Analysis of De-correlation Filters Performance For Estimating Temporal Mass Variations Determined From GRACE-Based GGMs Over Konya Basin

Similar documents
GRACE Measurement of Total Water Storage Variations Over Texas

Vicente, R.O, and C.R. Wilson, On Long Period Polar Motion, Journal of Geodesy, 2002, 76:

Nuisance Flooding and Relative Sea-Level Rise: The Importance of Present-Day. Land Motion

Deriving groundwater estimates in Australia from GRACE observations

Impact of short period, non-tidal, temporal mass variability on GRACE gravity estimates

GIA Requirements for Future Gravity Satellite Missions: Implications After More Than 7 Years of GRACE Data

Estimating continental water storage variations in Central Asia area using GRACE data

Landwater variation in four major river basins of the Indochina peninsula as revealed by GRACE

Deriving groundwater estimates in Australia from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observations

Copyright 2004 American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted.

Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) alias error from ocean tides

Time-variable gravity from SLR and DORIS tracking

The 2009 exceptional Amazon flood and interannual terrestrial water storage change observed by GRACE

Estimating geocenter variations from a combination of GRACE and ocean model output

Simulation Study of a Follow-On Gravity Mission to GRACE

Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement

Effects of ice melting on GRACE observations of ocean mass trends

Using nonlinear programming to correct leakage and estimate mass change from GRACE observation and its application to Antarctica

2005 drought event in the Amazon River basin as measured by GRACE and estimated by climate models

GRACE impact in geodesy and geophysics. R. Biancale (GRGS-CNES Toulouse), M. Diament (IPG Paris)

Satellite Gravimetry and its Application to Glaciology by Anthony Arendt for the UAF Summer School in Glaciology, June post-glacial rebound

Gravimetry as a tool for hydrologic research at the Sutherland Observatory

Extracting low frequency climate signal from GRACE data

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Validation of GRACE time-variable gravity field by ICESat, GPS, WGHM and altimetry satellites

GRACE observes small-scale mass loss in Greenland

Low-Frequency Exchange of Mass Between Ocean Basins

Hydrological Mass Variations due to Extreme Weather Conditions in Central Europe from Regional GRACE 4D Expansions

CAPABILITY OF DETECTING RAPID SUBSIDENCE WITH COSMO SKYMED AND SENTINEL-1 DATASET OVER KONYA CITY

Dependences in the pillar Earth s gravity field of

How to validate satellite-derived gravity observations with gravimeters at the ground? Jacques Hinderer, Caroline de Linage & Jean-Paul Boy

Geophysical Journal International

Wiener optimal combination and evaluation of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) gravity fields over Antarctica

Supporting Online Material for

Towards combined global monthly gravity field solutions

Hydrology signal from GRACE gravity data in the Nelson River basin, Canada: a comparison of two approaches

Regional gravity field recovery from GRACE using position optimized radial base functions

Relationship between glacial isostatic adjustment and gravity perturbations observed by GRACE

Evaluation of EGM2008 by comparison with other recent global gravity field models

Current ice loss in small glacier systems of the Arctic Islands from satellite gravimetry

Hydrological balance in the large Russian river basins from GRACE satellites

(2007), Ocean tidal solutions in Antarctica from GRACE intersatellite

Earth rotation and Earth gravity field from GRACE observations. Lucia Seoane, Christian Bizouard, Daniel Gambis

Multi-sensor analysis of water storage variations of the Caspian Sea

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Evaluation of the EGM2008 Gravity Model

A Global Evaluation of Ocean Bottom Pressure from GRACE, OMCT, and Steric-Corrected Altimetry

Low degree gravity changes from GRACE, Earth rotation, geophysical models, and satellite laser ranging

Rising Sea Level Observations and Causes. Anny Cazenave LEGOS-CNES, Toulouse, France

1

Retrieving snow mass from GRACE terrestrial water storage change with a land surface model

Supporting Information

B. Loomis, D. Wiese, R. S. Nerem (1) P. L. Bender (2) P. N. A. M. Visser (3)

Periodic components of water storage changes from GRACE and global hydrology models

Model name GO_CONS_GCF_2_DIR_R5 Producer Method Data period Max. degree Input data Processing strategy

Acceleration in the global mean sea level rise:

Global mass flux solutions from GRACE: A comparison of parameter estimation strategies Mass concentrations versus Stokes coefficients

Journal of Geodynamics

Joint Inversion of GPS site displacements, ocean bottom pressure models and GRACE gravimetry

Supplement of Using satellite laser ranging to measure ice mass change in Greenland and Antarctica

Coseismic and postseismic deformation of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake constrained by GRACE gravimetry

Time-variable aliasing effects of ocean tides, atmosphere, and continental water mass on monthly mean GRACE gravity field

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

Interannual variations in degree-2 Earth s gravity coefficients C 2,0,C 2,2, and S 2,2 reveal large-scale mass transfers of climatic origin

Current ice loss in small glacier systems of the Arctic Islands (Iceland, Svalbard, and the Russian High Arctic) from satellite gravimetry

The Earth s time-variable gravity field observed by GOCE

Wavelet Modeling of the Gravity Field over Japan

Consistency of Earth Rotation, Gravity, and Shape Measurements

Numerical simulation of Earth s gravitational field recovery from SST based on the energy conservation principle

SLR and the Gravity Field

Southern Ocean mass variation studies using GRACE and satellite altimetry

International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM)

Gravity recovery capability of four generic satellite formations

Glacier changes in Alaska: can mass-balance models explain GRACE mascon trends?

Weighing Earth, Tracking Water: Hydrological Applications of data from GRACE satellites

On Some Recent Applications of Gravimetry to Earth Sciences

Remote Sensing 4 Global mass changes from remote sensing

Increasing subsurface water storage in discontinuous permafrost. areas of the Lena River basin, Eurasia, detected from GRACE,

Postseismic signature of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake on low-degree gravity harmonics

Sea level change recent past, present, future

Validation of GRACE Data Using GGP stations from Europe and Asia

Comparison of Seasonal Terrestrial Water Storage Variations from GRACE with Groundwater-Level Measurements from the High Plains Aquifer (USA)

Isolating the PGR signal in the GRACE data: impact on mass balance estimates in Antarctica and Greenland

Simulation study of a follow-on gravity mission to GRACE

Earth system. space. planets. atmosphere. ice sheets. ocean. biosphere, technosphere. solid Earth. gravitation on. orbit, spin, tides

Estimated accuracies of regional water storage variations inferred from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)

Originally published as:

Co-seismic Gravity Changes Computed for a Spherical Earth Model Applicable to GRACE Data

Geophysical Research Letters

Local to Regional Hydrological Model Calibration for the Okavango River Basin from In-situ and Space Borne Gravity Observations

GOCE DATA PRODUCT VERIFICATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA

ERS ORBIT DETERMINATION AND GRAVITY FIELD MODEL TAILORING: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

PUBLICATIONS. Geophysical Research Letters. An increase in the rate of global mean sea level rise since 2010 RESEARCH LETTER 10.

Time variations of land water storage from an inversion. of 2 years of GRACE geoids

Observing coseismic gravity change from the Japan Tohoku-Oki 2011 earthquake with GOCE gravity gradiometry

Arctic Ocean Mean Sea Surface, Geoid and Gravity from Surface Data, Icesat and GRACE a reference for Cryosat sea-ice mapping

Geophysical Journal International

GJI Geodesy, potential field and applied geophysics

How significant is the dynamic component of the North American vertical datum?

Interannual variability in water storage over in the Amazon Basin. from GRACE space gravimetry, in situ river level. and precipitation data

Transcription:

Analysis of De-correlation Filters Performance For Estimating Temporal Mass Variations Determined From GRACE-Based GGMs Over Konya Basin Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey Emel Zeray Öztürk 1, Walyeldeen Godah 2, R. Alpay Abbak 1 1 Selçuk University, Geomatics Eng. Dept., Konya Turkey 2 Institute of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw, Poland 1/20

Content 1. Introduction 2. Data Used and Study Area 3. Method 4. Results 5. Conclusions and recommendations 2/20

1 Introduction GRACE Mission (March 2002- October 2017) GRACE Follow-On (ca. May 2018 ca. May 2023) 3/20

1 Introduction Tectonic motions (e.g. Mikhailov et al., 2004; Choi et al., 2006; Han and Simons 2008) Ocean mass variations (e.g. Chambers, 2009) Glacier melting (e.g. Slobbe et al., 2009) Level changes in groundwater sources (e.g. Swenson and Wahr 2003; Schmidt et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2008; Cazenave and Chen, 2010) GRACE gravitational field solutions are often used to estimate the equivalent water thickness (EWT) because of their high sensitivity to hydrological changes at the global and regional scales. 4/20

1 Introduction Release 1 Release 2 Release 3 Release 4 Release 5 (RL05) Gaussian Filtering Method De-correlation Filtering Method 5/20

2 Data Used and Study Area The basin spreads over an area of almost 5 million hectares, is one of the regions where mass variations are most intense. 6/20

2 Data Used and Study Area GFZ JPL CSR centers (filtered with DDK1, DDK2, DDK3, DDK4, DDK5, DDK6, DDK7, DDK8) The GGMs are released on the ICGEM website (http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/home) The coefficients of all data centers were cut at 60 d/o. 7/20

2 Data Used and Study Area WaterGAP (Water Global Assesment and Prognosis) Global Hydrological Model (WGHM) was used to compare GRACE-based GGMs in the study. WGHM, produced at 0.5 0.5 spatial resolution and monthly runoff and river discharge, is based on meteorological and hydrological datasets. In addition to WGHM data, Mascon (mass concentration) solutions produced by the JPL were used as second evaluation data. 8/20

3 Method FORMULAE EWT (GRACE) = R ρ av 3 N max n 2n + 1 Y 1 + k nm (φ, λ) n n=0 m=0 ΔEWT i (GRACE) = EWT i (GRACE) EWT (GRACE) mean ΔEWT i (WGHM) = EWT i (WGHM) EWT (WGHM) mean dδewt i = ΔEWT i (WGHM) ΔEWT i (GRACE) 9/20

4 Results Statistics of the differences between EWT (WGHM) and EWT (GRACE) obtained from GFZ Statistics[m] Min Max Mean Std Max-min (P 1 ) DDK1-0.097 0.098-0.004 0.045 0.194 DDK2-0.139 0.081-0.025 0.051 0.220 DDK3-0.162 0.098-0.037 0.061 0.260 DDK4-0.165 0.118-0.033 0.065 0.283 DDK5-0.200 0.190-0.009 0.079 0.390 DDK6-0.221 0.227 0.006 0.089 0.448 DDK7-0.293 0.299 0.045 0.130 0.592 DDK8-0.350 0.358 0.047 0.157 0.708 (P 2 ) Min Max Mean Std Max-min DDK1-0.123 0.125 0.004 0.054 0.248 DDK2-0.093 0.164 0.032 0.055 0.257 DDK3-0.092 0.210 0.049 0.063 0.302 DDK4-0.096 0.207 0.049 0.066 0.303 DDK5-0.097 0.274 0.059 0.077 0.371 DDK6-0.114 0.337 0.077 0.085 0.451 DDK7-0.177 0.507 0.133 0.128 0.684 DDK8-0.228 0.556 0.145 0.162 0.784 10/20

4 Results 11/20

4 Results 12/20

4 Results 13/20

4 Results 14/20

4 Results Statistics of the differences between ΔEWT (WGHM) and ΔEWT (GRACE) Statistics[m] Min Max Mean Std Max-min P 1 GFZ -0.098 0.097 0.004 0.045 0.194 CSR -0.127 0.079-0.022 0.047 0.206 JPL -0.132 0.084-0.021 0.050 0.216 P 2 GFZ -0.123 0.125 0.004 0.054 0.248 CSR -0.160 0.100-0.028 0.057 0.260 JPL -0.169 0.104-0.028 0.061 0.273 15/20

5 Conclusions and recommendations In this study, the performance of De-correlation filters for estimating temporal mass variations determined from GRACE-based GGMs over Konya basin is investigated DDK1 and DDK2 filters are more suitable to reduce noise contained in RL05 GRACE-based GGMs, when estimating mass variations in the Earth system over Konya basin. It can be highly recommended to use RL05 GRACEbased GGMs developed by GFZ center in order to determine the mass changes in Konya basin. 16/20

Thanks! 17/20

References Bettadpur S., (2012), UTCSR Level-2 Processing Standards Document for Level-2 Product Release 0005, GRACE 327 742, CSR Publ. GR-12- xx, Rev. 4.0, pp. 16, University of Texas at Austin. Cazenave A., Chen J., (2010), Time-variable gravity from space and present-day mass redistribution in the earth system, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 298, 263-274. Chambers D.P., (2006), Evaluation of new GRACE time-variable gravity data over the ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(17), doi:10.1029/2006gl027296. Chen Y., Schaffrin B., Shum C.K., (2008), Continental water storage changes from GRACE line-of-sight range acceleration measurements, VI Houtine-Marussi Symposium on Theoretical and Computational Geodesy, Vol. 132, 62-66. Choi S., Oh C.W., Luehr H., (2006), Tectonic relation between northeastern China and the Korean peninsula revealed by interpretation of GRACE satellite gravity data, Gondwana Research, 9, 62-67. Dahle C., Flechtner F., Gruber C., König D., König R., Michalak G., Neumayer K.H., (2014), GFZ RL05: An Improved Time- Series of Monthly GRACE Gravity Field Solutions, Observation of the System Earth from Space CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE and future missions, Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences, pp. 29 39, Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32135-1_4. Ditmar P., Teixeira da Encarnação J., Farahani H.H., (2012), Understanding data noise in gravity field recovery on the basis of inter-satellite ranging measurements acquired by the satellite gravimetry mission GRACE, J Geod. 87(9), pp. 1 25, doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0531 6. Döll, P., Müller Schmied H., Schuh C., Portmann F. T., Eicker A., (2014), Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites. Water Resources Research 50 (7), 5698-5720, doi:10.1002/2014wr015595. Godah W, Szelachowska M, Krynski J (2015). On the selection of GRACE-based GGMs and filtering method for estimating mass variations in the system earth over Poland. Geoinf Issues 7(1(7)):5 14 18/20

References Han S.C., Simons F.J., (2008), Spatiospectral localization of global geopotential fields from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) reveals the coseismic gravity change owing to the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake, Journal of Geophysical Research, 113( B01405). Krynski J., Kloch-Glowka G., Szelachowska M., (2014), Analysis of time variations of the gravity field over Europe obtained from GRACE data in terms of geoid height and mass variations, In: C. Rizos and P. Willis (Eds.), Earth on the Edge: Science for a Sustainable Planet, International Association of Geodesy Symposia 139: pp. 365 370. Kusche J., (2007), Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time variable GRACEtype gravity field models, J. Geod. 81(11), pp. 733 749. Kusche J., Schmidt R., Petrovic S., Rietbroek R., (2009), Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model, J. Geod. 83(10): pp. 903 913. Luthcke S.B., Sabaka T.J., Loomis B.D., Arendt A.A., McCarthy J.J., Camp J., (2013), Antarctica, Greenland and Gulf of Alaska land-ice evolution from an iterated GRACE global mascon solution, J. Glaciol., 59(216), pp. 613 631, doi: 10.3189/2013JoG12J147. Mikhailov V., Tikhotsky S., Diament M., Panet I., Ballu V., (2004), Can tectonic processes be recovered from new gravity satellite data?, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 228, 281-297. Müller Schmied, H., Eisner, S., Franz, D., Wattenbach, M., Portmann, F. T., Flörke, M., Döll, P., (2014), Sensitivity of simulated global-scale freshwater fluxes and storages to input data, hydrological model structure, human water use and calibration. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 3511-3538. doi:10.5194/hess-18.3511-2014. Müller Schmied, H., Adam, L., Eisner, S., Fink, G., Flörke, M., Kim, H., Oki, T., Portmann, F. T., Reinecke, R., Riedel, C., Song, Q., Zhang, J., Döll, P., (2016), Variations of global and continental water balance components as impacted by climate forcing uncertainty and human water use, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20(7), 2877 2898, doi:10.5194/hess-20-2877-2016. Müller Schmied H., (2017), Evaluation, modification and application of a global hydrological model. Frankfurt Hydrology Paper 16, Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main. https://fiona.server.unifrankfurt.de/default/65883413/mueller_schmied_2017_evaluation_modification_and_application_of_a_global_hydrological _model.pdf. 19/20

References Schmidt R., Schwintzer P., Flechtner F., Reigber C.H., Güntner A., Döll P., Ramillien G., Cazenave A., Petrovic S., Jochmann H., Wünsch J., (2006), GRACE observations of changes in continental water storage, Global and Planetary Change, 50, 112-126. Slobbe D.C., Ditmar P., Lindenbergh R.C., (2009), Estimating the rates of mass change, ice volume change and snow volume change in greenland from ICESat and GRACE data, Geophysical Journal International, 176, 95-106. Swenson S., Wahr J., (2003), Monitoring changes in continental water storage with GRACE, Space Science Reviews, 108, 345-354. Swenson S., Wahr J., (2007): Multi-sensor analysis of water storage variations in the Caspian Sea, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L16401, doi:10.1029/ 2007GL030733. Tapley B.D., Bettadpur S., Watkins M., Reigber C., (2004), The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L09607, doi: 10.1029/2004GL019920. Ustun A., Tusat E., Yalvac S., Ozkan I., Eren Y., Ozdemir A., Bildirici I.O., Ustuntas T., Kirtiloglu O.S., Mesutoglu M., Doganalp S., Canaslan F. Abbak R.A., Avsar N.B., Simsek, F.F.(2015), Land subsidence in Konya Closed Basin and its spatio-temporal detection by GPS and DInSAR, Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(10), 6691-6703. Wahr J., Swenson S., Velicogna I., (2006), Accuracy of grace mass estimates, Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (L06401). Wahr J., Molenaar M., Bryan F., (1998), Time variability of the Earth s gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE, J. Geophys. Res., 103(B12), pp. 30205 30229. Watkins, M. M., Wiese D. N., Yuan D.-N., Boening C., and Landerer F. W., (2015), Improved methods for observing Earth s time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 120, doi:10.1002/2014jb011547. Wu X., Helfin M.B., (2015), A global assessment of accelerations in surface mass transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42(16), pp. 6716 6723, doi: 10.1002/2015GL064941. 20/20