The following analytic introduced interior (sign ) and exterior (sign - ) to a unit circle functions X ± k (z), k = 1, 3 are X 1 ± (z) = exp ± 1 ln ω (t) 4π ω (t) eit z e it z dt,

S.G. VELIYEV, A.R.SAFAROVA: ON A BASICITY OF THE SYSTEM OF EXPONENTS WITH... 259 Determine Assume X 2 ± (z) = exp ± 1 ln A (t) 4π A (t) eit z e it z dt, X 3 ± (z) = exp ± i θ (t) eit z 4π e it z dt. X k (z), z < 1, Z k (z) [ X k (z)] 1, z > 1, k = 1, 3. 3 Z (z) Z k (z). k=1 3. General solution Consider the following homogeneous problem F (τ) G (τ) F (τ) = 0, τ Γ. (5) Under definited conditions on the coefficient G (τ) we can obtain representation for more general solution of homogeneous problem (5). Thus, by Sokhotskiy-Plemel formulas we have G (τ) = Z (τ) Z (τ), τ Γ. Considering this expression in (5), we get F (τ) Z (τ) = F (τ) Z (τ), τ Γ. Introduce the following piecewise-analytic function Φ (z) Consequently Φ (z) F (z), z < 1, Z (z), z > 1. F (z) Z (z) Φ (τ) = Φ (τ), τ Γ. If Φ H 1 mh1, it follows from the uniqueness theorem [7] that Φ (z) is a polynomial of at most m power. It suffices to prove Φ ± (τ) L 1 (Γ). Since the expression F ( e it) ω (t) belongs to the space L p (it follows from definition of the solution), it suffices to show that the expression [ ω (t) Z ( e it)] 1 belongs to Lq. Then, the required one will follow from Holder s inequality. So, in h k we refer all positive numbers among hk, k = 1, r. Absolute values of the remaining h k denote by h k. Their appropriate jump points denote by s k and s k. Introduce u 0 (t) = sin t π h (0) π 2 exp 1 θ 0 (s) ctg t s 4π 2 ds, where θ 0 (t) is a continuous part of Jordan expansion. θ (t) = θ 0 (t) θ 1 (t) θ 1 (t) is jumps function and h (0) = θ 0 (π) θ 0 (). Denote

260 TWMS J. PURE APPL. MATH., V.1, N.2, 2010 u ± (t) = sin t s ± h± k 2π k 2. k Let h π = θ () θ (π). Following the results of the paper [5], we have: ( Z 3 e it ) = u0 (t) [ u (t) ] 1 u (t) sin t π hπ 2π 2. Considering these expressions, we can easily get the following representation: Y (t) ω (t) Z ( e it) 1 = Z 2 ( e it ) 1 Z 3 ( e it ) 1 ω (t) ω (t) 1 2. As it follows from the results of lemma 19.2 of the paper [7, p.195], the relations: u 0 ±1 ( < ; Z 2 e it ) ±1 < are fulfilled. For the relation 0 < δ f(t) g(t) δ1 <, as t a, we accept the standard denotation f (t) g (t), as t a. It is obvious that Y (t) ω (t) ω (t) 1 2 sin t h π 2π 2, as t ±π. Considering the expression ω ± (t), we get Y (t) t π β π β π 2 hπ 2π, as t π; β β Y (t) t π h π 2 2π, as t. In order to get similar representation in the neighbourhood the other degeneration points, we r ± must some quantities. So, let T ± t ± k k=1, S s k r 1. Accept T T S = σ k l 1. By T ± k we denote the one-element set t ± k, k = 1, r ±. Similar denotation are accepted for S k = s k and Ω k = σ k. Consider the following set function where is an empty set. Accept Assume χ (A) = 1, A 0, 0, A =, λ ± k = 1 r ± 2 i=1 β± i χ ( T i ± ) Ωk, k = 1, l λ k = 1 r 2π i=1 h iχ (S i Ωk ), k = 1, l (6) γ k = λ k λ k λ k, k = 1, l. (7) In these denotation, the expression ω (t) ω (t) 1 2 in the neighbourhood the points σ k is of the form: ω (t) ω (t) 1 2 t σ k λ k λ k, as t σk, k = 1, l. On the other hand, Z 3 ( e it ) 1 sin tσ k λ k 2 t σ k λ k, as t σ k, k = 1, l is valid. As a result, for Y (t) we obtain Y (t) t σ k γ k, as t σ k, k = 1, l. It follows from these relations that if the inequalities 1 q < γ k, k = 1, l; 2 q < β π β π h k π ; 2 q < β β h k π,

S.G. VELIYEV, A.R.SAFAROVA: ON A BASICITY OF THE SYSTEM OF EXPONENTS WITH... 261 are fulfilled, then Y (t) belongs to L q. Then it follows from arguments mentioned above that Φ (z) is a polynomial P m (z) of at most m order, i.e. F (z) = Z (z) P m (z). It is clear that if F (z) H p,ν m H p,ν, then F (z) is a solution of homogeneous problem (5). It suffices to show that Y (t) = Z ( e it) ω (t) belongs to L p. It is easy to see that if γ k < 1, k = 1, l; p β π βπ h k π < 2 p ; β β h k π < 2 p hold, then Y 1 (t) belongs to L p. Thus, it is valid the following Theorem 1. Let conditions 1); 2) hold and the inequalities 1 q < γ k < 1, k = 1, l; p 2 q < β π β π h k π < 2 p ; 2 q < β β h k π < 2 p, where the quantities γ k l 1 are determined by expressions (6), (7), be fulfilled. Then a general solution of homogeneous problem (5) in the class H p,ν m H is of the form p,ν F (z) = Z (z) P m (z), where Z (z) is a canonic solution, P m (z) is an arbitrary polynomial of at most m power. This theorem yields the Corollary 1. Let all the conditions of theorem 1 be fulfilled. Then homogeneous problem (5) under condition F ( ) = 0 in the class H p,ν m H p,ν only is trivially solvable. 4. Basicity Studying the basicity of system (1) in L p we ll follow the paper [6]. Take f L p and consider the homogeneous problem F (τ) G (τ) F (τ) = g (τ), t Γ, (8) F ( ) = 0 in the class H p,ν m H, where g ( e it) f(t), t [, π]. Assume that all the conditions p,ν ω (t) of the Theorem 1 are fulfilled. Then it is clear that the homogeneous problem has only a trivial solution and this means that homogeneous problem (8) may have a unique solution. Show that it is solvable. Let Z (z) be any canonic solution of the homogeneous problem. Consider the following piecewise-analytic function F (z): F (z) = Z (z) g ( e iσ) 2π Z (e iσ ) dσ 1 e i(tσ). If follows from the Sokhotskiy-Plemel formula that F ( e it) ω ( e it) = f (t) Z 0 (t) 2π f (σ) dσ, (9) Z 0 (σ) 1 ei(tσ) where Z 0 (t) ω (t) Z ( e it). As it follows from the theorem 16.5, monography [2], the integral operator I [f] = Z 0 (t) f (σ) Z 0 (σ) dσ 1 e i(tσ)

262 TWMS J. PURE APPL. MATH., V.1, N.2, 2010 boundedly acts from L p to L p. Then it follows from expression (9) that F ( e it) belongs to L p,ν. As we have shown Y 1 (t) belongs to L q. Thus it follows from the obvious relation that Z 0 (t) L q. integral belongs to H µ f(σ) dσ Z 0 (σ) A (t) ω (t) Z ( e it) = A (t) ω (t) Z ( e it), Consequently, f(t) Z 0 (σ) L 1 and this means that the Cauchy-Lebesgue type 1z belongs to the class H 1. From expression then we have F (z) that it for some µ > 0. Further we ll assume that the inequalities: 1 p < β± π < 1 q ; 1 p < β± < 1 q ; 1 p < β± k < 1 q, k = 1, r±. (10) hold. Obviously ω ± (t) 1 L q. As the expression F ( e it) ω (t) belongs to L p then it follows directly from F ( e it) = [ F ( e it) ω (t) ] ω (t) 1 that F (z) H 1. Finally, we get that F (z) H. From the same reasoning s it follows that F (z) p,ν mh p,ν. Since z ( ) = 1, it is clear that F ( ) = 1. Thus, F (z) is a solution of problem (8). Let L p and m L p be contractions of the functions from the classes H p and m H p on a unit circle, respectively. Denote L p,ν ml p,ν f L 1 : f p,ν <, f L 1 : f p,ν <. As it is shown in the paper [6], if inequalities (10) are fulfilled, the system e int n 0 ( e int n m ) makes a basis on L ( p,ν m L ). It is obvious that F ( e it) L (F ( e it) p,ν p,ν 1 L ). Expanding these functions in appropriate bases, we p,ν get f (t) = A (t) ω (t) f n e int A (t) ω (t) fn e int, (11) n=0 where F ( e it) = n=0 f n e int (F ( e it) = n=1 f n e int ). Convergence is understood in L p,ν ( 1 L p,ν ). We directly get from (11) that an arbitrary function from L p is expanded in it in system (1). For basicity of system (1) in L p, it suffices to show its minimality in it. In problem (8), in the place of f (t) we take the function f (t) A (t) ω (t) e in 0t, where n 0 0 is some fixed integer. We have n=1 A (t) ω (t) F ( e it) A (t) ω (t) F ( e it) = A (t) ω (t) e in 0t, t [, π] ; F ( ) = 0 It is obvious that the function (12) F 0 (z) = z n 0, z > 1, 0, z < 1, is a solution of the problem in H p,ν m H p,ν. On the other hand, as we have shown, the function F (z) = Z (z) 2π is also a solution of (12). Consequently, A (t) e in 0t Z (e it ) dt 1 ze it

S.G. VELIYEV, A.R.SAFAROVA: ON A BASICITY OF THE SYSTEM OF EXPONENTS WITH... 263 Z (z) π A (t) e in 0t dt z 2π Z (e it ) 1 ze it = n 0, z > 1 0, z < 1 is valid. Having expanded the left hand side in powers of z n and denoted the appropriate integrand expression at the coefficient z n by h n (t), from the previous relation we obtain 1 π [ ] A (t) ω (t) e in 0t 1 Z (z) 2π ω (t) Z (e it ) 1 ze it dt = = A (t) ω (t) e in0t h n (t)dtz n z n 0, z > 1, = 0, z < 1, n=0 where ( ) is a complex conjugation. Hence it follows that A (t) ω (t) e in 0t h n (t)dt = δ n0 n, n 0, n 0, where δ nk - is a Kronecker symbol. It follows from [ ω (t) Z ( e it)] 1 Lq, that h n n 0 L q. From the same considerations we get A (t) ω (t) e ikt h n (t)dt = 0, k 1; n 0. In the same way, it is proved that there is such a system h n n 1 L q for which the relations are valid A (t) ω (t) e ikt h n (t)dt = δ nk, n, k 1; A (t) ω (t) e ikt h n (t)dt = 0, k 0, k 1. This proves minimality of the system (1) in L p. Thus, we proved the following theorem. Theorem 2. Let conditions 1); 2) hold, inequalities (10) be valid and 1 q < γ k < 1, k = 1, ℵ; p 2 q < β π β π h π π < 2 p ; 2 q < β β h π π < 2 p, where the quantities γ k ℵ 1 are determined by expressions (6), (7), be fulfilled. Then the system (1) forms a basis in L p, 1 < p <. References [1] Bilalov, B.T., (1990), Basicity of some systems of exponent cosines and sines., Differents. Urav., 26(1), pp.10-16. [2] Danilyuk, I.I., (1975), Irregular boundary value problems in the plane, M., Nauka,256 p. [3] Devdariani, G.G., (1986), Basicity of some system functions, Differents. Urav., 22(1), pp. 170-171. [4] Moiseev, E. I., (1994), On basicity of systems of sines and cosines, DAN SSSR, 285(4), pp. 794-798. [5] Sedletskiy, A. M., (1982), Biortogonal expansion in series of exponents on the integrals of a real axis, Usp. Mat. Nauk, 37(5),(227), pp. 51-59. [6] Veliyev, S.G., (2005), Bases from eigenfunctions subsets of two discontinuous differential operators, Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 12 (2), p.p. 148-157. [7] Veliyev, S. G., (2006), Boundary Value Problems and Bases from Exponents, Baku, Elm, 282 p.

264 TWMS J. PURE APPL. MATH., V.1, N.2, 2010 Veliyev Sadyg was born in 1946 in Sharur region of Azerbaijan. He graduated from Baku State University in 1968.He got Ph.D. degree in 1973 in the Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences and Doctor of Sciences degree in 2006. His research interests include spectral analysis. He has published about 113 scientific- methodical works, 2 monographers. From 2006 to 2010 he was a rector of Nakhchivan Teachers Institute. Safarova Arzu was born in 1978 in Julfa of Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic. She graduated from Nakhchivan State University in 1999. She received M.S. degree in 2001.Since 2003, she works at Nakhchivan State University. Presently she is PhD in the same University. Her research interests include different branches of mathematical analysis.