VERIFICATION OF TAPPING MACHINES. Håkan Andersson

Similar documents
ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

PHYSICS 12 NAME: Magnetic Field and Force

Engineering Metrology and Instrumentation

BD-04a: Check Machine Geometry and Lost Motion

A) 4.0 m/s B) 5.0 m/s C) 0 m/s D) 3.0 m/s E) 2.0 m/s. Ans: Q2.

Set No - 1 I B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations Jan./Feb ENGINEERING MECHANICS

Rolling, Torque & Angular Momentum

Postprint.

Chapter Rotational Motion

Test 7 wersja angielska

AQA Maths M2. Topic Questions from Papers. Moments and Equilibrium

Summer Physics 41 Pretest. Shorty Shorts (2 pts ea): Circle the best answer. Show work if a calculation is required.

Name Date Period PROBLEM SET: ROTATIONAL DYNAMICS

ilearnalignment Alignment Training Subjects

Auto collimator. Introduction. Objectives: Apparatus: Theory:

AP Physics Multiple Choice Practice Torque

ALIGNMENT OF THE MSGC BARREL SUPPORT STRUCTURE

PHYSICS 149: Lecture 21

Use of computer generated holograms for alignment of complex null correctors

Pre-AP Physics Review Problems

3-D METROLOGY APPLIED TO SUPERCONDUCTING DIPOLE MAGNETS FOR LHC

Centripetal acceleration ac = to2r Kinetic energy of rotation KE, = \lto2. Moment of inertia. / = mr2 Newton's second law for rotational motion t = la

Webreview Torque and Rotation Practice Test

Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit State Examinations Commission

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

Measurement of Acoustic Properties of light weight concrete SL-Deck

PHY 001 (Physics I) Lecture 7

[1.] This problem has five multiple choice questions. Circle the best answer in each case.

Suggested Problems. Chapter 1

Anna University May/June 2013 Exams ME2151 Engineering Mechanics Important Questions.

Mechanics II. Which of the following relations among the forces W, k, N, and F must be true?

Name: Date: Period: AP Physics C Rotational Motion HO19

AP Physics QUIZ Chapters 10

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

Read the following BEFORE getting started:

1 MR SAMPLE EXAM 3 FALL 2013

TFI Report Sound Absorption Impact Sound Insulation

Fine Alignment of the ATF Damping Ring

PHYS 1303 Final Exam Example Questions

DEVELOPMENT OF DROP WEIGHT IMPACT TEST MACHINE

Chapter 9-10 Test Review

Physics 110 Third Hour Exam

INVESTIGATION OF IMPACT HAMMER CALIBRATIONS

TFI Report Sound Absorption Impact Sound Insulation

The net force on a moving object is suddenly reduced to zero. As a consequence, the object

Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Institute of Technology School Of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Extension Division Assignment 2

EXPERIMENTAL COMPETITION

Unit 21 Couples and Resultants with Couples

TFI Report Sound Absorption Impact Sound Insulation

EZ PUSH-TO MANUAL EZ PUSH TO MANUAL. romer-optics.com.

PHYS 1303 Final Exam Example Questions

PHYSICS - CLUTCH CH 13: ROTATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM.

AK-47/74 Barrel and Front Trunnion Rivet Removal

CHAPTER 8: ROTATIONAL OF RIGID BODY PHYSICS. 1. Define Torque

Exam 2--PHYS 101-Fall 2009

EXPERIMENT 2-6. e/m OF THE ELECTRON GENERAL DISCUSSION

Rotation review packet. Name:

TFI Report Sound Absorption Impact Sound Insulation

11. (7 points: Choose up to 3 answers) What is the tension,!, in the string? a.! = 0.10 N b.! = 0.21 N c.! = 0.29 N d.! = N e.! = 0.

ER2 Short-head Electric Chain Hoist

GP-B Telescope Determine Metering Tube Length P0364 Rev -

TutorBreeze.com 7. ROTATIONAL MOTION. 3. If the angular velocity of a spinning body points out of the page, then describe how is the body spinning?

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN Department of Physics and Engineering Physics

Mechanics 2 THURSDAY 17 JANUARY 2008

OPERATIONS SUPPLEMENT FOR THE COMPARISON AUTOCOLLIMATOR, D600

1. Replace the given system of forces acting on a body as shown in figure 1 by a single force and couple acting at the point A.

DROP-WEIGHT SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC PRESSURE CALIBRATION

8.012 Physics I: Classical Mechanics Fall 2008

Physics 476LW Advanced Physics Laboratory Michelson Interferometer

Last Name: First Name Network-ID Discussion Section: Discussion TA Name:

Final MC questions for practice

Physics 101 Fall 2006: Final Exam Free Response and Instructions

2008 FXA THREE FORCES IN EQUILIBRIUM 1. Candidates should be able to : TRIANGLE OF FORCES RULE

Chapter 9. Rotational Dynamics

Physics 201 Midterm Exam 3

14300 Dynamics Carts w/o Hoops Teachers Instructions

Tutorials. 1. Autocollimator. Angle Dekkor. General

Physics 211 Week 10. Statics: Walking the Plank (Solution)

PHYSICS PAPER QUESTIONS

1. An object is dropped from rest. Which of the five following graphs correctly represents its motion? The positive direction is taken to be downward.

Physics. Practice Questions IEB

1. A sphere with a radius of 1.7 cm has a volume of: A) m 3 B) m 3 C) m 3 D) 0.11 m 3 E) 21 m 3

BHARATHIDASAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE, NATTRAMPALLI. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING FAQ

APPLIED MATHEMATICS HIGHER LEVEL

SPECIMEN. Date Morning/Afternoon Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes. AS Level Physics A H156/02 Depth in physics Sample Question Paper PMT

Important Instructions

EXPERIMENT No.1 FLOW MEASUREMENT BY ORIFICEMETER

Angular Momentum. Brown University Physics 0030 Physics Department Lab 4

AP Physics Electromagnetic Wrap Up

AP Physics C: Rotation II. (Torque and Rotational Dynamics, Rolling Motion) Problems

Experiment 11. Moment of Inertia

AP Physics Free Response Practice Dynamics

Metallic materials Brinell hardness test. Part 2: Verification and calibration of testing machines

Speckle phenomenon and its potential for metrology

2) A linear charge distribution extends along the x axis from 0 to A (where A > 0). In that region, the charge density λ is given by λ = cx where c

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Phys 2210 S18 Practice Exam 3: Ch 8 10

PSI AP Physics B Circular Motion

Chapter 15 Kinematics of a Particle: Impulse and Momentum. Lecture Notes for Section 15-2~3

CHAPTER 8 TEST REVIEW MARKSCHEME

Transcription:

VERIFICATION OF TAPPING MACHINES Håkan Andersson SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Acoustics Laboratory Box 57, SE-51 15 Borås, Sweden hakan.andersson@sp.se ABSTRACT Six tapping machines of three different models have been verified. Only one of them was fulfilling the specification. All the others fail in at least one of the tests, such as velocity at impact, interval of impact or hammer head dimension. The high ratio of tapping machines not fulfilling the specification any more points out the need for regular verification. 1. INTRODUCTION The requirements for tapping machines are specified in annexes to ISO 1- to [1]. They are mechanically defined such as number and mass of hammers, angle, timing and velocity of hammer impact, etc. According to ISO 1, some of the parameters only need to be determined once and some should be verified regularly. A procedure for regular verification of tapping machines has been established at SP. Verification measurements have been made on a batch of two machines of each model B&K 3, B&K 37 and Norsonic 11. Two of them were very old, three of them have been used for a while and one was almost brand new.. METHODS AND RESULTS.1. General ISO 1 requires that the tapping machine is verified on a test surface that is flat to within ±,1 mm and horizontal to within,1. To comply with that requirement the tests at SP are carried out on a polished stone table with a mass of 5 kg, designed for precision dimensional measurements. Besides the tests described below, checks for exceptional sounds are made by listening... Impact momentum The momentum of each hammer that strikes the floor shall be of an effective mass of 5 g, which falls freely from a height of mm. The momentum tolerance is 5 %. As friction of the hammer guidance is not negligible, the hammer velocity at impact has to be measured. The method used at SP for measuring falling velocity is laser interferometry. A retroreflecting tape is fastened to the impact surface of the hammer, which is positioned over a hole in the stone table. Below the table the laser interferometer beam is pointing at the retroreflector through the hole in the table, measuring the falling velocity. BNAM-1

Picture 1. Test table with laser interferometer below. As mentioned above, the impact momentum is a function of mass of hammers and velocity at impact. For all tested tapping machines, the mass of hammers were within tolerances. However, three of the tapping machines had at least one hammer with a velocity outside the tolerance. The result of the velocity measurements of the six tapping machines is given in figure 1. The fact that the brand new tapping machine has all its hammers in the two right bars in the figure indicates that the friction of the hammer guidance increases by the use of the machine. Cleaning and greasing the hammer guidance according to the manufacturer s manuals did not in all cases bring the falling velocity within the tolerance. In some cases the falling height had to be adjusted to a level above the length of the height adjusting rod, supplied with the tapping machine. 5 3 1 75 7 755 77 75 15 3 5 75 9 95 9 Impact velocity (mm/s) Figure 1. Results of impact velocity measurements. BNAM-

.3. Impact interval According to ISO 1, the time between successive impacts shall be 1 ± ms and the mean time between impacts shall be 1 ±5 ms. The method used to measure the impact timing requires that an accelerometer and a storage oscilloscope are used. The accelerometer is placed on the table with the same distance to the two successive hammers to be measured. All the other hammers are damped. The results of the impact interval measurements of the six tapping machines are given in figure a and b. The five hammer pairs outside the tolerance belong to the same tapping machine. Number of hammer pairs 1 1 5 7 9 1 Time between successive impacts (ms) Figure a. Results of impact interval measurements. 11 1 13 1 15 1 17 1 Number of tapping machines 3 1 91 9 93 9 95 9 97 9 99 1 11 1 13 1 15 Mean time between impacts (ms) Figure b. Results of mean impact interval measurements. BNAM-3

.. Hammer head diameter and curvature The tip of the hammer shall be spherical with a radius of curvature of 5 ±1 mm. The diameter of the hammer heads shall be 3 ±, mm. The curvature measurements are carried out using a surface roughness instrument at the department for dimensional metrology at SP. The curvature is measured along two perpendicular lines through the centre point of the hammer tip. The curvature radius is determined using the least square method. The results of the curvature radius measurements of the six tapping machines are given in figure 3. 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 Curvature radius (mm) Figure 3. Results of hammer tip curvature measurements. The diameter of the hammer heads are measured using a micrometer. The results of the hammer head diameter measurements of the six tapping machines are given in figure. The hammer outside the tolerance had visual damages close to the rim. 1 1 1 9, 9,5 9,9 9,95 3, 3,5 3,1 3,15 3, 3,5 3,3 Hammer head diameter (mm) Figure. Results of hammer head diameter measurements. BNAM-

.5. Falling direction The falling direction of the hammers shall be perpendicular to the test surface to within ±,5. The method used means that the blade of an angle meter is aligned to the vertical envelope surface of the hammer. To give space for the angle meter the tapping machine is placed on distance cylinders. All six tested tapping machines had falling directions within the required tolerance. Picture. Measurement of falling direction. 3. CONCLUSIONS The high ratio of tapping machines, five of six tested, found not to fulfil the requirements of ISO 1 any more points out the need for regular verification. Checking the falling height with the supplied height adjustment rod is not always sufficient due to increased friction of the hammer guidance. The verification interval needed is dependent on the time and environment of use but should not be more than three years.. REFERENCES [1] ISO 1 Acoustics Measurements of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements, part -, Annex A. BNAM-5